<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Future Buzz</title>
	
	<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com</link>
	<description>Adam Singer on social media, marketing, PR and creating buzz online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:49:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheFutureBuzz" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">TheFutureBuzz</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>The Myth Of Multitasking:  Focus Or Fail</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/13/focus-or-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/13/focus-or-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone" title="focus" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/focus.png" alt="" width="580" height="130" />
Focusing is underrated, and has been for quite some time.  Yet it's the secret to great work.  Twitter, email, phone calls, instant messages, aimless web browsing - they are all distractions and ultimately collateral tasks.  They constantly call for your attention but they don't make a real difference in accomplishing objectives from a production standpoint.  And if you're not a prolific producer, you're never going to be successful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="focus" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/focus.png" alt="" width="580" height="130" /><br />
Focusing is underrated, and has been for quite some time.  Yet it&#8217;s the secret to great work.  Twitter, email, phone calls, instant messages, web browsing &#8211; they are all distractions and ultimately collateral tasks.  They constantly call for your attention but they don&#8217;t make a real difference in accomplishing objectives from a production standpoint.  And if you&#8217;re not a prolific producer, you&#8217;re never going to be successful.</p>
<p>No doubt, you have real work and serious projects that you want to get done &#8211; both personally and professionally.  Finishing those projects is what brings the highest degree of satisfaction from life.  Even for projects that will ultimately end up on the web, in many cases unplugging is necessary to get the best results.</p>
<p>As an artist and a blogger, I do several things before starting work on an idea:  I close Firefox, turn off my cell phone and eliminate all outside distractions.  There is simply no other way to get solid writing completed, it is imperative to focus 100% of your attention on it.  It&#8217;s like that in any project that you want to be successful and ultimately of high quality.</p>
<p>Multitasking is a myth, really you are accomplishing nothing even if you are getting work done because it will be sub-par.  And, there&#8217;s no point to completing projects that are sub-par in the first place.  If you want to do anything that you will actually be proud of after completion, it&#8217;s all about focusing.</p>
<p>Also, there is no sense in being more productive to produce results anyone else can.  If you&#8217;re doing that, you&#8217;re relatively dispensable.  There&#8217;s just no value in it.  If you&#8217;re a digital content producer, finishing content just to finish it without focus behind it will create results that get skipped over.  Quality, not quantity wins in the game of infinite choices.</p>
<p>Unfortunately focusing is a lost art, especially in my generation.  I&#8217;ve previously shared my <a href="../2009/01/02/gen-y-observations/">observations on Gen Y</a> &#8211; but something not discussed in that thread was the fact that our generation grew up multitasking.  We grew up working on projects and studying while browsing the web, eating dinner, and talking with our peers.  I only learned <a href="../2009/05/29/how-audio-production-taught-me-self-discipline/">self-discipline</a> later in life, but I had to unlearn the habits I acquired growing up multitasking.  You don&#8217;t have much to gain from it, because while you may <em>feel</em> like you&#8217;re getting more done, the results of your efforts suffer.</p>
<p>Some other thoughts on focusing&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Kill the sense of urgency, focus on creating inspiration/motivation instead<br />
</strong></p>
<p>Too many people have a false sense of urgency with what they&#8217;re doing and pretty much life itself.  That sense of urgency perpetuates a loss of focus.  Urgency is not productivity, nor a motivator for the best results -  inspiration and motivation are far better.</p>
<p><strong>Good marketing is the ability to get people to focus</strong></p>
<p>Too much marketing is centered on the quick fix, the how can I interrupt you for 30 seconds.  Instead of trying to always win quick bits of attention, <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/05/15/what-if/">what if</a> you engaged in content marketing to actually forge a relationship with your audience over time.  That would be a far more effective strategy.  You only get focused attention from people you&#8217;ve built permission with.</p>
<p><strong>Carve out as much time during you day for focused work as possible</strong></p>
<p>This work is what leads to productivity, fulfillment and ultimately happiness.  The collateral things are easy and anyone can do them, it&#8217;s the focused, unique work that&#8217;s valuable.</p>
<p><strong>Focusing kills <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/27/overthinking/">overthinking</a></strong></p>
<p>By focusing on one thing, you&#8217;ll stop overthinking because your mind will have direction and purpose.  Focus destroys the unfortunate by-product of &#8220;too much to do&#8221; by forcing you to take yourself to task with what is at hand.  Your focus will cause you to take <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/05/04/the-first-step/">the first step</a>, concurrently the hardest and most difficult of any project.</p>
<p><strong>Focus is like a muscle</strong></p>
<p>The more time you spend focused, the stronger this ability will get.  If you regularly force yourself to focus on something &#8211; anything &#8211; on a consistent basis, the ability to focus on all else in your life will become easier.</p>
<p><strong>Focusing is how you enter a <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/02/04/momentum-and-the-flow-experience/">flow experience</a></strong></p>
<p>A funny thing happens once you focus yourself on a task you excel at.  Bearing you&#8217;re passionate about it, you&#8217;ll inevitably enter a flow experience, where everything outside of your task ceases to exist, and you have consciously and unconsciously committed yourself to it.  A flow experience is effortless, but it is only achieved through that initial focus.</p>
<p>Let the multi-taskers lose their time bit by bit, and instead learn to focus and ultimately produce better results on everything you do.</p>
<p><strong>Related posts  from The Future Buzz</strong></p>
<p><a href="../2009/04/07/ignoring-others-to-achieve-your-potential/">Ignoring Others Is Necessary To Reach Your Potential</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/05/accessing-your-creative-reserves/">Accessing Your Creative Reserves</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/03/28/inspirational-quotes-remixed/">Inspirational Quotes Remixed</a></p>
<p><strong>Related posts from around the web</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pluginid.com/productive-month/">Why Last Month Was The Most Productive Of My Life</a> (Plugin ID)</p>
<p><a href="http://zenhabits.net/2008/03/the-magical-power-of-focus/">The Magical Power of Focus</a> (Zen Habits)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.positivityblog.com/index.php/2009/05/08/where-is-your-precious-focus-going-today/">Where is Your Precious Focus Going Today?</a> (The Positivity Blog)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheFutureBuzz/~4/QwipyuqkwIg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/13/focus-or-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Future Marketing Trends – By The Numbers</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/10/future-marketing-trends/</link>
		<comments>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/10/future-marketing-trends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future marketing trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone" title="future marketing trends" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/Future-Marketing-Trends.png" alt="" width="580" height="130" />
Numbers, stats and trends move fast online and are in a near constant state of flux.  Following up my post on <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/01/12/social-media-web-20-internet-numbers-stats/">social media stats</a>, we're past-due for 2009's second by-the-numbers look at the web here at The Future Buzz.

I know you're busy, but also interested in marketing trends.  Let's simplify them for you by providing just the figures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="future marketing trends" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/Future-Marketing-Trends.png" alt="" width="580" height="130" /><br />
Numbers, stats and trends move fast online and are in a near constant state of flux.  Following up my post on <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/01/12/social-media-web-20-internet-numbers-stats/">social media stats</a>, we&#8217;re past-due for 2009&#8217;s second by-the-numbers look at the web here at The Future Buzz.</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re busy, but also interested in marketing trends.  Let&#8217;s simplify them for you by providing just the figures.</p>
<h3><strong>Future Marketing Trends &#8211; By The Numbers</strong></h3>
<h2><strong>Marketing spends</strong></h2>
<p><strong>$55 billion -</strong> number of dollars marketers will spend on interactive (display, mobile, email, social, search) channels by 2014</p>
<p><strong>21% &#8211; </strong>percentage<strong> </strong>of all marketing spends that the 55 billion figure will represent</p>
<p><strong>7.8 billion -</strong> amount marketers will spend on display advertising in 2009</p>
<p><strong>$15.3 billion</strong> &#8211; amount marketers will spend on search marketing in 2009</p>
<p><strong>$716 million</strong> &#8211; amount marketers will spend on social media marketing in 2009</p>
<p><strong>4%</strong> &#8211; percentage of budget allocated to social media as compared to search in 2009</p>
<p><strong>9%</strong> &#8211; amount this number will grow to by 2014</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2009/07/the-decline-of-advertising-and-the-rise-of-social-media/">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>$585 million </strong>amount in 2008 marketers spent on MySpace ads</p>
<p><strong>$210 million</strong> amount marketers spent in 2008 on Facebook ads</p>
<p><strong>9% </strong>- amount Facebook&#8217;s ad revenue will grow in 2009</p>
<p><strong>15% &#8211; </strong>amount MySpace&#8217;s ad revenue will fall in 2009</p>
<p><span id="ctl00_EMarketerContentPH_lblBody">(<a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007165">source</a>)</span></p>
<h2><strong><span>Twitter by the numbers<br />
</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span>21% &#8211; </span></strong><span>number of Twitter accounts that are empty placeholders</span></p>
<p><strong>94% &#8211; </strong>number of Twitter accounts with less than 100 followers</p>
<p><strong>5% &#8211; </strong>percentage of users who make up a staggering 3/4 of all Twitter activity (<a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html">participation inequality</a>)</p>
<p><strong>Tuesday</strong> &#8211; the most popular day on Twitter (not a number but still an interesting fact)</p>
<p><strong>62% &#8211; </strong>percentage of Twitter users from the US</p>
<p>(<a href="http://rohitbhargava.typepad.com/weblog/2009/07/10-stunning-and-useful-stats-about-twitter.html">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>2.56 billion</strong> &#8211; number of Tweets at the time of posting this (<a href="http://popacular.com/gigatweet/">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>22.99 million </strong>- number of unique visitors to Twitter.com in June of 2009 (<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/twitter.com/">source</a>)</p>
<h2><strong>Facebook</strong> by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>200 million &#8211; </strong>updated<strong> </strong>number of active Facebook users</p>
<p><strong>30 million </strong>-number of those active users who access Facebook via mobile device</p>
<p><strong>100 million </strong>- number of Facebook users who log in daily</p>
<p><strong>66%</strong> &#8211; percentage of Facebook users who are outside of college</p>
<p><strong>120 &#8211; </strong>average number of friends per user</p>
<p><strong>900 million</strong> &#8211; average number of photos uploaded to the site monthly</p>
<p><strong>10 million </strong>- number of videos uploaded each month</p>
<p><strong>1 billion &#8211; </strong>number of pieces of content (web links, news stories, blog posts, notes, photos, etc.) shared each week</p>
<p><strong>2.5 million </strong>- number of events created monthly</p>
<p><strong>70% &#8211; </strong>number of Facebook users who live <em>outside</em> the US</p>
<p><strong>950,000 &#8211; </strong>number of developers and entrepreneurs leveraging the Facebook platform</p>
<p><strong>100 &#8211; </strong>number of applications that have more than 1 million active users</p>
<p><strong>10,000</strong> &#8211; number of websites using Facebook connect</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics">source</a>)</p>
<h2><strong>LinkedIn by the numbers<br />
</strong></h2>
<p><strong>41</strong> &#8211; average age of user</p>
<p><strong>$109,703</strong> &#8211; average household income</p>
<p><strong>53.5%</strong> &#8211; percentage of users with that $100k+  household income</p>
<p><strong>64%</strong> &#8211; percentage of site made up of male users</p>
<p><strong>34%</strong> &#8211; percentage who own a smartphone</p>
<p><strong>80.1%</strong> &#8211; percent of college/post grad users</p>
<p><strong>49%</strong> &#8211; percent of site made up of &#8220;decision makers&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>6.5% </strong>- percent of users who are an EVP/SVP/VP</p>
<p><strong>24%</strong> &#8211; percentage of users who have a Portfolio Value of $250k+</p>
<p><strong>2.3 million</strong> &#8211; number of users who have more than 3 PC&#8217;s in their home</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.slideshare.net/nkievman/linkedin-stats-by-linkedsecretscom">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>12.44 million</strong> &#8211; number of unique visitors in June, 2009 (<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/linkedin.com/">source</a>)</p>
<h2>Web Video by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>31% </strong>- percentage of videos viewed on a Google-owned sites</p>
<p>(<a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/01/17/need-to-know-web-video-stats-traffic-rentals-revenues-ugc/">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>10.1 million</strong> &#8211; number of unique views on Hulu in April, 2009 according to Nielsen</p>
<p><strong>10 billion &#8211; </strong>number of video streams in May, 2009, up <strong>35%</strong> over last year</p>
<p><strong>75.1 million</strong> &#8211; number of streams per viewer per month, up <strong>20%</strong> over last year</p>
<p><strong>6.05 billion</strong> &#8211; number of total streams YouTube served to 95.4 million uniques in May, 2009</p>
<p>(<a href="http://newteevee.com/2009/06/15/nielsen-video-stats-a-jumble-viewers-up-13-from-last-year/">source</a>)</p>
<h2>Search by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>13.104 billion </strong>- number of search engine queries in February of 2009</p>
<p><strong>8.293 billion </strong>- number of searches which happened in Google-owned sites</p>
<p><strong>2.696 billion </strong>- number of searches on Yahoo! sites</p>
<p><strong>1.073 billion</strong> &#8211; number of searches on Microsoft sites</p>
<p><strong>63.3%</strong> &#8211; percentage share of core searches which happened on Google sites</p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2009/3/US_Search_Engine_Ranking">source</a>)</p>
<h2>FriendFeed by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>43,361 </strong>- number of subscribers <a href="http://friendfeed.com/scobleizer">Robert Scoble</a>, the most popular FriendFeeder has.  He&#8217;s also the 112th most active user (at the time of posting this).</p>
<p><strong>930</strong> &#8211; number of subscribers <a href="http://friendfeed.com/faboomama">Anika Malone</a>, the most active FriendFeed user has.  She has 29,967 comments and 22,980 likes.</p>
<p><strong>7,509</strong> &#8211; number of subscribers the most popular room on FriendFeed has <strong> </strong><a href="http://friendfeed.com/rww">RWW: The Future of Tech </a></p>
<p>(<a href="http://www.ffholic.com/">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>1 million- </strong>number of unique visitors FriendFeed eclipsed in May, 2009</p>
<p>(<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/friendfeed.com/">source</a>)</p>
<h2>Wikipedia by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>65 million </strong>- approximate number of visitors attracted monthly as of 2009</p>
<p><strong>75,000 </strong>- number of active contributors</p>
<p><strong>1,669 &#8211; </strong>number of site administrators<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>13 million</strong> &#8211; number of articles those contributors have worked on</p>
<p><strong>260</strong> – the number of languages articles have been written in on Wikipedia</p>
<p><strong>318.75 million</strong><strong> &#8211; </strong>total number of edits made to Wikipedia pages</p>
<h2>Blogs by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>133,000,000</strong> – number of blogs indexed by Technorati since 2002</p>
<p><strong>346,000,000 – </strong>number of people globally who read blogs (comScore March 2008)</p>
<p><strong>900,000</strong> – average number of blog posts in a 24 hour period</p>
<p><strong>3.33 million</strong>– number of RSS subscribers to <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.techcrunch.com');" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/">TechCrunch</a>, the most popular Technology blog (July, 2009)</p>
<p><strong>77% </strong>- percentage of active Internet users who read blogs</p>
<p><strong>81 </strong>- number<strong> </strong>of languages represented in the blogosphere</p>
<p><strong>59%</strong> – percentage of bloggers who have been blogging for at least 2 years</p>
<p>(same <a href="http://technorati.com/blogging/state-of-the-blogosphere/">source</a> as the last roundup)</p>
<h2>Digg by the numbers</h2>
<p><strong>38.9 million</strong> &#8211; number of uniques Digg attracted in June, 2009 (<a href="http://siteanalytics.compete.com/digg.com/">source</a>)</p>
<p><strong>56% </strong>- percentage of frontpage allegedly controlled by top 100 users <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digg"></a></p>
<p><strong>20</strong> &#8211; number of individuals who allegedly control 25% of frontpage content</p>
<p>(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digg">source</a>)</p>
<p>If there are any numbers specifically you want to see in future versions of these, let me know and I&#8217;ll try and find them.</p>
<p><strong>Related posts from The Future Buzz</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/18/97-images-the-web-shared-in-2008/">97 Images The Web Shared In 2008</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/21/marketing-lists/">42 Marketing Lists From The Future Buzz</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/12/05/the-two-kinds-of-web-popularity/">The Two Kinds Of Web Popularity</a></p>
<p><strong>Related posts from around the web</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2009/03/social-media-marketing-tops-digital-marketing-tactics-for-2009/">Social Media Marketing Tops Digital Marketing Tactics for 2009</a> (TopRank Blog)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.briansolis.com/2009/07/the-decline-of-advertising-and-the-rise-of-social-media/">The Decline of Traditional Advertising and the Rise of Social Media</a> (PR 2.0)</p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.beingpeterkim.com/">A Wiki of Social Media Marketing Examples</a> (Peter Kim)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheFutureBuzz/~4/KaEqN-7jX6c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/10/future-marketing-trends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links For 7-7-09</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/07/links-for-7-7-09/</link>
		<comments>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/07/links-for-7-7-09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[links, quick bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two quick links to check out today:
<ul>
	<li>A post on TopRank's (my employer's) blog on <a href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2009/07/creative-commons-license-marketing-tool/">using a creative commons license as a marketing tool</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>I face-off against <a href="http://marketing.fm">Eric Friedman</a> on <a href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/bloggers-face-off-adam-singer-vs-eric-friedman/">Daily Blog Tips blogger face-off</a></li>
</ul>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two quick links to check out today:</p>
<ul>
<li>A post on TopRank&#8217;s (my employer&#8217;s) blog on <a href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2009/07/creative-commons-license-marketing-tool/">using a creative commons license as a marketing tool</a></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>I face-off against <a href="http://marketing.fm">Eric Friedman</a> on <a href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/bloggers-face-off-adam-singer-vs-eric-friedman/">Daily Blog Tips blogger face-off</a></li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheFutureBuzz/~4/k-jQqSpO3ys" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/07/links-for-7-7-09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Become A Beacon On The Digital Landscape</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/05/beacon-digital-landscape/</link>
		<comments>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/05/beacon-digital-landscape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 15:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Social Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img class="alignnone" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/lighthouse/lighthouse.png" alt="" width="399" height="263" />
A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beacon">beacon</a> is <em>an intentionally conspicuous </em>device designed to focus attention on a specific location.

Visualize what image the word beacon conjures in your mind:  perhaps a lighthouse casting light onto an otherwise dark horizon, or a signal fire atop a hill illuminating the night sky.  In the physical world, a beacon is used to draw attention, act as a guide, or call to action.  Civilizations have long used beacons to rally citizens together, protect ships from coastlines, and act as signal points.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/lighthouse/lighthouse.png" alt="" width="399" height="263" /><br />
A <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beacon">beacon</a> is <em>an intentionally conspicuous </em>device designed to focus attention on a specific location.</p>
<p>Visualize what image the word beacon conjures in your mind:  perhaps a lighthouse casting light onto an otherwise dark horizon, or a signal fire atop a hill illuminating the night sky.  In the physical world, a beacon is used to draw attention, act as a guide, or call to action.  Civilizations have long used them to rally citizens together, protect ships from coastlines, and act as signal points.</p>
<p>But the concept of a beacon is not limited to purely physical signaling points.  There are beacons on the web &#8211; they are people, companies, networks, blogs, anything that can direct attention.</p>
<p>You must become a beacon or you are essentially at the whim of others who point attention at their own discretion, perhaps shining the light on you for fleeting moments&#8230;if you&#8217;re lucky.  Far better to become an arbiter of attention in your industry or niche rather than forfeit this to others.</p>
<p>The lighthouse example strikes me as the type of beacon most analogous to the web.  A lighthouse works by passing light through a system of lenses, focusing and directing the signal, as illustrated in the image below:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://thefuturebuzz.com/pics/fresnel-lens.png" alt="" width="501" height="301" /><br />
<em>(<a href="http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/EarthSeaAndSky/SeaAndAirTransport/Lighthouses/en ">source</a> : </em>Helen Beaglehole. &#8216;Lighthouses&#8217;, Te Ara &#8211; the Encyclopedia of New Zealand)</p>
<p>This is similar to how beacons function online.  The only difference is constructing an amplification lens to spread your messages on the web is less of an exact science than the manufacturing of a lighthouse lens &#8211; it is a far more fluid process that must be ongoing.  This is because the amplification lens is made up of your network, search engines and social areas of the web &#8211; things that are in a constant state of flux.</p>
<blockquote><p>The fastest way to amp up the worth of your own network is to bring smaller networks together with it so they can act as one larger network and gain the total n<sup>2</sup> value.<br />
<a href="http://www.kk.org/newrules/blog/2009/06/coordinate-smaller-webs-1.php">&#8211;Kevin Kelly</a></p></blockquote>
<p>A strategic, precise approach (the directed lens) is more effective than a diffusive presence.  Imagine a coastline with thousands of lighthouses all casting diffused light in all directions &#8211; yet one is pouring focused light in only one direction.  To all ships traveling down that path, it would be obvious where to go.  Without specific, directed amplification, the light cast from a lighthouse is useless.  Same with your messages.  This speaks to the <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/04/17/value-of-your-network/">real value of your network</a> and is why bigger is not better, a razor sharp approach is far more effective at accomplishing specific goals.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">If damaged, light amplification lenses in lighthouses are almost impossible to repair, and upkeep is time-intensive.  This is true on the web as well, speaking to the importance of maintaining a strong <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/02/28/digital-reputation/">digital reputation</a>.</span></p>
<p>The source of light (your communications) matters too.  The amplification lens you create is only going to work with certain messages.  As the architect of your network, you will <a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/03/05/rapid-growth-formula/">find your formula</a> and direct it through the lens each time for maximum impact.</p>
<p><strong>Only room for so many beacons<br />
</strong></p>
<p>User attention does not scale, yet the number of those attempting to become beacons of information and ideas is going up.  But not everyone can become a beacon due to the very nature of what defines one &#8211; that it must be glaringly noticeable.  Following the lighthouse analogy, what this means is:</p>
<ul>
<li>You must construct the most directed, effective amplification lens possible</li>
<li>Always feed the right content through the lens</li>
<li>Remember, the internet is closer to an organic network than anything else, so the lens must undergo a fluid, continuous development process</li>
<li>An ultra-high signal to noise ratio must be maintained &#8211; do not attempt amplification of irrelevant messages</li>
<li>Protect the lens at all costs, it is extremely difficult to regain if lost</li>
<li>Strengthen/sharpen the lens regularly</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Related posts from The Future Buzz</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/11/07/social-media-is-like-the-matrix/">Social Media Is Like The Matrix</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/12/04/5-reasons-you-should-learn-social-media/">5 Reasons You Should Learn About Social Media</a></p>
<p><a href="http://thefuturebuzz.com/2008/12/05/the-two-kinds-of-web-popularity/">The Two Kinds Of Web Popularity</a></p>
<p><strong>Related posts from around the web</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketing.fm/2009/07/03/the-power-of-now-and-the-strategy-of-soon/">The Power of Now and the strategy of soon</a> (Marketing.FM)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conversationagent.com/2009/06/social-media-program-lifecycle.html">Social Media Program Lifecycle</a> (Conversation Agent)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.timjahn.com/blog/06/30/2009/how-do-you-become-new-original-and-louder-everyone-else">How do you become new, original, and louder than everyone else?</a> (Tim Jahn)</p>
<p><em>Post image provided by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.shutterstock.com">Shutterstock</a>, royalty-free subscription stock photography and vector art.</em></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheFutureBuzz/~4/ICpY80_t-h4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/07/05/beacon-digital-landscape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need Some Tips To Help Your Blog Stand Out?</title>
		<link>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/30/tips-to-help-your-blog-stand-out/</link>
		<comments>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/30/tips-to-help-your-blog-stand-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links, quick bits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefuturebuzz.com/?p=4431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Start by following these steps:

1.  Develop a post archetype
2. Create a simple or unique design
3.  Refine your writing quality and style
4.  Find a way to view your topic from a fresh angle or different lens
5.  Focus on a unique topic, or intersection of topics
6.  Create a better signal to noise ratio
7.  Focus on achieving consistency

Check out the full post at the Online Marketing Blog on <a href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2009/06/7-ways-to-develop-a-unique-brand-for-your-blog/">7 ways to develop a unique brand for your blog</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start by following these steps:</p>
<p>1.  Develop a post archetype<br />
2. Create a simple or unique design<br />
3.  Refine your writing quality and style<br />
4.  Find a way to view your topic from a fresh angle or different lens<br />
5.  Focus on a unique topic, or intersection of topics<br />
6.  Create a better signal to noise ratio<br />
7.  Focus on achieving consistency</p>
<p>Check out the full post at the Online Marketing Blog on <a href="http://www.toprankblog.com/2009/06/7-ways-to-develop-a-unique-brand-for-your-blog/">7 ways to develop a unique brand for your blog</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheFutureBuzz/~4/DHryOhBHhCo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thefuturebuzz.com/2009/06/30/tips-to-help-your-blog-stand-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.251 seconds -->
