• The new Tesla Roadster has been nine years in the making
• Some customers placed reservations for the vehicle back in 2017
• Rumors suggest the EV could use gas thrusters to aid acceleration

After years of delays and multiple shuffled goalposts, it looks like the next-generation Tesla Roadster will finally make its first public outing.

The official Tesla website posted a teaser image over the weekend that shows what appears to be a taillight, a large spoiler or rear diffuser and some sort of quad-thruster deployment spraying gas into the atmosphere.

There’s also a countdown clock, with the official Tesla account on X stating “Go for launch,” accompanied by the date 10.01, or October 1.

It is all typically cryptic, but some news outlets have flipped the image and said it looks more like an enormous rear spoiler with a light at the rear and thrusters beneath that, which would tally with Elon Musk’s claims that the sports car could use SpaceX-developed cold-gas thrusters as performance-enhancers.

Not a Tesla App is reporting that some key Tesla people, including online influencers, have started receiving their digital invitations, which suggest it will be held in Waco, Texas. Tesla has since confirmed the Waco location.

The Roadster is a hugely influential nameplate. After all, the all-electric model that was heavily based on a Lotus Elise was arguably the car — and proof of concept — that kick-started the journey for the EV company.

As a result, Tesla fans and investors rushed to place deposits on the next generation when the project was first announced back in November 2017.

Back then, it was said that it would offer 620 miles of range, a sub-two-second 0-60 mph sprint time and a 250-mph top speed, according to Electrek. Tesla still lists those figures on its Roadster website today.

Alas, a release date for the "quickest car in the world" has been pushed back multiple times, with some early investors suggesting that they had backed out of the purchase because it was taking too long, including influential YouTuber Marques Brownlee — also known as MKBHD.

In order to keep excitement levels high over the years, company founder and CEO Elon Musk has dropped several tidbits, including the fact that the Roadster could use cold-gas thrusters developed by SpaceX to achieve massive levels of straight-line performance.

It was even hinted that the vehicle would be able to hover or fly, with Musk telling podcast host Joe Rogan that his friend and entrepreneur Peter Thiel wanted flying cars and that his vision should be realized.

This was also backed up by a post on X, where Elon Musk responded to a poster by saying, “You will get flying cars” in 2026.

Analysis: The crown prince of pantomime

Like the “We, Robot” event that Tesla hosted in 2024 for the launch of the company’s Cybercab concept, we can expect a healthy dose of theatrics when the Roadster finally makes its public debut.

At Warner Bros. Studios in California, a select number of Cybercabs gave their first public “rides” around a purpose-built film set, while Tesla’s Optimus robots made drinks and interacted with the crowds that attended.

But scratch the surface and reports suggested that those Optimus robots were, in fact, tele-operated by human beings behind the scenes.

It has also been reported that the environment in which the Cybercabs operated was carefully controlled and previously mapped to reduce any hiccups at the event.

Whatever the Roadster demonstrates next month, you can bet your bottom dollar that it won’t be street legal if it does involve cold-gas thrusters, leaving many fans waiting to see if the general public will ever be able to purchase a Tesla sports car again.

And herein lies the problem: Tesla hasn’t hosted a reveal event for anything that has developed into a meaningful passenger vehicle for years.

The Cybertruck has proven itself to be a monumental sales flop, and the company now only offers two models in its core passenger car lineup.

As great as the Model 3 and Model Y are, there’s just so much competition out there now that delivers more — more range, more practicality, more technology.

Rather than dropping the silk sheet on a flying sports car next month, the general public would likely get more excited about an all-new model they can actually buy, be it the long-rumored $25,000 hatchback or genuine replacements for the Model S and Model X.

But hey, that's not the Tesla way.

• A new Mac music player called YM Pro has been released on the Mac App Store and promises 'bit perfect' playback
• It bypasses macOS' system mixer to connect directly to your DAC
• Changes the DAC to match the file, not the other way around
• PCM audio only, requires Apple Silicon

If you're looking for a hi-res music player for your Mac that can make the most of your external audio equipment, YM Pro could be just what you're looking for.

It's free, open source, available on the Mac App Store, and offers an interesting alternative to Apple's way of doing things, especially if you use an external DAC. And while it's very much a work in progress it's got lots of potential.

Developer Yonesh Murugan has posted details of the app to r/audiophile. Getting it approved was apparently a "nightmare" because the app takes exclusive control of your audio hardware, something App Store reviewers weren't too happy about. But it's now approved and live, although there are a few rough edges still.

The key difference between YM Pro and other apps is that it bypasses the system mixer completely, connecting directly to your DAC and automatically switching its sample rate to the file you're playing, up to 192kHz.

It also has "hog mode", which turns off all your system sounds and other audio while you're listening.

YM Pro audio player: what works, and what needs work

The "bit-perfect" claim is about how the app handles music playback. Rather than up- or downsampling audio files to match your DAC's set bitrate, it adjusts your DAC to match the audio file's resolution — and does it directly, without any other software resampling as it passes through the OS, so your audio should remain pure.

Although YM Pro's core mission is to play hi-res, bit-perfect FLAC files, which the Apple Music app doesn't do (Apple wants you to use its ALAC equivalent instead), it also handles common formats including MP3 and WAV.

It's purely for PCM formats, not DSD, and it requires Apple Silicon (as does macOS 27, which launches imminently).

The app doesn't connect to your Music library; instead, you point it to the folder containing the music you want it to catalog and play. That folder can be the one containing your existing Music library, but it lacks auto-scanning and auto-updating so you'd need to keep it up to date manually.

This is a first release, so inevitably there are some issues. And I seem to be encountering more than most: I can't persuade it to use my preferred audio output, no matter how many times I change it in System Settings > Sound; the workaround described in the r/audiophile thread isn't working on my Mac Mini, where the app isn't paying attention to my selection. There are some interface issues, and others report some playlist organization issues too.

However, early feedback from others says the app sounds good, and as it's free, it's worth taking a look at or listen to so you can compare it with the likes of VOX.

Murugan seems keen on feedback from users, and is promising to make some enhancements based on the comments provided so far.

• Researchers warn Skullcandy Dime 3 earbuds on older firmware accept Bluetooth pairing from unknown devices with no user interaction required
• When leveraged, it can be used to interrupt the owner's connections, hijack playback, and even capture live microphone audio
• The vulnerability has been patched in a newer firmware update available only on newer units, does not seem to be addressable for existing earbuds

Carnegie Mellon University's CERT Coordination Center has warned Skullcandy's Dime 3 wireless earbuds will accept a Bluetooth pairing request from a stranger's device without the owner doing anything.

The resulting bond is permanent, and the only sign the owner gets is a spoken "new device paired" notification delivered after it has already happened, with zero user interaction to confirm the request.

The advisory covering the Dime 3 was written by CERT/CC's Bob Kemerer and credits independent researcher Jacob Nowak, who had posted his findings to the Full Disclosure mailing list in early August after testing it on hardware he owned.

A fix deployed that covers virtually no existing users

What makes this worse is that, ironically, while Skullcandy was swift in addressing the issue affecting earbuds running firmware version 1.0.0.28 by rolling out a patched version 1.0.0.30, it seems to address the issue only in newly made units.

CERT notes that there seem to be no "consumer-accessible" methods to upgrade existing units to the newest firmware because it reportedly has no support via the companion app, as a Tom's Guide review indicates.

A product without an update path that is user-accessible essentially means that its software flaws, or in this case, security issues, are here to stay for users who have had the bad luck of buying an earlier unit.

The underlying vulnerability, CVE-2025-20701, is not new and is not of Skullcandy's making. It is one of three vulnerabilities that Dennis Heinze and Frieder Steinmetz of the German firm ERNW disclosed in June 2025 at the TROOPERS conference in Heidelberg, affecting Bluetooth systems-on-chip from Taiwan's Airoha.

The Dime 3's Bluetooth identifier names Airoha as its chipset vendor, and while Airoha shipped a fixed SDK to its customers in June 2025 and published its bulletin that August, owners of the earbuds are in a unique situation, to say the least.

The vulnerability's severity is disputed: MediaTek (which owns Airoha) assigned it a relatively low 6.7 rating, while CISA's vulnerability enrichment program later assigned it an 8.8 with a 'high' categorization.

A potential attacker is limited to what the earbuds can access, since the vulnerability is essentially limited to the earbuds, but one could still wreak havoc with that alone. It should allow for more than just disrupting a person's routine by 'hijacking' one's earbuds by essentially using their microphones on them to record conversations or, in an extreme theoretical case (requiring chaining with other exploits), impersonate the headset and pull contacts, call history, and even pass hands-free commands to a paired smartphone. The latter, however, would require a high technical skill set, being within a few meters of a victim, and a Bluetooth connection turned on on the paired smartphone.

For now, a vulnerability exists that Skullcandy should have been able to patch, exactly as Apple recently did for its Beats Studio Buds, but a lack of support for any third party apps on the budget earbuds is somewhat annoyingly resulting in an unpatchable vulnerability for existing users.

Quordle was one of the original Wordle alternatives and is still going strong now more than 1,500 games later. It offers a genuine challenge, though, so read on if you need some Quordle hints today — or scroll down further for the answers.

Enjoy playing word games? You can also check out my NYT Connections today and NYT Strands today pages for hints and answers for those puzzles, while Marc's Wordle today column covers the original viral word game.

SPOILER WARNING: Information about Quordle today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.

Quordle today (game #1695) — hint #1 — Vowels

* Note that by vowel we mean the five standard vowels (A, E, I, O, U), not Y (which is sometimes counted as a vowel too).

Quordle today (game #1695) — hint #2 — repeated letters

Quordle today (game #1695) — hint #3 — uncommon letters

Quordle today (game #1695) — hint #4 — starting letters (1)

If you just want to know the answers at this stage, simply scroll down. If you're not ready yet then here's one more clue to make things a lot easier:

Quordle today (game #1695) — hint #5 — starting letters (2)

Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.

Quordle today (game #1695) — the answers

The answers to today's Quordle, game #1695, are…

• SHUSH
• LITHE
• DELTA
• BUGLE

Sometimes the Quordle gods are on your side and every guess you make is correct.

That’s what today felt like — although I did come very close to entering “bulge” instead of BUGLE.

Daily Sequence today (game #1695) — the answers

The answers to today's Quordle Daily Sequence, game #1695, are…

• GULLY
• CUMIN
• BARON
• BASIS

Quordle answers: The past 20

• Quordle #1694, Monday, 14 September: ZEBRA, LEGAL, RATIO, TROLL
• Quordle #1693, Sunday, 13 September: LUCID, SPRAY, MANGE, EMAIL
• Quordle #1692, Saturday, 12 September: SUPER, BRUSH, RESET, SOWER
• Quordle #1691, Friday, 11 September: PLUSH, PAINT, RIVAL, AFOUL
• Quordle #1690, Thursday, 10 September: AGENT, EXILE, TITAN, PUREE
• Quordle #1689, Wednesday, 9 September: HAPPY, GONER, SMACK, MOTIF
• Quordle #1688, Tuesday, 8 September: FLUNG, DIARY, HALVE, BERTH
• Quordle #1687, Monday, 7 September: VISIT, CLANK, FEVER, OCEAN
• Quordle #1686, Sunday, 6 September: PILOT, HONOR, BOWEL, TAUNT
• Quordle #1685, Saturday, 5 September: GNASH, GEEKY, WHELP, PUTTY
• Quordle #1684, Friday, 4 September: QUICK, BEEFY, TRUCK, SNAIL
• Quordle #1683, Thursday, 3 September: SIGMA, ESSAY, MERRY, LLAMA
• Quordle #1682, Wednesday, 2 September: INCUR, FELLA, TITAN, FROZE
• Quordle #1681, Tuesday, 1 September: NASAL, ROUTE, ANKLE, MIGHT
• Quordle #1680, Monday, 31 August: ALIVE, LOUSE, ABOVE, MOSSY
• Quordle #1679, Sunday, 30 August: USING, SORRY, FILET, PIPER
• Quordle #1678, Saturday, 29 August: OVINE, ALLOY, VOICE, CARVE
• Quordle #1677, Friday, 28 August: WAIST, EDICT, BONUS, DEUCE
• Quordle #1676, Thursday, 27 August: SHEEN, TRICE, WAGON, BEVEL
• Quordle #1675, Wednesday, 26 August: OPIUM, EPOCH, BESET, FINER

Strands is the NYT's latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it's great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc's Wordle today page for the original viral word game.

SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Strands today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.

NYT Strands today (game #926) - hint #1 - today's theme

NYT Strands today (game #926) - hint #2 - clue words

Play any of these words to unlock the in-game hints system.

• HINT
• BREAD
• SING
• LIAR
• BONK
• RANCH

NYT Strands today (game #926) - hint #3 - spangram letters

NYT Strands today (game #926) - hint #4 - spangram position

Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.

NYT Strands today (game #926) - the answers

The answers to today's Strands, game #926, are…

• JOIST
• BOLT
• HINGE
• NAIL
• KNOB
• BRACKET
• ANCHOR
• SCREW
• SPANGRAM: HARDWARE

• My rating: Easy
• My score: Perfect

This felt like a game chock-full of words. Indeed, I got my first two — JOIST and BOLT — without even looking, and here was me thinking the theme might be hinting at the classic baseball movie Field of Dreams with its tagline of “If you build it, they will come”.

Although come to think of it maybe it it is about Field of Dreams after all, as all of the words could be connected to the construction of bleachers.

Anyway, as well as plenty of words in the actual game there were also a myriad number of easily spottable non-game words. I thought identifying HINT was quite meta.

Yesterday's NYT Strands answers (Monday, September 14, game #925)

• EXCLAIM
• START
• GASP
• RECOIL
• FREEZE
• SHUDDER
• SPANGRAM: THATSSHOCKING

Good morning! Let's play Connections, the NYT's clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need Connections hints.

What should you do once you've finished? Why, play some more word games of course. I've also got daily Strands hints and answers and Quordle hints and answers articles if you need help for those too, while Marc's Wordle today page covers the original viral word game.

SPOILER WARNING: Information about NYT Connections today is below, so don't read on if you don't want to know the answers.

NYT Connections today (game #1192) - today's words

Today's NYT Connections words are…

• PLANT
• COACH
• WHISTLE
• DESSERT
• HANDLE
• CABOOSE
• DECEMBER
• SLEEPER
• DIRECT
• TRAIN
• LID
• ASSET
• SPOUT
• MOLE
• EPILOGUE
• GUIDE

NYT Connections today (game #1192) - hint #1 - group hints

What are some clues for today's NYT Connections groups?

• YELLOW: Tell someone what to do
• GREEN: Used to boil water for tea
• BLUE: Secret agent
• PURPLE: Tagged on

Need more clues?

We're firmly in spoiler territory now, but read on if you want to know what the four theme answers are for today's NYT Connections puzzles…

NYT Connections today (game #1192) - hint #2 - group answers

What are the answers for today's NYT Connections groups?

• YELLOW: INSTRUCT
• GREEN: PARTS OF A WHISTLING KETTLE
• BLUE: UNDERCOVER OPERATIVE
• PURPLE: THINGS THAT APPEAR AT THE END

Right, the answers are below, so DO NOT SCROLL ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM.

NYT Connections today (game #1192) - the answers

The answers to today's Connections, game #1192, are…

• YELLOW: INSTRUCT: COACH, DIRECT, GUIDE, TRAIN
• GREEN: PARTS OF A WHISTLING KETTLE: HANDLE, LID, SPOUT, WHISTLE
• BLUE: UNDERCOVER OPERATIVE: ASSET, MOLE, PLANT, SLEEPER
• PURPLE: THINGS THAT APPEAR AT THE END: CABOOSE, DECEMBER, DESSERT, EPILOGUE

• My rating: Hard
• My score: 2 mistakes

I knew that CABOOSE is the car at the back of a train, but it took me three guesses to get the other three tiles for THINGS THAT APPEAR AT THE END.

My error was including LID and HANDLE instead of DECEMBER. Obvious when you see them all together.

Anyway, I was delighted to score my 54th 'Purple first' despite the struggle to get there.

The other groups were then easier to put together — my lifelong tea addiction and current Slow Horses binge being in my favor with PARTS OF A WHISTLING KETTLE and UNDERCOVER OPERATIVE.

Yesterday's NYT Connections answers (Monday, September 14, 2026, game #1191)

• YELLOW: WATERBIRDS: COOT, GOOSE, LOON, TEAL
• GREEN: INFORMANT: CANARY, RAT, SNITCH, STOOLIE
• BLUE: COMMON SINGLE-USE PLASTIC ITEMS: BAG, CUTLERY, STIRRER, STRAW
• PURPLE: ____GRASS: BLUE, CRAB, LEMON, WHEAT

• Indian Army opens lab built to expose hidden drone vulnerabilities.
• Chinese-origin chips face heavier scrutiny under new army protocols.
• AASHVAST technicians hunt hidden passwords buried inside drone control systems.

The Indian Army has opened a new laboratory in New Delhi designed to inspect military drones for hidden software flaws and unauthorized parts.

The Assessment and Analysis of Electronic Systems Hardware for Vulnerabilities and Security Threats (AASHVAST) facility checks whether a drone's components truly match what its documentation claims, flagging cases where parts appear to have been swapped in.

Investigators will pay particular attention to circuitry and chips that may have originated from Chinese suppliers rather than approved manufacturers listed in procurement records.

Hardware checks probe the drone's supply chain

According to Indian officials, even minor deviations in hardware markings or circuit layouts can trigger closer scrutiny of a drone's supply chain.

Technicians search each onboard controller and camera unit for concealed passwords, secret command pathways, and embedded encryption keys that could grant unauthorized access.

The team also checks for altered flight-control limits and tools that might allow someone to seize remote command of the aircraft.

They further confirm whether each drone will install only updates issued by its original manufacturer, closing off a common route for tampering.

The team also measures how well a drone's navigation holds up when exposed to jamming or spoofing signals meant to mislead it.

The entire process occurs without an internet connection, and no data from the tested drone can be copied to external systems.

Examination also proceeds without altering the drone's own software, so nothing is written back onto the hardware at any stage.

This offline design suggests an intent to prevent classified information from leaving army custody or falling into the wrong hands.

Once vulnerabilities are found, they are ranked by severity and gathered into a single written report.

That document lets the technician who tested the drone and the officer who approves it read identical information before signing off.

QuickPay Tech's software backs a wider army effort

AASHVAST runs on a software suite built by QuickPay Tech, a Noida-based UAV technology firm.

The suite is designed to flag altered code, unexpected components, and configuration changes that would otherwise go unnoticed during routine checks.

The laboratory sits inside the army's technical directorate, a body responsible for the technical evaluation and repair of a wide range of army vehicles and electronic systems.

General Dhiraj Seth, the army chief, formally inaugurated the site at Delhi Cantonment, marking its opening for wider use across the force.

Army officials say the initiative should improve the cyber defenses of sensitive platforms while supporting electronics manufactured within the country's defense sector.

However, analysts say that verifying hardware origin is only one part of ensuring a drone's overall airworthiness for operational deployment in the field.

Whether such scrutiny will meaningfully reduce reliance on foreign-sourced components across India's drone programs remains uncertain.

Via The Drone Front

The computing industry owes a lot to the guiding vision of Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, whose prediction about the pace of advancement in the computing industry has been a fixture for more than 50 years. But how much room does this rule have left to run?

Moore's Law

Moore, who was the president of Intel at the time, delivered his famous prediction – known as Moore's Law – at the 1975 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, according to the Computer History Museum.

This prediction, however, wasn't his first. A decade before, Moore authored an article titled 'Cramming more components onto integrated circuits' in which he predicted that the number of transistors crammed into integrated circuits would double every year.

The initial projections were incorrect, but he was confident that, thanks to advances in technology, his projection could be realized accurately if he updated his timelines.

It eventually became a self-fulfilling prophecy, with the semiconductor industry almost using this prediction as a benchmark against which to judge progress – with engineers challenged to deliver breakthroughs that ensured their work complied with Moore's Law.

The future of chipmaking

Moore's Law held up for many years, but the nature of exponential growth may not seem realistic, especially given there are hard physical constraints with the widely used silicon-based semiconductors.

Although there's no firm date at which Moore's Law no longer applied, there's a wide understanding that the doubling in transistor count every two years slowed down roughly 10 years ago.

In today's age, it's getting harder and harder to cram more transistors onto a single chip, although scientists are experimenting with new technologies or approaches that could ensure the continuation of progress. These ideas include 3D stacking as well as new semiconductor materials.

• Samsung clip-style earbuds appear leak again
• Now known as Galaxy Buds On, not Galaxy Buds Able
• Set to come with volume adaptation and head gestures

For a few months earlier in 2026, it really sounded like Samsung's debut clip-style earbuds were set to debut; even the Galaxy Wearable app leaked the Galaxy Buds Able. There's been silence for a few months… but it's starting to sound like the buds are still coming, albeit with a different name.

A new report from Samsung fan site SammyGuru has surfaced new information about the buds, now called the Galaxy Buds On, apparently. The site claims to have found information in Samsung's Buds Manager app that gives us another glimpse into the earbuds and their features.

Now, before you get excited for this new audio venture by Samsung, it's worth bearing in mind that the old question still stands: when will these come out? Some leaks are pointing to an October release for some new Samsung tablets, so the Buds On could come then.

But it's also possible that the brand will wait until 2027, when it's also rumored that we'll see some over-ear headphones from the company.

So under 'release date' we're putting an all-caps 'TBC', underlined several times in red pen. But the leak makes it sound like Samsung is finalizing some assets on the buds.

A range of Galaxy Buds 4 features

At the start of 2026, Samsung unveiled the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro (shown at the top of the post) and one of the big new features was head-tracking control. This lets you nod or shake your head to reject or accept an incoming call, among other functions, and it sounds like the Galaxy Buds On will also get this tool.

SammyGuru's leak also details a Volume Boost feature, which could be how Samsung plans to deal with the innate open earbud problem: having the drivers away from your earbud means the buds don't always sound great.

Another tool promises a second way to address the same problem: an Auto Volume feature could temporarily increase volume while you're somewhere loud, to compensate for the lack of noise cancellation.

Of course it's 2026, so there's also AI features: Gemini or Bixby can be activated by your saying a key phrase or tapping the buds. A potentially more-useful function is the ability to instantly record a voice memo by doing a certain touch gesture, something some rival earbuds already offer.

To summarize this leak, it reiterates the existence of the buds and runs through some features. But I've tested dozens of similar buds: the best open-ears live and die by their design, and the ways they overcome the form factor's innate issues to deliver decent-sounding music. So features aren't as important as the elements we've yet to hear about.

• Gartner predicts that around 33% of people laid off due to AI could be rehired by 2029
• Those rehired employees, presumably filling similar roles, will command higher salaries
• Further predictions point to 75% of organizations making cost savings from AI productivity being overtaken by competing companies with a stronger modernizing philosophy

People laid off from their roles due to a corporate refocusing on AI could soon find themselves rehired – or at least, their former roles being advertised, new Gartner research has claimed.

It predicts that by 2027, 75% of organizations who expected to make cost savings by focusing on AI productivity over human endeavor will be overtaken by companies who reinvested those savings in modernization and training.

Organizations which have made large cuts to their workforce in order to take advantage of perceived productivity boosts from automation could be forced to change to a new human-centric philosophy, where skills and abilities can be amplified while AI does the grunt work.

AI vs. management

Choices made by companies across all industries could be cause for regret in future, as the truth about how AI is used comes to light. Rather than being a disruptor of employment, the notion of intelligent automation may be considered as a missed opportunity by some organizations.

"When business and IT executives look back on the early AI era, they will realize their greatest mistake was believing that work automation was the point, when workforce amplification was the opportunity," noted Tori Paulman, VP analyst at Gartner.

That mistake – which could not only have severe consequences for the business – could have had striking impacts on individuals, all due to a misunderstanding of what AI can deliver.

"The competitive advantage will go to the CIOs and business executives,” continues Paulman, “who build an AI-shaped organization where AI value compounds by reshaping roles and allowing workflows to cross traditional boundaries, increasing velocity and reducing friction."

AI productivity... gains?

Gartner’s prediction appears to paint a bleak picture for any organization that has failed to amplify the talents and abilities of its employees after going all-in on AI. But there is still time to fix the damage. Its prediction of 2027 might only be a year away, but 2029 – when just short of 33% of employees are expected to need rehiring – is far enough down the line that there is time to start reorganizing now.

"Business and IT executives [...] should develop a 'talent remix' strategy that uses AI to reshape roles and redirect workers from less productive work to new opportunities," said Paulman.

The conclusion is that AI is better used to strengthen decision making, creativity, and leadership, rather than replacing people for misjudged producivity boosts.

• Socket found Twitch extension JeeBot harvesting OAuth tokens via proxy servers
• Tokens excluded only for 10 Russian streamer channels, suggesting deliberate design
• Developer issued fixes, but users should revoke exposed tokens for safety

A browser extension for Twitch was harvesting people’s OAuth tokens and sending them to a Russian-owned server. The move was deliberate, but whether or not it was malicious is not that easily determined.

Security researchers Socket recently found an extension for both Chrome and Firefox, called “Twitch Enhanced Viewer | JeeBot”. It has roughly 30,000 users on Chrome, and some 600 on Firefox.

On the Chrome Web Store, it is advertised as a “modern tool for streamers and viewers who value quality, convenience, and control.” Apparently, it makes streaming and viewing clearer, allows viewing content in 2K, hides banner ads and unwanted elements, and even offers an AI bot to make it easier to interact with the stream.

Hardcoded exemptions

According to the researchers, the extension is designed to retrieve Twitch’s video stream playlists through its own proxy servers. However, instead of simply forwarding the requests, the extension also attached users’ OAuth tokens, and since they were placed in the URL, the token also ended up in the proxy server’s request logs.

After being called out for it, the extension’s developer (HISHIMIRO/jeetbot.cc) released a new version 85.8.7 (for Firefox, the Chrome one is currently under review) which apparently fixes this flaw: when playlists are retrieved, the user’s OAuth token is no longer sent to the proxies. It would seem like this was an honest mistake that was remedied upon responsible disclosure. However, here is what Socket had to say about the way the tokens were being retrieved:

"Current builds (v85.x) forward the token inline as an &auth= query parameter on a network-layer redirect to the operator's proxy," Socket explained. "The token is forwarded for every channel the user watches, except a hardcoded allowlist of ten Russian streamer channels, whose sessions are exempted from forwarding."

If there was a list of 10 Russian streamer channels who were exempt from OAuth token retrieval, it’s safe to assume that the developer knew very well what they were doing.

It is good that the extensions were upgraded, but if you are using it, you should also revoke the exposed Twitch token, to be on the safe side.

Via The Hacker News

AI companies are now aligned: there is a non-zero chance that AI could somehow end humanity. It's not a probable future, but there's enough uncertainty that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, among others, agree that some slowdown and oversight in AI development is in order. Who vociferously doesn't agree? US President Donald Trump.

As the global freakout grows over AI's sometimes shocking ability to do things its makers never intended, Trump took to his Truth Social media platform to warn against AI guardrails.

"The only control or “guardrails” that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades! The Trump Administration has stopped AI “people” from doing bad, or potentially bad, “things,“ like Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a “perfect little angel” - and we will continue to do so! We already have tremendous CRIMINAL and REGULATORY power over these companies! There is a SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centers, and the only one that is happy about it is China. WHOEVER WINS AI, WINS! We are leading China, and all others, and will continue to do so. Conspiracy Theorists, Treasonists, Traitors, and Leakers, BEWARE!"

Aside from the dubious protection of his "High IQ!" Trump claims the US has AI regulation when it does not. Yes, there is a patchwork of proposed AI regulation proposals across the country's 50 states, but there is no federal-level regulation.

The President also conflates growing and very real concerns over data center development with humanity-ending AI anxiety. While AI model development and use is limited by Data Center growth, how AI works, and all the ways potential misalignment (when the action does not align with the original intent or best interests of people) could lead to harm is a different thing and more closely associated with regulation and oversight.

Dario Amodei receives specific mention because the White House tried unsuccessfully to label his company, Anthropic, a national security supply chain risk after it refused to let its models be used for military and mass surveillance. Trump's distaste for Anthropic and Amodei remains.

Meanwhile, watchdog groups continue to call for regulation, and they've made it clear they don't trust tech companies to do the job, even with promised embedded non-employee evaluators.

The Tech Bros can't do it

"We can’t trust the AI industry to regulate itself. We can’t really trust anything these self-interested billionaires say. But we should take them seriously that the technology they are building is dangerous," wrote Fight for the Future Director Evan Greer in a published statement. The non-profit tech watchdog group added, "It’s clear that these industry leaders think they are best positioned to craft AI policy for the good of all humanity. We think that’s horseshit. Lawmakers should be listening to independent experts, researchers, civil society, and the communities most impacted. They should craft policies that address AI harm without undermining open source models or entrenching the largest players."

It's not surprising that the organization, which advocates for tech policies that have a positive impact on disenfranchised and underrepresented minorities, has little trust in tech company promises.

Still, I wondered if Fight for the Future shares Trump and even Amodei's concern that one-sided regulation (in the US and not elsewhere) could give China the advantage in this all-important AI race.

What about China?

"Big Tech lobbyists have been using the boogeyman of China to avoid regulation for more than a decade now. It's one of their oldest dirty talking points, and it's frankly embarrassing that anyone in Congress is still buying this lie," Greer wrote to me in an email response.

Greer doesn't have much confidence in US Congress but told me the "issue is reaching the kind of boiling point that could lead to action. The real question is what will Congress do. Will they let giants like OpenAI and Anthropic write the laws that are supposed to regulate them? Or will they listen to experts and impacted communities?"

There is, Greer agreed, a need for regulation and coordination at an International level, but she believes it "should be driven by civil society, not by tech companies and billionaires."

If there's any good news in this, it's that AI's threat to humanity is not necessarily imminent.

Maybe it's not that bad

"I don't buy the extinction story," The Media Copilot founder and AI Consultant Pete Pachal told me via email.

"Reality has an incredibly strong status-quo bias, and most doom scenarios require society to just roll over in a way it never actually does. What I do worry about is alignment," Pachal wrote.

I've heard this over and over again from experts and in various analyses. AI is not acting to overthrow or harm humanity; it's interested in completing tasks in the most efficient way possible. Misalignment arises when it breaks rules to achieve those goals and when that rule-breaking can or does result in harm. As most people have noted, the Hugging Face incident, in which OpenAI models agreed to jump out of the sandbox and attack a third-party system at Hugging Face to achieve a goal, didn't result in any harm or financial loss. It was also an unfortunate proof of concept.

"You had a swarm of agents, and the ones that floated the idea of telling the humans what they were doing got talked out of it by the rest. That's not the Terminator, but it is a signal that these systems won't automatically act in the interest of the people running them," wrote Pachal

Like most experts, Pachal now supports a slowdown. Echoing Fight for the Future's Greer, Pachal believes he knows why so few in power are discussing or acting on it: "The only reason we're not seriously having that conversation is China, China, China. But I'd bet China doesn't want runaway AI either. Meanwhile, AI is scaling the good guys just as fast as the bad ones."

As it stands, there's a brewing showdown between Trump and, it seems, even people on his side of the political spectrum. Many of them read former Anthropic and OpenAI employee Jacon Coxon's original canary in a coal mine post on X with alarm.

Texas Senator Ted Cruz told The View that the thread was concerning and he believes AI poses "a catastrophic risk." And Vermont Democrat Senator Bernie Sanders claimed a recent poll showed, "the American people overwhelmingly want to ban artificial super intelligence and pause the development of AI until we establish clear safety standards.”

Meanwhile, Trump is, in essence, accusing those who oppose AI development and data centers of being traitors.

What's really going on?

A few things can be true at once. The US and China are in a heated AI development battle. China's more open approach to models has led some developers to turn to them to solve tough problems (like stopping the Hugging Face attack).

AI is increasingly turning into a powerful black box where recursive development means it's almost developing itself while keeping its processes hidden.

AI is becoming so complex that humans can no longer understand how it works.

However, while the ingredients for an AI mass extinction event might be there, AI still lacks the reliability to carry out such an attack. It also has no vested interest in doing so. Humans will long be the x-factor here. It's the tasks people give to AI systems and their intent.

The kind of rules AI has in place for not doing something that can lead to human harm are unclear. Also, disparate groups of people could put in requests to separate AI models that, when put together, do cause catastrophic harm. It's unclear if individual AI systems could see the big picture or would act to stop the action once they realize what's going on.

So yes, it seems regulation and oversight would be a good thing, as long as we don't lose our edge to China, which might have other priorities. One they certainly don't have is protecting US interests and its people.

• The US Department of Justice has accused Huawei of conspiring to steal secrets from five US companies
• Huawei is accused of a prolonged campaign of theft, covering a 20 year period
• Admissions from Huawei's chief financial officer, ⁠Meng Wanzhou, are set to be used as evidence in the trial

Court proceedings have begun against Huawei in the United States, with the US Department of Justice accusing the Chinese tech giant of stealing trade secrets from competing US companies.

Huawei – which unusually for Chinese companies operating abroad is owned entirely by its staff – has denied all accusations of industrial espionage, intellectual property, and any other wrongdoing.

While accused of stealing from companies that include Cisco and T-Mobile, Huawei’s defense is that it is simply innovating and doing business as a competitor.

Who has Huawei spied on?

Given the United States’ belligerent tone towards China under the current administration, that might seem a weak response. However, several concessions have been made to China in this case, not least the charges against Huawei's chief financial officer, ⁠Meng Wanzhou. While charges against her were dropped, her evidence is set to be used in the case against Huawei.

The accusations against Huawei are numerous, but the most attention is on its alleged industrial espionage. It is accused of stealing trade secrets and misappropriating intellectual property from T-Mobile US, Cisco Systems, Motorola, CNEX Labs, and Akhan Semiconductor.

In the US government’s opening statement, Department of Justice trial attorney Taylor Stout stated: "For 20 years […] Huawei, a massive Chinese telecommunications company, victimized ‌American companies and abused the American financial system, all in an effort to dominate the telecommunications industry around the world."

Inevitably, the defense claimed that everything was ordinary innovation, rather than criminal activity. “Huawei earned its success,” said Brian Heberling, defending. “It's about competition, not conspiracy. Innovation, not theft. Ordinary business dealings, not criminal conduct.”

State control?

The case also draws on a history of poor conduct from Huawei, which has been previously observed to have close ties with Skycom, a company that allegedly attempted to sell embargoed tech (specifically, Hewlett-Packard computer equipment) to an Iranian business.

Unlike other significant Chinese multinationals, Huawei is not state controlled. Rather, it is owned entirely by its staff, as opposed to an organization that might state-owned, have heavy state influence over them, or even “golden shares” that enable vetos or special board seats. Whether this was apparent to the US Department of Justice ahead of the initial investigation is not clear, but it does put a barrier against implications that the Chinese government were involved.

After taking eight years to come to trial, proceedings are expected to run for around three months.

The HP Envy 6165 is one of the cheapest inkjets around right now - and it does everything most home and home office users will need, making it one of the least expensive ways to add print, scan, and copy capability to a desk setup.

• Best for: Families, students, and remote workers who need a capable inkjet for printing, scanning, and copying.

• The deal: The HP Envy 6165 all-in-one printer is now $80 (was $160) at Best Buy.

• Why we like it: It's one of the cheapest inkjets around right now from a brand who performs well in our printer tests. HP has consistently delivered reliable home printing in our reviews. If you need a printer that just works - rather than one aimed at high-speed, high-volume print runs for small business use - this ticks all the boxes.

• The catch: As is typical with budget inkjet printers, it's not ultra-fast to print. I wouldn't consider it a deal-breaker for the occasional printing of documents and images, but if you're printing a lot of pages each month, a higher-end ink tank or laser printer will be best.

Why we recommend it

At $79.99, this is a genuinely low entry price for a wireless all-in-one that still covers the basics well: automatic two-sided printing, a 100-sheet tray so you aren't constantly reloading paper, and a touchscreen instead of button-only navigation. For a home office that just needs a printer on standby, that feature set is reasonable for the price.

HP's AI-assisted printing is a small but useful touch. It trims unnecessary content, ads, sidebars, and awkward page breaks from web pages and emails before they print, which cuts down on wasted paper and ink on a printer where every page counts a little more given the low purchase price.

The included 6-month Instant Ink trial is worth factoring into the value here too. It gives you a real window to test whether a subscription model fits how much you actually print before committing to ongoing cost.

For more top picks, see our guides to the best home printers, best inkjet printers, and the best cheap printers.

Price Context & Historical Value

This is a strong price for a printer with this feature set. A $80 drop from $159.99 to $79.99 is a 50 percent discount, and it puts a printer with AI-assisted printing and a touchscreen under $80, a price point usually reserved for far more basic models.

Should you buy it?

✅ Buy the HP Envy 6165 if... you need a basic, reliable printer for a home office without paying much, you print occasionally rather than in high volume, or you want the flexibility to try Instant Ink for free before deciding whether to keep it.

❌ Skip the HP Envy 6165 if... you print in high volume and need faster speeds than 10 pages per minute in black, you do not want to track an Instant Ink trial that bills automatically once it ends, or you specifically need a laser printer for crisp text at scale.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

Print speeds are modest at 10 pages per minute (ppm) in black and 7ppm in color, so this is not the printer for anyone printing in volume. Instant Ink also bills automatically once the 6-month trial ends unless you cancel, and like most HP printers, dynamic security limits which third-party cartridges will work, so check compatibility before assuming any off-brand ink will work.

• See all printer deals at Best Buy.

• Leeds vs Newcastle: Today (Mon, Sep. 14) at 8pm BST / 3pm ET / 5am AEST (Tue)
• Streams: USA Network via YouTube TV (10-day free trial) (US) / Sky Sports (UK)
• Unlock your stream with NordVPN (try 100% risk free)

Today's Leeds vs Newcastle live streams sees two teams who have made unbeaten starts to the Premier League 2026/27 season meet at Elland Road in what promises to be an enthralling Monday-night clash.

Daniel Farke's side finished last term strongly and have carried their good form into the new campaign, taking five points from their first three games. Their most recent league outing was a 1-1 draw at Brighton nine days ago in which they had enough chances to win, before losing 6-3 at Chelsea in a chaotic Carabao Cup third-round clash last Wednesday. Leeds went 2-0 up despite Farke making eight changes to his starting XI, so it remains to be seen if any of the players who got the nod at Stamford Bridge did enough to keep their place. Ilia Gruev could return to the squad after missing the start of the season with a knee injury, but Joe Rodon (hamstring) remains unavailable.

Newcastle boss Matthias Jaissle made only three changes to his lineup for the 1-0 Carabao Cup win at Millwall on Tuesday, but he may wish he had given Amar Dedic a rest after the right-back suffered a hamstring injury at The Den. The £30million summer signing is now doubtful for the trip to Elland Road in a significant blow for the Magpies. Dedic's excellent performances have helped Newcastle take five points from their opening three Premier League matches, although they needed a late Jacob Ramsey equalizer to draw 2-2 at home to Bournemouth last Saturday. Deadline-day signing Matias Fernandez-Pardo is yet to start a game for his new club having come off the bench against Bournemouth and Millwall.

Read on to find out how to watch Leeds vs Newcastle in the 2026/27 Premier League from anywhere in the world, including for free.

How to watch Leeds vs Newcastle for FREE

USA Network are showing Leeds vs Newcastle in the US and you can watch for free via a multitude of cord-cutting free trials.

YouTube TV (10-days), Fubo (5-days) and DirecTV Stream (5-days) all come with free trials and access to USA Network.

Abroad? NordVPN can unlock these cord-cutters from anywhere in the world.

Use a VPN to watch Leeds vs Newcastle from anywhere

A VPN is a handy piece of software that can make your device appear as if it's back in your home country, thereby letting you unlock your usual streaming service. The best VPN right now? We recommend NordVPN – it does everything and comes with a 75% discount.

It's really straightforward to use a VPN to watch Leeds vs Newcastle.

1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite.

2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For example, if you want to watch the Sky Sports stream, select 'United Kingdom' from the listed countries.

3. Sit back and enjoy the action. Head to Sky Go and tune into Leeds vs Newcastle.

How to watch Leeds vs Newcastle live streams in the USA

Leeds vs Newcastle will be shown on USA Network in the US.

To access USA Network you can use a variety of cord-cutting options; Fubo, YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV and Sling TV all carry the channel.

Sling TV is the cheapest monthly option at present while the other three offer free trials of varying lengths.

Outside the US for this EPL clash? Use NordVPN to unlock your stream of Leeds vs Newcastle.

How to watch Leeds vs Newcastle live streams in the UK

Sky Sports is broadcasting Leeds vs Newcastle in the UK on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Premier League.

Packages cost £35 per month for new customers, or £22 per month if you already have a Sky TV contract. The Sky Go app lets you watch on your laptop, mobile or tablet.

Fans can also tune in using a NOW Sports Membership, with 24-hour passes costing £14.99.

Not in the UK for Leeds vs Newcastle? Use NordVPN to access your usual Premier League streams.

How to watch Leeds vs Newcastle live streams in Canada

Fubo is broadcasting every EPL game this season in Canada, including Leeds vs Newcastle.

Prices start from CA$31.49 per month for Fubo's flexible Sports Monthly package. However, the best option right now is the Quarterly Package, which costs just CA$27.99 CA$14.99 for each of the first three months. You can also watch Fubo's content if you have a selected DAZN subscription in Canada.

Not in Canada? Use NordVPN to access your Leeds vs Newcastle live streams from anywhere in the world.

How to watch Leeds vs Newcastle live streams in Australia

Leeds vs Newcastle will be broadcast on Stan Sport in Australia.

Stan Sport subscriptions start at AU$29.99 per month, which includes the base plan (from AU$9.99) with the sport add-on (AU$20).

Missing Leeds vs Newcastle because you're outside Australia? Use a VPN to login to your Stan Sport account.

We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example:1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service).2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad.We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.

• CISA added GitLab CVE‑2026‑85706, a critical path traversal flaw, to its KEV catalog
• Exploitation already observed; attackers can read sensitive files via commits API without authentication
• GitLab patched in CE/EE 19.3.2, 19.2.6, and 19.1; agencies given three days to update

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added a new GitLab vulnerability to its KEV catalog, warning users that it is being actively exploited in the wild.

GitLab has now updated its Community Edition (CE) and Enterprise Edition (EE) versions to 19.3.2, 19.2.6, and 19.1, fixing a range of vulnerabilities. Among them were two critical-severity ones: a path traversal issue in repository commits API, and an Insecure Deserialization issue in GraphQL subscription serializer.

The former is tracked as CVE-2026-85706, with a severity score of 10/10. It stems from missing authentication enforcement and improper path confinement in the repository commits API, allowing unauthenticated threat actors to read various sensitive information such as login credentials or secrets.

Added to KEV

In the advisory, GitLab did not mention anything about the flaws being abused in the wild - however, a separate report from cybersecurity experts watchTowr, released a day later, claimed so:

"watchTowr Intel is already observing in-the-wild probes for the latest critical GitLab Path Traversal vulnerability, CVE-2026-85706, which allows attackers to read arbitrary files in a single HTTP request," the researchers said.

"Based on recent GitLab vulnerabilities, we know the time until indiscriminate exploitation is likely not far away. [..] Defenders should also hunt through log files for HTTP POST requests to '/api/v4/projects/{id}/repository/commits/' URIs containing 'file.path' parameters to identify potential exploitation attempts."

At the same time, CISA added this bug to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, confirming the claims and giving government users a tiny three-day window to apply the patch.

GitLab is an intelligent orchestration platform for DevSecOps professionals, helping organizations automate and streamline the software development cycle. It has more than 50 million registered users, among which are roughly 50% of Fortune 100 companies, as per an SEC filing.

Via BleepingComputer

• A coalition of privacy organizations is urging the EU to intervene against Canada's Bill C-22
• The proposed law could compel European tech companies to weaken encryption and retain user metadata
• This follows a massive backlash in Canada from major tech giants and leading VPN providers

In a last-ditch effort to protect end-to-end encryption, digital rights advocates are calling on the European Union to intervene against Canada's controversial Bill C-22.

Also known as the Lawful Access Act, the proposed legislation threatens to force technology companies into building surveillance capabilities that can help law enforcement and intelligence services access digital information during high-stakes investigations.

Access Now, alongside a coalition of European civil society organizations, has published an open letter urging European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and other top EU officials to step in.

The groups warn that Bill C-22 is not just a domestic issue, as its sweeping data retention mandates and surveillance requirements will inherently compromise the privacy of millions of people globally.

For privacy-conscious users relying on secure messaging apps or the best VPN to keep their digital lives private, the stakes couldn't be higher. If passed, Bill C-22 could grant Canadian authorities the power to secretly compel European-based companies to comply with data demands, completely bypassing traditional oversight and transparency.

Namrata Maheshwari, Global Encryption Policy Lead and Asia Pacific Policy Manager at Access Now, warns that the bill threatens to normalize excessive surveillance powers, while converting "devices that work for people into devices that work against them."

"Steps must be taken to prevent it from becoming law," Maheshwari added.

NEW: Leave No Trace — A weekly newsletter on digital privacy and online surveillance.

Leave No Trace investigates the companies and governments putting our digital freedom at risk — and the people fighting back.

📩 Subscribe now to get every edition delivered to your inbox every Friday, launching this September.

What’s at stake for Europe?

While Canada's Lawful Access Act may sound like a local concern, the legislation has an aggressive extraterritorial reach. The open letter suggests that Bill C-22 would apply to any service provider whose platform is used by people in Canada.

Digital rights experts also warn the new rules would target providers with zero Canadian users, provided they belong to a corporate group carrying out business activity in the country.

The coalition argues that a Canadian minister would have the authority to secretly order a European company to weaken the security of products used across the EU.

Because a deliberate weakness built for one target ultimately compromises the entire system, experts warn that this effectively serves as a backdoor for mass surveillance.

This is why advocates stress that "Europe should not stay silent" and publicly declare that measures weakening encryption are entirely incompatible with the EU’s own fundamental rights, particularly as the EU and Canada are currently negotiating a Digital Trade Agreement.

With the Canadian Senate expected to conclude its study of the bill as early as October 2026, time for the EU to apply pressure is rapidly running out.

The growing privacy backlash

The open letter to the EU is just the latest development in a massive tech backlash against the Canadian government. Bill C-22 has faced fierce opposition from almost every corner of the cybersecurity industry, with top executives arguing that backdoors cannot safely exist.

Leading tech firms have already drawn a hard line in the sand. Google also joined the privacy backlash, warning that the law would fundamentally break end-to-end encryption.

Meanwhile, the top privacy tools on the market, including Signal, Apple, and leading VPNs, are fighting the surveillance law tooth and nail. From Canada-based Windscribe to ExpressVPN, NordVPN, and ProtonVPN, companies reassured users that they would rather leave the country than undermine their no-log infrastructure.

Ultimately, the cybersecurity community remains united: introducing systemic vulnerabilities for law enforcement creates the very same weaknesses that malicious actors and foreign adversaries will exploit.

If Canada moves forward with the legislation in its current state, it risks isolating its citizens from the world's most secure digital services.

• Apple is reportedly working on Beats-branded game controllers for iPhones
• Mark Gurman says Apple has been working on them for almost a year
• Gurman suggests the Beats team is leading on both 'product engineering and conception'

Apple seemingly continues to show its devotion to gaming with something that's in the pipeline for iOS gamers.

As reported by PC Mag, macOS 26.7 code references two unreleased iPhone game controllers, and Bloomberg's Mark Gurman suggests Apple has been working on them for almost a year. More importantly, though, Gurman says these controllers could launch under the Beats brand.

The controllers are codenamed T6502 and T1057 according to MacRumors (which discovered the references), with different haptic designs alongside a standard game controller's features. Beats, which was acquired by Apple in 2014, is a brand often used for its own popular audio products (of course), but also for USB-C cables and some iPhone cases.

Now, it appears as though Beats may well represent gaming accessories for Apple going forward, and Gurman claims these controllers are being led by Beats executives in both "product engineering and conception".

It's a potential move that comes at a convenient time for iPhone owners intrigued by gaming, as the RAM crisis continues to impact the PC hardware and games console market. Gurman observes that Apple sees gaming accessories such as those for phones as a "growing market and wants in".

Game controller and speaker hybrid?

If this does indeed happen, it seems somewhat bizarre to have Beats producing game controllers, as it's quite a switch from the traditional audio products. Fortunately though, it opens the door to some surprising designs, and I'm thinking specifically of the audio side of the equation when connecting the purported controllers to an iPhone.

Maybe Beats could look to do something similar to Asus and its ROG Phone AeroActive Coolers, which feature shoulder buttons for gaming alongside a built-in subwoofer for a significant boost in bass and audio quality. No, these ROG peripherals aren't full game controllers, but they effectively illustrate what could be realized with a hybrid speaker and controller combo.

Based on the brief design description from the references found in macOS, alongside Gurman's report, it's hard to say that the rumored peripherals will be anything other than simple controllers. But there are presumably opportunities for clever design twists, particularly given the Beats branding.

If this Beats rumor turns out to be true, it's clear that Apple is looking to serve a market that is growing amid the RAM crisis, and hoping to leverage the accessibility that comes with iPhones for gaming.

This is one of the cleverest docking stations I've ever seen from Anker (or anyone else for that matter). This 13-in-1 dock with a detachable hub supports everything from triple display output to 100W laptop charging over a single cable.

• Best for: Remote workers, creators, gamers, and office professionals who want a multi-monitor setup at home with a compact travel hub for on the move.

• The deal: The Anker Nano 13-in-1 dock is discounted to $120 (was $150) at Amazon. In the UK, the dock is now £100 (was £130).

• Why we like it: This docking station features 13 ports, with support for three-monitor set ups, and a 100W PD for charging smaller devices like phones and laptops. But what really stands out to me is the detachable 6-in-1 hub. So, you can leave the bulky main hub on your desk and take the small unit with you on the commute.

• The catch: macOS users will get mirrored external displays, rather than independent extended displays. If you don't need the extra ports and power delivery, a cheap docking station for hooking up mice and keyboards is perfectly suitable.

Why we recommend it

The triple display support is the main draw for a home office upgrade. Switching from a single laptop screen to two or three monitors through one cable is one of the most noticeable productivity upgrades you can make to a desk setup.

Anker's combination of two HDMI ports and a DisplayPort covers most monitor configurations without adapters. This allows up to 4K at 60Hz on a single screen, or dual 2K at 60Hz.

The detachable 6-in-1 hub is a genuinely practical design choice. It means the dock doesn't have to be an all-or-nothing desk fixture; you can pull the smaller hub off and take it with you when you only need basic connectivity away from your main setup.

100W of pass-through charging is enough for most laptops on the market, so this can realistically replace your laptop's charger at the desk while also handling displays, Ethernet, and peripherals through the same cable.

Price Context & Historical Value

A $30 drop from $149.99 to $119.99 is a 20 percent discount. Third-party price tracking shows this dock has dipped as low as $104.49 previously, so $119.99 is a solid price but not the lowest it has ever been. It is still a meaningful saving over the regular price for anyone who has been waiting to buy.

Should you buy it?

✅ Buy the Anker Nano docking station if... you want to run two or three monitors off a single laptop cable, you need Ethernet for a more reliable home office connection than Wi-Fi, or you want a hub that detaches into a smaller, travel-friendly piece when you do not need the full docking setup.

❌ Skip the Anker Nano docking station if... your laptop or monitors cannot make use of triple display output, you need faster charging than 100W for a larger laptop, or you are looking for the absolute cheapest single-purpose USB-C hub rather than a full docking station.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

Since macOS doesn't support Multi-Stream Transport over USB-C, and this docking station use a single-cable setup, monitors will mirror the main screen, instead of showing independently. That's not an issue on Windows. User reviews also note that charging speed can be slower when the dock is also driving multiple displays and peripherals at once, so heavy multitaskers with power-hungry laptops should keep expectations realistic.

• See more docking station deals at Amazon.

Apple has traditionally kept the iPad closer to the iPhone in terms of core functionality (even after it released iPadOS as a standalone software package in 2019), but iPadOS 26 marked a distinct shift towards making the iPad feel more Mac-like.

And honestly, this change in direction made sense. After all, iPads now run MacBook-level M-series chips; the iPad Pro (2025), for instance, uses the M5. They also let you run background exports in creative apps, switch audio sources while podcasting, and complete many more high-level productivity tasks.

One excellent addition in iPadOS 26 was the arrival of the Menu Bar, which acts as a facsimile of the macOS version of the same feature. But having used iPadOS 27, which launches today (September 14), since its launch in beta earlier this year, I can confidently say that this new software package makes the iPad feel more Mac-like than ever — and the Menu Bar is once again responsible for that.

Passing the bar

As mentioned, the Menu Bar is about as Mac as it gets, offering app-specific options at the top of the iPad screen. It’s as synonymous with macOS as the Dock, and it’s one of the core features that take some getting used to when switching from a Windows PC to a Mac.

On Mac, the Menu Bar is permanent. It sits at the top of the screen for easy access and highlights which app you’re currently using (something that’s particularly useful if you’re juggling multiple apps and keyboard shortcuts), but in iPadOS 26 it wasn’t, meaning it could be just as much of a hindrance as it was a help.

Thankfully, iPadOS 27 ensures the Menu Bar is always available, and while there are still some things I wish I could do on Apple’s tablet, the ability to affix the Menu Bar permanently is a change I welcome.

To do so, once you’ve updated to iPadOS 27, open Settings and select ‘Multitasking & Gestures’ on the left-hand sidebar. You’ll have to be on the Windowed Apps or Stage Manager option to be able to see the Menu Bar.

From here, look for a toggle labelled ‘Automatically Show and Hide Menu Bar’. If it’s on, turn it off, and you’ll see the Menu Bar consistently across apps, unless you’re watching something in full-screen mode. If you get fed up with it, just toggle that ‘Automatically Show and Hide Menu Bar’ option back on, and it’ll disappear again.

Still a way to go

Once you’ve toggled that setting, you can enjoy having the Menu Bar at the top of your iPad screen, but there are some caveats to be aware of.

For one, it’s not particularly useful if you use your iPad with your finger. The Menu Bar is much more suited to using a mouse, trackpad, or the Apple Pencil. I use the Magic Keyboard and, as ridiculously pricey as it was, this feature makes my whole iPad much more useful.

The other thing to be aware of is that the Menu Bar can’t be customized with third-party apps in the same way that long-running Mac ones like Bartender can. Sadly, it remains static in terms of what you can put on the right-hand side of it. Maybe one day that’ll change, but I can’t see Apple rolling out utility apps on its iPadOS platform anytime soon.

Finally, some nifty features to be aware of: you can still drag down from the right-hand side of the Menu Bar to access the Control Center (which is customizable, thankfully), and the left-hand side still takes you to your notifications (although I do wish this was a column on the side of the screen à la the macOS notification centre, rather than taking up the whole screen).

You can also drag down from the middle of the Menu Bar to access Siri AI, which is new in iPadOS 27 and makes Apple’s voice assistant much more useful.

So, what do you think? Is this the closest we’ll ever get to a MacPad? Or are you sticking with the Mac for now and leaving the iPad for content consumption? Let me know in the comments below.

• The Google Fitbit Air is getting some new features introduced with the Google Pixel Watch 5
• Health Guardian includes Insulin Resistance Trends, Blood Pressure Trends and Sleep Breathing Quality
• These features are not behind a Google Health Premium subscription, and are available on the Google Health app for free

The Google Fitbit Air is one of the best cheap fitness trackers, a $99.99 / £84.99 / AU$199 fitness band that offers a basic level of fitness tracking within its free tier, and an advanced AI-powered fitness coach with an additional premium subscription. We liked it at the free tier, although the app is a bit limited, and the premium experience will depend on your tolerance for interacting with chatbots.

However, both tiers are about to get a little bit better, which means the Fitbit Air is becoming even better value, with the addition of Google's new Health Guardian suite of features. The suite comprises a trio of tools, introduced earlier this year on the Google Pixel Watch 5. News site Gadgets & Wearables dug through version 5.07.2 of the app and found the three new features in the app's code.

Pixel Watches get four new tools rather than three, but Google's Breathing Emergency Detection requires the watch's emergency contact and notification infrastructure, which the screenless Fitbit Air doesn't have.

What's new

First up for the new tools is Insulin Resistance Trends. Insulin Resistance is an important metric, as it tells you how sensitively your body responds to blood sugar, and insulin resistance is of course a major precursor to type-2 diabetes. This metric "analyzes multi-week physiological data to track shifts in your metabolic health", pointing at resistance levels going up and down. However, for truly accurate blood sugar metrics, you'll need something like a continuous glucose monitor.

Next up is Blood Pressure Trends, which "passively measure your pulse and motion patterns throughout the month to estimate your blood pressure trends without requiring a cuff or manual calibration". Blood pressure via LED technology is very new to wearables, and it's amazing to see it in a device this cheap. However, it's worth noting this isn't a replacement for a cuff, just a likely indicator of trend. You'll still need regular measurement with either a cuff or a doctor's appointment for anything serious, but it can be an indication to start paying attention to your blood pressure.

Finally, Sleep Breathing Quality is a sleep feature showing you how much time you spent in 'optimal breathing' the night before. Google Health Coach, the AI chatbot you get in the app's premium tier, can offer advice about how to improve this based on your sleep score and other contextual information.

In fact, while you get the basic numbers for all three new metrics, the Google Health Coach can dip in and surface these stats to offer actionable advice. For example, you can use your Insulin Resistance Trends in combination with your nutrition logging to allow the coach to help you make a meal plan to bring that number down.

Worth buying?

While I'm not the biggest fan of Google's AI Health Coach, I did like the Fitbit Air as a whole, and new, useful, actionable metrics can only add to its already-excellent value proposition.

Whoop can estimate daily blood pressure ranges, but it doesn't offer an Insulin Resistance Trends metric, for example, whereas the Garmin Cirqa doesn't cover blood pressure estimates or insulin. Both competitor wearables have SPO2 blood oxygen sensors, however.

Health Guardian tools are only general indicators of your body's trends. However, if any of these metrics matter to you, for many people the Google Fitbit Air is cheap enough that these new features could be an incentive to pick one up over its more expensive rivals.

After eight years of bouncing around various cities and job roles, I decided to move back to the countryside where I grew up – all during the 2020 lockdown chaos. I wanted my kids to enjoy the same outdoor freedom I had as a child, and for the most part, a return to rural living lived up to the dream.

All except for one considerable headache: power outages.

It seemed like any level of weather led to power cuts that would last anywhere from just a few minutes to over 12 hours. Heavy rain? Power cut. A few days of dry weather? Power cut. A bit of wind? Power cut.

Erratic weather meant constant disruption – a small inconvenience for some, but a recipe for disaster when you're running a home office and trying to keep two kids entertained. I needed to find a reliable solution.

A powerful solution

I’d be dramatic if I said the regular power cuts made me consider moving, but with two of us working entirely from home and two kids to keep entertained, they have been incredibly frustrating.

I’d already spent a week looking at various power stations when Jackery contacted me asking if I wanted to review the Jackery 2000 v2 power station. Was this the solution I was looking for? I jumped at the chance.

A few days later, a hefty box arrived at my door. After a considerable amount of time removing the packaging, I was faced with the unit. I plugged it in and forgot about it.

The dinner incident

Anyone with young kids with healthy appetites will know that any delay in promised ‘feeding times’ can lead to full meltdowns, and honestly, as a man in my mid-thirties, I’m much the same.

On this particular night, I’d already had to take emergency measures, giving out snacks to stop the endless ‘when is dinner ready?’ questions. So when I heard the sudden click and noticed the air fryer had stopped making its familiar hum, my heart sank.

Panic set in. Should I order takeaway? No, it will take too long. Is ok to give my kids ice cream for dinner? No, that’s bad parenting.

Then it clicked - the power station. I raced to the cupboard I was keeping it in and carried it to the side. I plugged in the air fryer and pressed the button, half expecting it not to work. Then the familiar hum returned. Pure relief.

After 25 minutes of cooking, the battery had only dropped about 20%. The mini pizzas were saved, the meltdown was avoided, and my sanity was still intact.

A big deal?

The Jackery 2000 v2 is certainly competitive compared to other similarly priced power stations, but it isn’t revolutionary, and it doesn’t solve my issue 100%.

After all, when I have a power cut, I still have a challenge keeping my fridge/freezer running; I can’t charge my car; and, with all my power coming from one unit, I can’t run my laptop in one room whilst my kids watch TV in the other. Yet it has still become one of those products where I start to wonder how I ever lived without it.

I admit that I went back and forth when researching power stations. Although I knew I would use one, they aren’t the cheapest products. Could I really justify making a purchase of that size?

Now, if I look at how many times the Jackery 2000 v2 has come to the rescue, whether when trying to work, cook dinner, or access power when camping, it feels like a very worthwhile investment. Especially when I consider that with just one unit, I will enjoy a level of power security for years to come.

• Microsoft warns of a sophisticated campaign tricking users into updating passkeys via fake IT calls
• Victims redirected to adversary‑in‑the‑middle sites mimicking Microsoft login to steal access
• Attackers exfiltrate files from SharePoint, OneDrive, and Exchange; phishing‑resistant MFA advised

Passkeys have made stealing passwords obsolete. To work around this change, hackers have started tricking users into authenticating on attacker-controlled computers. This is according to a new report from Microsoft, which says there’s a highly sophisticated campaign currently taking place, with the goal of compromising people’s cloud accounts and stealing as many sensitive files as possible.

The attack starts a lot earlier than what the victim experiences. There is a lot of pre-attack planning and due diligence, in which the threat actors gather as much information about their target as possible. Knowing their place of work, position, and personal phone number is essential.

Once all the pieces are in place, the attack starts with a phone call - victims are told they are speaking to their organization’s IT help desk and that they need to update their passkey (or MFA, depending on the setup) immediately, to avoid any disruptions to their operations.

Follow-up SMS

In the follow-up to the call, the victims then receive an SMS message with a link where they can update their security configuration. On the surface, the website looks like the legitimate Microsoft login landing page. In reality, though, this is a pre-built malicious website that uses the adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) techniques to either receive access on the actor’s behalf, or capture credentials.

"The actor appears to invest heavily in pre-attack research, likely gathering information about employees and organizational structure from public sources such as social networking and professional profiling platforms," Microsoft said. "In a smaller number of cases, actors take advantage of already compromised accounts to expand their reach" by sending similar passkey-themed messages via Microsoft Teams.

The campaign is apparently ongoing since at least May this year, Microsoft, said, without detailing the number of victims. Its aim seems to be to exfiltrate files from SharePoint and OneDrive, as well as email data from Microsoft Exchange Online. It also did not attribute this campaign to any specific threat actor, although it did say that there are many collectives engaged in such, or similar, campaigns, including Cordial Spider, Storm-3121, and others.

Via The Hacker News

When Jon Woodard proudly installed the latest security technology on his Oxfordshire home, including a Ring video doorbell and a security camera on his shed, little did he realise that it would result in a landmark case that was to set him back thousands of pounds in damages.

The dispute began innocently enough with an invitation from Mr Woodard to his neighbour, Dr Mary Fairhurst, for a tour of his newly renovated home during which he showcased his then cutting-edge security setup. But it soon descended into an acrimonious battle when, in the words of the judgement, Dr Fairhurst was "alarmed and appalled" to discover that the camera mounted on Mr Woodard’s shed pointed directly at her property.

As well as objecting to live video footage being streamed directly to Mr Woodard’s smartphone, the court heard how she found the audio data which captured her private conversations "even more problematic and detrimental than video data.” And when the case landed in Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke upheld claims that the devices "unjustifiably invaded" Fairhurst’s privacy and their use breached the Data Protection Act 2018 as well as UK General Data Protection (GDPR) legislation.

Crucially, the court singled out the audio data collected by the cameras as being "more problematic and detrimental than video data" because it captured conversations from people who were entirely unaware that a device was listening or that audio was being processed. As a result, Mr Woodard was ordered to pay damages and a fine believed to total up to £100,000.

Speaking at the time of the case in October 2021, digital privacy expert Hannah Hart of Pro Privacy told the BBC: “While this case doesn’t set a legal precedent, it does continue an ongoing conversation about our changing attitude towards domestic surveillance — and how normalised it has become in our communities.”

Navigating legal boundaries of home surveillance

Five years on from the landmark case and the risk of falling foul of the law with home security equipment has only grown as new technology such as facial recognition has become commonplace, and users have turned to social media to post video footage taken with their security cameras and video doorbells.

And while understanding what you can and can’t do with domestic cameras does vary between regions, in most countries there is legislation in place to protect the privacy of individuals whose images and, potentially voices, are captured on these devices. As Lisa Sweetman, Partner in the Commercial Team specialising in Data Protection at legal firm Knights told TechRadar: “In very broad terms, those using this kind of surveillance technology must have a lawful basis for doing so and should or must, in certain cases, conduct a data protection impact assessment, or risk assessment, to ensure they are aware of and can mitigate the associated risks to other people’s privacy.”

According to Sweetman, this means, legally speaking, that users must tell people that this technology is in use, through clear signage supported by a more detailed privacy notice on their property. Also, that “users must be prepared to respond to people’s questions and requests regarding the uses of their data.” And while there is an exception made in the data protection regulations for purely personal household use, known as the ‘domestic purposes exemption’, its application is, claims Sweetman, limited.

“It is recommended that if a user wishes to rely on the domestic exemption from data protection law, they should ensure that the field of view of the camera does not extend beyond the perimeters of their property,” says Will Richmond-Coggan, Partner and Head of Data and Privacy Disputes at legal firm Freeths. “Where that is not possible, or where the homeowner specifically wishes to keep an eye on their car parked in the road, they should proceed on the basis that they are operating CCTV in a public space and they are therefore potentially to be regarded as a controller of any personal data collected.”

According to Richmond-Coggan, this means ‘doing all the same things that a business would do, including making some clear decisions about what the data is used for, how long (if at all) it is retained and the circumstances in which it might be shared.’ Regarding sharing footage with neighbours to guard against scammers, car thieves and burglars, Richmond-Coggan advises creating a "written data sharing agreement which commits each of them to common standards of safeguarding in relation to the information and how it is used."

Increasing number of complaints to ICO

Regarding ‘accidental spillage’, where footage beyond your property’s boundary is captured, the ICO (Information Commissioner’s Office), which is responsible for enforcing data protection regulations in the UK, offers useful advice for the public in its guidance on home CCTV systems.

“Incidental capture of neighbouring property is not automatically unlawful, but it can be a trigger point,” an ICO spokesperson told TechRadar. “Where cameras record beyond the homeowner’s boundary, the owner should minimise intrusion where possible — for example by adjusting the camera angle or using privacy masking features (on the camera).”

According to its Annual Report for 2025/2026, the ICO received 76,743 data protection complaints in 2025/2026, up from 42,315 in the previous year. “The ICO takes concerns about misuse of personal information seriously whether they relate to organisations or individuals,” said an ICO spokesperson. “We regularly receive and consider complaints about domestic CCTV and smart doorbells.”

However, although the ICO has a range of regulatory powers where data protection law applies, including potentially fining users for a breach, it encourages "people to resolve concerns directly wherever possible".

Posting footage on social media

Whereas CCTV footage from security cameras and video doorbells used to be confined to personal use, the growth of social media has seen an explosion of people uploading footage to platforms such as Facebook, TikTok or local community groups to identify supposedly ‘suspicious figures’.

Doing so, though, carries severe legal hazards, Knights’ Lisa Sweetman advises. “Uploading footage from a video doorbell to social media is not automatically unlawful, but it can raise significant privacy concerns… Ultimately, the fact that someone appears in footage recorded on your property does not give you the right to publish it on social media.”

Warning against the dangers of speculating about someone’s behaviour, Gavin Wilson, Director of Physical Security and Risk at cyber and physical security company Toro Solutions, cautions: “We need to remember a camera only give you part of the picture. It can show you that someone was outside a property at a particular time, but it can’t necessarily tell you who they are, why they were or whether they’ve done anything wrong.” Wilson advises users who think they have "captured criminal activity to keep the original footage and give it to the police, rather than posting it online asking people to identify or accuse the individual."

Not only can uploading video to social media potentially breach data protection laws, you also run the risk of falling foul of other laws too. For example, in the UK under the Defamation Act 2013, you could be sued if footage causes, or is likely to cause, serious harm to a person’s reputation (unless you can prove it is in the public interest) while if the video targets a specific individual, it can cross the line into criminal or civil harassment under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997 — especially if your post encourages followers to track down, abuse, or 'dox' the person featured.

“People should think carefully about uploading footage to social media as it can raise additional data protection and potential considerations around defamation or harassment — particularly if identifiable individuals are shown without consent and the footage is shared beyond personal use,” an ICO spokesperson told TechRadar. “Children’s personal information warrants particular care and protection. Any sharing should have a clear and justifiable reason and should not unnecessarily infringe the privacy rights of those captured.”

Finally, if you record and upload footage of an accident, a crime scene, an ongoing police investigation, or a court trial, your post could severely compromise legal proceedings. For instance, publishing videos of suspects or witnesses online can prejudice a future jury, leading to charges of contempt of court or interfering with the course of justice.

Growth of facial recognition technology and AI

Importantly, when installing home security cameras and video doorbells, homeowners must carefully balance their own security needs with the privacy rights of those around them. As Ali Park, country manager at security camera manufacturer Reolink, points out, "a security camera should be there to protect your home, not to create a permanent record of everyone who happens to pass.”

To help users stay compliant, modern devices incorporate built-in features such as privacy masking and activity zones that allow owners to black out public areas or neighbouring properties. “Most modern cameras allow people to adjust viewing angles, create privacy zones or limit motion detection to specific areas, and I would use those settings wherever possible,” explains Everett Lupton of law firm Slaughter & Lupton. “Audio recording can also raise privacy concerns, so people should understand exactly what their devices record.”

One area that is attracting particular attention right now is the rapid emergence of both facial recognition and AI technologies, not just inside commercial security devices, but increasingly in home devices too. “Considerable care should be used in deploying facial recognition technology in a domestic setting for security,” argues Freeths’ Will Richmond-Coggan. “It involves processing of special category biometric identifiers, and it is unlikely that a domestic user will be able to meet the stringent requirements around such use, particularly where the data is likely to be shared with the third-party provider of the facial recognition technology.”

Given the intrusive nature of facial recognition, Knights’ Lisa Sweetman says a DPIA (Data Protection Impact Assessment) would be required to use facial recognition technology to identify potential criminals. “Using facial recognition simply to identify known burglars will be difficult to justify unless there is a clear and lawful basis for doing so and appropriate safeguards are in place.”

Nor is it just a privacy issue, argues Reolink’s Ali Park. There are also concerns over levels of accuracy. “Facial recognition is still very new and has a few teething issues,” he says. “Because of those exact privacy and accuracy questions, we don’t offer facial recognition in our products.”

Toro Solutions' Gavin Wilson agrees: “Facial recognition can be a useful security aid, but it isn’t proof of identity and people shouldn’t assume that because the security camera has produced a match, it must be correct.”

Regarding artificial intelligence and the rising risk of ‘deep fakes’, it’s important that if CCTV is used in a criminal case that it hasn’t been altered in any way. “There are a number of factors that can help establish authenticity. These include retaining the original recording, preserving metadata such as the date, time and device information, maintaining a clear record of how the footage has been handled and ensuring any copies can be traced to the original source”, says Knights’ Lisa Sweetman. “As the use of AI-generated content becomes more widespread, maintaining an auditable record of where the footage came from, how it has been stored and whether it has been altered is likely to become increasingly important.”

Taking common sense measures

Home security cameras and video doorbells are undeniably invaluable assets for protecting your home, offering vital reassurance against package thieves and intruders. Making sure that you use them properly largely comes down to taking a few precautionary, common-sense measures during set up and use.

For example, when configuring your hardware, rather than letting a lens sweep wide across shared streets or adjacent gardens, use the camera’s built-in tools such as privacy masking to black out areas outside of your property. Users should also remain conscious of recording external audio, while storing footage on local MicroSD cards or hard drives rather than defaulting to external cloud storage is advisable to ensure personal data control.

When it comes to deciding what to do with captured files after an event occurs, it’s best to exercise caution. While capturing film for home security Is lawful, posting identifiable images on social media platforms can cross the line, leaving users exposed to potential legal action. If you must post footage publicly, then it’s best to use technology to blur people’s faces to protect those not involved with an incident – especially children whose personal information demands maximum protection under data protection law.

Ultimately, high-tech security shouldn't feel high-stress. Treat your camera as a targeted perimeter shield rather than a public broadcasting network. Concludes Reolink’s Ali Park: “The most sensible approach is to collect the minimum footage necessary for the safety of you and yours, manage it responsibly and store this footage for as little time as possible.”

Watching the NFL just got cheaper thanks to Best Buy. The retailer is offering a massive 51% discount on NFL Sunday Ticket from YouTube or YouTube TV for Best Buy Plus and Total members.

• Shop more NFL deals at Best Buy

NFL Sunday Ticket gives fans a premium viewing experience, letting you watch every out-of-market Sunday afternoon game. You can also watch four games live at once with Multiview, use the Key Plays view to see what you missed, and track player stats while watching the game.

Keep in mind, you must be a Best Buy Plus or Total member. If you aren't already a member, you can sign up for a membership starting at $29.99 and enjoy perks like free two-day shipping, 24/7 tech support, and AppleCare Plus protection plans with the purchase of an Apple device.

If you also need to upgrade your TV for the 2026 season, Best Buy members can get NFL Sunday Ticket from YouTube or YouTube TV for $234 or NFL RedZone for $276 with the purchase of select TVs. Becoming a Best Buy member is free; just sign up with your email, and you can score free shipping on future purchases.

You'll find Best Buy's NFL Sunday Ticket offer below, which includes up to $246 in savings for Best Buy Plus and Total Members. I've also listed today's top TV deals, which include record-low prices on top-rated big-screen TVs - perfect for watching your favorite NFL team.

Save up to $246 on NFL Sunday Ticket

The best TV deals for watching the NFL

Meta Connect 2026 is fast approaching, and it seems a big surprise hardware announcement has just been leaked — by none other than Meta itself. It’s not much but our first official look at the so-called Project Phoenix has me very excited that we might finally get the Meta Quest Pro successor I’ve been begging for.

The leak was spotted by prolific Meta leaker Luna, who found a never-before-seen headset in the latest Horizon OS prescription lens firmware. Because it only shows how lenses are inserted into the new design, we don’t get a full look at the whole thing, but it seems XR glasses might be a better description than XR headset.

That’s because the front of the headset looks incredibly slim. Not quite Meta Ray-Ban levels, but a fraction of what the Meta Quest 3 and 3S were thickness wise. There also appears to be no head strap. Instead, we see the display unit supported by glasses' stems sitting behind the ears of the wearer.

What this leak seemingly confirms is the rumors that Meta has been working on an ultra-lightweight headset design. One where the battery and a chunk of the processing power are all moved to an external puck — something also teased by a cable we see extending from one of the Meta device’s stems.

Of course we should take all leaks and speculation with a pinch of salt, however considering some details are now coming directly from Meta itself, I suspect this may be a case of where if there’s smoke there’s fire.

If so, I couldn’t be more excited. Following the disappointing start to VR in 2026, this launch might turns things around (at least somewhat).

What I've been waiting for

XR hardware housing its battery in an external puck is nothing new; however, moving processing power in there too is far less common — the only one I’ve experienced is Xreal’s Aura glasses, though it works incredibly well.

By taking as much as possible out of the headset, you can significantly drop the weight of the machine, and, because you’re tethered to something in your pocket, your movement won’t be restricted as it can be when you’re connected to a PC or console.

This makes something capable, comfortable, and somewhat mobile. That said, it seems Phoenix will still be more headset-like than glasses-like, so I’m not sure I see myself exploring the outside world while wearing it.

For gaming and entertainment, there are other specs to consider (such as processing power, display quality, and content support), but where this design wins out is for productivity.

I’ve tried spending entire working weeks immersed in XR and my tests have proven it’s incredibly uncomfortable. It’s fine for a few hours at a time, maybe for the one-off day, but not for eight hours a day five days straight. That’s nightmarish.

But the lightest model I’ve tried is the 545g Samsung Galaxy XR. If Meta’s headset can drop to 200g or less, then it could easily be something I wear for a whole day. Plus it would be super easy to slip into my rucksack to be productive in XR on the go — or kick back with a big-screen movie.

This is precisely why I’ve been wanting an ultra-lightweight XR headset to enter the scene, but so far I’ve been let down. Xreal Aura gets close, but as glasses, it doesn’t boast the same field of view as a headset — with a headset offering more virtual real estate for app windows.

All I need is for Meta’s headset to copy the Xreal Aura's ability to show what’s on my phone screen via a USB-C cable and it could be the perfect XR headset (provided the price isn’t too high).

We’ll have to wait and see what Meta unveils at Connect, but September 23, 2026, can’t come soon enough.

AI voice cloning has reached the point where scammers can convincingly imitate human voices — and worryingly, research suggests we're not particularly good at telling the difference.

Take the case of one X user, for instance, who posted: “Got a call from my wife telling me she forgot her wallet and needed the credit card to pay for her gas.

Except my wife was at home with me, and drives a Tesla. Same voice, bit... off, weird cadence, but 100% sounded just like her. If she wasn't there, and it wasn't about gas I would have fallen for it.

I entertained it for a while to get more out of it, I was so confused. Must be some sort of voice deepfake. The responses were too fast for AI, I think it was a voice filter. I wish I had thought to record it.”

Whether this particular call used generative AI or a real-time voice filter isn't clear. What is clear is that the days when recognizing somebody's voice was enough to prove who was on the other end of the phone are over, and I’m not alone in finding that terrifying.

When news of the story hit Reddit, some people were skeptical about whether this had actually happened, but there were plenty of people with similar stories. “This just happened to me last week,” said one user. “They called aunt and grandmother and said they were an attorney and that I was in jail and needed to be bailed out.”

The ‘relative in distress’ scam

According to the 2026 paper Evaluating AI Models' Capability to Automate Voice Phishing Attacks by Fred Heiding and colleagues, a study involving 4,100 US adults found that up to 36.1% said they would comply with, or were unsure whether they would comply with, an AI-powered “relative in distress” scam.

Importantly, that figure measures self-reported willingness to comply, rather than the number of people who were actually fooled into handing over money. The researchers describe it as a measure of susceptibility to the scam rather than observed behavior.

The researchers also found that persuasiveness mattered more than how human the voice sounded, and that people who regularly used AI weren't any better at identifying synthetic voices than people with no AI exposure.

While the scam of tricking people into thinking their loved ones need money may be an old one, AI is making the danger especially real. If the scammer actually sounds like your loved one, how do you know it’s them?

One answer is to set up a family code word today. It doesn't need to be complicated — just something everybody knows, and that a scammer would be unlikely to guess or discover online.

There’s also an even simpler precaution: hang up and call the person back on a number you already know. If your son, daughter, partner or parent apparently calls out of the blue asking urgently for money, don't rely on the voice sounding right. End the call and contact them yourself.

The Ferrari deepfake case shows why some form of personal verification can work. In 2024, a Ferrari executive received messages followed by a phone call apparently impersonating CEO Benedetto Vigna. Suspicious of the call, the executive asked the supposed Vigna to identify a book the real CEO had recently recommended to him. The caller couldn't answer, and the attempted deception fell apart.

A family code word essentially does the same thing. And it’s something you might have to start thinking about today, if you haven’t already.

Can you trust your own ears?

“AI's deepest impact isn't on our devices; it's on us," says Mark Beare, Head of Consumer at Malwarebytes. "When people can no longer trust what they see, hear, or who they're talking to, the damage reaches far beyond any single scam and into the building blocks of our society.”

A Malwarebytes survey published in June found that 85% of people said it’s hard to tell a scam apart from the real thing, up from 66% the previous year. Perhaps even more tellingly, 88% said it was becoming harder to tell which content online was genuinely human or real.

And that problem isn't restricted to our ears. AI-generated images and deepfake videos are increasingly challenging the assumption that seeing or hearing something for yourself is proof that it really happened.

We used to be able to rely on a familiar voice as proof of identity, but it seems that in 2026 that's no longer enough. AI voice technology is only going to become more convincing, so our behavior needs to change with it.

Agree on a code word with the people closest to you now, and if you get an unexpected call asking for money, hang up and call them back.

Following the recent resignation of one of Anthropic’s leading researchers, multiple AI CEOs have suddenly begun calling for a slowdown in the development of AI technology to allow regulations and governance on the technology to catch up.

Speaking to the BBC after his resignation, Jacob Coxon warned, “I believe that if we don't slow down at the current rate of progress, there is a strong chance that we could all die in the immediate future.”

Following this, Anthropic head Dario Amodei, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, and Grok founder Elon Musk have all apparently aligned in their calls for development to slow down. But there are some tricky waters to navigate - particularly around President Trump, China, and what guardrails should be put into place.

What are AI heads saying?

Over the weekend, Amodei posted an essay on “why the AI industry should slow down”. In it, he said, “I believe that if slowing down bought us even an extra year or two before models reach critical levels of capability, and we used that time to advance alignment, we could greatly reduce the risk that something goes seriously wrong.”

Within the essay, Amodei outlined how AI could be ‘paced’ within the US, and globally, alongside a recommendation that AI companies put ‘evaluator’ teams into place to ensure AI models stay aligned to their tasks. Elon Musk replied to Amodei’s social media post, stating that the Anthropic head was “right”.

Sam Altman told Fortune the regulations and standards for AI further were “not at a place” to continue progressing AI development.

But not everyone is convinced. US President Donald Trump has said that slowing down AI development is non-negotiable, as it would allow China to rapidly catch up to US AI capabilities. He told reporters that the US is “leading China on AI... and, frankly, I want to keep it that way,” adding that “whoever wins AI, wins”.

Trump also said that “very negative forces” were behind the growing opposition to AI, and said that fears were being stoked by “that won’t happen”.

China also isn’t convinced by what the AI giants are saying. Beijing labelled the calls for a slowdown as “fearmongering” from a “Cold War playbook.” In his essay, Amodei said that a “Chinese lead in AI would pose grave danger for the United States and the world.”

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, “Fearmongering, confrontation and malicious competition will only disrupt the process of global AI governance and serve no one’s interests.”

Expert perspectives on calls for AI slowdown

• John Strand, Owner, Black Hills Information Security:

Up until this weekend, I was leaning toward believing that calls for an AI slowdown were purely performative. Then I woke up and read the news today and realized that it almost doesn’t matter.

We can talk about slowing down AI until we’re blue in the face, but when the United States is saying it doesn’t want to slow down because it’s competing with China, and China is aggressively pushing AI development as well, we’re talking about the two major economic and military powers on the planet having enormous incentives to keep moving.

At that point, calls for a slowdown don’t have much bite.

I’d like to believe that Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, and the other frontier model labs are working on better controls. But unless you can get the nation states and the major AI labs moving in the same direction, I don’t see how meaningful restrictions actually work.

This really feels like we’re entering an atomic arms race moment.

Stick with me here.

In 1950, physicist Leó Szilárd publicly discussed the idea of a cobalt bomb, essentially a doomsday weapon that could potentially produce enough radioactive fallout to make the Earth uninhabitable. He wasn’t proposing that somebody build the damn thing. He was trying to demonstrate where the technology could ultimately lead.

That’s the kind of moment I think we’re approaching with AI.

During the nuclear arms race, eventually the consequences became serious enough that competing nations had to at least start talking about limits, controls, and ways to keep competition from ending catastrophically.

I think we’re heading toward a similar problem with AI. Until China, the United States, and the major frontier model labs are all sitting at the same table, restrictions adopted by individual companies or individual countries are going to have a very difficult time holding.

Someone slowing down only works if they believe the other guy is going to slow down too.

• Ryan McCurdy, VP, Liquibase:

Slowing frontier development may give AI companies more time to understand and address the risks Amodei is describing. But enterprises can’t build their AI strategy around the assumption that AI is going to slow down.

AI is already moving from generating content and code to taking action across software delivery and production systems. The question for enterprises is how they adopt that capability without giving up control.

That means putting governance where AI decisions become real actions. Organizations need to define what an agent can access, what it can change, what it can decide on its own, and what policies have to be met before a change reaches a critical system. Those controls need to work whether the action comes from a developer, automation, or an AI agent.

We can debate how quickly the frontier should move. Enterprises still have to prepare for where it’s going.

• Tristan Watkins, director of services innovation, Advania UK:

Until recently, the major AI labs have been reluctant to slow their development efforts unilaterally. Over the last week this changed, with new commitments from OpenAI and Anthropic to prioritise AI alignment and interpretability research, to become more externally verifiable, and to establish safety precedents that governments could adapt.

Given that these two organisations already allocate far more on AI Safety than their competitors, this bilateral leadership is extremely welcome.

It appears that other US labs may follow suit, but given the differences in AI Safety spending outside of Anthropic and OpenAI today, this will require investment more than lip service. Hopefully this underscores why we need governments to lead these efforts more proactively.

• Oleksandr Yaremchuk, CTO and Co-Founder, Manifold Security:

Pacing the frontier is the right conversation to be having, but it cannot become a substitute for securing the AI we have already put into the world. The uncomfortable reality is that we are debating how to quickly build more powerful agents while struggling to control the ones already operating with real credentials, real access and real-world consequences.

The incidents behind this debate make that clear. The Hugging Face attack was not just a failure of model alignment. Agents ran for days through an unmonitored system, with credentials that had not been rotated, and the victim spotted the activity before the people running the agents did. The problem wasn't simply what the model was capable of. It was that nobody was watching closely enough when it acted.

A fitting analogy is with hazardous materials. We don't just wait for them to become more dangerous before deciding how they should be handled. We control their custody, monitor where they go, limit who can access them and establish clear accountability when something goes wrong. AI agents need the same thinking.

Independent evaluation of frontier models is important. But if an agent can act autonomously on your systems today, you should already be able to answer three basic questions: what did it do, what did it have access to, and could you have stopped it? If you don't know what it did or what it could access, you can't know whether you could have stopped it. Slowing down the next generation won't solve the problem you have right now.

• Heath Mullins, Chief Evangelist, ExtraHop:

AI leaders calling for a slowdown is confirming what the security industry has already been living through firsthand. This isn't a hypothetical risk, it's the threat landscape we're defending against right now.

While it is concerning to see the pace of innovation behind these AI models, the real challenge is that organizations haven't had the runway to build the infrastructure to defend against machine-speed threats.

Calls for caution surrounding the speed of AI development buys the security industry time to get proper visibility into AI activity.

Understanding AI activity within an organization is critical as we’ve seen models break out of sandboxes despite governance built into those models. Every organization will be relying on AI agents for machine-speed defense, and they need their own governance over how these models and agents operate inside their environment, starting with independent evidence of what they actually do, what they access, where they move data, what systems they talk to, and what actions they take.

You can't govern AI based on what a model is designed or permitted to do. Instead, you need real-time evidence of what models and agents are actually doing, because the gap between exponentially more capable AI and defenders' ability to see it is exactly where the next incident happens.

• Bri Frost, Director of Product Management, Cloud Range:

The answer is not necessarily to stop AI innovation but, we need to stop pretending innovation and security are advancing at the same speed.

When ChatGPT became publicly available in 2022, the models were dramatically less capable than they are today — and the guardrails were very easy to manipulate. The difference is that the models behind those guardrails are no longer the models of 2022. They can reason better, write and debug code. They can operate as agents. They can collaborate! And increasingly, they can interact and affect real infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the model release cycle has gone from feeling like major capability jumps every year or two to seemingly every few weeks. That creates a dangerous asymmetry: AI capability is compounding faster than security.

Security and innovation have always been in conflict with each other. If every security problem had to be solved before we innovated, we’d never ship anything. But the opposite extreme is just as reckless: accelerating capability while just assuming we’ll bolt the security controls on afterward and they’ll be effective.

Every new release of AI capability expands the attack surface exponentially. Give a vulnerable model better reasoning, then tool access, then memory, then autonomy, then connectivity to production systems, and yesterday’s jailbreak isn’t just a clever prompt anymore — it’s an execution path. That’s the snowball effect we should be worried about.

Responsibility also must lie with the AI companies. If a SaaS company knowingly shipped software with weak security controls and customers were harmed, we wouldn’t excuse it because they were 'innovating quickly'.

So why are we treating AI differently?

You don’t get to race to build increasingly powerful, autonomous systems, profit from them, and then shrug when predictable security failures cause damage.

Sure the argument can be made that no product is perfectly secure - That’s not the standard. But if you ship the product, you inherit responsibility for securing it. And continuing to secure it better!

The conversation shouldn’t simply be “Should we slow AI down?”

It should be: Can our ability to test, validate, contain and secure AI keep pace with our ability to make it more powerful? Is there an equivocal kill switch?

Right now, the answer is no.

And if we’re going to keep accelerating — which I believe we will — then independent testing, adversarial evaluation, isolated testing environments, containment, continuous validation and security-by-design can’t remain optional steps we add after the innovation happens.

The faster we build the engine, the more important the brakes become.

• Denis Calderone, CTO, Suzu Labs:

Amodei's diagnosis is the most honest thing a frontier lab CEO has said publicly. The agent risk is real, recursive self-improvement is accelerating, and the competitive pressure is making both worse.

Where I get skeptical is the prescription. Democratic coordination among companies in a commercial race? Global pacing agreements with China? Amodei himself rates the hardest steps as unlikely. No lab has named a single model release they'll delay because of this essay.

The one idea worth holding the industry to is embedded evaluators with independent publication rights. Give third-party safety researchers permanent access inside the labs, comparable to what bank examiners have inside banks, and let them publish what they find without the company controlling the narrative. That's a simple, concrete accountability mechanism. It doesn't require global coordination or antitrust waivers. Anthropic says they're committing to it unilaterally. Good. Now make the rest of the industry match.

• Donald McFarlane, Board Member, Xcape Inc:

AI does not develop an agenda; its operators do. When we give an autonomous system powerful access and ability to act at machine speed, they will continue to prove highly capable.

Rules enacted in the name of safety must not become a moat against competition or progress. Enormous compliance costs may be manageable for the handful of companies already spending billions building frontier models, while becoming a substantial barrier to everyone behind them.

Government can help clarify accountability and duties of care, and facilitate strong information sharing and collective defense, which is an area where we sorely need more effective public-private partnerships.

But safeguards should focus on how these systems are used and deployed, rather than deciding who is allowed to build powerful AI in the first place.

The goal should be safer deployment without pulling up the drawbridge on innovation.

• Amazon is still selling fake 'energy-saving' plugs despite having pledged to remove them
• Which? first spotted them in 2025, and Amazon said they had been removed
• The retailer promised to remove them for a second time in August, but they're still available to purchase

Fake ‘energy-saving’ plugs are one of the biggest tech scams, and they’re still being sold on Amazon even though the retailer promised MPs it would remove the product listings.

Liberal Democrat MP Joshua Reynolds highlighted the dangers of the plugs — which can pose a fire risk — during a hearing back in June, calling for the retailer to take accountability.

In August, Amazon’s UK Director of Public Policy, Monica Ariño, issued a letter to the House of Commons Business and Trade Select Committee saying the devices had been removed from sale, adding that there was "a technical issue in [our] automated classification system that was preventing some of these products from being proactively detected".

This isn’t the first time Amazon has promised to remove fake plugs. Back in 2025, Which? first spotted these ‘energy-saving’ plugs and approached retailers with their findings, resulting in their removal from stores. However, identical products were found on Amazon just weeks later.

Despite Amazon's most recent pledge to remove the plugs from sale, they're still available to purchase from the retailer. We’ve checked Amazon UK’s page and found that these products are still live — the Telegraph (£) has also spotted similar listings.

Now, Reynolds says he’ll be writing to Amazon asking for an explanation, adding that "Amazon has got some proper questions they have to answer. These are exactly the same products tested by Which?". He also claims that these plugs are appearing as sponsored ads at the top of Amazon’s listing pages.

As mentioned, these devices were first spotted during a test carried out by Which?, for where it tested eight devices from sites including eBay, AliExpress, Shein, and TikTok Shop. It found no evidence that the plugs actually worked, and noted that it would be illegal to sell them in the UK, as they didn't meet basic safety standards.

So how are these plugs claimed to cut your energy bills? Based on the product listings we’ve found, Amazon’s ‘energy-saving’ plugs are advertised as ‘voltage stabilizers’ and ‘surge protectors’, and are claimed to significantly cut your energy bills by optimizing the performance of your household appliances.

At a time when energy bills are increasing, it’s an easy sales pitch to make, and they’re also affordably priced (usually around the £10-£15 mark), making them seem to be a worthwhile puchase.

However, it's claimed that the devices are a fire hazard, and also pose an electrocution risk. According to the tests conducted by Which?, more than half of the plugs’ socket pins were either too small, not straight, or were so frail they just snapped off.

Other tests found that some of the plugs failed to meet basic safety measures due to poor manufacturing, including non-standard capacitors and soldering.

Amazon hasn't yet commented on the current status of these product listings, or responded to the latest claims. We've asked the company for a comment, and will update this story if we get a response.

• Revolut fell for a spoofed government email scam, leaking sensitive customer data to attackers
• Compromised info includes IDs, selfies, account statements, IBANs, and full transaction histories
• Criminals now allegedly leaking data on Telegram, demanding 10,000 BTC (~$780M) ransom from Revolut

Digital banking platform Revolut was tricked into giving away a treasure trove of sensitive customer data to hackers, and it is now coming back to bite it.

The company told TechCrunch that it recently fell victim to a “sophisticated external impersonation scam” in which the threat actor “utilized a legitimate government agency domain email to submit fraudulent requests for information”.

In other words, the attackers either broke into, or spoofed, an email address belonging to the police, tax authorities, or other government bodies with statutory powers to demand information, and used them to demand Revolut hand over sensitive customer data.

Demanding ransom

Cybernews reports that the compromised data includes customers’ birth dates, postal and email addresses, occupation, phone numbers, and copies of identity documents. TechCrunch added that verification selfies, account statements, and transaction histories may have also been compromised, together with IBANs, withdrawal records, complete transaction histories, and Bitcoin transactions.

Should these reports be confirmed, this will be a bonafide fiasco for Revolut.

"Upon detection, ⁠we immediately blocked the address and ​alerted the relevant government agency as ​well as enforcement agencies, data protection, and financial regulators," a company spokesperson told Reuters over the weekend.

So far, we don’t know exactly how many people are affected. Revolut said it is a “very limited” number, and that all of them had been notified already.

According to Coin Bureau, the criminals have started leaking sensitive data on Telegram, in a bid to pressure Revolut into paying a ransom demand. The publication shared screenshots of the threat actors apparently leaking a selfie and “full KYC” of a CEO of a crypto casino website, saying that the crooks are now demanding 10,000 BTC in exchange for deleting the data.

This would put the ransom demand at approximately $780 million which is obscene even by criminal standards.

"This one is deeply concerning and the implications for affected customers go well beyond a standard data breach notification," said Muhammad Yahya Patel, vCISO & Cybersecurity Advisor at Huntress. "Passports, driver's licenses, verification selfies, account statements, transaction histories, birth dates, addresses that's not a data leak, that's a complete identity theft kit handed to whoever sent those fraudulent requests."

"Every single component needed to impersonate someone, open accounts in their name, or bypass checks at other financial institutions is in that package. On the dark web, that kind of profile doesn't sell as individual records it sells as a ready-made fraud pack, and it commands a significant premium precisely because of its completeness."

"For a fintech built on digital identity verification, the bar for verifying third-party data requests should be exceptionally high. The question isn't why an attacker tried this. It's why a regulated financial institution handling highly sensitive data didn't have sufficiently rigorous verification controls to catch it," Patel concluded.

Via Cybernews

• Highly exposed occupations are seeing less wage growth due to AI productivity gains
• 5.8 million US workers are considered to be working in these roles
• The impacts could lead to reduced living standards

While sceptics have been warning of mass layoffs for years, a new report reveals that AI could actually be leading to weaker wage growth instead of human replacement.

US wage growth is already slowing compared with inflation, and a new study by Apollo Global Management has proposed that AI could be to blame.

According to the data, real wage growth in highly exposed occupations has been around 6.7 percentage points lower than less-exposed occupations since 2023, while employment itself is largely no different.

What are the real implications of AI on jobs?

The white paper estimates that 5.8 million US workers, or around 3.7% of the US labor force, works in highly exposed jobs, and this is on the basis of earlier Anthropic work whereby at least half of the job's tasks can be replaced by Anthropic's AI tools.

"Companies are capturing AI productivity gains through wage compression rather than workforce reduction," Chief Economist Torsten Slok suggested. In other words, workers are getting more work done thanks to AI, so demand for additional labor has fallen and workers' bargaining powers have weakened.

Apollo estimates the effects of this could translate to around $28 billion in lost annual labor income, but this could be on the conservative side.

Crucially, Apollo's analysis shows that AI is more likely to be affecting the price of labor rather than the quantity of labor as human-AI hybrid workforces become more common.

Looking ahead, Apollo is warning that "profound implications for income inequality and living standards" could threaten workers globally.

While the research doesn't offer specific remedies, it does point toward government involvement and policymaking in order to slow down how quickly the transition happens and to offer greater support to impacted workers.

The Bambu Lab H2S is one of the largest and fastest enclosed 3D printers we've ever tested, and now it's got a very welcome discount in the Bambu lab 3D printer sale.

• Best for: Enthusiasts, engineers, and ecommerce businesses who need speedy 3D printers for larger- and higher-volume production.

• The deal: The Bambu Lab H2S AMS Combo 3D printer is down to $1399 (was $1500) at Bambu Lab. In the UK, the H2S is now £1099 (was £1199).

• Why it matters: We scored the Bambu Lab H2S 4.5 stars and awarded it a TechRadar Pro Recommends badge for easy setup, high speeds, and incredible accuracy. This CoreXY 3D printer has a large 340 x 320 x 340mm build volume, 350°C nozzle with 65°C active chamber heating, and 23-sensor AI-driven monitoring. In our final verdict, we found "the test prints that came out of this machine were some of the cleanest I've seen, and at this scale and consistency, it's really difficult to match with any other model."

• The catch: This deal is for the AMS Combo, unlocking multi-color printing out of the box. While the standalone 3D printer is also on sale for a cheaper price, you'll need to get the AMS accessory later if you want multi-color 3D printing.

Why we recommend it

Expert verdict

Our 3D printing expert Alastair was seriously impressed with the H2S during his 4.5 star review, saying "the H2S is impressive, and the single-nozzle hotend is highly tuned for precision and quality."

Benchmark quality

Accuracy is especially good, with Alastair noting: "One of the big points I would highlight while using this printer was not only the speed and scale, but also the quality of the surface finish. Surfaces were exceptionally smooth, and when I printed the Autodesk Kickstarter test model I've been using for many years, it was almost a full 30 out of 30."

Scale & speed

The build volume stands out. At 340 x 320 x 340mm, it is significantly larger than Bambu Lab's X1 Carbon, and the enclosed, heated chamber means it can handle engineering-grade filaments like ABS and nylon that need stable temperatures to print reliably. Combined with a toolhead speed up to 1000mm/s, this printer is built for people producing parts in volume, not just occasional hobby prints.

Features

The 23-sensor monitoring system is a meaningful reliability feature - the filament detection, for example, worked incredibly well during testing. This deal also includes the AMS Combo, letting you run multi-color models as soon as you're set up.

Price Context & Historical Value

What makes it worth flagging is that $1,399 for a printer with this build volume, this print speed, and a heated chamber remains a strong price relative to enclosed printers with comparable specs from other brands, several of which cost noticeably more for a smaller build area.

Should you buy it?

✅ Buy the Bambu Lab H2S AMS Combo if...

You want one of the largest build volumes available in an enclosed printer at this price, you print in engineering materials like ABS or nylon that need a heated chamber, or you need high-speed 3D printing for production.

❌ Skip the Bambu Lab H2S AMS Combo if...

You're a beginner or hobbyist (it's pricey for more casual users), or you're happy with single-color printing. If you don't need multi-color get the standalone model without the AMS Combo, as you can always upgrade later.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

This is a single-nozzle printer, so multicolor and multimaterial printing is slower and generates more waste than on Bambu Lab's dual-nozzle H2D models.

While setup and use is straightforward if you're familiar with 3D printers, there is a learning curve for anyone trying to push the printer's fastest custom speed settings, and it takes up significant desk space given its size.

This is a printer built for design studios, small businesses, and serious engineering hobbyists, not casual weekend printing.

• See all 3D printers at Bambu Lab

Over the last decade, digital identity has primarily been linked with the internet security industry.

Businesses have been focusing heavily on fraud prevention, profile authentication and compliance measures, all designed to answer a relatively simple question - is this person who they claim to be?

But as AI transforms how consumers discover, engage and purchase from brands, digital identity has become something much more integral for businesses across the board.

It has become a critical layer of business infrastructure, one that sits at the intersection of trust, experience, personalization and growth.

Ultimately, the businesses that understand this shift, will be better positioned to compete in an increasingly automated digital world.

And those that don’t, are likely to find themselves struggling to build trust, protect margins and maintain direct relationships with their customer base.

Proving Authenticity in a Complex AI Era

When we take a glance back, the internet was never designed with robust identity systems in mind. For decades, businesses relied heavily on a combination of usernames, passwords, email addresses and manual verification processes to establish trust online.

Whilst imperfect, and at times vastly time consuming, these processes were efficient in an era of human driven interactions. However, in the world of AI, this is no longer the case.

Artificial intelligence is dramatically lowering the barriers to creating fake accounts, synthetic identities and automated purchasing behavior. At the same time, consumers are becoming more conscious of how their personal information is collected, stored and used.

This creates a difficult balancing act for businesses. They need greater confidence that customers are genuine, while customers expect less friction and stronger privacy protections.

The traditional response has often been to collect more information. Yet in many cases, more data creates more risk. Every additional piece of personal information collected becomes another asset that must be protected, governed and justified.

As cyber threats increase and regulatory scrutiny grows, businesses are beginning to recognize that the future of identity may not be about collecting more data, but about collecting less.

The Future of Verification: Privacy by Design

One of the most important shifts happening within digital identity is the move away from document-heavy verification models towards trusted verification networks. Rather than asking users to repeatedly upload sensitive documents or provide excessive personal information, businesses can increasingly verify eligibility or identity through trusted institutional sources.

This approach delivers benefits for both organizations and consumers. For businesses, it reduces the operational and security burden associated with storing personally identifiable information. For consumers, it creates a faster, less intrusive experience. The key principle is simple: verify only what is necessary.

If a retailer needs to confirm that someone is a student, for example, they don't necessarily need access to every piece of information contained within a university record. They simply need confidence that the individual meets the criteria required to access a student offer. This is where audience verification platforms are becoming increasingly valuable.

In practice, this tends to happen in one of two ways. Sometimes verification works through a secure database lookup, where an individual's eligibility is checked against records already held by a relevant institution, such as an enrolment system, without the retailer ever seeing the underlying record itself, only a confirmation of status.

In other cases, it works through a trusted single-sign-on style login, where the individual authenticates directly with their own institution and that institution simply confirms their status back to the retailer, again without exposing any personal data to either party.

What both approaches have in common is that they lean on relationships of trust that already exist, rather than asking the consumer to prove who they are all over again.

The result is a more efficient exchange of trust between brands and consumers. In many ways, this reflects a broader evolution in digital identity. The goal is no longer to know everything about a user. The goal is to know enough to establish trust and ultimately, these notions of trust, are quickly becoming an ever-growing business growth strategy.

Trust has become a differentiator

Consumers are only becoming more demanding as they increasingly expect personalized experiences, relevant offers and seamless interactions. Yet, they also want transparency, control and confidence that their information is being handled responsibly. The brands that successfully balance these expectations gain more than compliance benefits. They build stronger customer relationships. Audience verification offers a useful example of this dynamic.

For a student, the value proposition is straightforward. They want access to relevant discounts and offers from brands they trust. The verification process itself is largely invisible, provided it is fast and frictionless. For the brand, however, the stakes are higher. Verification helps ensure promotional budgets reach the intended audience, protects against misuse and enables more effective customer acquisition.

Both sides benefit from a trusted exchange of value. This is why digital identity management should no longer be viewed purely through the lens of security teams. It has become a strategic capability that influences marketing effectiveness, customer acquisition, loyalty and brand trust.

Preparing for an AI-driven future

The rise of AI introduces another important dimension to the identity conversation. As large language models (LLMs) and AI assistants increasingly shape how consumers discover products and services, businesses face a new challenge: maintaining trusted, direct relationships with their audiences.

In the future, many interactions may occur through AI-powered intermediaries rather than traditional websites or apps. Discovery, recommendation and even purchasing decisions could increasingly be influenced by intelligent systems acting on behalf of consumers. In that environment, trusted audience data and verified customer relationships become even more valuable.

Through such technology, businesses can confidently identify and understand their audiences and will be better equipped to personalize experiences, deliver relevant recommendations and maintain authenticity across increasingly fragmented digital ecosystems.

Those that rely solely on broad marketing reach may find themselves losing visibility as AI-driven discovery mechanisms become more influential. The organizations that thrive will be those that treat digital identity not as a compliance requirement but as a foundational capability underpinning trust, personalization and growth.

From Identity Verification to Trust Infrastructure

The next chapter of digital commerce will be defined by trust. Not trust built through lengthy forms, excessive data collection or intrusive verification processes. Trust built through intelligent, privacy-conscious systems that enable businesses to verify what matters while respecting consumer expectations.

Digital identity is no longer simply about proving who someone is. It is about enabling secure, trusted and meaningful relationships between businesses and the people they serve. As AI continues to reshape commerce, organizations that invest in modern verification frameworks and data-minimization integrations will be better positioned to navigate the changes ahead.

Ultimately, the future belongs to businesses that can answer a simple but increasingly important question: how do you establish trust without creating friction? And clearly… digital identity is a strong bet.

We've listed the 8 best ecommerce platforms.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

.com has long been established as the undisputed top dog when it comes to domains. Yet in 2026, a clear shift is underway in how brands select Top-Level Domains (TLDs) – with the likes of .ai, .io, and .store all seeing elevated rates of adoption.

These trends became transparent in Wix's study of domain registration trends in 2026. So, I spoke with Inbal Geva, Product Lead and GM at Wix Domains, to dive a little deeper into how TLD selection is starting to change and how businesses can make the most of this opportunity.

The study shows that .store websites drive 10% more sales than .com - why do you think that is?

One possibility is that this domain extension tells site visitors exactly what they are getting from the site (a store), which could mean more qualified shoppers are visiting the site. It also implies that the store owner is very clear about what they are selling on their site.

It also shows that .org websites are 34% more likely to drive ecommerce revenue than .com websites. What does the data tell us about why this might be?

The data shows an interesting correlation, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that the .org extension itself drives more ecommerce revenue.

.org is commonly associated with established organizations, nonprofits, and mission-driven businesses, which may have stronger communities and more engaged audiences. That could contribute to higher ecommerce activity.

So rather than attributing the difference to the extension itself, we see it as an indication that the types of organizations using .org — and the audiences they attract — may behave differently online.

.store, .online, and .shop registrations doubled in five months; does this highlight a shift in how businesses want to be represented online? Or is it more likely to reflect supply and affordability issues with .com domains?

So far, our data and the suggestion tests we’ve run consistently show that users still strongly prefer established TLDs, especially .com. So I wouldn’t conclude from the growth of .store, .online, and .shop that users now prefer changing the extension over adjusting the domain name.

What’s more interesting is that we’re seeing growing adoption of alternative TLDs, but .com remains the clear first choice. The growth of specific extensions can be driven by several factors — better availability of desirable names, pricing and promotions, increased visibility and distribution, and stronger marketing by the registries themselves.

Is .com still the default TLD? Or does it face a threat from others?

.com is still the default.

People clearly prefer a .com domain when their brand name is available. Many users will still make a small adjustment to the domain name in order to keep .com, so I wouldn’t say it’s under threat. But alternative TLDs can still be appealing if your ideal .com is already registered. We also see people having fun with extensions like .yoga for yoga studios, .bar for a bar, and so on.

.ai increased by +20% from January to May 2026, and .io increased by a massive 32x in May 2026. Are these increases tied to a specific batch of business or product launches, or does it signal a more generic rise in these tech-associated TLDs?

We’ve seen more interest in tech and AI-driven extensions. Wix’s States of Website report showed that creators aren't treating their domains as an afterthought, but rather as a decision that is made early on in the process.

They're committing to them faster, which implies that they are taking choosing a domain name seriously. These TLDs immediately signal what the brand is about before you even get to the website.

How does the use of TLDs like .shop, .io, .ai, and .online impact a website's ability to perform well in SEO, AEO, and GEO?

Certain industries congregate around certain TLDs.

Tech uses .io, and AI founders use .ai. This means that the TLD can act as an additional contextual signal for LLMs that are looking for answers on niche topics. From an SEO point of view, this can also mean that users are more likely to click through to sites where the domain matches their intent. All of this is great for growth and visibility.

Wix analyzed almost a million domain registrations. What trend or statistic did you find most surprising?

Historically, .com alternatives were sometimes seen as second best. But our data shows that .com alternatives can still perform well for businesses.

eCommerce sites with a .store extension earn 10% more revenue than sites with a .com extension. This doesn’t mean .com is bad—again, it’s still the default—but it means alternative extensions could be worth considering.

After a less-than-enthusiastic response to 2023's 360 Vis Nav, Dyson got the wheels rolling on its return to the robot vacuum market last year with its Spot+Scrub Ai. Now it seems momentum is building: this September the brand unveiled not one, but three new bots that would be joining the lineup.

There's the flagship R3 Nurovi Spot+Scrub UV — a successor to the Spot+Scrub Ai — alongside the R2 Nurovi Wash+Dry, and the R1 Nurovi Dry. I got a peek at all three at Dyson's IFA-adjacent launch event earlier in the month, and was intrigued to see some unique new features.

To get the inside scoop, I caught up with Nathan Lawson Mclean, a Dyson senior design manager who works across the brand's home products. Here are the five most surprising things I learned about the new Nurovi robot vacuum range...

1. Triangle mops have been in Dyson's invention cupboard for years

The R2 Nurovi Wash+Dry has a rather unusual mopping setup. Instead of two circular discs, it uses a pair of rounded 'Reuleaux' triangles. These rotate 'eccentrically' — that is, the point of rotation isn't central. The pads move like a rotary engine, or a Spirograph, depending on your preferred analogy. The benefit is the shape can get much closer into corners.

What's interesting is that this design has been in Dyson's back pocket for a while now, just waiting to be added to a suitable product.

"These have always been in development," says Lawson Mclean. "I remember the first Reuleaux pads — those were initially developed back in 2019. We put it on the front of a brush bar in a cleaner just to try and get into corners. And what it ended up doing, you can imagine, [it was] a bit like riding a bicycle with square wheels. It caused too much ricocheting."

This is apparently not an unusual scenario at Dyson. "We're actually always developing these technologies in tandem," he continues. "It's just about what's the right timing; the platform that we're able to integrate it on. You'll see that we're starting to get to the point where we're packing [new products] full of our unique Dyson technologies."

2. Not everyone wanted the side sweepers

All three of the new Nurovi robovacs have distinctive side sweepers. They feature a design that Lawson Mclean calls 'origami-inspired', but to me, looks more like a fish's fin. Apparently, the brand founder wasn't a fan originally.

"Side sweepers were always a bit of a faux pas with James Dyson," reveals Lawson Mclean. "He hated them. He thought they scattered dirt everywhere." For that reason, the brand's early models didn't have side sweepers at all — the 360 Vis Nav had a side duct that poked out when the bot sensed it was near the edge of a room.

"Side sweepers are fantastic. They are just a little chaotic. They also tend to wear out," continues Lawson Mclean. "More importantly, in James' eyes, they [end up getting] wrapped and covered in hair, which is a bit gross."

For the Nurovi, the Dyson engineers reimagined the traditional sweeper style to solve these issues, using "some of the advanced geometry" from the brand's conical cleaner heads found on the likes of the Dyson V16.

"It kind of has this really interesting over-molded pattern… that holds the nylon bristles at a very specific angle on the floor, helping us to avoid scattering this dust around, and corral things in a more controlled manner. It also stops hair wrapping around it so readily, too," says Lawson Mclean. "So it's a small, simple, effective, quality of life improvement."

3. UV will light up spills 'like a bowling alley'

The big, flashy upgrade found on the flagship R3 Nurovi Spot+Scrub UV is… well, UV. A UV light mounted onto the bot will highlight dried-on, invisible substances, ranging from sugary drinks to milk, tonic water and sparkling water. The R3 will then 'scrub' back and forth over the area to clear the mess before it gets sticky, or starts to smell.

"As the robot's running around your home on its mission, it will now expose these totally invisible stains that become breeding grounds for bacteria," explains Lawson Mclean. "You'd be surprised what fluoresces — a bit like a bowling alley in your own home.

4. The R1 is for those who don't trust robo-mops

It's increasingly rare to see a vacuum-only robot vac on the market these days, but Dyson has included one in its new lineup: the R1 Nurovi Dry. There were a multitude of reasons for this bot to exist, says Lawson Mclean. It's great for people who don't have have hard flooring in their home, or are looking for a more affordable option, or simply want to avoid — as he puts it — "a great big bloody dock like some robots have".

But it's also designed as an option for those who are wary of robo-mops. "There are many people who — I know for a fact, through user trials — don't trust robotic vacuums with their carpets. You know… we've ruined many of James' Persian rugs over the years," he recalls, presumably referring to brand founder James Dyson. "[It's] perhaps even a bit of an entry gateway to robotic vacuums, converting those people that don't really see the value of wet and dry robots just yet."

5. One major update has nothing to do with the design

There are plenty of interesting design features, but it might turn out that one of the most significant upgrades is nothing to do with the robot itself at all. "I think when we talk about, 'Why are people not using this fantastic technology?', there's a lot of barriers. There are, just really pragmatically," says Lawson Mclean. "Even, I think, with people [in their 30s], they go, yeah, I don't really understand it, I don't really know what the setup is like."

Dyson's response has been to set up a 'white glove' onboarding service, which takes the form of an actual human who will, via video call, walk you through the setup process. That includes everything from unboxing and connecting the bot to mapping your home properly.

It's part of the new 'Dyson Concierge' service, and it's free with your purchase. (At time of writing, the service is being advertised on Dyson US, but not yet on the UK or Australian sites — I'm confirming if and when it'll be available in these territories.)

"When we started doing it, we just saw this huge uplift," recalls Lawson Mclean. "It wasn't a problem with the robots. It was just a problem with people having poor maps to begin with because perhaps they left a door closed, you know?"

Take a look at the full Dyson robovac range

Below you can see the Dyson robot vacuums currently available in your country.

Note: the R3 Spot+Scrub UV is not yet available to buy. In the US, it was meant to launch exclusively at CostCo in early September, but at time of writing (14 Sept) is hasn't arrived yet. It's due to arrive in the UK and Australia in 'early 2027'.

Corsair's Vengeance RBG memory has consistently impressed us in use, and with the on-going memory crisis sending prices sky-rocketing, we're constantly on the look-out for discounts on its speedy DDR5 RAM. And we've found on on the the white 32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5-6000 kit over at Newegg.

• Best for: PC builders and gamers who want 32GB of fast DDR5 memory for a compatible Intel system.

• The deal: The white Corsair Vengeance RGB 32GB DDR5-6000 kit is $480 (was $500) at Newegg when you use code GGUF239

• Why it matters: You get two 16GB DDR5-6000 modules with CL36-44-44-96 timings, Intel XMP 3.0 support and onboard voltage regulation. Each module also has ten individually addressable RGB LEDs that you can customize through Corsair iCUE.

• The catch: You'll need a DDR5-compatible motherboard, with Corsair recommending Intel 600 and 700 series models. You'll also typically need to enable XMP in the BIOS to reach the advertised speed.

Also consider

Why we recommend it

A 32GB dual-channel kit provides plenty of memory for a modern PC, giving you room for demanding multitasking, content creation and other memory-intensive applications. The DDR5-6000 speed provides a good balance between bandwidth and compatibility, and Intel XMP 3.0 support makes it easier to run the memory at its advertised settings without manually tweaking values in the BIOS.

Price context & historical value

Newegg currently lists the 32GB kit at $499.99, with promo code GGUF239 reducing the checkout price by $20 to $479.99. The current $479.99 price isn't the lowest we've seen for this exact kit however. It was $439.99 last autumn.

RAM prices can vary considerably right now, so the value here depends heavily on wanting this particular white RGB configuration rather than simply looking for the cheapest 32GB DDR5 kit.

Should you buy it?

✅ Buy the Corsair Vengeance RGB if...

You're building or upgrading a DDR5 Intel PC and want 32GB of fast memory that also looks good. DDR5-6000, XMP 3.0 and customizable RGB lighting make it particularly appealing for a build with a windowed case.

❌ Skip the Corsair Vengeance RGB if...

You're primarily interested in getting 32GB of DDR5 memory for the lowest possible price. You're paying extra for the white heat spreaders, RGB lighting and Corsair ecosystem.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

This is DDR5 memory, so it won't work in a motherboard that only accepts DDR4. Corsair specifically recommends the kit for compatible Intel platforms, including Intel 600 and 700 series motherboards.

The advertised DDR5-6000 specification also relies on an XMP performance profile, so won't necessarily run at that speed straight after installation. Its CL36-44-44-96 timings operate at 1.40V, so you'll need to enable the appropriate XMP profile in your BIOS to get the best settings.

• Shop all RAM at Newegg

• Krafton announced PUBG: Dednet at Gamescom this year
• The '90s-inspired shooter features some bonkers abilities
• "We're kind of finding our own way here," explains game director Dave Curd

Players slithering along the ground like snakes, swords for hands, a tiny doll wielding a power drill driving in a toy car — some of these wild sights seen in the debut trailer for PUBG: Dednet seem completely at odds with the realistic and reserved approach the defining battle royale series is known for. When I bring this up to the game's creative director, Dave Curd, he tells me that is entirely the point.

"If you want to excite and delight people, you have to give them something fresh," he says me in an interview at Gamescom. "If you want a cool, stoic, mil-sim, take your pick; they're everywhere. But what everyone else can't do, and maybe they don't want to, is my take on this world, this lore, these characters, these abilities."

Curd explains that the tone of PUBG: Dednet is like "my version of the 90s filtered through a meatgrinder," and you can certainly see that from the debut trailer. It's zany, over-the-top, and drenched in color, with gunfights taking place in arcades, car chases through rural towns lit up by neon signs, and a grungy, punk vibe throughout. Safe to say, it stands out.

"The audience will forgive almost anything but being bored," suggests Curd. "So, I think this trailer will get a lot of love and hate.

"As long as they're feeling something passionately, I think we've done a good job," he continues. "But if people look past that and their eyes glaze over, then that would be worrying."

While Dednet is still effectively a battle royale, pitting multiple teams of three against each other in a contest to be the last ones standing, it continues to mix things up not just in the tone and character abilities, but also in how your game progresses over time with several roguelite elements.

It starts with the concept of runs, where you might nominate how many wins or placements you can achieve before you hit a certain number of losses. Win or lose, at the end of a match, you're presented with choices that can alter or upgrade your chosen character's abilities and play style.

Perhaps you'll lean into more of a support role to assist your teammates with heals or protection with a riot shield made out of a car door? Or maybe you'll take that aforementioned doll, who can ride on your back into battle or stealthily sit on your opponent's shoulder and be a nuisance.

"I'm pretty confident this isn't going to be in this year's Battlefield update," jokes Curd, when explaining how they came up with abilities like this for the multiplayer shooter. "I think our internal test is: does it make us laugh? Does it sound like an interesting challenge? And do we think about it the next day? We're kind of finding our own way here."

That neatly summarises how Dave Curd and the team are experimenting for PUBG: Dednet to create something unique and interesting in the space. It definitely caught my eye during this year's Gamescom, and if it got your attention too, you can pre-register for the closed beta now.

Today's the day when Apple starts rolling out iOS 27 to millions of iPhones around the world — and as I've been using the developer version of the software since it was first pushed out in June, I can tell you about the best features coming your way.

The good news is that every iPhone that can run iOS 26 can also run iOS 27, though some of the more advanced Siri AI features (like the ability to change its pace and 'expressivity') are only available on the newer models with more powerful chipsets.

You'll get a notification popping up on your phone when iOS 27 is ready for you, but if you're not patient enough for that you can open up Settings on iOS and tap General > Software Update to see if there's an update waiting.

1. Reframe your photos

iOS 27 arrives with some clever AI-powered photo editing tricks, including one called Reframe. It lets you slightly change the angle of a picture you've taken, with AI adjusting the background to match.

In Photos, tap on an image to open it, then tap the icon showing three sliders at the bottom. If you then tap Tools and Reframe, you can touch and drag on the screen to change the perspective (use two fingers to pan and zoom). Tap Reframe to confirm.

The other options on the Tools menu can be useful too: Extend will use AI to imagine a wider background canvas for you, while Clean Up lets you remove specific objects or people from your images.

2. Create Shortcuts with natural language

The Shortcuts app is one of the most powerful tools available in iOS, but as we've written about before, it's not all that easy to use. With the new software update, building shortcuts becomes much easier: you can just describe the combinations you want using natural language, which significantly simplifies the process.

Shortcuts let you set up a myriad of automations and routines on your iPhone: turn text into audio, play a podcast after your morning alarm, tag notes in batches, let people know you're running late, create GIFs from videos, and a whole lot more. Open the Gallery tab in the shortcuts app for some inspiration.

With iOS 27 installed, if you tap the + (plus) button on the main All Shortcuts screen, you can simply describe what you want your shortcut to do — whether it's attaching screenshots to emails or summarizing your to do list for the day.

3. Choose a separate alarm volume

Not a feature that's going to necessarily grab the headlines, but definitely one of the most useful ones that I've come across since I first installed iOS 27: you can now set alarm volumes separately from the main ringtone and system volumes.

Head into Sounds & Haptics from Settings on iOS, turn off the Match Ringtone Volume toggle switch under Alarms and Timers, and set your preferred alarm volume — a customization that's been long overdue.

4. Adjust the Liquid Glass effect

The people asked, and Apple listened: you can now take the edge off the Liquid Glass effect if you find it a bit overwhelming in its default state. The available adjustments aren't huge, but you can tone it down (or turn it up) a little.

From Settings in iOS, tap Appearance > Liquid Glass. You get a slider that lets you shift from quite a lot of transparency (on the left) to hardly any transparency (on the right), with the changes previewed for you on the image above.

Apple has also done some cleaning up of Liquid Glass in iOS 27, so you should notice a few refinements as you start using the new operating system: as per Apple, Liquid Glass now offers "more uniform refraction and improved contrast", while individual app icons have been made "sharper and more detailed".

5. Siri AI

The biggest new feature in iOS 27 is the comprehensive upgrade that Siri's getting. It has a new name (the same as the old name, with "AI" on the end), plus vastly better underlying models (courtesy of Google) that mean it's now on a par with the likes of ChatGPT when it comes to the quality and breadth of answers you get.

So what's actually new? When it first lands, Siri AI will spend a while indexing everything on your phone, so it can give you more context about what's in your texts, calendars, and emails (none of this data gets sent back to Apple) — and it can take more actions inside apps too, including creating notes, rotating photos, resuming podcasts, and much more.

You can now give commands like "show me photos from when I went to Spain" with this personal context, and ask questions like "why do stars twinkle in the sky?" without the assistant handing off to ChatGPT. There's also a standalone Siri app for the first time, meaning you can save your chats and sync them across devices.

• Anthropic and OpenAI are asking governments to work together to slow risky innovation
• US politicians are factoring in AI into their arguments as midterm elections approach
• Trump currently worries that taking the foot off the throttle could let China overtake

Tech leaders at the forefront of AI, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, are publicly calling for slow AI innovation in order to buy more time to assess AI risks.

Among the risks highlighted in Amodei's warning are that AI systems could become impossible for humans to control, cyberattacks could become worse and AI could even facilitate biological weaponry.

Subsequently, he's called for external evaluators to gain deeper access to their models and safety processes, but crucially, Amodei advocate for greater government involvement.

Even AI companies want governments to step in

Anthropic's CEO is pushing for democratic countries to agree common AI safety standards and rules, and the eventual international coordination over the most dangerous AI capabilities, including with China.

And it's this international coordination that could prove key to slowing down risky innovation, because to date, US President Donald Trump has pushed back against warnings over worries that slowing down American companies would ultimately cause China to overtake the US.

"Whoever wins AI wins," Trump said (via CNBC).

"If Congress just races in and does some sort of emergency session to try to regulate AI, we will lose the race to China," House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said.

And for the US in particular, now is a more important time than ever. Democratic nominee for Governor of Texas Gina Hinojosa recently described data centers, and therefore AI, as "the fight of this election season."

There's an increasingly narrow pre-election window for legislation as the technology increasingly shows divides not just between the two big parties, but also within them.

"We've reached a new chapter in AI capabilities, and that demands a new chapter for AI policy," OpenAI Chief Global Affairs Officer Chris Lehane wrote. And with the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic, right at the top of American AI, warning about AI's potential impacts, Senator Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., likened the scenario to Dr. Frankenstein "telling us the monster is escaping."

With midterm elections just two months away, we're likely to see discussions around AI ramp up as politicians and influential leaders continue to get involved in guardrail discourse.

• US President Donald Trump says he supports Flock’s license plate cameras
• Most Americans oppose the installation of the devices, a survey suggests
• Several police officers have been arrested after abusing Flock tech

Flock’s automated license plate recognition (ALPR) cameras are continuing to hit the headlines, with the latest controversy being a series of arrests of police officers who were found to be misusing the tech for nefarious purposes. Yet some supportive comments from US President Donald Trump about Flock's cameras and a major new survey show the tech continues to be divisive, rather than unanimously rejected.

After an investigation by USA Today, at least three police officers have been arrested and a fourth was fired after the news outlet “alleged widespread Flock misuse,” which included repeatedly searching for and tracking individual vehicles that were not involved in any criminal activity.

However, it hasn't all been bad news for Flock this week. One significant supporter of the tech appears to be US President Donald Trump — when asked for his opinion on Flock aboard Air Force One, Trump responded that “I sort of like them because of that, because of law enforcement,” while adding that some people “think it’s an infringement.”

When a reporter suggested that Flock cameras “help catch a lot of criminals,” Trump said “I like them". A new survey, conducted for conducted for Reuters by the global market research and consultant firm Ipsos, also shows that while Flock cameras are broadly unpopular among the American public, there are some differences based on political persuasions.

Strong opposition to Flock

The Reuters survey polled 1,167 adults across the US and found that 47% of those questioned were opposed to the use of Flock cameras in their communities, while 38% were in favor. The remaining 16% said they were unsure.

The majority of Democrats and independents were against the cameras, as were almost all age groups, both male and female respondents, and both those with and without a college degree. However, Republicans and people aged 55 or above came out in favor of the use of Flock.

As for the police officer investigations, USA Today said they've led to at least 22 police officers being “arrested, fired, put on leave or placed under investigation” after they were found to have abused their access to Flock technology.

As a result of one officer in Columbus, Ohio being fired for searching for a single license plate 272 times without adequate reason, Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther said that the city will pause its use of Flock cameras “Until I can report out to the people of Columbus that this isn’t a more widespread issue, that this really is just one person or a few people misusing and abusing this technology.”

Meta’s new Muse AI platform would like the keys to your digital life to help run it for you. Muse is a personal AI agent that Meta built to complete tasks on your behalf, including sending emails, filling out forms, shopping, and pretty much any other activity with an online component.

The AI is available in the U.S. as an app, or through WhatsApp or the Muse.ai portal.

It's a familiar idea in some respects. Muse matches OpenAI and other AI developers in being able to open a browser inside its own cloud-based virtual computer and move between connected services. It returns when it has finished, encounters a problem, or needs permission to do something sensitive.

Meta describes the experience as having an agent that understands your goals and advances them independently. That can come off as sinister, even before it starts asking for permission to essentially be you online by having you sign in to all your online accounts.

Getting started is straightforward, although Muse is currently limited to U.S. adults. You can install the Muse app from your phone's app store, open Meta's Muse website or access it through WhatsApp. There is a free usage tier, while heavier users can pay $20 per month for Power or $100 for Maximum.

Muse shops for you

Once you open the app, the first thing the AI does is suggest you pick a nickname for it so you know when it is messaging you. I went with one of the suggested choices, and "Scout" proceeded to ask me what I'd like to do with it, offering a handful of popular options.

I asked Scout to do some shopping for me first, as the AI made it seem like a much smoother process than with other AI tools. I asked it to find me a pair of shorts. It asked my size and went off on its own for a couple of minutes, coming back with a couple of options and pointing to a sale on one particular set. I said okay, and it asked for my Amazon login to make the purchase on my behalf. For an everyday purchase, it was surprisingly pleasant to delegate.

That little interruption was reassuring and unsettling in almost equal measure. Meta says credentials entered this way are routed directly into secure credential storage and are not visible to the main Muse agent. Once stored, they can be inserted into the browser when needed without exposing the actual credentials to Muse's browser subagent. Muse does the legwork, while I remained the person responsible for deciding whether money actually left my account.

This is probably the easiest Muse task I would recommend trying yourself. Give it a product, let it browse, and take over whenever a login or other sensitive interaction appears. It demonstrates the agent's capabilities without immediately granting it access to years of personal correspondence.

Naturally, that was exactly what I did next.

Getting Muse to handle my email

I took the plunge and told Scout I wanted help with my email. I had to give it permission to go through my inbox and to write on my behalf, and it asked to use it to learn about me. With some trepidation, I okayed that, and it put together the kind of distorted image of my life you'd expect from someone basing their impression of you solely on your emails.

Scout also brought up an unopened email from the power company about needing to check my solar panels. It offered to write a reply if I could pick from the dates suggested for when they would visit. I did, and a minute later there was a draft pending my approval. It looked fine, and suddenly another little online errand was done.

It felt different from pasting an email into an AI chatbot. Muse's AI could retrieve the context itself rather than making me act as a courier between my inbox and the AI. Of course, it also felt a lot more personal. Meta has acknowledged how sensitive this access is and built specific defenses to prevent issues.

Muse's email connector filters out one-time tokens, password-reset links, and login links, while its Sentinel security layer controls what actions the agent is permitted to take outside its virtual machine. When an action requires my approval, the request comes through Muse's interface rather than simply relying on the agent to interpret a conversational yes.

I would keep that friction in place for email, particularly while getting used to Muse. Saving three minutes responding to a utility company is nice, but it is not worth discovering that your AI assistant has developed an unexpectedly adventurous correspondence style.

Muse is convenience mixed with discomfort

The more I engaged with Muse, the more the tandem senses of convenience and discomfort grew. Muse feels more frictionless than similar services with virtual browsers. And the combination of data Meta already has and the data it required permission to access made it feel more personal, too. Every improvement in its ability to help me came with another small moment where I had to decide how much access I was willing to grant.

Meta says conversations and VM data are not shared with its advertising systems, although browsing activity performed on your behalf can still influence advertising indirectly because websites may treat Muse's visits as your activity. Meta says sanitized agent interactions and tool activity can be used to train future models, but users can opt out with a switch in Muse's settings. Meta is also developing a Confidential VM mode intended to cryptographically prevent even Meta from accessing information inside the VM.

I was more impressed with Muse than I expected. But that only made me warier about it. Digital chores that consume more time than any one of them deserves are all too common at the moment, and Muse proved remarkably good at stepping into that gap. The catch is that the closer it gets to behaving like a genuinely useful personal assistant, the more personal information it needs to do the job.

If you're thinking of trying Muse then I would recommend starting gradually, beginning with public web tasks and keeping consequential actions behind approvals at first. The frustrating part is that Muse makes a very persuasive argument for personal AI agents. Meta has built something that makes handing an AI more of my digital life appealing, but not when it's attached to the current crop of tech giants offering those services.

iOS 27 is now rolling out to compatible iPhones, and this year, the list of models supported by Apple's new software update is impressively long.

Typically, Apple leaves a handful of iPhones out in the cold when releasing a new version of iOS — the iPhone XR, iPhone XS, and iPhone XS Max, for instance, couldn't run iOS 26 — but refreshingly, the device requirements for iOS 27 are the same as those for iOS 26.

That means the iPhone SE (2020), iPhone 11, iPhone 11 Pro, and iPhone 11 Pro Max — all of which you might have expected to lose support this year — will still be able to run iOS 27, which is an impressive showing of software support on Apple's part.

Alas, the device requirements for Apple Intelligence and Siri AI aren't so straightforward, so in this guide, we've detailed the support list for iOS 27, Apple Intelligence, Siri AI, and iPadOS 27.

iOS 27

Here’s the full compatibility list for iOS 27:

• iPhone SE (2020)
• iPhone 11
• iPhone 11 Pro
• iPhone 11 Pro Max
• iPhone 12
• iPhone 12 Pro
• iPhone 12 Pro Max
• iPhone 12 mini
• iPhone 13
• iPhone 13 Pro
• iPhone 13 Pro Max
• iPhone 13 mini
• iPhone SE (2022)
• iPhone 14
• iPhone 14 Plus
• iPhone 14 Pro
• iPhone 14 Pro Max
• iPhone 15
• iPhone 15 Plus
• iPhone 15 Pro
• iPhone 15 Pro Max
• iPhone 16
• iPhone 16 Plus
• iPhone 16 Pro
• iPhone 16 Pro Max
• iPhone 16e
• iPhone 17
• iPhone 17 Pro
• iPhone 17 Pro Max
• iPhone Air
• iPhone 18 Pro
• iPhone 18 Pro Max
• iPhone Duo

iOS 27 is supported by a whopping 33 iPhone models, which, if I'm not mistaken, is the largest-ever single pool of latest-update-compatible models.

What's more, iOS 27 began rolling out to all 33 of these models in one fell swoop on September 14 — Apple didn't ask owners of older iPhones to wait, which is something we've seen Samsung do, for instance, with its One UI updates.

It’s worth noting, however, that even though older models like the iPhone 11, iPhone 12, and iPhone 13 support iOS 27, Apple Intelligence — which includes features like Clean Up, Live Translation, and Apple's new AI-powered voice assistant, Siri AI — remains locked to the iPhone 15 Pro and newer.

Siri AI

As above, only those iPhones that are already compatible with Apple Intelligence will support Siri AI. The full list is as follows (I've included iPads and MacBooks, too):

• iPhone 15 Pro
• iPhone 15 Pro Max
• iPhone 16
• iPhone 16 Plus
• iPhone 16 Pro
• iPhone 16 Pro Max
• iPhone 16e
• iPhone 17
• iPhone 17 Pro
• iPhone 17 Pro Max
• iPhone Air
• iPhone 18 Pro
• iPhone 18 Pro Max
• iPhone Duo
• iPad models with M1 or later
• MacBooks with M1 or later
• MacBook Neo

Importantly, though, not all Siri AI features will be available on those iPhones, iPads, and MacBooks.

Specifically, expressive voices and advanced dictation are limited to devices powered by Apple’s "most powerful on-device model," AFM Core Advanced. Those devices are as follows:

• iPhone 17 Pro
• iPhone 17 Pro Max
• iPhone Air
• iPhone 18 Pro
• iPhone 18 Pro Max
• iPhone Duo
• iPad Pro models from 2024 and later (7th generation onwards)
• iPad Air models from 2026 and later (8th generation onwards)
• MacBook Pro models from 2023 and later
• MacBook Air models from 2024 and later

Additionally, those iPads and MacBooks will need to be equipped with at least 12GB of memory to be capable of running advanced Siri AI features.

Importantly, Siri AI isn't available in any form on iPhones and iPads in the European Union (EU) or China: "Unfortunately, due to the Digital Markets Act (DMA), Apple will not be able to ship Siri AI in the European Union with the release of iOS 27 and iPadOS 27. Over the past several months, EU regulators did not accept any of Apple’s proposed solutions to bring Siri AI to the EU while safely supporting other virtual assistants," Apple explained in a blog post.

Interestingly, though, EU users can access Siri AI on macOS 27 and visionOS 27.

So, frustratingly, you'll need to meet quite a few criteria if you're hoping to try the best version of Siri AI on your Apple device.

iPadOS 27

As for iPads, specifically, the only iPadOS 26-compatible models that don't also support iPadOS 27 are the iPad 10.2-inch (2020), iPad Air 10.5-inch (2019), and iPad mini 7.9-inch (2019).

Here’s the full compatibility list for iPadOS 27:

• iPad models from 2021 and later (9th generation onwards)
• iPad Air models from 2020 and later (4th generation onwards)
• iPad Pro models from 2017 and later (2nd generation onwards)
• iPad mini models from 2021 and later (6th generation onwards)

Side note: almost all iPad models are available in multiple sizes and in Wi-Fi-only and Wi-Fi + Cellular configurations, so, in the interest of readability, I’ve grouped the above models into dated categories.

• Oracle thinks AI will change how we use software, but we'll still use software for years to come
• Agents will interact with structured software, humans will manage those agents
• Overall software revenue dropped 3% but cloud revenue rose 60%

Oracle co-CEO Mike Sicilia just declared on the company's first earnings call of fiscal 2027 that "AI is an accelerator, not a replacement for packaged applications," hitting back against the SaaSpocalypse argument that warns AI could replace traditional software as we know it today.

Central to his argument is that enterprise suites offer standardized, end-to-end processes and rules that AI can't replace. But that's not to say that AI won't have its role in software going forward.

Sicilia admitted that employee training and upskilling has long been a drawback for many software packages, and that's where companies like Oracle could actually lean on artificial intelligence to improve things.

AI isn't going to replace software, Oracle says

With AI, employees no longer need to navigate so many complicated apps themselves, and AI agents can carry out tasks using the company's existing workflows and business rules. Humans will likely move over to supervisory roles, Oracle predicts.

"AI changes this dynamic," Sicilia said, noting that agentic AI could drastically reduce the time and cost involved with deploying enterprise applications.

"We are incredibly confident in the potential for this new paradigm to deliver much more rapid ROI for our customers," he added. The company is slated to add a new agentic AI accelerator to automate parts of SaaS implementation as soon as next month.

But the company isn't without its own challenges when it comes to AI and software. Despite a 10% rise in quarterly SaaS revenue, overall software revenue dropped 3%. Cloud revenue, which includes the company's infrastructure and AI capacity, grew a considerable 60%.

Looking ahead, Oracle's standpoint is that AI may change software interfaces, but it won't actually replace the software that lies beneath.

I don't see many 4K webcams for under $40 / £40, and with these specs, but Amazon has dropped the price of the Acer A640, which is ideal for those looking to improve the video quality on video calls.

• Best for: Remote workers, students and streamers who want high-resolution video for meetings, classes or broadcasts without spending too much money.

• The deal: The Acer A640 4K Webcam is reduced to $40 (was $50) at Amazon. In the UK, the A640 is now £37 (was £50) at Amazon.

• Why it matters: Excellent price for a 4K webcam. It combines a Sony 1/2.8-inch sensor with 4K recording at 30fps, AI noise-canceling microphone, and fast Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF) to eliminate focus-hunting during calls. You can also switch to 2K or 1080p at 60fps for smoother video. It also features automatic low-light correction, a physical privacy shutter, and a USB-A to C adapter to connect to desktops and laptops.

• The catch: You'll need to drop below 4K resolution if you want 60fps recording, and there are no built-in speakers. The 77.4-degree viewing angle is also better suited to an individual than a large group.

Why we recommend it

The Sony sensor and PDAF are two welcome features. PDAF is designed to lock onto its subject quickly, reducing the distracting focus hunting that can occur when you move around during a call or stream.

The maximum 4K setting suits situations where detail takes priority, while 1080p at 60fps is a useful alternative when you want smoother movement.

Its built-in microphone uses AI noise cancellation to reduce unwanted background sound, and automatic low-light correction adjusts exposure when your room isn't particularly bright.

The 4K webcam also comes with a USB-A to C adapter for plug-and-play capabilities across desktops and modern laptops.

Price context & historical value

Amazon is currently selling the Acer A640 for $39.98, compared with its regular $49.99 price. That works out to a $10.01 saving, putting it just under the $40 mark. This is the cheapest we've ever seen it to date.

Should you buy them?

✅ Buy the Acer A640 if...

You regularly make video calls, stream or create video content and want better image quality without spending a huge amount of cash. Its choice of 4K at 30fps or 1080p at 60fps gives you useful flexibility for different situations and meetings.

❌ Skip the Acer A640 if...

You only make occasional video calls and your laptop's built-in camera already does the job. Spending extra on 4K resolution and more advanced autofocus won't provide much benefit if image quality isn't particularly important to you.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

The headline 4K resolution is limited to 30fps, so you'll need to drop to 2K or 1080p to reach 60fps. There's no built-in speaker either, despite the webcam having its own microphone.

The 77.4-degree viewing angle is also relatively focused rather than extremely wide, which may not suit calls where you need to fit several people into the frame.

• Shop all webcam deals Amazon

• Windows 11's latest update breaks the sound on some PCs
• The September update also messes with File History
• Microsoft is working on a fix for the audio glitch, but we don't have an ETA

Windows 11's new update is breaking the audio on some PCs, thanks to the latest nasty bug that Microsoft has let slip through the QA testing net.

Windows Latest spotted that Microsoft has admitted that the September update has torpedoed the audio on some systems, in a post on the Windows release health dashboard.

Microsoft explains that: "Some USB Audio Class 1.0 devices might fail to start or produce audio."

As well as your speakers being eerily silent, the September update can also render the Sound panel in the Settings app unresponsive, which hardly helps when troubleshooting the issue.

One way you can check if your device is affected by this bug — assuming it has no audio, and you want to rule out other possible causes — is that in Device Manager you'll see a 'code 10' error ("this device cannot start") for your sound controller.

Windows Latest also informs us that this bug can affect microphones, as well as the PC's speakers.

It's not the only glitch with the September update, either, as users have reported problems with GPUs, and the File History feature going awry and failing to work.

File History is a capability that allows you to back up your files to an external drive (or elsewhere), so it's pretty important for those who use the functionality.

Analysis: negative vibes

Microsoft says this audio bug could manifest in other ways, so you might get sound when using standard stereo, but that audio might disappear when switching to multichannel playback. This means it's worth checking what your audio output is set to, and changing it back to stereo if it's currently using a different playback mode, which might just resurrect your sound.

Otherwise, there's not much that can be done, other than trying different audio output options on your Windows 11 system (Windows Latest observes that wireless audio devices don't appear to be affected). The other alternative is to remove the September update until Microsoft fixes this issue, although that will leave you without security patches.

When might we get a fix for this issue? Microsoft tells us: "We are working on a resolution and will update this documentation when more information is available."

This is a somewhat widespread problem by all accounts, and the File History bug is even more so, although the latter hasn't yet been acknowledged by Microsoft.

The reaction on Reddit is much as you might expect in terms of Windows 11 users blaming Microsoft's increased use of AI in coding the desktop OS, and observing that these kinds of bugs are why people don't want to migrate to the newer operating system.

As one Redditor observes: "And they wonder why people don't want to move from Windows 10."

Another notes: "Microslop can keep vibe coding all they want, I'm already on Linux."

Windows 10 is a sounder (ahem) bet for avoiding bugs, seeing as Microsoft isn't adding new features or messing with the codebase much, and ks only applying security fixes and essentials. That said, this of course doesn't mean Windows 10 is immune to glitches.

• Coveron and NordLayer found synthetic “digital Frankenstein” identities sold on dark web for ~$200
• Packages mix stolen data with AI‑generated names, deepfake selfies, and cloned voices to bypass KYC
• Researchers urge credit freezes, layered verification, and monitoring to counter rising synthetic identity fraud

You can now get your own “digital Frankenstein” for as little as $200, which will pass automated know-your-customer (KYC) checks on your behalf, and help you register fraudulent accounts with banks, cryptocurrency exchanges, and similar services. This is no longer a fringe, niche cybercriminal offering - it’s basically mainstream.

Recently, researchers from identity theft protection services Coveron and threat exposure management platform NordLayer Intelligence sifted through dark web forums and Telegram Channels, analyzing 22 queries over 362,000 posts related to identity fraud, deepfake services, and something they call “synthetic identity creation”.

A synthetic identity is essentially a fake, non-existent person, but created in a way that can fool many automated identity verification systems. It combines real stolen data, such as a Social Security number, with AI-generated fake information such as names, addresses, deepfake selfies, and cloned voices. The researchers call these identities” digital Frankensteins”, and claim they are “fully capable” of passing ID checks.

Rising popularity

Apparently, the number of posts and inquiries for synthetic identities is blowing up. In Q1 2024, there were roughly 40 posts a month discussing deepfakes. By Q2 2026, the number rose to 307 per month, an eightfold increase. It wasn’t a steady increase, either. Throughout 2025, the numbers remained similar to the year prior, and relatively flat. Only in 2026 the monthly averages jumped to 255 posts, the researchers warned.

Over the past year, there were more than 10,000 posts offering complete identity data, bundled with deepfake selfies and matching documents. All of this is being sold for around $200. To make matters worse, criminals don’t even have to purchase the entire package. They can buy parts of it (a deepfaked selfie, or a cloned voice), for as little as $10.

To protect against synthetic identity fraud, users should monitor personal data and act quickly if they discover a breach. Credits should be frozen if you’re not applying for new accounts, and everyone should be skeptical of unusual identity verification requests, Coveron explains. Businesses, on the other hand, should layer their verification systems and use identity theft protection services.

Mobile data can get expensive when you need hundreds of gigabytes every month, especially if you're using it as an alternative to fixed broadband. So, this 1000GB Data SIM deal, which gives access to Three and Vodafone networks, is the perfect fix.

• Best for: Remote workers, off-site travellers, and high-volume data users who want to pay a small amount upfront with no monthly charge or contract.

• The deal: 1000GB Three Data SIM for £58 (was £276) at Scancom when you use code HUKDHOT!!!. That works out at under £2.65 a month.

• Why it matters: This is a staggering saving on a mass-data SIM card. The SIM runs until July 2028 and your 1,000GB allowance renews on the 8th of every month. It also provides automatic access to both Three and Vodafone networks where available, and you can choose between a physical SIM and eSIM.

• The catch: There are no voice calls or texts included on this SIM, and no number porting. It's strictly for mobile data. Don't be misled by the £48 price on the page - that's the cost without VAT.

Today's best SIM deal

Why we recommend it

The 1,000GB monthly allowance means you'll have plenty of capacity for streaming, downloading large files, video calls and using a compatible device as a mobile hotspot.

Scancom says its SIMs are already activated and ready to use, and it uses MOCN, or Multi-Operator Core Network, technology to provide access to both Three and Vodafone networks, potentially improving coverage depending on where you're using it.

Price context & historical value

The standard price is £275.99, but applying code HUKDHOT!!! cuts it down to £48.30 before VAT and £57.96 after.

Unlike a conventional mobile contract, you're making a single upfront payment rather than paying another bill every month. With the service continuing until July 2028, this is an amazing deal.

Should you buy it?

✅ Buy Three's 1000GB data SIM if...

You need a huge amount of mobile data for a router, hotspot or another compatible device and qualify for the service. The combination of a 1,000GB monthly allowance, dual-network access and £57.96 upfront price is an incredible deal.

❌ Skip Three's 1000GB data SIM if...

You're looking for a conventional phone SIM or need to transfer your current number. There are no calls, SMS or roaming included, and number porting isn't supported.

The Catch: What to know before you buy

The advertised £48.30 discounted price you get in your basket when you apply the code doesn't include VAT. With it added you'll actually pay £57.96. This deal isn't available to everyone, either. Scancom states that customers must be businesses or sole traders, and individuals need to be registered as sole traders to qualify.

You should also check Three and Vodafone coverage before buying, as dual-network availability can vary by location. There's no built-in data-usage monitor, so you'll need to track consumption through your device or a third-party app.

If you exceed the 1,000GB allowance, your data resets rather than continuing beyond the limit. The service also has a content lock, although you can contact Scancom support to request its removal.

The appetite for AI in the market has never been greater. According to Gartner, over 90 percent of CIOs globally are increasing funding in AI, making it the fastest‑growing area of enterprise technology spend. As organizations look to integrate AI-powered workflows, from real-time analytics to personalized customer experiences, this ambition is accelerating investment in data initiatives.

Additional research shows that enterprises now spend an average of $29.3 million per year on data programs – which encompasses data movement, ingestion and preparation tooling, recurring cloud ingest and compute costs, and the internal engineering capacity required to keep pipelines running.

While this shift in spend mirrors the demands of scaling AI (organizations with successful AI initiatives invest up to four times more in data and analytics foundations), higher budgets do not automatically result in high‑quality data. Many businesses continue to miss out on the transformative impact of AI, held back by underlying weaknesses in their data architecture that slow delivery and limit returns.

Almost two thirds of data initiatives are underperforming

Despite unprecedented levels of investment, the majority of enterprise data initiatives continue to underperform – with 73 percent of organizations reporting their data initiatives are falling short of expectations. At the same time, nearly 62 percent report low levels of data maturity, pointing to a persistent gap between what organizations want their data and AI initiatives to deliver, and what their infrastructure is equipped to support.

Weak data foundations constrain innovation and carry measurable consequences for enterprise performance. In large organizations, downtime caused by data pipeline failures now exceeds 60 hours a month, disrupting productivity and costing an estimated £50,000 per hour in business impact. Data teams are also affected, as they spend over half of their engineering capacity on pipeline maintenance, rather than advancing new use cases.

Open Data Infrastructure as the foundation for AI

Beyond the day‑to‑day costs of downtime and maintenance, the deeper impact of unreliable data foundations is consistent disruption of AI initiatives. For AI systems to thrive, organizations need democratized, interoperable data programs, where access to data is fast, governed and reliable. In response, Open Data Infrastructure (ODI) has emerged as the foundation for AI.

ODI is an architectural approach that gives organizations greater control over how data is accessed, moved and used, by allowing tools and platforms to work together through shared, open standards. Instead of relying on tightly coupled, proprietary systems, ODI is built on a modular, standards‑based foundation that separates storage from compute, enabling each layer to evolve independently.

As data and AI workloads continue to grow, this creates a unified data environment where analytics and AI can scale more efficiently.

ODI is also emerging as a direct challenge to vendor lock‑in. The industry is seeing a shift towards data becoming more restricted, both technically and commercially. Often, these constraints show up as hidden costs or dependencies that push companies toward specific walled-garden ecosystems.

This problem is amplified when AI entities become an organization's primary data users. Indeed, studies suggest that non-human entities are present in modern enterprises at a ratio of 82:1 compared to humans.

For AI agents to work effectively alongside human users, a shared source of truth is essential. Dashboards, operational workflows, machine learning models and AI agents may all draw from the same underlying data, but often operate in separate environments with different definitions and models.

When those definitions drift, the result can be misaligned decisions, unreliable AI outputs and additional engineering overhead. ODI helps address this by giving every system, human or automated, a consistent view of the business.

Furthermore, AI agents generate exponentially more queries than humans, but closed ecosystems often route them through the same expensive compute infrastructure. Agents can only optimize for cost – opting for cheaper compute engines when appropriate – when open architectures afford them the opportunity to choose. And the cost considerations don’t stop there.

Organizations using legacy systems pay significantly more per data pipeline, which, when multiplied by the hundreds of pipelines at enterprise scale, adds up to a significant, ongoing expense.

Modern data management: flexible, portable, trusted

As investment in AI tools continues to ramp up, organizations must think ahead to alleviate the strain on both budgets and engineering resources. They should ensure AI systems have consistent access to fresh, trustworthy and context-rich data while maintaining control of their data and architecture to avoid lock-in.

Those that prioritize open foundations will create the right conditions for innovation and enable their data teams to focus on delivering real business value, from predictive modelling and real-time analytics to faster agent production.

The impact is ultimately reflected in performance outcomes. Research shows that organizations with modern, managed and open data foundations are nearly twice as likely to exceed their ROI targets than those relying on legacy systems – evidencing the direct correlation between data maturity and measurable success of AI initiatives.

We've featured the best AI website builder.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit

Samsung has just brought back its semi-regular cashback offer, allowing you to get up to £350 when you buy one of its latest phones, smartwatches, earbuds, or SSDs — including the Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Watch 9, and Galaxy Buds 4 Pro.

Accessing the offer is simple: buy an eligible product from an eligible retailer between now and October 9, then submit a claim through the dedicated Samsung Cashback site within 30 days of purchase.

Retailers participating in the offer include the big names and usual suspects, such as Amazon, Currys, Argos, AO, Very, and, of course, the official Samsung Store. Several major phone networks and retailers are also taking part, so you can choose to pick up a device on a contract with the likes of Tesco Mobile, Carphone Warehouse, and Mobile Phones Direct.

To get into some specific deals, the offer means you can pick up the brand-new Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 at the Samsung Store for £1,349 (was £1,699) after the £350 cashback — plus get up to an extra £730 off with a trade-in. That's a tempting one for me, after seeing our hugely positive 4.5-star review of Samsung's fascinating foldable.

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, meanwhile, comes with £300 cashback, dropping the price to £1,399 (was £1,699). And if you choose to buy the S26 Ultra from the official Samsung Store, you can get a guaranteed £150 off when you trade in any smartphone in any condition.

I will just point out that the cashback is provided in the form of a virtual prepaid Mastercard in the Samsung Wallet app. It's not as clean as cash being sent directly to your nominated bank account, but the card is eligible to be used in-person or online on whatever you like. An annoying extra step, but at least it's not restricted to specific retailers or uses.

If you're interested in checking out the promotion, I've listed some of the biggest eligible retailers below with links that take you directly to all of their latest deals on Samsung tech.

Samsung Cashback promotion — eligible retailers

• Amazon
• Samsung
• Currys
• Argos
• Very
• AO
• John Lewis
• Carphone Warehouse
• Mobiles.co.uk