A Contract Between You and Me: The Philosopher’s Agreement

I assume that you are a thinking person. If you are a thinking person, you are a philosopher, and I ask you to join me in what I call the “Philosopher’s Agreement” as you read on.

The Philosopher’s Agreement is a traditional agreement philosophers have observed to place the focus on ideas and not their originators. The term ad hominem refers to an attack made on a philosopher instead of the ideas of the philosopher, and ad hominem attacks of course violate the Philosopher’s Agreement.

The Philosopher’s Agreement goes much further than merely prohibiting ad hominem attacks — it supports the philosopher’s search for ever greater understanding. According to this agreement, you have two options when you detect a flaw in my presentation:

1. If you cannot see how to correct the flaw, it is your privilege to describe the flaw and your obligation to share any thoughts you have about how to correct the flaw.

2. If you can see how to correct the flaw, it is your obligation to describe both the flaw and your solution for correcting the flaw.

Tetryonic Theory strongly supports the Electric Universe's model of Electromagnetic interactions driving the physics of our Universe on all scales. A closer examination of this work will reveal how equilateral [squared] Planck energy momenta can easily extend and give shape to your current EM models and correct many of the mathematical misconceptions that have arisen over time from extrapolating math without foundation. We invite you to review the work with an open mind.

"Mathematics [as a scientific language] has simply failed to explain how physics works...... equilateral Planck geometry on the other hand offers a concise, coherent explanation of all of the mechanics of the Universe.... The Maths of physics is a language in search of geometric grammar."K.C. Abraham

As Feynman observed, “Mathematicians…do not even need to know what they are talking about.”

"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."K.C. Abraham

Tetryonics requires more than just a quick look. A quick look will always result in immediate dismissal because most of us lack the reference frame necessary to approach something so vastly different than what's been shoved down our thoughts for so long.

Looking at the actual materials with a keen eye to detail will systematically present substance of an uncanny variety. A quick glance just won't cut it here folks.

"...namely physics and maths are not one and the same thing; whilst you can model physics with (some) math, you cannot and should not use just any maths to model physics." K.C. Abraham

The geometric interpretation of the mathematics is important primarily because it is one of the essentials for an understanding of the relationship between mathematics we invent and the physical phenomena it seeks to describe for us.

While Mathematics is the language of Science – Geometry is its Grammar. And the Math Must follow the Geometry. Without this rigid geometry to guide the math, many erroneous assumptions have led us astray.

To not pause every now and then, take stock of our theories and subject them to a rigorous analysis invites us to wander down blind alleys and cul-de-sacs of experimentation when our resources and efforts could be better utilized elsewhere bettering the Human condition.

Since the discovery of Electric and Magnetic forces, and their unification with Mathematics we have sought to describe their effects and developed in-numerable electrical technologies that have advanced the standard of living for many across the planet as the electric genie took up the grindstone for us in our technological society and brought us all closer together than ever before.

Imagine what could have been achieved had we a consistent, realistic model of the quantum forces at work that gave rise to the wonder that is electrical energy and could control it at that level.

Only equilateral geometry can unite the duality of electric and magnetic forces that give rise to the known observables and the mathematics that describes them so eloquently - a triangle.

This new take on the role of an old and familiar geometry is now presented to the reader so as to reconcile the known observations with the mathematics of physics; in turn uniting the two and correcting the assumptions and errors that have crept in during the nascent development of the Sciences and prejudiced our understanding of this force of Nature to this day.

Adding to the mysteries of quantum mechanics is a number of well-known QED effects that have also eluded physical explanation - to date. In 1865, James Maxwell Clerk unified the then disparate theories of Electric and Magnetic fields into a theory of Electromagnetism and related then to the velocity of light.

The exact quantum geometry of EM wave geometries ( and the Photons comprising them) that explains their Wave functions and observed interference patterns represents one of the greatest challenges to developing a concise fully realized quantum theory of EM radiation.

Wave-Particle duality dating back to the 17th century is perhaps the best known example of quantum behavior that has defied precise modeling despite intense effort by scientists around the World for over two centuries.

The application of equilateral energy to the charged geometries of Photons and EM waves not only explains these long standing mysteries but also removes the quantum fuzziness introduced by Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle, thus clearing the way for science to develop an advanced understanding of Electricity, its role in Quantum ElectroDynamics and provide new clean forms of energy from the quantum processes."KCA

For the first time in human history we now have a proper definition of mass-Energy-Matter and we have unified Planck with Einstein as there is a major failing in regards to the way modern physics understands it today. hv does not equal hf and this must be corrected in every text book moving forward. Rather [2hv=hf] basically highlighting that modern physics has yet to distinguish between even and odd numbers of energy quanta. Unbelievable really. What we are suggesting is that without the proper Geometric Key, math is writing their own sentences without any grammar to speak of.

Using Equilateral Energy all the geometries of quantum EM mass-Matter particles can be physically modeled revealing the known standard model particles.

Bosons are shown to be transverse EM fields that facilitate EM induction and photons are revealed as longitudinal dual-charge pairs possessing a neutral EM charge and inherent magnetic moment.

The net uni-directional momentum of bosons then distinguishes them from photons that possess a bi-directional momentum.

Closer examination of the geometries highlights a long-standing error is the mathematical formulation of QM energy formulae, namely the mistaken interchanging of planks quanta [v] for Einstein’s frequency[f] in relation to energy. It, in fact, takes 2 charged Bosons [hv] to create a neutral Photon [hf] mathematically equating the two [as historically has been the case] is the same as saying 2=1.

Tetryonics itself has 3 main laws.

1) The first one being that Energy itself is equilateral.

2) The second one is that the law of interaction and all energy in what ever form it is will seek equilibrium.

3) The third law states that once the system is in motion and it's seeking equilibrium, it will continue indefinitely as it cycles through it's various forms backwards and forwards.

The 3rd Law of Tetryonics just simply highlights that our Universe [and all the physics of mass-ENERGY-Matter in motion] is made up of finite, deterministic eq. Planck quanta.

As a result the appearance of ‘infinity’ in ANY equation of physics must not be taken seriously as it is simply a mathematical way of saying ‘we don’t really know the precise number here but it is big]…. As a result equations in QED etc. must be re-normalised [i.e. have their infinities cancelled out by introducing negative infinities that were never in [or resulted from] the equations to begin with, in order to make sense of the work and GR leads to infinite energy densities at point singularities causing its equations to fail when trying to look a t quantum processes – thus introducing Black holes etc.]

Clearly, mathematical nonsense of this sort has to stop and any unified theory of mass-energy-Matter changing in space over time that covers and unifies QM, QED, Chemistry and Cosmology on all scales of physics using finite, deterministic quanta should NOT have infinities anywhere in them… AT ALL.

Eternity however is a subtly different beast entirely, it describes a never-ending, changing, dynamic system over time and this accurately models our physical Universe where ENERGY in all its forms and expressions is in constant, endless motion as it seeks a state of equilibrium between gravitational Matter and radiant mass-energy momenta.

Hence the 3rd Law of Tetryonics is born.

Tetryonics is a new quantum theory of mass-energy Matter, stemming from a radical reinterpretation of what 'square' numbers are in physics and their application to Quantized Angular Momentum (QAM). It can now be shown through the geometry that the QAM of Planck’s constant is in fact the result of its quantized Equilateral Triangular Geometry, not a vector rotation about a point.

For further reference concerning the Tessellation of Equilateral Geometries, I recommend looking at Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory. He connects these idea up in a purely mathematical way, and goes a long way to showing that Tetryonics is in fact headed in the right direction.

http://www.principlesofnature.net/number_geometry_connections/scale

http://tetryonictheory.com/omega-unit

The equilateral geometry itself gives rise to the physical properties of charge, electrical permittivity, magnetic permeability and the rigid physical relationships between inertial mass-energy and moment in physical systems at the quantum level. Charge(QAM/C2) ,in addition to its role as the geometric source of physical properties, also provides the quantum framework for radiant 2D mass-energies to become 3D standing waves Matter geometries facilitating the development of large scale physical systems of atoms, compounds, stars and galaxies throughout our universe.

Hitherto unexplained and mysterious properties of quantum mechanics are now revealed as having their origin in the geometry of Planck’s constant itself.

We are dealing with a single Equilateral Energy 'qoin', with a plus side, and a negative side. Meaning a plus charge, and a negative charge exist as a heads and tails configuration, and if one energy coin was firmly in between you and I, I might be looking at the positive charge, while you would be measuring the same energy quanta, only your reading would be that of a negative charge.

]]>

Tetryonics_For_Dummies.pdf

**Tetryonics: Challenging and correcting the foundations of quantum theory**

Electric field permittivity has a 2pi (rhombic) field geometry while magnetic field permeability is always the result of two separate equilateral magnetic fields that form a magnetic dipole moment.

Where two or more rhombic electric fields interact a Coulombic –charge force of interaction results.

Where two or more equilateral magnetic fields interact a Gaussian-Ampere forces of interaction results. [*opposite fields attract - same fields repel*]

The classical model of the unidirectional electrostatic force fields of point charged particles is corrected to show a bidirectional arrangement of equilateral Planck energy momenta geometries within the electrostatic field that creates the bi-directional forces of charge interactions.

*Where two similar coupled equilateral energy momenta fields combine an electrostatic field is created.*

*Where two opposite coupled equilateral energy momenta fields combine a magnetic dipole is created.*

The arrangement and asymmetry of Planck quantum charges with in any EM field determines the motion and acceleration of charged particles within the field of electrostatic force.

The classical forces of attraction should be renamed forces of interaction (as they result from bidirectional quantum vector forces).

All electromagnetic fields are comprised of a squared number of equilateral Planck energy momenta quanta (whose asymmetrical distribution of equilateral Planck quanta results in a net divergent Force) with a convergent vector force component.

When modeled with equilateral Planck geometries electromagnetic fields follow the Biot-Savart Law:

Rhombic electric fields follow the inverse squared law of propagation

Equilateral magnetic fields follow the inverse squared law of propagation

Magnetic dipole fields follow an inverse cubed law of propagation

The equilateral geometry of quantised angular momentum creates chirality at the quantum level in physics (rotation does not affect the charge of plank quanta, but mirroring and/or spatial coordinate translations do).

All positive charged fields can be modeled as having a clockwise inductive flux geometry. All negative charged fields can be modeled as having an anti-clockwise inductive flux geometry (with OMEGA representing equilateral geometries per second and PI reflecting their scalar areas).

All W bosons are comprised of an odd number of equilateral Planck quanta in a trapezoidal geometry.

All Z bosons are comprised of an even number of equilateral Planck quanta in a dual-trapezoidal geometry (neutral Z bosons are equivalent in terms of Planck mass energy momenta to photons save their net geometry).

*All charged fascia [Higgs bosons] are comprised of squared numbers of equilateral Planck quanta in an equilateral geometry.*

The odd quanta Z bosons within electromagnetic fields form quantum levels of charged mass-energy momenta.

The Planck equation [E=n.hv] of quantised energy is a generalized equation of Planck geometries (and applies to all energy momenta arrangements equally).

Bosons and Quantum levels are a transverse measure of mass energy momenta in EM fields.

Photons are a longitudinal measure of mass energy momenta within the same electromagnetic fields.

**Equilateral Planck energy momenta per second [E/c^2] equates to mass geometries.**

**Equilateral Planck energies momenta per second squared [E/c^4] equates to Matter topologies.**

Interactive **mass energy geometries** can combine via the weak force to form standing wave Matter topologies.

Standing wave **Matter topologies** can combine via the strong force to form elementary subatomic particles.

The fundamental Matter quantum of all physics is the Tetryon (a tetrahedral mass-energy Matter topology) which is formed from photons of electrostatic energy and can be found as positive, neutral or negative charges topologies.

These three forms of charged Tetryons form the foundation of all the physical Matter of our universe as they seek a state of equilibrium, Tetryons are not spherical point charges – they are tetrahedral, likewise the subatomic particles they form are not spherical point charges - they are [T] - Tetryonic charge topologies.

The Tetryonic topologies created by Tetryons as they combine to form elementary particles creates new forms of closed volume topologies that follow Euler’s characteristic [V+F-E = 2] for Platonic solids.

**Quarks and leptons are comprised of 12 charged mass energy geometries
- quarks form [8π] octahedral Matter topologies
- leptons form [12π] dodecahedral Matter topologies.**

...and...

- forming [20π] Icosahedral Matter topologies

-------------------------------

-----------------------------

------------------------------

Rest lepton topologies have a completely neutralized magnetic dipole structure and all leptons (charged or neutral) have identical physical Matter topologies.

Their rest masses are the result of the number of plank quanta comprising each Matter topology with applied forces creating additional asymmetrical KEM fields resulting in kinetic energies, magnetic moments and vector velocities of motion.

As the energies of motion are added to equilateral KEM fields the Planck quanta themselves are physically WAVE-length Lorentz contracted.

Matter topologies are Lorentz invariant to velocity changes (or acceleration) The relativistic distortion of spherical point charges in physics is no longer applicable, in turn undermining a basic tenet of special relativity as postulated by Albert Einstein.

These secondary KEM fields of motion also contain the kinetic EM energies and vector [square root] linear momentum of material particles in motion - the mass energy momenta density and physical geometries of Matter topologies is unaffected by applied forces or changes to velocity-momenta.

The changing Lorentz contracted mass energies of kinetic EM fields contributes to the total relativistic mass energy of Matter topologies but in no way changes the mass energy distribution of the Matter component of particles in motion itself - leading in turn to varying generations of subatomic particles with in the particle families themselves.

The net asymmetric KEM field geometry of each particles in motion is reflective of the charged distribution of the Matter topology of the particle itself.

Mesons are created when quark and anti-quark particles combine via the strong force interaction between their charged fascias to create unique 14 pi Matter topologies. (neutral or charged pions)

These strong interactions between opposite charge fascia of material particles and the resulting Matter topologies are evidence of the fact that Matter-antimatter combinations do not necessarily result in the explosive annihilation of the particles concerned. (in fact the combining of opposite charge quarks is a necessary step in the formation of the baryons)

All Baryons are Matter topologies created from the combination of tri-quark topologies The quark's combine via their opposite charged [Higgs] fascia to create neutral and charged elementary topologies.

Due to this opposite charge interaction the charged distribution of baryonic topologies does not follow the textbook given arrangements of [UUD] & [DDU] instead they are arranged as follows:

Neutrons = DOWN + UP + DOWN

anti-Neutrons = anti-DOWN + anti-UP + anti-DOWN

anti-Protons = anti-UP + anti-DOWN + anti-UP

Protons and neutrons are revealed to have quark arrangements that are mirror symmetries of each other, revealing the neutral charge neutron to have a complementary negative charge arrangement to that of protons.

The increased Planck mass energy contents of various families of quarks facilitates the creation of a huge number of possible Baryon topologies resulting in the particle zoo of subatomic elements created in particle collisions within accelerator experiments - all of these elements can be easily modeled and accounted for using Tetryonic mass-energy Matter topologies.

Additionally, the particles often referred to as gluons within the standard model can be easily accounted for and explained as being neutral Tetryons within Tetryonic theory - where these neutral charge Matter topologies form a neutral Matter dielectric between charged Tetryons to facilitate the strong force interaction and the formation of larger particles.

Neutral Tetryons (gluons) can also form particles in their own right (neutrinos and glue-balls), as can charged Tetryons (charge-ball particles), most of which are short lived.

Tetryonics reveals the previously hidden geometry and topology of electromagnetic fields and subatomic particles and the geometric relationship and interplay between electric permittivity and magnetic permeability within all EM field that results on the speed of light in any medium.

As well as the revealing a geometric source of all physical constants within physics itself, Tetryonic charge geometries show the weak force to be a magnetic dipole [edge] interaction between mass energy geometries and Matter topologies and the strong force to be a charge [fascia] interaction between Matter topologies themselves.

The equilateral [quantised angular momentum] of inductive Planck mass energy geometries within squared [HIGGS] fascia of Matter topologies is what creates inertial properties of Matter at the quantum level.

The strong force between charged parallel Higgs fascia of Matter topologies results in 'hidden' partitions of mass energy with in the Matter topologies of quark's and baryons leading to the inability of mathematics online to accurately model and understand the physics of creating these particles at the quantum level.

Tetryonic charged mass energy geometries allows for the accurate 2D and 3D modeling of all Matter topologies and fields of Force interactions within physics.

It reveals that the deuterium atom [not the hydrogen atom] is the quantum building block of all elementary Matter - the unique charge topology of deuterium (consisting of a proton, neutron and electron) can be related to the electromechanical topology and function of quantum synchronous converters.

These quantum synchronous converters absorb and emit mass energies via the rotating electrons [quantum rotors] bound to the nuclei by way of radiant bosons and photons [heat and light].

The net charge of Deuteron nuclei facilitates their binding together to form helium and larger atoms, while stored mass energy quanta within their Matter topology results in raised quantum grounds states that can all be modeled mathematically using Schrodinger’s wavenumbers.

The simpler geometric charge topology reveals visually how the mass energy content of baryons directly affects the angular momentum and energy levels of photo electrons bound to atomic nuclei, in turn revealing that larger elements be created in two ways - namely by the addition of a neutron to a Hydrogen atom (as classically modeled in modern chemical physics) or through the raising of Planck mass-energy quanta within the deuterium Matter topology itself.

Deuterium nuclei without any bound photo-electrons form quantum batteries with EM mass energies can be stored indefinitely without being released.

These nuclei can be arranged atomically in either a series, parallel or empty parallel configuration each of which affects the ground energy states of the respective nuclei created.

Where photo-electrons (quantum rotors) are attracted and bind to these nuclei (quantum batteries) the stored mass energies can then be released in a controlled manner via spectral line emissions, or energy can be added via spectral line absorption.

As photo-electrons are bound to the deuteron nuclei the energy levels are affected directly by the mass energy levels of the nuclei that they bind to, in turn affecting their KEM field energies.

The square root linear momentum of KEM field energies normally creates a vector motion but in the case of bound electrons this vector motion is turned into an angular motion resulting in electron spin within the nucleus.

The direction of the spin is always reference with respect to the nuclear magnetic moment resulting in up and down electron spins and their associated magnetic dipole moments.

The kinematics of KEM fields provides an easy visual explanation of Newton's 2nd law of motion: namely that deceleration can be seen as the removal of odd number quanta from the squared kinetic energy fields and acceleration can be viewed as the addition of odd numbered quanta to squared kinetic energy fields.

The addition or subtraction of odd numbered Planck quanta from squared energy fields results in changing square root linear momentum for the particles that these fields are associated with - this changing linear momentum over time can be equated to acceleration leading to Newton's formulation of Force = mass x acceleration [F = ma = dp/t = dmv/t].

Using the equilateral geometry of Planck's constant we can now unify classical mechanics with quantum mechanics and reveal the underlying dynamics of relativistic mass energies of motion. (as well is providing an electromechanical explanation of inertia in the physics of Matter in motion)

Newton's vector linear momentum [p=mv] forces are revealed to be the geometric square root of Leibnitz's scalar energies [E/mv^2] with their associated inertial mass being a measure of the scalar energies per second [m=E/v^2]

Linear momentum [mv] is differentiated from vector velocities [v] through the equilateral geometry of energy per second [m] in tetryonics, with the total linear momentum of any EM field or system of particles being the vector some of the square root Planck linear momentum of the quanta in the fields comprising the system.

Once the equilateral field geometry of KEM fields is revealed it is easy to show that the total energy of the field [E=mv^2] is the result of the kinetic energies [1/2Mv^2] plus the magnetic moment [1/2Mv^2] of any material topology in motion.

This in turn allows for a rigid geometric differentiation of quantised angular momentum [Ω] in Planck quanta, the linear momentum [p] of any system and the classical angular momentum [vector rotation about a point] in physics.

These geometric definitions of mass energy momenta in physical systems as portrayed in Tetryonic theory reveal a differing geometric relationship to that commonly portrayed in modern physics [i.e. neutralizing right angled Pythagorean triangles].

Additionally Lorentz corrections factors are restricted to planar 2-D mass energies of KEM fields associated to particles in motion where changes of velocity force result in the addition or subtraction of equilateral Planck quanta from the KEM field geometry resulting in the physical expansion or contraction of Planck geometries within the field.

Tetryonic theory's geometric definition and application of quantised angular momentum with respect to mass energy momenta in physics allows for the physical modeling of mass energy and Matter at all scales of physics and their unification of classical, quantum and relativistic mechanics.

The 'squared' energies of quantum mechanics and statistical distributions of the math associated with quantum mechanics is now revealed in an entirely new light facilitating the macro scale modeling of all hitherto unseen quantum particles and processes.

The geometric relationships between charge, mass geometries and Matter topologies is easily visualized and applied to all physics revealing quantised angular momenta [QAM] to be the hidden variable of Planck's constant [h].

The modeling of quantised angular momentum as an equilateral geometry allows for the elimination of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and Bell's inequality from the foundational tenants of quantum mechanics.

Both the position and momentum of particles and fields can be now modeled at any stage of a system's spatio-temporal development and evolution using these simple equilateral charged geometries of mass energy momenta.

Precise rest mass energies of any Matter topology can be calculated from 1st principles allowing for accurate modeling of all quantum systems and even periodic elements - expanding our knowledge of chemical systems and processes.

The Planck-Compton frequency, de Broglie wavelength, absolute rest mass and charge Matter topology of all periodic elements, compounds and molecules can now be calculated with absolute certainty and precision and can be related back to Avogadro's number for all elements in chemistry.

The exponential energy levels of atomic nuclei and atomic processes of energy release can also now be shown to be the result of an underlying geometric Planck scale geometry inherent to all mass energy Matter within physics.

Einstein's mass energy equivalence formula is shown to be a geometric relationship between measurements of energy per second and inertial mass, combined with Tetryonics new definition of Matter as energy per second squared we can now show that Einstein's famous formulation is an incomplete formulation of the mass-ENERGY-Matter relationship that applying only to specific processes within our physical universe.

The Lorentz corrections on which special relativity is based are shown to be WAVE-length and QAM corrections for the changing physical geometries of scalar mass energies per unit of time in spatial co-ordinate systems (c^2)and that additional time-based dimensional analysis must be taken into account in order to define and differentiate between electromagnetic mass and Matter in physics.

The application of squared (equilateral) geometries to physics in the role of quantised angular momentum has been overlooked since the inception of physics itself, but with the inclusion of this geometry a rigid geometric grammar can now be imposed upon the mathematics of physics leading to the correction of many erroneous mathematical assumptions.

**An exact value from first principles for Planck's constant can be calculated and Avogadro's number can be confirmed and related to the absolute rest mass of hydrogen atoms.**

A geometric representation of Coulomb's charged field interactions and the impedance of free space can also be provided for all physical processes allowing for a fast and accurate visualization of energy mechanics at all scales of physics.

*Tetryonic theory’s equilateral charged mass energy and polyhedral Matter topologies allow for the modeling and differentiation of energy in all its forms within any spatial coordinate system providing a vast improvement over relativity's use of stress energy tensors and non-Euclidean geometries in modeling physical systems.*

All fields and particles can be defined and differentiated in terms of their charged mass energy geometries and Matter topologies respectively and the differentiation of elemental families into their generations can be easily accounted for through the addition of mass energies of motion to secondary KEM fields associated with each particle grouping.

Inertial resistance to force can be modeled and explained through the equilateral geometry of quantised angular momentum when viewed as an electromechanical equivalent to an inductive loop of energy.

Electromagnetic inertial mass can now be clearly defined as a measure of the inductive EM energy density of any charged 2D planar Planck geometry in any spatial co-ordinate system of measurement.

3D Matter can now be viewed and modeled as the closed topology created by 2D mass energies through charge interactions in any spatial co-ordinate system of measurement per second squared.

**Additionally physical terms such as 'mass-less' particles are shown to be a misnomer as any field or particle must by definition contain energy per unit of time - and should be more appropriately re-termed Matter-less or weightless particles.**

Tetryonics defines, differentiates, and unifies energy in all its forms (mass, Matter & Force) through the equilateral geometry of quantised angular momentum at the quantum level, allowing for the development of a unified field equation that models physics on all scales and reveals a common geometric thread to all the disparate fields of physics that to date have defied unification.

Equilateral (SQUARED) energy fields of Planck quanta comprised of statistical distributions of (ODD) transverse bosons and (EVEN) longitudinal photons account for all the quantum mechanical processes of physics including EM field geometries and material particle topologies and electron spin.

Principle quantum levels [1st Schrodinger wave-numbers] are shown to be the result of the series addition of deuterium nuclei in atomic elements with their resulting energy levels determining the squared energy levels of bound photoelectron KEM fields – in turn forming the foundation of discrete quantum jumps of electrons bound to atomic nuclei.

The bound photo-electron can only transition between allowed squared energy levels permitted by the energy levels of deuterium nuclei to which they are bound and once free from the atomic nuclei the electron can emit or absorbed a continuous spectra of light photons - but while bound to the deuterium nuclei in atoms it can only have specific [squared] KEM energy levels.

The complex, asymmetric tri-quark (9 tetryon) Matter topology of baryons directly affects the magnetic moment of protons and neutrons in motion making them considerably weaker than the symmetric axial Bohr magnetron of electrons in motion.

As the Bohr magneton of photo-electrons is determined by the squared energies of its secondary KEM field confusion has arisen with respect to the allocation of spins to subatomic particles, Tetryonic geometries now correct for this and suggest that the electron historically viewed as a spin 1/2 particle is in fact a spin 3 particle under the formal definitions of spin rotations i.e. rotating at 120° can bring it back to an identical quantum state as the initial state measured].

Again Tetryonic theory and its energy geometries in addition to explaining and correcting electron spins also shows that the term electron spin can now be taken literally when modeled with Tetryonic geometries to provide an accurate description of the origin of magnetic moments for electrons, in turn undermining the foundational postulate of special relativity that these magnetic moments are the result of the distortion of spherical point charges and that relativistic Lorentz contractions apply to Matter topologies.

Dirack's constant, or Planck's reduced constant [h/2π], is revealed to be a measure of the electric permittivity of a relativistic electron's KEM field, and the measurement of the associated magnetic dipole of the same KEM field results in the mistaken concept of 1/2 spins in the measurement of Bohr magnetons.

The magnetic vector created by the Bohr magneton [or KEM field dipole] when measured with respect to the nuclear magneton [Proton magnetic moment] produces either a higher energy [parallel] or lower energy [anti-parallel] state for all atomic nuclei.

It is the arrangement of these parallel or anti-parallel magnetic dipoles within atomic nuclei that determines the exact frequency-wavelength (energy level) of emitted spectral lines with the interaction of a particle’s magnetic dipole moment with external electromagnetic fields creating Lorentz forces.

As electrons and protons have identical quantum Matter topologies [elementary charges] but differing mass energy contents the electron is able to create a much larger secondary KEM field (with associated magnetic dipole moment) for the same velocity [1/2Mv^2].

The energy level differences created by the parallel or anti-parallel spin coupling of electrons with protons or deuterium nuclei within atomic elements creates the hyperfine splitting and Zeemen effects observed and spectral lines.

As the electron is now shown to be a complex non-spherical particle topology when it binds with protons to form hydrogen the unique Matter topology of both the proton and the electron [Hydrogen] create a small but detectable precession in the motion of the spinning electron as compared to that of the motion of the same electron in a deuterium nuclei.

Additionally, as all periodic elements, compounds and molecules are comprised of deuterium nuclei (not hydrogen as currently supposed) the orientation and spin direction of electrons bound within these nuclei results in the diamagnetic and paramagnetic properties of various macro-scale materials.

Tetryonics theory reveals that the mass charge ratio is of particles are measure of the constituent mass energy geometries that go into making the particle's final Matter topology that we observe a measure.

But unlike the current mathematical approach the geometric approach of Tetryonics reveals the hidden mass energy partitions within the Matter topology of all subatomic particles and that particles such as tetryons (the quantum building blocks of all Matter) are in fact hidden within the debris of current collider results.

**4 quantum charge tetryons have the same1/3 partial elementary charge as some quarks, and can be measured as having the same mass charge ratio's as charged leptons such as positrons and electrons in collider experiments.
To be continued [QED, Chemistry, Cosmology, Mathematics, Biology and economic theory] - ABRAHAM [2014]**

There a number of issues raised here: Via K.C. Abraham

1. The Primer field model of interactions, and their bowls in particular, only model the M-fields of the interactions taking place – a common problem with most experimentalists. If you look at their toroidal shaped fields and realize they are only models of M-fields you’ll notice that they match the equilateral m-fields of Tetryonics but fail to model the e-field energy that they are applying to them in order to achieve their results.

2. That said they still remain an accurate model of the processes [albeit only half the picture]

3.Current theories struggle in many ways to account for the creation and evolution of our Universe in light of the currently observed features – the largest problem they have and the most conveniently skipped over is the FTL problem of Inflation – FTL is impossible under the tenets of relativity theory, yet it is the core mechanism for inflation the bed rock of the current model of how the Universe got to have such an homogenous CMBR radiation pattern.

4. The CMBR results from an ‘almighty’ electrical discharsge from two electrodes with the longitudinal waves produced reaching out between the electrodes to collide and interact within a region between the two electrodes concerned.

5. This is the only way to produce Matter and forces in the early Universe, as you delve into Tetryonic theory in depth you will note a number of key points that firmly point to the above scenario being the most plausible mechanism for the creation of our Universe.

6. Light itself can be easily formed from the same discharge process along with Matter. [but the reverse is not true nor possible, Matter cannot be created from Light or EM waves].

7. All Matter is created from Electrostatic discharges – neutral photons and EM waves have charge arrangements that are in-correct for forming Matter – so a DC discharge is how you form Matter not from light.

8. The energy density of these primordial discharges is high enough to produce FTL velocities under E=mv^2 geometries and to result in inflation where the Vacuum energies and light produced will initially propagate at >c for a period of time and then ‘slow’ down to c when the energy densities permit.

9. The interactions that create the Matter component of our Universe are the result of longitudinal energy momenta slamming into each other at various angles – only longitudinal waves produce physical forces [Tesla] and these forces create Matter, EM fields and gravity in the nascent Universe.

10. As time progresses the region of interaction will grow in size [the Universe expands] to fill empty regions of space creating SOME of the observed CMBR pattern – this CMBR pattern can also be heavily influenced by localised regions of creation

11. If a solar system [ours] was created later we would observe the CMBR pattern only by viewing it through the local MBR bubble produced by the creation of our Solar system – any attempt to model the CMBR without taking these effects into account just leads to erroneous models and predictions – to date there have be 4 [FOUR] math models that predicted the CMBR energy level [temperature] each one was proclaimed the most accurate model possible until measures returned temperatures that differed from the model – at which point the model was re-adjusted and proclaimed to be the most accurate model again.

12. Fiddling with math to match an observed outcome is not science – it is fiddling – and should never be done. Tetryonics has littered Science with the remains of such work that has lead physics to many an erroneous conclusion – atomic models, relativity theory, gravity, the role of charge and the geometry of energy itself are but a few that come quickly to mind.

13. The Ying-Yang geometry is simply a well-known symbol that can be utilized to convey a basic message of how the Universe was created, many others are no doubt possible as well – the truth of the matter (as I see it) is far more prosaic, to make a Universe all you need is enough equilateral Planck energies compressed into two points and a region of empty space in which it can expand. Dollard has done similar experiments and noted mini-galaxies and stars in light bulbs as a result of large voltages discharges into them.

Other important points to consider.

1. Primer is experimentally based – Tetryonics is theory based.

2. Both can aid and expand on the work of each other and in fact this should be encouraged if possible

3. There is a case of strong agreement between Tetryonic theory and the Primer field experimental results.

4. We congratulate him in using EM discharges as this is where Tetryonic Theory shows our future advances lie in energy generation and resource creation.

5. Obviously his focus has been on practical results while our focus is on developing and refining a theory and one that shows great promise in expanding David's work to date.

6. Tetryonic Theory can greatly expand his understanding of the plasma physics of the discharges that he is working with presently, in turn enabling the rapid development of new experimental designs.

7. In fact, Tetryonic theory has many discharge designs that can be readily provided to further his experimental work on discharge plasmas etc.

8. CAD modeling of equilateral E&M fields shows that the electrode designs he has found effective [and was utilizing in the videos] are fully reflective of Tetryonic M field geometries, leaving scope to expand on his current theoretical modeling and suppositions through the inclusion of Tetryonic Field Theory.

9. Obviously there is scope to develop the E-field components of the fields as this is where Tesla found much application. This is where real physical forces can be easily created and real horsepower can be transmitted over great distances near-instantaneously [as Tesla noted]

10. It is only current science’s fixation on electrical oscillations & transverse waves that creates our current impediment to many new technologies that can be rapidly developed and made available to all.

11. I couldn’t agree more with his statement that practical outcomes are a necessary step – but equally, so is a solid understanding of the physics involved from a theoretical stand point. Some development of a theoretical understanding of the results and its application to current sciences was attempted in his videos but found only limited success as key pieces of theory were missing, namely that of the equilateral geometries of Planck energies and the theoretical advances made possible by Tetryonics Theory’s geometric approach to electrical energies and physics in general.

12. From a mutual understanding of each other’s work an even greater understanding can be developed as from my point of view presently there is much in common.

13. Finally, his theory being ‘limited’ to M-field at present and Tetryonics can reveal much more about the interaction dynamics taking place than he is theoretically aware of at present.”

=====

]]>Connecting the dots between Wayne Roberts Scale Structure Theory to that of Tetryonics 'Square Numbers' in Physics, I hope to show that this new way of looking at the universe is valid and expressive in ways we need to recognize and appreciate. The future is here, right now, and we are the ones we've been waiting for.

"What exactly is a unit? And, by implication, a number? And how might these abstract concepts be best represented or symbolized within the jurisdiction of a language of which they form the parts? Is an 'intuitive knowing' (axiom) called for? A 'given' which must forever remain 'incompletely definable' (here alluding to Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem) because the concept of the unit lies at the heart of definitions themselves, and therefore any definition of itself must surely, ipso facto, be tautologous? We must remember that all things in our Universe (including 'definitions') are relative as required by the Principle of Universal Relativity —nothing is 'cut off' or separated, else it remains unknowable, neither may it 'influence' or 'be influenced'."--Roberts

Preface from http://www.principlesofnature.net

"There seems little doubt we are on the threshold of a rich new expressive means in the arts and of powerful new theories in science. The adoption and further exploration of the principles outlined below may lead to the development of a highly sophisticated language—one that might be understood universally. This is because such a language would reflect universal organization in principle. Such a universal language could extend the potential for expression and communication far beyond what we currently know as art or language. The gradual elucidation of scale structures together with syntactical exploration and interconnection of these will result in the discovery of not only a powerful expressive means but also a high-order language with the ability to extend science and art, in fact thinking itself, to a level we might only dream of today.

The challenge for the new art is not only to discover resonant scale structures and syntaxes but to apply and combine these to form a new language of visual forms and events. The sign that we are on the right track in our quest will be that the new syntax and scale structures connect up in exquisite ways with many existing covert scale structures within mathematics, music, topology, linguistics, and the natural world. Ultimately, the new language will embrace them all. Then we shall know ourselves, each other, and the universe more fully.

This document is therefore but a beginning; an outline of the principles of new ways of thinking, creating, exploring. It presents a new frontier, a new challenge. My hope is that it advances not only the cause of art, but of how we think, and of what we can know. The theory stands upon the shoulders of many giants of the past, bringing together their history-making breakthroughs within a single schema. Thus the theory is both new and old. It is new in what it brings together and in how it is brought together. In addition, new concepts are proposed and these are then applied to the foundations of geometry and number theory including Pythagoras' theorem. But it is a newness that builds upon the foundation of the individual achievements of many others; a consciousness not only of human history, but of the human discovery of cosmic origins, timescales, and orders. Finally, the document presents a number of conjectures arising from the theory, and whether these are someday proven true or partly true is perhaps less important than whether the general premise of the ideas here presented proves to be valuable to peoples or persons now or in the future."

If not us, who? If not now, when?

"Every one of our laws is a purely mathematical statement using rather complex and abstruse mathematics. It's successes have fostered a tendency to forget that mathematics is NOT physics."--Abraham

We are looking at numbers from a Tetryonic perspective and connect these concepts to that of Scale Structure Theory (Wayne Roberts). We are attempting to highlight the notion that 'Square Numbers' are in fact Equilateral Triangular Geometries. The nature of Units is also called into question whereby a re-definition of the unit is necessary in order to advance our understanding of physical systems. Only when these concepts are accepted can we delve deeper into the erroneous assumptions made by the Standard Model, setting it on a path correction leading to unforeseen advances in many areas of study. By applying Equilateral Geometry to numbers, mass , Energy and Matter, a new level of understanding and a new road map for the future of science is offered.

Wayne Roberts suggests that these principles will assist to develop a new visual language leading to new ways to think about our universe. Tetryonics goes a step further and demonstrates that this is in fact true. By applying the notion of 'Square numbers' to Equilateral Triangular Geometries, Tetryonics offers a new visual language confidently resting upon the firm foundations of Geometry.

"If math is the language of Physics, then Geometry is the grammar that the math must follow."K.C.ABRAHAM

If you relate the concept of a numerical ‘Integer’ to that of a geometric energy ‘quantum’ you’ll find it's a better way of defining it as Tetryonics does in Quantum Mechanics Book One, concerning introductory math & throughout T[5] – Geometrics.

Best definition we can give is “Square numbers are in fact EQUILATERAL geometries.” This covers it all because squares are equilateral just as equilateral triangles are. In fact we’d love to just drop ‘square numbers’ from our vernacular but it is deeply ingrained [just like dodecahedrons being hexagonal etc.]. We take care to place quotes around 'square numbers' because English just isn't descriptive enough in this area, and the reference word, square, has lead us to looking at actual squares rather than realizing that the tessellation of Equilateral Geometries produce all the square numbers of physics.

Introducing the concept of a Tetryonic 'integer' unit.

The 'Omega' unit:

- The name and symbol reflect the equilateral geometry and EM field flux of all quanta

- Its foundational units would be Pi radians

- Combined with mass [Energy/sec] it gives Planck’s Constant [h] in physics

- Its geometry [m^2] per second reflects the unit of quantised angular momentum [QAM]

One ‘integer’ Omega unit is Pi radians and provides the geometric foundation for all of Physics.

The Tetryon forms the Matter quanta in physics, so we find it useful to keep everything in units of [pi] for Tetryonics. If someone was to work exclusively with EM photons [Light] no doubt it could be used to used to create an integer unit for that work [ie Photon = 2pi E] but again the results obtained would then have to be all converted back to [pi] geometries and formula so as to present their work in a base unit.

What we are trying to convey here is that 2pi [TAU] bases relate specifically to Photons – while there remains a need to express final results in terms of pi [Charge] or [4pi] Matter units for true equivalence throughout physics.

Using TAU & PI bases without a full understanding of the geometry will lead to a result similar to the Planck-Einstein one where it is often stated in textbooks that hv= E = hf . Mathematically that's the same as saying 2 =1, or Even = Odd and therefor must be corrected from this point forward, and all modern text books need to be re-written with that in mind.

While we support the premise of Tau, it too is short-sighted and fails when it comes to providing an appropriate base unit for Physics in general.

The following is the best summation of the geometric bases:

The Charged [ODD pi] geometry of 2-D [npi] mass – ENERGY [pi] - Matter [4npi]

It helps to maintain the units and equations reflective of the number of sides each particle and field has.

Specifically:

Bosons ODD pi 2D mass charge geometries

Photons EVEN pi 2D mass tau geometries

Tetryons 4pi 3D Matter Tetryonic geometry

Quarks-Lepton 12pi 3D Matter Dodecadeltahedron geometries

Mesons 24pi 3D Matter Dual -Dodecadeltahedron

Baryons 36pi 3D Matter Tri - Dodecadeltahedron

Elements 84pi 3D Matter Elemental

The [base] unit here is obviously [pi] geometries which are the radian geometries formed by QAM [OMEGA].

**To Be Continued....**

]]>

]]>

]]>

It was Nikola Tesla who first expressed these words in 1931, and since then science has strived to realize the goal of understanding and controlling energy in all its forms in turn developing a source of clean, limitless energy that would free humanity from the limited, polluting technologies of the present.

We have made great strides in advancing our understanding of the electrical sciences over the past century since these words were written, and we have delved deep into the very structure of Matter itself, only to find that at the core of our understanding lie roadblocks that stymie our progress in the quest for sustainable sources of energy that mirror the simplistic process found in nature.

At the heart of our current problems in understanding the physics of Nature is our ability to define and differential between mass & Matter, even Energy itself on a geometric basis. Until we are able to do so, our attempts to mathematical model the process at work, on all scales of physics, will remain hopelessly abstract and filled with assumptive errors of math born from a top-down approach attempting to understand the physics of immaterial fields and material particles.

A new bottom-up approach has been devised wherein the charged geometry of Planck energy momenta itself resolves the current mathematical impasses into elegant geometric solutions reflective of the true quantum nature and mechanics of energy on all scales of physics.

With these charged 2d planar geometries and 3D topologies we can at last ‘see’ the immaterial quantum world of mass-energies and model, in exquisite detail, all the field interactions that take place unseen to us, and that give rise to nuclear Forces and fields of physical interaction.

The quantised angular momenta [QAM] of Planck’s constant is revealed to be nothing more than a reflection of the planar equilateral geometry inherent to energy momenta at the quantum level, a property that gives rise to new definitions of 2d mass-energy geometries and 3D Matter Topologies; allowing for visual and tactile manipulation of Energy and particles to be conducted for the first time in history.

We can model the formation of particles of Matter from fields of energy momenta and see how charged topologies interact with each other via interactive fields of Force, in turn leading us to new insights into the true nature of physics and a rapidly advancing understanding of the true mechanics of the Universe, hinted to us by Tesla and dreamt of by so many ever since.

With an advanced understanding of quantum fields and particle dynamics comes new insights into the charged topology of elements themselves, and finally, a completely new picture of the forces and processes at work in Stars.

The ‘fusion’ of elements in stars is shown to no longer be the process by which stars liberate energy at their cores. Just as Mendeleev’s periodic table of elements can now be replaced by a far more accurate table modeled on the quantum charge topology of each and every element with its associated quantum numbers and electron configurations, the process by which stars convert Matter into radiant mass-energies can be finally revealed through Tetryonic theory leading us to grasp the physical mechanics at work in the stars and put this knowledge to work for us here on Earth.

The ‘work-wheel’ that powers the solar system is laid bare for all to see and we can at last correct our mistakes and begin anew to focus our efforts in a direction that will yield a limitless, non-polluting source of energy that can free us from the exploitation of finite resources [and the wars we fight over them]. No longer will national boundaries be a source of contention over access to energy sources and neither will the technologies.

With energy constraints removed we can at last strive for loftier goals than mere survival at the expense of others around us and the impoverishment of our Planet. We can at last make great strides in providing a basic standard of equality for all where energy, food, education and understanding are the hallmarks of Humanity’s progress.

We can set to work restoring great waterways to their natural states and remove pollutants and other bio/radiological wastes from our environment forever by harnessing the process of Matter-Energy conversion in all its forms like nature intended.

We can release the stored mass-energies of Matter to provide us with heat, light and horsepower anywhere we chose and store it safely in a non-radioactive form or even convert excess energies back into any element we choose for use in industries.

Crops can be fertilized using Nitrogen and Potassium created directly from energy itself and nurtured with pure water made from the destruction of radioactive wastes not the damming of rivers and their sources over geo-political borders.

Safe energy storage and release using devices modeled on the quantum topology and electrodynamics of Deuterium nuclei to power cell-phones, cars, homes and industry with endless amounts of electrical energy and new means of transmitting vast amounts of electrical energy over huge distances without the need for transmission lines as well as improved medicines, treatments and even cures based on, and developed from 3D CAD models of atoms, compounds, molecules and biological processes; are but a few of the exciting new possibilities now within our grasp technologically.

As Tesla hinted to us at the turn of the last century it is only through understanding the mechanics of immaterial fields of Force on material objects that these technologies can be glimpsed as solutions to our needs. The challenge we face is to accept and understand what comes naturally to the physics of our Universe and to give up on old wasteful ways that are squandering finite resources at an alarming rate.

Already our planet is groaning under the weight of humanity’s ever increase population and species are disappearing every day as we search for more oil and more space to fuel and feed our ever increasing demands for a better life for a growing population, this is our sole chance to take a stand, to show that we really are an advanced species capable of mimicking nature and changing our ways so that for the first time in history this generation can actually leave the planet a better place for all who share it and come after us.

This is not a fruitless dream of an ideologue who cannot step up himself and contribute to the discussion and progress toward these aims. Already 5 eBooks totaling 1,500 pages have been produced and published with another in the works and practical experimentation has commenced on the basic design of the devices mentioned limited only by funding and the hours available in a day, in due course I hoped to be joined in these effort by many others all of whom will contribute expertise and skills to the tasks at hand and help bring this vision of the future forward to fruition.

There is not a single aspect of human civilization that is not untouched by this advance in knowledge and understanding of the geometric quantum interactions of equilateral Planck quanta.

So what does it take you may well ask to realize this visions of clean, limitless energy and a rejuvenated planet released of the burdens of support human life? Not as much as you might first think, the basic engineering and electrical technologies have existed since the 1900’s when DC discharges were in vogue having been invented by Sir Humphry Davy a century earlier. Sadly with the discovery of the photoelectric effect and solid-state devices scientific study switched away from the work-wheels of nature and focused instead on mathematical extrapolations amidst the rise and success of quantum mechanics and relativistic theory.

With this new interpretation of the quantum geometry of electrical energies and the practical insights the theory offers many rapid advances in technology can be realized on many scientific fronts, once the basic geometry is explained and understood by those involved.

This is not an esoteric theory without substance – it is rooted in the rigidity of equilateral, geometric topologies that provides results matching our current observations while offering new insights in quantum theory and where the mathematics went astray from reality….

“If math is the language of physics, equilateral geometry is its grammar.”

Armed with this new geometric interpretation and explanation of all aspects of physics and electrical theory we can move our scientific focus and funds from unrealizable attempts at power generation to scalable, practical solutions that can be employed by nations and communities anywhere around the World.

The dream of ‘fusion’ energy is at an end to be replaced with the practical realization of Pinch technologies developed directly from Tetryonic theory itself and modeled on the processes of Nature.

No longer will nations or peoples be reliant on coal fired, hydro-electric or non-base load energy solutions, instead as a species we can all migrate to a source of energy that comes from the elimination of harmful waste Matter in all its forms and finally duplicate what nature offers as the ultimate solution to our energy needs; the unlimited 100% efficient Matter-energy conversion and resource creation – a new paradigm is at hand and I encourage all to investigate Tetryonic theory and the solutions it offers to our current way of life.

Join our growing online communities and become part of the solution today.

www.facebook.com/tetryonics

https://plus.google.com/communities/101091059990562251330

]]>

http://holoversity.eu/kelvin.abraham/interviews/Kelvin%20Abraham%201%20-%20Who%20is.mp3

http://holoversity.eu/kelvin.abraham/interviews/Kelvin%20Abraham%202%20-%20Quest.mp3

http://holoversity.eu/kelvin.abraham/interviews/Kelvin%20Abraham%203%20-%20Findings.mp3

http://holoversity.eu/kelvin.abraham/interviews/Kelvin%20Abraham%204%20-%20Sharing.mp3

]]>Check it out! The Geometry of Tetryonics

]]>Tetryonics shines new light on the Golden number, also known as the Divine Proportion or the Golden Ratio.

Providing a geometric understanding of this number, it’s clear that the golden ratio is actually an intrinsic property of energy and photons.

Humanity has struggled to sufficiently explain the origins of this ratio in reality and now the relationship can be intuitively understood according to a geometric basis.

Although an inscribed equilateral triangle within a circular boundary is well know, it being representative of mass itself is not. Also the fact that the geometry of a photon highlights the Phi ratio is something no one else has yet to explicitly reveal.

Some key points mentioned below:

Tetryonic geometry reveals the maximum E-field amplitude of the reduced Planck constant to be an example of the Golden ratio in Physics.

The Area of the E-field permittivity diamond [ALDM] produced by the golden ratio bisector is ½ the area of the original equilateral Planck Triangle [ABC].

Applying the golden ratio to quantum scale electrodynamic geometry we can quickly determine that the linear momentum and magnetic moment vectors of photons and EM waves can also be expressed as a golden ratio.

]]>

Lee Smolin, in "The Trouble with Physics" highlights the difficulty independent researchers face when he states; “Science requires a balance between rebellion and respect…but there is no balance in the current academic world. More than at any time in the history of science, the cards are stacked against the revolutionary. Such people are not tolerated in the research universities.”

Anyone who follows or has a career in physics, will know something or other about the CERN facility. Last year CERN proclaimed from the rooftops the long awaited news that they had finally identified the Higgs Boson. This article attempts to call out this multi-billion dollar charade by offering an alternative hypothesis. Have these scientists been going on and on about the proverbial Higgs Boson while not knowing the least thing about it? If so, how could something like that happen you ask? Well, I would like to introduce to you a friend of mine, KC Abraham.

"Many scientists find it hard to believe that the investigators who constructed the currently accepted theories could have made so many mistakes. It should be emphasized, therefore, that the profusion of conflicts between present-day ideas and our findings does not indicate that the previous investigators have made a multitude of errors. What has happened is that they have made a few serious errors that have had a multitude of consequences."--KC Abraham of Tetryonic Theory

Tetryonics offers humanity an alternative model of physics that has a simple and straightforward approach. In the truest sense of the phrase, KC Abraham, single-handedly resolves virtually all of the quandaries dumbfounding mainstream science today. Abraham claims to have found what CERN is looking for, yet CERN continues with their deceptive announcements and "achievements" concerning the Higgs Boson. Let me be first to inform you, that these guys are peddling the worst kind of dogma.

What Abraham has discovered is something nobody else has yet to identify. The magnitude of this discovery is initially difficult to communicate, however in order to understand this alternative model of physics, all you need is to grasp a few single concepts.

Tetryonics itself has 3 main laws.

1) Energy itself is equilateral.

2) The law of interaction and all energy in what ever form it is will seek equilibrium.

3) Once the system is in motion and it's seeking equilibrium, it will continue indefinitely as it cycles through it's various forms backwards and forwards.

The next foundational concept to understand would then be; "If maths is the language of Science, geometry is its grammar."

What T-Theory is suggesting is that math can model many systems, however without the proper knowledge of the "grammar" that math should use, our scientific community and mathematicians are grasping at straws and cannot put the math into it's proper perspective. This is how strange ideas and abstract concepts end up as irrefutable cornerstones of mainstream science. Concepts such as Black Holes, Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, 10 Dimensional Super Gravity, along with String Theory have all been abstracted from our erroneous understanding of math.

As Feynman observed, “Mathematicians…do not even need to know what they are talking about.” The geometric interpretation of the mathematics is important primarily because it is one of the essentials for an understanding of the relationship between mathematics we invent and the physical phenomena it seeks to describe for us. Another important quote from Sir James Jeans is; "The history of theoretical physics is a record of the clothing of mathematical formula which were right, or very nearly right, with physical interpretations which were often very badly wrong."

Currently accepted theories rely on Gaussian formulations, where 4[pi] geometries are assumed to be spherical. Tetryonics clearly shows that the [pi] geometry of energy is an equilateral triangle. As these energy triangles tessellate, they produce the 'square' numbers of physics, which lead to the many mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics.

John Archibald Wheeler describes what he calls the end of physics and mathematics when he states; “To my mind there must be, at the bottom of it all, not an equation, but an utterly simple idea. And to me that idea, when we finally discover it, will be so compelling, so inevitable, that we will say to one another, Oh, how beautiful. How could it have been otherwise?”

Tetryonics is a new theory that; "...effortlessly merges the tested features of Classical mechanics with the statistical probabilities of quantum mechanics and scales up to the cosmological scales of General Relativity." It's the concept of a tangible geometry that trumps the math, that provides a visual expressive language, while first and foremost turning physics into a system of thought.

We all want a deeper level of understanding and truth to rest one's laurels on when attempting to provide the world with new energy solutions. For the first time in history, we have a proper distinction between mass and Matter. Tetryonics uses this single underlying premise to put our known knowledge into the proper perspective. If you are looking for an intuitive way to understand these topics, how exciting is it to realize that you may be holding the next logical progression and expression of humanity's greatest achievements in your hands?

When something new comes to the forefront, it's natural to be skeptical. "To not pause every now and then, take stock of our theories and subject them to a rigorous analysis invites us to wander down blind alleys and cul-de-sacs of experimentation when our resources and efforts could be better utilized elsewhere bettering the Human condition."(Abraham)

Science progresses a single funeral at a time, but new ideas are eventually assimilated. These new discoveries undermine the entire mainstream understanding, and is therefore a threat to those in control of scientific progress at large. The outcropping of such revolutionary understanding is really anybody's guess, but we are suggesting that humanity stands firmly upon a precipice full of possibility. What we do with it in the years to come will surely be an exciting spectacle the world never could have imagined.

To date Tetryonics has advanced much further than what these few short paragraphs will allow, but it is clear that the rigid modeling and answers afforded to Science by this approach opens the door to many new discoveries and opportunities for all of Humanity, including wonders like clean, limitless Energy and unlimited resources.

]]>

Just as changing linear momentum gives us accelerations in time, the changing Charge [mass.time] geometries of Planck quanta at the quantum level within physical systems gives us our perception of change in the macroscopic world with which we create measurements of Time.

Where modern science fails is in its understanding of the physics of Time, it is the result of changes to quantum geometries, it is conservative and 'flows' in one of two directions as a direct result of the inductive flux of quantised energy momenta at the quantum scale [Planck's quanta]... in a circular, not 'linear' direction, that results in our measurements of acceleration, heat, entropy and even relativistic Lorentz corrections to wavelength and frequency of photons of energy momenta.

Equilateral QAM geometry is a foundational physical property of Planck quanta themselves facilitating the creation of charged masses from scalar Energy, all the physical Forces at work & even provides us with colors in our Universe.

Our ability to measure changing QAM geometries gives us our perception of Time.

TIME in physics - is nothing more than a measure of the changing QAM [quantised angular momenta] geometries of all the Planck quanta that make up any physical system in any given spatial co-ordinate system.

d.QAM/c^2 = d.[m^2/s]/[m^2/s^2] = d.s = TIME.

The direction of QAM flux creates CHARGE [mass.sec] at the quantum scale (which is often mistaken for time by relativity theorists) and where additional Planck energy momenta geometries are added to relativistic EM fields about objects its QAM content increases in line with the energy content of the EM field.

d.E = d.hv^2/c^2 = d.m(OMEGA).v^2/c^2 = m.d(QAM).v^2/c^2.

Space-time is a scientific non-sequitur, a mathematical abstraction created to explain relativistic motions and gravitation accelerations.

Space [any spatial co-ordinate system] is separate from Time [d.seconds] in physics which is revealed to be a measure of the changing Planck quanta geometries in any spatial region of measurement.

TIME = [d.QAM/c^2] = d.[m^2/s]*[s^2/m^2] = d.[seconds]

Neither is Quantised Angular Momenta a vector rotation about a point as has been assumed in modern physics - it is in fact a scalar measure of equilateral Planck geometries per second [m^2/s]

In turn revealing CHARGE to be a measure of quantum scale inductive [inertial] mass.seconds - distinct from the causal [entropic] arrow of time as measured and observed on the macro-scale.]]>

Any challenger to the accepted theories of ‘modern’ physics must by definition disagree with the accepted theories and offer alternative hypotheses with which it seeks to improve upon or replace the existing theories – this is how we advance our understanding. Sometimes that knowledge comes in small increments or changes, at other times the changes require a profound re-interpretation and understanding of the countless observations and measurements – this was the case when quantum mechanics was born and remained the case as relativity theory strove to advance our understanding – it remains the case today as Tetryonic theory is presented to the World.

1. You may even consider all Tetryonic illustrations to be a wave-function ‘snapshot’ the system under measurement at any instant of time, IF you define wave-function to encompass all information about any system under measure inclusive of its classical components. However, to date all of physics as failed to define and distinguish between mass-energy & Matter let alone the source and mechanics of Charge at any scale in Physics, resorting instead to nebulous mathematical definitions of the same [such as stress energy tensors and other similar statistical models]. Do not get me wrong here they have served us well as we endeavored to understand what mechanics are at work at the quantum scale and apply equally as well to the largest scale – but they remain non-specific mathematical models of what is really happening at either scale in search of a true foundation on which they can be placed.

2. Accordingly, ANY attempt to describe a quantum system will indeed contain an essential probabilistic element if you are considering the fields themselves [as you should at this scale] but again all the statistical probabilities are derived from the equilateral tessellation of Planck energy momenta in the various charged fields and only represent a portion of the full picture.

3. It is indeed possible to know ALL the information of the system at the same time if you utilize equilateral Planck geometries to model the system’s scalar, quantized and vector components [ala Tetryonics]. Obviously this becomes increasingly complex as you model more and more information in larger and larger systems, but starting from the Planck foundation afforded to us by Tetryonic’s charged geometries it is indeed possible [given sufficient time and computing resource to model the entire universe if you so wished in its finest detail in a completely probabilistic manner].

4. Tetryonic theory reveals there is a wave-particle duality to many experimental systems and models, but not in the terms historically expressed by proponents of the Copenhagen interpretation [or by supporters of quantum indeterminacy in any of its forms]. Such views stem form an inaccurate interpretation of the true source of the probabilities of QM [mainly mass-energy momenta fields, Compton fields etc.] Each system is comprised of 2D equilateral quantum fields of Planck energies [masses] that in turn can create 3D material Matter [the simplest example I can give is the familiar electron in motion – with a 3D electron mass-Matter of 1.2e20 equilateral Planck quanta and a KEM field of [mv^2] mass-energy momenta, both of which can be described either as separate [but inter-related] Matter & mass components of a system under study [or as a complete KEM wave-electron particle system].

Similar to modelling a boat and its associated wake as it moves about, or through a canal system we can model the classical motion of the boat [electron] or measure its wake [interference patterns] as it changes course or moves through docks in the canal. Given a higher level view we may even model and describe both the boat and its wake in turn developing a more complete understanding of all the physics at work [instead of the disparate components].

In either case every piece of information about that system can be completely described and modeled including its associated wave probabilities OR by focusing on one for more aspects of the complete system under study until a more complete understanding can be formulated.

5. And it is here that we must both agree that most measurement devices are macro-scale devices constructed to measure one particular property or another of a system [i.e. its electric field variations, its magnetic field components or its KE/momenta]. What Tetryonic theory does is to allow us to model ALL the energy momenta fields that comprise a system and detail all aspects of the system that any chosen detector will measure [without resorting to indeterminacy]. There are sections in my QM and QED work that show and explain all the inter-related functions of any system [position, scalar mass-energies, linear momentum, angular momenta, vector forces, electric & magnetic field components and mass-ENERGY-Matter distributions] in one geometric illustration as required for each explanation point in question. These measurement devices provide us with information on but one aspect of the system.

6. The reason the correspondence principle works is that even quantum scale particles and fields are all classically defined systems [as illustrated in Tetryonics] with equilateral distributions of Planck mass-energy momenta [that in turn produces a normal distribution when modeled at the quantum field level in every instance] – one begets the other. From 2D equilateral Planck mass-energies we build up 3D Matter through charge interactions and while we may describe a particle classically or through probabilities [depending on the scale and level of detail we wish to examine or model – at any scale 3D Matter will be comprised of normal distributions of equilateral mass-energy momenta and its fields of motion will be likewise; as everything in our Universe [save space itself] is made from equilateral triangular Planck quanta which we can use to model any system.

I realize it is hard to re-train long espoused thoughts on the mechanics driving the quantum world, I too have had to deal with many contrary notions as I plumbed and tested the depths of Tetryonics theory in search of the answers it offers, but please remember every new turning point in scientific discover begins by questioning the accepted wisdom and understanding of its workings.

I do not purport my current version of Tetryonic theory to be THE theory that explains everything as I still have much to do – but to date I have applied it to QM, QED, Chemistry, Cosmology and Mathematics alike and developed an amazingly coherent, geometric theory that provides many new and startling insights into a unified mechanism underlying all these hitherto desperate disciplines of science. An understanding that continues to evolve to this very day.

I do have one word of caution that I offer to all who delve into Tetryonic theory in search of answers to their favorite problems, and that is to begin at the beginning with either QM [or Geometrics] before peeking at the solutions to timeless physics mysteries.

Tetryonic theory is built on the rigidity of equilateral geometry and in its development many small assumptions that have crept into physical sciences have been corrected. It is all too easy to be tempted to sweep it aside because it presents one aspect or another of physics in a completely new and unfamiliar light – this is the foundation of all new theories [and they all require brain re-training at one level of another in order to be understood and applied].

I assure you Tetryonics as coherent and consistent as the geometry that provides its foundation dictates it must be – it affords no speculative assumptions about the quantum fabric of our Universe.

The world is no longer flat, and the many long held barriers have been broken throughout History by those who dared to think a little differently about familiar things – I encourage you to join me and see where it leads.--ABRAHAM]]>

For over a century now Science has advanced at a broken, but ever quickening pace, striving to meet the ever growing needs of our society and the technologies that fuels its growth.

All the time in search of some key piece of information that could unite the disparate disciplines into a unified whole – something that would provide a foundation to our understanding of the source of our Laws of Physics and the Constants of Nature.

The question “What is Electricity?” like the question “What is mass or Matter?” is often claimed to lie outside the realm of physics, belonging instead to that of metaphysics.

It is meaningless to the modern scientist. It is one of the fundamental components of our modern world and perhaps THE most fundamental part of modern physics that we have yet to explain in any meaningful way.

A force that originates in some way from an electric charge, a phenomenon with which the physicists consider themselves reasonably familiar, if only mathematically [its actual physics remain clouded in a quantum shroud of mystery].

The first to hint at foundations of this element was Benjamin Franklin, whose insights were quickly followed by the practical foresightedness of Michael Faraday and the mathematical brilliance of James Clerk Maxwell leading us headlong into our current electrical Age of Technology.

On December 12th 2012 our understanding of the physical Sciences changed forever with the release of the geometric theory of charged mass-ENERGY-Matter [Tetryonics].

In one bold stroke our understanding of the Universe forever changed, with the realization that at the smallest scale imaginable the SQUARE numbers of our physics result from the EQUILATERAL quantum geometry of electromagnetic energy itself.

A trinity where the Electric field is bound by the two poles of a Magnetic dipole within an equilateral geometry and interacts with countless others just like it to form all the Matter and Forces in our Universe.

From the two charged equilateral fascia of the quantum ‘Energy coin’ comes the radiant light that fills our Universe with colour; ceaselessly moving, pausing only to create the Matter that made our Stars, created our Planet and gave life to us.

A single geometry that has lain before our very eyes as we searched for a measure of understanding in the Sciences so we could tap the power that runs the Universe and bend it to our will for our own purposes.

Electricity has ushered in an age that has seen us replace the day-labourer and his horse for a new unseen source of untiring labour – Electricity, which toils for us day and night meeting our needs.

Charge [Q], the basis of electricity is something that scientists and engineers have never been able to bring within their field of comprehension; along with a formalised distinction between the physical properties of mass [m] and Matter [M] that determine the magnitude of the gravitational force [G].

Electromagnetism [and magnetism in particular] is explained as being due to the motion of Electric charges, but as long as the charge itself remained unexplained, the addition of movement did not represent much of an advance to the understanding of quantum source of Electricity and the role it plays in building and powering our Universe.

The physicists have therefore taken force, the phenomenon that they believe they do understand, and developed from it a model of physical reality that fails to provide a clear, coherent explanation for all its observed properties and the phenomena it in turn creates.

Present-day physics have no understanding of the nature of the electric charge. We are simply told that we must not ask; that the existence of electric charges (and the forces they create) has to be accepted as one of the given features of nature, along with the physical constants.

As Feynman observed, “Mathematicians…do not even need to know what they are talking about.” The geometric interpretation of the mathematics is important primarily because it is one of the essentials for an understanding of the relationship between mathematics we invent & the physical phenomena it seeks to describe for us.

While Mathematics is the language of Science – Geometry is its Grammar.

To not pause every now and then, take stock of our theories and subject them to a rigorous analysis invites us to wander down blind alleys and cul-de-sacs of experimentation when our resources and efforts could be better utilized elsewhere bettering the Human condition.

Since the discovery of Electric and Magnetic forces, and their unification with Mathematics we have sought to describe their effects and developed in-numerable electrical technologies that have advanced the standard of living for many across the planet as the electric genie took up the grindstone for us in our technological society and brought us all closer together than ever before.

Imagine what could have been achieved had we a consistent, realistic model of the quantum forces at work that gave rise to the wonder that is electrical energy and could control it at that level.

Only equilateral geometry can unite the duality of electric and magnetic forces that give rise to the known observables and the mathematics that describes them so eloquently - a triangle

This new take on the role of an old and familiar geometry is now presented to the reader so as to reconcile the known observations with the mathematics of physics; in turn uniting the two and correcting the assumptions & errors that have crept in during the nascent development of the Sciences and prejudiced our understanding of this force of Nature to this day.

Within its regular geometry hides a trinity of forces – One Electric and Two Magnetic – each acting in their own directions, but uniting to form a singular geometry that can give substance to our dreams.

This new quantum model of the Universe gives us immediate access to clean, limitless energy as harmful stockpiles of radioactive Matter are converted into radiant heat and light - replacing older carbon fuelled power plants and meeting the energy needs of growing countries while at the same time reducing our carbon footprint on this planet dramatically.

In time, as our knowledge of the atomic structure of elements is developed, we will even be able to convert excess energies back into elements and compounds of our own choosing – the final step in achieving Science’s original dream of the transmutation of elements.

A step that is all too critical to our long-term survival as a technological species; the time of endless consumption of finite resources to meet our ever growing needs is rapidly drawing to a close as our populations increase and our limited resources dwindle through non-sustainable consumption.

We are desperately in need of a new scientific revolution, a technological solution that will allow the exponential growth of our current energy dependent industrial civilization beyond that of the current resource base we have inherited.

A simple solution that can be put into place rapidly and further developed over time; even as it re-writes some of our oldest scientific truths and pre-conceptions along with our mathematics.

Giving us answers to “What is the foundation of our Universe and how does Nature power the Stars and form all the elements that make us?

A doorway into the future has opened, it is up to us to dare peer through it and take our first steps into a new age of Humanity for all – where our Energy and resource needs can, and will be met.

Where we can strive together for the betterment of all species on Earth.

[ABRAHAM]

]]>

2) Geometry is the Grammar that the Math Must Follow.

3) Square numbers are in fact Equilateral [Triangular] Geometries

4) Energy propagating along various axises create SPACE-TIME co-ordinate systems [ie Light creates c^2 space-time co-ordinates [seconds] - & 2 orthogonal beams of light create c^4 space-time [s^2]]. We can equate c^2 to seconds & c^4 to seconds squared for Space-Time co-ordinate systems. This clearly shows the connection between TIME in seconds and SPACE in [c^n directions]

5) EM mass is the 2-d energy content of an equilateral triangle inscribed within the circular time measurement.

6) 3-d Matter is where 4 of these 2-d triangular areas meet to form a standing wave geometries.

7) There is purely empty space inside a Tetryon, which causes a "pressure" gradient.

8) Charge can be positive and negative. Think of this as two different sides to the same coin. [charge is actually determined by the M vector of the magnetic dipole]

9) ‘Square number’ geometries create a broken symmetry [imbalance] of positive & negative quanta in EM fields resulting in charge.

10) Bosons are quantum levels and are comprised of odd number of equilateral triangles. They are transverse EM mass-energies - Planck's quantum.

11) Photons are where two opposite charges come together to form a quantum harmonic oscillator. They are longitudinal EM mass-energies – Einstein’s Photon.

12) Charged geometries create a longitudinal normal distribution of mass-Energies [a Bell curve] This distribution provides the geometric basis for the EM wave-functions [probability mechanics of QM]

All energy geometries radiate out from their point sources at the speed of Light. Their measured E-field and M-field changes are the result of expanding equilateral geometries. E-fields are diamond shaped geometries [Permittivity] M-fields are dual equilateral geometries [Permeability]

This clearly shows the connection between TIME in seconds and SPACE in [c^n directions]]]>

Tetryonic theory is founded on the equilateral geometry of Planck energy quanta, where the square quantum numbers of Physics are in fact equilateral geometries.

Planck quanta [kg*[m^2/s] is a measure of the Energy/sec [mass] of the quanta, and its quantised Angular momentum [qAm] m^2/s which is the direct result of its equilateral geometry [not a vector rotation about a point as it is classically described].

The qAm gives rise to all geometry at the Planck scale through Charge [which is the result of h/c^2 geometries].

These h quanta combine to create a 'fabric' of mass-Energy over the geometric framework that Charge interaction creates and the number of h quanta per charge fascia is what gives us the de Broglie, Compton frequencies, momenta etc of Matter itself.

mass-Energies are 2D planar EM fields and Matter is a 3D standing-wave geometry made up up [n]pi square number Planck mass-Energy geometries.

In the QM eBook you can follow the development of all fermionic Matter geometries from charged

Tetryons [4pi], Quarks [12pi], Leptons [12pi], Mesons [24pi], Baryons [36pi] etc

as determined by Weak & Strong force interactions between the Charged fascia of Planck mass-Energies.

Each geometry will have specific mass-Energy quanta contents for each n quantum energy level.

The Tetryonic UFE has the following basic structure Geometry * [mass-Energy quanta]

so Leptons are 12pi * n1 & Baryons are 36pi * 25^2 for their ground energy levels

resulting in 1.2 e20 for electrons - 22500 e19 for all Baryons [and for example 12 for Neutrinos]

This is all more clearly illustrated in the QM eBook in much greater detail for each particle type and family.

Of course the total charge fascia is what we measure as the net 'elementary' charge of each particle

electron [0 pos/12 neg charges = net neg 12 charge] - Protons [24 pos/12 neg = net 12 pos charge]

neutrinos [6/6 =0] Neutrons [18/18 =0]

Rest mass-Matter electrons have 1.2 e20 quanta [compton frequencies] and

rest mass-Matter Baryons have 2.25 e23 quanta [compton frequencies]

At some stage a decision has to be made regarding determining an exact value for Planck’s Constant – there are two paths to its determination.

1. An empirical measurement of the atomic weight of Carbon or Oxygen

[as was the case historically], or

2. A means of determining an exact value from theory must be developed.

Option 1 has the following problems:

It is an empirical measurement of quantum mass-Energies that cannot exclude the mass-Energy contributions to the measured system through sources of blackbody radiation, heat, kinetic energies etc. Even at Absolute Zero any means of measurement will, by necessity introduce energies into the system being measured in order to measure it.

Additionally, their remains the problem of obtaining an exact mole of any element free of isotopes etc that will affect the measurement and the determination of an exact value for any particular element.

Historically, Chemists used 1/12 of 12 grams of Carbon as the best estimate of an atomic mass close to that of a Hydrogen atom, while for a period Physicists sought to establish 1/16 of Oxygen as an alternative.

Both of these approaches are not accurate as all elements are made up of Deuterium nuclei not Hydrogen atoms with the result in either case being a weighted (or averaged) molar mass [with 1/2 electron masses]

Even the use of diatomic Hydrogen gas will introduce errors as the atoms will still have binding, and kinetic energies as well as elemental isotopes within the gas under measurement.

Many methodologies are currently employed by Physicists and Chemists around the World in an attempt to refine this value - many introducing addition constants and variables to the atoms under measurement

Option 2 - Determining Planck’s exact mass-energy momenta value from theory

Tetryonics, offers an alternative, purely theoretical approach to that outlined above and historically used.

Using Tetryonic geometry we can quickly calculate from theory an exact Compton frequency of Planck quanta comprising the mass-energies of the REST Matter of any element or compound:

Leptons are 12pi charged geometries with n1 energy levels

E = h*[v=1.2 e20] e mass = E/c^2

Baryons are 36pi charged geometries with n25 energy levels

E = h*[v=2.25 e23] H mass = E/c^2

[Thus determining the exact rest mass for each particle , exclusive of any additional energies of Black body radiation – kinetic motion or measurement etc fro theory alone]

We can now define Avogadro’s [N]umber to be the number of rest mass Hydrogen atoms in 1 gram (thus additionally implying that the inverse of Hydrogen’s mass will now also be equal to N)

Avogadro [6.022141579 e23] = N = [1.660538841 kg -1] H atom

From Tetryonic geometry we can use this defined mass for the rest mass of a single Hydrogen atom and divide by the Compton frequency of Hydrogen 2.2512 e23 [2.25 e23 + 1.2 e19] to determine a value for Planck’s Constant directly from theory [exclusive of weighting and other non-rest mass energies]

Solving for Planck’s constant from this rest mass of Hydrogen we get:

h = 6.629432672 e-34 J.s

This value is exclusive of any additional heat-kinetic energies and energies of measurement used and is the exact mass-Energy of a Proton & electron [not a P+½ electron using 1/12 C or 1/16 O methods]

Any deviation from this value must represent the energies introduced by any empirical measurement and/or the combined inaccuracies introduced by any measurement device or ill-defined physical constants used in determining the mass-energies of the system under study.

This value can then be applied in many additional ways, in conjunction with Tetryonic theory, to determine the rest and molar mass-energies of any element of compound and allow Chemists to determine the stored ‘chemical’ energies in any element or compound.

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

]]>

In physics, angular momentum, moment of momentum, or rotational momentum is a conserved vector quantity that can be used to describe the overall state of a physical system

When applied to specific mass-Energy-Matter systems QAM reveals the true quantum geometry and nature of Energy in our universe.

Normally viewed as an expression of rotational momentum Quantised Angular Momentum [qAm] is in fact a result of the nett equilateral geometric quantization of mass-Energy.

The definition of, and distinguishing between, mass & Matter in physics is one of the greatest failings of modern science.

Along with a physical definition of CHARGE geometries, it has lead to over a century of confusion in all the fields of science and its published literature.

Tetryonic geometry provides a clear foundation for the physics of mass & Matter and their relationship to Energy on all scales of physics.

mass is a 2D radiant form of EM energy

Matter is a 3D EM standing wave geometry [possessing volume]

2D mass is a property of 3D Matter - Matter is NOT a property of mass

Mass is redefined in Tetryonic terms as a 2D radiant form of EM energy.

The energy content of each charge geometry is comprised of numerous quantum EM fields that always total to a square number of quanta.

EM masses are designated a n[Pi] quanta in Tetryonic theory

Matter is designated as T[pi] quanta in Tetryonic theory

So as to distingush 2D radiant mass-Energy from 3D standing-wave Matte

Tetryonic Matter is the building block of Fermions, Baryons and elements.

ALL EM mass-ENERGY-Matter has Equilateral Geometry.

Transverse EM mass-Energies form Bosons [Quantum Levels]

Longitudinal EM mass-Energies form Photons

Bosons combine to form SQUARE scalar EM energies

Massless is scientific misnomer.

2D [non-Tetrahedral] EM mass-ENERGY is 'Matterless."

Equilateral Geometry is the inverse of spherical geometry.

Energy has a mass equivalence when measured per unit Time

The SQUARE numbers of energy in physics are Equilateral geometries.

ODD pi geometries are Bosons [EM charge carriers]

EVEN pi geometries are Photons [EM force carriers]

The energy quanta of any EM field is a SQUARE number [sum of consecutive Odd number Bosons]

This is the foundation of everything. Once you get your head around the equilateral energy and its geometry, you can start putting things together without the math, and equally you can start using it to check the math of what people are telling you.

What I'm going to describe today is the equilateral tile that makes up everything. What I'll go through is the geometry, how the square roots of the momentum come about and how they relate to the current formulations of quantum mechanics. There is a bit of re-wiring of the brain that has to take place in order to follow what's going on. As you abandon the math and switch to the geometry, you'll find that you don't even think about which is which and what property is what. I look at the triangle and look where the arrow is and the rest of it just happens. It orientates around where the square root of the energy is, the angular momentum. From there you can figure everything else out.

What's been missing from the Standard Model of physics today, as it's been developed, is a tangible geometry in order to further develop a lot of our math. The current math at the moment relies on Gaussian formulations, where 4[pi] geometries are assumed to be spherical just like planets and stars. What Tetryonics will show and further elaborate on, is that the geometry or the [pi] geometry of energy is in fact equilateral triangles. It's the tessellation or joining together of these equilateral triangles that creates the quantum mechanics that we formulate our math on. It then goes on to create all the large scale Classical interactions of Newton and gravitation.

All the material that we are going through today is covered in the Tetryonics PDF's, predominantly Quantum Mechanics and then ElectroDynamics. They are the first two books in the Tetryonics series. The first one obviously being the foundation of Quantum Mechanics.

Einstein said it best when he pointed out that our understanding, everyone's understanding of physics and mathematics is basically a preconception. It's how we have come to understand either the math or the physics as it's been explained to us. The universities do just that. They explain math to us the way they understand it and then they test us to make sure we've understood the way they understand it. Unfortunately, in order to break out of the mold and create new and exciting developments in science, inevitably we have to break out of the mold. We have to move out on different paths. We have to explore and we have to come up with new testable hypothesis that we can then apply and further develop science and physics in particular.

Tetryonics takes quantized energy and angular momenta, which is normally expressed in the form of Planck's Constant, and says there is one form with two properties either side of that one form. The form being an equilateral triangle and the two properties being positive and negative charge. Any neutral energy quanta, or triangle will have a positive side and a negative side when floating in free space and being measured. As its charge measurement goes, even though it has the properties of positive and negative, it will in fact be neutral. This has led to a lot of problems in the detection and formulation of Quantum Mechanics from our Classical viewpoint.

What must be stressed and what will be seen as you go further and further into Tetryonics, is that the entire universe and everything in it boils down to just one geometry. As we've discussed that geometry is an equilateral triangle. It is positive and negative charge on either side and as soon as large quanta of those geometries are broken up into separate charges, all they want to do is seek equilibrium. It doesn't matter if it's charge equilibrium or if it's energy equilibrium, they just want to equalize out into the most stable state they can find. In doing so they create all the nuclear interactions we are familiar with along with the large scale interactions such as gravity. They are also responsible for the Familiar Law of opposites attract and similars repel.

Tetryonics itself has 3 main laws. The first one being that Energy itself is equilateral. The second one is that the law of interaction and all energy in what ever form it is will seek equilibrium. The third law states that once the system is in motion and it's seeking equilibrium, it will continue indefinitely as it cycles through it's various forms backwards and forwards.

]]>