<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in/</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 10:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>U/s 80P Deduction Cannot Be Withdrawn Through Section 154: ITAT Says Debatable Issues Are Beyond Rectification Powers</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-80p-deduction-withdrawn-section-154-itat-debatable-issues-rectification-powers.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-80p-deduction-withdrawn-section-154-itat-debatable-issues-rectification-powers.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 07:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal ruled that the Assessing Officer wrongly invoked Section 154 to withdraw deduction on interest income from co-operative banks. Since the issue is subject to differing judicial interpretations, it falls outside the scope of rectification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-80p-deduction-withdrawn-section-154-itat-debatable-issues-rectification-powers.html">U/s 80P Deduction Cannot Be Withdrawn Through Section 154: ITAT Says Debatable Issues Are Beyond Rectification Powers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-80p-deduction-withdrawn-section-154-itat-debatable-issues-rectification-powers.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>U/s 54F Relief Allowed Despite Sale Deed After Two Years- ITAT Holds Flat Booking &amp; Substantial Payment Satisfy the Law</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-54f-relief-allowed-sale-deed-years-itat-holds-flat-booking-substantial-payment-satisfy-law.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-54f-relief-allowed-sale-deed-years-itat-holds-flat-booking-substantial-payment-satisfy-law.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal ruled that booking a residential flat and making substantial payments toward its acquisition can amount to a purchase for Section 54F purposes. Registration at a later date does not automatically defeat the exemption claim.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-54f-relief-allowed-sale-deed-years-itat-holds-flat-booking-substantial-payment-satisfy-law.html">U/s 54F Relief Allowed Despite Sale Deed After Two Years- ITAT Holds Flat Booking &#038; Substantial Payment Satisfy the Law</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/u-s-54f-relief-allowed-sale-deed-years-itat-holds-flat-booking-substantial-payment-satisfy-law.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Stays HC Ruling as GST Portal Upload Alone Was Held Insufficient Communication</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-stays-hc-ruling-gst-portal-upload-held-insufficient-communication.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-stays-hc-ruling-gst-portal-upload-held-insufficient-communication.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court stayed an Allahabad High Court judgment that held mere uploading of GST orders on the portal does not automatically start limitation for appeals. The dispute concerns the meaning of “communication” under Section 107 of the GST law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-stays-hc-ruling-gst-portal-upload-held-insufficient-communication.html">SC Stays HC Ruling as GST Portal Upload Alone Was Held Insufficient Communication</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-stays-hc-ruling-gst-portal-upload-held-insufficient-communication.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on Green Trees &amp; Timber Auctions: A Comprehensive Jurisprudential Analysis</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-green-trees-timber-auctions-comprehensive-jurisprudential-analysis.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-green-trees-timber-auctions-comprehensive-jurisprudential-analysis.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RAVINDRA KUMAR RASTOGI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The taxability of forest auctioned trees depends on whether they are intended to be cut and removed. Courts and authorities have consistently held that mandatory severance converts standing trees into taxable goods.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-green-trees-timber-auctions-comprehensive-jurisprudential-analysis.html">GST on Green Trees &#038; Timber Auctions: A Comprehensive Jurisprudential Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-green-trees-timber-auctions-comprehensive-jurisprudential-analysis.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BSNL VRS Compensation Fully Exempt U/s 10(10B); ITAT Also Allows Full Leave Encashment Relief to Former DOT/BSNL Employees</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-compensation-fully-exempt-u-s-10-10b-itat-full-leave-encashment-relief-dot-bsnl-employees.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-compensation-fully-exempt-u-s-10-10b-itat-full-leave-encashment-relief-dot-bsnl-employees.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT ruled that employees opting for the BSNL VRS Scheme, 2019 are entitled to full exemption under Section 10(10B) on retrenchment compensation. The decision rejects the view that exemption should be capped at ₹5 lakh under Section 10(10C).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-compensation-fully-exempt-u-s-10-10b-itat-full-leave-encashment-relief-dot-bsnl-employees.html">BSNL VRS Compensation Fully Exempt U/s 10(10B); ITAT Also Allows Full Leave Encashment Relief to Former DOT/BSNL Employees</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bsnl-vrs-compensation-fully-exempt-u-s-10-10b-itat-full-leave-encashment-relief-dot-bsnl-employees.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missed Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Lifeline – AO Directed to Await Condonation Decision Before Denying Section 11(2) Benefit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/missed-form-10-itat-trust-lifeline-ao-directed-await-condonation-decision-denying-section-11-2-benefit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/missed-form-10-itat-trust-lifeline-ao-directed-await-condonation-decision-denying-section-11-2-benefit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal observed that the trust had eventually filed Form 10 and sought condonation of delay. Since the issue was pending before the competent authority, the exemption dispute was restored for reconsideration.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/missed-form-10-itat-trust-lifeline-ao-directed-await-condonation-decision-denying-section-11-2-benefit.html">Missed Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Lifeline &#8211; AO Directed to Await Condonation Decision Before Denying Section 11(2) Benefit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/missed-form-10-itat-trust-lifeline-ao-directed-await-condonation-decision-denying-section-11-2-benefit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITR-1 Then &amp; Now: How India’s Simplest Tax Return Has Evolved for Salaried Taxpayers</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-1-now-indias-simplest-tax-return-evolved-salaried-taxpayers.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-1-now-indias-simplest-tax-return-evolved-salaried-taxpayers.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Pratik Tripathi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 26AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itr 1]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITR-1 has evolved from a self-declaration return to a data-reconciliation exercise backed by AIS, TIS, and Form 26AS. Salaried taxpayers must now focus on matching departmental records before filing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-1-now-indias-simplest-tax-return-evolved-salaried-taxpayers.html">ITR-1 Then &#038; Now: How India&#8217;s Simplest Tax Return Has Evolved for Salaried Taxpayers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-1-now-indias-simplest-tax-return-evolved-salaried-taxpayers.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIT(E) Cannot Act Merely on AO’s Recommendation – Independent Satisfaction Mandatory for Grant or Rejection of U/s 12AB Registration</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-e-act-aos-recommendation-independent-satisfaction-mandatory-grant-rejection-u-s-12ab-registration.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-e-act-aos-recommendation-independent-satisfaction-mandatory-grant-rejection-u-s-12ab-registration.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80G]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT held that registration under Section 12AB cannot be rejected merely because the Assessing Officer or Range Head did not recommend approval. The CIT(E) must independently examine the trust’s objects, activities, and legal compliance before arriving at a decision.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-e-act-aos-recommendation-independent-satisfaction-mandatory-grant-rejection-u-s-12ab-registration.html">CIT(E) Cannot Act Merely on AO’s Recommendation &#8211; Independent Satisfaction Mandatory for Grant or Rejection of U/s 12AB Registration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cit-e-act-aos-recommendation-independent-satisfaction-mandatory-grant-rejection-u-s-12ab-registration.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>सरकारी विभाग की Delay condolence बनाम करदाता की Delay condolence?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delayed-condolences-government-department-taxpayers-delayed-condolences.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delayed-condolences-government-department-taxpayers-delayed-condolences.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SANJAY SHARMA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hindi Articles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>लेख इस मुद्दे का विश्लेषण करता है कि सरकारी विभागों को विलंब माफी में राहत मिलने के बावजूद करदाताओं की अपीलें limitation पर क्यों खारिज हो जाती हैं। यह अनुच्छेद 14 के तहत समानता के सिद्धांत की पड़ताल करता है।</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delayed-condolences-government-department-taxpayers-delayed-condolences.html">सरकारी विभाग की Delay condolence बनाम करदाता की Delay condolence?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delayed-condolences-government-department-taxpayers-delayed-condolences.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBIC Revises Customs Tariff Values for Palm Oil, Soybean Oil and Brass Scrap from May 30, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cbic-revises-customs-tariff-values-palm-oil-soybean-oil-brass-scrap-30-may-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cbic-revises-customs-tariff-values-palm-oil-soybean-oil-brass-scrap-30-may-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CBIC has updated tariff values for edible oils and brass scrap under Section 14 of the Customs Act. The notification revises benchmark customs values effective from 30 May 2026 while retaining existing values for gold and areca nuts.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cbic-revises-customs-tariff-values-palm-oil-soybean-oil-brass-scrap-30-may-2026.html">CBIC Revises Customs Tariff Values for Palm Oil, Soybean Oil and Brass Scrap from May 30, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cbic-revises-customs-tariff-values-palm-oil-soybean-oil-brass-scrap-30-may-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRDAI Issues Warning for Shareholding Changes Without Prior Approval</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-issues-warning-shareholding-prior-approval.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-issues-warning-shareholding-prior-approval.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRDA Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved a broker implementing substantial shareholding changes without obtaining IRDAI's prior approval as required by regulations. IRDAI held that the violation was established but issued a warning considering corrective measures and future compliance commitments.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-issues-warning-shareholding-prior-approval.html">IRDAI Issues Warning for Shareholding Changes Without Prior Approval</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-issues-warning-shareholding-prior-approval.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBDT Directs Uniform Application of Sections 68 to 69D as C&amp;AG Flags Tax Assessment Errors</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-directs-uniform-application-sections-68-69d-cag-flags-tax-assessment-errors.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-directs-uniform-application-sections-68-69d-cag-flags-tax-assessment-errors.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69D]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CBDT has instructed tax officers to uniformly apply Sections 68 to 69D and Section 115BBE after a C&#038;AG audit found inconsistencies in assessments and incorrect tax computations leading to revenue loss.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-directs-uniform-application-sections-68-69d-cag-flags-tax-assessment-errors.html">CBDT Directs Uniform Application of Sections 68 to 69D as C&#038;AG Flags Tax Assessment Errors</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-directs-uniform-application-sections-68-69d-cag-flags-tax-assessment-errors.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGFT Launches Electronic Certificate of Origin for India-Oman CEPA from June 1, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-electronic-certificate-origin-india-oman-cepa-june-1-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-electronic-certificate-origin-india-oman-cepa-june-1-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DGFT has introduced electronic Preferential Certificates of Origin through the Trade Connect platform for exports to Oman under the India-Oman CEPA. The move digitizes issuance, verification, and authentication of origin certificates.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-electronic-certificate-origin-india-oman-cepa-june-1-2026.html">DGFT Launches Electronic Certificate of Origin for India-Oman CEPA from June 1, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-electronic-certificate-origin-india-oman-cepa-june-1-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MCA Expands CSR Scope by Allowing Investment in Social Stock Exchange Instruments</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-expands-csr-scope-allowing-investment-social-stock-exchange-instruments.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-expands-csr-scope-allowing-investment-social-stock-exchange-instruments.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The MCA has widened CSR eligibility by recognizing subscriptions to Zero Coupon Zero Principal Instruments as a valid CSR activity. The amendment creates a new avenue for funding public welfare projects through Social Stock Exchange-listed NPOs.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-expands-csr-scope-allowing-investment-social-stock-exchange-instruments.html">MCA Expands CSR Scope by Allowing Investment in Social Stock Exchange Instruments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-expands-csr-scope-allowing-investment-social-stock-exchange-instruments.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bangalore ITAT Slams Flip-Flop by AO; Grants Full 80P Deduction Including Bank Interest to Credit Co-operative Society</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-slams-flip-flop-aogrants-full-80p-deduction-including-bank-interest-credit-co-operative-society.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-slams-flip-flop-aogrants-full-80p-deduction-including-bank-interest-credit-co-operative-society.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 06:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 254]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 56]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal criticized the Assessing Officer for taking a contrary stand in later years after allowing the same deduction on identical facts in an earlier assessment. It held that such inconsistent treatment without distinguishing facts was unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-slams-flip-flop-aogrants-full-80p-deduction-including-bank-interest-credit-co-operative-society.html">Bangalore ITAT Slams Flip-Flop by AO; Grants Full 80P Deduction Including Bank Interest to Credit Co-operative Society</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bangalore-itat-slams-flip-flop-aogrants-full-80p-deduction-including-bank-interest-credit-co-operative-society.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Taxation 2026: Business use of your home deduction</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-2026-business-home-deduction.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-2026-business-home-deduction.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subramanian Natarajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international taxation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Learn when home office expenses qualify for tax deductions under IRS rules. The article explains exclusive use, regular use, principal place of business tests, and available deduction methods.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-2026-business-home-deduction.html">US Taxation 2026: Business use of your home deduction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-2026-business-home-deduction.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Registration Cancellation Quashed as Show Cause Notice Lacked Material Facts</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-quashed-show-notice-lacked-material-facts.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-quashed-show-notice-lacked-material-facts.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court set aside retrospective GST registration cancellation after finding that the show cause notice failed to disclose the factual basis of the allegations. The ruling emphasizes the need for a meaningful opportunity to respond before adverse action is taken.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-quashed-show-notice-lacked-material-facts.html">GST Registration Cancellation Quashed as Show Cause Notice Lacked Material Facts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-quashed-show-notice-lacked-material-facts.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajasthan HC Upholds GST on BOT Highway Project as Toll Rights Constitute Consideration for Construction Services</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rajasthan-hc-upholds-gst-bot-highway-project-toll-rights-constitute-consideration-construction-services.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rajasthan-hc-upholds-gst-bot-highway-project-toll-rights-constitute-consideration-construction-services.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that toll collection rights granted under a BOT concession agreement amounted to consideration for works contract services. As a result, GST liability on the road construction arrangement was upheld.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rajasthan-hc-upholds-gst-bot-highway-project-toll-rights-constitute-consideration-construction-services.html">Rajasthan HC Upholds GST on BOT Highway Project as Toll Rights Constitute Consideration for Construction Services</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rajasthan-hc-upholds-gst-bot-highway-project-toll-rights-constitute-consideration-construction-services.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC Set Aside State GST Action Due to Overlap With Prior CGST Show Cause Notice</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-state-gst-action-due-overlap-prior-cgst-show-notice.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-state-gst-action-due-overlap-prior-cgst-show-notice.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that an earlier CGST show cause notice involving overlapping entities could not be ignored. The State GST notice was directed to remain in abeyance pending adjudication by the CGST Authority.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-state-gst-action-due-overlap-prior-cgst-show-notice.html">Delhi HC Set Aside State GST Action Due to Overlap With Prior CGST Show Cause Notice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/delhi-hc-set-state-gst-action-due-overlap-prior-cgst-show-notice.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orissa HC Stays Recovery Action as Taxpayer’s Objection to MV Tax Demand Was Still Pending</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-stays-recovery-action-taxpayers-objection-mv-tax-demand-pending.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-stays-recovery-action-taxpayers-objection-mv-tax-demand-pending.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court directed the Tax Recovery Officer to decide the taxpayer’s pending objection after payment of arrear MV tax. It also restrained authorities from taking coercive recovery measures until the objection is adjudicated.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-stays-recovery-action-taxpayers-objection-mv-tax-demand-pending.html">Orissa HC Stays Recovery Action as Taxpayer’s Objection to MV Tax Demand Was Still Pending</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/orissa-hc-stays-recovery-action-taxpayers-objection-mv-tax-demand-pending.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC Sets Aside ₹160.43 Crore Addition as AO Ignored Mandatory DRP Directions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-sets-rs-160-43-crore-addition-ao-mandatory-drp-directions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-sets-rs-160-43-crore-addition-ao-mandatory-drp-directions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that the addition under Section 40(a)(i) could not survive because it was made contrary to the DRP’s binding directions. The assessment order was set aside to that extent.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-sets-rs-160-43-crore-addition-ao-mandatory-drp-directions.html">Delhi HC Sets Aside ₹160.43 Crore Addition as AO Ignored Mandatory DRP Directions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-sets-rs-160-43-crore-addition-ao-mandatory-drp-directions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clerical Error in Tax Audit Report Cannot Be Treated as Income: ITAT Deletes Addition</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/clerical-error-tax-audit-report-treated-income-itat-deletes-addition.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/clerical-error-tax-audit-report-treated-income-itat-deletes-addition.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that a bank guarantee wrongly reported as a contingent liability in the tax audit report could not be added to income when it was not claimed as an expense. It directed deletion of the ₹9.41 lakh addition made on the basis of the reporting error.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/clerical-error-tax-audit-report-treated-income-itat-deletes-addition.html">Clerical Error in Tax Audit Report Cannot Be Treated as Income: ITAT Deletes Addition</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/clerical-error-tax-audit-report-treated-income-itat-deletes-addition.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerala HC Allows Reconsideration of ITC Claim as Return Was Filed Before Section 16(5) Cut-Off Date</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-reconsideration-itc-claim-return-filed-section-165-cut-off-date.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-reconsideration-itc-claim-return-filed-section-165-cut-off-date.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined denial of ITC and penalty imposed for alleged delayed filing of returns. It held that the return was filed before the cut-off date under Section 16(5) and directed reconsideration of the ITC claim.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-reconsideration-itc-claim-return-filed-section-165-cut-off-date.html">Kerala HC Allows Reconsideration of ITC Claim as Return Was Filed Before Section 16(5) Cut-Off Date</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/kerala-hc-reconsideration-itc-claim-return-filed-section-165-cut-off-date.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Was Based on Incorrect Facts &amp; Figures</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-section-148-notice-based-incorrect-facts-figures.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-section-148-notice-based-incorrect-facts-figures.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal found that the reasons recorded for reopening contained incorrect figures and unsupported assumptions. It held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid and void ab initio due to lack of proper application of mind.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-section-148-notice-based-incorrect-facts-figures.html">ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Was Based on Incorrect Facts &#038; Figures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-section-148-notice-based-incorrect-facts-figures.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Restores 12A Registration Application as Bona Fide Error in Form Clause Cannot Defeat Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-restores-12a-registration-application-bona-fide-error-form-clause-defeat-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-restores-12a-registration-application-bona-fide-error-form-clause-defeat-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that a trust’s application for regular registration could not be rejected solely because the wrong clause was selected in the prescribed form. It directed the authority to treat the application under the correct provision and decide it on merits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-restores-12a-registration-application-bona-fide-error-form-clause-defeat-claim.html">ITAT Restores 12A Registration Application as Bona Fide Error in Form Clause Cannot Defeat Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-restores-12a-registration-application-bona-fide-error-form-clause-defeat-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 276B Criminal Proceedings Not Quashed as Service of Notice Established Wilful Default</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-276b-criminal-proceedings-quashed-service-notice-established-wilful-default.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-276b-criminal-proceedings-quashed-service-notice-established-wilful-default.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 194A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 276B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Although the applicants highlighted the prolonged pendency of the case, the Court found that factual and legal issues remained to be examined at trial. The proceedings were therefore not quashed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-276b-criminal-proceedings-quashed-service-notice-established-wilful-default.html">Section 276B Criminal Proceedings Not Quashed as Service of Notice Established Wilful Default</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-276b-criminal-proceedings-quashed-service-notice-established-wilful-default.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Sets Aside Bail Condition as Security Bond Was Linked to Undetermined Tax &amp; Penalty Amount</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-sets-bail-condition-security-bond-linked-undetermined-tax-penalty-amount.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-sets-bail-condition-security-bond-linked-undetermined-tax-penalty-amount.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that a bail condition linked to tax and penalty amounts that were yet to be determined was vague and unenforceable. Security of disclosed assets was accepted in its place.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-sets-bail-condition-security-bond-linked-undetermined-tax-penalty-amount.html">SC Sets Aside Bail Condition as Security Bond Was Linked to Undetermined Tax &#038; Penalty Amount</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-sets-bail-condition-security-bond-linked-undetermined-tax-penalty-amount.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gauhati HC Declines Writ Petition as Effective GST Appellate Remedy Was Available</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gauhati-hc-declines-writ-petition-effective-gst-appellate-remedy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gauhati-hc-declines-writ-petition-effective-gst-appellate-remedy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction where a statutory appeal under Section 112 of the CGST Act was available. Liberty was granted to file the appeal before the prescribed deadline.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gauhati-hc-declines-writ-petition-effective-gst-appellate-remedy.html">Gauhati HC Declines Writ Petition as Effective GST Appellate Remedy Was Available</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gauhati-hc-declines-writ-petition-effective-gst-appellate-remedy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Section 16(5) Overrides Section 16(4) as Returns Were Filed Before Cut-Off Date: Kerala HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-section-165-overrides-section-164-returns-filed-cut-off-date-kerala-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-section-165-overrides-section-164-returns-filed-cut-off-date-kerala-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 05:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that returns filed before the cut-off date specified in Section 16(5) entitled the taxpayer to claim ITC. It quashed the order denying ITC based on the limitation under Section 16(4).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-section-165-overrides-section-164-returns-filed-cut-off-date-kerala-hc.html">GST Section 16(5) Overrides Section 16(4) as Returns Were Filed Before Cut-Off Date: Kerala HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-section-165-overrides-section-164-returns-filed-cut-off-date-kerala-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outward Freight Credit Cannot Be Denied When Supplier Bears Freight and Insurance Costs: CESTAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/outward-freight-credit-denied-supplier-bears-freight-insurance-costs-cestat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/outward-freight-credit-denied-supplier-bears-freight-insurance-costs-cestat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 04:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cenvat credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Kolkata held that Cenvat credit on Service Tax paid for outward freight and insurance was admissible where goods were delivered at the buyer’s premises and ownership passed there. The demand was set aside on merits and limitation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/outward-freight-credit-denied-supplier-bears-freight-insurance-costs-cestat-kolkata.html">Outward Freight Credit Cannot Be Denied When Supplier Bears Freight and Insurance Costs: CESTAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/outward-freight-credit-denied-supplier-bears-freight-insurance-costs-cestat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income Tax Demand Quashed as Resolution Plan Extinguished Pre-CIRP Tax Dues</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-demand-quashed-resolution-plan-extinguished-pre-cirp-tax-dues.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-demand-quashed-resolution-plan-extinguished-pre-cirp-tax-dues.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 04:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Gujarat High Court held that tax liabilities relating to periods before approval of a resolution plan stood extinguished under Section 31 of the IBC. Consequently, the assessment order and demand notice were quashed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-demand-quashed-resolution-plan-extinguished-pre-cirp-tax-dues.html">Income Tax Demand Quashed as Resolution Plan Extinguished Pre-CIRP Tax Dues</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-demand-quashed-resolution-plan-extinguished-pre-cirp-tax-dues.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Orders Fresh Review as On-Money Addition Was Based on Loose Sheet</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-orders-fresh-review-on-money-addition-based-loose-sheet.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-orders-fresh-review-on-money-addition-based-loose-sheet.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 04:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved additions for alleged on-money in Godhavi land transactions based on a handwritten loose sheet. The Tribunal restored the matter for fresh consideration, highlighting issues relating to evidence and assessment findings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-orders-fresh-review-on-money-addition-based-loose-sheet.html">ITAT Orders Fresh Review as On-Money Addition Was Based on Loose Sheet</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-orders-fresh-review-on-money-addition-based-loose-sheet.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Quashes Section 263 Revision Because PCIT Raised New Issues Beyond SCN</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-section-263-revision-pcit-raised-issues-scn.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-section-263-revision-pcit-raised-issues-scn.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 04:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 185]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 269SS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 269T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 40A(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 73]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi held that the PCIT exceeded jurisdiction by introducing issues not mentioned in the Section 263 show-cause notice. The revision order was quashed for travelling beyond the scope of the proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-section-263-revision-pcit-raised-issues-scn.html">ITAT Quashes Section 263 Revision Because PCIT Raised New Issues Beyond SCN</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-section-263-revision-pcit-raised-issues-scn.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kerala HC Denies Interest Deduction as Borrowed Funds Were Invested as Capital in Partnership Firm</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-denies-interest-deduction-borrowed-funds-invested-capital-partnership-firm.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-denies-interest-deduction-borrowed-funds-invested-capital-partnership-firm.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 04:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnership]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Kerala High Court held that deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) was unavailable where borrowed money was invested as capital in a partnership firm and not used for the assessee’s own business.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-denies-interest-deduction-borrowed-funds-invested-capital-partnership-firm.html">Kerala HC Denies Interest Deduction as Borrowed Funds Were Invested as Capital in Partnership Firm</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/kerala-hc-denies-interest-deduction-borrowed-funds-invested-capital-partnership-firm.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRDAI Fines Nissan Renault ₹1 Crore Over Distribution Fee Disclosure Lapses</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-fines-nissan-renault-financial-services-rs-1-crore-distribution-fee-disclosure-lapses.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-fines-nissan-renault-financial-services-rs-1-crore-distribution-fee-disclosure-lapses.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRDA Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The regulator held that agreements lacking clear fee provisions undermined contractual clarity and regulatory compliance. A penalty of ₹1 crore was imposed for violations of MISP guidelines.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-fines-nissan-renault-financial-services-rs-1-crore-distribution-fee-disclosure-lapses.html">IRDAI Fines Nissan Renault ₹1 Crore Over Distribution Fee Disclosure Lapses</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/irdai-fines-nissan-renault-financial-services-rs-1-crore-distribution-fee-disclosure-lapses.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGFT Revises SIONs for Chemical &amp; Allied Products</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-revises-sions-chemical-allied-products.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-revises-sions-chemical-allied-products.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Public Notice No. 13/2026-27 revises the standard input-output requirements for several chemical products. Exporters must now follow the updated raw material consumption norms with immediate effect.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-revises-sions-chemical-allied-products.html">DGFT Revises SIONs for Chemical &#038; Allied Products</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-revises-sions-chemical-allied-products.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Modifies Norms for Nomination in Demat Accounts &amp; Mutual Fund Folios</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-modifies-norms-nomination-demat-accounts-mutual-fund-folios.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-modifies-norms-nomination-demat-accounts-mutual-fund-folios.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI modified nomination norms for demat accounts and mutual fund folios after receiving stakeholder feedback on implementation issues. The revised framework aims to simplify investor onboarding and nomination procedures.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-modifies-norms-nomination-demat-accounts-mutual-fund-folios.html">SEBI Modifies Norms for Nomination in Demat Accounts &#038; Mutual Fund Folios</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-modifies-norms-nomination-demat-accounts-mutual-fund-folios.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MCA Adds Social Stock Exchange Instruments to CSR List</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-adds-social-stock-exchange-instruments-csr-list.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-adds-social-stock-exchange-instruments-csr-list.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MCA amends Schedule VII of the Companies Act to include subscription to zero coupon zero principal instruments on Social Stock Exchange under CSR.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-adds-social-stock-exchange-instruments-csr-list.html">MCA Adds Social Stock Exchange Instruments to CSR List</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/mca-adds-social-stock-exchange-instruments-csr-list.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-corporate-social-responsibility-policy-amendment-rules-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-corporate-social-responsibility-policy-amendment-rules-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 14:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate social responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>MCA has amended the CSR Rules to recognize zero coupon zero principal instruments issued by Social Stock Exchange-listed NPOs. The amendment creates a new channel for CSR implementation while prescribing safeguards for fund utilization.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-corporate-social-responsibility-policy-amendment-rules-2026.html">Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-corporate-social-responsibility-policy-amendment-rules-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Fresh Chartered Accountants Can Get Their First Job Faster in 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/fresh-chartered-accountants-job-faster-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/fresh-chartered-accountants-job-faster-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Tushar Makkar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chartered accountants]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how newly qualified CAs can improve placement prospects through campus registration, resume optimization, networking, and interview preparation. The key takeaway is that proactive action significantly improves job opportunities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/fresh-chartered-accountants-job-faster-2026.html">How Fresh Chartered Accountants Can Get Their First Job Faster in 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/fresh-chartered-accountants-job-faster-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies Act Amendments and Their Corporate Tax Implications</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-act-amendments-corporate-tax-implications.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-act-amendments-corporate-tax-implications.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aakash Varma Kakarlapudi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how key Companies Act amendments affect tax treatment of penalties, CSR expenditure, related party transactions, and buybacks. It highlights why corporate law changes must be evaluated alongside their income-tax implications.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-act-amendments-corporate-tax-implications.html">Companies Act Amendments and Their Corporate Tax Implications</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/companies-act-amendments-corporate-tax-implications.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supplier’s Supplier and Buyer’s Burden Under GST: Why a Genuine Consignor Cannot Be Forced to Prove a Third-Party Chain</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/suppliers-supplier-buyers-burden-gst-genuine-consignor-forced-prove-third-party-chain.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/suppliers-supplier-buyers-burden-gst-genuine-consignor-forced-prove-third-party-chain.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S PRASAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A genuine dealer can only be expected to prove his own purchase, receipt, and sale of goods. Allegations against a supplier’s supplier do not automatically justify confiscation, ITC denial, or fraud proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/suppliers-supplier-buyers-burden-gst-genuine-consignor-forced-prove-third-party-chain.html">Supplier’s Supplier and Buyer’s Burden Under GST: Why a Genuine Consignor Cannot Be Forced to Prove a Third-Party Chain</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/suppliers-supplier-buyers-burden-gst-genuine-consignor-forced-prove-third-party-chain.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers Cannot Face Criminal Prosecution Merely for Performing Professional Duties: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/lawyers-face-criminal-prosecution-performing-professional-duties-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/lawyers-face-criminal-prosecution-performing-professional-duties-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjeev Sirohi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that filing appeals and adopting a legal position on behalf of a client are professional acts that cannot by themselves attract criminal liability. It quashed the FIR, charge-sheet, and cognizance order against the advocate.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/lawyers-face-criminal-prosecution-performing-professional-duties-allahabad-hc.html">Lawyers Cannot Face Criminal Prosecution Merely for Performing Professional Duties: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/lawyers-face-criminal-prosecution-performing-professional-duties-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calcutta HC Rejects GST Challenge as DGGI Officers Were Held to Have Jurisdiction</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-rejects-gst-challenge-dggi-officers-held-jurisdiction.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-rejects-gst-challenge-dggi-officers-held-jurisdiction.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court upheld the authority of DGGI officers to initiate and pursue proceedings under the CGST Act and rejected objections regarding their status as proper officers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-rejects-gst-challenge-dggi-officers-held-jurisdiction.html">Calcutta HC Rejects GST Challenge as DGGI Officers Were Held to Have Jurisdiction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-rejects-gst-challenge-dggi-officers-held-jurisdiction.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST AAAR Upholds Ruling as Biodegradability Determination Lies With Environmental Authorities</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-upholds-ruling-biodegradability-determination-lies-environmental-authorities.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-upholds-ruling-biodegradability-determination-lies-environmental-authorities.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Rajasthan GST AAAR held that advance ruling authorities cannot determine whether bags are biodegradable or compostable. It ruled that concessional 5% GST applies only if biodegradability is established by competent authorities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-upholds-ruling-biodegradability-determination-lies-environmental-authorities.html">GST AAAR Upholds Ruling as Biodegradability Determination Lies With Environmental Authorities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-upholds-ruling-biodegradability-determination-lies-environmental-authorities.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous as Rectification Order Restored Section 80P Deduction</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-infructuous-rectification-order-restored-section-80p-deduction.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-infructuous-rectification-order-restored-section-80p-deduction.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT dismissed the appeal after a rectification order under Section 154 granted the deduction under Section 80P and corrected the assessed income. The dispute no longer survived for adjudication.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-infructuous-rectification-order-restored-section-80p-deduction.html">Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous as Rectification Order Restored Section 80P Deduction</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-infructuous-rectification-order-restored-section-80p-deduction.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 80P Deduction Disallowance Set Aside as CPC Made Adjustment Without Hearing Assessee</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80p-deduction-disallowance-set-cpc-adjustment-hearing-assessee.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80p-deduction-disallowance-set-cpc-adjustment-hearing-assessee.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 13:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that deduction under Section 80P could not be disallowed through a unilateral adjustment under Section 143(1) without providing notice and an opportunity of hearing. The appeals were allowed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80p-deduction-disallowance-set-cpc-adjustment-hearing-assessee.html">Section 80P Deduction Disallowance Set Aside as CPC Made Adjustment Without Hearing Assessee</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80p-deduction-disallowance-set-cpc-adjustment-hearing-assessee.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reassessment Held Void as AO Invoked Section 147 Instead of Section 153C</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-held-void-ao-invoked-section-147-section-153c.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-held-void-ao-invoked-section-147-section-153c.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The reassessment was based on documents found during a search conducted on another person. The Tribunal held that proceedings should have been initiated under Section 153C and not under Sections 147/148, rendering the reassessment invalid.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-held-void-ao-invoked-section-147-section-153c.html">Reassessment Held Void as AO Invoked Section 147 Instead of Section 153C</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-held-void-ao-invoked-section-147-section-153c.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Search-Based Material Required Action Under Section 153C, Not Section 148</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-search-based-material-required-action-section-153c-section-148.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-search-based-material-required-action-section-153c-section-148.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 50C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that documents relating to the assessee were found during the search of another person. It ruled that proceedings could only be initiated under Section 153C, making the reassessment under Section 148 invalid.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-search-based-material-required-action-section-153c-section-148.html">ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Search-Based Material Required Action Under Section 153C, Not Section 148</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashes-reassessment-search-based-material-required-action-section-153c-section-148.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal Dismissed as Section 143(1) Intimation Merged With Subsequent Scrutiny Assessment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-section-1431-intimation-merged-subsequent-scrutiny-assessment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-section-1431-intimation-merged-subsequent-scrutiny-assessment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that once an assessment order under Section 143(3) was passed, the earlier intimation under Section 143(1) merged into it. As a result, the appeal against the intimation became infructuous.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-section-1431-intimation-merged-subsequent-scrutiny-assessment.html">Appeal Dismissed as Section 143(1) Intimation Merged With Subsequent Scrutiny Assessment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-section-1431-intimation-merged-subsequent-scrutiny-assessment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charitable Trust Exemption Allowed as Delay in Form No. 10 Filing cannnot Defeat Genuine Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-allowed-delay-form-no10-filing-defeat-genuine-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-allowed-delay-form-no10-filing-defeat-genuine-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that exemption under Sections 11 and 12 could not be denied merely due to issues relating to filing of Form No. 10. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant relief in accordance with law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-allowed-delay-form-no10-filing-defeat-genuine-claim.html">Charitable Trust Exemption Allowed as Delay in Form No. 10 Filing cannnot Defeat Genuine Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-allowed-delay-form-no10-filing-defeat-genuine-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charitable Trust Exemption Restored as Delay in Form 10B Filing Alone cannot Defeat Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-restored-delay-form-10b-filing-defeat-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-restored-delay-form-10b-filing-defeat-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80G]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that exemption under Sections 11 and 12 could not be denied solely due to delayed filing of Form 10B. The matter was remanded for verification and grant of eligible exemption.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-restored-delay-form-10b-filing-defeat-claim.html">Charitable Trust Exemption Restored as Delay in Form 10B Filing Alone cannot Defeat Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-trust-exemption-restored-delay-form-10b-filing-defeat-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income Tax Reopening Sustained as Assessee Was Alleged Beneficiary of Accommodation Entries</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-reopening-sustained-assessee-alleged-beneficiary-accommodation-entries.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-reopening-sustained-assessee-alleged-beneficiary-accommodation-entries.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Gujarat High Court upheld reopening of assessment after the Assessing Officer received information linking the assessee to alleged accommodation entries. The Court held that such information constituted tangible material sufficient to form a belief that income had escaped assessment.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-reopening-sustained-assessee-alleged-beneficiary-accommodation-entries.html">Income Tax Reopening Sustained as Assessee Was Alleged Beneficiary of Accommodation Entries</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-reopening-sustained-assessee-alleged-beneficiary-accommodation-entries.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reassessment Notice Upheld as Information on Shell Companies Constituted Tangible Material</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-upheld-information-shell-companies-constituted-tangible-material.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-upheld-information-shell-companies-constituted-tangible-material.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Gujarat High Court upheld reopening of assessment based on information received from the Kolkata Investigation Wing regarding alleged shell companies. The Court held that such information provided tangible material for forming a belief that income had escaped assessment.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-upheld-information-shell-companies-constituted-tangible-material.html">Reassessment Notice Upheld as Information on Shell Companies Constituted Tangible Material</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notice-upheld-information-shell-companies-constituted-tangible-material.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delhi HC Allows Reassessment as DRI Information on Alleged Bogus Purchases Constituted Tangible Material</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-reassessment-dri-information-alleged-bogus-purchases-constituted-tangible-material.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-reassessment-dri-information-alleged-bogus-purchases-constituted-tangible-material.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case concerned reopening of completed income tax assessments based on information received from DRI and Central Excise authorities. The Delhi High Court held that such information constituted tangible material sufficient to justify reassessment proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-reassessment-dri-information-alleged-bogus-purchases-constituted-tangible-material.html">Delhi HC Allows Reassessment as DRI Information on Alleged Bogus Purchases Constituted Tangible Material</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-hc-reassessment-dri-information-alleged-bogus-purchases-constituted-tangible-material.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Dismisses GST Challenge Because Effective Statutory Appeal Remedy Was Available</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-dismisses-gst-challenge-effective-statutory-appeal-remedy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-dismisses-gst-challenge-effective-statutory-appeal-remedy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case concerned a penalty order arising from alleged quantity discrepancies and missing supporting documents. The Supreme Court upheld the High Courts view that factual issues should be examined by the appellate authority rather than through writ proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-dismisses-gst-challenge-effective-statutory-appeal-remedy.html">SC Dismisses GST Challenge Because Effective Statutory Appeal Remedy Was Available</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-dismisses-gst-challenge-effective-statutory-appeal-remedy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calcutta HC Dismissed GST Appeal as Effective Alternative Remedy Was Available</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismissed-gst-appeal-effective-alternative-remedy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismissed-gst-appeal-effective-alternative-remedy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Division Bench held that issues relating to weight discrepancy and penalty involved disputed questions of fact. The Court ruled that such matters should be decided through the statutory appellate mechanism rather than in writ proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismissed-gst-appeal-effective-alternative-remedy.html">Calcutta HC Dismissed GST Appeal as Effective Alternative Remedy Was Available</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismissed-gst-appeal-effective-alternative-remedy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calcutta HC Dismisses GST Writ as Statutory Appeal Remedy Was Available</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismisses-gst-writ-statutory-appeal-remedy.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismisses-gst-writ-statutory-appeal-remedy.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case concerned a challenge to a detention and penalty order passed under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act. The High Court refused to interfere, holding that the petitioner had an effective appellate remedy under Section 107.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismisses-gst-writ-statutory-appeal-remedy.html">Calcutta HC Dismisses GST Writ as Statutory Appeal Remedy Was Available</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/calcutta-hc-dismisses-gst-writ-statutory-appeal-remedy.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meat &amp; Fish Content Above 20% Not Enough for Chapter 16 Classification: Kerala AAAR</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/meat-fish-content-20-percent-chapter-16-classification-rules-kerala-aaar.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/meat-fish-content-20-percent-chapter-16-classification-rules-kerala-aaar.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046975</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Kerala AAAR held that various packaged curries, rice products, and meat-based preparations are classifiable under HSN 21069099. The ruling emphasized that the classification must be based on the nature of the final ready-to-eat product rather than individual ingredients.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/meat-fish-content-20-percent-chapter-16-classification-rules-kerala-aaar.html">Meat &#038; Fish Content Above 20% Not Enough for Chapter 16 Classification: Kerala AAAR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/meat-fish-content-20-percent-chapter-16-classification-rules-kerala-aaar.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Payable on Wetland Conversion Fee as Land Conversion Is Not a Panchayat Function: AAAR Kerala</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-payable-wetland-conversion-fee-land-conversion-panchayat-function-aaar-kerala.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-payable-wetland-conversion-fee-land-conversion-panchayat-function-aaar-kerala.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Kerala AAAR held that fees paid to convert wetland into dry land are subject to GST under reverse charge. The Authority ruled that land conversion is distinct from land improvement and is not covered by the Panchayat-function exemption under Article 243G.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-payable-wetland-conversion-fee-land-conversion-panchayat-function-aaar-kerala.html">GST Payable on Wetland Conversion Fee as Land Conversion Is Not a Panchayat Function: AAAR Kerala</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-payable-wetland-conversion-fee-land-conversion-panchayat-function-aaar-kerala.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AAAR Declines to Rule on GST Exemption as Parallel Section 73 Proceedings Had Already Been Adjudicated</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/aaar-declines-rule-gst-exemption-parallel-section-73-proceedings-adjudicated.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/aaar-declines-rule-gst-exemption-parallel-section-73-proceedings-adjudicated.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 12:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority found that the underlying GST dispute had already been addressed in adjudication proceedings. To maintain judicial propriety, it declined to record findings on exemption eligibility.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/aaar-declines-rule-gst-exemption-parallel-section-73-proceedings-adjudicated.html">AAAR Declines to Rule on GST Exemption as Parallel Section 73 Proceedings Had Already Been Adjudicated</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/aaar-declines-rule-gst-exemption-parallel-section-73-proceedings-adjudicated.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on Goa PWD Permission, Road Cutting &amp; Ground Rent Charges Payable Under RCM</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-goa-pwd-permission-road-cutting-ground-rent-charges-payable-rcm.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-goa-pwd-permission-road-cutting-ground-rent-charges-payable-rcm.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AAAR Goa declined to examine fresh arguments on taxability and upheld the reverse charge liability on charges collected by Goa PWD. The authority held that new issues cannot be raised for the first time at the appellate stage.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-goa-pwd-permission-road-cutting-ground-rent-charges-payable-rcm.html">GST on Goa PWD Permission, Road Cutting &#038; Ground Rent Charges Payable Under RCM</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-goa-pwd-permission-road-cutting-ground-rent-charges-payable-rcm.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supply of Drinking Water to IIT Goa Through Tankers Exempt from GST: AAAR</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supply-drinking-water-iit-goa-tankers-exempt-gst-aaar.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supply-drinking-water-iit-goa-tankers-exempt-gst-aaar.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Goa AAAR held that drinking water supplied through tankers to IIT Goa students is GST-exempt because the exclusion for purified water had already been removed from Entry 99. The ruling emphasizes that the amended notification must be applied for supplies made after 18 July 2022.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supply-drinking-water-iit-goa-tankers-exempt-gst-aaar.html">Supply of Drinking Water to IIT Goa Through Tankers Exempt from GST: AAAR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supply-drinking-water-iit-goa-tankers-exempt-gst-aaar.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brake Hoses ClassifiableUnder HSN 4009 as Essential Character Remains Vulcanized Rubber</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/brake-hoses-classifiableunder-hsn-4009-essential-character-remains-vulcanized-rubber.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/brake-hoses-classifiableunder-hsn-4009-essential-character-remains-vulcanized-rubber.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Haryana AAAR held that Brake Hoses are primarily composed of vulcanized rubber and retain their essential character as rubber hoses. Accordingly, they were classified under HSN 4009 and made taxable at 18% GST.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/brake-hoses-classifiableunder-hsn-4009-essential-character-remains-vulcanized-rubber.html">Brake Hoses ClassifiableUnder HSN 4009 as Essential Character Remains Vulcanized Rubber</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/brake-hoses-classifiableunder-hsn-4009-essential-character-remains-vulcanized-rubber.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST AAAR Denies Export Benefit as Services Were Held to Be Intermediary Services</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-denies-export-benefit-services-held-intermediary-services.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-denies-export-benefit-services-held-intermediary-services.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Haryana AAAR held that consulting and market support services provided to a Malaysian company were intermediary services under the IGST Act. As the place of supply was held to be in India, the services did not qualify as exports or zero-rated supplies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-denies-export-benefit-services-held-intermediary-services.html">GST AAAR Denies Export Benefit as Services Were Held to Be Intermediary Services</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-aaar-denies-export-benefit-services-held-intermediary-services.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Ignored Yet Essential Pillar of Indian Democracy: The Advocate Community</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/essential-pillar-indian-democracy-advocate-community.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/essential-pillar-indian-democracy-advocate-community.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kamthania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article examines the critical role advocates play in safeguarding constitutional rights and ensuring access to justice. It argues that stronger welfare and institutional support for advocates is vital for preserving democracy and the rule of law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/essential-pillar-indian-democracy-advocate-community.html">The Most Ignored Yet Essential Pillar of Indian Democracy: The Advocate Community</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/essential-pillar-indian-democracy-advocate-community.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPDP act 2023 &amp; Role of Tax Advocate</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-2023-role-tax-advocate.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-2023-role-tax-advocate.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kamthania]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Rules 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, including its scope, key definitions, individual rights, and compliance requirements. It highlights how the law strengthens digital privacy while imposing responsibilities on organizations handling personal data.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-2023-role-tax-advocate.html">DPDP act 2023 &#038; Role of Tax Advocate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-2023-role-tax-advocate.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can CMA do Bank Audits in India</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/cma-bank-audits-india.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/cma-bank-audits-india.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shardaassociates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 11:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank audit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article examines whether the Income Tax Amendment Bill, 2026 expanded CMA authority to bank audits. It clarifies that while CMAs gained a larger role in tax-related work, statutory and concurrent bank audits remain reserved for Chartered Accountants.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/cma-bank-audits-india.html">Can CMA do Bank Audits in India</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/cma-bank-audits-india.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bonafide Purchaser’s Dilemma Under GST: Has Gujarat HC Court Shut the Door?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bonafide-purchasers-dilemma-gst-gujarat-hc-shut-door.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bonafide-purchasers-dilemma-gst-gujarat-hc-shut-door.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hxr740]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Gujarat High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act, holding that ITC is unavailable if the supplier fails to deposit GST. The key takeaway is that bona fide purchasers remain subject to statutory ITC conditions despite having fulfilled their own obligations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bonafide-purchasers-dilemma-gst-gujarat-hc-shut-door.html">Bonafide Purchaser&#8217;s Dilemma Under GST: Has Gujarat HC Court Shut the Door?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/bonafide-purchasers-dilemma-gst-gujarat-hc-shut-door.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assignment of Leasehold Rights Is Transfer of Immovable Property, Not a Service: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/assignment-leasehold-rights-transfer-immovable-property-service-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/assignment-leasehold-rights-transfer-immovable-property-service-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shweta Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court held that assignment of leasehold rights amounts to transfer of an interest in immovable property and not a supply of services. The ruling clarifies that such transactions fall outside the scope of GST.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/assignment-leasehold-rights-transfer-immovable-property-service-bombay-hc.html">Assignment of Leasehold Rights Is Transfer of Immovable Property, Not a Service: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/assignment-leasehold-rights-transfer-immovable-property-service-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Approval Requirements for Related Party Transactions – Listed &amp; Unlisted Companies</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/approval-requirements-related-party-transactions-listed-unlisted-companies.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/approval-requirements-related-party-transactions-listed-unlisted-companies.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vikas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LODR Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Related Party Transactions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains when Audit Committee, Board, and shareholder approvals are required for Related Party Transactions. It provides a practical framework for determining the correct approval level under the Companies Act and SEBI regulations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/approval-requirements-related-party-transactions-listed-unlisted-companies.html">Approval Requirements for Related Party Transactions &#8211; Listed &#038; Unlisted Companies</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/approval-requirements-related-party-transactions-listed-unlisted-companies.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRGI Compliance in India: Rules &amp; Requirements Guide</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/prgi-compliance-india-rules-requirements-guide.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/prgi-compliance-india-rules-requirements-guide.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Compliance Calendar LLP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The PRP Act, 2023 replaced the old RNI framework with a fully digital compliance system administered by PRGI. Publishers must now comply with registration, annual filing, and disclosure requirements to avoid penalties and cancellation risks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/prgi-compliance-india-rules-requirements-guide.html">PRGI Compliance in India: Rules &#038; Requirements Guide</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/prgi-compliance-india-rules-requirements-guide.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Role of Health Insurance in Safeguarding Your Family’s Financial &amp; Lifestyle Aspirations</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/role-health-insurance-safeguarding-familys-financial-lifestyle-aspirations.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/role-health-insurance-safeguarding-familys-financial-lifestyle-aspirations.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Planning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how hospitalisation and treatment costs can affect savings meant for education, housing, and retirement. It highlights the role of family health insurance in shielding financial plans from unexpected medical expenses.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/role-health-insurance-safeguarding-familys-financial-lifestyle-aspirations.html">Role of Health Insurance in Safeguarding Your Family&#8217;s Financial &#038; Lifestyle Aspirations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/role-health-insurance-safeguarding-familys-financial-lifestyle-aspirations.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Borrowing by Private Limited Companies under Companies Act, 2013</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/borrowing-by-private-limited-companies-under-companies-act-2013.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/borrowing-by-private-limited-companies-under-companies-act-2013.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jyoti Mittal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046960</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains when private companies can rely on MCA exemptions to borrow through board approval alone. It highlights the borrowing thresholds and default conditions that determine whether shareholder approval is required.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/borrowing-by-private-limited-companies-under-companies-act-2013.html">Borrowing by Private Limited Companies under Companies Act, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/borrowing-by-private-limited-companies-under-companies-act-2013.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Upholds NI Act Prosecution of Office Bearers Who Signed Loan Documents Despite Not Signing Dishonoured Cheque</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/sc-ni-act-prosecution-continue-loan-document-signatories-office.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/sc-ni-act-prosecution-continue-loan-document-signatories-office.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 09:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiable Instruments Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1047020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court ruled that vicarious liability under the NI Act cannot arise solely from holding an office in a society or company. The key test is whether there is specific material showing involvement in the conduct of the entity’s affairs and the transaction in question.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/sc-ni-act-prosecution-continue-loan-document-signatories-office.html">SC Upholds NI Act Prosecution of Office Bearers Who Signed Loan Documents Despite Not Signing Dishonoured Cheque</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/sc-ni-act-prosecution-continue-loan-document-signatories-office.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>₹50.13 Lakh Seized Cash Held Benami; Subsequent ITR Filing Cannot Defeat Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rs-50-13-lakh-cash-seized-police-treated-benami-property-filing-itr-defeat-benami-proceedings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rs-50-13-lakh-cash-seized-police-treated-benami-property-filing-itr-defeat-benami-proceedings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 09:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The key issue was whether cash falls within the definition of property under the PBPT Act. The Tribunal ruled that cash is a tangible movable asset and may be confiscated as benami property when ownership and source remain unverified.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rs-50-13-lakh-cash-seized-police-treated-benami-property-filing-itr-defeat-benami-proceedings.html">₹50.13 Lakh Seized Cash Held Benami; Subsequent ITR Filing Cannot Defeat Proceedings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rs-50-13-lakh-cash-seized-police-treated-benami-property-filing-itr-defeat-benami-proceedings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FEMA Tribunal Lifts Property Seizure After Repatriation; Section 37A Not for Perpetual Attachment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/fema-tribunal-lifts-seizure-indian-property-repatriation-foreign-asset-section-37a-meant-perpetual-seizure.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/fema-tribunal-lifts-seizure-indian-property-repatriation-foreign-asset-section-37a-meant-perpetual-seizure.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 09:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case examined whether Indian assets could remain seized after foreign asset value was repatriated. The Tribunal ruled that once the objective of Section 37A is fulfilled, continued attachment loses its basis.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/fema-tribunal-lifts-seizure-indian-property-repatriation-foreign-asset-section-37a-meant-perpetual-seizure.html">FEMA Tribunal Lifts Property Seizure After Repatriation; Section 37A Not for Perpetual Attachment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/fema-tribunal-lifts-seizure-indian-property-repatriation-foreign-asset-section-37a-meant-perpetual-seizure.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Home Loan: Boon or Burden under New Income Tax, 2025</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/home-loan-boon-burden-income-tax-2025.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/home-loan-boon-burden-income-tax-2025.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Husain Tinwala]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Loan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how home loan interest and principal repayments can reduce tax liability under the old tax regime. It also highlights why the new regime may limit these benefits for many borrowers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/home-loan-boon-burden-income-tax-2025.html">Home Loan: Boon or Burden under New Income Tax, 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/home-loan-boon-burden-income-tax-2025.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>True Nature of CCDs: Liability, Equity or Judicial Ambiguity?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/true-nature-ccds-liability-equity-judicial-ambiguity.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/true-nature-ccds-liability-equity-judicial-ambiguity.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ind AS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article argues that Compulsorily Convertible Debentures qualify as financial liabilities under Ind AS 32. It explains why certain judicial remarks treating CCDs as equity may be non-binding obiter dicta rather than authoritative legal principles.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/true-nature-ccds-liability-equity-judicial-ambiguity.html">True Nature of CCDs: Liability, Equity or Judicial Ambiguity?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/true-nature-ccds-liability-equity-judicial-ambiguity.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IBC resolution process facilitated realisation of over ₹4 lakh crore for creditors</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibc-resolution-process-facilitated-realisation-rs-4-lakh-crore-creditors.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibc-resolution-process-facilitated-realisation-rs-4-lakh-crore-creditors.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046894</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Ministry of Corporate Affairs highlighted that the IBC resolution process facilitated creditor recoveries exceeding ₹4 lakh crore by March 2026. The milestone demonstrates the Code’s effectiveness in maximizing value and improving insolvency outcomes.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibc-resolution-process-facilitated-realisation-rs-4-lakh-crore-creditors.html">IBC resolution process facilitated realisation of over ₹4 lakh crore for creditors</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ibc-resolution-process-facilitated-realisation-rs-4-lakh-crore-creditors.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DPDP Act : Digital Privacy is Now a Legal Right</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-digital-privacy-legal.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-digital-privacy-legal.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[carishi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Rules 2025]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The DPDP Act, 2023 creates a legal framework for collecting, processing, and protecting digital personal data in India. Learn the rights of individuals, obligations of businesses, and penalties for non-compliance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-digital-privacy-legal.html">DPDP Act : Digital Privacy is Now a Legal Right</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dpdp-act-digital-privacy-legal.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAFEMA directs Bank Account Release on Deposit of Alleged Crime Proceeds</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-orders-release-attached-bank-account-deposit-alleged-proceeds-crime.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-orders-release-attached-bank-account-deposit-alleged-proceeds-crime.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The appellant claimed the disputed funds were received unknowingly and had attempted to return them. The Tribunal granted relief by ordering release of the attached account after deposit of the entire disputed sum.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-orders-release-attached-bank-account-deposit-alleged-proceeds-crime.html">SAFEMA directs Bank Account Release on Deposit of Alleged Crime Proceeds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-orders-release-attached-bank-account-deposit-alleged-proceeds-crime.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US vs India Corporate Tax: The Compliance Gap MNCs Underestimate</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-vs-india-corporate-tax-compliance-gap-mncs-underestimate.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-vs-india-corporate-tax-compliance-gap-mncs-underestimate.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Abhinav Vats]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international taxation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Focusing solely on the federal corporate tax rate can lead to major compliance surprises. Businesses entering the US must also navigate complex state and local tax obligations that vary widely by jurisdiction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-vs-india-corporate-tax-compliance-gap-mncs-underestimate.html">US vs India Corporate Tax: The Compliance Gap MNCs Underestimate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-vs-india-corporate-tax-compliance-gap-mncs-underestimate.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Stock Auditors Must Check Licence Validity Alongside Inventory?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/stock-auditors-check-licence-validity-inventory.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/stock-auditors-check-licence-validity-inventory.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Neeraj Rastogi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 07:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A perfect stock valuation can still conceal serious lending risks if critical operating licences have expired. Auditors should verify licence validity to identify threats to a bank’s security.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/stock-auditors-check-licence-validity-inventory.html">Why Stock Auditors Must Check Licence Validity Alongside Inventory?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/stock-auditors-check-licence-validity-inventory.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critical Issues In First Appeal And Second Appeal Under GST</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/critical-issues-first-appeal-second-appeal-gst.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/critical-issues-first-appeal-second-appeal-gst.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gstrajender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 07:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax appeal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046887</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how limitation under Sections 107 and 112 is calculated from communication of orders and why delayed appeals face serious risks. It highlights the importance of preserving proof of service and complying with statutory timelines.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/critical-issues-first-appeal-second-appeal-gst.html">Critical Issues In First Appeal And Second Appeal Under GST</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/critical-issues-first-appeal-second-appeal-gst.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mere Relationship to Alleged Betting Operator Not Enough to Freeze Assets: SAFEMA</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-releases-sisters-bank-accounts-suspicion.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-releases-sisters-bank-accounts-suspicion.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 07:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046877</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that bank accounts cannot remain frozen merely because the account holder is related to a suspect or under investigation. The ED must first establish a prima facie connection between the property and proceeds of crime.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-releases-sisters-bank-accounts-suspicion.html">Mere Relationship to Alleged Betting Operator Not Enough to Freeze Assets: SAFEMA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pmla-tribunal-releases-sisters-bank-accounts-suspicion.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asset Freeze on Non-Accused Family Members Upheld During Pending PMLA Proceedings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pending-pmla-complaint-justifies-asset-retention-family-assets-freeze-upheld.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pending-pmla-complaint-justifies-asset-retention-family-assets-freeze-upheld.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that retention of seized assets can continue under Section 8(3) when a PMLA prosecution complaint is already pending. The key takeaway is that ED need not file a fresh or supplementary complaint for every newly seized asset.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/pending-pmla-complaint-justifies-asset-retention-family-assets-freeze-upheld.html">Asset Freeze on Non-Accused Family Members Upheld During Pending PMLA Proceedings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/pending-pmla-complaint-justifies-asset-retention-family-assets-freeze-upheld.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Genuine Educational Activities Prevail Over Alleged Irregularities: Delhi ITAT Restores Trust Registration</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-reinstates-charitable-trust-registration-alleged-financial-irregularities-override-genuine-educational-activities.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-reinstates-charitable-trust-registration-alleged-financial-irregularities-override-genuine-educational-activities.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 06:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that registration under Sections 12AA/12AB cannot be cancelled when the trust continues to genuinely carry out its educational objects. Alleged fund diversion and related-party transactions must be examined during assessment and taxation proceedings instead.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-reinstates-charitable-trust-registration-alleged-financial-irregularities-override-genuine-educational-activities.html">Genuine Educational Activities Prevail Over Alleged Irregularities: Delhi ITAT Restores Trust Registration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delhi-itat-reinstates-charitable-trust-registration-alleged-financial-irregularities-override-genuine-educational-activities.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Encashment Disallowance Set Aside as Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit Was Recognized</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-disallowance-set-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-recognized.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-disallowance-set-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-recognized.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046988</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT set aside the lower authorities’ orders after considering CBDT Notification No. 31/2023, which increased the leave encashment exemption limit to ₹25 lakh.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-disallowance-set-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-recognized.html">Leave Encashment Disallowance Set Aside as Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit Was Recognized</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-disallowance-set-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-recognized.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal Succeeds as Beneficial CBDT Notification Applied to Leave Encashment Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-succeeds-beneficial-cbdt-notification-applied-leave-encashment-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-succeeds-beneficial-cbdt-notification-applied-leave-encashment-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT allowed relief after considering CBDT Notification No. 31/2023, which increased the leave encashment exemption limit to ₹25 lakh. The assessment and appellate orders were set aside.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-succeeds-beneficial-cbdt-notification-applied-leave-encashment-claim.html">Appeal Succeeds as Beneficial CBDT Notification Applied to Leave Encashment Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-succeeds-beneficial-cbdt-notification-applied-leave-encashment-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Encashment Addition Deleted as ITAT Applied Revised CBDT Exemption Limit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-tribunal-applied-revised-cbdt-exemption-limit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-tribunal-applied-revised-cbdt-exemption-limit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046978</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that leave encashment of ₹7.65 lakh was fully exempt as it fell within the revised ₹25 lakh ceiling under Notification No. 31/2023. The disallowance made by the lower authorities was deleted.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-tribunal-applied-revised-cbdt-exemption-limit.html">Leave Encashment Addition Deleted as ITAT Applied Revised CBDT Exemption Limit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-tribunal-applied-revised-cbdt-exemption-limit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Encashment Exemption Dispute Remanded as CIT(A) Must Reconsider Claim Afresh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-exemption-dispute-remanded-cita-reconsider-claim-afresh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-exemption-dispute-remanded-cita-reconsider-claim-afresh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication of the leave encashment exemption claim. The assessee was directed to substantiate the claim with supporting material.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-exemption-dispute-remanded-cita-reconsider-claim-afresh.html">Leave Encashment Exemption Dispute Remanded as CIT(A) Must Reconsider Claim Afresh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-exemption-dispute-remanded-cita-reconsider-claim-afresh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retired Bank Employee Gets Relief as Leave Encashment Was Within Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/retired-bank-employee-relief-leave-encashment-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/retired-bank-employee-relief-leave-encashment-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 264]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that leave encashment of ₹6.97 lakh was fully exempt as it fell within the revised ₹25 lakh ceiling under Notification No. 31/2023. The appeal was allowed accordingly.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/retired-bank-employee-relief-leave-encashment-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html">Retired Bank Employee Gets Relief as Leave Encashment Was Within Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/retired-bank-employee-relief-leave-encashment-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Encashment Addition Deleted as CBDT Increased Exemption Ceiling to ₹25 Lakh</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-cbdt-increased-exemption-ceiling-rs-25-lakh.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-cbdt-increased-exemption-ceiling-rs-25-lakh.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 264]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT allowed exemption of the entire leave encashment amount after noting that the revised ₹25 lakh ceiling exceeded the amount received on retirement. The appeal was allowed by applying the enhanced exemption limit.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-cbdt-increased-exemption-ceiling-rs-25-lakh.html">Leave Encashment Addition Deleted as CBDT Increased Exemption Ceiling to ₹25 Lakh</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-addition-deleted-cbdt-increased-exemption-ceiling-rs-25-lakh.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Section 10(10AA) Benefit Granted as Leave Encashment Was Below ₹25 Lakh Threshold</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-section-1010aa-benefit-granted-leave-encashment-rs-25-lakh-threshold.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-section-1010aa-benefit-granted-leave-encashment-rs-25-lakh-threshold.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234D]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that leave encashment of ₹20.29 lakh received on retirement qualified for exemption as it was within the revised ₹25 lakh ceiling. The Assessing Officer was directed to allow the full claim.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-section-1010aa-benefit-granted-leave-encashment-rs-25-lakh-threshold.html">Full Section 10(10AA) Benefit Granted as Leave Encashment Was Below ₹25 Lakh Threshold</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-section-1010aa-benefit-granted-leave-encashment-rs-25-lakh-threshold.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Demand Deleted as Leave Encashment Amount Was Below Revised Exemption Ceiling</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-demand-deleted-leave-encashment-amount-revised-exemption-ceiling.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-demand-deleted-leave-encashment-amount-revised-exemption-ceiling.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT allowed exemption of ₹15.93 lakh towards leave encashment after applying the revised ₹25 lakh ceiling under Notification No. 31/2023. The tax demand raised by the CPC was deleted.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-demand-deleted-leave-encashment-amount-revised-exemption-ceiling.html">Tax Demand Deleted as Leave Encashment Amount Was Below Revised Exemption Ceiling</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tax-demand-deleted-leave-encashment-amount-revised-exemption-ceiling.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Leave Encashment Exemption Allowed as Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit Covered Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80TTA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The dispute concerned restriction of leave encashment exemption to ₹3 lakh. The Tribunal allowed the full claim after applying the revised exemption limit of ₹25 lakh.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-claim.html">Full Leave Encashment Exemption Allowed as Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit Covered Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Leave Encashment Exemption Allowed as Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit Covered Entire Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-entire-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-entire-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ITAT held that leave encashment of ₹17.68 lakh qualified for exemption under Section 10(10AA) since it was within the revised ₹25 lakh ceiling. The appeal was allowed on the basis of the enhanced exemption limit.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-entire-claim.html">Full Leave Encashment Exemption Allowed as Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit Covered Entire Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit-covered-entire-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Full Leave Encashment Exemption Allowed as Claim Was Below Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-claim-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-claim-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 254]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The dispute concerned partial denial of leave encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA). The Tribunal granted relief after finding that the amount claimed fell within the revised exemption limit.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-claim-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html">Full Leave Encashment Exemption Allowed as Claim Was Below Revised ₹25 Lakh Limit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/full-leave-encashment-exemption-allowed-claim-revised-rs-25-lakh-limit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leave Encashment Dispute Remanded as Assessee Was Denied Opportunity of Hearing</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-dispute-remanded-assessee-denied-opportunity-hearing.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-dispute-remanded-assessee-denied-opportunity-hearing.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 04:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leave Encashment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 154]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1046911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The assessee challenged the reduction of leave encashment exemption through a rectification order. The ITAT ruled that the absence of an opportunity of hearing necessitated fresh proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-dispute-remanded-assessee-denied-opportunity-hearing.html">Leave Encashment Dispute Remanded as Assessee Was Denied Opportunity of Hearing</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/leave-encashment-dispute-remanded-assessee-denied-opportunity-hearing.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>