<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title type="text">The Media Pundit</title>
  <logo>http://mediapundit.net/images/site/atom-rss-logo.jpg</logo>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2007-07-16://1</id>
  <updated>2014-03-03T05:00:11Z</updated>
  <subtitle type="text">Media criticism and opinion journalism covering television, feature films, and games.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.38</generator>
  <rights>Copyright (c) 2007-2014, Paul William Tenny. All Rights Reserved.</rights>
  <entry>
    <title type="text">2014 Academy Award Winners</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2014/03/2014-academy-award-winners.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2014://1.1490</id>
    <updated>2014-03-03T04:57:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">2014 Academy Award winners</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Category</strong></span></td>
<td><span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Winners</strong></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Picture</strong></td>
<td>
<p>American Hustle <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GMV8LIO/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B00GMV8LIO&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(Blu-ray+DVD: $24.96)</a><br /> Captain Phillips <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B008JFUNNM/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B008JFUNNM&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(Blu-ray+DVD: $22.77)</a><br /> Dallas Buyers Club <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GUO2SKA/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B00GUO2SKA&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(</a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GUO2SKA/ref=as_li_qf_sp_asin_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B00GUO2SKA&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(DVD: $6.99)</a><br /> Gravity <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H83EUL2/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00H83EUL2&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(Blu-ray+DVD: $22.99)</a> <br /> Her <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H9HZGQ0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00H9HZGQ0&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(Blu-ray+DVD: $24.99)</a> <br /> Nebraska <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H9L26AA/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00H9L26AA&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(DVD: </a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H9L26AA/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00H9L26AA&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">$16.99)</a> <br /> Philomena <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GSBMNOQ/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00GSBMNOQ&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(DVD: </a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GSBMNOQ/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00GSBMNOQ&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">$18.99)</a><br /><strong><span style="font-size: medium;">Winner: </span><span style="font-size: medium;">12 Years a Slave <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00G4Q3KOC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00G4Q3KOC&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(DVD: </a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00G4Q3KOC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00G4Q3KOC&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">$14.99)</a> </span></strong><br /> The Wolf of Wall Street <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H9KKGTO/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00H9KKGTO&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">(DVD: </a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00H9KKGTO/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00H9KKGTO&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=themedpun-20">($16.99)</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Original Screenplay</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Spike Jonze (Her)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Adapated Screenplay</strong></td>
<td>
<p>John Ridley (12 Years a Slave)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Actor</strong> (Lead)</td>
<td>
<p>Matthew McConaughey (Dallas Buyers Club)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Actress</strong> (Lead)</td>
<td>
<p>Cate Blanchett (Blue Jasmine)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Actor</strong> (Supporting)</td>
<td>
<p>Jared Leto (Dallas Buyers Club)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Actress</strong> (Supporting)</td>
<td>
<p>Jupita Nyong'o (12 Years a Slave)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Director</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Alfonso&nbsp;Cuarón (Gravity)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr size="1">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Animated Feature</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Frozen</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Cinematography</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Emmanuel&nbsp; Lubezki (Gravity)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Costume Design</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Catherine Martin (The Great Gatsby)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Documentary</strong> (Feature)</td>
<td>
<p>20 Feet from Stardom</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Documentary</strong> (Short)</td>
<td>
<p>The Lady in Number 6: Music Saved My Life</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Film Editing</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Alfonso Cuarón, Mark Sanger (Gravity)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Foreign Language Film</strong></td>
<td>
<p>The Great Beauty</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Makeup and Hairstyling</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Adruitha Lee, Robin Mathews (Dallas Buyers Club)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Original Score</strong></td>
<td>
<p>Steven Price (Gravity)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Original Song</strong><br /></td>
<td>
<p>Let It Go (Frozen)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Production Design</strong><br /></td>
<td>
<p>Cahterine Martin, Beverley Dunn (The Great Gatsby)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Animated Short Film</strong><br /></td>
<td>
<p>Mr. Hublot</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Live Action Short Film</strong><br /></td>
<td>
<p>Helium</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Sound Editing</strong><br /></td>
<td>
<p>Glenn Freemantle (Gravity)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Best Visual Effects</strong><br /></td>
<td>
<p>Tim Weber, Chris Lawrence, Dave Shirk, Neil Corbould (Gravity))</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="academyawards" label="Academy Awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">2014 Academy Awards nominations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2014/03/2014-academy-awards-nominations.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2014://1.1489</id>
    <updated>2014-03-02T22:30:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">List of 2014 Oscar nominees and links to Best Picture DVDs.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 498; float: center; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 498; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/BEST-PICTURE-POSTERS.jpg" alt="" /><br /></div>
</div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2014/03/2014-academy-awards-nominations.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="academyawards" label="Academy Awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">World War Z&apos;s chaotic production revealed</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2013/05/world-war-zs-chaotic-production-revealed.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2013://1.1395</id>
    <updated>2013-05-31T18:40:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">A long re-telling of creative conflicts, rookie mistakes, discarded writers, blown budgets, and finding the heart of a tentpole zombie flick.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>If anyone is still reading this, I strongly suggest that you read a lengthy Vanity Fair piece on the production chaos that plagued World War Z.</p>
<p>I personally found it amusing, the job role of the person who came in to "save the day" at the end. I won't say because I don't want to spoil.</p>
<p>That mess reminded me of similar problems suffered by the production of Gladiator, and what it took to get that film back on track. It's the characters and story. It always is.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/i.0.brad-pitt-world-war-z.jpg"></a></p>
<div style="width: 150; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;"><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/i.0.brad-pitt-world-war-z.jpg"> </a>
<div style="width: 150; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a href="http://politics.mediapundit.net/images/i.0.brad-pitt-world-war-z.jpg"></a><a title="Brad Pitt/World War Z http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2013/06/brad-pitt-world-war-z-drama" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/i.0.brad-pitt-world-war-z.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2013/05/i.0.brad-pitt-world-war-z-thumb-150x101-727.jpg" alt="Brad Pitt/World War Z http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2013/06/brad-pitt-world-war-z-drama" /></a><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: 10px; color: #999;">Brad Pitt/World War Z<br /></span></div>
<p><a title="Brad's War" href="http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2013/06/brad-pitt-world-war-z-drama">Brad's War</a></p>
<p>In World War Z, Brad Pitt's first attempt to build himself an action franchise, he would try to save the world from zombie domination. But amid delays, on-set drama, and rumors that the budget had ballooned above $200 million and that Pitt had clashed with director Marc Forster, Hollywood began to wonder if Paramount's thriller was dead on arrival. As the blockbuster finally hits theaters, Laura M. Holson reports on the behind-the-scenes battles, the re-writes and reshoots, and the stakes involved</p>
</blockquote>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="bradpitt" label="Brad Pitt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="jmichaelstraczynski" label="J. Michael Straczynski" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="marcforster" label="Marc Forster" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="paramountpictures" label="Paramount Pictures" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="worldwarz" label="World War Z" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">New on DVD: Army Wives, Total Recall, Shameless, Funny or Die, Californication, 14 more..</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/12/new-on-dvd-army-wives-total-recall-shameless-funny.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1339</id>
    <updated>2012-12-17T12:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Army Wives S6, Californication S5, Funny or Die S2, Shameless S2, Total Recall and more. Pre-order now and public release tomorrow.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>Here are the television shows available for pre-order on DVD, to be released on <strong>December 18th</strong>:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table style="margin: 0px auto; font-size: 0.8em;" border="0" width="630">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" colspan="3">
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;">New TV Shows<br /></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-large;"><br /></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009AYNOYQ/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51hAt8AHdPL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009AYNOYQ/">Army Wives: Season Six - Part Two<br /></a><strong>Also</strong>: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Army-Wives-Season-Six-Part/dp/B007WWRINQ/ref=pd_bxgy_mov_text_y">Season Six - Part 1</a> (Now!)<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009AYNOYQ/"></a></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009DA74ES/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51X7yqbtD6L._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><strong>Californication: The Fifth Season (2011)</strong><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Californication-Season-5/dp/B00AH8U3UC/ref=tmm_aiv_title_0">Amazon Streaming</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Californication-Season-5-HD/dp/B00AH8U4OW/ref=tmm_aiv_title_1">Amazon Streaming HD</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009DA74ES/">DVD</a> (2-Disc)<br /></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B004EPYZKS/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51h04hB4nxL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /><br />Funny or Die Presents: Season Two (2011)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="182">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B008XJM6H0/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51fZvq54VVL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B008XJM6H0/">Masters of the Universe - 30th Anniversary Limited Edition</a></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009GUSWDM/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51fRtxGU2VL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009GUSWDM/">Heres Lucy Season 6 (1968)</a></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009DA74O8?ie=UTF8&amp;redirect=true"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/518oLirO-yL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><strong>House of Lies: Season One (2011)</strong><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/House-of-Lies-Season-1/dp/B00AHSS0PC/ref=tmm_aiv_title_0">Amazon Streaming</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/House-Lies-Season-1-HD/dp/B00AHSRZXU/ref=tmm_aiv_title_1">Amazon Streaming HD</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B009DA74O8?ie=UTF8&amp;redirect=true">DVD</a> (2-Disc)<br /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009S0VGJ2/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51E5LFIMCHL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B009S0VGJ2/">The Life and Times of Wyatt Earp: Fan Favorites</a></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B005LAJ18G/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51SBBqsw7YL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B005LAJ18G/">The Life &amp; Times of Tim: The Complete Third Season (2011)</a></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0096W46PS/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51nZqGw-eWL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0096W46PS/">Quincy, M.E.: Season Four (1976)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0096W4702/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51AEVMHsM4L._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0096W4702/">The Sarah Silverman Program: Season Three (2007)</a></td>
<td style="text-align: center;" valign="top" width="182"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0090XPH06/"><img style="border: 0;" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51j1ZE29PYL._SL500_AA300_.jpg" alt="" height="150" width="150" /></a><br /><strong>Shameless: The Complete Second Season (2012)</strong><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shameless-The-Complete-Second-Season/dp/B008XFB05I/ref=tmm_aiv_title_0">Amazon Streaming</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shameless-The-Complete-Second-Season/dp/B008XFAMYS/ref=tmm_aiv_title_1">Amazon Streaming HD</a><br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Shameless-Complete-Second-Season-Blu-ray/dp/B0090XPGXY/ref=tmm_blu_title_0">Blu-Ray</a> (2-Disc)<br /><a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0090XPH06/">DVD</a> (3-Disc)</td>
<td valign="top" width="182">&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>And new movies, also released on the 18th but available for pre-order now (not sure if streaming has to wait until the 18th):</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/12/new-on-dvd-army-wives-total-recall-shameless-funny.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Recently Released" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="recentlyreleased" label="Recently Released" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">David Hewlett to be &quot;reunited with Stargate&apos;s &apos;Destiny&apos;&quot; next year?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/12/david-hewlett-to-be-reunited-with-stargates-destin.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1338</id>
    <updated>2012-12-13T21:15:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">David Hewlett retuning to Destiny?</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 100; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 100; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a title="Canadian actor David Hewlett" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/david-hewlett.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2012/12/david-hewlett-thumb-100x140-678.jpg" alt="Canadian actor David Hewlett" /></a><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: 10px; color: #999;">Canadian actor David<br />Hewlett</span></div>
<p>Is there a new Stargate movie related to <em>Stargate Universe</em> on the horizon, a SyFy original inspired by a <em>SGU</em> set piece or prop, or something else entirely? David Hewlett (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0382110/">IMDb</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Hewlett">Wiki</a>) teased something along those lines on Twitter, but details are beyond scarce:</p>
<div style="width: 450; padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/david-hewlett-tweets-1.png"><img style="border: 0px" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2012/12/david-hewlett-tweets-1-thumb-450x326-680.png" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>I'd prefer the former, would be happy with the latter, but anything written by David has to be better than what's on SyFy these days.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="davidhewlett" label="David Hewlett" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="stargateuniverse" label="Stargate Universe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">More on Modern Family</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/07/more-on-modern-family.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1280</id>
    <updated>2012-07-27T04:09:30Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Addressing some arguments raised in defense of the Modern Family cast, and comparing the ratings of MF, Two and a Half Men, and Desperate Housewives for context.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>There have been one or two developments on the <em>Modern Family</em> story I <a title="&quot;Modern Family&quot; cast delays S4 production, sues 20th Century Fox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/07/modern-family-delays-s4-production-sues-warner-bro.html">posted yesterday</a>, along with some questions and issues raised by people who commented on a version of that story that was syndicated <a href="http://pwtenny.newsvine.com/_news/2012/07/26/12966490-modern-family-cast-delays-s4-production-sues-20th-century-fox">over here</a>. First and foremost, the cast went <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2012/07/update-entire-modern-family-cast-shows-up-for-table-read/">back to doing their jobs</a> yesterday and production seemingly will not be further delayed.</p>
<p>20th Century Fox and the cast are still talking, but the lawsuit remains.</p>
<p>As to comments on the other site, here are some of those issues in no particular order.</p>
<p>1. <em>Modern Family</em> is enormously profitable.</p>
<p>That actually remains to be seen. It's public knowledge that ABC made $164 million in advertising revenue from the show last year. But ABC doesn't produce the show, they just license it from 20th Century Fox. 20th foots the bill to produce the show, which means the real issue is how profitable the show is for them, not ABC.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/07/more-on-modern-family.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Legal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="desperatehousewives" label="Desperate Housewives" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="modernfamily" label="Modern Family" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="twoandahalfmen" label="Two and a Half Men" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">&quot;Modern Family&quot; cast delays S4 production, sues 20th Century Fox</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/07/modern-family-delays-s4-production-sues-warner-bro.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1279</id>
    <updated>2012-07-26T10:50:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">The cast of Modern Family -- already earning over $1.4 million per year -- have delayed production of the fourth season and sued their own studio for more money, after rejecting a raise proposal to $4.4 million per year.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a title="Graph comparing the salary's of the Modern Family cast to the median American household." rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/modern-family-actor-salary-graph.png"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2012/07/modern-family-actor-salary-graph-thumb-200x262-613.png" alt="Graph comparing the salary's of the Modern Family cast to the median American household." /></a><br /></div>
<span style="font-size: 10px; color: #999;">Graph comparing the salary's of the Modern<br />Family cast to the median American<br />household.</span></div>
<p>This is one of the many reasons that people legitimately loathe actors, directors, and other Hollywood celebrities.</p>
<p>A story in THR reports that the cast of <em>Modern Family</em> is <a title="'Modern Family' Cast Sues 20th TV as Contract Renegotiation Turns Ugly" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/modern-family-sues-20th-contract-negotiations-353575">endangering production</a> of the fourth season over plain and simple greed. It may be common practice for actors to try to break their contracts a few years after their show becomes a hit, and it may be just as common for studios to put up with it, because everybody wins in the end.</p>
<p>But that doesn't make it right.</p>
<p>These actors are already earning more for a single episode -- a few weeks worth of work -- than the median American household makes in a year. It would take such a household composed of two working adults almost 32 years to earn as much as these people make in a single season.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/07/modern-family-delays-s4-production-sues-warner-bro.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Legal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="20thcenturyfox" label="20th Century Fox" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="modernfamily" label="Modern Family" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Joss Whedon to succeed Nolan and Abrams as Hollywood&apos;s next big thing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/04/joss-whedon-to-succeed-nolan-and-abrams-as-hollywo.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1273</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T21:45:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Move over Chris Nolan and J. J. Abrams. Make room Dark Knight and The Hunger Games. Joss Whedon is about to show you how it&apos;s really done.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/JossWhedon.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2012/04/JossWhedon-thumb-200x120-609.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
</div>
<p>If I were pretending to be him, I might write this line of dialogue:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Good things happen to good people. It's not true, you know. But it ought to be."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>A few weeks from now, it's going to come true for someone who has more than earned it.</p>
<p>If you mention a certain name to most people, you'll probably draw an uncomfortable but brief blank stare, like they are waiting for the punchline of a joke, followed by a glance at the ground and if you look closely, even a squint or two, as they desperately search their memory for clues. Is this someone who was awesome back in the day, but I missed it because I <em>always</em> miss this crap? Is it someone brand new from a generation removed of pop culture that I'm missing because <em>I always miss this crap</em>?</p>
<p>But if you know that name, then you're already hastily throwing together a shrine made from whatever you can grab that's nearby. Pebbles on the side of the road. A doodle on a napkin. An impressive and distinguished mountain of empty pop cans.</p>
<p>Hallowed quotes thatyou can't get from anyone else in the world will inevitably follow:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Someone ever tries to kill you, you try to kill 'em right back. Wife or no, you are no one's property to be tossed aside. You got the right same as anyone to live and try to kill people."</p>
</blockquote>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/04/joss-whedon-to-succeed-nolan-and-abrams-as-hollywo.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Feature" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="firefly" label="Firefly" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="josswhedon" label="Joss Whedon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="theavengers" label="The Avengers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Are directors as interchangable as spark plugs?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/04/are-directors-as-interchangable-as-spark-plugs.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1271</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Directors come and go on television, where all the best stories are told, and even on hugely successful franchise films. Do they even matter anymore?</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>Steve Zeitchick has a <a title="'Catching Fire:' Will it turn out OK without Gary Ross?" href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2012/04/gary-ross-catching-fire-director-replacement-new-lionsgate-hunger-games.html">short piece</a> in an LA Times blog, wondering "what will the [Hunger Games] franchise look like without [Director Gary Ross], and what will his career look like without it?".</p>
<p>I'd take issue with this point:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Recent Hollywood history suggests that, "Harry Potter" notwithstanding, sequels work best when the same director stays with them. "Jurassic Park" took a pretty big dive when Joe Johnston stepped in for Steven Spielberg.  In contrast, a franchise conceived and helmed by one person over the course of its life tends to turn out pretty well (see under: Peter Jackson and the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy).</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is an old and cheap trick, dismissing a very important exception to the proposed new rule precisely because it disproves the thesis of the author. Especially cheap when you don't give a valid reason for doing it, and Zeitchick didn't. It allows you to spend five minutes on a blog post instead of spending an hour or two doing research to find out why the <em>Potter</em> franchise is a standout exception.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/04/are-directors-as-interchangable-as-spark-plugs.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Feature" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="garyross" label="Gary Ross" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="harrypotter" label="Harry Potter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="thehungergames" label="The Hunger Games" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Where The Hunger Games stands against the champs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/04/where-the-hunger-games-stands-against-the-champs.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1270</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T21:06:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Weekend box office numbers for April 13-15, and where The Hunger Games&apos; first installment ranks against the great franchise series films.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/hunger-games-1-poster.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2012/04/hunger-games-1-poster-thumb-200x307-607.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
</div>
<p>First, this past weekend's box office numbers:</p>
<p>1. <strong>The Hunger Games</strong>: $21.5 million ($337m total)<br />2. *<strong>The Three Stooges</strong>: $17.1m<br />3. *<strong>The Cabin in the Woods</strong>: $14.8m<br />4. <strong>Titanic 3D</strong> (2012): $11.6m ($44m)<br />5. <strong>American Reunion</strong>: $10.7m ($39.9)<br />9. *<strong>Lockout</strong>: $6.2m<br />14. <strong>Woman Thou Art Loosed!</strong>: $650,000 (limited release)*+<br />15. <strong>Bully</strong>: $534,000 (limited release)*+</p>
<p><em>*New release.</em><br /><em>+Limited release.</em></p>
<p>These are domestic numbers only. <em>The Hunger Games</em> has earned $531 million worldwide between March 23 and April 15th. Here's how the first installment matches up against other freshman franchise films (title, domestic sales, worldwide gross, budget not including marketing):</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/04/where-the-hunger-games-stands-against-the-champs.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Box Office Booty" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Feature" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="bully" label="Bully" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="cabininthewoods" label="Cabin in the Woods" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="lockout" label="Lockout" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="thehungergames" label="The Hunger Games" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="thethreestooges" label="The Three Stooges" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">House M.D. is ending with its current season</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/02/house-md-is-ending-with-its-current-season.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1224</id>
    <updated>2012-02-08T23:19:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">The producers and star of House M.D. announced this evening that the current season will be its last.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200px; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0pt 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200px; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eeeeee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/house.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2007/07/house-thumb-200x199-3.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
</div>
<p>I just got a press release from FOX that can be summed up thusly:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>After much deliberation, the producers of House M.D. have decided that this season of the show, the 8th, should be the last.  By April this year they will have completed 177 episodes, which is about 175 more than anyone expected back in 2004.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I'm not sure if House would have hung on much longer with its steady decline in ratings, given how much it costs to produce a show -- any show -- in its eighth season. Ratings this year have ranged from 9.78 million for the season premier back in October to a low of 6.63 million in mid-November, but recovering into the 7's and 8's over the past three episodes. Still, that's pretty far away from its highs last year (12.33 for "Family Practice"), for 2009 (17.25 for second season episode "Broken Part 2"), and the all-time high of 29.04 million that watched season four episode "Frozen" with guest star Mira Sorvino.</p>
<p>The current ratings are pretty close what the first half of the first season, so House has really come full circle in that respect.</p>
<p>Eight seasons is a long time for any show and it appears that the producers and star decided enough was enough, not the network.</p>
<p>Too bad. There's nothing else like House on television and maybe there never will be again.</p>
<p>I've included the entire press release after the jump.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/02/house-md-is-ending-with-its-current-season.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="fox" label="FOX" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="house" label="House" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">SyFy&apos;s Being Human - back and better than ever!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/01/syfys-being-human---back-and-better-than-ever.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2012://1.1223</id>
    <updated>2012-01-17T15:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Coming to SyFy&apos;s &quot;Being Human&quot; with a fresh but cautious perspective of yet another remake.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200px; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0pt 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200px; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eeeeee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/syfy-being-human.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2012/01/syfy-being-human-thumb-200x196-593.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
</div>
<p>When I first heard of an American version of the BBC's <em>Being Human</em>, my heart sank. My initial thought was "Did we learn nothing from the epic fail that was MTV's <em>Skins</em>?" Mitchell, George, and Annie were some of the most interesting and original characters I have had the pleasure of meeting in a long time - why would want to change them?</p>
<p>My fear was that the conservativeness of American television would destroy any chance the series had of being interesting. Then I sucked it up and sat down to watched it.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2012/01/syfys-being-human---back-and-better-than-ever.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Kenyth Mogan</name>
      
      
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="beinghuman" label="Being Human" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="syfy" label="SyFy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="syfychannel" label="SyFy Channel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Neverland Hits All the Right Notes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/12/neverland-hits-all-the-right-notes.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1202</id>
    <updated>2011-12-10T19:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Kenyth Mogan reviews the new SyFy channel mini-series, &quot;Neverland&quot;.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>Against recent films like Mega Python vs. Gateroid, Syfy's epic mini-series Neverland is a shining star. Even in comparison to previous mini-series like Alice (2009) and Tin Man (2007) Neverland has set a new standard for the channel that compels it's views to 'imagine greater'.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/12/neverland-hits-all-the-right-notes.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Kenyth Mogan</name>
      
      
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="neverland" label="Neverland" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="syfy" label="SyFy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Entertainment Weekly debunks its own rumor about next Batman flick</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/entertainment-weekly-debunks-its-own-rumor-about-n.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1201</id>
    <updated>2011-10-26T23:27:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">A rumor started by Entertainment Weekly has been confirmed as bullshit, by none other than the intrepid reports at Entertainment Weekly.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/the-dark-knight-rises-photo.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2011/10/the-dark-knight-rises-photo-thumb-200x136-564.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
</div>
<p>There are few things the Hollywood press loves doing more than creating baseless rumors today that they can breathlessly and exclusively report as false and without merit tomorrow. When rumors started flying that <em>Dark Knight Rises</em>&nbsp;might shoot in or near the main Occupy Wall Street protests in New York City, it should have been immediately obvious that this was nothing but a play for attention by starved and ignored media outlets.</p>
<p>Sure enough, a rumor that Entertainment Weekly was more than happy to spread <a title="'The Dark Knight Rises' could film near Occupy Wall Street: Will Batman, once again, save the day?" href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/10/18/dark-knight-rises-occupy-wall-street/">last Tuesday</a> has been shot down <a title="'Dark Knight Rises' not shooting at Occupy Wall Street" href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/10/25/dark-knight-rises-not-shooting-at-occupy-wall-street/">this Tuesday</a>, by none other than Entertainment Weekly.</p>
<p>It was nice of them to schedule the false, baseless rumor to be refuted exactly seven days after they themselves spread it to their readers. But maybe next time they could save themselves the trouble of having to investigate and debunk their own poor reporting by not doing such a shoddy job in the first place.</p>
<p><em>The Dark Knight Rises opens July 20, 2012.</em></p>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Media Criticism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="thedarkknightrises" label="The Dark Knight Rises" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Top Eight Movie Scripts of 2011 - So Far</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/top-eight-movie-scripts-of-2011---so-far.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1200</id>
    <updated>2011-10-25T16:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">A guest post by Isabella Woods.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>There's a great deal of difference between best movie and best screenplay. Some box office favorites are not great movies, but have directors and actors that fill the theaters. It's easy to argue that some screenplays for the top dollar movies are distinctly sub-standard. The opposite can also be seen where great screenplays have a regular director and the movie only sells moderately with the screenplay talked about by academics rather than the theater going public.</p>
<p>For every <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_Cody">Diablo Cody</a> there are hundreds of screen writers trying to emulate her style. The million dollar screenplay deal still exists, but with free movie writing software, everyone and his dog believes they can write a better script than the one you've just seen at the theater. Here's a review of those who have hit the heights so far in 2011.</p>
<p><strong>1.</strong> <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1570728/">Crazy Stupid Love</a></p>
<p>Dan Fogelman&nbsp;is usually a screenplay writer you associate with children's movies after&nbsp;Cars,&nbsp;Bolt&nbsp;and&nbsp;Tangled. This movie obviously takes him out of his usual safe habitat as the drama deals with everyday family life where everyone is linked to someone else in the plot.</p>
<p>Sometimes you just feel and know a screenplay is great - this is one of those occasions. It would a really good screen writer to better this for the January awards month. If you're new to writing screenplays, then study the careful plotting in this script.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/top-eight-movie-scripts-of-2011---so-far.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Isabella Woods</name>
      
      
    </author>
    <category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Netflix lost 800,000 subs in the past 90 days</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/netflix-lost-800000-subs-in-the-past-90-days.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1199</id>
    <updated>2011-10-24T20:46:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Netflix lost $1.44 billion in market value this afternoon after reporting 800,000 customers fled the service in the past three months.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a title="Netflix paper sleeve (http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/)" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/netflix.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2010/01/netflix-thumb-200x153-429.jpg" alt="Netflix paper sleeve (http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/)" /></a></div>
</div>
<p>More (deservedly) bad news for Netflix: despite beating investor expectations on earnings, Netflix <a title="Netflix loses 800,000 subscribers" href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/24/technology/netflix_earnings/">lost 800,000 subscribers</a> in the third quarter this year. That was 3.3% of their base that went up in smoke in just the past three months. That's something like 8,800 subscribers calling it quits <strong>per day</strong>.</p>
<p>To illustrate how ugly this has been, their stock was going for $298 on July 13th. Now it's worth $92/share, down $26 in after hours trading, because of the bad news. And they still expect to lose even more subscribers.</p>
<p>Perhaps it's time to apologize, <em>and</em>&nbsp;roll back the stupid price increase. I would have been willing to pay more because I think Netflix is one of the best deals out there. But not 25% more, with absolutely zero increase in value.</p>
<p>No offense to Reed Hastings who did amazing things until this year, but maybe it's time to get a real CEO running that company now.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Digital Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="netflix" label="Netflix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Winners at the 63rd Primetime Emmy Awards</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/winners-at-the-63rd-primetime-emmy-awards.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1198</id>
    <updated>2011-10-12T17:45:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">The latest iteration of the Emmy Awards was mostly what you&apos;d expect: boring. But there was a surprise or two to be had.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>The Emmy Awards broadcast last month was typically abysmal. Too much time spent on superfluous nonsense that makes you think the show's producers -- who never come back a second time yet don't seem to have their careers harmed by their crimes against television after ruining three hours of your life that you'll never get back -- are auditioning for Broadway. Or, alternately, 4am paid commercials.</p>
<p>The bit where the host "appears" in all of the big shows of the year, wandering from set to set, awkwardly bumping into characters while the host is just playing the host, wasn't that funny when Billy Crystal did it while hosting the Oscars, and isn't wasn't any better from Jane Lynch.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/winners-at-the-63rd-primetime-emmy-awards.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="emmyawards" label="Emmy Awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="modernfamily" label="Modern Family" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Tonight&apos;s premiers: Fringe, A Gifted Man, CSI: NY, Blue Bloods &amp; more</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/tonights-premiers-fringe-a-gifted-man-csi-ny-blue.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1197</id>
    <updated>2011-09-23T21:45:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">A Gifted Man has its series premier on CBS tonight along with some old shows returning, such as Kitchen Nightmares, CSI: New York, and Fringe.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/fringe-wallpaper.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2011/09/fringe-wallpaper-thumb-200x150-560.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
</div>
<p>Here are tonight's premiers and some detailed info on the new shows after the jump. CBS has <em>A Gifted Man</em>&nbsp;(series premier), <em>CSI: New York</em>, and <em>Blue Bloods</em>. FOX has <em>Kitchen Nightmares</em> and <em>Fringe</em> (!). NBC has <em>Dateline</em> returning. ABC has <em>Revenge</em> (series premier). The CW has <em>Nikita</em> and <em>Supernatural</em>.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/tonights-premiers-fringe-a-gifted-man-csi-ny-blue.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="agiftedman" label="A Gifted Man" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="bluebloods" label="Blue Bloods" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="fringe" label="Fringe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="kitchennightmares" label="Kitchen Nightmares" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="supernatural" label="Supernatural" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Tonight&apos;s premiers: Big Bang Theory, The Office, and new series</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/tonights-premiers-big-bang-theory-the-office-and-n.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1196</id>
    <updated>2011-09-22T23:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">New and returning shows for Thursday, September 23rd, 2011. Returning shows include Grey&apos;s Anatomy and The Office, new shows include Charlie&apos;s Angels and Person of Interest, and more.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p>Lots of old shows coming back tonight and a few freshman join the fray. On NBC there's <em>Community, Parks and Recreation, The Office,</em>&nbsp;and series premiers for <em>Whitney</em>&nbsp;and <em>Prime Suspect</em>. CBS will have <em>The Big Bang Theory</em>&nbsp;and <em>The Mentalist</em>&nbsp;returning, and the series premier of <em>Person of Interest</em>. ABC has the return of <em>Grey's Anatomy</em>&nbsp;and the series premier of <em>Charlie's Angels</em>.</p>
<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/person-of-interest.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2011/09/person-of-interest-thumb-200x199-550.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
</div>
<p><strong>Person of Interest</strong>&nbsp;(9pm EST on&nbsp;<strong>CBS</strong>)<br /><span>Mr. Finch (<a title="Michael Emerson" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Emerson">Michael Emerson</a>), a mysterious billionaire, has developed a computer program that predicts the identity of people connected to violent crimes that will take place in the future. </span></p>
<p><span>However, the program has its limitations: for example, it cannot predict whether the person will be a victim, perpetrator, or witness, nor can it predict when or where the crime will take place.</span></p>
<p><span>Unable to stop the crimes on his own, Finch hires John Reese (<a class="mw-redirect" title="Jim Caviezel" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Caviezel">Jim Caviezel</a>), a former<a title="Central Intelligence Agency" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intelligence_Agency">CIA</a>&nbsp;field officer who is presumed dead, to help stop the crimes from taking place.</span>&nbsp;(via&nbsp;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person_of_Interest_(TV_series)">Wikipedia</a>)</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/tonights-premiers-big-bang-theory-the-office-and-n.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="charliesangels" label="Charlie&apos;s Angels" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="personofinterest" label="Person of Interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="primesuspect" label="Prime Suspect" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="whitney" label="Whitney" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Why Eureka got canceled and Warehouse 13 didn&apos;t</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/why-eureka-got-canceled-and-warehouse-13-didnt.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1194</id>
    <updated>2011-09-21T19:56:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Wondering why Eureka just got canceled with 1.87m viewers while Warehouse 13 with 1.82m did not? Find out.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/eureka-cast.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2011/09/eureka-cast-thumb-200x143-548.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
</div>
<p>There's usually only one reason a television show gets cancelled: money. What determines the magic number separating renewal and cancellation are two things: ratings and age. Take these things into account and you'll understand my answer to <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/sledge149/statuses/116287035559510016">this rhetorical question</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>@wilw Monday viewers #Alphas=1.39Mil, #warehouse13=1.82Mil, #Eureka=1.87Mil. Yet WH13=renewed and Eureka canceled. Does this make sense?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My answer: yes, it does.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/why-eureka-got-canceled-and-warehouse-13-didnt.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Ratings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="eureka" label="Eureka" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="syfychannel" label="SyFy Channel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="warehouse13" label="Warehouse 13" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">There is no &quot;Book of Mormon&quot; movie coming</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/there-is-no-book-of-mormon-movie-coming.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1195</id>
    <updated>2011-09-21T16:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Entertainment Weekly&apos;s big exclusive on a feature film version of the &quot;Book of Mormon&quot; play just blew up in their face.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<p><a title="Trey Parker and Matt Stone say they will definitely make a 'Book of Mormon' movie -- EXCLUSIVE" href="http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/09/12/book-of-mormon-movie/#more-47621"><em>Entertainment Weekly</em>, September 12, 2011</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have confirmed to EW that they plan to adapt their Broadway hit The Book of Mormon for the big screen.&nbsp;"Hopefully it will have a big run and a big tour and then we can do the movie in several years," says Parker, who penned the musical with Stone and Avenue Q co-writer Robert Lopez.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a title="Matt Stone, Trey Parker Clarify: No 'Book of Mormon' Movie Currently in the Works" href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/matt-stone-trey-parker-clarify-238002"><em>Hollywood Reporter</em>, September 20, 2011</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Countering recent press reports that suggested a movie version of the Broadway show is in the planning stages, Parker says there's no movie in the works at the moment, [..]</p>
<p>Parker explained that the whole idea of an immanent movie came about when a reporter asked the duo if they would ever consider a feature film version of their hit musical. Said Parker with a laugh, "We said, 'Yeah, I think we could do a Book of Mormon movie,' and they were like, "Book of Mormon Movie! It's coming!'"</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The sad thing is that this kind of behavior isn't limited to the Hollywood press. Our entire media ecosystem operates this way. The criticism that bloggers weren't fit to sit side-by-side with the traditional media because it's just a bunch of unemployed losers writing in their underwear about what their cat had for breakfast was never fair to begin with.</p>
<p>But the ultimate irony is that many bloggers have more integrity and skill and are better journalists than the "real press" are today, and in so many cases it's not even close.</p>
<p>Mistakes this huge deserve a full retraction and an apology for misleading readers. Any bets on when -- if ever -- we see that?</p>
<p><strong>Update<br /></strong>The title of the EW story best illustrates how much liberty they took with the truth: "<strong>Trey Parker and Matt Stone say they will definitely make a 'Book of Mormon' movie -- EXCLUSIVE</strong>"</p>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Media Criticism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="bookofmormon" label="Book of Mormon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Netflix CEO pledges to screw up even more</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/netflix-ceo-pledges-to-screw-up-even-more.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1193</id>
    <updated>2011-09-19T14:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Netflix CEO Reed Hastings admits he screwed up in a message to customers and the public on the company blog, then promises to make things even worse.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a title="Netflix paper sleeve (http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/)" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/netflix.jpg"><br /><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2010/01/netflix-thumb-200x153-429.jpg" alt="Netflix paper sleeve (http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/)" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 10px; color: #999;">(<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798">Source</a>)</span></div>
<p>Everyone got down on Netflix for <a title="Netflix price increase raises monthly fee 60%, splits DVDs by mail, Instant Streaming" href="http://www.gamingtarget.com/article.php?artid=12473">raising prices</a>&nbsp;as much as 60% on all of their plans without providing any increase in value to customers. The excuse was that more free cash for the already hugely profitable company would allow it to buy more streaming content, which is what people really want.</p>
<p>Perhaps that's true, but Starz decided <a title="Netflix Loses Huge Library of Movies from Starz" href="http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/blogs/gear-up/netflix-loses-huge-library-of-movies-from-starz-20110902">not to renew its deal</a> with Netflix for any price and the net result is that all Netflix plan prices went up and a significant amount of streaming content got an expiration label slapped on it at roughly the same time. Tens of millions worth of content will simply vanish in February 28th of next year and you'll already be paying more money for that benefit.</p>
<p>Reed Hastings admitted that his company <a title="An Explanation and Some Reflections" href="http://blog.netflix.com/2011/09/explanation-and-some-reflections.html">didn't handle the price increase very well</a> and yet in the same blog post, promised to screw up even more.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/netflix-ceo-pledges-to-screw-up-even-more.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Digital Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="netflix" label="Netflix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">63rd Primetime Emmy Award Nominations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/63rd-primetime-emmy-award-nominations.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1192</id>
    <updated>2011-09-18T23:12:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">The 2011 Emmy Award nominations (brief).</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eee; margin-bottom: 3px; text-align: center;"><img style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/emmy-awards.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p>You don't need the crap, so here's the short list of nominations for tonight's award ceremony (8pm EST, FOX). My quick takeaway:</p>
<p>NBC, ABC, and FOX got shutout of the best drama category. All of cable got shutout of the best comedy category. That's an odd setup since dramas cost lots and sitcoms are cheap (unless they go on for a long time). You'd expect the cable networks, which have smaller audiences and less money, to go with sitcoms. But they didn't. And it's paying off because the best dramas (except House) are all on cable.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/63rd-primetime-emmy-award-nominations.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Television" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="emmyawards" label="Emmy Awards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Netflix raises prices, loses customers, stock price plummets</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/netflix-raises-prices-loses-customers-stock-price.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1191</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T21:44:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">The results are in: after raising prices as much as 60%, Netflix lost $2 billion in value this afternoon after announcing a loss of 600,000 subscribers as its stock dropped almost 19%.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200px; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0pt 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200px; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eeeeee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a title="Netflix paper sleeve (http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/)" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/netflix.jpg"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2010/01/netflix-thumb-200x153-429.jpg" alt="Netflix paper sleeve (http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/)" /></a></div>
<span style="font-size: 10px; color: #999;">(<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/billselak/2370729798/">Source</a>)</span></div>
<p>Everyone had an opinion about what would happen when Netflix raised prices well beyond reason this year. This was a company on the rise, adding customers by the millions with stock going for $200 a share. Everyone in the major content generation business hated them and customers loved them.</p>
<p>I was one of the latter. Then my plan went from $16 per month to almost $21 a month with no increased service value.</p>
<p>If you predicted that Netflix was going to suffer for that greed, then pop a bottle of bubbly and pat yourself on the back. If you own Netflix stock, open a beer and cry in it. Netflix announced <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/09/netflix-shares-tumble-as-subscribers-leave-following-price-increase.html">it lost 600,000 subscribers</a> in the most recent quarter after estimating growth of 1,000,000. Netflix stock dropped almost 19% today, down $39.46 in after hours trading. That's a loss of about $2 billion in value in eight hours.</p>
<p>Follow the link for the full story at the Los Angeles Times.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: green;">Update</span></strong>: Netflix CEO Reed Hastings <a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/netflix-ceo-pledges-to-screw-up-even-more.html">addressed this mess</a> in a post on the company's blog. His plans for the future include game rental (will cost extra) and other planned screwups.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: green;">Update 2</span></strong>: Netflix announced that it <a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/10/netflix-lost-800000-subs-in-the-past-90-days.html">lost another 800,000 customers</a> in the 3rd quarter (2012). Their stock has lost over $200 in value since July.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Digital Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="netflix" label="Netflix" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>
<entry>
    <title type="text">Actor to Plead Guilty to Leaking Black Swan to BitTorrent</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/actor-to-plead-guilty-to-leaking-black-swan-to-bit.html" />
    <id>tag:www.mediapundit.net,2011://1.1190</id>
    <updated>2011-09-15T21:21:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mediapundit.net/">Feds wasting money on being copyright cops, movies that get pirated early and then make tons of money, and innovate uses for iTunes.</summary>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diveintomark.org/">
      
      <![CDATA[<div style="width: 200px; float: right; padding: 5px; margin: 0pt 7px 15px 15px;">
<div style="width: 200px; padding: 5px; border: 1px solid #eeeeee; margin-bottom: 3px;"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.mediapundit.net/images/new-girl-itunes.png"><img style="border: 1px solid black" src="http://www.mediapundit.net/assets_c/2011/09/new-girl-itunes-thumb-200x193-545.png" alt="" /></a><br /></div>
</div>
<p>Some small beans actor just <a title="Actor to Plead Guilty to Leaking Black Swan to BitTorrent" href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/09/pirate-bay-screener-seeding">pled guilty</a> to spreading films like <em>Black Swan</em> on BitTorrent last year, before they were released in theaters. There's a few things worth writing about here.</p>
<p>First, the specific case of <em>Black Swan</em> is pretty good evidence that piracy of pre-release films doesn't hurt their commercial prospects. Swan cost $13 million to make but earned $329 million at the box office. One could plausibly argue that piracy helped the film instead of harming it.</p>]]>
      <br/><a href="http://www.mediapundit.net/2011/09/actor-to-plead-guilty-to-leaking-black-swan-to-bit.html">Click to read the rest</a>...
    </content>
    <author>
      <name>Paul William Tenny</name>
      <uri>http://mediapundit.net/pwtenny</uri>
      <email>pwtenny@mediapundit.net</email>
    </author>
    <category term="Digital Media" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Film" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Internet" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Legal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" /><category term="Piracy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    <category term="blackswan" label="Black Swan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" /><category term="itunes" label="iTunes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
  </entry>

</feed>