<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>TaxGuru.in - Daily Newsletter</title>
	<atom:link href="https://taxguru.in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://taxguru.in/</link>
	<description>Daily updates for CA, CS, CMA, MBA, Tax and Account Professionals, Advocates on Amendments in Income Tax, MVAT, Company Law, Service Tax, GST, LLP, DGFT, SEBI, RBI, Excise Duty, Custom Duty,  DTC, Corporate Laws, ICAI, ICSI and ICWAI Regulation, FEMA , Government Policies etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta content="noindex" name="robots" xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/><item>
		<title>Section 147 Reassessment Quashed as No Income Escaped Assessment: ITAT Agra</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-quashed-income-escaped-assessment-itat-agra.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-quashed-income-escaped-assessment-itat-agra.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Agra quashed the Section 147 reassessment, holding the amount alleged to have escaped assessment was already included in the assessee's sale proceeds.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-quashed-income-escaped-assessment-itat-agra.html">Section 147 Reassessment Quashed as No Income Escaped Assessment: ITAT Agra</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-quashed-income-escaped-assessment-itat-agra.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal Dismissed as AR Appeared Without Prescribed Uniform in Virtual Hearing: ITAT Cuttack</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-ar-appeared-prescribed-uniform-virtual-hearing-itat-cuttack.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-ar-appeared-prescribed-uniform-virtual-hearing-itat-cuttack.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057572</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Cuttack dismissed the appeal after noting the assessee's authorised representative appeared virtually without the prescribed uniform under the SOP.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-ar-appeared-prescribed-uniform-virtual-hearing-itat-cuttack.html">Appeal Dismissed as AR Appeared Without Prescribed Uniform in Virtual Hearing: ITAT Cuttack</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/appeal-dismissed-ar-appeared-prescribed-uniform-virtual-hearing-itat-cuttack.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 37 Bogus Purchase &amp; Section 69A Gold Addition Deleted: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-37-bogus-purchase-section-69a-gold-addition-deleted-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-37-bogus-purchase-section-69a-gold-addition-deleted-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai deleted the bogus purchase addition and upheld deletion of the Section 69A gold addition after finding the purchases genuine and the gold recorded in books.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-37-bogus-purchase-section-69a-gold-addition-deleted-itat-mumbai.html">Section 37 Bogus Purchase &#038; Section 69A Gold Addition Deleted: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-37-bogus-purchase-section-69a-gold-addition-deleted-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Revises FVCI Fee Structure &amp; Remittance Process</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-revises-fvci-fee-structure-remittance-process.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-revises-fvci-fee-structure-remittance-process.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI amends FVCI Regulations, 2000 by revising fee amounts, payment timelines and designated depository participant remittance requirements, effective after 180 days.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-revises-fvci-fee-structure-remittance-process.html">SEBI Revises FVCI Fee Structure &#038; Remittance Process</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-revises-fvci-fee-structure-remittance-process.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI Permits Intraday Borrowing Facility for Mutual Funds from 1st September 2026</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-permits-intraday-borrowing-facility-mutual-funds-1st-september-2026.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-permits-intraday-borrowing-facility-mutual-funds-1st-september-2026.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI notifications]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>SEBI allows mutual funds to avail intraday borrowings for specified purposes, subject to conditions, effective from September 1, 2026.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-permits-intraday-borrowing-facility-mutual-funds-1st-september-2026.html">SEBI Permits Intraday Borrowing Facility for Mutual Funds from 1st September 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/sebi/sebi-permits-intraday-borrowing-facility-mutual-funds-1st-september-2026.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Order Set Aside as Passed Against Deceased Person: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-set-passed-deceased-person-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-set-passed-deceased-person-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras HC set aside a GST order passed against a deceased person and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after legal heir's reply.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-set-passed-deceased-person-madras-hc.html">GST Order Set Aside as Passed Against Deceased Person: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-order-set-passed-deceased-person-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interest Demand Challenge Rejected as Barred by Constructive Res Judicata: SC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/interest-demand-challenge-rejected-barred-constructive-res-judicata-sc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/interest-demand-challenge-rejected-barred-constructive-res-judicata-sc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057553</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the challenge to the interest demand was barred after withdrawal of the earlier writ petition.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/interest-demand-challenge-rejected-barred-constructive-res-judicata-sc.html">Interest Demand Challenge Rejected as Barred by Constructive Res Judicata: SC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/interest-demand-challenge-rejected-barred-constructive-res-judicata-sc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 56(2)(x)(b) Addition Remanded for DVO Reference Examination: ITAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-56-2-x-b-addition-remanded-dvo-reference-examination-itat-chennai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-56-2-x-b-addition-remanded-dvo-reference-examination-itat-chennai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Chennai remanded the Section 56(2)(x)(b) addition for fresh examination of DVO reference, condoned delay, and directed payment of ₹10,000 costs.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-56-2-x-b-addition-remanded-dvo-reference-examination-itat-chennai.html">Section 56(2)(x)(b) Addition Remanded for DVO Reference Examination: ITAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-56-2-x-b-addition-remanded-dvo-reference-examination-itat-chennai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SC Issues Notice on Section 107(4) GST Appeal Limitation Cap: Orissa HC Ruling Challenged</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-issues-notice-section-1074-gst-appeal-limitation-cap-orissa-hc-ruling-challenged.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-issues-notice-section-1074-gst-appeal-limitation-cap-orissa-hc-ruling-challenged.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court judgements]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supreme Court issued notice, permitted service on respondents' Standing Counsel and Additional Solicitor General, and listed the matter for 27 July 2026.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-issues-notice-section-1074-gst-appeal-limitation-cap-orissa-hc-ruling-challenged.html">SC Issues Notice on Section 107(4) GST Appeal Limitation Cap: Orissa HC Ruling Challenged</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/sc-issues-notice-section-1074-gst-appeal-limitation-cap-orissa-hc-ruling-challenged.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section GST 107 Appeal Dismissal Upheld as Filed Beyond Statutory Outer Limit: Orissa HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-107-gst-appeal-dismissal-upheld-filed-statutory-outer-limit-orissa-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-107-gst-appeal-dismissal-upheld-filed-statutory-outer-limit-orissa-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Orissa HC upheld dismissal of a GST appeal, holding it was filed beyond the outer limit under Section 107(4) after communication of the order.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-107-gst-appeal-dismissal-upheld-filed-statutory-outer-limit-orissa-hc.html">Section GST 107 Appeal Dismissal Upheld as Filed Beyond Statutory Outer Limit: Orissa HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-107-gst-appeal-dismissal-upheld-filed-statutory-outer-limit-orissa-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai ITAT Allows ESOP Deduction; Discounts on Employee Stock Options Are Not Contingent Liabilities</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-esop-deduction-discounts-employee-stock-options-contingent-liabilities.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-esop-deduction-discounts-employee-stock-options-contingent-liabilities.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 260A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai allowed ESOP deduction under Section 37, holding that ESOP discount is not a contingent liability and directing deletion of the disallowance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-esop-deduction-discounts-employee-stock-options-contingent-liabilities.html">Mumbai ITAT Allows ESOP Deduction; Discounts on Employee Stock Options Are Not Contingent Liabilities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-esop-deduction-discounts-employee-stock-options-contingent-liabilities.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illegal Gratification for leakage of recruitment examination papers: Conviction upheld on corroborated trap evidence despite minor inconsistencies in witness testimony</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/illegal-gratification-leakage-recruitment-examination-papers-conviction-upheld-corroborated-trap-evidence-minor-inconsistencies-witness-testimony.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/illegal-gratification-leakage-recruitment-examination-papers-conviction-upheld-corroborated-trap-evidence-minor-inconsistencies-witness-testimony.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[divyarathi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification, recovery of tainted money, and unlawful transmission of confidential recruitment examination papers. The inconsistencies highlighted by the defence were inconsequential and did not affect the substratum of the prosecution case.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/illegal-gratification-leakage-recruitment-examination-papers-conviction-upheld-corroborated-trap-evidence-minor-inconsistencies-witness-testimony.html">Illegal Gratification for leakage of recruitment examination papers: Conviction upheld on corroborated trap evidence despite minor inconsistencies in witness testimony</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/illegal-gratification-leakage-recruitment-examination-papers-conviction-upheld-corroborated-trap-evidence-minor-inconsistencies-witness-testimony.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Import of E-Rickshaw Components Without Motor and Battery Cannot Be Classified as Complete CKD Vehicles Under Rule 2(a) of GIR</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/import-e-rickshaw-components-motor-battery-classified-complete-ckd-vehicles-rule-2a-gir.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/import-e-rickshaw-components-motor-battery-classified-complete-ckd-vehicles-rule-2a-gir.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[divyarathi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056888</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>E-rickshaw components imported without the electric motor and battery could not be treated as complete E-rickshaws in CKD condition under Rule 2(a) of the General Rules for Interpretation, as they lack the essential character of the finished vehicle.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/import-e-rickshaw-components-motor-battery-classified-complete-ckd-vehicles-rule-2a-gir.html">Import of E-Rickshaw Components Without Motor and Battery Cannot Be Classified as Complete CKD Vehicles Under Rule 2(a) of GIR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/import-e-rickshaw-components-motor-battery-classified-complete-ckd-vehicles-rule-2a-gir.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mumbai ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Wrong Approval U/s 151(ii); Penalties U/s 270A &amp; 271AAC Also Deleted</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-quashes-reassessment-wrong-approval-u-s-151-ii-penalties-u-s-270a-271aac-deleted.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-quashes-reassessment-wrong-approval-u-s-151-ii-penalties-u-s-270a-271aac-deleted.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 151A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 45]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment for approval under Section 151(ii) by the wrong authority and deleted penalties under Sections 270A and 271AAC.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-quashes-reassessment-wrong-approval-u-s-151-ii-penalties-u-s-270a-271aac-deleted.html">Mumbai ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Wrong Approval U/s 151(ii); Penalties U/s 270A &#038; 271AAC Also Deleted</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mumbai-itat-quashes-reassessment-wrong-approval-u-s-151-ii-penalties-u-s-270a-271aac-deleted.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aircraft Lease Income Held Not Taxable Under Article 8 of India-Ireland DTAA: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-article-8-india-ireland-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-article-8-india-ireland-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234B]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai held aircraft lease rentals not taxable in India under Article 8 of the India-Ireland DTAA and found no PE in India.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-article-8-india-ireland-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html">Aircraft Lease Income Held Not Taxable Under Article 8 of India-Ireland DTAA: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-article-8-india-ireland-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aircraft Lease Income Held Not Taxable in India Under Article 8 DTAA: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-india-article-8-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-india-article-8-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai held aircraft lease income and delayed lease payment charges not taxable in India under Article 8 of the India-Ireland DTAA.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-india-article-8-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html">Aircraft Lease Income Held Not Taxable in India Under Article 8 DTAA: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/aircraft-lease-income-held-taxable-india-article-8-dtaa-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DVC’s Differential Tariff and IBC-Linked Claims Referred to Arbitration; Limitation Kept Open: Calcutta HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dvcs-differential-tariff-ibc-linked-claims-referred-arbitration-limitation-open-calcutta-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dvcs-differential-tariff-ibc-linked-claims-referred-arbitration-limitation-open-calcutta-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration and Conciliation Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056731</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calcutta HC appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6), leaving arbitrability, limitation, admissibility of claims, and related issues for the arbitral tribunal.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dvcs-differential-tariff-ibc-linked-claims-referred-arbitration-limitation-open-calcutta-hc.html">DVC’s Differential Tariff and IBC-Linked Claims Referred to Arbitration; Limitation Kept Open: Calcutta HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/dvcs-differential-tariff-ibc-linked-claims-referred-arbitration-limitation-open-calcutta-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 73 SCN Mandatory; DRC-01 Summary Not a Substitute: Gauhati HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-scn-mandatory-drc-01-summary-substitute-gauhati-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-scn-mandatory-drc-01-summary-substitute-gauhati-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gauhati HC held that a DRC-01 summary cannot replace a Section 73(1) SCN, quashed the Order-in-Original, and permitted fresh proceedings with limitation exclusion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-scn-mandatory-drc-01-summary-substitute-gauhati-hc.html">Section 73 SCN Mandatory; DRC-01 Summary Not a Substitute: Gauhati HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-scn-mandatory-drc-01-summary-substitute-gauhati-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FIR Quashing Refused as Forgery &amp; Conspiracy Allegations Require Investigation: Calcutta HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fir-quashing-refused-forgery-conspiracy-allegations-require-investigation-calcutta-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fir-quashing-refused-forgery-conspiracy-allegations-require-investigation-calcutta-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calcutta HC refused to quash an FIR alleging forgery and criminal conspiracy, holding that prima facie cognizable offences required investigation and territorial jurisdiction objections could not defeat the probe.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fir-quashing-refused-forgery-conspiracy-allegations-require-investigation-calcutta-hc.html">FIR Quashing Refused as Forgery &#038; Conspiracy Allegations Require Investigation: Calcutta HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/fir-quashing-refused-forgery-conspiracy-allegations-require-investigation-calcutta-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Exchange Gain Is Operating Income Under TNMM: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-exchange-gain-operating-income-tnmm-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-exchange-gain-operating-income-tnmm-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transfer Pricing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi held foreign exchange gain is operating income under TNMM, remanded TP adjustment, and allowed interest deduction under Section 57(iii).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-exchange-gain-operating-income-tnmm-itat-delhi.html">Foreign Exchange Gain Is Operating Income Under TNMM: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/foreign-exchange-gain-operating-income-tnmm-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remand Report Accepting Assessee’s Explanation Bars Additions: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/remand-report-accepting-assessees-explanation-bars-additions-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/remand-report-accepting-assessees-explanation-bars-additions-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 254]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, holding that additions could not survive after the AO’s remand report accepted the assessee’s explanations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/remand-report-accepting-assessees-explanation-bars-additions-itat-delhi.html">Remand Report Accepting Assessee’s Explanation Bars Additions: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/remand-report-accepting-assessees-explanation-bars-additions-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>One-Time Contractor Settlement Deductible Under Section 37: ITAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/one-time-contractor-settlement-fully-deductible-section-37-itat-chennai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/one-time-contractor-settlement-fully-deductible-section-37-itat-chennai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 35D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Chennai held one-time settlement paid to contractors is fully deductible under Section 37, remanded the Section 14A issue, and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/one-time-contractor-settlement-fully-deductible-section-37-itat-chennai.html">One-Time Contractor Settlement Deductible Under Section 37: ITAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/one-time-contractor-settlement-fully-deductible-section-37-itat-chennai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Typographical Error in Form 10AB Cannot Defeat Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/typographical-error-form-10ab-defeat-section-12ab-registration-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/typographical-error-form-10ab-defeat-section-12ab-registration-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 12AB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai held that an incorrect statutory clause selected in Form 10AB cannot justify rejection of Section 12AB registration without an opportunity to rectify.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/typographical-error-form-10ab-defeat-section-12ab-registration-itat-mumbai.html">Typographical Error in Form 10AB Cannot Defeat Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/typographical-error-form-10ab-defeat-section-12ab-registration-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 264 Revision Quashed for Cursorily Dealing with Contentions: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-264-revision-quashed-cursorily-dealing-contentions-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-264-revision-quashed-cursorily-dealing-contentions-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 264]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gujarat HC quashed a Section 264 revision order and remanded the matter after finding the petitioner's contentions were cursorily dealt with.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-264-revision-quashed-cursorily-dealing-contentions-gujarat-hc.html">Section 264 Revision Quashed for Cursorily Dealing with Contentions: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-264-revision-quashed-cursorily-dealing-contentions-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 151 Sanction by Incorrect Authority Invalidates Section 148 Reassessment: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-151-sanction-incorrect-authority-invalidates-section-148-reassessment-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-151-sanction-incorrect-authority-invalidates-section-148-reassessment-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 151A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056775</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi held that a Section 148 notice issued beyond three years is void when sanctioned by the PCIT instead of the authority prescribed under Section 151.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-151-sanction-incorrect-authority-invalidates-section-148-reassessment-itat-delhi.html">Section 151 Sanction by Incorrect Authority Invalidates Section 148 Reassessment: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-151-sanction-incorrect-authority-invalidates-section-148-reassessment-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 80-IA(9) Restricts Double Deduction Without Reducing Gross Total Income: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ia9-restricts-double-deduction-reducing-gross-total-income-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ia9-restricts-double-deduction-reducing-gross-total-income-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80HHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras HC remanded Section 80-IB and 80-HHC deduction computation, applying SC ruling that Section 80-IA(9) prevents double deduction of eligible profits.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ia9-restricts-double-deduction-reducing-gross-total-income-madras-hc.html">Section 80-IA(9) Restricts Double Deduction Without Reducing Gross Total Income: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ia9-restricts-double-deduction-reducing-gross-total-income-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 68 Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Restricted to ₹2 Lakh: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-demonetisation-cash-deposits-restricted-rs-2-lakh-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-demonetisation-cash-deposits-restricted-rs-2-lakh-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonetization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi restricted the Section 68 addition on demonetisation cash deposits to ₹2 lakh and directed assessment under normal provisions instead of Section 115BBE.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-demonetisation-cash-deposits-restricted-rs-2-lakh-itat-delhi.html">Section 68 Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Restricted to ₹2 Lakh: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-demonetisation-cash-deposits-restricted-rs-2-lakh-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>₹70 Lakh Property Investment Claimed from Husband’s Gift Remanded for Verification: ITAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rs-70-lakh-property-investment-claimed-husbands-gift-remanded-verification-itat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rs-70-lakh-property-investment-claimed-husbands-gift-remanded-verification-itat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271AAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Mumbai remanded a Section 69 addition for fresh verification of the claim that property investment came from husband’s gift funded by FD maturity proceeds.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rs-70-lakh-property-investment-claimed-husbands-gift-remanded-verification-itat-mumbai.html">₹70 Lakh Property Investment Claimed from Husband’s Gift Remanded for Verification: ITAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/rs-70-lakh-property-investment-claimed-husbands-gift-remanded-verification-itat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 74 Invocation Upheld for Wrongful ITC on Blocked Credits: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-invocation-upheld-wrongful-itc-blocked-credits-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-invocation-upheld-wrongful-itc-blocked-credits-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 11:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[input tax credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras HC upheld Section 74 proceedings for blocked ITC under Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d), holding extended limitation valid and dismissing the writ petition.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-invocation-upheld-wrongful-itc-blocked-credits-madras-hc.html">Section 74 Invocation Upheld for Wrongful ITC on Blocked Credits: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-invocation-upheld-wrongful-itc-blocked-credits-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company Property Transfer to Promoters Without Consideration is Fraudulent Preference: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-property-transfer-promoters-consideration-is-fraudulent-preference-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-property-transfer-promoters-consideration-is-fraudulent-preference-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bombay HC held that mutation entries transferring company property without a valid transfer instrument or consideration attracted Section 531 and declared the transaction void.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-property-transfer-promoters-consideration-is-fraudulent-preference-bombay-hc.html">Company Property Transfer to Promoters Without Consideration is Fraudulent Preference: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/company-property-transfer-promoters-consideration-is-fraudulent-preference-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Accounting Clerk Denied Anticipatory Bail in ₹63 Lakh Misappropriation Case: Jharkhand HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/accounting-clerk-denied-anticipatory-bail-rs-63-lakh-misappropriation-case-jharkhand-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/accounting-clerk-denied-anticipatory-bail-rs-63-lakh-misappropriation-case-jharkhand-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056892</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jharkhand HC denied anticipatory bail to an accounting clerk after finding serious allegations of ₹63 lakh misappropriation supported by case diary materials.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/accounting-clerk-denied-anticipatory-bail-rs-63-lakh-misappropriation-case-jharkhand-hc.html">Accounting Clerk Denied Anticipatory Bail in ₹63 Lakh Misappropriation Case: Jharkhand HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/accounting-clerk-denied-anticipatory-bail-rs-63-lakh-misappropriation-case-jharkhand-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Physical GST Notice Mandatory After Registration Cancellation: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/physical-gst-notice-mandatory-registration-cancellation-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/physical-gst-notice-mandatory-registration-cancellation-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Allahabad HC set aside a GST adjudication order, holding that physical notice is required after cancellation of GST registration to ensure a fair hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/physical-gst-notice-mandatory-registration-cancellation-allahabad-hc.html">Physical GST Notice Mandatory After Registration Cancellation: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/physical-gst-notice-mandatory-registration-cancellation-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actual Communication Date Must Be Considered for GST Appeal Limitation: Allahabad HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/actual-communication-date-considered-gst-appeal-limitation-allahabad-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/actual-communication-date-considered-gst-appeal-limitation-allahabad-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056920</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Allahabad HC quashed an appellate order rejecting a GST appeal on limitation, holding the actual communication date must be considered unless rebutted.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/actual-communication-date-considered-gst-appeal-limitation-allahabad-hc.html">Actual Communication Date Must Be Considered for GST Appeal Limitation: Allahabad HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/actual-communication-date-considered-gst-appeal-limitation-allahabad-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 7 IBC Challenge Not Maintainable During Pending NCLT Proceedings: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-7-ibc-challenge-maintainable-pending-nclt-proceedings-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-7-ibc-challenge-maintainable-pending-nclt-proceedings-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC declined to quash pending Section 7 IBC proceedings, holding that objections should be raised before the NCLT.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-7-ibc-challenge-maintainable-pending-nclt-proceedings-karnataka-hc.html">Section 7 IBC Challenge Not Maintainable During Pending NCLT Proceedings: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-7-ibc-challenge-maintainable-pending-nclt-proceedings-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bail Granted in 3 Kg Ganja Recovery Considering Seizure Quantity: Calcutta HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bail-granted-3-kg-ganja-recovery-seizure-quantity-calcutta-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bail-granted-3-kg-ganja-recovery-seizure-quantity-calcutta-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calcutta HC granted bail in a 3 kg ganja recovery case, relying on an SC decision emphasizing the quantity of seizure and prolonged custody.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bail-granted-3-kg-ganja-recovery-seizure-quantity-calcutta-hc.html">Bail Granted in 3 Kg Ganja Recovery Considering Seizure Quantity: Calcutta HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/bail-granted-3-kg-ganja-recovery-seizure-quantity-calcutta-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Refund Directed After Withdrawal of Best Judgment Assessment Order: Patna HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-directed-withdrawal-judgment-assessment-order-patna-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-directed-withdrawal-judgment-assessment-order-patna-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Patna HC directed GST refund if the withdrawn best judgment assessment had led to recovery and the amount had not already been credited.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-directed-withdrawal-judgment-assessment-order-patna-hc.html">GST Refund Directed After Withdrawal of Best Judgment Assessment Order: Patna HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-refund-directed-withdrawal-judgment-assessment-order-patna-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 73 GST Order Challenge Disposed with Liberty to File Delayed Appeal: Telangana HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-gst-order-challenge-disposed-liberty-file-delayed-appeal-telangana-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-gst-order-challenge-disposed-liberty-file-delayed-appeal-telangana-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADV AKRUTI GOYAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Telangana HC permitted a statutory appeal against a Section 73 GST assessment, subject to pre-deposit and consideration of delay condonation by the appellate authority.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-gst-order-challenge-disposed-liberty-file-delayed-appeal-telangana-hc.html">Section 73 GST Order Challenge Disposed with Liberty to File Delayed Appeal: Telangana HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-gst-order-challenge-disposed-liberty-file-delayed-appeal-telangana-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Registration Cancellation Challenge Disposed with Liberty for Statutory Appeal: Telangana HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-challenge-disposed-liberty-statutory-appeal-telangana-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-challenge-disposed-liberty-statutory-appeal-telangana-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADV AKRUTI GOYAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Telangana HC allowed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal within two weeks against GST registration cancellation and directed disposal in accordance with law.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-challenge-disposed-liberty-statutory-appeal-telangana-hc.html">GST Registration Cancellation Challenge Disposed with Liberty for Statutory Appeal: Telangana HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-cancellation-challenge-disposed-liberty-statutory-appeal-telangana-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Registration Revocation Application Permitted After Time-Barred Appeal: Telangana HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-revocation-application-permitted-time-barred-appeal-telangana-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-revocation-application-permitted-time-barred-appeal-telangana-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADV AKRUTI GOYAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Telangana HC permitted filing of a physical application for GST registration revocation after a time-barred appeal and directed its decision within three weeks.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-revocation-application-permitted-time-barred-appeal-telangana-hc.html">GST Registration Revocation Application Permitted After Time-Barred Appeal: Telangana HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-registration-revocation-application-permitted-time-barred-appeal-telangana-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>India’s MLI Problem: Ratified, But Not Notified</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/indias-mli-problem-ratified-notified.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/indias-mli-problem-ratified-notified.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deependra Singh Rawat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 90]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ITAT rulings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/indias-mli-problem-ratified-notified.html">India&#8217;s MLI Problem: Ratified, But Not Notified</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/indias-mli-problem-ratified-notified.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST Rate Changes: Five Compliance Mistakes Businesses Should Avoid</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rate-changes-compliance-mistakes-businesses-avoid.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rate-changes-compliance-mistakes-businesses-avoid.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravichandra Aswale]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Article explains five common compliance mistakes after the 22 September 2025 GST rate changes, covering rates, ITC, transition stock, IMS and GSTR-1A amendments.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rate-changes-compliance-mistakes-businesses-avoid.html">GST Rate Changes: Five Compliance Mistakes Businesses Should Avoid</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-rate-changes-compliance-mistakes-businesses-avoid.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 10(10D): Should Life Insurance Exemption Cover Entire Maturity Proceeds or Only Income?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-1010d-life-insurance-exemption-cover-entire-maturity-proceeds-income.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-1010d-life-insurance-exemption-cover-entire-maturity-proceeds-income.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cavkshetty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Exemption]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057394</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Article examines whether Section 10(10D) exempts the entire life insurance maturity amount or only the income component, referring to CBDT Circular No. 7/2003 and Rule 11UACA.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-1010d-life-insurance-exemption-cover-entire-maturity-proceeds-income.html">Section 10(10D): Should Life Insurance Exemption Cover Entire Maturity Proceeds or Only Income?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-1010d-life-insurance-exemption-cover-entire-maturity-proceeds-income.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips For Reducing Medical Expenses With Your Family</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/finance/tips-reducing-medical-expenses-family.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/finance/tips-reducing-medical-expenses-family.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediclaim]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Reduce family medical expenses with preventive healthcare, smart budgeting, organised medical records and flexible TATA AIG health insurance for better financial security.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/finance/tips-reducing-medical-expenses-family.html">Tips For Reducing Medical Expenses With Your Family</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/finance/tips-reducing-medical-expenses-family.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mutual Fund Taxation: CA Perspective on AMFI’s Budget 2026–27 Proposals</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mutual-fund-taxation-ca-perspective-amfis-budget-2026-27-proposals.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mutual-fund-taxation-ca-perspective-amfis-budget-2026-27-proposals.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shah12.rahul@gmail.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital Gain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Fund]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057410</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AMFI's Budget 2026–27 proposals seek mutual fund tax reforms, compliance simplification, tax neutrality and rationalisation of key Income-tax provisions.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mutual-fund-taxation-ca-perspective-amfis-budget-2026-27-proposals.html">Mutual Fund Taxation: CA Perspective on AMFI’s Budget 2026–27 Proposals</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/mutual-fund-taxation-ca-perspective-amfis-budget-2026-27-proposals.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>₹2500 Monthly Fee per State for Nil GST Returns During CIRP Excessive: NCLT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rs-2500-monthly-fee-state-nil-gst-returns-cirp-excessive-nclt-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rs-2500-monthly-fee-state-nil-gst-returns-cirp-excessive-nclt-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NCLT Kolkata held excessive GST compliance fees for Nil GST returns during CIRP were unreasonable and dismissed the claim for unpaid CIRP costs.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rs-2500-monthly-fee-state-nil-gst-returns-cirp-excessive-nclt-kolkata.html">₹2500 Monthly Fee per State for Nil GST Returns During CIRP Excessive: NCLT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/rs-2500-monthly-fee-state-nil-gst-returns-cirp-excessive-nclt-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 153C Assessments Quashed for Excluded Block Period &amp; Lack of Incriminating Material: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-quashed-excluded-block-period-lack-incriminating-material-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-quashed-excluded-block-period-lack-incriminating-material-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi quashed Section 153C assessments, holding the block period must be reckoned from the satisfaction note date and completed assessments need incriminating material.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-quashed-excluded-block-period-lack-incriminating-material-itat-delhi.html">Section 153C Assessments Quashed for Excluded Block Period &#038; Lack of Incriminating Material: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-quashed-excluded-block-period-lack-incriminating-material-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 153C Assessments Void for Post-April 2021 Satisfaction Note: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-void-post-april-2021-satisfaction-note-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-void-post-april-2021-satisfaction-note-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 149]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi quashed Section 153C assessments as the 20.10.2021 satisfaction note placed the deemed search date after 1 April 2021.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-void-post-april-2021-satisfaction-note-itat-delhi.html">Section 153C Assessments Void for Post-April 2021 Satisfaction Note: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-153c-assessments-void-post-april-2021-satisfaction-note-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 80-IB Deduction Not Reducible Before Computing Section 80HHC Relief: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ib-deduction-reducible-computing-section-80hhc-relief-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ib-deduction-reducible-computing-section-80hhc-relief-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80HHC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras HC remanded Section 80-HHC and Section 80-IB deduction computation to the Assessing Officer in line with the Supreme Court's interpretation of Section 80-IA(9).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ib-deduction-reducible-computing-section-80hhc-relief-madras-hc.html">Section 80-IB Deduction Not Reducible Before Computing Section 80HHC Relief: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-80-ib-deduction-reducible-computing-section-80hhc-relief-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DEPB &amp; Duty Drawback Ineligible Under Section 80-IB, Section 80-IA Issue Remanded: Madras HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/depb-duty-drawback-ineligible-section-80-ib-section-80-ia-issue-remanded-madras-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/depb-duty-drawback-ineligible-section-80-ib-section-80-ia-issue-remanded-madras-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(2)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80HHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80IB]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Madras HC remanded the Section 80-IA and 80-HHC computation issue and held DEPB and duty drawback are not eligible for Section 80-IB deduction.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/depb-duty-drawback-ineligible-section-80-ib-section-80-ia-issue-remanded-madras-hc.html">DEPB &#038; Duty Drawback Ineligible Under Section 80-IB, Section 80-IA Issue Remanded: Madras HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/depb-duty-drawback-ineligible-section-80-ib-section-80-ia-issue-remanded-madras-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 147 Reassessment Annulled as Examined Cash Deposits Involved Change of Opinion: ITAT Lucknow</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-annulled-examined-cash-deposits-involved-change-opinion-itat-lucknow.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-annulled-examined-cash-deposits-involved-change-opinion-itat-lucknow.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Lucknow annulled Section 147 reassessment holding that cash deposits were examined in the original assessment and reopening amounted to a change of opinion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-annulled-examined-cash-deposits-involved-change-opinion-itat-lucknow.html">Section 147 Reassessment Annulled as Examined Cash Deposits Involved Change of Opinion: ITAT Lucknow</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147-reassessment-annulled-examined-cash-deposits-involved-change-opinion-itat-lucknow.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 69A Addition Deleted as Cash Deposits Explained by Withdrawals &amp; Co-owner’s Advance: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-deleted-cash-deposits-explained-withdrawals-co-owners-advance-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-deleted-cash-deposits-explained-withdrawals-co-owners-advance-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi deleted a Section 69A addition after holding that cash deposits were fully explained through verified bank withdrawals and a co-owner’s accepted advance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-deleted-cash-deposits-explained-withdrawals-co-owners-advance-itat-delhi.html">Section 69A Addition Deleted as Cash Deposits Explained by Withdrawals &#038; Co-owner’s Advance: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-deleted-cash-deposits-explained-withdrawals-co-owners-advance-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AO Must Verify Rural Branch Data Before Section 36(1)(viia) Deduction: ITAT Indore</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ao-verify-rural-branch-data-section-361viia-deduction-itat-indore.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ao-verify-rural-branch-data-section-361viia-deduction-itat-indore.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 80P]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056696</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Indore remanded a Section 36(1)(viia) deduction dispute, directing the AO to verify rural branch data before deciding the claim.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ao-verify-rural-branch-data-section-361viia-deduction-itat-indore.html">AO Must Verify Rural Branch Data Before Section 36(1)(viia) Deduction: ITAT Indore</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/ao-verify-rural-branch-data-section-361viia-deduction-itat-indore.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bonafide Education Cess Claim &amp; No Exempt Income Bar Penalty &amp; Section 14A Disallowance: ITAT Pune</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bonafide-education-cess-claim-exempt-income-bar-penalty-section-14a-disallowance-itat-pune.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bonafide-education-cess-claim-exempt-income-bar-penalty-section-14a-disallowance-itat-pune.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 14A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Pune deleted Section 270A penalty on a bonafide Education Cess claim and removed Section 14A disallowance where no exempt income was earned.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bonafide-education-cess-claim-exempt-income-bar-penalty-section-14a-disallowance-itat-pune.html">Bonafide Education Cess Claim &#038; No Exempt Income Bar Penalty &#038; Section 14A Disallowance: ITAT Pune</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/bonafide-education-cess-claim-exempt-income-bar-penalty-section-14a-disallowance-itat-pune.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Speaking GST Registration Cancellation Order Quashed for Lack of Reasons: Guwahati HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-speaking-gst-registration-cancellation-order-quashed-lack-reasons-guwahati-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-speaking-gst-registration-cancellation-order-quashed-lack-reasons-guwahati-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Guwahati HC quashed a GST registration cancellation order, holding that Form GST REG-19 requires reasons and a non-speaking order violates Rule 22.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-speaking-gst-registration-cancellation-order-quashed-lack-reasons-guwahati-hc.html">Non-Speaking GST Registration Cancellation Order Quashed for Lack of Reasons: Guwahati HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-speaking-gst-registration-cancellation-order-quashed-lack-reasons-guwahati-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tehsildar’s Possession Letter Does Not Restart SARFAESI Limitation: DRT Ludhiana</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/tehsildars-possession-letter-restart-sarfaesi-limitation-drt-ludhiana.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/tehsildars-possession-letter-restart-sarfaesi-limitation-drt-ludhiana.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debts recovery tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARFAESI Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>DRT Ludhiana held that limitation under Section 17 SARFAESI runs from the Section 13(4) measure, not a Tehsildar's possession letter, and dismissed the SA as time-barred.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/tehsildars-possession-letter-restart-sarfaesi-limitation-drt-ludhiana.html">Tehsildar’s Possession Letter Does Not Restart SARFAESI Limitation: DRT Ludhiana</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/tehsildars-possession-letter-restart-sarfaesi-limitation-drt-ludhiana.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 69 Addition Cannot Rest Solely on Uncorroborated Loose Sheets: ITAT Hyderabad</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69-addition-rest-solely-uncorroborated-loose-sheets-itat-hyderabad.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69-addition-rest-solely-uncorroborated-loose-sheets-itat-hyderabad.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 132]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Hyderabad deleted a Section 69 addition, holding that unsigned loose sheets seized from a third party, without corroborative evidence, cannot prove unexplained investment.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69-addition-rest-solely-uncorroborated-loose-sheets-itat-hyderabad.html">Section 69 Addition Cannot Rest Solely on Uncorroborated Loose Sheets: ITAT Hyderabad</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69-addition-rest-solely-uncorroborated-loose-sheets-itat-hyderabad.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time-Barred SCN Rendered Service Tax Demand Unsustainable: CESTAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/time-barred-scn-rendered-service-tax-demand-unsustainable-cestat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/time-barred-scn-rendered-service-tax-demand-unsustainable-cestat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Mumbai set aside the service tax demand, holding that the show cause notice was issued beyond limitation, making the proceedings and demand unsustainable.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/time-barred-scn-rendered-service-tax-demand-unsustainable-cestat-mumbai.html">Time-Barred SCN Rendered Service Tax Demand Unsustainable: CESTAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/time-barred-scn-rendered-service-tax-demand-unsustainable-cestat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 73 Ex Parte GST Order Quashed After Wife’s Death &amp; Proprietor’s Illness: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-parte-gst-order-quashed-wifes-death-proprietors-illness-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-parte-gst-order-quashed-wifes-death-proprietors-illness-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC quashed an ex parte Section 73 GST order after accepting the taxpayer’s bona fide reason for non-response and restored proceedings for fresh adjudication.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-parte-gst-order-quashed-wifes-death-proprietors-illness-karnataka-hc.html">Section 73 Ex Parte GST Order Quashed After Wife’s Death &#038; Proprietor’s Illness: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-73-parte-gst-order-quashed-wifes-death-proprietors-illness-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anticipatory Bail Rejected in Fake GST Invoice Case Involving 857 Invoices: Patna HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/anticipatory-bail-rejected-fake-gst-invoice-case-involving-857-invoices-patna-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/anticipatory-bail-rejected-fake-gst-invoice-case-involving-857-invoices-patna-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Patna HC denied anticipatory bail in an alleged fake GST invoice case, citing the nature of accusations and the petitioners criminal antecedents.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/anticipatory-bail-rejected-fake-gst-invoice-case-involving-857-invoices-patna-hc.html">Anticipatory Bail Rejected in Fake GST Invoice Case Involving 857 Invoices: Patna HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/anticipatory-bail-rejected-fake-gst-invoice-case-involving-857-invoices-patna-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 74 GST Demand Deferred for Fresh Hearing on Ignored DRC-01A Reply: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-gst-demand-deferred-fresh-hearing-drc-01a-reply-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-gst-demand-deferred-fresh-hearing-drc-01a-reply-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC deferred Section 74 GST demand, holding the assessee deserved a fresh hearing after its DRC-01A response with invoices and e-way bills was ignored.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-gst-demand-deferred-fresh-hearing-drc-01a-reply-karnataka-hc.html">Section 74 GST Demand Deferred for Fresh Hearing on Ignored DRC-01A Reply: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-74-gst-demand-deferred-fresh-hearing-drc-01a-reply-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recovery of Tainted Money &amp; Credible Complainant Testimony Sustains PC Act Conviction: J&amp;K HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/recovery-tainted-money-credible-complainant-testimony-sustains-pc-act-conviction-jk-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/recovery-tainted-money-credible-complainant-testimony-sustains-pc-act-conviction-jk-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>J&#038;K HC upheld a corruption conviction after finding demand, acceptance and recovery of tainted money proved, holding no failure of justice arose from the sanction objection.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/recovery-tainted-money-credible-complainant-testimony-sustains-pc-act-conviction-jk-hc.html">Recovery of Tainted Money &#038; Credible Complainant Testimony Sustains PC Act Conviction: J&#038;K HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/recovery-tainted-money-credible-complainant-testimony-sustains-pc-act-conviction-jk-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stale SCN Cannot Sustain Section 29(2) GST Registration Cancellation: Gauhati HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/stale-scn-sustain-section-292-gst-registration-cancellation-gauhati-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/stale-scn-sustain-section-292-gst-registration-cancellation-gauhati-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST Registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gauhati HC quashed GST registration cancellation, holding reliance on an 18-month-old show cause notice violated the proviso to Section 29(2).</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/stale-scn-sustain-section-292-gst-registration-cancellation-gauhati-hc.html">Stale SCN Cannot Sustain Section 29(2) GST Registration Cancellation: Gauhati HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/stale-scn-sustain-section-292-gst-registration-cancellation-gauhati-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 69A Addition Remanded After Plea of Mental &amp; Neurological Illness: ITAT Pune</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-remanded-plea-mental-neurological-illness-itat-pune.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-remanded-plea-mental-neurological-illness-itat-pune.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Pune restored the appeal to CIT(A)/NFAC after accepting that the assessee's medical condition prevented appearance, directing fresh adjudication with hearing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-remanded-plea-mental-neurological-illness-itat-pune.html">Section 69A Addition Remanded After Plea of Mental &#038; Neurological Illness: ITAT Pune</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-69a-addition-remanded-plea-mental-neurological-illness-itat-pune.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Limitation &amp; Invalid Section 151 Approval: ITAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-limitation-invalid-section-151-approval-itat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-limitation-invalid-section-151-approval-itat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 09:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Kolkata quashed Section 148 reassessment as time-barred and invalidated reopening for AY 2016-17 due to approval by an incompetent authority under Section 151.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-limitation-invalid-section-151-approval-itat-kolkata.html">Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Limitation &#038; Invalid Section 151 Approval: ITAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-limitation-invalid-section-151-approval-itat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cenvat Credit Recovery Vitiated by Cross-Examination Denial on Third-Party Evidence: CESTAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-recovery-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-third-party-evidence-cestat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-recovery-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-third-party-evidence-cestat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Excise Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cenvat credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056541</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Delhi set aside Cenvat credit recovery, holding third-party statements without cross-examination and corroborative evidence cannot sustain the demand.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-recovery-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-third-party-evidence-cestat-delhi.html">Cenvat Credit Recovery Vitiated by Cross-Examination Denial on Third-Party Evidence: CESTAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/excise-duty/cenvat-credit-recovery-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-third-party-evidence-cestat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS &amp; Ignoring RCM Unsustainable: CESTAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-based-solely-form-26as-ignoring-rcm-unsustainable-cestat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-based-solely-form-26as-ignoring-rcm-unsustainable-cestat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Service Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form 26AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverse Charge Mechanism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056553</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Kolkata set aside service tax demand raised on Form 26AS data, holding RCM applied and unverified CBDT data could not sustain the demand.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-based-solely-form-26as-ignoring-rcm-unsustainable-cestat-kolkata.html">Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS &#038; Ignoring RCM Unsustainable: CESTAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/service-tax/service-tax-demand-based-solely-form-26as-ignoring-rcm-unsustainable-cestat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-Filing of LUT Is a Curable Defect for Export Services: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-filing-lut-curable-defect-export-services-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-filing-lut-curable-defect-export-services-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC quashed a GST demand and appellate order, holding that non-filing of LUT is a curable defect and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-filing-lut-curable-defect-export-services-karnataka-hc.html">Non-Filing of LUT Is a Curable Defect for Export Services: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/non-filing-lut-curable-defect-export-services-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kidney Dialysis Machine Parts Classifiable Under CTH 9018: CESTAT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/kidney-dialysis-machine-parts-classifiable-cth-9018-cestat-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/kidney-dialysis-machine-parts-classifiable-cth-9018-cestat-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Mumbai held that parts used solely with kidney dialysis machines are classifiable under CTH 9018 and taxable at 12% IGST, setting aside the demand.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/kidney-dialysis-machine-parts-classifiable-cth-9018-cestat-mumbai.html">Kidney Dialysis Machine Parts Classifiable Under CTH 9018: CESTAT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/kidney-dialysis-machine-parts-classifiable-cth-9018-cestat-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Certiorari Against Trial Court Decrees Not Maintainable When CPC Remedies Exist: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/certiorari-trial-court-decrees-maintainable-cpc-remedies-exist-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/certiorari-trial-court-decrees-maintainable-cpc-remedies-exist-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC held writ petitions against Trial Court orders not maintainable, directing parties to pursue CPC remedies while granting Section 14 Limitation Act benefit.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/certiorari-trial-court-decrees-maintainable-cpc-remedies-exist-karnataka-hc.html">Certiorari Against Trial Court Decrees Not Maintainable When CPC Remedies Exist: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/certiorari-trial-court-decrees-maintainable-cpc-remedies-exist-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women Accused Exempt from PMLA Section 45(1) Twin Conditions for Bail: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/women-accused-exempt-pmla-section-451-twin-conditions-bail-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/women-accused-exempt-pmla-section-451-twin-conditions-bail-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prevention of Money Laundering Act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC refused to cancel bail, holding that the Section 45(1) PMLA proviso exempts women from the twin conditions, subject to judicial discretion.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/women-accused-exempt-pmla-section-451-twin-conditions-bail-karnataka-hc.html">Women Accused Exempt from PMLA Section 45(1) Twin Conditions for Bail: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/women-accused-exempt-pmla-section-451-twin-conditions-bail-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fuel Expense Disallowance Restricted to 5% Due to Self-Made Voucher Difficulties: ITAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fuel-expense-disallowance-restricted-5-percent-due-self-made-voucher-difficulties-itat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fuel-expense-disallowance-restricted-5-percent-due-self-made-voucher-difficulties-itat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 37]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Kolkata restricted oil and fuel expense disallowance to 5%, holding that full disallowance would result in an unrealistic net profit in the transportation business.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fuel-expense-disallowance-restricted-5-percent-due-self-made-voucher-difficulties-itat-kolkata.html">Fuel Expense Disallowance Restricted to 5% Due to Self-Made Voucher Difficulties: ITAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/fuel-expense-disallowance-restricted-5-percent-due-self-made-voucher-difficulties-itat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reassessment Vitiated by Cross-Examination Denial &amp; Section 147 Use Instead of 153C: ITAT Surat</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-section-147-section-153c-itat-surat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-section-147-section-153c-itat-surat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 153C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Surat quashed reassessment, holding denial of cross-examination and initiation under Section 147 instead of Section 153C rendered the proceedings invalid.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-section-147-section-153c-itat-surat.html">Reassessment Vitiated by Cross-Examination Denial &#038; Section 147 Use Instead of 153C: ITAT Surat</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/reassessment-vitiated-cross-examination-denial-section-147-section-153c-itat-surat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeal E-Filed at 9 PM Within Section 61 IBC Limitation Valid: NCLAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/appeal-e-filed-9-pm-section-61-ibc-limitation-valid-nclat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/appeal-e-filed-9-pm-section-61-ibc-limitation-valid-nclat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NCLAT Delhi held an appeal e-filed at 9 PM on the 45th day remained within the condonable period under Section 61 IBC, with limitation computed from the date of e-filing.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/appeal-e-filed-9-pm-section-61-ibc-limitation-valid-nclat-delhi.html">Appeal E-Filed at 9 PM Within Section 61 IBC Limitation Valid: NCLAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/appeal-e-filed-9-pm-section-61-ibc-limitation-valid-nclat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 52 Security Interest Realisation Denied for Regulation 21A Non-Compliance: NCLT Mumbai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-52-security-interest-realisation-denied-regulation-21a-non-compliance-nclt-mumbai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-52-security-interest-realisation-denied-regulation-21a-non-compliance-nclt-mumbai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NCLT Mumbai held that failure to comply with Regulation 21A timelines barred a secured creditor from exercising Section 52 rights, making the secured assets part of the liquidation estate.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-52-security-interest-realisation-denied-regulation-21a-non-compliance-nclt-mumbai.html">Section 52 Security Interest Realisation Denied for Regulation 21A Non-Compliance: NCLT Mumbai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-52-security-interest-realisation-denied-regulation-21a-non-compliance-nclt-mumbai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 147A Amendment Requires Fresh Consideration of Reassessment Challenge: Karnataka HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147a-amendment-requires-fresh-consideration-reassessment-challenge-karnataka-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147a-amendment-requires-fresh-consideration-reassessment-challenge-karnataka-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reassessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056563</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Karnataka HC set aside the order quashing reassessment notices and remanded the matter, permitting challenge to Section 147A in line with the SC ruling.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147a-amendment-requires-fresh-consideration-reassessment-challenge-karnataka-hc.html">Section 147A Amendment Requires Fresh Consideration of Reassessment Challenge: Karnataka HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-147a-amendment-requires-fresh-consideration-reassessment-challenge-karnataka-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>₹5.06 Lakh Recovery Suit Dismissed as Handwriting Admission Failed to Prove Dues: Gujarat HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rs-5-06-lakh-recovery-suit-dismissed-handwriting-admission-failed-prove-dues-gujarat-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rs-5-06-lakh-recovery-suit-dismissed-handwriting-admission-failed-prove-dues-gujarat-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Gujarat HC dismissed a money recovery appeal, holding that unsupported claims and an unproved photocopy could not discharge the burden under Sections 101 and 102.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rs-5-06-lakh-recovery-suit-dismissed-handwriting-admission-failed-prove-dues-gujarat-hc.html">₹5.06 Lakh Recovery Suit Dismissed as Handwriting Admission Failed to Prove Dues: Gujarat HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/rs-5-06-lakh-recovery-suit-dismissed-handwriting-admission-failed-prove-dues-gujarat-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 98 IBC RP Replacement Rejected for Lack of Bias or Misconduct: NCLT Jaipur</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-98-ibc-rp-replacement-rejected-lack-bias-misconduct-nclt-jaipur.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-98-ibc-rp-replacement-rejected-lack-bias-misconduct-nclt-jaipur.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NCLT Jaipur held a Personal Guarantor may seek RP replacement under Section 98 IBC even after admission, but dismissed the plea for lack of evidence of bias or misconduct.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-98-ibc-rp-replacement-rejected-lack-bias-misconduct-nclt-jaipur.html">Section 98 IBC RP Replacement Rejected for Lack of Bias or Misconduct: NCLT Jaipur</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/section-98-ibc-rp-replacement-rejected-lack-bias-misconduct-nclt-jaipur.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rectification of Rule 28 Defects Alone Cannot Defeat Section 9 Remedy: NCLAT Chennai</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/rectification-rule-28-defects-defeat-section-9-remedy-nclat-chennai.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/rectification-rule-28-defects-defeat-section-9-remedy-nclat-chennai.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCLAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NCLAT held that procedural non-rectification of defects under Rule 28(4) should not deprive an Operational Creditor of adjudication on merits, while retaining costs and imposing strict timelines for compliance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/rectification-rule-28-defects-defeat-section-9-remedy-nclat-chennai.html">Rectification of Rule 28 Defects Alone Cannot Defeat Section 9 Remedy: NCLAT Chennai</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/rectification-rule-28-defects-defeat-section-9-remedy-nclat-chennai.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-Trial Plaint Amendment for Possession Relief Upheld Despite 4-Year Delay: J&amp;K HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pre-trial-plaint-amendment-possession-relief-upheld-4-year-delay-jk-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pre-trial-plaint-amendment-possession-relief-upheld-4-year-delay-jk-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Jammu &#038; Kashmir HC upheld a pre-trial amendment adding possession relief, holding Order II Rule 2 CPC did not bar amendment and delay alone was insufficient.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pre-trial-plaint-amendment-possession-relief-upheld-4-year-delay-jk-hc.html">Pre-Trial Plaint Amendment for Possession Relief Upheld Despite 4-Year Delay: J&#038;K HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/pre-trial-plaint-amendment-possession-relief-upheld-4-year-delay-jk-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre-Existing Civil Suit Not Barred by Subsequent Section 95 IBC Proceedings: Calcutta HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/pre-existing-civil-suit-barred-subsequent-section-95-ibc-proceedings-calcutta-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/pre-existing-civil-suit-barred-subsequent-section-95-ibc-proceedings-calcutta-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC 2016]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calcutta HC held that Section 96 IBC does not bar or require dismissal of a civil suit filed before Section 95 proceedings and remanded the suit for trial.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/pre-existing-civil-suit-barred-subsequent-section-95-ibc-proceedings-calcutta-hc.html">Pre-Existing Civil Suit Not Barred by Subsequent Section 95 IBC Proceedings: Calcutta HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/pre-existing-civil-suit-barred-subsequent-section-95-ibc-proceedings-calcutta-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Routine Support Services Not Royalty Under DTAA; Taxable as Business Profits Without PE: ITAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/routine-support-services-royalty-dtaa-taxable-business-profits-pe-itat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/routine-support-services-royalty-dtaa-taxable-business-profits-pe-itat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 234F]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Delhi held routine support and HR services are not royalty under the India-Philippines and India-Thailand DTAAs. Without a PE, Article 7 bars taxation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/routine-support-services-royalty-dtaa-taxable-business-profits-pe-itat-delhi.html">Routine Support Services Not Royalty Under DTAA; Taxable as Business Profits Without PE: ITAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/routine-support-services-royalty-dtaa-taxable-business-profits-pe-itat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 271AAC(1) Penalty Cannot Survive After Section 69A Addition Deletion: ITAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-271aac1-penalty-survive-section-69a-addition-deletion-itat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-271aac1-penalty-survive-section-69a-addition-deletion-itat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 250]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 264]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271AAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056531</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT held penalty under Section 271AAC(1) is unsustainable after deletion of Section 69A addition under Section 264 and set aside the penalty order.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-271aac1-penalty-survive-section-69a-addition-deletion-itat-kolkata.html">Section 271AAC(1) Penalty Cannot Survive After Section 69A Addition Deletion: ITAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-271aac1-penalty-survive-section-69a-addition-deletion-itat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 68 Addition on Stampede Capital Share Sale Deleted for Lack of Assessee Link: ITAT Kolkata</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-stampede-capital-share-sale-deleted-lack-assessee-link-itat-kolkata.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-stampede-capital-share-sale-deleted-lack-assessee-link-itat-kolkata.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 143(3)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 68]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056538</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Kolkata upheld deletion of Section 68 addition, holding share sale proceeds could not be treated as unexplained without evidence linking the assessee.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-stampede-capital-share-sale-deleted-lack-assessee-link-itat-kolkata.html">Section 68 Addition on Stampede Capital Share Sale Deleted for Lack of Assessee Link: ITAT Kolkata</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-68-addition-stampede-capital-share-sale-deleted-lack-assessee-link-itat-kolkata.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Department Cannot Reclassify Mobile Phone Parts Without Proving Rule 2(a) GIR Applies: CESTAT Delhi</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/department-reclassify-mobile-phone-parts-proving-rule-2a-gir-applies-cestat-delhi.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/department-reclassify-mobile-phone-parts-proving-rule-2a-gir-applies-cestat-delhi.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cestat judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1056536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>CESTAT Delhi set aside reclassification of imported mobile phone parts after holding the department failed to prove Rule 2(a) GIR applied or that the goods had essential character.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/department-reclassify-mobile-phone-parts-proving-rule-2a-gir-applies-cestat-delhi.html">Department Cannot Reclassify Mobile Phone Parts Without Proving Rule 2(a) GIR Applies: CESTAT Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/custom-duty/department-reclassify-mobile-phone-parts-proving-rule-2a-gir-applies-cestat-delhi.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT/ITES Services Not Job or Labour Work; Set-Off Allowed: MVAT Tribunal</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/it-ites-services-job-labour-work-set-off-allowed-mvat-tribunal.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/it-ites-services-job-labour-work-set-off-allowed-mvat-tribunal.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UBR Legal Advocates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVAT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal held Rule 54(d) inapplicable to IT/ITES services, set aside refund denial and turnover addition, and remanded for limited verification.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/it-ites-services-job-labour-work-set-off-allowed-mvat-tribunal.html">IT/ITES Services Not Job or Labour Work; Set-Off Allowed: MVAT Tribunal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/it-ites-services-job-labour-work-set-off-allowed-mvat-tribunal.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICEGATE Contact Details Update After GST Amendment &amp; GSTIN Integration</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/icegate-contact-details-update-gst-amendment-gstin-integration.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/icegate-contact-details-update-gst-amendment-gstin-integration.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KARAN MOTWANI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICEGATE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057336</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains the steps to update ICEGATE email or mobile by first amending GST registration, integrating GSTIN with Customs, and updating the ICEGATE profile.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/icegate-contact-details-update-gst-amendment-gstin-integration.html">ICEGATE Contact Details Update After GST Amendment &#038; GSTIN Integration</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/icegate-contact-details-update-gst-amendment-gstin-integration.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mining Lease Extended by 5 Years 10 Months After Invalid Suspension Order: Orissa HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/mining-lease-extended-5-years-10-months-invalid-suspension-order-orissa-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/mining-lease-extended-5-years-10-months-invalid-suspension-order-orissa-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Orissa HC granted a compensatory 5 years 10 months mining lease period after holding the suspension order invalid for lack of hearing and valid clearance.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/mining-lease-extended-5-years-10-months-invalid-suspension-order-orissa-hc.html">Mining Lease Extended by 5 Years 10 Months After Invalid Suspension Order: Orissa HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/mining-lease-extended-5-years-10-months-invalid-suspension-order-orissa-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gift Deed Cancellation Upheld as Son Failed to Maintain Parents: Bombay HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gift-deed-cancellation-upheld-son-failed-maintain-parents-bombay-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gift-deed-cancellation-upheld-son-failed-maintain-parents-bombay-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Sandeep Kanoi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Bombay HC upheld cancellation of a gift deed under Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act after finding the son failed to fulfil the obligation to care for his parents.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gift-deed-cancellation-upheld-son-failed-maintain-parents-bombay-hc.html">Gift Deed Cancellation Upheld as Son Failed to Maintain Parents: Bombay HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/corporate-law/gift-deed-cancellation-upheld-son-failed-maintain-parents-bombay-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Section 148A Breach; Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted: Ahmedabad ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-section-148a-breach-bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-ahmedabad-itat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-section-148a-breach-bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-ahmedabad-itat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogus purchases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 147]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 37(1)]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Ahmedabad quashed Section 148 reassessment for non-compliance with Section 148A and deleted bogus purchase additions based on documentary evidence.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-section-148a-breach-bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-ahmedabad-itat.html">Section 148 Reassessment Quashed for Section 148A Breach; Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted: Ahmedabad ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-148-reassessment-quashed-section-148a-breach-bogus-purchase-addition-deleted-ahmedabad-itat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 54F Exemption Allowed as Section 50C Deeming Fiction Inapplicable: Chennai ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54f-exemption-allowed-section-50c-deeming-fiction-inapplicable-chennai-itat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54f-exemption-allowed-section-50c-deeming-fiction-inapplicable-chennai-itat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 48]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 50C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 54]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 54F]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Chennai held Section 50C cannot determine Section 54F net consideration and allowed full exemption where the entire actual sale consideration was invested.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54f-exemption-allowed-section-50c-deeming-fiction-inapplicable-chennai-itat.html">Section 54F Exemption Allowed as Section 50C Deeming Fiction Inapplicable: Chennai ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-54f-exemption-allowed-section-50c-deeming-fiction-inapplicable-chennai-itat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Section 263 Revision Quashed as AO Took Plausible View After Enquiry: Chandigarh ITAT</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-revision-quashed-ao-plausible-view-enquiry-chandigarh-itat.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-revision-quashed-ao-plausible-view-enquiry-chandigarh-itat.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA AJAY KUMAR AGRAWAL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAT Judgments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 144]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 148]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 263]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 270A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271AAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 271AAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 69C]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ITAT Chandigarh quashed Section 263 revision, holding that a plausible assessment view after detailed enquiry cannot be replaced by the Principal Commissioner.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-revision-quashed-ao-plausible-view-enquiry-chandigarh-itat.html">Section 263 Revision Quashed as AO Took Plausible View After Enquiry: Chandigarh ITAT</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/section-263-revision-quashed-ao-plausible-view-enquiry-chandigarh-itat.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senior Management Personnel: Regulatory Journey from Appointment to Exit</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/company-law/senior-management-personnel-regulatory-journey-appointment-exit.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/company-law/senior-management-personnel-regulatory-journey-appointment-exit.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jyoti Sah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Company Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies Act 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LODR Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains the SEBI LODR framework for Senior Management Personnel, covering appointment, disclosures, governance obligations, PIT compliance and exit requirements.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/company-law/senior-management-personnel-regulatory-journey-appointment-exit.html">Senior Management Personnel: Regulatory Journey from Appointment to Exit</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/company-law/senior-management-personnel-regulatory-journey-appointment-exit.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GST on Online Businesses in India: Registration, TCS, Section 9(5) &amp; OIDAR</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-online-businesses-india-registration-tcs-section-95-oidar.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-online-businesses-india-registration-tcs-section-95-oidar.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA. Keshav Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OIDAR Services]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Explains GST registration, TCS under Section 52, Section 9(5), OIDAR provisions and compliance obligations for different online business models.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-online-businesses-india-registration-tcs-section-95-oidar.html">GST on Online Businesses in India: Registration, TCS, Section 9(5) &#038; OIDAR</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/gst-online-businesses-india-registration-tcs-section-95-oidar.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professor Earning from Guest Lectures? Your Tax Treatment May Be Wrong</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/professor-earning-guest-lectures-tax-treatment-wrong.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/professor-earning-guest-lectures-tax-treatment-wrong.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CA Vineet Rawat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 194J]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 44AD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Guest lecture and teaching income is generally taxed on actual income, with Sections 44AD and 44ADA stated as inapplicable to such activities.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/professor-earning-guest-lectures-tax-treatment-wrong.html">Professor Earning from Guest Lectures? Your Tax Treatment May Be Wrong</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/professor-earning-guest-lectures-tax-treatment-wrong.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Only NRO Interest Income with TDS Deducted: Is ITR Filing Still Required?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nro-interest-income-tds-deducted-itr-filing-required.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nro-interest-income-tds-deducted-itr-filing-required.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonia Dawar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECTION 87A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>NRIs must file ITR if Indian income exceeds Rs. 4 lakh or to claim excess TDS refunds, with Section 87A rebate unavailable to non-residents.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nro-interest-income-tds-deducted-itr-filing-required.html">Only NRO Interest Income with TDS Deducted: Is ITR Filing Still Required?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/nro-interest-income-tds-deducted-itr-filing-required.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crypto Gains and Losses: Can You Set Off One Against the Other?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/crypto-gains-losses-set-off-other.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/crypto-gains-losses-set-off-other.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonia Dawar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cryptocurrency - Bitcoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax act 1961]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax Act 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BBH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 194S]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Digital Assets]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Section 115BBH taxes VDA gains at 30%, disallows loss set-off, and Section 194S requires 1% TDS on eligible crypto transfers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/crypto-gains-losses-set-off-other.html">Crypto Gains and Losses: Can You Set Off One Against the Other?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/crypto-gains-losses-set-off-other.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debt Fund Held for Three Years: Why Is It Still Taxed at Slab Rate?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debt-fund-held-years-taxed-slab-rate.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debt-fund-held-years-taxed-slab-rate.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonia Dawar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2024]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mutual Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 115BAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 50AA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECTION 87A]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Section 50AA taxes specified debt mutual fund units acquired on or after 1 April 2023 at slab rates, regardless of holding period, without indexation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debt-fund-held-years-taxed-slab-rate.html">Debt Fund Held for Three Years: Why Is It Still Taxed at Slab Rate?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/debt-fund-held-years-taxed-slab-rate.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Returning to India After 9 Years: How Long Is Foreign Income Tax-Free?</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/returning-india-9-years-long-foreign-income-tax-free.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/returning-india-9-years-long-foreign-income-tax-free.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonia Dawar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Planning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>RNOR under Sections 6 and 6(6) can keep eligible foreign income outside Indian tax during the transition period after an NRI returns to India.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/returning-india-9-years-long-foreign-income-tax-free.html">Returning to India After 9 Years: How Long Is Foreign Income Tax-Free?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/returning-india-9-years-long-foreign-income-tax-free.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title> Section 107(11) Remand Order Set Aside as GST Appellate Authority Lacked Power to Remand: Calcutta HC</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-10711-remand-order-set-gst-appellate-authority-lacked-power-remand-calcutta-hc.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-10711-remand-order-set-gst-appellate-authority-lacked-power-remand-calcutta-hc.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dhiraj lakhotia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Goods and Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goods And Services Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court judgments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057270</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Calcutta HC set aside a GST remand order, holding Section 107(11) bars the Appellate Authority from remanding matters to the Adjudicating Authority.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-10711-remand-order-set-gst-appellate-authority-lacked-power-remand-calcutta-hc.html"> Section 107(11) Remand Order Set Aside as GST Appellate Authority Lacked Power to Remand: Calcutta HC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/goods-and-service-tax/section-10711-remand-order-set-gst-appellate-authority-lacked-power-remand-calcutta-hc.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICAI Issues Exposure Draft on Revised Section 44AB Tax Audit Guidance Note</title>
		<link>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/icai-issues-exposure-draft-revised-section-44ab-tax-audit-guidance-note.html</link>
					<comments>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/icai-issues-exposure-draft-revised-section-44ab-tax-audit-guidance-note.html#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chartered accountants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section 44AB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Audit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://taxguru.in/?p=1057291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>ICAI has invited public comments on the Exposure Draft revising the Guidance Note on Tax Audit under Section 44AB by 25th July, 2025.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://taxguru.in/income-tax/icai-issues-exposure-draft-revised-section-44ab-tax-audit-guidance-note.html">ICAI Issues Exposure Draft on Revised Section 44AB Tax Audit Guidance Note</a> appeared first on <a href="https://taxguru.in">TaxGuru</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://taxguru.in/income-tax/icai-issues-exposure-draft-revised-section-44ab-tax-audit-guidance-note.html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>