If our presentation tools aren’t you’re thing for whatever reason, we’ve made it easy (and flexible) for you to export proof layouts…

That way you can use your Photojunction designed layouts in your favourite web gallery, slideshow creator etc…

There are a few self explanatory options, so have a play.

Photojunction saves the layouts as JPEGs – here’s an example of a Proof Layout:

To get there:

Album menu > Export > Proof Layouts

Cheers, Danny

People who like this post would also like:

All the options in Slide show can be set as defaults in preferences. Big time saver.

Cheers, Danny

People who like this post would also like:

Photojunction’s Slideshow creator might not be the most full featured app out there, but it’s certainly one of the quickest and it outputs the smallest file size around.

Same deal as Proof Sheets. Right click on the Group or Collection you want to create the slideshow from, and select ‘Create Slideshow’.

Or take the long way round…

Create a new product and select Slideshow from the Project Setup window.

Otherwise, you can also right-click on any layout in the Preview window and select ‘Create Slideshow’.

Here’s a couple of previous posts about Remix’s slideshow feature…

• Remix’s Slideshow feature
• Hiding our light?
• Contextual Slideshows

Cheers, Danny

People who like this post would also like:

All Proof Sheet options can be set as defaults in Photojunction’s Preferences to reflect your preferred and most commonly used settings…a big time saver for a big time saver.

To get there: Photojunction > Preferences > Proof Sheets

And if you didn’t even know we had proof sheets, click here.

Cheers, Danny

People who like this post would also like:

You may have noticed our email has been down for the past couple of days.

We’re glad to report that the problem has apparently now been fixed (a damaged cable) and we’re all back online. Fingers crossed!

Emails sent to us while the server was down may be a little delayed in getting to our inboxes but we’ll respond as soon as we can.

Our apologies again for the inconvenience. It’s a relief to be back on line.

People who like this post would also like:

Proof sheets is a feature we’ve revived from PJ Retro, only it’s now way better… And quicker.

Here’s the quickest way to create Proof Sheets (it only takes two clicks!):

Right click on the Image Group or Collection you want to create Proof Sheets for, and hit ‘Create Proof Sheets‘.

Alternatively you could take the back streets and create Proof Sheets as a new product in the event window:

Hit the plus button (+) next to Products on the accordion menu…

And then select Proof Sheets from the options in the Project Setup window.

Or…

Add them as a new product via the browser menu and select the Proof Sheets option from the Product Setup window as above.

There’s heaps of different options and features to allow you to customise your Proof Sheets, but we’ll wait until next time to talk about those.

See you soon

Cheers, Danny

People who like this post would also like:

We regret to advise that due to a line break outside our control our secure websites and email are down.

That means you can’t access your Queensberry account, Queensberry’s and Photojunction’s registration systems aren’t working and we cannot access your email. Your email should have been received but we can’t get to it: to avoid confusion please don’t resend it unless you don’t hear from us within normal service times once we’re back online.

It could be 24 hours before we’re back up.

Our apologies for the inconvenience. When we get more news we’ll post it here.

People who like this post would also like:

Hi all

What an awesome privilege it’s been to work with Queensberry to develop their Plug-in for Aperture 3!  As a true blue Apple fanboy it’s been a really exciting project to work on.

When Apple came knocking we jumped at a chance to partner with them, but we’ve since had a few clients ask questions like:

- What’s the difference between Aperture 3 and Photojunction?
- Why would you create a plug-in for Aperture when you already make Photojunction?

…And my personal favourite:

- Does this mean Photojunction is dead!?

We think your decision will ultimately be based on personal preference and “what you’re used too”. If you already know Aperture and only want to order digital albums, then it’s probably the perfect solution for you.

But there are some clear differences between Aperture and Photojunction which we wanted to explain, so here is a brief summary:

Aperture is great for designing un-matted “flushmount” albums. And for the sake of our pride and credibility please allow us to say that Photojunction is too! But … there are lots of alternatives: if you insist you could even choose something else entirely.

Aperture isn’t for matted albums … unless you compromise and restrict yourself to pre-designed templates. Queensberry clients have been free-designing for well over a decade so that’s not an option for us. Still, others may be happy with preset templates. Anyway it’s academic: as far as I know there are no matted Aperture templates available at least for now.

First, Aperture is Mac only while Photojunction is cross-platform. That means a lot of pro photographers who can’t use Aperture can use PJ – which is important to album vendors like QBY who depend on tightly integrated design and ordering tools that all their customers can use.

Like Photojunction, Aperture is an end-to-end application. You can design your page layouts, output your print files and upload them to the maker without needing anything else other than your web browser. Queensberry likes that. It means they know your print files will be the right dimensions, they’ll be correctly specified and they’ll be sent to the right server, hopefully with all the necessary information required to make the book.

Aperture is primarily photo editing and management software. Take a look at the ongoing debates on forums like DWF and you’ll see what I mean. Aperture’s “sharing tools”, like book design and slideshows, are really add-ons. Comparatively speaking they hardly get a mention. Some Aperture users, like it or not, will choose other software for those purposes.

On the other hand Photojunction isn’t really for editing images at all. It’s primarily about album design, with some pretty cool sorting, selling and slideshow tools as a bonus. That doesn’t mean you can’t edit your images if you use Photojunction: it integrates closely with your image editor so that you can edit your images and page layouts while you’re working in PJ. In practice most people use PJ and Photoshop in tandem.

Photographer’s workflows vary greatly but in a Photojunction workflow Aperture would generally be “upstream” of PJ. In other words you’d do your image editing in Aperture, export JPGs, TIFs or PSDs and then design your albums in PJ with those. You could sort images either in Photojunction or Aperture, as you prefer. (You could also substitute Lightroom for Aperture in this paragraph if you prefer.)

Aperture album layouts are exported as PDFs. That means in Photoshop terms they’re flattened files. Basically you’d do all your image manipulation in Aperture, then generate the PDFs for your album and upload them to make the book. That’s how the Queensberry plug-in for Aperture works.

To use Queensberry’s words, that’s a print-ready service. Once the PDF is created it can’t be meaningfully colour-corrected or edited as there are no individual layers to work with. At Queensberry we’d just take your Aperture PDFs and print them as received.

But Queensberry also offers a “Full Colour Service” where they colour correct album layouts for their clients. That requires layered PSD files, which Aperture doesn’t generate. Instead you’d need to create your album design in Photojunction, export the layouts as PSDs and send them to QBY for correction, printing and binding.

Finally Photojunction comes with a lot of built-in presets for both labs and album manufacturers (especially Queensberry). Not very sexy but very practical.

As you can see, when it comes to Aperture versus Photojunction it’s not just about personal preference. It’s a question of deciding what type of album you want to order, what work you want to do yourself and what you want to pass on to the vendor.

We think both are great solutions depending on your needs, and acknowledge the final choice is yours. I hope that helps. Let us know what you think!

Cheers, Danny

Apple is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. Aperture is a trademark of Apple Inc.

People who like this post would also like:

Our Collection Builder reduces image sorting (and selling) to a few quick and easy steps.

Here’s a previous post that tells you all about it: Sorting is so easy

Just in case you were wondering, it uses the Smart Full Screen feature too

Cheers, Danny

People who like this post would also like:

Sometimes we have trouble persuading people that Photojunction displays images in overlay albums exactly as they will appear in the album. They think what you see on screen includes the area of the print that will get lost under the mat.

That may be because other programs “grey out” the area that will be hidden (we do the same with photo front covers, but nowhere else). Photojunction hides it completely because we want to show you what the album will look like – no distractions!

Anyway what you on screen is exactly what you’ll see in the album.

Take a look at the image panel of the tools window. It can be a bit hard to see, especially with a light colour image, because it’s small scale – but try pushing the selection box in the crop window out to the very edge of the image. You can do it with digital and pagemount pages, but not in an overlay album – because PJ knows it needs to reserve some pixels for the bit of the image that will covered by the mat. What you see is what you’ll get.

Cheers, Ian

People who like this post would also like: