<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Tech Writer Today Magazine by TechWhirl</title>
	
	<link>http://techwhirl.com</link>
	<description>Technical Communications articles and resources for Technical Writers and Technical Communicators.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/techwhirl/feed" /><feedburner:info uri="techwhirl/feed" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>techwhirl/feed</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Ftechwhirl%2Ffeed" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Ftechwhirl%2Ffeed" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/techwhirl/feed" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Ftechwhirl%2Ffeed" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Ftechwhirl%2Ffeed" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2Ftechwhirl%2Ffeed" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for May 17, 2013</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/vQ1SF_p1T74/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/technical-communication-recap-for-may-17-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Connie Giordano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comms and Content Round-Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topic-based writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love weeks like this on TechWhirl. With lots of varied, and heated threads on the email discussion list (cloud subscriptions, interactive documents, progressive disclosure and layered documents, among other interesting items), you should be able to find something to argue…err… talk about well into the weekend. ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/weekendrecap.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6716" alt="technical communication recap" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/weekendrecap.png" width="160" height="100" /></a>I love weeks like this on TechWhirl. With lots of varied, and heated threads on the <a href="http://techwr-l.com/" target="_blank">email discussion list</a> (cloud subscriptions, interactive documents, progressive disclosure and layered documents, among other interesting items), you should be able to find something to argue…err… talk about well into the weekend. And here&#8217;s the rest of the technical communication recap for May 17.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d rather lurk and read than debate, we had lots to choose from on the magazine and portals as well. Ryan Minaker is getting rave reviews for his <a href="http://techwhirl.com/book-review-content-strategy-connecting-the-dots/" target="_blank">rave review of Content Strategy: Connecting the Dots Between Business, Brand, and Benefits</a> (authored by Rahel Bailie and Noz Urbina). Jacquie Samuels offers a Getting Started guide to <a href="http://techwhirl.com/getting-started-with-topic-based-writing/" target="_blank">Topic-Based Writing</a>, and Craig Cardimon serves up some great commentary on content strategy, tech comm, customer experience management and user experience (be sure to check out the high school tech writers and their cardboard boat) in <a href="http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-16-2013/" target="_blank">Tech Writer This Week</a>.  When you’re finished with those, take a few minutes to vote in the new poll, where I resurrect a classic argument—<a href="http://techwhirl.com/techl-comm-poll-is-compelling-content-or-robust-structure-more-important/" target="_blank">is content or structure more important?</a> The terminology and the technology have changed, and we’re wondering if our direction should as well.  So do add your own opinion to the discussion.</p>
<p>So much to do and read, so little time… or so it seems when you’re doing your thing as a technical communicator. Grab some coffee, or tea, or maybe a mint julep, and relax with all the tech comm goodness you can handle.</p>
<p>Have a great weekend!</p>
<p>-Connie and the gang at TechWhirl</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4317" alt="Tech Writer This Week" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TechWhirl-Sphere-300dpi.png" width="168" height="167" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Tech Writer This Week for May 16, 2013" href="http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-16-2013/" target="_blank"><b>Tech Writer This Week for May 16, 2013</b></a></h2>
<p>In my job as a technical writer, one of the decisions I wrestle with every day concerns topic length. Is the topic short enough to retain readers but long enough to cover the material? If the topic is too short, should I merge it with another? If the topic is too long, should I break it into two topics? This is a lot of what I think about. So does Tom Johnson (I&#8217;d Rather Be Writing). Tech Writer This Week gives you other stuff to think about: research, content strategy, taxonomy, customer journey maps, UX, CXM, and cardboard boats&#8230; huh?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9296" alt="chain-fence-topics-sm" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/chain-fence-topics-sm.png" width="150" height="150" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Getting Started with Topic-Based Writing" href="http://techwhirl.com/getting-started-with-topic-based-writing/" target="_blank"><b>Getting Started with Topic-Based Writing </b></a></h2>
<p>Think for a minute about how you would like to see your writing described by a critic (say for the New York Times): sensible, understandable, logical, resonating, compelling, interesting…topical? Writing content that works for your readers, especially when it covers something technical and complex, doesn&#8217;t just happen. It takes some thought and planning to structure it, both to be usable and relevant to the reader, and to be reusable and effective for your organization. Enter: Topic-based writing.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9293" alt="compelling content or robust structure more important" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/structure-content-sm.jpg" width="150" height="135" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Tech Comm Poll: Is Compelling Content or Robust Structure More Important?" href="http://techwhirl.com/techl-comm-poll-is-compelling-content-or-robust-structure-more-important/" target="_blank"><b>Technical Communication Poll: Is Compelling Content or Robust Structure More Important?</b></a></h2>
<p>Technical communicators are, and probably always have been, a passionate bunch willing to debate the merits of their favorite points of view with anyone who has access to a keyboard and a connection. And at least as far back as the turn of the century, one of those classic debates has turned on content versus structure. Back then it was &#8220;Structure vs. Substance.&#8221; It&#8217;s also been technical versus writer. You could even argue that it&#8217;s about logic versus intuition. Today, we ask the question as our weekly tech comm poll: is compelling content or robust structure more important?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9283" alt="review content strategy connecting the dots" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/book_cover_content_strategy_connect_dots-sm.png" width="122" height="150" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Book Review: Content Strategy Connecting the Dots for an Epic Win" href="http://techwhirl.com/book-review-content-strategy-connecting-the-dots/" target="_blank"><b>Book Review: Content Strategy &#8211; Connecting the Dots for an Epic Win</b></a></h2>
<p>I have a habit of relating most things in my life to video games and board games (some people call this gamification). I find that this way of thinking is especially relevant on a professional level. My quest—as someone who produces and manages content within a content lifecycle—is to overcome obstacles, to complete these tasks, and to achieve my epic win. <i>Content Strategy: Connecting the Dots </i>is the strategy guide that gets me closer to the epic win.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Technical Communication News:</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://techwhirl.com/quark-joins-emc-information-intelligence-solutions-partner-program/" target="_blank">Quark Joins EMC Information Intelligence Solutions Partner Program </a></li>
<li><a title="The Rockley Group Licenses Rockley Strategic Method to Content Rules" href="http://techwhirl.com/the-rockley-group-licenses-rockley-strategic-method-to-content-rules/" target="_blank">The Rockley Group Licenses Rockley Strategic Method to Content Rules</a></li>
</ul>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=vQ1SF_p1T74:G93_bltBtAE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=vQ1SF_p1T74:G93_bltBtAE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=vQ1SF_p1T74:G93_bltBtAE:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=vQ1SF_p1T74:G93_bltBtAE:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/vQ1SF_p1T74" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/technical-communication-recap-for-may-17-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/technical-communication-recap-for-may-17-2013/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Writer This Week for May 16, 2013</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/zQrjcbEB-_Q/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-16-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Cardimon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comms and Content Round-Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content curation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer experience management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my job as a technical writer, one of the decisions I wrestle with every day concerns topic length. Is the topic short enough to retain readers but long enough to cover the material? If the topic is too short, should I merge it with another? If the topic is too long, should I break it into two topics? This is a lot of what I think about.  So does Tom Johnson (I'd Rather Be Writing).  Tech Writer This Week gives you other stuff to think about: research, content strategy, taxonomy, customer journey maps, UX, CXM, and cardboard boats... huh?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em><strong>Editor&#8217;s Note:</strong> For readers who want to enjoy <strong>Tech Writer This Week</strong> for May 16 via RSS without all the formatting issues, we&#8217;ve made it a bit easier by posting the introductory content here, and a link to the<a href="http://storify.com/TechWhirl/tech-writer-this-week-may-16-2013" target="_blank"> Storify curated content</a>.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><img class="aligncenter" alt="Tech Writer This Week for May 16, 2013" src="http://proxy.storify.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.yourdictionary.com%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Flg%2F1597.TechnicalWriting.jpg&amp;resize=1&amp;w=490" width="362" height="250" /></p>
<p>In my job as a technical writer, one of the decisions I wrestle with every day concerns topic length. Is the topic short enough to retain readers but long enough to cover the material? If the topic is too short, should I merge it with another? If the topic is too long, should I break it into two topics? This is a lot of what I think about. Tom Johnson (idratherbewriting.com) offers two interesting posts relevant to my dilemma. In the first post, he asks if short topics make information more findable. This is my current school of thought. In the second post, he takes the position that long topics are better for the user and explains why. As a lone tech writer, I love this stuff. Closing out <b><i>Technical Communication</i></b>, Column McAndrew opines that bad help breeds contempt. After all, if your dining experience at a restaurant isn&#8217;t memorable, are you going to return? Or will you avoid the place and tell your friends to do likewise?</p>
<p>Linda Newman Lior (uxmag.com) kicks off <b><i>User Experience </i></b>with tips on creating a successful information experience for your users. Bo Amidor (ux.walkme.com) follows up with three UX goals to keep in mind. And Thomas Wendt (uxbooth.com) ponders what matters more, intention or interpretation.</p>
<p>In<em id="__mceDel"> <b><i>Content Strategy &amp; Curation</i></b>, </em>we start with a primer on enterprise taxonomy from the good folks at Siteworx. Then John Waghorn (koozai.com) details the importance of research to building a content strategy (including all the same great reasons we do research in tech comm) On the curation side, TishiaSavesTime.com shares seven content curation tips for you  to follow. I was pleased to note that I am already following several of them. Jason Miner (curationsoft.com) closes this section with his take on the benefits of content curation.</p>
<p>The world of<b><i> Customer Experience Management</i></b> opens with David Ashton (SDL.com) encouraging us to unthink six sacred cows of CXM (and we&#8217;re wondering if unthinking is anything like cow tipping&#8230; but I digress). Writing in CMSWire, Ian Truscott gives us four superb reasons to be working with customer journeys, and Marisa Peacock explains what the customer journey is and how to use customer journey maps.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re at all like me and could use a good online technical dictionary, I found one offered by Computerlanguage.com. Elsewhere in<b><i> Career and Life,</i></b> Vic Laurie (www.TechSupportAlert.com) tells us about Process Explorer, a powerful and free Windows system tool. Bill Kerschbaum (intextwriting.com) follows up with a &#8220;cheat sheet&#8221; for better writing. Gotta love those cheat sheets. And we close out with a great story about high school tech writing teams and cardboard boats. Who knew deadlines and design could have such a soaking outcome?</p>
<p><strong>Continue to <a href="http://storify.com/TechWhirl/tech-writer-this-week-may-16-2013" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Tech Writer This Week on Storify</a>.</strong></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=zQrjcbEB-_Q:F-o7JUuBTlk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=zQrjcbEB-_Q:F-o7JUuBTlk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=zQrjcbEB-_Q:F-o7JUuBTlk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=zQrjcbEB-_Q:F-o7JUuBTlk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/zQrjcbEB-_Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-16-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-16-2013/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Comm Poll: Is Compelling Content or Robust Structure More Important?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/8RI-goRXeak/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/techl-comm-poll-is-compelling-content-or-robust-structure-more-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 09:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Connie Giordano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technical communicators are, and probably always have been, a passionate bunch willing to debate the merits of their favorite points of view with anyone who has access to a keyboard and a connection.  And at least as far back as the turn of the century, one of those classic debates has turned on content versus structure.  Back then it was "Structure vs. Substance." It's also been technical versus writer.  You could even argue that it's about logic versus intuition. Today, we ask the question as our weekly tech comm poll:  is compelling content or robust structure more important?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-9292" alt="poll - compelling content or robust structure more important" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/structure-content.jpg" width="250" height="225" />Time once again to reframe one of those classic debates in technical communication. STC Summit abounds in talking points, slide presentations, and demos that discuss everything from the intricacies of using various tools, to ways to demonstrate value, to pointers on polishing up the writing. Seeing demos, listening to participants and perusing the program lets us reflect on what&#8217;s important to us as professionals. Technical communicators are, and probably always have been, a passionate bunch willing to debate the merits of their favorite points of view with anyone who has access to a keyboard and a connection.  And at least as far back as the turn of the century, one of those classic debates has turned on content versus structure (<a href="http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/0006/techwhirl-0006-00483.html#.UZAwcLXCaSo" target="_blank">check the archives for some heated arguments</a> between some famous and infamous Whirlers).  Back then it was &#8220;Structure vs. Substance.&#8221; It&#8217;s also been technical versus writer.  You could even argue that it&#8217;s about logic versus intuition. Today, we ask the question as our weekly tech comm poll:  is compelling content or robust structure more important?</p>
<p>With the advances in tools, and the focus on producing great experiences for our users, the terminology has changed, but the question remains and it impacts how we move forward (or not) in our careers. Should technical writers (or technical communicators, content managers, producers or designers) focus more on compelling content that gets read and helps the user? Or should they place more emphasis on making it easier to reuse and to produce across many channels to provide ROI to the business?  Perhaps it&#8217;s the nature of what we do—to be conflicted in serving two (or more) masters (stakeholders in our PC world). We want to &#8220;balance&#8221; the needs of the user against the goals of the business, but how can we do that when looking at &#8220;cheaper, faster, or right—pick one&#8221;?</p>
<p>TechWhirl&#8217;s articles, and the email discussion list, split fairly evenly along tools versus skills questions.  So we can&#8217;t make this any easier. We&#8217;re asking you to pick one, and we&#8217;d love to hear why you choose one over the other.  &#8221;Both&#8221; is not an option, but I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s a right or wrong answer.  Does it depend on your innate ability to turn a phrase, or to streamline a process?  Is it more satisfying to get the phrasing just right, or to see it appear optimally in any medium you choose?  Or has the nature of what we are required to do changed so much that the question is no longer valid?  (You still have to pick one or the other, but that would be an interesting debate).</p>
<p>Take a few minutes to vote, share the poll with your colleagues, and post a comment here or on the<a href="http://techwr-l.com" target="_blank"> email discussion list.</a></p>
Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=8RI-goRXeak:Lb1V5D-Qx28:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=8RI-goRXeak:Lb1V5D-Qx28:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=8RI-goRXeak:Lb1V5D-Qx28:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=8RI-goRXeak:Lb1V5D-Qx28:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/8RI-goRXeak" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/techl-comm-poll-is-compelling-content-or-robust-structure-more-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/techl-comm-poll-is-compelling-content-or-robust-structure-more-important/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Content Strategy Connecting the Dots for an Epic Win</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/Jyk8Rv2txoo/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/book-review-content-strategy-connecting-the-dots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 09:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Minaker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechWhirl Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a habit of relating most things in my life to video games and board games (some people call this gamification). I find that this way of thinking is especially relevant on a professional level. My quest—as someone who produces and manages content within a content lifecycle—is to overcome obstacles, to complete these tasks, and to achieve my epic win. Content Strategy: Connecting the Dots is the strategy guide that gets me closer to the epic win.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Content Strategy: Connecting the Dots Between Business, Brand, and Benefits, by Rahel Anne Bailie and Noz Urbina</h2>
<blockquote><p><b><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-9285" alt="stars-5 of 5" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/stars-5-of-5.png" width="100" height="20" /> </b><i>“Highly recommended to anyone looking to take their existing business-critical content life-cycle to the next level.”</i></p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-9282" alt="review: content strategy connecting the dots" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/book_cover_content_strategy_connect_dots.png" width="195" height="240" />I have a habit of relating most things in my life to video games and board games (some people call this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamification" target="_blank">gamification</a>). I find that this way of thinking is especially relevant on a professional level. My quest—as someone who produces and manages content within a content lifecycle—is to overcome obstacles, to complete these tasks, and to achieve my epic win:</p>
<ul>
<li>Have content recognized as a business asset</li>
<li>Continuously demonstrate a positive return on investment (ROI)</li>
<li>Make content more valuable to users, by continuously improving the user experience (UX)</li>
<li>Make content adaptable enough to be future friendly (multi-channel publishing)</li>
<li>Leverage existing technologies (markup and semantics) and industry best practices (structured content and reuse models)</li>
<li>Use content assets to manage risks, wherever possible</li>
<li>Implement a repeatable process for implementing, managing and growing these tasks</li>
</ul>
<p>Anyone who’s ever played a game without a strategy probably realized they should have had one. Sure, you might win the game or eventually complete your quest, but at what cost? Why spend 100 hours accomplishing something that you could have accomplished in 50; or why do something wrong three times when you can do it right the first time? This is where a strategy guide would come in handy.</p>
<p>The snapshot review: <em>Content Strategy: Connecting the Dots Between Business, Brand, and Benefits </em>is the strategy guide I was looking for (weighing in at 383 pages for the eBook version). It contains just about everything you would ever need to know to get started developing a comprehensive content strategy, in any industry, and for any type of content.  Authors Rahel Bailie and Noz Urbina have put a lot of their thought leadership and practical experience into a book that serves its readers well in achieving that epic win. As a gamer, I found it easy to interpret the book’s content:</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Introduction </b>(to<b> </b>business-critical content and content strategy)</li>
<li><b>Your first day in the field</b> (why having a content strategy is important, how it can add value to your organization)</li>
<li><b>Tactics </b>(why content should be treated as a critical business asset and the importance of ROI and UX)</li>
<li><b>Resource management</b> (a close look at what content is, and why this resource is so critical)</li>
<li><b>Tools, equipment, and crafting</b> (the importance of using the right tools and technologies to create and manage content)</li>
<li><b>To battle</b> (developing and implementing a content strategy)</li>
<li><b>Glossary</b></li>
</ul>
<p>Overall, I’m really impressed with this book. As someone who’s worked in the technical communications field for over ten years, most of the terminology, strategies, processes, and technologies etc. were already familiar to me. The information is well-focused, well-organized and easy-to-read, a trifecta for professionals who have packed schedules and a need to advance their skills and knowledge.</p>
<p>The authors clearly state that this is not a ‘how to’ book. I tend to agree with that; however, there are several case studies that did contain valuable ‘how to’ type information. But the real value, I found, was how the authors brought everything together to explain why content lifecycle and content strategy are important, why you shouldn’t have one without the other, and then listed all the things that need to be considered.</p>
<p>Since content strategies come with often-hefty price tags, being able to being able to sell your sponsor on this idea is crucial. Noz and Rahel present the business case for content strategy in clear and compelling terms. They also manage to bridge the gap between the technical side of things (XML, DITA, semantics, and structured content) and the business side of things (ROI, risk management, and brand building).</p>
<p>I recommend this book to anyone who’s interested in content strategy or anyone who works with content now (with or without an existing strategy in place). I recently noticed that <i>content strategy</i> (+16%) was one of only two skills on my LinkedIn profile that were identified as trending upwards (the other one was <i>online publishing</i>). So jump on this trend, buy this book now, and plot a strategy towards achieving your epic win.</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding-left: 10px;" valign="top" width="150"> <iframe style="width: 120px; height: 240px;" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=tech037-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=1937434168&amp;ref=tf_til&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;m=amazon&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=000000&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" height="240" width="320" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></td>
<td valign="top" width="500"><strong>Title</strong>: Content Strategy: Connecting the Dots Between Business, Brand, and Benefits<strong>Authors:</strong> Rahel Anne Bailie and Noz Urbina</p>
<p><strong>Paperback:</strong> 306 pages</p>
<p><strong>Publisher:</strong> XML Press (December 28, 2012)</p>
<p><strong>Language</strong>: English</p>
<p><strong>ISBN-10:</strong> 1937434168</p>
<p><strong>ISBN-13:</strong> 978-1937434168</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><b> </b></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=Jyk8Rv2txoo:Ah6c1opq8uk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=Jyk8Rv2txoo:Ah6c1opq8uk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=Jyk8Rv2txoo:Ah6c1opq8uk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=Jyk8Rv2txoo:Ah6c1opq8uk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/Jyk8Rv2txoo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/book-review-content-strategy-connecting-the-dots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/book-review-content-strategy-connecting-the-dots/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Tech Writer This Week for May 9, 2013</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/Hpr_-ox-7cs/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-9-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig Cardimon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comms and Content Round-Ups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The STC Summit 2013, held in Atlanta, Georgia this year, got off to an excellent start with an entertaining and eye-opening keynote address by New York Times technology columnist David Pogue. Larry Kunz (sdicorp.com) shares his impressions of the summit. The STC posted a ton of photos, tweets, and slideshows on eventifier.co and we also offer our annual Pinterest board for your enjoyment. The slides are great. I've seen a few shows already, and have dogeared more to view. After which, enjoy some great posts on tech comm, content strategy, and user experience.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em><strong>Editor&#8217;s Note:</strong> For readers who want to enjoy <strong>Tech Writer This Week</strong> for May 9 via RSS without all the formatting issues, we&#8217;ve made it a bit easier by posting the introductory content here, and a link to the<a href="http://storify.com/TechWhirl/tech-writer-this-week-may-9-2013" target="_blank"> Storify curated content</a>.</em></p></blockquote>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9277" alt="Tech Writer This Week for May 9, STC Summit '13" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/2013SummitLogo.png" width="300" height="92" />The STC Summit 2013, held in Atlanta, Georgia this year, got off to an excellent start with an entertaining and eye-opening keynote address by <em>New York Times</em> technology columnist David Pogue. Larry Kunz (sdicorp.com) shares his impressions of the summit and Danielle Villegas (techcommgeekmom.com) and Sarah Maddox (ffeathers.wordpress.com) also have a few things to talk about. The STC posted a ton of photos, tweets, and slideshows on eventifier.co. The slides are great. I&#8217;ve seen a few shows already, and have dogeared more to view. Remember to take a look at our <a href="http://pinterest.com/techwhirl/2013-stc-summit/" target="_blank">annual Pinterest board</a>, offered for your enjoyment.</p>
<p>Elsewhere in <b><i>Technical Communication</i></b>, Scriptorium Publishing posts a slideshow on the state of the tech comm industry. Joe Merlino (terraxml.com) talks about the fundamentals of technical writing. And in an older but still valid post, Gary Hoffman (arrl.org) offers his opinions on why no one reads manuals.</p>
<p>In<b><i> User Experience</i></b>, Paul Brooks (uxmag.com) wonders if your website offers a Home button, calling it a &#8220;Get out of jail free&#8221; card. Danielle Arad (ux.walkme.com) lists 19 UX thought leaders you should know about, and then follows up with a library of 75 UX resources.</p>
<p><b><i>Content Strategy &amp; Curation</i></b> features Sean Li (seo-hacker.com) describes his approach to developing a user-centric content strategy.  Then in curation, Ian Lurie (portent.com) shares his tips for doing content curation in just 13 minutes a day. (I need to step up my game.) On a similar note, Laura Crest (seocopywriting.com) offers her own great time-saving content curation strategies, many of which I&#8217;m already doing. And Scott Scanlon closes this section with an intriguing podcast, wondering if commentary is necessary for content curation.</p>
<p>Minda Zetlin (www.inc.com) shares five ways to mow through a tough task in <i><b>C</b></i><b><i>areer and Life</i></b>. Kim Komando (usatoday.com) discusses five email tricks everyone should know. And on a lighter note, Matt Petronzio (mashable.com) has a PC Weenies cartoon on experiencing life away from your computer screen.</p>
<p><strong>Continue to <a href="http://storify.com/TechWhirl/tech-writer-this-week-may-9-2013" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Tech Writer This Week on Storify</a>.</strong></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=Hpr_-ox-7cs:u1xr3DupPIg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=Hpr_-ox-7cs:u1xr3DupPIg:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=Hpr_-ox-7cs:u1xr3DupPIg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=Hpr_-ox-7cs:u1xr3DupPIg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/Hpr_-ox-7cs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-9-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-9-2013/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Adobe Day @ STC Summit 2013</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/WesmiUtLa8Q/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/adobe-day-stc-summit-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 15:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Connie Giordano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Writer Today Magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe calls it a "thought leadership and networking platform." We call it fascinating, fun and worth far more than a half day's effort in Hotlanta on May 5. Back by popular demand, Adobe Day at the STC Summit in Atlanta featured thought leadership, debate and great networking opportunities for the participants... and oh yeah... great food and hospitality provided by the TCS 4 team.  Folks in the room were treated to a keynote by the "Father of Framemaker," Charles Corfield (nVoq), offering a glimpse at the past and a look at the future.  ]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Editor&#8217;s Note:</strong> For readers who want to enjoy our<b> Storify of Adobe Day </b>via RSS without all the formatting issues, we&#8217;ve made it a bit easier by posting the introductory content here, and a link to the<a href="http://storify.com/TechWhirl/adobe-day-stc-summit-2013" target="_blank"> Storify curated content</a>.</em></p>
<p>Adobe calls it a &#8220;thought leadership and networking platform.&#8221; We call it fascinating, fun and worth far more than a half day&#8217;s effort in Hotlanta on May 5.</p>
<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-7219" alt="Try Adobe Technical Communication Suite 4" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/PPBU_Q212_tcs4_banner_stc_140x40.jpg" width="140" height="40" /></p>
<p>Back by popular demand, Adobe Day at the STC Summit in Atlanta featured thought leadership, debate and great networking opportunities for the participants&#8230; and oh yeah&#8230; great food and hospitality provided by the TCS 4 team.  Folks in the room were treated to a keynote by the &#8220;Father of Framemaker,&#8221; Charles Corfield (nVoq), offering a glimpse at the past and a look at the future.</p>
<p>Rahel Bailey (Intentional Design) talked about the content economy and how to prepare for it and succeed in it. John Daigle (Evergreen Online Learning) chauffeured the group down the mobile documentation highway. Mark Lewis (Quark) hammered home ways to develop useful metrics  for content carpenters. And the soon-to-be-(in)famous panel of thought leaders weighed in on a few questions that should matter to all of us in technical communication.</p>
<p>If you couldn&#8217;t be in Atlanta for the STC Summit, zip on through these comments, posts and photos to get the highlights and big tweetable moments from Adobe Day 2013.</p>
<p><strong>Continue to <a href="http://storify.com/TechWhirl/adobe-day-stc-summit-2013" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Adobe Day at STC Summit 2013 on Storify</a>.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=WesmiUtLa8Q:2n4YFoSphhE:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=WesmiUtLa8Q:2n4YFoSphhE:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=WesmiUtLa8Q:2n4YFoSphhE:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=WesmiUtLa8Q:2n4YFoSphhE:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/WesmiUtLa8Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/adobe-day-stc-summit-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/adobe-day-stc-summit-2013/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>TechWhirl: Technical Communication Recap for May 3, 2013</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~3/KG5Iuou-LPI/</link>
		<comments>http://techwhirl.com/techwhirl-technical-communication-recap-for-may-3-2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 14:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Connie Giordano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comms and Content Round-Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubiquitous computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwhirl.com/?p=9235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechWhirl is packing up and heading for Atlanta to attend the STC Summit.  If you're planning to be there, stop by our booth and say hi.  And, if you'd like to contribute to our Pinterest Board or Storify curations, we're always happy to oblige.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6716" alt="technical communication recap for may 3, 2013" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/weekendrecap.png" width="160" height="100" />TechWhirl is packing up and heading for Atlanta to attend the <a href="http://summit.stc.org/" target="_blank">STC Summit</a>.  If you&#8217;re planning to be there, stop by our booth and say hi, and hang around to hear Al at the Lightning Talks.  And, if you&#8217;d like to contribute to our <a href="http://pinterest.com/techwhirl/2013-stc-summit/" target="_blank">Pinterest Board</a> or Storify curations, we&#8217;re always happy to oblige.</p>
<p>Before we head out, we want to give you the highlights of this week’s TechWhirl activity in our communication recap for May 3. Settle in with a cup of coffee or tea, and enjoy a good laugh with <a href="http://techwhirl.com/humor-from-the-sidelines-family-tech-support/" target="_blank">another classic humor piece</a> from Lisa Higgins.  Take a look at what’s happening in tech comm social media and the blogosphere with Craig Cardimon’s <a href="http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-2-2013/" target="_blank">Tech Writer This Week.</a>  And remember to vote in the new technical communication <a href="http://techwhirl.com/tech-comm-poll-ubiquitous-computing-changing-tech-comm/" target="_blank">poll on the impacts of ubiquitous computing</a>.  More importantly, share your thoughts on the <a href="http://techwr-l.com/" target="_blank">email discussion list</a>, or by posting a comment to the poll introductory article.</p>
<p>Hope to see lots of Whirlers in Atlanta!</p>
<p>Have a great weekend!</p>
<p>-Connie and the gang at TechWhirl</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4317" alt="Tech Writer This Week" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TechWhirl-Sphere-300dpi.png" width="168" height="167" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Tech Writer This Week for May 2, 2013" href="http://techwhirl.com/tech-writer-this-week-for-may-2-2013/" target="_blank"><b>Tech Writer This Week for May 2, 2013</b></a></h2>
<p>Tech Writer This Week heads into some new territories, with a new topic area, and some controversy in our old standbys. First in the standbys is Technical Communication. I&#8217;d venture a guess that most people think of technical writers as the quiet sort (I do my best to fly under the radar). But being quiet doesn&#8217;t mean we shy away from controversy. Peruse User Experience and then Content Strategy &amp; Curation. Dive into our new area of Customer Experience Management, and finish off with some Career and Life goodies.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9229" alt="family-tech-support-sm" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/family-tech-support-sm.png" width="134" height="151" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Technical Writing Humor: From the Sidelines on Family Tech Support" href="http://techwhirl.com/humor-from-the-sidelines-family-tech-support/" target="_blank"><b>Technical Writing Humor: From the Sidelines on Family Tech Support </b></a></h2>
<p>About a month ago, my dorky little brother was in town. As usual, he drove to Colorado from New Mexico with a truck full of stuff. Once, after he left, I counted fourteen bicycles in my garage. Once, I ended up with a cat. Always, though, I get computer stuff. This time, though, I didn&#8217;t get all of it. See, my mother lives maybe five miles away from me, and my brother gave her a computer, too.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="225"> <img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9216" alt="computer-head-ubiquitous-sm" src="http://techwhirl-1.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/computer-head-ubiquitous-sm.jpg" width="150" height="112" /></td>
<td valign="top" width="425">
<h2><a title="Technical Communication Poll:  How Is Ubiquitous Computing Changing Tech Comm?" href="http://techwhirl.com/tech-comm-poll-ubiquitous-computing-changing-tech-comm/" target="_blank"><b>Technical Communication Poll: How Is Ubiquitous Computing Changing Tech Comm? </b></a></h2>
<p>We started a fascinating conversation on TechWhirl with last week&#8217;s poll question. Respondents are almost evenly split on whether wearable computers will change tech comm. Based on the commentary, we&#8217;ve attempted to extend the question. Wearable computers are merely a new iteration of a concept first discussed 25 years ago—ubiquitous computing. The question is not whether it will change tech comm, but rather how is ubiquitous computing changing tech comm.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Technical Communication News:</h3>
<ul>
<li>NextDocs 6 Flexible Deployment Options Drive Faster Adoption and Lower Costs | <a href="http://ow.ly/2wxhGw">http://ow.ly/2wxhGw</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Social Media and the Chance to Follow TechWhirl:</h2>
<ul>
<li>Our Google Plus Page – what’s happening behind the scenes | <a href="http://goo.gl/SO0R4">http://goo.gl/SO0R4</a></li>
<li>Will you be our Friend? Please, you know you want to click | <a href="http://goo.gl/tDrW7">http://goo.gl/tDrW7</a></li>
<li>Want all this TechWhirl goodness a few characters @ a time | <a href="http://goo.gl/itjDg">http://goo.gl/itjDg</a></li>
<li>Updates from TechWhirl delivered to your email in box | <a href="http://bit.ly/tjshxU">http://bit.ly/tjshxU</a></li>
<li>Or, try our RSS feed (great on Flipboard) | <a href="http://goo.gl/msLzu">http://goo.gl/msLzu</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>SPONSOR-Luv</h2>
<p>We want to send a very special “thank you” to our sponsors for their support.</p>
<p><b>Platinum</b>: <a href="http://www.runaware.com/clients/adobe/techsuite/">Adobe Systems Incorporated</a></p>
<p><b>Gold: </b><a href="http://bit.ly/doc-to-help">ComponentOne Software</a>,<b> </b><a href="http://www.madcapsoftware.com/products/flare/overview.aspx#whatsnew">Madcap Software</a><b></b></p>
<p><b>Silver</b>: <a href="http://pr.viu.ca/techcomm/">Vancouver Island University</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=KG5Iuou-LPI:T4PCYHgs8s4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=KG5Iuou-LPI:T4PCYHgs8s4:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?a=KG5Iuou-LPI:T4PCYHgs8s4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/techwhirl/feed?i=KG5Iuou-LPI:T4PCYHgs8s4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/techwhirl/feed/~4/KG5Iuou-LPI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://techwhirl.com/techwhirl-technical-communication-recap-for-may-3-2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://techwhirl.com/techwhirl-technical-communication-recap-for-may-3-2013/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
