<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Pixar Podcast</title>
	
	<link>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com</link>
	<description>A weekly program about Pixar Animation Studios: interviews, the latest news, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thepixarpodcastcomments" /><feedburner:info uri="thepixarpodcastcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on 064: Academy of Art University, Inside Pixar 2 by Brittany</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/iIrwazDPWqk/64</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1535#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeff!
Thanks for posting your pictures of the event! My friends and I were not fortunate enough to attend the VIP tier, so it was great to see pictures from that. Pixar's new building does look very beautiful.
Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeff!<br />
Thanks for posting your pictures of the event! My friends and I were not fortunate enough to attend the VIP tier, so it was great to see pictures from that. Pixar&#8217;s new building does look very beautiful.<br />
Thanks for sharing!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/iIrwazDPWqk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/64#comment-451</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 064: Academy of Art University, Inside Pixar 2 by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/wSEPR3NSWew/64</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 03:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1535#comment-447</guid>
		<description>Great episode! It was fun hearing from other people who attended the CAM event. I was there with my son and our friend Santi from Spain. We were fortunate enough to attend the VIP tier of the benefit which included a tour of Pixar's new building "Brooklyn" and a special screening of "La Luna" with director Enrico Casarosa. My pictures from the trip are on flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/jtkays/sets/72157628475434127/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great episode! It was fun hearing from other people who attended the CAM event. I was there with my son and our friend Santi from Spain. We were fortunate enough to attend the VIP tier of the benefit which included a tour of Pixar&#8217;s new building &#8220;Brooklyn&#8221; and a special screening of &#8220;La Luna&#8221; with director Enrico Casarosa. My pictures from the trip are on flickr: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jtkays/sets/72157628475434127/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/jtkays/sets/72157628475434127/</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/wSEPR3NSWew" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/64#comment-447</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 061: News: November 22, 2011 by Derrick Clements</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/5DzVS12NWdU/61</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Clements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1453#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Beautiful, Caleb! Well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful, Caleb! Well said!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/5DzVS12NWdU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/61#comment-430</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 061: News: November 22, 2011 by Caleb</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/1KlHX0P7YlM/61</link>
		<dc:creator>Caleb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1453#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Brave vs. The Princess "Problem"

Derrick, et. all;

I appreciated you finding and acknowledging a female perspective on the state of animated features and the roles women have in them. It still bugs me a bit that the female lead has to prove that that she's as tough/strong/smart as a man to be accepted. I do think it is a good thing to show that a woman is a man's equal but why is it always on a man's terms or referencing what are traditionally masculine activities, fighting, shooting, hunting, etc. Why not show more females who are female and equal without being "one of the guys"? That is one thing that I think Tangled did pretty well. Rapunzel is accepted as herself and that was her strength. She wasn't above a little violence, she did smack "Flynn" Eugene around with the frying pan. And yet when presented with a insane situation like the Snugly Duckling's band of brigands her dream and heart are what turned them to her aid instead of flaying Flynn. A good example of a strong female character, is Nani from Lilo and Stich. She is never shown as having to be "one of the guys" to be accepted and ultimately it is her being herself, being open and strong, that helps bring everything together for the happy ending.

There's not a thing wrong w/ the "tough lady" characters, Ripley is one my faves, although it seems like that's given more social weight, and I think it would be worthwhile to have more strong female leads who don't need to be "a dude but better looking". I would want a woman to have the same freedom of choice as a man would, if she wants to be rough and tumble more power to her. If she wants to be a more "traditional" lady that should also be fine. And again she should not have to prove herself "a man" to be free to choose her place.

I admit I'm making some assumptions about the plot of Brave, which are something of a stretch given that all that I've seen is the trailer. I also acknowledge that I will probably go and see this movie and enjoy it. I also believe that my assumed enjoyment of the film does not absolve film makers of stretching themselves and making other types of characters. There is a bit of dialog from the trailer that does give me a lot of hope for this story, "I want my freedom!", "But are you willing to pay the price for your freedom?". I think that is a theme that can really be built upon, and I hope they don't show her paying the price of freedom with her femininity. You shouldn't have to lose who you are to be free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brave vs. The Princess &#8220;Problem&#8221;</p>
<p>Derrick, et. all;</p>
<p>I appreciated you finding and acknowledging a female perspective on the state of animated features and the roles women have in them. It still bugs me a bit that the female lead has to prove that that she&#8217;s as tough/strong/smart as a man to be accepted. I do think it is a good thing to show that a woman is a man&#8217;s equal but why is it always on a man&#8217;s terms or referencing what are traditionally masculine activities, fighting, shooting, hunting, etc. Why not show more females who are female and equal without being &#8220;one of the guys&#8221;? That is one thing that I think Tangled did pretty well. Rapunzel is accepted as herself and that was her strength. She wasn&#8217;t above a little violence, she did smack &#8220;Flynn&#8221; Eugene around with the frying pan. And yet when presented with a insane situation like the Snugly Duckling&#8217;s band of brigands her dream and heart are what turned them to her aid instead of flaying Flynn. A good example of a strong female character, is Nani from Lilo and Stich. She is never shown as having to be &#8220;one of the guys&#8221; to be accepted and ultimately it is her being herself, being open and strong, that helps bring everything together for the happy ending.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s not a thing wrong w/ the &#8220;tough lady&#8221; characters, Ripley is one my faves, although it seems like that&#8217;s given more social weight, and I think it would be worthwhile to have more strong female leads who don&#8217;t need to be &#8220;a dude but better looking&#8221;. I would want a woman to have the same freedom of choice as a man would, if she wants to be rough and tumble more power to her. If she wants to be a more &#8220;traditional&#8221; lady that should also be fine. And again she should not have to prove herself &#8220;a man&#8221; to be free to choose her place.</p>
<p>I admit I&#8217;m making some assumptions about the plot of Brave, which are something of a stretch given that all that I&#8217;ve seen is the trailer. I also acknowledge that I will probably go and see this movie and enjoy it. I also believe that my assumed enjoyment of the film does not absolve film makers of stretching themselves and making other types of characters. There is a bit of dialog from the trailer that does give me a lot of hope for this story, &#8220;I want my freedom!&#8221;, &#8220;But are you willing to pay the price for your freedom?&#8221;. I think that is a theme that can really be built upon, and I hope they don&#8217;t show her paying the price of freedom with her femininity. You shouldn&#8217;t have to lose who you are to be free.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/1KlHX0P7YlM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/61#comment-429</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 061: News: November 22, 2011 by jose</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/JWa2st4IY9Q/61</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1453#comment-414</guid>
		<description>I love when she laughs! I posted on the Pixarblog, now Bigscreenanimation, that the trailer it's a little tangled-ish, if you know what I mean? They aimed at it like it was a comedy, but then was more serious than that, hope that is the same thing, as you say in the podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love when she laughs! I posted on the Pixarblog, now Bigscreenanimation, that the trailer it&#8217;s a little tangled-ish, if you know what I mean? They aimed at it like it was a comedy, but then was more serious than that, hope that is the same thing, as you say in the podcast.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/JWa2st4IY9Q" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/61#comment-414</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 040: “Mominee” Emilie Unkrich by Sherri burch | Acepet</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/PbOJThBDJOg/40</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherri burch | Acepet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=690#comment-411</guid>
		<description>[...] 040: “Mominee” Emilie UnkrichFeb 24, 2011 … Sherri Burch. Posted March 2, 2011 at 12:02 PM. Thank you Emilie and Derrick. I *love* … Trackbacks / Pings. Sherrie burch | Asialegalconsu … [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 040: &#8220;Mominee&#8221; Emilie UnkrichFeb 24, 2011 &#8230; Sherri Burch. Posted March 2, 2011 at 12:02 PM. Thank you Emilie and Derrick. I *love* &#8230; Trackbacks / Pings. Sherrie burch | Asialegalconsu &#8230; [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/PbOJThBDJOg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/40#comment-411</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 059: News: November 8, 2011 by Eve</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/jq0Hhxoxp6U/59</link>
		<dc:creator>Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1411#comment-410</guid>
		<description>Awesomesauce for bringing up The Adventures of Tintin; fantastic movie! I think this podcast gets better and better, keep it up guys :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesomesauce for bringing up The Adventures of Tintin; fantastic movie! I think this podcast gets better and better, keep it up guys <img src='http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/jq0Hhxoxp6U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/59#comment-410</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 055: News: October 4, 2011 by jose</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/lUxLzoXUeB8/55</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1334#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Some companies like Sony are already applying it to televisions and such, I think eventually they will try to do it with big movie screens, wich, once done, it will be so natural, because our eyes work in that way to generate the images.

I think it will be a big win for the industry, so they drop the glasses and all this using the 3d effects as a gimmick "hit you in the face" thing wich everyone hates, and just watch a movie and have a cool effect of reality, like if you are in real life with the actors, in the scene, that would be so cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some companies like Sony are already applying it to televisions and such, I think eventually they will try to do it with big movie screens, wich, once done, it will be so natural, because our eyes work in that way to generate the images.</p>
<p>I think it will be a big win for the industry, so they drop the glasses and all this using the 3d effects as a gimmick &#8220;hit you in the face&#8221; thing wich everyone hates, and just watch a movie and have a cool effect of reality, like if you are in real life with the actors, in the scene, that would be so cool!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/lUxLzoXUeB8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/55#comment-369</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 055: News: October 4, 2011 by Derrick Clements</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/i8qnvyKhcP0/55</link>
		<dc:creator>Derrick Clements</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1334#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I will be interested to see a 3D movie without the glasses.  Presumably that would also solve the other problem I have with 3D--the darkening of the image that the glasses do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be interested to see a 3D movie without the glasses.  Presumably that would also solve the other problem I have with 3D&#8211;the darkening of the image that the glasses do.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/i8qnvyKhcP0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/55#comment-368</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 055: News: October 4, 2011 by jose</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~3/RKbnogwVGiA/55</link>
		<dc:creator>jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/?p=1334#comment-367</guid>
		<description>They are doing the 3D thing for two things maybe three, capitalice on all films, avoid piracy at all cost, and maybe finding new ways to improve the technology, they definitely want to find a way to watch 3d without the glasses, so we can see the images while a cell fone or a consumer camera can't put the image together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are doing the 3D thing for two things maybe three, capitalice on all films, avoid piracy at all cost, and maybe finding new ways to improve the technology, they definitely want to find a way to watch 3d without the glasses, so we can see the images while a cell fone or a consumer camera can&#8217;t put the image together.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thepixarpodcastcomments/~4/RKbnogwVGiA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.thepixarpodcast.com/55#comment-367</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

