<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Technology is Dead - Thoughts on Enterprise Infrastructure</title>
	
	<link>http://www.technologyisdead.com</link>
	<description>Global IT infrastructure, cloud computing, and emerging technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechnologyIsDead" /><feedburner:info uri="technologyisdead" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>The Great AIX vs. Solaris Debate</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/PxRMEyKzHlQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/09/02/the-great-aix-vs-solaris-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 05:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aix versus solaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/PxRMEyKzHlQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/09/02/the-great-aix-vs-solaris-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/09/02/the-great-aix-vs-solaris-debate/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Relo Redux</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/4VWDuol3D-k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/26/anatomy-of-global-relo-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global relocation australia united states]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/26/anatomy-of-global-relo-redux/</guid>
		<description>Last fall I liked to say&amp;#8230;.a global move is technically just like a cross country move, only you fly to get there and it costs a lot more money. 
Here&amp;#8217;s the skinny with 20-20 hindsight:
Planning &amp;#8211; you can plan to death, but it doesn&amp;#8217;t change the workload 
Things &amp;#8211; you can throw away things you [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/4VWDuol3D-k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/26/anatomy-of-global-relo-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/26/anatomy-of-global-relo-redux/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Centre GreenTech – Sydney</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/3-6JCMrGrNY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/12/data-centre-greentech-sydney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=352</guid>
		<description>It's good to be involved in a surprisingly fresh movement around data centre efficiency. The overall attitude is constructive and people are trying out new ideas. Reminds me of why I didn't take the job on a rig in the Gulf of Mexico back in 1996.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/3-6JCMrGrNY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/12/data-centre-greentech-sydney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/12/data-centre-greentech-sydney/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>IT Partnerships</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/Y6s8dSipLk0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/09/it-partnerships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 07:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it partnerships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description>A visual post about IT partnerships, productivity vs. time wasting, and healthy vs. unhealthy alliances.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/Y6s8dSipLk0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/09/it-partnerships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/08/09/it-partnerships/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Regional Start-Up</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/kJyBD7913DA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/07/22/the-regional-start-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=324</guid>
		<description>About a month after beginning ‘aka the honeymoon period’, I realised starting a regional extension to the company was going to be less like a regular role and more like running a startup business.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/kJyBD7913DA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/07/22/the-regional-start-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/07/22/the-regional-start-up/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Data Centres of Antiquity</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/gbLMjEnwY7k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/06/05/data-centres-of-antiquity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=301</guid>
		<description>According to Connection Research, only 3.5% of CIO’s have responsibility and budget for the data centre power bill, 66% have NO visibility or responsibility, and the remainder have some visibility and some accountability (which isn’t saying much since this is a self-assessment scoring, usually biasing results to the favor of the assessed!).&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/gbLMjEnwY7k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/06/05/data-centres-of-antiquity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/06/05/data-centres-of-antiquity/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sydney vs. Melbourne, a Tale of 2 Cities in the South Pacific</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/3CU--Do_tNs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/02/20/sydney-vs-melbourne-a-tale-of-2-cities-in-the-south-pacific/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=278</guid>
		<description>At first, it’s subtle commentary from people on both sides. Nonchalant jabs to the groin, “I detest Melbourne”, “I’d never live in Sydney”. While I really don’t care, it’s amazing when you see both cities are brilliant in comparison to let’s say, MOST port cities in the rest of the world.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/3CU--Do_tNs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/02/20/sydney-vs-melbourne-a-tale-of-2-cities-in-the-south-pacific/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/02/20/sydney-vs-melbourne-a-tale-of-2-cities-in-the-south-pacific/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MindMapping for People Networks</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/XvMknUFh3WM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/02/15/mindmapping-for-people-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=264</guid>
		<description>...one of the questions I tabled to all the top business developers I could meet was 'what do you use to manage your business contacts and networks'?

The responses varied from whiteboards, to weekly planners, to moleskins, to prodigious use of www.linkedin.com, all with their strengths and limits for keeping track of a rapidly expanding network of contacts and relationships.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/XvMknUFh3WM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/02/15/mindmapping-for-people-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/02/15/mindmapping-for-people-networks/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cats vs. Container</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/QjYLvMGX6Ho/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/01/25/cats-vs-container/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description>One of the  shocking realizations of a global move is the cost of moving your animals, versus the cost of moving your belongings. In our case, we fit our &amp;#8217;stuff&amp;#8217; sans cars into a 20&amp;#8242; shipping container.
The container contents wrapped, packed like an intricate puzzle, either scanned or unpacked by customs, then finally unloaded and [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/QjYLvMGX6Ho" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/01/25/cats-vs-container/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/01/25/cats-vs-container/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>So Long Boston, Hello Sydney</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~3/Kfy4qQSHIbg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/01/10/so-long-boston-hello-sydney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technologyisdead.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description>Boston is funny. When we first got here in 2002 the immediate reaction was 'crap, we just made a huge mistake'. It was cold, you had little old ladies driving Buicks and flipping you off with road rage, driving anywhere was insane, and the environs were 'crusty' in comparison to the old home Seattle, and the only view was of 'Uncle Buck' across the street.  But with time we settled in and looking back, now our lives revolve merrily around city parks, coffee shops, and some great places to eat.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TechnologyIsDead/~4/Kfy4qQSHIbg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/01/10/so-long-boston-hello-sydney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.technologyisdead.com/2010/01/10/so-long-boston-hello-sydney/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
