<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>The Future is Green</title>
    
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1782670</id>
    <updated>2011-07-13T15:16:01-04:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Sustainability, Greener Living and the Environment 

Barry Katz, CGP, LEED AP</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/tfigblog/SWkP" /><feedburner:info uri="tfigblog/swkp" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><entry>
        <title>House Fails to Repeal Light Bulb Efficiency Standards</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/07/house-fails-to-repeal-light-bulb-efficiency-standards.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/07/house-fails-to-repeal-light-bulb-efficiency-standards.html" thr:count="5" thr:updated="2012-01-18T18:24:57-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c01538fdde28e970b</id>
        <published>2011-07-13T15:16:01-04:00</published>
        <updated>2011-07-13T15:16:01-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Today, the US House of Representatives defeated a misguided Republican sponsored bill intended to roll back light bulb efficiency standards passed during the Bush administration. (Insert huge sigh of relief here) Predictably, the vote was mostly along party lines, with a few defectors from each side of the aisle; five Democrats voted in favor of the bill and ten Republicans voted against the bill. One Republican voted "present." Why Republicans would want to repeal a bill signed by George Bush that will save Americans $12.5 billion by 2020, cut pollution, and create manufacturing jobs is a complete mystery to me. Right-wing pundits like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck, and Tea Partiers like Michelle Bachman have recently expended enough hot air to heat all of Buffalo next winter, trying to persuade people that the 2007 energy bill would outlaw incandescent light bulbs entirely. It does no such thing; as I reported...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="energy efficiency" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c014e89d14f65970d-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="Incandescentbulb" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c014e89d14f65970d" height="168" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c014e89d14f65970d-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="Incandescentbulb" width="253" /></a> Today, the US House of Representatives defeated a misguided Republican sponsored bill intended to roll back light bulb efficiency standards passed during the Bush administration.</p>
<p>(Insert huge sigh of relief here)</p>
<p>Predictably, the vote was mostly along party lines, with a few defectors from each side of the aisle; five Democrats voted in  favor of the bill and ten Republicans voted against the bill. One  Republican voted "present."</p>
<p>Why Republicans would want to repeal a bill signed by George Bush that will save Americans $12.5 billion by 2020, cut pollution, and create manufacturing jobs is a complete mystery to me. Right-wing pundits like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck, and Tea Partiers like Michelle Bachman have recently expended enough hot air to heat all of Buffalo next winter, trying to persuade people that the 2007 energy bill would outlaw incandescent light bulbs entirely. It does no such thing; as I reported back in <a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/imagine-trading-in-your-new-car-for-an-edsel-in-essence-thats-what-some-in-congress-want-to-do-with-light-bulbs-accordi.html" target="_self">March</a>, (<a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/stephen-colbert-sheds-light-on-efficient-light-bulbs-sort-of.html" target="_self">twice</a>, in fact) it simply mandates that incandescent bulbs become more efficient.</p>
<p>It's lovely to feel, however briefly, that Congress occasionally gets something right.</p>
<p> </p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Is The Earth Full?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/06/thomas-friedman-paul-gilding-the-great-disruption-climate-change-china-water-crisis-population.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/06/thomas-friedman-paul-gilding-the-great-disruption-climate-change-china-water-crisis-population.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-06-09T06:57:13-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c014e88feb5fe970d</id>
        <published>2011-06-08T11:15:50-04:00</published>
        <updated>2011-06-08T11:13:16-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Thomas Friedman's Op-ed piece, "The Earth is Full," in todays New York Times was both deeply sobering and, at the same time, oddly hopeful. Friedman writes, "You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask ourselves: What were we thinking? How did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth/climate/natural resource/population redlines all at once?" The only answer, according to the Austrialian environmentalist, Paul Gilding, author of the new book “The Great Disruption: Why the Climate Crisis Will Bring On the End of Shopping and the Birth of a New World,” can be denial....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Books" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sustainability" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Environment" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="China" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Paul Gilding" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Population" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Sustainable economic model." />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="The Great Disruption" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Thomas Friedman" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Water Crisis" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c015432de7a54970c-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="Screen shot 2011-06-08 at 10.37.27 AM" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c015432de7a54970c" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c015432de7a54970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="Screen shot 2011-06-08 at 10.37.27 AM" /></a> Thomas Friedman's Op-ed piece, "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/08/opinion/08friedman.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion" target="_blank">The Earth is Full</a>,"  in todays New York Times was both deeply sobering and, at the same time, oddly hopeful.</p>
<p>Friedman writes, "You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look  back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked,  energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through  cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and  governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask  ourselves: What were we thinking? How did we not panic when the evidence  was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth/climate/natural  resource/population redlines all at once?"</p>
<p> The only answer, according to the Austrialian environmentalist, Paul Gilding, author of the new book “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1608192237/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_il_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=transitionvoice-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1608192237" target="_blank">The Great Disruption: Why the Climate Crisis Will Bring On the End of Shopping and the Birth of a New World</a>,” can be denial.</p>
<p>Gilding expects dramatic changes in the way we live on Planet Earth. We are irrevocably headed for a Great Disruption, he says, due to the simple fact that, “If you cut down more trees than you grow, you run out of trees. If you put additional nitrogen into a water system, you  change the type and quantity of life that water can support. If you  thicken the Earth’s CO2 blanket, the Earth gets warmer," all of which, he says will change the way the planet's whole ecosystem behaves, with social, economic, and life support  impacts." It's not speculation, Gilding asserts, "this is high school science.”</p>
<p>The more hopeful part of his message, however, is that as these impacts hit, “our response will be proportionally  dramatic, mobilizing as we do in war. We will change at a scale and  speed we can barely imagine today, completely transforming our economy,  including our energy and transport industries, in just a few short  decades.”</p>
<p>The consumer-driven growth model that has led us to where we are today, Gilding believes, is irrevocably broken. But his conclusion is that we will be forece to move to a more happiness-driven growth model, based on people working less and owning less.</p>
<p>“How many people,” Gilding  asks, “lie on their death bed and say, ‘I wish I had worked harder or  built more shareholder value,’ and how many say, ‘I wish I had gone to  more ballgames, read more books to my kids, taken more walks?’ To do  that, you need a growth model based on giving people more time to enjoy  life, but with less stuff.”</p>
<p>Are we really ready for that? Gilding thinks we're closer than you might think. "We either allow  collapse to overtake us," he says, "or develop a new sustainable economic model. We  will choose the latter. We may be slow, but we’re not stupid.”</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Plan B: Mobilizing to Save Civilization," hosted by Matt Damon on PBS March 30</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/watch-the-full-episode-see-more-journey-to-planet-earth.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/watch-the-full-episode-see-more-journey-to-planet-earth.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2011-07-06T14:52:14-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c014e870144f0970d</id>
        <published>2011-03-27T19:58:35-04:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-27T19:57:08-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Lester Brown's visionary book, “Plan B: Mobilizing to Save Civilization,” has been on my top ten list for several years. Now, a documentary based on the book will be broadcast on PBS on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 at 10 p.m, hosted by Academy Award winner Matt Damon. I encourage you to watch. Appearing with Lester Brown are Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, Pulitzer Prize winner Tom Friedman, former Governor and Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, along with other scholars and scientists. Parts of the film were shot on location in China, Japan, Korea, India, Italy, Turkey, Bangladesh, Zambia, Haiti, and the United States. Describing the film, the LA Times says, “The scope is wide, the photography compelling, the presentation is crisp. Take notice unless you’ve already booked passage to another galaxy.” What makes “Plan B” so fascinating for me is that it provides a slew of hopeful and realistic strategies...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="energy efficiency" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Mass Transit" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Renewable Energy" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Science" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sustainability" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Television" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Environment" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="global warming" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Lester Brown" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Matt Damon" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Mobilization to Save Civilization" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="new economy" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Paul Krugman" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="PBS" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Plan B" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Thomas Friedman" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
<object data="http://www-tc.pbs.org/video/media/swf/PBSPlayer.swf" height="270" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="448">
<param name="data" value="http://www-tc.pbs.org/video/media/swf/PBSPlayer.swf" />
<param name="flashvars" value="video=1694551707&amp;player=viral&amp;end=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
<param name="src" value="http://www-tc.pbs.org/video/media/swf/PBSPlayer.swf" />
<param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p>
<p>Lester Brown's visionary book, “Plan B: Mobilizing to Save Civilization,” has been on my top ten list for several years. Now, a documentary based on the book will be broadcast on PBS on Wednesday, March 30, 2011 at 10 p.m, hosted by Academy Award winner Matt Damon. I encourage you to watch.</p>
<p>Appearing with Lester Brown are Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, Pulitzer Prize winner Tom Friedman, former Governor and Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, along with other scholars and scientists. Parts of the film were shot on location in China, Japan, Korea, India, Italy, Turkey, Bangladesh, Zambia, Haiti, and the United States.</p>
<p>Describing the film, the LA Times says, “The scope is wide, the photography compelling, the presentation is crisp. Take notice unless you’ve already booked passage to another galaxy.”</p>
<p>What makes “Plan B” so fascinating for me is that it provides a slew of hopeful and realistic strategies to avoid the growing threat of global warming, while, at the same time, strengthening the ecomony. If the film is half as good as the book, it will be an hour well spent.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Barry Katz to be Featured Author at Green Lifestyle Fair on April 2 in Westbrook, CT</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/barry-katz-to-be-featured-author-at-green-lifestyle-fair-on-april-2-in-westbrook-ct.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/barry-katz-to-be-featured-author-at-green-lifestyle-fair-on-april-2-in-westbrook-ct.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c014e86958505970d</id>
        <published>2011-03-26T06:00:00-04:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-26T06:00:00-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Barry Katz will be the featured author at this year’s Green Lifestyle Fair, hosted by The Shoreline League of Democratic Women (SLDW) on Saturday, April 2, 2011. The event, which is free and open to the public, runs from 9am to 3:30pm, at the Water’s Edge Resort and Spa, in Westbrook, CT. Barry will be speaking about his book, Practical Green Remodeling, at 11:00 AM, and will be on hand to sign books and answer questions throughout the day. The Green Lifestyle Fair will host a wide variety of Exhibitors featuring energy alternatives, green products and services. Industry experts and environmental advocates will be on hand to discuss energy alternatives, financial incentives, conservation initiatives, and the most pressing challenges affecting our environment today. For more information on the event, visit the SLDW web site at www.SLDW.org or call 860-399-1147. Also during the event, there will also be a Green Book...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Books" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Barry Katz will be the featured author at this year’s Green Lifestyle Fair, hosted by The Shoreline League of Democratic Women (SLDW) on Saturday, April 2, 2011. The event, which is free and open to the public, runs from 9am to 3:30pm, at the Water’s Edge Resort and Spa, in Westbrook, CT.</p>
<p>Barry will be speaking about his book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Green-Remodeling-Down-Earth/dp/160085088X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1284572000&amp;sr=8-1" target="_self">Practical Green Remodeling</a>, at 11:00 AM, and will be on hand to sign books and answer questions throughout the day.</p>
<p>The Green Lifestyle Fair will host a wide variety of Exhibitors featuring energy alternatives, green products and services. Industry experts and environmental advocates will be on hand to discuss energy alternatives, financial incentives, conservation initiatives, and the most pressing challenges affecting our environment today. For more information on the event, visit the SLDW web site at <a href="http://www.sldw.org" target="_self">www.SLDW.org</a> or call 860-399-1147.</p>
<p>Also during the event, there will also be a Green Book Fair, Energy-Saving Lighting Fair, and Eco-friendly Raffle. The Green Book Fair will carry the latest titles in eco-friendly lifestyles for adults and children, from seasonal cooking to practical green remodeling.</p>
<p>The Lighting Fair will offer ENERGY STAR lighting products at deeply discounted prices for Green Lifestyle Fair attendees.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Turn off your lights for Earth Hour Saturday 26 March 2011</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/my-entry.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/my-entry.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-04-30T16:11:15-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c014e601c1aee970c</id>
        <published>2011-03-25T17:52:11-04:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-25T18:07:20-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Can you think of something fun to do in the dark for one hour? At 8:30 PM on Saturday 26th March 2011, lights will switch off around the globe for Earth Hour. Around the globe, hundreds of millions of people will be turning off their lights for an hour, and committing to actions large and small that help fight climate change. Earth Hour started in 2007 in Sydney, Australia when 2.2 million individuals and more than 2,000 businesses turned their lights off for one hour to take a stand against climate change. Only a year later and Earth Hour had become a global sustainability movement with more than 50 million people across 35 countries/territories participating. Global landmarks such as the Sydney Harbour Bridge, CN Tower in Toronto, Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, and Rome’s Colosseum, all stood in darkness, as symbols of hope for a cause that grows more...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Environment" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Earth Hour" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="World Wildlife Fund" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
<object data="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Mxjbip6y04?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" height="270" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="448">
<param name="data" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Mxjbip6y04?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4Mxjbip6y04?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p>
<p>Can you think of something fun to do in the dark for one hour? At 8:30 PM on Saturday 26th March 2011, lights will  switch off around the globe for <a href="http://www.earthhour.org/Homepage.aspx?intro=no" target="_blank" title="http://www.earthhour.org/Homepage.aspx?intro=no">Earth Hour</a>. Around the globe, hundreds of millions of people will be turning off their lights for an hour, and committing to actions large and small that help fight climate change.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c014e86f7196d970d-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="EH_logo" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c014e86f7196d970d" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c014e86f7196d970d-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="EH_logo" /></a> Earth Hour started in 2007 in Sydney, Australia when 2.2 million  individuals and more than 2,000 businesses turned their lights off for  one hour to take a stand against climate change. Only a year later and  Earth Hour had become a global sustainability movement with more than 50  million people across 35 countries/territories participating. Global  landmarks such as the Sydney Harbour Bridge, CN Tower in Toronto, Golden  Gate Bridge in San Francisco, and Rome’s Colosseum, all stood in  darkness, as symbols of hope for a cause that grows more urgent by the  hour.</p>
<p>By March 2009, hundreds of millions of people around the world took part in the third  Earth Hour. And Earth Hour 2010 was the  biggest ever. In 128 countries Iconic buildings and landmarks  from Asia Pacific to Europe and Africa to the Americas switched off their lights.  People across the world from all walks of life turned off their lights  and came together in celebration and contemplation of the one thing we  all have in common – our planet.</p>
<p>Earth Hour 2011 will take place on Saturday 26 March at 8.30PM (local time)<a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c0147e376f291970b-pi" style="float: right;"><img alt="App" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c0147e376f291970b" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c0147e376f291970b-320wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" title="App" /></a>. </p>
<p>There is even an Earth Hour iPhone app. Click <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/earth-hour-60/id424284662?mt=8&amp;ls=1" target="_blank" title="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/earth-hour-60/id424284662?mt=8&amp;ls=1">here</a> to see it in the app store.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Stephen Colbert Sheds Light on Efficient Light Bulbs, Sort of</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/stephen-colbert-sheds-light-on-efficient-light-bulbs-sort-of.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/stephen-colbert-sheds-light-on-efficient-light-bulbs-sort-of.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-03-26T09:54:57-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c014e86a03ef3970d</id>
        <published>2011-03-10T12:12:31-05:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-10T12:10:51-05:00</updated>
        <summary>As a follow-up to my previous post, readers might find this amusing. Last night, Stephen Colbert interviewed Natural Resources Defence Council’s Dale Bryk about the upcoming debate in Congress about light bulbs. In usual fashion, Colbert doesn't add a lot of clarity to the issue, but when was the last time a light bulb made you laugh?</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="CFL" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="compact fluorescent light bulbs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Dale Byrk" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Efficient Light Bulbs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Mercury" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Natural Resources Defense Council" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="NRDC" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Recycling CFLs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Stephen Colbert" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
<object data="http://www.hulu.com/embed/FtfhtyLGvBpim5ODHgKGuw" height="288" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512">
<param name="data" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/FtfhtyLGvBpim5ODHgKGuw" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/FtfhtyLGvBpim5ODHgKGuw" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p>
<p>As a follow-up to my previous post, readers might find this amusing. Last night, Stephen Colbert interviewed Natural Resources Defence Council’s <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/dbryk" target="_blank">Dale Bryk</a> about the upcoming  debate in Congress about light bulbs. In usual fashion, Colbert doesn't add a lot of clarity to the issue, but when was the last time a light bulb made you laugh?</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Why Congress Shouldn't Repeal Efficient Light Bulb Standards</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/imagine-trading-in-your-new-car-for-an-edsel-in-essence-thats-what-some-in-congress-want-to-do-with-light-bulbs-accordi.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/03/imagine-trading-in-your-new-car-for-an-edsel-in-essence-thats-what-some-in-congress-want-to-do-with-light-bulbs-accordi.html" thr:count="5" thr:updated="2011-07-15T02:47:59-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c014e5fbac5ab970c</id>
        <published>2011-03-08T17:00:03-05:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-08T17:00:54-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Imagine trading in y our new car for an Edsel. In essence, that’s what some in Congress want to do with light bulbs, according to Elizabeth Heyd of the Natural Resources Defense Council. On Thursday March 10, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee is scheduled to consider a bill (S.395) introduced by Wyoming Republican Sen. Mike Enzi that would repeal efforts to expand the use of more energy-efficient light bulbs. Along with companion bills sponsored by House Republican Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, and Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, the proposals would roll back energy efficiency standards signed into law by President George W. Bush that are designed to increase the efficiency of light bulbs by at least 25 percent. If passed, the bills from Enzi, Barton and Bachmann would derail plans for new job-creating lighting factories and eliminate an estimated $10 billion in annual energy costs savings....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="energy efficiency" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="The Environment" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Congress" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Efficient Light Bulb Standards" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Energy Efficient Light Bulbs" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Energy Efficient Lighting" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Imagine trading in y<a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c014e5fbac6ef970c-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="Edsel" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c014e5fbac6ef970c" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c014e5fbac6ef970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="Edsel" /></a>our new car for an Edsel. In essence, that’s what some in Congress want to do with light bulbs, according to Elizabeth Heyd of the Natural Resources Defense Council.</span></p>
<p>On Thursday March 10, the <a href="http://energy.senate.gov/public/" target="_blank">Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee</a> is scheduled to consider a bill (S.395) introduced by Wyoming Republican Sen. Mike Enzi that would repeal efforts to expand the use of more energy-efficient light bulbs.</p>
<p>Along with companion bills sponsored by House Republican Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, and Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota, the proposals would roll back energy efficiency standards signed into law by President George W. Bush that are designed to increase the efficiency of light bulbs by at least 25 percent.</p>
<p>If passed, the bills from Enzi, Barton and Bachmann would derail plans for new job-creating lighting factories and eliminate an estimated $10 billion in annual energy costs savings.</p>
<p>Please tell Congress that going backward on light bulbs not a very bright idea.<br /> <br /> <strong>FUZZY LOGIC<br /> <br /> </strong>Opponents to new efficient light bulb standards say the government wants to tell consumers which types of light bulbs they can use, limit their choices to swirly compact florescent lamp bulbs, and ban incandescent bulbs. <br /> <br /> That’s just not the case.<br /> <br /> The new standards don’t force any type of bulb on consumers, nor do they ban any type of bulb. Incandescent bulbs will still be available – it’s just that new and improved incandescent bulbs will put out the same sort of light using 28 percent less energy. Current incandescent waste about 90 percent of the energy they consume.<br /> <br /> And, of course, if you want to save even more, compact fluorescents (CFLs) that are now widely available will cut your energy costs by as much as 75 percent.<br /> <br /> <strong>AMERICANS LIKE </strong><strong>THEIR </strong><strong>EFFICIENT LIGTH BULBS</strong></p>
<p>Consumers already are adapting to better bulbs - and they like them. <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/greenhouse/post/2011/02/poll-americans-ok-newer-light-bulbs/1" target="_blank">A February poll by USA Today</a> found that nearly 3 out of 4 Americans have recently purchased new, more efficient light bulbs and 84 percent said they were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with them.<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>SAVINGS – AND MORE SAVINGS </strong></p>
<p>When fully implemented, the new light bulb standards are expected to reduce the nation’s power bill by $10 billion a year. <br /> <br /> The savings don’t stop there. The new standards also will reduce the need to build as many as 30 new power plants and cut greenhouse gas pollution by 100 million tons – the equivalent of taking 17 million cars off the road - helping reduce health problems (and health costs) along the way.</p>
<p><strong>LIGHT BULB INNOVATION DRIVES ECONOMIC GROWTH</strong></p>
<p>New lighting standards are already driving R&amp;D investments in the United States and creating new jobs. Some examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>Sylvania recently retooled its St. Mary’s, Penn. incandescent bulb plant to make new incandescents that meet the new standards.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Philips Lumiled in California, Cree Inc. in North Carolina, and Lighting Science Group in Florida are creating thousands of new jobs at factories that make new LED bulbs.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Bulb maker TCP Inc. used to do all of its manufacturing in China. But in 2009, the company announced plans for its first U.S. plant, in Ohio, to help meet growing demand for CFLs because of the new standards. When was the last time you heard of a company moving its manufacturing from China to the United States?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>HEALTH CONCERNS</strong></p>
<p>When all else fails, opponents to the new lighting standards use scare tactics and bring up health concerns. CFLs contain dangerous mercury, they point out.</p>
<p>At best, the health scare tactics are a huge stretch.</p>
<p>Today’s CFLs contain an average of four milligrams of mercury. In contrast, U.S. power plants pumped nearly 90,000 pounds of mercury in to the air in 2008, much of it in order to generate power for outdated light bulbs. To generate that amount of mercury, you’d have to break about 10 billion CFL bulbs<br /> <br /> <strong>WANT MORE INFORMATION?</strong></p>
<p>For a fact sheet on the new light bulb standards please see <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/nhorowitz/" target="_blank">http://www.nrdc.org/lightbulbs/</a></p>
<p>For information about the federal policy implications of the new standards from NRDC Federal Energy Policy Director Jim Presswood, please see <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jpresswood/" target="_blank">http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/jpresswood/</a></p>
<p>For details about more efficient light bulbs from Noah Horowitz, NRDC senior scientist and director of NRDC’s Center for Energy Efficiency, please see <a href="http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/nhorowitz/" target="_blank">http://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/nhorowitz/</a></p>
<p> </p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Practical Green Remodeling on Martha Stewart Living Radio</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/01/practical-green-remodeling-on-martha-stewart-living-radio.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2011/01/practical-green-remodeling-on-martha-stewart-living-radio.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-09-15T12:42:50-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c0148c79dd8f9970c</id>
        <published>2011-01-14T15:49:55-05:00</published>
        <updated>2011-01-14T15:49:55-05:00</updated>
        <summary>This Monday, January 17 at 3:00 PM, I will be discussing my book, Practical Green Remodeling, with host Mario Bosquez on the program "Living Today," on the Martha Stewart Living radio channel on Sirius (channel 112). If you are not a Sirius subscriber you can get a FREE 7-day trial at http://www.sirius.com/freetrial/register. It will enable you to listen online to all Sirius programs.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c0148c79dd402970c-pi" style="float: left;"><img alt="Marthas_m" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c0148c79dd402970c" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c0148c79dd402970c-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" title="Marthas_m" /></a> This Monday, January 17 at 3:00 PM, I will be discussing my book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Green-Remodeling-Down-Earth/dp/160085088X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1284572000&amp;sr=8-1" target="_self">Practical Green Remodeling</a>, with host Mario Bosquez on the program "<a href="http://www.marthastewart.com/portal/site/mslo/menuitem.4af27a8e9e64e1611e3bf410b5900aa0/?vgnextoid=9677904412cd0110VgnVCM1000003d370a0aRCRD&amp;vgnextfmt=default" target="_self">Living Today</a>," on the Martha Stewart Living radio channel on Sirius (channel 112). If you are not a Sirius subscriber you can get a FREE 7-day trial at <a href="http://www.sirius.com/freetrial/register" target="_blank">http://www.sirius.com/freetrial/register.</a> It will enable you to listen online to all Sirius programs.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>What Is Nature Worth? A New Animated Video on the Cost of Biodiversity Loss</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2010/12/what-is-nature-worth-an-animated-video-on-the-cost-of-biodiversity-loss.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2010/12/what-is-nature-worth-an-animated-video-on-the-cost-of-biodiversity-loss.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-02-23T15:13:02-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c0148c67e63af970c</id>
        <published>2010-12-07T15:05:12-05:00</published>
        <updated>2010-12-07T15:04:11-05:00</updated>
        <summary>Whatever you are doing right now, I encourage you to take a 3-minute break and watch "Big Question: What Is Nature Worth?", an eye-opening animated video that offers a fresh look at global biodiversity loss - not only what it is costing humanity, but also what we can do about it. "Big Question: What Is Nature Worth:?" is part of Momentum magazine's biodiversity issue (http://www.environment.umn.edu/momentum) and was inspired by the Natural Capital Project – a partnership between Stanford University, The Nature Conservancy, the University of Minnesota and the World Wildlife Fund. I thought it was worth passing along.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Climate Change" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Science" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sustainability" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Animated Video on the Cost of Biodiversity Loss" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Natural Capital" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="What Is Nature Worth?" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
<object width="500" height="350" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/TartoYpK1yI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" />
<param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TartoYpK1yI&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" />
<param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" />
</object>
</p>
<p>Whatever you are doing right now, I encourage you to take a 3-minute break and watch "Big Question: What Is  Nature Worth?", an eye-opening animated video that offers a fresh look at global  biodiversity loss - not only what it is costing humanity, but also what  we can do about it. <br /> <br /> "Big Question: What Is Nature Worth:?" is part of Momentum magazine's biodiversity issue (<a title="http://www.environment.umn.edu/momentum/" href="http://www.environment.umn.edu/momentum" target="_blank">http://www.environment.umn.edu/momentum</a>)  and was inspired by the Natural Capital Project – a partnership between  Stanford University, The Nature Conservancy, the University of  Minnesota and the World Wildlife Fund.</p>
<p>I thought it was worth passing along.</p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Book Review of Practical Green Remodeling from The Oregonian</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2010/11/book-review-of-practical-green-remodeling-from-the-oregonian.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2010/11/book-review-of-practical-green-remodeling-from-the-oregonian.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2010-12-29T01:36:04-05:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c0133f61965b1970b</id>
        <published>2010-11-19T15:13:08-05:00</published>
        <updated>2010-11-19T15:08:34-05:00</updated>
        <summary>There was a nice review of my book on The Oregonian's web site yesterday. I thought I would post a copy of it here. More green remodeling tips coming soon! Book review: 'Practical Green Remodeling' makes you think Published: Thursday, November 18, 2010, 7:00 AM Bridget A. Otto, The Oregonian Right off the bat, author Barry Katz says his book, "Practical Green Remodeling: Down-to-Earth Solutions for Everyday Homes," is not a how-to book. It's more a book about ideas and reasons for making sound and wise changes to your home. More importantly, Katz approaches the subject of green and sustainable building by explaining that nothing is clear-cut. For instance, for the question about whether a house can be green without using green materials, the answer is both yes and no. He explains that there are shades of green and no house or building that is absolutely green. "Ironically, the greenest...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Books" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Book review: 'Practical Green Remodeling' The Oregonian Bridget A. Otto Taunton Press Home remodeling Energy Efficiency" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>There was a nice review of my book on The Oregonian's web site yesterday. I thought I would post a copy of it here.</p>
<p>More green remodeling tips coming soon!</p>
<h1><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Book review: 'Practical Green Remodeling' makes you think</span></strong></h1>
<h5><span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 8pt;">Published: Thursday, November 18, 2010,  7:00 AM</span></h5>
<p><a href="http://connect.oregonlive.com/user/botto/index.html"> <img alt="Bridget A. Otto, The Oregonian" height="40" src="http://media.oregonlive.com//avatars/userpic-1059-200x200.png" width="40" /> </a> <a href="http://connect.oregonlive.com/user/botto/index.html"> Bridget A. Otto, The Oregonian </a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">Right off the bat, author Barry Katz says his book, "Practical Green  Remodeling: Down-to-Earth Solutions for Everyday Homes," is not a how-to  book. It's more a book about ideas and reasons for making sound and  wise changes to your home. </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">More importantly, Katz approaches the  subject of green and sustainable building by explaining that nothing is  clear-cut. For instance, for the question about whether a house can be  green without using green materials, the answer is both yes and no. He  explains that there are shades of green and no house or building that is  absolutely green. </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">"Ironically, the greenest thing is no building at all," he writes. </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">In  each chapter, Katz offers a summary of his thoughts under the heading  Green View. In the chapter on material selection he lists questions you  should ask about each material that goes into remodeling your home. The  questions are intended to help you to winnow out what shouldn't be used  and make an informed decision, which can be truly helpful when you think  about the sea of materials available. </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">In the chapter "Green Inside and Out," the summary reads in part: </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">"Advocates  of healthy eating will tell you that the foods that are best for you  are the ones containing the fewest ingredients. The same advice can be  applied to furniture and fabrics for the home. ... Most synthetic  fabrics contain dozens of ingredients, many of which are not even  identified on the label. Wool has one ingredient." </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">See what I mean? He gets you thinking. </span><br /><br /><span style="color: #0000bf; font-size: 11pt;">Katz  also addresses the value-added component of making sustainable  renovations. Throughout the book, his tone is more that of an informed  friend than a preachy advocate. The softbound book is loaded with  photographs, charts and diagrams to help explain each topic.</span></p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Green Remodeling Tips: Does Going Green Add Value to Your Home?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2010/10/green-remodeling-tips-does-going-green-add-value-to-your-home.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/2010/10/green-remodeling-tips-does-going-green-add-value-to-your-home.html" thr:count="9" thr:updated="2011-06-14T04:14:41-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a01053647073b970c0133f569abfa970b</id>
        <published>2010-10-28T15:54:25-04:00</published>
        <updated>2010-10-28T15:54:25-04:00</updated>
        <summary>First of all, a big thank you to everyone who has bought a copy of my book, Practical Green Remodeling. As of a moment ago, Amazon.com's sales ranking show that it is #1 in Home &amp; Garden &gt; Sustainable Living&gt;Energy Efficiency, and #2 in Home &amp; Garden &gt; How-to &amp; Home Improvements &gt; Remodeling &amp; Renovation Here is another excerpt from the book (with a few new edits): What’s my motivation for going green? Funny you should ask. You have two choices, really. Do you want to be totally hard nosed and practical, and just do things that directly benefit your family? Or do you want to get all environmental and tree huggerish? Save the whales and so forth. If you’re just in it for yourself, you can stick with things that make the house more comfortable and economical to run. Concentrate on cutting your monthly utility bills, and use...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Barry Katz</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="energy efficiency" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Green Building" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sustainability" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="energy efficiency" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Green remodeling" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="indoor air quality" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="investment value of green remodeling" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Practical green remodeling" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="prices of green homes" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="sales of green homes" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="value of green homes" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.tfigblog.com/the_future_is_green/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>  <a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c0133f569a36c970b-pi" style="float: left;"> </a><a href="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c01348889b371970c-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Blue farmhouse before and after" border="0" class="asset  asset-image at-xid-6a01053647073b970c01348889b371970c image-full" src="http://www.tfigblog.com/.a/6a01053647073b970c01348889b371970c-800wi" title="Blue farmhouse before and after" /></a></p>
<p>First of all, a big <em>thank you</em> to everyone who has bought a copy of my book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Practical-Green-Remodeling-Down-Earth/dp/160085088X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1284572000&amp;sr=8-1" target="_blank">Practical Green Remodeling</a>. As of a moment ago, Amazon.com's sales ranking show that it is</p>
<ul>
<li> <strong>#1</strong> in Home &amp; Garden &gt; Sustainable Living&gt;Energy Efficiency, </li>
<li><em>and</em> <strong>#2</strong> in Home &amp; Garden &gt; How-to &amp; Home Improvements &gt; Remodeling &amp; Renovation </li>
</ul>
<p>Here is another excerpt from the book (with a few new edits):</p>
<p><strong>What’s my motivation for going green?</strong></p>
<p>Funny you should ask. You have two choices, really. Do you want to be totally hard nosed and practical, and just do things that directly benefit your family? Or do you want to get all environmental and tree huggerish? Save the whales and so forth.</p>
<p>If you’re just in it for yourself, you can stick with things that make the house more comfortable and economical to run. Concentrate on cutting your monthly utility bills, and use more durable materials and construction methods so it will cost less to maintain.  And <em>forget about</em> the rest of the population; just worry about the people inside the house. Do things to reduce toxins and improve the indoor air quality - <em>for purely selfish reasons. </em></p>
<p>Or, if you’re seriously determined to try and save the planet, you could go the other way entirely. Not be so selfish. Remodel in ways that cut energy use in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce waste and conserve natural resources, and cut pollution. And vote with your wallet – refuse to buy materials and products that are environmentally harmful, or contain toxic compounds – which will drive down the price of those materials, to the benefit of everyone. In other words, you would make the house easier on the planet, more comfortable, more economical to operate, less expensive to maintain, better for your health, - <em>for purely altruistic reasons</em>.</p>
<p>What’s that you say? They both sound like exactly the same thing? Well, um, now that you mention it, yes, actually, they are. I have to admit, you’ve got a point there.</p>
<p><strong>But what’s the payoff?</strong></p>
<p>To answer that you have to ask yourself, what creates value? One of the first things homeowners want to know about any improvement is, will I it be a good investment? Will the added value justify the expense? But what is our standard for judging value? Is it just about how much the home will sell for?</p>
<p>Most home improvements do not add as much value to the house as they initially cost. A new kitchen that costs $50,000 typically adds less than $40,000 to the home’s resale value. On average, most renovations add anywhere from 65% to 85% of their cost to the home’s value.</p>
<p>So why do we do it? The answer for most people is that part of the value comes from the added enjoyment or functionality they get from the newly improved home. You might, for example, select a particularly attractive ceramic tile for your bathroom just because you like it, even though it costs more than a cheaper option that doesn’t turn you on. When you eventually sell the house, it is unlikely that your choice of tile will alter the price a buyer is willing to pay. But every day, when you walked into the bathroom it gave you pleasure. That’s worth something.</p>
<p>Adding a deck to the back of your house typically adds about 75% of its cost to the home’s value. But over the years you’ll spend many summer evenings relaxing on that deck, barbecuing, entertaining friends and family. The pleasure you get from having that deck means that, for you, it was money well spent.</p>
<p>But what about less tangible – or at least, less visible – improvements? If you install better ventilation and choose non-toxic materials that don’t endanger your family’s health, isn’t that worth something, even if the cost is slightly higher? What is the return on an investment that provides improved indoor air quality, reducing the likelihood that your children will suffer with allergies or asthma?</p>
<p>What if you have strong convictions about the environment? You might happily donate money to the World Wildlife Fund to help them fight deforestation in tropical rain forests. You don’t expect any return other than the knowledge that you helped a little bit. But you know that if enough people do the same, it will have a meaningful impact.</p>
<p>But what about spending a little more for sustainably harvested lumber? It won’t have any direct impact on your daily life. But as more people make that choice, it grows the market for sustainable lumber, which drives down the price. As the price goes down, illegal harvesting in rain forests, as well as other unsustainable forestry practices here and abroad, become less profitable, and a vital resource is preserved.</p>
<p>Weather any particular choice makes your home healthier to live in, or adds to your enjoyment of the house or your sense of pride in being a good citizen of Planet Earth, it is clear that not every decision you make is based on its value as an investment.</p>
<p>Still, in many ways, green remodeling <em>is</em> a sound financial investment. Investing in energy efficiency might cost a bit more up front, but you come out way ahead because the savings on your utility bills will be greater than the small increase in your mortgage payment. It is an investment that pays for itself – and then continues paying dividends as long as you own your home – <em>and</em> when you go to sell it. <strong>A growing body of evidence suggests that buyers are willing to pay more for energy-efficient green homes</strong>, and that such homes sell faster than nongreen homes.</p>
<p>As more people become aware of the benefits of living in healthy, energy-efficient homes, and as the cost of energy rises, it is very likely that those homes will sell at a significant premium, while energy hogs with poor indoor air quality will lose value.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p></div>
</content>



    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->

