<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Cockle Bur</title>
	
	<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com</link>
	<description>Legal Minds on Legal Matters and Whatever Else Strikes Our Fancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thecocklebur/rss" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="thecocklebur/rss" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">thecocklebur/rss</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Legal Education in Crisis?</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/law-school-2/legal-education-in-crisis</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/law-school-2/legal-education-in-crisis#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shon R. Hopwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Fish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the New York Times, Professor Stanley Fish discusses the state of legal education. Fish writes: Uneasiness about the state of legal education has been around for some time, but in the wake of the financial meltdown of 2008, uneasiness ripened into a conviction that something was terribly wrong as law school applications declined, thousands of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/law-school-2/legal-education-in-crisis/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/cockle-printing%e2%80%99s-healthcare-litigation-forum-15</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/cockle-printing%e2%80%99s-healthcare-litigation-forum-15#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Cockle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friday was the due date for amici filing in support of the Administration on the Medicaid question. You can find two briefs filed by Cockle Printing at our website: Brief of Amici Curiae Health Law &#38; Policy Scholars and Prescription Policy Choices in Support of Respondents on the Constitutional Validity of the Medicaid Expansion Brief [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/cockle-printing%e2%80%99s-healthcare-litigation-forum-15/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cockle Printing’s Healthcare Litigation Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/cockle-printing%e2%80%99s-healthcare-litigation-forum-14</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/cockle-printing%e2%80%99s-healthcare-litigation-forum-14#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Cockle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week was a big one in the Supreme Court’s healthcare cases. Three different amicus due dates fell during the week, including a filing deadline for opponents of the controversial individual mandate. Here are some the amicus briefs we filed supporting the Respondents on the Minimum Coverage Provision Issue (and you can find links to each [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/cockle-printing%e2%80%99s-healthcare-litigation-forum-14/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Professors Duel at the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/supreme-court/ucla-law-professors-duel-at-the-supreme-court</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/supreme-court/ucla-law-professors-duel-at-the-supreme-court#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shon R. Hopwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eugene volokh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Varat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA law school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States v. Alvarez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. Alvarez. At issue in this case is whether the Stolen Valor Act, 18 U.S.C. § 704(b)&#8211;which makes it a crime to falsely represent that you have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the Armed Forces of the United States&#8211;is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/supreme-court/ucla-law-professors-duel-at-the-supreme-court/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Man: My Story of Robbing Banks, Winning Supreme Court Cases, and Finding Redemption</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/books/law-man-my-story-of-robbing-banks-winning-supreme-court-cases-and-finding-redemption</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/books/law-man-my-story-of-robbing-banks-winning-supreme-court-cases-and-finding-redemption#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shon R. Hopwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crown Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Man: My Story of Robbing Banks Winning Supreme Court Cases and Finding Redemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of you who read the CockleBur frequently know that I have a memoir that Crown/Random House is publishing. Well, we now have a definitive publication date: August 7th. Annie and I will be busy between now and then promoting the book from a number of angles. If major promotional stuff comes up, I will [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/books/law-man-my-story-of-robbing-banks-winning-supreme-court-cases-and-finding-redemption/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Merits Briefs Filed by Cockle Printing</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/new-merits-briefs-filed-by-cockle-printing-16</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/new-merits-briefs-filed-by-cockle-printing-16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Cockle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brief for Respondent in Jackson v. Hobbs, No. 10-9647, filed on February 14, 2012 Brief of Respondent in Miller v. Alabama, No. 10-9646, filed on February 14, 2012 Petitioners’ Reply Brief in Elgin v. Dept. of the Treasury, No. 11-45, filed on February 15, 2012]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/new-merits-briefs-filed-by-cockle-printing-16/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise and Decline of Miranda</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/the-rise-and-decline-of-miranda</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/the-rise-and-decline-of-miranda#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shon R. Hopwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely dropped the ball on this one. Back in October, University of Michigan Law Professor Yale Kamisar came to UW to talk about Miranda. If you have gone to law school in the past two or three decades, you have probably heard of the professor. His Modern Criminal Procedure book is the standard bearer [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/the-rise-and-decline-of-miranda/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Son’s First Sadness</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/my-sons-first-sadness</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/my-sons-first-sadness#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shon R. Hopwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Hopwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebecca Richards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people have their first children, they tend to remember the big things, like first steps, words, bumps on the head. Me, I tend to remember the little things. My son, Mark, usually has two standard emotions. When well fed, rested and receiving attention, he is generally a happy kid. When hungry, tired, or sick of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/my-sons-first-sadness/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Arguments But No Briefs</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/supreme-court/oral-arguments-but-no-briefs</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/supreme-court/oral-arguments-but-no-briefs#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 05:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shon R. Hopwood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David C. Frederick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gibbons v. Ogden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court and Appellate Advocacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In between reading gems, such as first-year law school textbooks, I&#8217;ve been reading David C. Frederick&#8217;s book, Supreme Court And Appellate Advocacy. The book starts with a historical narrative of the Supreme Court. Surprisingly, the first decades of Supreme Court practice were geared around oral argument, and not written briefs. In fact, there were no written briefs! And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/supreme-court/oral-arguments-but-no-briefs/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The due process debate continues</title>
		<link>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/the-due-process-debate-continues</link>
		<comments>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/the-due-process-debate-continues#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Sandefur</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thecocklebur.com/?p=2821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The discussion over my article, In Defense of Substantive Due Process, is continuing at Cato Unbound. Prof. Gary Lawson has posted his response here, and now the general discussion is beginning. I responded to David Bernstein’s questions this morning, and I’ll have some further thoughts soon. Please join the discussion! Update: Is my position true [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thecocklebur.com/uncategorized/the-due-process-debate-continues/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

