The Hamiltonian Inc.

Before the Ballot- with Ward 2 Councillor Candidate Tony Sciara

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 05:07:01 +0000

Welcome to this edition of Before the Ballot- with Ward 2 Councillor Candidate Tony Sciara.

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

Hamilton’s best days are still ahead—and I’m running for City Council because I believe we have a unique opportunity to shape that future together. Born and raised in Hamilton, I have built my life and career here, and this city is more than my hometown—it is a community I deeply care about and believe in. I have always been passionate about Hamilton’s growth and potential. With our hardworking people, strong community spirit, and unique geographic advantages, I believe Hamilton can be one of Canada’s great cities.

As a lifelong entrepreneur and engaged citizen, I have seen both the opportunities before us and the challenges holding us back. With strong leadership, a clear vision, and a focus on residents’ priorities, I believe we can achieve far more. That is why I am running for City Council. I want to help build a safer, stronger, and more prosperous Hamilton—one that supports local businesses, creates opportunities for families, and inspires pride in our community. I believe now is the time for leadership that listens, collaborates, and delivers results for the people of Hamilton.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

As a resident of Ward 2, I have spent a great deal of time speaking with neighbors, business owners, and community members. What I have found is that their concerns are my concerns. The three issues I hear about most often are homelessness and encampments, community safety, and the struggles facing many local businesses.

First, we must address homelessness with both compassion and accountability. We need to work closely with community organizations, social service agencies, healthcare providers, and all levels of government to ensure people have access to the support and housing they need, while also maintaining safe, clean, and accessible public spaces for everyone.

Second, residents deserve to feel safe in their neighborhoods. Public safety is a fundamental responsibility of government. I will advocate for stronger collaboration between the city, Hamilton Police, community organizations, and residents to address crime, improve neighborhood safety, and ensure our streets, parks, and public spaces are welcoming for families, seniors, and visitors alike.

Third, our local businesses need support. Small businesses are the backbone of our local economy, yet many are struggling. I will champion policies that encourage investment, reduce unnecessary barriers, and create an environment where businesses can thrive. That includes exploring targeted incentives, streamlining processes where possible, and actively promoting Hamilton as a destination for new investment and job creation.

Before we can attract new investment and growth, we must first address the challenges that residents see every day. By improving safety, addressing homelessness, and creating a stronger business environment, we can restore confidence in Ward 2 and build a community that residents are proud of.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

Municipal government is about making decisions that have a direct impact on people’s daily lives. Whether it’s public safety, infrastructure, housing, parks, or city services, every decision must be made with the best interests of residents in mind.

When faced with difficult decisions at City Hall, I would begin by listening. I believe residents, business owners, community organizations, and subject matter experts all have valuable perspectives that deserve to be heard. Good decisions come from understanding the facts, considering the long-term impact, and being open to different viewpoints.

As a lifelong entrepreneur, I understand the importance of responsible budgeting and accountability. Every tax dollar represents money that residents and businesses have worked hard to earn. I will carefully evaluate spending, prioritize essential services, and ensure that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and effectively. There will be times when competing interests make decisions challenging. In those situations, I will focus on what delivers the greatest overall benefit to the community while remaining fair, transparent, and accountable. Even when residents may not agree with every decision, they deserve to know that those decisions were made thoughtfully, honestly, and with the community’s best interests at heart. My approach is simple: listen carefully, study the facts, respect taxpayers, and make decisions based on what will strengthen Hamilton today and for future generations.

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

What distinguishes me from many other candidates is the combination of my business experience, community connections, and proven ability to work with people from all walks of life.

As a lifelong entrepreneur and businessman, I understand the challenges of managing budgets, creating opportunities, solving problems, and making difficult decisions. In business, success requires accountability, sound judgment, and the ability to deliver results—qualities I will bring to City Hall.

My career in the entertainment industry has also provided me with unique experiences and relationships that have allowed me to work with a wide range of individuals, organizations, and community leaders. It has taught me the importance of communication, collaboration, and bringing people together around a common goal. Perhaps most importantly, I bring a deep love for Hamilton and a genuine commitment to its future. I was born and raised here, and I care deeply about the success of our city and the well-being of its residents.

I am determined, patient, and practical in my approach to leadership. I believe in listening before acting, building consensus where possible, and making thoughtful, prudent decisions that serve the best interests of taxpayers and the community as a whole. At a time when many residents feel frustrated and unheard, I offer a fresh perspective, real-world experience, and a commitment to putting the people of Ward 2 first. My goal is not simply to hold office—it is to help restore confidence in local government and contribute to building a safer, stronger, and more prosperous Hamilton.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

Email: bringhamiltonback@gmail.com
Phone number: 905-933-8669
Or drop into the office: Working on that, will keep you posted.
Thank you for reaching out….
All the best’
Tony Sciara

Thank-you Tony for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Traction in Action with Mayoral Candidate Sasha Austin

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:25:56 +0000

Welcome to this edition of Traction in Action, with candidates driving toward being elected. In this instalment- Mayoral candidate Sasha Austin.

Hamilton Public Library board public session.
West Harbour Site - Vision committee.

Traction In Action- With Ward 9 Councillor Candidate Brad Stapleton

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:38:52 +0000

Quality time with my son playing Sledge Hockey with the Hamilton Sledgehammers!

Brad Stapleton

Before the Ballot- Candidate's Guide - The Single Most Important Thing a Campaign Can Do

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:20:31 +0000

At a recent team meeting, we discussed how frequently we should publish new instalments of Before the Ballot: The Candidate's Guide. Some felt we may have been releasing them a little too often, while others believed the current pace was just right.

What was interesting, however, was that there was complete agreement on one thing: this particular instalment needs to be published now and emphasized repeatedly throughout the campaign season.

In fact, we believe this may be the single most important advisory piece in the entire series for anyone serious about getting elected. It is a lesson that should be taken to heart immediately and revisited often as voting day approaches.

Before the Ballot: Pulling the Vote — The Single Most Important Thing a Campaign Can Do

Many first-time candidates spend months focused on signs, websites, social media posts, endorsements, literature, debates, fundraising, and media coverage. All of those things matter.

None of them matter as much as pulling the vote.What Is Pulling the Vote?

Pulling the vote refers to the organized effort to ensure that identified supporters actually cast a ballot.

Campaign veterans understand a simple truth: Support that never reaches the ballot box is worthless.

Imagine a household of four people who fully support your campaign. They intend to vote for you. Election day arrives, but life intervenes. A neighbour asks for help moving furniture. An unexpected family obligation arises. Plans change. The day gets away from them. Before they know it, voting hours have passed.

Perhaps that example is not typical. Some people are highly engaged and will vote no matter what. But many others will not. Municipal elections often experience relatively low voter turnout. Good intentions do not always translate into ballots cast.And that reality matters.

The Great Illusion

Every election contains candidates who are convinced they are winning.They have signs everywhere. People recognize them.Their events are well attended. Their social media engagement is strong. Residents tell them they are doing a great job.

Then election night arrives and they lose.

What happened? In many cases, their supporters never voted.Meanwhile, another campaign quietly identified supporters, contacted them repeatedly, reminded them to vote, helped them navigate the voting process, and ensured they cast a ballot.

The second campaign wins.Not necessarily because it was more popular. Because it was more organized.

The Difference Between a Supporter and a Voter

One of the most expensive mistakes campaigns make is assuming that support equals turnout.

It does not. A supporter who forgets to vote is not a vote.A supporter who intends to vote but gets busy is not a vote. A supporter who leaves town is not a vote.A supporter who encounters difficulties voting is not a vote.The only thing that counts is a ballot cast.

The Real Purpose of Canvassing

Many candidates believe canvassing is primarily about persuasion.It is.But it is also about identification. Every door knocked should help answer one question: Will this person vote for me?

Campaigns should be building lists throughout the election:
Supporter
Likely Supporter
Undecided
Opponent

Election day should never be spent guessing. Election day should be spent executing a plan.

Election Day Is Not One Day

The best campaigns begin planning their vote-pull operation months in advance.By election day they already know:Who their supporters are. Where those supporters live.How to contact them.Whether they require reminders.Whether they require transportation.Whether they have already voted through advance polls

Election day becomes less about campaigning and more about mobilization. The campaign is no longer trying to persuade. It is trying to activate.

The Forgotten Power of Advance Voting

Many campaigns overlook advance polls.That is a mistake.Every supporter who votes early is one less supporter the campaign must worry about on election day.Experienced campaigns aggressively encourage advance voting whenever possible.

They view every early vote as one more task completed.

The Phone Call That Wins Elections

Somewhere in almost every election there is a phone call that changes the outcome. A volunteer contacts a supporter who forgot to vote.A candidate personally reaches out to a resident who intended to vote after dinner.A campaign arranges transportation for a senior who otherwise would not have made it to the polls. One vote rarely decides an election.But dozens often can. And those dozens are frequently found through simple, persistent follow-up.

Data Wins Elections

Campaigns frequently spend thousands of dollars on visible things. Signs. Brochures. Advertising. Promotional materials.

Yet the most valuable asset in many campaigns is invisible. Data.Knowing who supports you.Knowing who does not.Knowing who remains undecided.Knowing who has voted.Knowing who has not.Information allows campaigns to deploy resources effectively.Without information, campaigns are operating largely on instinct.

The Last Forty-Eight Hours

The final two days of a campaign can be decisive.This is where organization separates itself from enthusiasm.

Supporters should be contacted.Volunteers should be mobilized.Transportation plans should be finalized. Poll captains should be organized.Reminder systems should be activated. Every identified supporter should be on someone's list. No serious campaign should wake up on election day wondering what to do.

The Hard Truth

Many candidates lose elections they could have won.Not because voters rejected them.Not because they lacked qualifications.Not because they were outworked.They lose because they failed to convert support into votes.

There is an enormous difference between being well-liked and being elected. One feels good.The other wins elections.

Final Thoughts

Political observers often focus on speeches, debates, controversies, endorsements, fundraising totals, and lawn signs.Campaign professionals often focus on something else entirely:Turnout.

If you are reading this and are suddenly nervous and anxious about running, don't be. Articles like this are meant to equip you. You can do this!

This article is part of The Hamiltonian's ongoing "Before the Ballot: The Candidate's Guide" series examining the realities, strategies, and challenges of municipal election campaigns.

Article of the Moment

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:39:01 +0000

Thanks to our friends at The Hamilton Spectator for publishing this piece in today's paper , penned by our Publisher, Cal DiFalco.

Before the Ballot- with Ward 15 Candidate Zac Wrobel

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:32:26 +0000

Welcome to this edition Before the Ballot- with Ward 15 Candidate Zac Wrobel.

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

I have been a resident of Hamilton since 2012 and moved to our current home in 2020 shortly after welcoming our daughter. Since then, I have become more involved in the community and gained a greater appreciation for the incredible area we live in. At the same time, I have reflected on how much our local environment and leadership impact not only today’s residents, but also the next generation growing up here.

As a husband, father, and resident, I felt a responsibility to invest in my daughter’s future and educate myself on the issues affecting our city. I am not a career politician — I am someone who believes residents deserve stronger representation, greater accountability, and a clearer understanding of where their record-high tax dollars are being spent. I believe now is the right time for leadership that is connected to the community and focused on practical results for residents.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

Ward 15 is one of the most unique wards in Hamilton. It includes rapidly growing residential communities alongside long-established rural and farming areas. Within minutes, residents can travel from busy commercial centres and subdivisions to rural backroads and farmland that support our local economy and food supply.

One of the most consistent concerns I hear from residents is affordability and accountability. People are paying high property taxes and deserve transparency with regards to where that money is going. I believe residents deserve a councillor who will advocate for reinvesting tax dollars directly back into the community through measurable improvements and responsible spending.

Community safety is another major issue. Residents deserve to feel safe in their neighbourhoods, and our first responders deserve strong support from City Hall. I want to ensure police, fire, and emergency services have the backing and resources they need while also advocating for practical solutions that improve safety throughout the ward.

Infrastructure is also a growing concern, especially in the rural areas of Ward 15. As someone who regularly drives the concessions north of Waterdown, I see firsthand the condition of many roads and the frustration residents experience daily. Basic infrastructure matters. We need better planning and investment to ensure roads, transportation routes, and essential services meet the needs of a growing community.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

Throughout my career, I have worked in roles that required gathering facts, reviewing evidence, and making difficult decisions under pressure. My experience in asset protection and investigations taught me the importance of staying objective, asking questions, and making decisions based on facts rather than assumptions.

I have also worked closely with people from many different backgrounds and life situations, which strengthened my communication skills and ability to listen respectfully to different perspectives. I believe effective leadership requires collaboration, accountability, and the willingness to hear concerns from both sides, in this case residents and fellow council members.

At the end of the day, my priority would always be the residents of Ward 15. Tough decisions are part of leadership, but residents deserve a councillor who will approach those decisions with fairness, accountability, transparency, and the community’s best interests in mind.

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

What distinguishes me from other candidates is my background in frontline investigations, accountability, and decision-making under pressure. I have worked in loss prevention and asset protection for major national and global corporations, both as a direct employee and as a subcontractor. In those roles, I investigated theft, fraud, and organized retail crime while balancing public safety with the rights of individuals involved.

My work required gathering evidence, preparing detailed reports, and making decisions that could withstand scrutiny from corporate leadership, law enforcement, and the judicial system. That experience taught me the importance of professionalism, accountability, attention to detail, and remaining calm in high stress situations.

I also bring a practical perspective to municipal politics. I understand the concerns of working families, small businesses, and residents who want safer communities, responsible spending, and leaders who focus on results rather than political talking points. My background has strengthened my communication skills, problem-solving abilities, and commitment to making informed, evidence-based decisions — qualities I believe are essential for effective leadership at City Hall.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

Residents can follow my journey and learn more about me as a husband, father, and Ward 15 resident through my social media pages:

Instagram: Zac Wrobel
Facebook: Zac Wrobel

Email: zacwrobelward15@gmail.com
Telephone: 289-460-1955

I look forward to connecting with residents, hearing their concerns, and discussing the future of Ward 15.

Thank-you Zac for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Traction In Action- With Ward 10 Councillor Candidate and Incumbent, Jeff Beattie

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:21:38 +0000

I think this image captures me in my natural form - in the community, supporting, serving, volunteering - and having fun along the way. The picture is inside the Peach Sundae Booth at the Winona Peach Festival, where I spend time every year serving Peach Sundaes to Festival-goers. I've been a member of the club that runs the booth for over 20 years, a Festival volunteer my entire life, and the person I'm sharing a laugh with is another long-time volunteer, former Scout Leader and former librarian of the now-closed Winona Branch of the Hamilton Public Library.

~Jeff

Before the Ballot- Candidate's Guide - Your Competitive Edge

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:23:43 +0000

The Hamiltonian releases its Before the Ballot- Candidate's Guide - Your Competitive Edge. This guide will be updated regularly.

Ready to sharpen your competitive edge? Download the guide by clicking here.

The Warning Signs Are Everywhere

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 23:15:42 +0000

"I can feel it coming in the air tonight, oh Lord."

Phil Collins was not writing about municipal politics when he penned those famous lyrics, but they capture something that is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore in Hamilton's 2026 municipal election.

Something is changing.

For decades, a familiar script has guided many municipal campaigns.

The conventional wisdom went something like this: Summer is quiet. Voters are distracted. Campaigns can wait. Incumbents can afford to take their time. Serious campaigning begins after Labour Day, when people return from vacations and begin paying attention.

The assumption was simple. Wait until September. Secure media coverage. Roll out the platform. Attend debates. Let the campaign begin.

But there are growing signs that this script may no longer be reliable. The first sign is early registration.

Across Hamilton, candidates are entering races earlier than many observers would typically expect. Early registration is more than an administrative act. It signals intent. It signals commitment. Most importantly, it signals hunger.

The second sign is participation. An overwhelming majority of candidates invited to participate in The Hamiltonian's Before the Ballot series have accepted. Candidates are not waiting for election season. They are stepping forward now to answer questions, explain their priorities, and place their ideas before voters.

The third sign is visibility. Consider the mayoral race. Mayoral candidate Keanin Loomis has been highly visible, attending community events, meeting residents, participating in discussions, and steadily building his presence across the city.

Meanwhile, mayoral candidate Scarlett Gillespie has demonstrated an ability to penetrate social media conversations, attract attention, and inspire discussions.

At the same time, mayoral candidate Sasha Austin has sought to reshape the conversation by publicly challenging both Loomis and fellow candidate Rob Cooper to debate, signaling that some candidates are not prepared to wait for the traditional campaign calendar before testing their ideas in public.

Nor are these the only examples. Across Hamilton's wards, candidates are engaging , introducing themselves to voters, and building support long before many would traditionally consider campaign season to have begun.

Some are doing so quietly. Others more visibly. But they are doing it. And perhaps that is the most important point. This is not about any one candidate. It is about a broader shift.

Perhaps the most telling sign of all is the public response. The level of interest being generated around local politics is unmistakable. The Hamiltonian's readership numbers are climbing. Social media discussions are expanding. Conversations sparked by the Before the Ballot candidate interviews are spreading well beyond the original articles.

What is particularly noteworthy is not simply the volume of engagement, but its quality. Yes, there are still occasional comments driven more by emotion than analysis. Every election has them.

But increasingly, Hamiltonians are asking thoughtful questions. They are comparing visions. They are challenging assumptions. They are examining records. They are debating ideas rather than personalities. And even through the glorious weather we have been enjoying , people are engaging.

With relatively low voter turnout, one also wonders what segment of the population can be relied on to cast their ballot. More than likely, it will be those who engage and care about what candidates say on The Hamiltonian.

Further, The Hamiltonian's Before the Ballot- The Candidates' Guide seeks to provide invaluable advice to anyone running.

There is an energy building. There is curiosity. There is scrutiny. There is accountability. And there is a growing realization that voters no longer need to wait for traditional campaign season to begin learning about those who seek to govern them.

The information is already available. The conversations have already started. The campaign, in many respects, is already underway. That should give pause to anyone relying on the old assumptions.

The candidate who believes nobody is paying attention until September may discover that voters have been paying attention all summer and have checked them out of the conversation.

The incumbent who assumes name recognition alone will carry the day may discover that voters are looking more closely than ever before while recognizing that incumbency carries with it an unfair advantage.

The campaign that waits for the traditional starting gun may find that the race has already left the starting line.

History has a habit of changing gradually and then suddenly. That is what we are witnessing now.

Perhaps Hamilton is entering a new era of municipal politics—one where engagement starts earlier, scrutiny runs deeper, and voters expect more from those seeking their trust. Perhaps The Before the Ballot series is more telling than anticipated.

If so, the old playbook may not merely be outdated.

It may be obsolete.

Traction in Action- with Mayoral Candidate Ejaz Butt

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 13:13:39 +0000

In this second edition. of Traction in Action, featuring pictures of candidates driving toward being elected, we feature mayoral candidate Ejaz Butt.

Before the Ballot- The Candidate's Guide - The Media Is Not Your Campaign Team

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:33:51 +0000

Municipal candidates often have a complicated relationship with the media. Some believe the media will ignore them. Others believe the media will help them. Some become frustrated when coverage does not appear. Others become overly dependent upon it.

The reality lies somewhere in between.

One of the most important lessons a candidate can learn is this: The media is not your campaign team.Nor should it be.

The primary responsibility of journalists and media organizations is to inform the public. Their job is not to elect candidates. Their job is not to defeat candidates. Their job is not to amplify campaign messaging simply because a campaign wishes it.

Candidates who understand this generally navigate media relationships more effectively than those who do not. Media outlets decide what is newsworthy through their own editorial lens.

Sometimes that will benefit a candidate. Sometimes it will not. Understanding this reality is essential.

The Changing Media Landscape

One of the most significant changes in modern municipal politics is that candidates are no longer dependent upon a handful of traditional media outlets to communicate with voters. That reality has fundamentally altered the political landscape.

Today, candidates can communicate through a wide variety of channels, including community publications, podcasts, online interview series, digital news platforms, blogs, social media, newsletters, and independent publishers. The result is that voters often have access to far more information about candidates than previous generations ever enjoyed.

The Rise of Direct-to-Voter Communication

In the past, candidates often depended upon a reporter's summary of their position. In The Hamiltonian, voters hear directly from candidates themselves. Candidate profiles and interviews allow voters to assess not only what candidates think, but how they think.

This shift has created new opportunities for candidates willing to engage thoughtfully and substantively. The strongest candidates are often those willing to answer questions in depth, explain their positions clearly, and make themselves accessible to public scrutiny.

Transparency itself has become a campaign asset.

Earned Media Versus Paid Media

Campaigns typically operate in two media environments. The first is paid media. This includes advertising that a campaign controls completely. The candidate decides the message. The candidate decides the

timing. The candidate decides the audience. This type of advertising can get pricey and the candidate has to ensure it does not overspend and violate campaign spending limits.

The second is earned media. This includes news stories, interviews, public debates, community coverage, and editorial attention. Earned media often carries greater credibility because it is not viewed as advertising.

However, it usually comes with one major limitation: The candidate does not control the final product. The word usually is used because in The Hamiltonian's Before the Ballot series, candidates' messaging is published verbatim and in full.

Why Some Candidates Receive More Attention- Candidates frequently ask why one campaign appears to receive more coverage than another. The answer is not always bias. Sometimes it is simply engagement.

Candidates who make themselves available, answer questions, participate in interviews, attend events, challenge ideas, propose solutions, and contribute to public discussion naturally become more visible.

Politics rewards participation. Media often reflects that reality. The candidates who are actively engaged in the public conversation are often the candidates who generate the most attention.

Be Accessible- One of the most underrated campaign skills is responsiveness. Reporters, interviewers, publishers, podcasters, and community media operators often work under significant time constraints.

Candidates who consistently return calls, answer questions, provide information, and meet deadlines tend to develop stronger professional relationships throughout the media ecosystem.

Accessibility does not guarantee favourable coverage. But inaccessibility almost guarantees missed opportunities.

Do Not Fear Questions- Many first-time candidates become nervous when confronted with difficult questions. That is understandable. However, difficult questions are not necessarily hostile questions. They are often the very questions voters are asking themselves. Strong candidates recognize that scrutiny is not an obstacle to democracy. It is part of democracy and it is an opportunity to demonstrate leadership.

The Most Powerful Media Asset

Candidates often spend enormous amounts of time trying to manage narratives. Yet the most powerful media asset remains surprisingly simple: Credibility. A candidate who consistently answers questions, engages respectfully, provides clear positions, and remains accessible develops credibility over time.

That credibility becomes increasingly valuable as election day approaches. In a crowded field of candidates, trust often becomes the deciding factor.

Final Thoughts

Media coverage matters. The strongest candidates understand that modern politics is no longer about securing a single headline. It is about participating in an ongoing public conversation.

Today's voters have access to more information, more platforms, more interviews, and more perspectives than ever before. For candidates, that creates both a challenge and an opportunity.

The challenge is that there are fewer places to hide. The opportunity is that there are more ways than ever to be heard. Candidates who embrace openness, accessibility, and public engagement are often the ones who benefit most from today's evolving media landscape.

Because in the end, voters are not merely looking for messages. They are looking for people willing to engage in the conversation.

Traction in Action, with Ward 15 Councillor Candidate Colleen Stewart

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 20:09:21 +0000

Hamiltonians often see candidates on signs, websites, and campaign literature. We'd like to show voters something a little different.

We invited all candidates running for Mayor or Council to submit one photograph of themselves "in action" — doing something that reflects who they are, what they care about, or how they engage with the community. Along with the photo, we asked them to include a brief one- or two-line caption

We are calling this series Traction in Action, because these are candidates who are driven and who are out there earning your vote, gaining traction in their respective races.

This first edition features Ward 15 Councillor Candidate Colleen Stewart. Here is Colleen (on the left) in action:

Cleaning a garden on Dundas Street during Waterdown's Community Cleanup. Beautiful communities inspire good citizenship in the people who live in them. I was delighted to help.

Before the Ballot- with Ward 3 Councillor Candidate Christine Cayuga

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:04:39 +0000

Welcome to this edition of Before the Ballot- with Ward 3 Councillor Candidate Christine Cayuga.

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

My motivation for running comes from the people I've met through owning a local diner and sitting as a Borad of Director on a non for profit . Every day, I hear residents community members ' concerns, ideas, and frustrations. Those conversations have shown me that people want leadership that listens, acts with integrity, and puts residents first. I believe Ward 3 deserves a strong voice at City Hall, and I'm ready to deliver that leadership.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

Ward 3 faces many challenges, but the three issues I hear about most often are affordability, neighbourhood safety and well-being, and trust in local government financial decisions.

1.Affordability is one of the biggest concerns I hear from residents. Families, seniors, and individuals are dealing with rising property taxes, utility costs, housing expenses, and the increasing cost of everyday living.

As a councillor, I would carefully review budgets and supporting documents , ask questions about spending, and ensure every dollar is being used responsibly. Residents work hard for their money and deserve to know their tax dollars are being spent wisely and effectively.

2. Neighborhood & safety Ward 3 residents want clean streets, well-maintained public spaces, and solutions that address issues such as property crime, illegal dumping, neglected infrastructure, traffic safety, and concerns related to homelessness and mental health.

I would work with residents, City staff, Hamilton Police, community organizations, and local businesses to identify priorities and develop practical solutions. This includes improving lighting in public spaces, advocating for traffic-calming measures where needed, supporting community safety initiatives, maintaining parks and public spaces, and ensuring support services are available for all residents.

3. Trust in local government and financial decision-making is another issue I hear about regularly from residents. People want confidence that decisions are being carefully reviewed—not simply rubber-stamped.

Residents want to know that when Council is considering a project, budget item, or major development, the right questions are being asked: What is the purpose? Why is it needed? When will it be completed? What are the expected costs? Are there potential cost overruns, delays, or long-term financial impacts?

As a councillor, I believe it is my responsibility to do the homework, review reports thoroughly, ask questions, and ensure decisions are made with transparency and accountability. Residents deserve clear explanations about how their tax dollars are being spent and what results they can expect. Good governance means being prepared, informed, and willing to ask questions before decisions are made—not after. Building trust starts with openness, accountability, and ensuring residents have confidence that their interests are being represented at City Hall.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

I would approach tough decisions by listening first, gathering the facts, and asking questions. I want to understand the costs, benefits, risks, and long-term impacts before making a decision. While not everyone will agree with every outcome, residents deserve transparency about how decisions are made. My goal is to be accountable, make informed choices, respect taxpayer dollars, and ensure decisions benefit residents both today and for future generations."

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

I bring to table the perspective of a small business owner who understands budgets, accountability, and the importance of serving people. Through my diner, I've had countless conversations with residents and have heard firsthand the challenges they're facing. I am approachable, independent, and willing to ask tough questions. I believe residents want a councillor who listens, does the homework, and makes thoughtful decisions with integrity, and that's the leadership I hope to bring to Ward 3.

In addition, my experience serving on a Board of Directors has given me a strong understanding of governance, oversight, policy development, strategic planning, and fiduciary responsibility. I've learned the importance of reviewing information carefully, asking questions, considering different perspectives, and making decisions that are in the best interests of the organization and the people it serves.

I have a strong sense of community. Through my business, volunteer work, and community involvement, I have had the opportunity to connect with residents from all walks of life. I understand the challenges people are facing because I've listened to their concerns and heard their stories firsthand.

Together, these experiences have prepared me to be a thoughtful, accountable, and effective representative for Ward 3—someone who listens, leads with integrity, and works collaboratively to find practical solutions for our community.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

Cayugaward3@Gmail.com
Cell:365-335-4196
www.christinecayuga@ward3.com

Thank-you Christine for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Before the Ballot- with Ward 12 Councillor Candidate Fred Bennick

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 07 Jun 2026 16:35:05 +0000

Welcome to this edition of Before the Ballot- with Ward 12 Councillor Candidate Fred Bennick

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

I’m running in ward 12, that is Ancaster, Rural Ancaster, and West Flamborough, out of a desire to make a positive impact on our city and our community. I want to see, not just our part of the city thrive, but the whole city of Hamilton. I choose to run at this time because I also have some serious concerns about the direction and condition of things at City Hall. Increased property taxes (23% in this last term alone) crumbling infrastructure, poor financial management, and lack of accountability are just too prevalent. New and more competent leadership is urgently needed to address these issues. I believe I have the skills and time necessary to do this work. It will not be easy. In fact, I know it will be hard. However, hard work has never been something that I have shied away from.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

My campaign has 4 pillars.

A. Infrastructure that works. Ie roads, and associated procurement.
B. Lower Property Tax
C. Community Safety.
D. End the upcoming Rain Tax

Each of these pillars requires further explanation, which I’d be pleased to discuss with any Ward 12 Resident. I can assure residents that calls and emails will be returned promptly.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

I believe Council needs a much stronger review of spending growth, administrative expansion, and project prioritization. We also need to distinguish between essential infrastructure and discretionary spending. Growing our commercial and industrial base needs to accelerate which will lessen the tax burden on homeowners.

People feel they are paying more and getting less. We need fiscal responsibility, stronger infrastructure planning, and leadership that will focus on the basics that residents care about every day.

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

I would encourage anyone interested in knowing about me to visit my campaign website. (Bennink.ca) you can see my background including building a business starting at age 23, serving on many Boards, giving back to my community, etc.

Residents feel they are paying more and getting less. Taxes go up, roads get worse, they can’t get anyone to answer their calls or emails. We have some councillors with a very narrow ideology, and I believe that needs to change. Will it be easy? No, not at all. It’ll be hard work. I learned the importance of working hard and doing all things to the best of my ability from my parents and extended family. Like many people in Ward 12 and in the city of Hamilton, I am from an immigrant family. My wife and I are children of Dutch immigrants. We learned the value of hard work, honesty, and commitment to family, faith, and community. It is these things which also give me hope for the future. Our city can and will thrive when we work together for the good of all.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

FredBenninkward12@gmail.com

Cell/text 905.570.5665

Thank-you Fred for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Before the Ballot- In the Mix - Ward 3

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 07 Jun 2026 02:29:05 +0000

What the Early Ward 3 Interviews May Mean for the Race

The Ward 3 race is beginning to reveal something increasingly important: the candidates are not talking about the same problems.

While all four candidates express dissatisfaction with the status quo, they approach the ward from very different perspectives. That may ultimately determine who gains traction with voters.

At first glance, there appears to be a common thread running through the campaign. Affordability, taxes, neighbourhood conditions, public safety, and accountability all emerge as recurring themes. However, beneath those broad concerns are distinctly different visions for what Ward 3 needs.

Andrew Selman has positioned himself as the accountability and taxpayer-focused candidate. His interview repeatedly returns to issues of spending, taxation, project oversight, transparency, and measurable outcomes. He frames many of Ward 3's challenges through the lens of City Hall performance and financial management. His message appears designed to resonate with residents who believe they are paying more while receiving less in return. His emphasis on audits, process improvement, derelict properties, and economic development suggests a campaign built around fiscal oversight and municipal efficiency.

Christopher Demelo occupies a somewhat different space. While he also speaks about taxes and service delivery, his approach is more governance-oriented than purely fiscal. Drawing on his union leadership experience, Demelo presents himself as someone accustomed to balancing competing interests and solving practical problems. His focus on roads, housing standards, homelessness, and long-term planning may appeal to voters looking for a candidate who combines social concerns with operational management.

Graham Schreiber's interview stands apart in both tone and content. His campaign appears centered on public safety, crime, narcotics activity, property standards, and frustration with government spending. His language is direct, sometimes blunt, and likely intended to resonate with residents who feel that political correctness and bureaucracy have prevented honest conversations about neighbourhood decline. The challenge for Schreiber may be whether that directness attracts a broad enough coalition of voters beyond those already sharing his frustrations.

Kristeen Sprague presents perhaps the most community-oriented and grassroots approach of the four candidates. Her interview focuses on listening, accessibility, local concerns, and responsiveness. Rather than emphasizing large structural reforms, she highlights practical neighbourhood issues such as garbage collection, beautification, environmental cleanup, parks, and community engagement. Her background on advisory committees and community boards may help her appeal to voters who prioritize representation and local involvement over ideological debates.

Taken together, these interviews suggest that Ward 3 may not be a traditional left-versus-right contest. Instead, it may become a competition among four different theories of leadership.

One theory argues that Ward 3's problems stem primarily from spending, taxation, and weak accountability.

Another argues that better management and practical governance can improve services and quality of life.

A third argues that public safety, enforcement, and neighbourhood standards require far greater attention.

A fourth argues that residents simply need a stronger voice and more responsive representation.

At this stage, Selman appears to have assembled the most comprehensive policy platform among the candidates interviewed so far, while Demelo presents himself as a pragmatic problem-solver. Schreiber is offering a sharper anti-establishment message, and Sprague is emphasizing community connection and local responsiveness.

The critical question for Ward 3 voters may become which issue rises to the top of the public agenda over the coming months. If affordability and taxes dominate the conversation, candidates emphasizing fiscal accountability could benefit. If concerns around homelessness, public disorder, and neighbourhood safety intensify, voters may gravitate toward candidates with stronger enforcement-oriented messages. If residents become focused on responsiveness, accessibility, and community engagement, candidates emphasizing grassroots representation may gain momentum.

What is clear from these early interviews is that Ward 3 is unlikely to be a one-issue race. The candidates are presenting voters with distinctly different paths forward. As more residents begin paying attention to the election, the candidate who best connects Ward-wide frustrations with a credible plan for change may ultimately emerge as the one to watch.

The race remains early, but Ward 3 is already showing signs of becoming one of Hamilton's more interesting electoral contests.

Of Note: Incumbent Ward 3 Councillor Nrinder Nann has yet to register and we have yet to hear from candidate Christine Cayuga. In an election year where early activity is becoming a hallmark, it will be interesting to see if there is any correlation between early activity and momentum.

Before the Ballot- with Ward 3 Councillor Candidate Andrew Selman

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 07 Jun 2026 01:11:42 +0000

Welcome to Before the Ballot- with Ward 3 Councillor Candidate Andrew Selman.

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

I'm a lifelong Hamiltonian, and I live right here in Ward 3 with my wife and our daughter. Hamilton, and specifically Ward 3, has incredible potential. This vibrant neighbourhood, full of diverse and hardworking people, is a massive motivating factor for me. I've heard from so many residents across our community who simply do not feel heard by our current Councillor. They don't get calls back, and they don't get answers on the issues that matter most to their daily lives. Our family has felt the exact same way.

Recently, we have all seen the municipal drift. We feel the lack of transparency from City Hall, and we see the lack of progress on our streets. But we absolutely have the power to change course.

I never intended to be a politician, and quite frankly, I do not intend to become a career politician. I have made my living as a data and compliance analyst. My career has been built on examining the numbers, identifying inefficiencies, and holding large organizations to a higher standard so they can improve. When I look at the finances coming out of City Hall, they simply do not add up for the families living here in Ward 3. I know I have the professional tools to help fix that.

We need a Ward 3 Councillor who will stand up and demand the respect taxpayers deserve. When we talk to our neighbours, we hear the exact same frustration from so many. We are all working harder, we are paying way more in property taxes, we are watching our current Councillor support new property taxes added to our bills, and we are getting less and less back from our city. Under our current representation, taxes have jumped more than 30 percent over her two terms. We have been crushed by back-to-back hikes totaling over 22 percent in just the last four years alone.

Now is the right time for new leadership, because we can no longer afford to fund City Hall's mistakes while our elected official passively stands by. We are paying for a micro shelter project at Barton and Tiffany that ballooned 300 percent over budget. We are paying millions in extra interest because the city has failed to file basic financial reports, which cost us our AAA credit rating. We are also paying for nearly 1,000 new city staff hired in just four years, yet our daily municipal services have gotten worse.

We do not need more political rhetoric. We need a representative who will demand measurable results, put a stop to the runaway spending, and go to work for you every single day. We need a fresh approach to how this city operates.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

Affordability, Tax Hikes, and Wasteful Spending

Ward 3 families have been crushed by property tax hikes totaling more than 20 percent over the last four years. We have to stop draining our emergency reserve funds just to hide the cost of everyday city operations. While you are being asked to pay more, City Hall payroll costs have skyrocketed, yet the services you rely on have not improved. Instead of actually fixing the terrible state of our local roads, we get temporary patches and quick political photo ops. Through all this, the current Ward 3 councillor has failed to stop the drift and get us back on track.

We need real oversight to fix this. We need to improve the processes that dictate how business gets done in this city. I will push for tough, independent audits to cut wasteful upper management and high-priced consultants. I will demand strict project oversight to stop scope creep and eliminate government waste. At the same time, I will fiercely protect the vital frontline workers who actually deliver for our community.

Safe and Clean Neighbourhoods

Derelict and burned-out buildings are magnets for crime. In Ward 3, a few bad-apple property owners sitting on these long-abandoned buildings are actively holding our communities back. I will launch a 90-day action plan to force the cleanup or demolition of dangerous, fire-gutted shells along the Barton, Main, and King corridors.

When we crack down on these properties, we force negligent owners to either fix them up or sell them. This grows our city tax base and lowers the burden on everyday residents without raising your tax rates. That means we can finally start investing in our neighbourhoods again. We can fund the infrastructure we desperately need so our kids have safe, vibrant parks they can actually enjoy, and we can finally repair our crumbling streets the right way.

We need to enact cleaning protocols on our cherished Ward 3 alleys, ensure our kids have safe walks to school by investing in crossing infrastructure, and foster a welcoming environment where every resident, regardless of who you are, feels proud to call our community home

Modernizing Hamilton and Growing Our Local Economy

While neighbouring cities modernize how they do business by streamlining approvals and fostering growth, our outdated processes are holding Ward 3 and Hamilton back. It’s time to bring Hamilton into the 21st century so that it finally works for you. We need to cut the red tape at City Hall. By shaving months off the permit process, we help local entrepreneurs get to work faster to revitalize commercial hubs like Barton Street. We also need to protect our existing community builders. I will fight hard for grants to keep our local shops open during the LRT construction.

Fixing up our commercial main streets is the smartest way to grow our tax base without squeezing families. By adopting modern, proactive policies, we can unlock local growth and bring long-term investment and more good jobs back to Ward 3. We need stable, predictable taxes to make that happen and ensure our community thrives.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

My professional background revolves around solving complex problems and finding efficiencies. I know how to cut through the bureaucratic noise to find the truth. I believe we can achieve those exact same results at City Hall, but it requires a fundamental shift in how we govern.

I approach difficult decisions by looking at the hard data, but numbers alone don't tell the whole story. I listen to the real stakeholders. That means you, my neighbours. We have to balance the ledger while remembering that every single tax dollar we spend comes from a taxpayer working hard to make ends meet. I will approach every decision with fierce transparency and an objective mindset. My votes will be based on verifiable facts, strict adherence to what is best for our neighbourhoods, and a firm commitment to protecting our frontline workers while cutting the waste.

We do not have to accept the status quo of runaway spending and broken promises. If we ground our choices in the truth and bring everyday voices back to the council table, we can build a Hamilton that is affordable, accountable, and vibrant.

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

Over the last few years, I have had great opportunities to work with so many of my neighbours on the real issues facing our Ward 3 community. Together, we have proven just how effective we can be while working outside City Hall.

In my private sector career, I work as a data and compliance analyst. This entails auditing large corporations to ensure they are following policies, regulations, and laws, as well as working with large datasets to identify problems and build solutions. Much of my career has been spent defining, deploying, and measuring processes to help large organizations succeed and measurably improve. I believe these skills can help City Hall get back on track.

In our community, I took on the fight against negligent property owners. I successfully pushed to get the three abandoned buildings backing onto Memorial School on Ottawa Street demolished, holding the city accountable for a decade of inaction right beside where our kids learn. I have consistently put in the work around the neighbourhood on volunteer cleanups and community fundraising events. I pride myself on being a neighbour who shows up when you really need a hand.

I sit on the Hamilton Police Service Division 20 Superintendent's committee, working as a liaison between my neighbours across several wards and the Hamilton Police. I am a strong believer in collaboration, finding common ground, and working together. I have delegated at City Hall more times than I can count, always focusing on progress, taxpayer respect, and demanding true transparency from our elected officials so our city can thrive.

We have already done the heavy lifting from the outside. If we take that same grassroots energy, pair it with real professional rigor, and bring it directly to the council table, there is no limit to what we can accomplish. Together, we can build the vibrant, accountable, and forward-thinking Ward 3 that our families deserve.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

I have had the pleasure of having so many good conversations about the issues with new friends and neighbours while out walking here in Ward 3. I always encourage a friendly discussion, so say hello if we happen to run into each other.

To learn more, you can visit my campaign website at voteandrewselman.com (coming soon). You can also email me directly at AndrewSelmanWard3@gmail.com, or follow me on Instagram at @andrewselman.

If you would like to support a fresh approach in Ward 3, you can donate to my campaign here. Any amount helps and is greatly appreciated.

Otherwise, I hope to catch you at the door when I am out knocking and talking with my Ward 3 neighbours about the issues that matter to our community.

Thank-you Andrew for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Video of the Moment

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sat, 06 Jun 2026 16:37:11 +0000

A case study on Data Centres - U.S. based but illuminating. Click here to go there.

Before the Ballot- Questions for Hamilton's Next Mayor- Hamilton as a Sanctuary City- With Mayoral Candidate Sasha Austin

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sat, 06 Jun 2026 02:40:25 +0000

The following is our Before the Ballot: Questions for Hamilton’s Next Mayor question for the month of June. Enjoy our Q/A with Mayoral Candidate Sasha Austin:

Over time, Hamilton has increasingly been described and treated as a ‘sanctuary city,’ largely through council policies and administrative approaches that received relatively limited public attention or broad civic debate at the time they were implemented.

Supporters argue such policies reflect compassion, inclusion, and public health considerations. Critics, however, question the impact on municipal resources, housing pressures, taxpayer burden, and public confidence in immigration and enforcement systems.

As Mayor, would you support Hamilton continuing to operate as a sanctuary city in principle and practice? Why or why not? And how would you balance humanitarian considerations with growing concerns surrounding housing affordability, infrastructure strain, social services capacity, and property tax pressures facing Hamilton residents today? Do you believe Hamiltonians can afford to remain a sanctuary city?

Before Hamilton voted to become Canada’s second sanctuary city in February 2014 the Hamilton Sanctuary City Collation submitted a report to the city. This report examined the factors to be taken into consideration when exploring the idea of creating sanctuary city policies including access to healthcare and police services remain the primary concern for undocumented migrants. Fear of detection, detention and deportation is a major obstacle preventing many from obtaining services to which they would otherwise have access. Precarious migratory status disproportionately affects women who are vulnerable because they often come to Canada using temporary visas and family sponsorships. Women with precarious status are often vulnerable to exploitation and violence in personal relationships. Children are the most severely impacted by precarious status, this status restricts their access to food bank programs, recreational programs and daycare activities that are necessary for a healthy development.

As of April 2014, two Canadian cities adopted sanctuary city policies. Toronto became Canadas first sanctuary city in February 2013 followed by Hamilton in February 2014. Sanctuary city policies in Hamilton municipally funded services can include access to parks and recreation, community centres, police, fire, and emergency services, public transportation services, public libraries, food banks and emergency shelters.

Once Hamilton was declared a sanctuary city this meant non status immigrants would be able to access public services without fear of being reported. A sanctuary city is a place where immigrants can access city services regardless of their citizenship status. Select the concept would mean a don't ask, don't tell policy where immigrants can go to the public health or other taxpayer funded agencies without fear being turned in to the authorities.

The mayor of Hamilton when the City Council voted to adopt A sanctuary city policy in 2014 was Bob Bratina on February 12, 2014. City Council officially voted to become Canada’s second sanctuary city ensuring that undocumented individuals could access municipal and municipal funded services without fear of their immigration status being questioned. The primary driver of this motion at the council level was counselor Sam Merulla alongside community advocacy from the groups like the Hamilton Community Legal Clinic with Hugh Tye – Executive Director initiating the sanctuary city as well as Paul Johnson then director of neighborhood development strategies.

I have worked in shelters and drop-in centres straight from my college grad in 2002, I seen firsthand the enormous difference between need, intakes and call ins for families seeking shelter space and support. for the first 12 years was reasonable access and inquiries almost always with beds available. Fast track to 2015 and on I started having to literally turn two or three families away a day due to the overwhelming shortage in beds even with overflow. In the early years of my career, I was able to seamlessly obtain housing and necessities for clients then to have to turn them away in the later years is heartbreaking and inhumane. It does no good either to the families that cannot access resources due to overcapacity.

The sanctuary city plan is not revenue neutral for taxpayers. The sanctuary city policy has affected taxpayers with broad financial strains including shelter and housing costs. Hamilton has recently spent millions annually in emergency shelter overflow and hotel placements to handle demands. Because these pressures hit the municipal level, as mayor I would actively push the federal and provincial governments for millions in financial reimbursements to cover refugee and asylum claimant support.

As mayor I would advocate to grandfather in migrant Hamilton Families who have choose our city to find refuge and raise their children. Our newcomers that have made Hamilton home and proudly contribute, study, work and grow are an extension of how our city reflects a welcoming melting pot. Our diverse migrants are very valuable, bring different perspectives and are insightful. Hamiltonians alike are made up inclusive backgrounds, cultures and status. With that said as mayor I would fiercely lobby to grandfather our ready-made migrant families into Hamilton who will receive permanent access to sanctuary city policies. I will work routinely through municipal organisations like the Federation of Canadian Municipalities or the Association of Municipalities of Ontario to push the federal government to alter immigration policy's and communicate with federal members of parliament and cabinet ministers such as the ministry of immigration refugees and citizenship to propose legalizing the status of undocumented residents already living in the city of Hamilton calling it home for many years. These communications will be done in compliance with federal guidelines such as those outlined in the lobbying act. As mayor I will use my public platform, media and grassroots collations to build political pressure on the federal government to grant a blanket amnesty and stop of removal on deportations for specific demographics or all current non status migrants living in Hamilton. Employee training will be mandated, education for municipal employees to recognize and accommodate the rights of newcomers already living in Hamilton.

With all that said I do feel that Hamilton jumped the gun and joined the band wagon when pushing to become a sanctuary city shortly after Toronto made the decision to do so. It is alarming that Hamilton Leadership at the time did not take into consideration the public input and went ahead without real assessment as to how a sanctuary city would exhaust our resources in the long run and in turn harming Hamiltonians that are already struggling to say the least. By becoming a sanctuary city so shortly after the city of Toronto did appears as a ‘follow the leader” move that does not align with our Hammers strong, bright, community structures that seek long term stability. With the right, strong, leadership in touch with reality that practiced common sense, the sanctuary city would not have been passed, effectively reducing the hardship on our housing, food banks, infrastructure etc. Once the sanctuary city was announced many flocked to her city in record numbers pushing may Hamiltonians on the streets due strain on our resources. With all that said, I would put forward to council to end sanctuary city policies until our city has fully recovered and is able to accommodate.

In conclusion In the City of Hamilton as mayor, I could not unilaterally remove the cities sanctuary status. As reversing established municipal policies requires a formal vote by the full City Council. The key factors that dictate how this policy can be changed include council authority. The Hamiltons access to services for undocumented individuals was established in February 2014 via a unanimous vote by the City Council modifying or reversing this municipal designation similarly requires a successful majority vote out of formal council meeting.

In Unity,
Sasha Austin
Hamilton Mayoral Candidate

Thank-you Sasha for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Before the Ballot: The Candidates Guide- Signs Don't Win Elections — But They Matter

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 19:59:18 +0000

This article is part of The Hamiltonian's ongoing "Before the Ballot: The Candidate's Guide" series examining the realities, strategies, and challenges of municipal election campaigns.

One of the first visible signs of a campaign is, quite literally, the sign.

Suddenly lawns, fences, businesses, and intersections begin displaying candidate names and slogans. Candidates often spend thousands of dollars on signs. Volunteers spend countless hours installing them. Supporters proudly place them on their properties.

But an important question remains: Do signs actually win elections? The answer is both yes and no. Signs Are About Visibility

The primary purpose of a campaign sign is simple: Name recognition.

Most municipal voters do not follow local politics closely. Many only begin paying attention in the final weeks before voting day. When residents repeatedly see a candidate's name throughout the community, that name becomes familiar. Familiarity matters.

When voters enter the polling station and face a list of names, they are more likely to recognize candidates they have seen before. Signs help create that recognition. One of the biggest mistakes campaigns make is confusing visibility with support. A candidate may have hundreds of signs and still lose.

Another candidate may have far fewer signs and win comfortably. Why? Because signs indicate awareness, not commitment.

A sign cannot tell you whether:

• The resident will vote
• Their family supports the candidate
• They will encourage others to vote
• They will actually cast a ballot

Many experienced campaign managers repeat the same phrase: "Signs don't vote. People do."

Signs perform another important function. They create momentum. Voters often look for cues about whether a candidate is viable. When residents see signs throughout a neighbourhood, they may conclude: "That candidate seems to have support.” This can influence perceptions of legitimacy and competitiveness.

People generally prefer backing candidates they believe have a realistic chance of winning. In this way, signs can become self-reinforcing.

Many supporters hesitate when it comes to signs. They may like a candidate but worry about upsetting neighbours, friends, employers, customers, or political opponents. Once signs begin appearing throughout a neighbourhood, others often become more comfortable displaying their own.

Momentum creates momentum. Location Matters More Than Quantity. Not all signs are equally valuable. A sign on a heavily travelled roadway may be seen by thousands of residents every day. A sign on a quiet side street may receive very little exposure.

Strategic placement often matters more than raw numbers. Candidates should think about:

• Major commuter routes
• Community gathering areas
• High-traffic intersections
• Key neighbourhood gateways

A well-positioned sign can generate more visibility than several poorly located ones.

Every election features what some call "sign wars.” Campaigns become obsessed with counting signs. Candidates drive through neighbourhoods comparing their totals with opponents.

Supporters report where competitors have installed new signs. Entire campaign strategies begin revolving around sign numbers. This is usually a mistake.

Time spent counting an opponent's signs is time not spent speaking with voters. Strong campaigns monitor visibility but remain focused on voter contact.

Signs support campaigns. They do not replace campaigns. Signs Can Reveal Organizational Strength

While signs do not directly predict victory, they can reveal something important: Organization. A campaign with volunteers capable of securing locations, installing signs, maintaining them, and replacing damaged signs often possesses a broader support network.

The sign itself may not matter. The organization behind it does. That's what experienced observers are often measuring.

The Rise of Digital Signs Today's campaigns face a different reality than candidates twenty years ago. Many voters encounter candidates online long before they see a lawn sign. Social media, digital advertising, videos, websites, and online interviews now compete with traditional campaign materials.

The strongest campaigns integrate both approaches. Physical signs reinforce digital visibility. Digital visibility reinforces physical signs. Together they create familiarity.

Final Thoughts

Campaign signs remain an important part of municipal politics.They help build awareness. They demonstrate activity. They contribute to momentum. But candidates should never mistake signs for support.

The campaigns that win elections are rarely the ones with the most signs. They are usually the ones with the most conversations. Because while signs may introduce a candidate's name, it is relationships that ultimately earn votes.

This piece will be reposted closer to sign time.

Comments

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 16:46:23 +0000

As the election season progresses, experience has shown that public comments and opinions can sometimes become increasingly heated.

The Hamiltonian welcomes respectful discussion and differing viewpoints. However, we will not publish comments that contain personal attacks, insults, or language directed at individuals rather than the issues being discussed.

If you disagree with a position or viewpoint, we encourage you to express your perspective thoughtfully and respectfully. Constructive debate strengthens public discourse and helps foster meaningful community dialogue.

If you have suggestions for The Hamiltonian itself, please direct those to admin AT thehamiltonian DOT info.

Ward 4 Councillor Candidate and Incumbant Tammy Hwang Responds to Farr's Criticisms

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:17:49 +0000

In his recent Before the Ballot interview with The Hamiltonian, Ward 4 candidate Jason Farr offered a number of pointed criticisms regarding incumbent Councillor Tammy Hwang's record and approach to governance. (see that piece here).

Consistent with The Hamiltonian's commitment to fairness, balance, and providing readers with the opportunity to hear directly from those involved, we contacted Councillor Hwang and invited her to respond to the comments and observations raised during Mr. Farr's interview.

Councillor Hwang accepted that invitation. We received the following response from Ms. Hwang:

Bringing real results, evidence and collaboration – all for a stronger Ward 4

As recent commentary pointed out, the choice facing Ward 4 residents this October isn’t about identifying our challenges. The real choice is about how we solve them.

We can look backward and rely on the combative political rhetoric of the past.

Or we can look forward – do the hard, evidence-based work required to build a modern, resilient Hamilton.

I’m here for the latter, because Ward 4 residents deserve a councillor who listens, advocates, solves problems and, frankly, works hard for the community.

My approach to governance has always been rooted in data, strategic investment and deep collaboration. True leadership isn't about looking backward to point fingers, nor is it a solo effort.

It’s a team effort with my councillor colleagues, Ward 4 office and City staff – one that requires making connections, pulling strategic levers and calling for responsibility and investments from higher levels of government.

I want to bring evidence and facts to clarify recent claims:

● Credit rating: Hamilton recently received ‘AA+’ credit rating from S&P Global Ratings; it’s the second highest possible on S&P’s global scale. Hamilton obtained and maintained its credit rating of ‘AAA’ since 2022 – the year I started on council. The report also highlighted Hamilton’s strong cash reserve, with enough liquidity to cover its annual debt payments nine times over.

● Engagement: Our Ward 4 office hosted 300+ meetings with residents and local businesses per year to directly listen to their concerns. Outside of that, I regularly attend community events hosted by local and regional organizations, neighbourhood associations and connect with anchor businesses (e.g. Dofasco) in the community by keeping them accountable through participation on their community liaison committees. Showing up for community matters, and that’s what I enjoy the most.

● Community benefits: Partnership and influence is another way I’ve brought greater transparency to Ward 4 residents. My office encouraged New Horizon Development Group to host an open house at their 1284 Main St. E. site (the old Delta secondary school, my high school). We helped engage residents and received 200+ comments on that development application and changes to the original plan. I also backed my councillor colleagues to develop a community benefit protocol for developments and big city projects and spearheaded actions to support small businesses affected by LRT construction.

● Budget process: The Strong Mayor Act introduced in 2022 by the province means that the mayor is granted exclusive authority over the budget proposal – a significant change from prior years. Throughout this shift and change, I met with city staff to work together and find efficiencies without reducing service levels while finding alternate revenues and opportunities to reduce the tax levy burden on property taxes. One example: reallocating dollars from the Municipal Accommodation Tax Revenues to reduce the overall tax levy by $2 million.

● Cycling infrastructure: Hamilton’s cycling master plan was introduced in 2007, estimated to be completed by 2031. However, the plan is far from complete with costs that continue to increase. Hamilton received matching funding from the Federal Active Transportation Fund to support the project, which enabled the new bike boulevards in Ward 4 along Central Ave, Graham Ave, and soon Cochrane Rd. It's how we were able to improve the mountain Brow and connect east to west with a multi-use trail along the escarpment.Since 2023, Hamilton has been spending approximately $6 million on new cycling infrastructure. Council and staff further advocated for matching funds from the province and federal governments. With commitments from all levels of government, we’ve made each dollar of infrastructure stretch further.

Healthy debate is par for course in politics. With me, you get accurate information, transparent discussions and evidence-based decisions.

The Ward 4 community deserves a councillor who views governance not as a political tit-for-tat, but as a shared commitment to city-building.

I look forward to continuing this positive, constructive and fact-based conversation with neighbours across Ward 4 on the campaign trail.

Thank-you Tammy for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Before the Ballot- In the Ward 4 Mix- Your Political Intelligence Briefing

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 02:16:19 +0000

The Hamiltonian. does not have a crystal ball, but often times, a race can be read by studying its dynamics and candidates. Let's venture into the Ward 4 race as a three way contest takes shape.

When incumbent Councillor Tammy Hwang first appeared headed toward re-election, the race seemed likely to revolve around her first-term record and whether voters felt she deserved another four years. The entry of former Ward 2 Councillor Jason Farr dramatically changed that equation, transforming the contest into a battle between two established political figures with very different views of municipal government.

Now, with businessman and longtime Ward 4 resident Todd Anderson officially entering the race, a third dynamic has emerged. Ward 4 voters are no longer being presented with a simple choice between continuity and change. They are now being offered three distinct styles of leadership.

Three Different Narratives

The most striking aspect of the three Before the Ballot interviews is that all three candidates identify many of the same concerns: affordability, infrastructure, public safety, and neighbourhood improvement. The differences emerge in how they interpret those concerns and what they believe should be done about them.

Tammy Hwang's campaign is rooted in continuity and long-term investment. Her interview focuses on major city-building initiatives such as the LRT, environmental monitoring, infrastructure renewal, economic revitalization of Kenilworth Avenue, and collaborative approaches to housing and public safety. Her message is that Hamilton faces complex challenges requiring patience, partnerships, and sustained investment.

Jason Farr's campaign is built around affordability and accountability. His interview repeatedly argues that taxes have risen too quickly, spending has become excessive, and residents are not seeing sufficient value for their money. Farr presents himself as the experienced former councillor who can restore fiscal discipline while improving engagement with residents.

Todd Anderson's message lands somewhere different. Rather than positioning himself as a defender of council's direction or as a direct critic of City Hall's fiscal management, Anderson emphasizes community roots, practical business experience, and local representation. His interview speaks frequently about growing up in Ward 4, raising a family there, operating a successful business, and wanting to give back to the community that helped shape him. In many ways, Anderson's campaign is less ideological and more personal.

The Question of Vote Splitting- The obvious question political observers will ask is whether Anderson's entry helps Tammy Hwang or Jason Farr, or whether he can find his own path forward.

At first glance, some might assume Anderson and Farr appeal to similar voters because both emphasize affordability, practical governance, and neighbourhood concerns. However, the reality may be more nuanced.

Farr enters the race with a significant political profile. He served three terms on council and is well known throughout Hamilton. His supporters are likely to include voters specifically seeking a return to his style of municipal leadership.

Anderson may attract a different segment of the electorate: residents who want change but are not necessarily looking for a return to previous council leadership. His business background and local roots may resonate with voters who are frustrated with politics generally and are seeking a fresh face rather than a political veteran. That creates a potentially interesting dynamic.

If Anderson draws primarily from voters seeking change, he could fragment the anti-incumbent vote. If he succeeds in attracting voters who might otherwise have remained disengaged, he could expand the overall electorate and create an entirely different outcome.this stage, it is simply too early to know.

The Experience Question- One of the clearest contrasts in the race involves experience. Hwang argues that she has spent four years learning the complexities of city government and building relationships needed to deliver results. Farr points to twelve years of council experience and argues that he already knows how to navigate City Hall effectively. Anderson offers a different kind of experience altogether: three decades of operating a business, managing employees, solving problems, and balancing budgets in the private sector. Voters will ultimately decide which type of experience they value most.

The Geography Factor- Another intriguing aspect of the race is geography and local identity. Anderson repeatedly emphasizes that he lives in Ward 4 and has spent much of his life there. Farr emphasizes his deep personal history in Ward 4 despite currently residing just outside the ward boundary. Hwang points to four years of active representation and community engagement throughout the ward.

Questions of local connection and visibility often matter more in municipal elections than they do in provincial or federal campaigns. Voters frequently ask a simple question: "Who do I see in my neighbourhood?" That question may become increasingly important as the campaign progresses.

At this early stage, Ward 4 appears to have evolved into a genuinely competitive three-way contest. Hwang enters as the incumbent, with the advantages of office and an established record to defend. Farr enters with significant name recognition, council experience, and a campaign sharply focused on affordability and fiscal management. Anderson enters as a community-rooted businessman offering a fresh perspective and a less partisan style of leadership.

Each candidate may have a plausible path forward.

The candidate who ultimately succeeds may not be the one with the strongest criticism or the most ambitious vision. It may simply be the candidate who best convinces Ward 4 residents that they understand their everyday concerns and can deliver practical results.

One thing appears certain. Ward 4 is no longer a two-person race.

Before the Ballot- with Ward 4 Candidate Todd Anderson

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 01:49:15 +0000

Welcome to Before the Ballot- with Ward 4 Candidate Todd Anderson.

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

After winding down my construction business following 30 years of ownership and operation, I felt it was time to give back to the community that has given so much to me and my family. I grew up in Ward 4, raised my children here, own property in the ward, and have several family members who continue to call it home. Ward 4 has always been an important part of my life, and I care deeply about its future.

After speaking with many residents and sharing my interest in serving the community as a councillor, I was encouraged by the positive feedback and support I received. Those conversations confirmed my decision to put my name forward. I love Hamilton's East End and am committed to making Ward 4 an even better place to live, work, and raise a family. I am ready to put my decades of business experience, along with my knowledge as a property owner and landlord, to work for the benefit of all residents. By listening to the community, being accountable, and focusing on practical solutions, I hope to help build a stronger and more vibrant Ward 4 for everyone.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

I believe some of the key issues facing Ward 4 are road repairs, homelessness, crime, and responsible tax management. Road repairs must be a priority to maintain public safety and improve quality of life. Several major streets in our ward are in urgent need of repair, and I will advocate for the investments needed to address this infrastructure backlog.

Homelessness and crime are closely connected challenges that require coordinated solutions. I will work with police, social service agencies, and community organizations to identify practical approaches that improve public safety while helping people access the support they need.

I am committed to keeping taxes at a reasonable level and ensuring Ward 4 receives its fair share of funding. I will fight for the tax dollars needed to improve our roads, services, and community amenities. I would also like to see Kenilworth Avenue revitalized by attracting and supporting small businesses, building on the success that Ottawa Street has achieved as a vibrant destination for residents and visitors alike.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

I believe engaging with residents and gathering their feedback is an important step in making the right decisions—not only for Ward 4, but for the entire city. When making decisions, it is important to consider what is in the best interest of the community, both now and in the future. I regularly hear from seniors on fixed incomes who are concerned about their ability to remain in their homes due to significant property tax increases. Their concerns highlight the need to balance the city's financial needs with affordability for residents, particularly those who are most vulnerable to rising costs.

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

As a business owner and landlord, I have spent years negotiating contracts, solving problems, and listening to what people need. Those experiences have taught me the value of hard work, accountability, and open communication.

I am not a politician, but I am committed to learning, working hard, and advocating for the residents of Ward 4. I will bring the skills and experience I have gained in business to serve our community with dedication and common sense. You’ve got my ear, and I will be your voice.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

I can be reached on facebook at Todd Anderson, toddandersonward4@gmail.com or simply give me a call at 905 962-8440

Thank-you Todd for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

Before the Ballot- with Ward 3 Candidate Kristeen Sprague

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 04 Jun 2026 04:30:00 +0000

Welcome to Before the Ballot- with Ward 3 Councillor Candidate Kristeen Sprague.

What motivated you to run for council, and why do you believe now is the right time for new leadership in your ward?

I believe we needed a change, and I believe in this city. Now is the right time because our voices have been forgotten and no one's hearing them. I believe in the North End, and that everyone has a right to say what they feel.

Every ward has its own unique challenges. What do you believe are the top three issues facing residents in your ward today, and how would you address them?

a) Businesses are not getting a tax break. I would take a look at the budget to see what is needed to do things. b) People's garbage isn't being picked up properly. I would tell the city employees to take more time with their work. There has been glass on the road and cleanup needs to be better. c) I want to listen to people's needs. I've heard people want a dog park, and ask why the land is polluted when we have the means to solve that problem, and install a garden there.

Municipal government often requires balancing competing interests and difficult budget decisions. How would you approach making tough decisions at City Hall?

I will see what other councillors are saying, but I will always hear what Ward 3 needs first. If there is a lot of red tape, I will ask why and how we can fix that, and make sure things are addressed in the proper way.

What experience, skills, or perspective do you bring that distinguishes you from other candidates seeking the same council seat?

I was on an advisory committee for the city of Hamilton. I have sat on the police advisory committee, and have spent much time in the public eye. I also sit on the board of directors for the AIDS Network.

What is the best way for voters to contact you and/or learn more about you?

You can telephone me or email me at my email address. (kristeensprague89@gmail.com / 905 906 4752).

Thank you again for your questions. I hope that helped you out.
Yours truly,
Candidate for Ward 3
Kristeen Sprague

Thank-you Kristeen for engaging with Hamiltonians on The Hamiltonian!

9 or 12? - Statecraft and Accountability

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 04 Jun 2026 02:17:11 +0000

9 Cuts or 12?

In an effort to help contain property tax increases, the City of Hamilton has reduced its grass-cutting schedule from 12 cuts per season to 9. The rationale is straightforward: three fewer cuts translate into measurable cost savings.

The decision has sparked considerable discussion on social media, with some councillors emphasizing that they did not support the reduction and suggesting they may seek to revisit the issue if public complaints continue.

It is an easy debate to get drawn into. After all, overgrown grass is visible. Residents see it. They experience it. They talk about it.

Yet the focus on whether Hamilton should cut grass nine times or twelve risks diverting attention from much larger questions about municipal management, accountability, and priorities.

The financial impact of the city allowing itself to fall victim to a major cyberattack that reportedly cost taxpayers millions of dollars dwarfs the savings generated by reducing grass-cutting schedules. One could reasonably argue that the losses associated with the cyberattack would have funded enhanced grass maintenance for years.

According to publicly available information, Mayor Andrea Horwath's total compensation in 2024, including board and agency remuneration, was approximately $271,181.49.

City Manager Marnie Cluckie's compensation is significantly higher, reflecting her role as the municipality's chief administrative officer responsible for thousands of employees and a multi-billion-dollar organization. Recent public-sector salary disclosures have placed her compensation in the range of approximately $330,000 to more than $400,000 annually when salary and taxable benefits are included.

Combined, those figures exceed $670,000 annually.

Compensation itself is not the issue. Municipal leadership carries enormous responsibility and should be compensated accordingly. The more important question is accountability.

To date, questions remain regarding the City's performance management framework. The Hamiltonian has repeatedly asked how many City employees currently have signed performance agreements or performance contracts in place. Despite multiple inquiries, a clear and comprehensive answer has not been provided. We have also asked why a formal performance contract is not in place for the City Manager.

Similarly, questions have been raised regarding how performance expectations are measured, monitored, and enforced throughout the municipal organization.

These are not minor issues. They go directly to the heart of how taxpayer dollars are managed and how results are evaluated.

Yet much of the public conversation continues to revolve around whether Hamilton should receive nine grass cuts or twelve.

As Hamilton enters an election year, residents deserve a broader discussion—one that examines not only service levels, but also accountability, transparency, organizational performance, and fiscal stewardship.

The debate should not simply be about the height of the grass.

It should be about the standards to which City Hall holds itself.

Hamilton deserves nothing less. At the ballot, ask yourself if there is adequate accountability for the spending of your tax dollars.