<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in/</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:54:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>Why Bank Loans Get Rejected in India: Practical Reasons &amp; How to Fix Them</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/bank-loans-rejected-india-practical-reasons-fix.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/bank-loans-rejected-india-practical-reasons-fix.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish Gugliya]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Policy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>This explains why bank loans are rejected due to poor documentation, weak financials, and unclear business models. It also highlights practical fixes to improve approval chances.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/bank-loans-rejected-india-practical-reasons-fix.html">Why Bank Loans Get Rejected in India: Practical Reasons &#038; How to Fix Them</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/bank-loans-rejected-india-practical-reasons-fix.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Taxation – IRS Audits</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-irs-audits.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-irs-audits.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subramanian Natarajan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international taxation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The article explains how IRS audits are initiated and conducted to verify tax return accuracy. It highlights taxpayer duties, rights, and possible outcomes, ensuring clarity on compliance requirements and dispute resolution.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-irs-audits.html">US Taxation – IRS Audits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/us-taxation-irs-audits.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advocate Gets Bail in ITC Fraud Case Where Role Limited to Filing Returns</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/advocate-bail-itc-fraud-case-role-limited-filing-returns.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/advocate-bail-itc-fraud-case-role-limited-filing-returns.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a2zbimaljain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Bimal Jain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court examined whether an advocate involved in filing GST returns for fake entities should remain in custody. It granted bail, holding that limited compliance involvement and completed investigation justified release.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/advocate-bail-itc-fraud-case-role-limited-filing-returns.html">Advocate Gets Bail in ITC Fraud Case Where Role Limited to Filing Returns</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/advocate-bail-itc-fraud-case-role-limited-filing-returns.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Imposed Due to Delay in Holding Board Meeting Beyond 120 Days</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-due-delay-holding-board-meeting-120-days.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-due-delay-holding-board-meeting-120-days.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case deals with failure to comply with the mandatory 120-day gap between Board meetings. The authority imposed penalties despite voluntary disclosure, reinforcing strict compliance requirements.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-due-delay-holding-board-meeting-120-days.html">Penalty Imposed Due to Delay in Holding Board Meeting Beyond 120 Days</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-due-delay-holding-board-meeting-120-days.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Introduces IMS Offline Tool to Simplify Bulk Invoice Management</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-introduces-ims-offline-tool-simplify-bulk-invoice-management.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-introduces-ims-offline-tool-simplify-bulk-invoice-management.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The GST portal launches an Excel-based IMS Offline Tool to help taxpayers efficiently manage and process invoices. It enables bulk actions, reduces manual effort, and improves compliance accuracy through structured validation and upload features.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-introduces-ims-offline-tool-simplify-bulk-invoice-management.html">GST Introduces IMS Offline Tool to Simplify Bulk Invoice Management</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-introduces-ims-offline-tool-simplify-bulk-invoice-management.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Quashed Income Tax Assessment Due to Absence of Section 127 Transfer Order</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashed-income-tax-assessment-due-absence-section-127-transfer-order.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashed-income-tax-assessment-due-absence-section-127-transfer-order.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 08:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that failure to issue a jurisdictional transfer order under Section 127 invalidates the assessment. It ruled that absence of such order renders proceedings void ab initio, irrespective of merits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashed-income-tax-assessment-due-absence-section-127-transfer-order.html">ITAT Quashed Income Tax Assessment Due to Absence of Section 127 Transfer Order</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-quashed-income-tax-assessment-due-absence-section-127-transfer-order.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Provision of section 76 of CGST not invocable as GST component already remitted</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provision-section-76-cgst-invocable-gst-component-remitted.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provision-section-76-cgst-invocable-gst-component-remitted.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAPOONAM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038911</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras High Court held that section 76 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are not applicable since GST component is already remitted by GAIL [transmission vertical]. Accordingly, provisions of section 76 of CGST cannot be invoked. Hence, present petition is allowed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provision-section-76-cgst-invocable-gst-component-remitted.html">Provision of section 76 of CGST not invocable as GST component already remitted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/provision-section-76-cgst-invocable-gst-component-remitted.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electrical repair service to government entity exempt from service tax vide notification 25/2012</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/electrical-repair-service-government-entity-exempt-service-tax-vide-notification-25-2012.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/electrical-repair-service-government-entity-exempt-service-tax-vide-notification-25-2012.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAPOONAM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 73]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Allahabad held that electrical repair services provided to governmental entities is exempt from payment of service tax vide notification no. 25/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012. Accordingly, the order is set aside and appeal is allowed.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/electrical-repair-service-government-entity-exempt-service-tax-vide-notification-25-2012.html">Electrical repair service to government entity exempt from service tax vide notification 25/2012</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/electrical-repair-service-government-entity-exempt-service-tax-vide-notification-25-2012.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBIC extends due date of March GSTR-3B to 21st April 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/cbic-extends-due-date-march-gstr-3b-21st-april-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/cbic-extends-due-date-march-gstr-3b-21st-april-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSTR 3B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/cbic-extends-due-date-march-gstr-3b-21st-april-2026.html">CBIC extends due date of March GSTR-3B to 21st April 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/cbic-extends-due-date-march-gstr-3b-21st-april-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CESTAT Allowed SSI Exemption for Failure to Distinguish Trading from Manufacturing Sales</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-allowed-ssi-exemption-failure-distinguish-trading-manufacturing-sales.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-allowed-ssi-exemption-failure-distinguish-trading-manufacturing-sales.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal ruled that the Department failed to prove that goods classified as trading were actually manufactured by the assessee. In absence of proper investigation, excise demand and penalties were held unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-allowed-ssi-exemption-failure-distinguish-trading-manufacturing-sales.html">CESTAT Allowed SSI Exemption for Failure to Distinguish Trading from Manufacturing Sales</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cestat-allowed-ssi-exemption-failure-distinguish-trading-manufacturing-sales.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Dismisses Appeal Due to Delay, HC Ruling on No PE and Offshore Taxability Stands</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-appeal-due-delay-hc-ruling-pe-offshore-taxability-stands.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-appeal-due-delay-hc-ruling-pe-offshore-taxability-stands.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039033</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court declined to condone delay, thereby upholding the High Court’s conclusion that the liaison office did not constitute a PE. The High Court found activities to be preparatory in nature. The ruling highlights strict standards for establishing PE in India.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-appeal-due-delay-hc-ruling-pe-offshore-taxability-stands.html">SC Dismisses Appeal Due to Delay, HC Ruling on No PE and Offshore Taxability Stands</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismisses-appeal-due-delay-hc-ruling-pe-offshore-taxability-stands.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offshore Supply Income Not Taxable in India Due to Absence of Business Connection: Delhi HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/offshore-supply-income-taxable-india-due-absence-business-connection-delhi-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/offshore-supply-income-taxable-india-due-absence-business-connection-delhi-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 90]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The judgment confirms that income from offshore equipment supply is not taxable where transactions occur outside India. The liaison office was also held not to create a taxable presence. The case highlights limits of tax jurisdiction over cross-border supplies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/offshore-supply-income-taxable-india-due-absence-business-connection-delhi-hc.html">Offshore Supply Income Not Taxable in India Due to Absence of Business Connection: Delhi HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/offshore-supply-income-taxable-india-due-absence-business-connection-delhi-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income Tax Appeal Reinstated as Delay due to Bona Fide Belief &amp; COVID-19 Disruption</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-appeal-reinstated-delay-due-bona-fide-belief-covid-19-disruption.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-appeal-reinstated-delay-due-bona-fide-belief-covid-19-disruption.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that lack of awareness of the assessment order and limited knowledge of tax law constituted sufficient cause for delay. The matter was restored for reconsideration on merits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-appeal-reinstated-delay-due-bona-fide-belief-covid-19-disruption.html">Income Tax Appeal Reinstated as Delay due to Bona Fide Belief &#038; COVID-19 Disruption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-appeal-reinstated-delay-due-bona-fide-belief-covid-19-disruption.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reopening Valid Where Income Escapement Based on Search-Derived Information</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-valid-income-escapement-based-search-derived-information.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-valid-income-escapement-based-search-derived-information.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal confirmed addition of unexplained investments where the assessee could not substantiate the source of deposits. The ruling reinforces the burden of proof on the taxpayer.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-valid-income-escapement-based-search-derived-information.html">Reopening Valid Where Income Escapement Based on Search-Derived Information</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reopening-valid-income-escapement-based-search-derived-information.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wage Arrears Deduction Allowed as Liability Accrued from Pay Revision Effective Date</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/wage-arrears-deduction-allowed-liability-accrued-pay-revision-effective-date.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/wage-arrears-deduction-allowed-liability-accrued-pay-revision-effective-date.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that wage arrears arising from pay revision constitute an accrued liability from the effective date. The provision was allowed despite later payment and quantification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/wage-arrears-deduction-allowed-liability-accrued-pay-revision-effective-date.html">Wage Arrears Deduction Allowed as Liability Accrued from Pay Revision Effective Date</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/wage-arrears-deduction-allowed-liability-accrued-pay-revision-effective-date.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AI in GST: Powerful Tool, Unready Taxpayers: Risks of Algorithmic Judgement</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/ai-gst-powerful-tool-unready-taxpayers-risks-algorithmic-judgement.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/ai-gst-powerful-tool-unready-taxpayers-risks-algorithmic-judgement.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S PRASAD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The increasing use of AI in GST is leading to automated mismatch alerts and notices based on flawed data. The key takeaway is that reliance on inaccurate systems can result in unjust tax demands for genuine taxpayers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/ai-gst-powerful-tool-unready-taxpayers-risks-algorithmic-judgement.html">AI in GST: Powerful Tool, Unready Taxpayers: Risks of Algorithmic Judgement</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/ai-gst-powerful-tool-unready-taxpayers-risks-algorithmic-judgement.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No TDS on Transport Payments: Declaration Format Under Income Tax Act 2025</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-transport-payments-declaration-format-income-tax-act-2025.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-transport-payments-declaration-format-income-tax-act-2025.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kraajagopal80@gmail.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Transporters can avoid TDS deduction by submitting a declaration confirming ownership of not more than ten goods vehicles. The key takeaway is that proper documentation ensures compliance and prevents unnecessary tax deduction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-transport-payments-declaration-format-income-tax-act-2025.html">No TDS on Transport Payments: Declaration Format Under Income Tax Act 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/tds-transport-payments-declaration-format-income-tax-act-2025.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on IPL: Sport or High-Octane Entertainment — 18% vs 40%?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-ipl-sport-high-octane-entertainment-18-percent-vs-40.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-ipl-sport-high-octane-entertainment-18-percent-vs-40.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Shivani Gupta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>IPL franchises have contested the 40% GST rate, arguing it wrongly classifies matches as entertainment instead of sporting events. The key takeaway is that tax treatment depends on classification, which directly impacts applicable GST rates.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-ipl-sport-high-octane-entertainment-18-percent-vs-40.html">GST on IPL: Sport or High-Octane Entertainment — 18% vs 40%?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-ipl-sport-high-octane-entertainment-18-percent-vs-40.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ambiguity in NCLAT Orders Not a Complete Defence for IRP Against Regulatory Penalty: IBBI</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ambiguity-nclat-orders-complete-defence-irp-regulatory-penalty-ibbi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ambiguity-nclat-orders-complete-defence-irp-regulatory-penalty-ibbi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority held that confusion arising from interim orders did not absolve the professional from taking proactive steps. The case reinforces the expectation of due diligence in insolvency proceedings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ambiguity-nclat-orders-complete-defence-irp-regulatory-penalty-ibbi.html">Ambiguity in NCLAT Orders Not a Complete Defence for IRP Against Regulatory Penalty: IBBI</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/ambiguity-nclat-orders-complete-defence-irp-regulatory-penalty-ibbi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customs Issues Procedure for Returned Export Cargo Due to Strait of Hormuz Disruption</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-issues-procedure-returned-export-cargo-due-strait-hormuz-disruption.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-issues-procedure-returned-export-cargo-due-strait-hormuz-disruption.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The notice outlines procedures for handling export containers returned due to disrupted maritime routes. It allows simplified clearance without Bill of Entry where seal integrity is verified. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-issues-procedure-returned-export-cargo-due-strait-hormuz-disruption.html">Customs Issues Procedure for Returned Export Cargo Due to Strait of Hormuz Disruption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-issues-procedure-returned-export-cargo-due-strait-hormuz-disruption.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBDT Refutes Allegations of Tax Raid, Terms Claims Baseless; Complaint Filed with Election Commission &amp; Police</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-refutes-allegations-tax-raid-terms-claims-baseless-complaint-filed-election-commission-police.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-refutes-allegations-tax-raid-terms-claims-baseless-complaint-filed-election-commission-police.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The tax department clarified that no search or restriction was carried out against the individual. It termed the allegations baseless and factually incorrect.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-refutes-allegations-tax-raid-terms-claims-baseless-complaint-filed-election-commission-police.html">CBDT Refutes Allegations of Tax Raid, Terms Claims Baseless; Complaint Filed with Election Commission &#038; Police</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cbdt-refutes-allegations-tax-raid-terms-claims-baseless-complaint-filed-election-commission-police.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGFT Launches Online Module Due to Issues in Manual EPCG Scrip Utilization</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-online-module-due-issues-manual-epcg-scrip-utilization.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-online-module-due-issues-manual-epcg-scrip-utilization.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The trade notice introduces an electronic system to resolve difficulties faced in using manually issued EPCG scrips. It enables seamless processing and transmission for better compliance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-online-module-due-issues-manual-epcg-scrip-utilization.html">DGFT Launches Online Module Due to Issues in Manual EPCG Scrip Utilization</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-launches-online-module-due-issues-manual-epcg-scrip-utilization.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBI issues consolidated directions on Digital Payments – E-mandate framework, 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-issues-consolidated-directions-digital-payments-e-mandate-framework-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-issues-consolidated-directions-digital-payments-e-mandate-framework-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Fema / RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reserve bank of india]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The RBI has consolidated all previous e-mandate guidelines into a single framework governing recurring digital payments. The key takeaway is a unified and streamlined regulatory structure with enhanced customer safeguards.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-issues-consolidated-directions-digital-payments-e-mandate-framework-2026.html">RBI issues consolidated directions on Digital Payments – E-mandate framework, 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/rbi/rbi-issues-consolidated-directions-digital-payments-e-mandate-framework-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family Trust Cannot Act as Mutual Fund Sponsor Under SEBI Rules</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/family-trust-act-mutual-fund-sponsor-sebi-rules.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/family-trust-act-mutual-fund-sponsor-sebi-rules.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI clarified that only a body corporate can act as a sponsor under MF Regulations 2026. A family trust, not being a body corporate, is ineligible.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/family-trust-act-mutual-fund-sponsor-sebi-rules.html">Family Trust Cannot Act as Mutual Fund Sponsor Under SEBI Rules</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/family-trust-act-mutual-fund-sponsor-sebi-rules.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Imposed for Delay in Holding First Board Meeting Beyond Statutory Period</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-delay-holding-board-meeting-statutory-period.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-delay-holding-board-meeting-statutory-period.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. The ruling reinforces strict compliance with Section 173(1).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-delay-holding-board-meeting-statutory-period.html">Penalty Imposed for Delay in Holding First Board Meeting Beyond Statutory Period</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-delay-holding-board-meeting-statutory-period.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Imposed for Failure to Mention DIN in Financial Statements Under Companies Act</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-failure-mention-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-failure-mention-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting individuals not associated during the default period.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-failure-mention-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html">Penalty Imposed for Failure to Mention DIN in Financial Statements Under Companies Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-failure-mention-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Imposed for Not Mentioning DIN in Financial Statements Under Companies Act</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-mentioning-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-mentioning-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non-compliance with statutory disclosure requirements attracts monetary penalties under Section 172.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-mentioning-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html">Penalty Imposed for Not Mentioning DIN in Financial Statements Under Companies Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-mentioning-din-financial-statements-companies-act.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procedure for Transfer of Unclaimed Dividend to IEPF under Companies Act, 2013</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-transfer-unclaimed-dividend-iepf-companies-act-2013.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-transfer-unclaimed-dividend-iepf-companies-act-2013.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DR CS RONAK JHUTHAWAT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEPF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investor Education and Protection Fund]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The framework under the Companies Act, 2013 requires companies to transfer unclaimed dividends after seven years to IEPF along with shares. This process includes identification, shareholder intimation, Board approval, and timely filing of prescribed forms.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-transfer-unclaimed-dividend-iepf-companies-act-2013.html">Procedure for Transfer of Unclaimed Dividend to IEPF under Companies Act, 2013</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/procedure-transfer-unclaimed-dividend-iepf-companies-act-2013.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CESTAT Sets Aside ₹352 Cr Service Tax Demand as Coal Mining Held ‘Manufacture’ Not Service</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-sets-rs-352-cr-service-tax-demand-coal-mining-held-manufacture-service.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-sets-rs-352-cr-service-tax-demand-coal-mining-held-manufacture-service.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal ruled that coal extraction and processing constitute manufacture, not mining services, making service tax demand unsustainable and reinforcing mutual exclusivity of tax levies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-sets-rs-352-cr-service-tax-demand-coal-mining-held-manufacture-service.html">CESTAT Sets Aside ₹352 Cr Service Tax Demand as Coal Mining Held ‘Manufacture’ Not Service</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/cestat-sets-rs-352-cr-service-tax-demand-coal-mining-held-manufacture-service.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Upholds Section 10A Deduction Despite Wrong Section 10B Claim in Return</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-upholds-section-10a-deduction-wrong-section-10b-claim-return.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-upholds-section-10a-deduction-wrong-section-10b-claim-return.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 10A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 10B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039011</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal supported the CIT(A)s decision to allow a new claim under Section 10A, noting that appellate proceedings are a continuation of assessment and aimed at determining correct tax liability.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-upholds-section-10a-deduction-wrong-section-10b-claim-return.html">ITAT Upholds Section 10A Deduction Despite Wrong Section 10B Claim in Return</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-upholds-section-10a-deduction-wrong-section-10b-claim-return.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Income Tax Refund Cannot be Adjusted When Recovery Is Stayed: Orissa HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-refund-adjusted-recovery-stayed-orissa-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-refund-adjusted-recovery-stayed-orissa-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Refund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court held that adjusting a refund against a disputed demand during the subsistence of a stay order is illegal and arbitrary, directing release of the refund with interest.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-refund-adjusted-recovery-stayed-orissa-hc.html">Income Tax Refund Cannot be Adjusted When Recovery Is Stayed: Orissa HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/income-tax-refund-adjusted-recovery-stayed-orissa-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Allows Fresh Opportunity for 80P Deduction Claim Due to Non-Submission of Evidence</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-fresh-opportunity-80p-deduction-claim-due-non-submission-evidence.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-fresh-opportunity-80p-deduction-claim-due-non-submission-evidence.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that deduction cannot be rejected merely due to absence of supporting evidence without examining merits. It remanded the matter for fresh verification of the claim.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-fresh-opportunity-80p-deduction-claim-due-non-submission-evidence.html">ITAT Allows Fresh Opportunity for 80P Deduction Claim Due to Non-Submission of Evidence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-fresh-opportunity-80p-deduction-claim-due-non-submission-evidence.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITR Filing FY 2025-26: Step by Step Guide for Salaried Professionals</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-filing-fy-2025-26-step-step-guide-salaried-professionals.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-filing-fy-2025-26-step-step-guide-salaried-professionals.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diksha Chawla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITR]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Highlights that selecting the incorrect portal tab can lead to data mismatches and filing errors. Emphasizes the need to use the correct tab under the applicable law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-filing-fy-2025-26-step-step-guide-salaried-professionals.html">ITR Filing FY 2025-26: Step by Step Guide for Salaried Professionals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itr-filing-fy-2025-26-step-step-guide-salaried-professionals.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes Penalty as Both Limbs of Section 271(1)(c) Invoked Together</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-penalty-limbs-section-2711c-invoked.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-penalty-limbs-section-2711c-invoked.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 271(1)(c)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that a penalty notice lacking clarity on whether it relates to concealment or inaccurate particulars is invalid. It ruled that such a defect makes the penalty unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-penalty-limbs-section-2711c-invoked.html">ITAT Deletes Penalty as Both Limbs of Section 271(1)(c) Invoked Together</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-penalty-limbs-section-2711c-invoked.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Custody Not Required as Trial Likely to Take Time, HC Grants Bail in Fake ITC Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/custody-required-trial-time-hc-grants-bail-fake-itc-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/custody-required-trial-time-hc-grants-bail-fake-itc-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake ITC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039015</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Considering the duration of custody and the likely delay in trial, the Court found continued detention unnecessary. It granted bail while noting that the case would be decided on merits later.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/custody-required-trial-time-hc-grants-bail-fake-itc-case.html">Custody Not Required as Trial Likely to Take Time, HC Grants Bail in Fake ITC Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/custody-required-trial-time-hc-grants-bail-fake-itc-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>HC Orders Railways to Pay Restoration Costs for Misuse of Private Land</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-orders-railways-pay-restoration-costs-misuse-private-land.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-orders-railways-pay-restoration-costs-misuse-private-land.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The court directed payment for restoration costs after authorities admitted using private land. It held that such use affecting land fertility warrants compensation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-orders-railways-pay-restoration-costs-misuse-private-land.html">HC Orders Railways to Pay Restoration Costs for Misuse of Private Land</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/hc-orders-railways-pay-restoration-costs-misuse-private-land.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Deletes AMP Adjustment, Rejects Bright Line Test Following HC Precedents in Louis Vuitton case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-amp-adjustment-rejects-bright-line-test-hc-precedents-louis-vuitton-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-amp-adjustment-rejects-bright-line-test-hc-precedents-louis-vuitton-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 43B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038992</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that BLT cannot be used for transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenses. It ruled that no adjustment was warranted based on binding precedents.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-amp-adjustment-rejects-bright-line-test-hc-precedents-louis-vuitton-case.html">ITAT Deletes AMP Adjustment, Rejects Bright Line Test Following HC Precedents in Louis Vuitton case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-deletes-amp-adjustment-rejects-bright-line-test-hc-precedents-louis-vuitton-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MAT Not Applicable as Bank Not Formed Under Companies Act: ITAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mat-applicable-bank-formed-companies-act-itat-kolkata.html</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Alternate Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal set aside additions to book profit after ruling that MAT provisions do not apply to banks established under a special statute. It emphasized that such entities are not companies under the Companies Act.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mat-applicable-bank-formed-companies-act-itat-kolkata.html">MAT Not Applicable as Bank Not Formed Under Companies Act: ITAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Service Tax Demand Invalid Where Excise Duty Already Paid on Goods: CESTAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-invalid-excise-duty-paid-goods-cestat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-invalid-excise-duty-paid-goods-cestat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that including income from scrap sale, already subject to excise duty, in service tax valuation would lead to double taxation. It ruled that such addition is not permissible and set aside the demand.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-invalid-excise-duty-paid-goods-cestat-kolkata.html">Service Tax Demand Invalid Where Excise Duty Already Paid on Goods: CESTAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-invalid-excise-duty-paid-goods-cestat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charging cases for Hering aids without built-in power conversion not classifiable as static converters</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/charging-cases-hering-aids-built-in-power-conversion-classifiable-static-converters.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/charging-cases-hering-aids-built-in-power-conversion-classifiable-static-converters.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal ruled that when customs authorities had examined and accepted the classification earlier, suppression of facts cannot be alleged. The extended period of limitation was therefore held to be invalid.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/charging-cases-hering-aids-built-in-power-conversion-classifiable-static-converters.html">Charging cases for Hering aids without built-in power conversion not classifiable as static converters</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/charging-cases-hering-aids-built-in-power-conversion-classifiable-static-converters.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 68 Addition Deleted Due to Lack of Evidence of Bogus Transactions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-deleted-due-lack-evidence-bogus-transactions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-deleted-due-lack-evidence-bogus-transactions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44AD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that mere suspicion of bogus transactions without supporting evidence cannot justify addition under section 68. Proper documentation of sales and purchases led to deletion of the addition.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-deleted-due-lack-evidence-bogus-transactions.html">Section 68 Addition Deleted Due to Lack of Evidence of Bogus Transactions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-deleted-due-lack-evidence-bogus-transactions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>CESTAT Remands Case Due to Ambiguity in LOP Affecting Duty Exemption</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-remands-case-due-ambiguity-lop-affecting-duty-exemption.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-remands-case-due-ambiguity-lop-affecting-duty-exemption.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal remanded the matter to clarify whether import of fabrics was permitted under the Letter of Permission. The ruling highlights the impact of unclear authorizations on exemption claims.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-remands-case-due-ambiguity-lop-affecting-duty-exemption.html">CESTAT Remands Case Due to Ambiguity in LOP Affecting Duty Exemption</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/cestat-remands-case-due-ambiguity-lop-affecting-duty-exemption.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delay in Claiming Investment Allowance Not a Ground for Rejection Without Proper Verification</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delay-claiming-investment-allowance-ground-rejection-proper-verification.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delay-claiming-investment-allowance-ground-rejection-proper-verification.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 115JB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that delay alone cannot justify rejection of a statutory deduction claim raised in appeal. It directed fresh verification to determine eligibility on merits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delay-claiming-investment-allowance-ground-rejection-proper-verification.html">Delay in Claiming Investment Allowance Not a Ground for Rejection Without Proper Verification</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/delay-claiming-investment-allowance-ground-rejection-proper-verification.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Service Tax on works contract &amp; manpower services integrally linked to electricity transmission</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-works-contract-manpower-services-integrally-linked-electricity-transmission.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-works-contract-manpower-services-integrally-linked-electricity-transmission.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that works contract and manpower services were integrally linked to electricity transmission. It ruled such services are covered under the negative list exemption.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-works-contract-manpower-services-integrally-linked-electricity-transmission.html">No Service Tax on works contract &#038; manpower services integrally linked to electricity transmission</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-works-contract-manpower-services-integrally-linked-electricity-transmission.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands Case as Fresh Claim Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to Delay</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-fresh-claim-rejected-solely-due-delay.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-fresh-claim-rejected-solely-due-delay.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that a claim admitted at the appellate stage must be examined on merits and cannot be denied merely due to time lapse. The case was remanded for fresh verification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-fresh-claim-rejected-solely-due-delay.html">ITAT Remands Case as Fresh Claim Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to Delay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-fresh-claim-rejected-solely-due-delay.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amortised Value of Moulds Includible in Assessable Value as Additional Consideration: CESTAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amortised-moulds-includible-assessable-additional-consideration-cestat-chennai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amortised-moulds-includible-assessable-additional-consideration-cestat-chennai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038909</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that moulds and dies supplied by customers form part of assessable value as additional consideration. It clarified that their amortised cost must be included in valuation of finished goods.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amortised-moulds-includible-assessable-additional-consideration-cestat-chennai.html">Amortised Value of Moulds Includible in Assessable Value as Additional Consideration: CESTAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amortised-moulds-includible-assessable-additional-consideration-cestat-chennai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash Deposits During Demonetization Not Unexplained When Supported by Books: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-demonetization-unexplained-supported-books-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-demonetization-unexplained-supported-books-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038912</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue was whether demonetization cash deposits were unexplained. The Tribunal held that deposits from recorded business sales cannot be taxed under Section 68.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-demonetization-unexplained-supported-books-itat-delhi.html">Cash Deposits During Demonetization Not Unexplained When Supported by Books: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/cash-deposits-demonetization-unexplained-supported-books-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duty Demand Quashed: DGH Certificate Cannot Add Conditions Beyond Notification</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/duty-demand-quashed-dgh-certificate-add-conditions-notification.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/duty-demand-quashed-dgh-certificate-add-conditions-notification.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEZ]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that exemption cannot be denied based on a re-export condition imposed through a DGH certificate when such a requirement is absent in the notification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/duty-demand-quashed-dgh-certificate-add-conditions-notification.html">Duty Demand Quashed: DGH Certificate Cannot Add Conditions Beyond Notification</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/duty-demand-quashed-dgh-certificate-add-conditions-notification.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Surat Allows Expense Linked to Settled Dues Despite No Business Income </title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-surat-expense-linked-settled-dues-business-income.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-surat-expense-linked-settled-dues-business-income.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 43B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal upheld deletion of expense disallowance after finding that occupation charges were settled during the relevant year. It ruled that such crystallized liabilities are allowable under Section 37(1), dismissing the Revenue’s objections.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-surat-expense-linked-settled-dues-business-income.html">ITAT Surat Allows Expense Linked to Settled Dues Despite No Business Income </a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-surat-expense-linked-settled-dues-business-income.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charitable Status Reconsideration Ordered as Fee-Based Activities Alone Not Grounds for 12AB Rejection</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-status-reconsideration-ordered-as-fee-based-activities-alone-not-grounds-for-12ab-rejection.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-status-reconsideration-ordered-as-fee-based-activities-alone-not-grounds-for-12ab-rejection.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038981</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case addressed whether charging fees negates charitable status. The Tribunal held that this alone cannot justify rejection and ordered re-examination of the application with proper analysis.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-status-reconsideration-ordered-as-fee-based-activities-alone-not-grounds-for-12ab-rejection.html">Charitable Status Reconsideration Ordered as Fee-Based Activities Alone Not Grounds for 12AB Rejection</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/charitable-status-reconsideration-ordered-as-fee-based-activities-alone-not-grounds-for-12ab-rejection.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable When Demand Arises from Audit Records</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/extended-limitation-period-not-applicable-when-demand-arises-from-audit-records.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/extended-limitation-period-not-applicable-when-demand-arises-from-audit-records.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cenvat credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The order highlights that both improper issuance of notices and incorrect application of law led to invalid recovery proceedings. The Tribunal set aside the demand and granted relief to the appellants.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/extended-limitation-period-not-applicable-when-demand-arises-from-audit-records.html">Extended Limitation Period Not Applicable When Demand Arises from Audit Records</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/extended-limitation-period-not-applicable-when-demand-arises-from-audit-records.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST SCNs Invalid Without Specific Allegations of Suppression</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scns-invalid-without-specific-allegations-of-suppression.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scns-invalid-without-specific-allegations-of-suppression.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohan1983]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains that vague show cause notices lacking details of suppression violate legal principles. Highlights that extended limitation and penalties require clear proof of intent.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scns-invalid-without-specific-allegations-of-suppression.html">GST SCNs Invalid Without Specific Allegations of Suppression</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-scns-invalid-without-specific-allegations-of-suppression.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Refund on Export of Goods – Understanding Adjusted Total Turnover</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-export-goods-understanding-adjusted-total-turnover.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-export-goods-understanding-adjusted-total-turnover.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anuj Gandhi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Refund]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Clarifies that export value used in refund calculation must be consistently applied in both numerator and denominator. Highlights that inconsistency leads to notices and delays.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-export-goods-understanding-adjusted-total-turnover.html">GST Refund on Export of Goods &#8211; Understanding Adjusted Total Turnover</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-export-goods-understanding-adjusted-total-turnover.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politicians Can’t Be Allowed To Judge Judicial Competence: Delhi HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/politicians-can-t-allowed-judge-judicial-competence-delhi-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/politicians-can-t-allowed-judge-judicial-competence-delhi-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjeev Sirohi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined whether prior orders and perceived bias justified recusal and held they did not. It ruled that unsubstantiated apprehensions cannot form the basis for disqualification of a judge.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/politicians-can-t-allowed-judge-judicial-competence-delhi-hc.html">Politicians Can’t Be Allowed To Judge Judicial Competence: Delhi HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/politicians-can-t-allowed-judge-judicial-competence-delhi-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consolidated GST Notices Referred to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Judicial Views</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/consolidated-gst-notices-referred-larger-bench-due-conflicting-judicial-views.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/consolidated-gst-notices-referred-larger-bench-due-conflicting-judicial-views.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[a2zbimaljain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court examined whether show-cause notices covering multiple financial years are valid and noted divergent High Court rulings. It referred key legal questions to a Larger Bench for final determination.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/consolidated-gst-notices-referred-larger-bench-due-conflicting-judicial-views.html">Consolidated GST Notices Referred to Larger Bench Due to Conflicting Judicial Views</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/consolidated-gst-notices-referred-larger-bench-due-conflicting-judicial-views.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the Taxman’s Address Becomes a Casino Sign</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/taxmans-address-casino-sign.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/taxmans-address-casino-sign.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aksh Yogendra Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CGST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IGST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The operators avoided traditional hacking and instead used structural loopholes in website optimisation. The incident shows how technical weaknesses can undermine regulatory frameworks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/taxmans-address-casino-sign.html">When the Taxman’s Address Becomes a Casino Sign</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/taxmans-address-casino-sign.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Selling Trust: The Quiet Problem of Product Mis-Selling in Indian Banking</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/selling-trust-quiet-problem-product-mis-selling-indian-banking.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/selling-trust-quiet-problem-product-mis-selling-indian-banking.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aksh Yogendra Jain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1039019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains how commission-driven incentives in banks lead to mis-selling of financial products. Highlights the need for structural reforms to align sales practices with customer interests.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/selling-trust-quiet-problem-product-mis-selling-indian-banking.html">Selling Trust: The Quiet Problem of Product Mis-Selling in Indian Banking</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/selling-trust-quiet-problem-product-mis-selling-indian-banking.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands Case Due to Lack of Opportunity to Substantiate Bogus Expense Claim</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-due-lack-opportunity-substantiate-bogus-expense-claim.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-due-lack-opportunity-substantiate-bogus-expense-claim.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal set aside the appellate order as the assessee sought another chance to prove the genuineness of expenses. It directed fresh assessment after proper opportunity of hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-due-lack-opportunity-substantiate-bogus-expense-claim.html">ITAT Remands Case Due to Lack of Opportunity to Substantiate Bogus Expense Claim</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-case-due-lack-opportunity-substantiate-bogus-expense-claim.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customs Exemption Allowed Without Correlation for Non-Sensitive Inputs but Subject to DFIA Conditions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-exemption-allowed-correlation-non-sensitive-inputs-subject-dfia-conditions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-exemption-allowed-correlation-non-sensitive-inputs-subject-dfia-conditions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Authority examined whether importers can claim duty exemption without linking input specifications to export goods. It ruled that such correlation is not required for non-sensitive inputs, but exemption is conditional upon strict compliance with DFIA licence terms, including value caps and usage restrictions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-exemption-allowed-correlation-non-sensitive-inputs-subject-dfia-conditions.html">Customs Exemption Allowed Without Correlation for Non-Sensitive Inputs but Subject to DFIA Conditions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-exemption-allowed-correlation-non-sensitive-inputs-subject-dfia-conditions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advance Ruling Rejected as preserved areca nuts Classification Issue Already Settled by HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/advance-ruling-rejected-preserved-areca-nuts-classification-issue-settled-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/advance-ruling-rejected-preserved-areca-nuts-classification-issue-settled-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AAR Rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advance Ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority refused to entertain the application as the classification of provisionally preserved areca nuts was already decided by the High Court. It held that settled judicial precedent bars fresh rulings on identical issues.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/advance-ruling-rejected-preserved-areca-nuts-classification-issue-settled-hc.html">Advance Ruling Rejected as preserved areca nuts Classification Issue Already Settled by HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/advance-ruling-rejected-preserved-areca-nuts-classification-issue-settled-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing DIN in Financial Statements Attracts Penalty Under Companies Act: ROC Kanpur</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/missing-din-financial-statements-attracts-penalty-companies-act-roc-kanpur.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/missing-din-financial-statements-attracts-penalty-companies-act-roc-kanpur.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limiting liability to responsible officers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/missing-din-financial-statements-attracts-penalty-companies-act-roc-kanpur.html">Missing DIN in Financial Statements Attracts Penalty Under Companies Act: ROC Kanpur</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/missing-din-financial-statements-attracts-penalty-companies-act-roc-kanpur.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DIN Not Mentioned in Financial Statements Leads to ROC Penalty</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/din-mentioned-financial-statements-leads-roc-penalty.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/din-mentioned-financial-statements-leads-roc-penalty.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting liability to responsible officers only.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/din-mentioned-financial-statements-leads-roc-penalty.html">DIN Not Mentioned in Financial Statements Leads to ROC Penalty</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/din-mentioned-financial-statements-leads-roc-penalty.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Penalizes Company for DIN Non-Disclosure in Financial Filings</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-penalizes-company-din-non-disclosure-financial-filings.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-penalizes-company-din-non-disclosure-financial-filings.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was treated as a violation of Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while restricting liability to responsible officers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-penalizes-company-din-non-disclosure-financial-filings.html">ROC Penalizes Company for DIN Non-Disclosure in Financial Filings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-penalizes-company-din-non-disclosure-financial-filings.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Imposed Penalty for Failure to Mention DIN in Financial Statements</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposed-penalty-failure-mention-din-financial-statements.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposed-penalty-failure-mention-din-financial-statements.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Authorities held that omission of Directors’ Identification Numbers in financial statements violates statutory requirements under company law. The case highlights that even procedural lapses attract penalties regardless of intent.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposed-penalty-failure-mention-din-financial-statements.html">ROC Imposed Penalty for Failure to Mention DIN in Financial Statements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposed-penalty-failure-mention-din-financial-statements.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company Penalized for Filing Financial Statements Without Director Signatures</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-penalized-filing-financial-statements-director-signatures.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-penalized-filing-financial-statements-director-signatures.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Authorities held that filing financial statements without directors’ signatures violates mandatory provisions under Section 134. The ruling confirms that such procedural lapses attract penalties even if admitted by the company.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-penalized-filing-financial-statements-director-signatures.html">Company Penalized for Filing Financial Statements Without Director Signatures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-penalized-filing-financial-statements-director-signatures.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Directors &amp; Company Liable for Penalty for Filing Unsigned Financial Statements</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/directors-company-liable-for-penalty-for-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/directors-company-liable-for-penalty-for-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority penalized a company for filing financial statements without mandatory director signatures. The ruling reinforces strict compliance requirements under statutory filing provisions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/directors-company-liable-for-penalty-for-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html">Directors &#038; Company Liable for Penalty for Filing Unsigned Financial Statements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/directors-company-liable-for-penalty-for-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Kanpur Imposed Penalty for Filing Unsigned Financial Statements</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-kanpur-imposed-penalty-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-kanpur-imposed-penalty-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The authority penalized a company for filing unsigned financial statements, holding it in violation of statutory requirements. The ruling emphasizes strict adherence to director authentication obligations under company law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-kanpur-imposed-penalty-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html">ROC Kanpur Imposed Penalty for Filing Unsigned Financial Statements</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-kanpur-imposed-penalty-filing-unsigned-financial-statements.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ROC Imposes Penalty for Non-Signing of Financial Statements by Directors</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-penalty-non-signing-financial-statements-directors.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-penalty-non-signing-financial-statements-directors.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Failure to sign financial statements led to penalties under Section 134(8). The order highlights strict compliance requirements and limited relief for small companies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-penalty-non-signing-financial-statements-directors.html">ROC Imposes Penalty for Non-Signing of Financial Statements by Directors</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/roc-imposes-penalty-non-signing-financial-statements-directors.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>RFP Restriction in Banking Software Tender to Authorized Vendors is Justified: CCI</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rfp-restriction-banking-software-tender-authorized-vendors-justified-cci.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rfp-restriction-banking-software-tender-authorized-vendors-justified-cci.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Allegations of an implied anti-competitive agreement between a regulator and a software provider were rejected. The Commission found no material indicating collusion or exclusion of competitors.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rfp-restriction-banking-software-tender-authorized-vendors-justified-cci.html">RFP Restriction in Banking Software Tender to Authorized Vendors is Justified: CCI</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rfp-restriction-banking-software-tender-authorized-vendors-justified-cci.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mastermind Arrested for ₹1,825 Crore GST Refund Fraud via Fake ITC &amp; Bogus Exports</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mastermind-arrested-rs-1825-crore-gst-refund-fraud-fake-itc-bogus-exports.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mastermind-arrested-rs-1825-crore-gst-refund-fraud-fake-itc-bogus-exports.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake ITC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Authorities arrested the key accused for orchestrating fake ITC claims and fictitious export transactions. The case highlights strict enforcement against large-scale GST refund fraud using shell entities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mastermind-arrested-rs-1825-crore-gst-refund-fraud-fake-itc-bogus-exports.html">Mastermind Arrested for ₹1,825 Crore GST Refund Fraud via Fake ITC &#038; Bogus Exports</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/mastermind-arrested-rs-1825-crore-gst-refund-fraud-fake-itc-bogus-exports.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Customs Notification 39/2026: Key Entry Removed from Tamil Nadu List</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-notification-39-2026-key-entry-removed-tamil-nadu-list.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-notification-39-2026-key-entry-removed-tamil-nadu-list.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The government has amended customs infrastructure rules by deleting a specific entry for Tamil Nadu. The update signals continued rationalisation of notified customs locations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-notification-39-2026-key-entry-removed-tamil-nadu-list.html">Customs Notification 39/2026: Key Entry Removed from Tamil Nadu List</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-notification-39-2026-key-entry-removed-tamil-nadu-list.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DGFT Extends Interest Subvention to Chapter 72 Goods for MSEs Only</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-interest-subvention-chapter-72-goods-mses.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-interest-subvention-chapter-72-goods-mses.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DGFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DGFT Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The notification includes 167 new tariff lines under Chapter 72 for interest subvention benefits, but restricts eligibility exclusively to Micro and Small Enterprises.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-interest-subvention-chapter-72-goods-mses.html">DGFT Extends Interest Subvention to Chapter 72 Goods for MSEs Only</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/dgft/dgft-extends-interest-subvention-chapter-72-goods-mses.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IFSCA Issues New Cyber Security Rules for IFSC Market Infrastructure Institutions</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/ifsca-issues-new-cyber-security-rules-for-ifsc-market-infrastructure-institutions.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/ifsca-issues-new-cyber-security-rules-for-ifsc-market-infrastructure-institutions.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFSCA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038904</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue concerns enhanced cyber security norms for critical financial institutions. The takeaway is mandatory compliance with a detailed framework to strengthen resilience and protect market integrity.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/ifsca-issues-new-cyber-security-rules-for-ifsc-market-infrastructure-institutions.html">IFSCA Issues New Cyber Security Rules for IFSC Market Infrastructure Institutions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/ifsca-issues-new-cyber-security-rules-for-ifsc-market-infrastructure-institutions.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>India–Korea MoU Signed to Boost Financial Regulatory Cooperation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/india-korea-mou-signed-boost-financial-regulatory-cooperation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/india-korea-mou-signed-boost-financial-regulatory-cooperation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFSCA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue highlights a new agreement between financial regulators of both countries. The key takeaway is that the MoU promotes collaboration, transparency, and stronger financial ecosystems.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/india-korea-mou-signed-boost-financial-regulatory-cooperation.html">India–Korea MoU Signed to Boost Financial Regulatory Cooperation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/india-korea-mou-signed-boost-financial-regulatory-cooperation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Customs Instruction Adds Five Food Import Ports Under FSSAI Framework</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-instruction-adds-food-import-ports-fssai-framework.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-instruction-adds-food-import-ports-fssai-framework.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSSAI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038903</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CBIC updated the list of food import entry points and authorised officers. The instruction adds five new locations and directs implementation of revised FSSAI-linked procedures.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-instruction-adds-food-import-ports-fssai-framework.html">New Customs Instruction Adds Five Food Import Ports Under FSSAI Framework</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/customs-instruction-adds-food-import-ports-fssai-framework.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dormant Company in India –  Legal framework, Procedure and Compliances</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/dormant-company-india-legal-framework-procedure-compliances.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/dormant-company-india-legal-framework-procedure-compliances.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CS Deepak Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains the legal framework of dormant companies under Section 455, including eligibility, process, and reduced compliance benefits. Highlights how businesses can retain corporate identity without full operational obligations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/dormant-company-india-legal-framework-procedure-compliances.html">Dormant Company in India &#8211;  Legal framework, Procedure and Compliances</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/dormant-company-india-legal-framework-procedure-compliances.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Quarterly Compliances for Listed Companies under LODR Regulations</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-quarterly-compliances-listed-companies-lodr-regulations.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-quarterly-compliances-listed-companies-lodr-regulations.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Affluence Advisory Private Limited]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance Calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LODR Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains mandatory quarterly disclosures under SEBI LODR, including financial results, governance reports, and shareholding patterns. Highlights how timely compliance ensures transparency and investor protection.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-quarterly-compliances-listed-companies-lodr-regulations.html">SEBI Quarterly Compliances for Listed Companies under LODR Regulations</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-quarterly-compliances-listed-companies-lodr-regulations.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gender Equality in Workplace: A Critical Analysis of India’s Labour Codes 2019-2020</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gender-equality-workplace-critical-analysis-india-s-labour-codes-2019-2020.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gender-equality-workplace-critical-analysis-india-s-labour-codes-2019-2020.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Basira Viola Ruvarashe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The paper examines whether recent labour law reforms deliver real gender equality or merely formal compliance. It concludes that despite progressive provisions, enforcement gaps and exclusions limit actual impact.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gender-equality-workplace-critical-analysis-india-s-labour-codes-2019-2020.html">Gender Equality in Workplace: A Critical Analysis of India&#8217;s Labour Codes 2019-2020</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gender-equality-workplace-critical-analysis-india-s-labour-codes-2019-2020.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Addition Deleted Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence in Search-Based Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-deleted-due-to-lack-of-corroborative-evidence-in-search-based-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-deleted-due-to-lack-of-corroborative-evidence-in-search-based-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038924</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid. The burden of proof lies on the department.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-deleted-due-to-lack-of-corroborative-evidence-in-search-based-case.html">Addition Deleted Due to Lack of Corroborative Evidence in Search-Based Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/addition-deleted-due-to-lack-of-corroborative-evidence-in-search-based-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is EMI Scheme in Custom? Complete Guide on Duty Deferment, Eligibility &amp; Benefits</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/emi-scheme-custom-complete-guide-duty-deferment-eligibility-benefits.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/emi-scheme-custom-complete-guide-duty-deferment-eligibility-benefits.html#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Ramanujan Sharma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty Notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038920</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Highlights how the EMI Scheme allows businesses to defer duty payments, easing working capital pressure while improving operational efficiency.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/emi-scheme-custom-complete-guide-duty-deferment-eligibility-benefits.html">What is EMI Scheme in Custom? Complete Guide on Duty Deferment, Eligibility &#038; Benefits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/emi-scheme-custom-complete-guide-duty-deferment-eligibility-benefits.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outsourcing in Age of Data Protection: Legal Risks and Responsibilities</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/outsourcing-age-data-protection-legal-risks-responsibilities.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/outsourcing-age-data-protection-legal-risks-responsibilities.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VishnuTandi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DPDP Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains that outsourcing does not transfer legal responsibility under the DPDP Act. Data fiduciaries remain fully liable for vendor-related breaches and compliance failures.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/outsourcing-age-data-protection-legal-risks-responsibilities.html">Outsourcing in Age of Data Protection: Legal Risks and Responsibilities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/outsourcing-age-data-protection-legal-risks-responsibilities.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whether Supplier Can Reduce Output Tax Liability Through Credit Note When Recipient Becomes Unregistered?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supplier-reduce-output-tax-liability-credit-note-recipient-unregistered.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supplier-reduce-output-tax-liability-credit-note-recipient-unregistered.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prince Mittal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains how suppliers may face denial of output tax reduction when recipients cannot reverse ITC after deregistration. Highlights the risk of double tax benefit and need for safeguards.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supplier-reduce-output-tax-liability-credit-note-recipient-unregistered.html">Whether Supplier Can Reduce Output Tax Liability Through Credit Note When Recipient Becomes Unregistered?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/supplier-reduce-output-tax-liability-credit-note-recipient-unregistered.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computerization of Form 121 (Earlier Form 15G &amp; Form 15H)</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/computerization-form-121-earlier-form-15g-form-15h.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/computerization-form-121-earlier-form-15g-form-15h.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 15G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 15H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A new digital framework is suggested to replace manual Form 121 processes and streamline TDS exemption declarations. The proposal highlights improved efficiency, accuracy, and centralized monitoring.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/computerization-form-121-earlier-form-15g-form-15h.html">Computerization of Form 121 (Earlier Form 15G &#038; Form 15H)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/computerization-form-121-earlier-form-15g-form-15h.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Export of Services: Why Using Customs Exchange Rate Is Wrong</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-export-of-services-why-using-customs-exchange-rate-is-wrong.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-export-of-services-why-using-customs-exchange-rate-is-wrong.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anuj Gandhi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A common GST issue in export of services relates to the correct exchange rate for currency conversion, often misunderstood by professionals. Many incorrectly apply the Customs notified exchange rate, which is applicable only to import and export of goods. For services, the correct provision is Rule 34(2) of the CGST Rules, 2017, which mandates that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-export-of-services-why-using-customs-exchange-rate-is-wrong.html">GST Export of Services: Why Using Customs Exchange Rate Is Wrong</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-export-of-services-why-using-customs-exchange-rate-is-wrong.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Imposed for Incorrect AGM Date in AOC-4 Filing Due to Wrong Entry</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-agm-date-aoc-4-filing-due-wrong-entry.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-agm-date-aoc-4-filing-due-wrong-entry.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The ROC penalized the company for reporting an incorrect AGM date in its financial filing. The ruling confirms that even inadvertent errors in statutory forms attract penalties.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-agm-date-aoc-4-filing-due-wrong-entry.html">Penalty Imposed for Incorrect AGM Date in AOC-4 Filing Due to Wrong Entry</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-agm-date-aoc-4-filing-due-wrong-entry.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penalty Imposed for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Despite Rectification Request</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-aoc-4-filing-rectification-request.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-aoc-4-filing-rectification-request.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Editor6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[company law notifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Company Law Penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ministry of corporate affairs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Authorities held that correcting a defective financial statement filing does not remove penalty liability. The ruling reinforces strict accountability for accuracy in MCA filings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-aoc-4-filing-rectification-request.html">Penalty Imposed for Incorrect AOC-4 Filing Despite Rectification Request</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/penalty-imposed-incorrect-aoc-4-filing-rectification-request.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exemption Allowed as Sponsorship and Royalty were Incidental to Charitable Purpose: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/exemption-allowed-sponsorship-royalty-incidental-charitable-purpose-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/exemption-allowed-sponsorship-royalty-incidental-charitable-purpose-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal held that receipts from sponsorship and royalty were incidental to the promotion of sports. It ruled that absence of profit motive prevented application of the proviso to section 2(15), allowing exemption under sections 11 and 12.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/exemption-allowed-sponsorship-royalty-incidental-charitable-purpose-itat-delhi.html">Exemption Allowed as Sponsorship and Royalty were Incidental to Charitable Purpose: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/exemption-allowed-sponsorship-royalty-incidental-charitable-purpose-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Service Tax on Transport Services Without Consignment Notes: CESTAT Allahabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-transport-services-consignment-notes-cestat-allahabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-transport-services-consignment-notes-cestat-allahabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal set aside the demand as time-barred and unsupported by evidence beyond third-party income tax data. It held that absence of fraud or suppression invalidated extended limitation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-transport-services-consignment-notes-cestat-allahabad.html">No Service Tax on Transport Services Without Consignment Notes: CESTAT Allahabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-transport-services-consignment-notes-cestat-allahabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gratuity Deduction Can’t Be Denied for ITR–Audit Report Mismatch Without Verification</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gratuity-deduction-cant-denied-itr-audit-report-mismatch-verification.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gratuity-deduction-cant-denied-itr-audit-report-mismatch-verification.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payment of Gratuity Act 1972]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 43B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038884</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal addressed disallowance arising from mismatch between ITR and tax audit report. It held that inadvertent reporting errors require verification, not outright denial of deduction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gratuity-deduction-cant-denied-itr-audit-report-mismatch-verification.html">Gratuity Deduction Can’t Be Denied for ITR–Audit Report Mismatch Without Verification</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/gratuity-deduction-cant-denied-itr-audit-report-mismatch-verification.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>LLP Compliance – Form 11 – Annual Return of LLP</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/llp-compliance-form-11-annual-return-llp.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/llp-compliance-form-11-annual-return-llp.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CS Shruti Pendharkar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The issue highlights mandatory annual return filing for LLPs. The key takeaway is that delayed filing attracts heavy daily penalties, making timely compliance essential.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/llp-compliance-form-11-annual-return-llp.html">LLP Compliance – Form 11 – Annual Return of LLP</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/llp-compliance-form-11-annual-return-llp.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ITAT Remands ₹1.57 Cr Addition as NRE Deposit Evidence Not Properly Examined</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-1-57-cr-addition-as-nre-deposit-evidence-not-properly-examined.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-1-57-cr-addition-as-nre-deposit-evidence-not-properly-examined.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The case involved additions for unexplained bank deposits where the assessee later produced authenticated NRE account evidence. ITAT remanded the matter, directing fresh consideration of documents and proper opportunity of hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-1-57-cr-addition-as-nre-deposit-evidence-not-properly-examined.html">ITAT Remands ₹1.57 Cr Addition as NRE Deposit Evidence Not Properly Examined</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/itat-remands-rs-1-57-cr-addition-as-nre-deposit-evidence-not-properly-examined.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC dismissed SLP for Delay &amp; Lack of Merit on Interconnect Charges Taxability</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismissed-slp-delay-lack-merit-interconnect-charges-taxability.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismissed-slp-delay-lack-merit-interconnect-charges-taxability.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court dismissed the SLP due to a 390-day delay and absence of valid grounds. The ruling leaves intact the finding that interconnect payments are not royalty.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismissed-slp-delay-lack-merit-interconnect-charges-taxability.html">SC dismissed SLP for Delay &#038; Lack of Merit on Interconnect Charges Taxability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/sc-dismissed-slp-delay-lack-merit-interconnect-charges-taxability.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interconnect Charges Not Royalty: HC Dismisses Revenue Appeal</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/interconnect-charges-royalty-hc-dismisses-revenue-appeal.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/interconnect-charges-royalty-hc-dismisses-revenue-appeal.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038798</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The High Court followed its earlier ruling that interconnect service charges are not taxable as royalty. The Revenues appeal was dismissed due to lack of merit and binding precedent.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/interconnect-charges-royalty-hc-dismisses-revenue-appeal.html">Interconnect Charges Not Royalty: HC Dismisses Revenue Appeal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/interconnect-charges-royalty-hc-dismisses-revenue-appeal.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Valid Basis to Intervene: SC Confirms Quashing of Reassessment Notices</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/valid-basis-intervene-sc-confirms-quashing-reassessment-notices.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/valid-basis-intervene-sc-confirms-quashing-reassessment-notices.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TG Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reassessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court declined to interfere after finding no sufficient reason to disturb the High Court’s decision. The ruling reinforces limits on appellate intervention.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/valid-basis-intervene-sc-confirms-quashing-reassessment-notices.html">No Valid Basis to Intervene: SC Confirms Quashing of Reassessment Notices</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/valid-basis-intervene-sc-confirms-quashing-reassessment-notices.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reassessment Notices Quashed Due to Lack of Tangible Material for PE Allegation</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notices-quashed-due-lack-tangible-material-pe-allegation.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notices-quashed-due-lack-tangible-material-pe-allegation.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent establishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court set aside Section 148 notices after finding no tangible evidence supporting the existence of a Permanent Establishment. The ruling highlights the need for concrete material in reassessment.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notices-quashed-due-lack-tangible-material-pe-allegation.html">Reassessment Notices Quashed Due to Lack of Tangible Material for PE Allegation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-notices-quashed-due-lack-tangible-material-pe-allegation.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excise Duty Refund Denied Due to Excess Realisation Over FOB Value Triggering Unjust Enrichment</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/excise-duty-refund-denied-due-excess-realisation-fob-triggering-unjust-enrichment.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/excise-duty-refund-denied-due-excess-realisation-fob-triggering-unjust-enrichment.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unjust enrichment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal rejected the refund claim after finding that export proceeds exceeded the declared FOB value. It held that such excess creates a presumption of duty being passed on, barring refund.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/excise-duty-refund-denied-due-excess-realisation-fob-triggering-unjust-enrichment.html">Excise Duty Refund Denied Due to Excess Realisation Over FOB Value Triggering Unjust Enrichment</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/excise-duty-refund-denied-due-excess-realisation-fob-triggering-unjust-enrichment.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Service Tax Liability Confirmed on Sub-Contractor Due to Independent Taxability of Services</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-liability-confirmed-sub-contractor-due-independent-taxability-services.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-liability-confirmed-sub-contractor-due-independent-taxability-services.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038783</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs Commissioner (CESTAT Allahabad) The appeal before the Tribunal arose from an Order-in-Appeal upholding a demand of ₹1,95,356 towards Service Tax for the financial year 2015–16, along with interest and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant was registered for providing “Business Auxiliary Services.” Based on [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-liability-confirmed-sub-contractor-due-independent-taxability-services.html">Service Tax Liability Confirmed on Sub-Contractor Due to Independent Taxability of Services</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-liability-confirmed-sub-contractor-due-independent-taxability-services.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amounts Paid During Investigation Treated as Excise Duty After Adjudication, Refund Denied</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amounts-paid-investigation-treated-excise-duty-adjudication-refund-denied.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amounts-paid-investigation-treated-excise-duty-adjudication-refund-denied.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Tribunal ruled that payments made during investigation become duty once appropriated in adjudication. It rejected the argument that such payments remain deposits under protest. The decision reinforces that refund claims for such amounts are subject to limitation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amounts-paid-investigation-treated-excise-duty-adjudication-refund-denied.html">Amounts Paid During Investigation Treated as Excise Duty After Adjudication, Refund Denied</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/amounts-paid-investigation-treated-excise-duty-adjudication-refund-denied.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/mens-rea-misconduct-icai-clears-ca-alleged-bribery-trap-case.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/mens-rea-misconduct-icai-clears-ca-alleged-bribery-trap-case.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[CA, CS, CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chartered accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAI]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAI Board holds CA not guilty in bribery case, finds no proof of knowledge or intent; mere receipt of packet without mens rea not misconduct, proceedings closed under Rule 15(2).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/mens-rea-misconduct-icai-clears-ca-alleged-bribery-trap-case.html">No Mens Rea, No Misconduct: ICAI Clears CA in Alleged Bribery Trap Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/chartered-accountant/mens-rea-misconduct-icai-clears-ca-alleged-bribery-trap-case.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chhattisgarh HC Stayed GST Recovery Subject to Pre-Deposit Compliance</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/chhattisgarh-hc-stayed-gst-recovery-subject-pre-deposit-compliance.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/chhattisgarh-hc-stayed-gst-recovery-subject-pre-deposit-compliance.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 12:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1038814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Court permitted the taxpayer to obtain a stay by following the procedure under Section 112 and relevant CBIC circulars. It emphasized that compliance with pre-deposit and undertaking conditions is mandatory. The decision highlights the role of procedural compliance in securing relief.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/chhattisgarh-hc-stayed-gst-recovery-subject-pre-deposit-compliance.html">Chhattisgarh HC Stayed GST Recovery Subject to Pre-Deposit Compliance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/chhattisgarh-hc-stayed-gst-recovery-subject-pre-deposit-compliance.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>