<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;D0IGRH0-eip7ImA9WhVTEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642</id><updated>2012-02-25T02:38:45.352-05:00</updated><category term="Kata" /><category term="flash" /><category term="Mequiar's" /><category term="bags" /><category term="4" /><category term="sigma" /><category term="pen" /><category term="cleaner" /><category term="movies" /><category term="books" /><category term="First Impressions" /><category term="shopping" /><category term="storage" /><category term="knife" /><category term="toronto" /><category term="coach house press" /><category term="art" /><category term="ttc" /><category term="Apple" /><category term="bottle" /><category term="xootr" /><category term="camera accessories" /><category term="audio" /><category term="plastics" /><category term="linkage" /><category term="motojournalism" /><category term="travel" /><category term="Distillery" /><category term="annex" /><category term="Canadian" /><category term="Behringer" /><category term="Nikon" /><category term="neoprene" /><category term="second thoughts" /><category term="macro" /><category term="3" /><category term="lighting gear" /><category term="LED" /><category term="rant" /><category term="Pelican" /><category term="helicopter" /><category term="6" /><category term="colour" /><category term="Sony" /><category term="Fujifilm" /><category term="gadget infinity" /><category term="expensive" /><category term="language" /><category term="steals" /><category term="Panasonic" /><category term="iPhone" /><category term="micro 4/3" /><category term="5" /><category term="drinks" /><category term="design" /><category term="BillBeebe" /><category term="architecture" /><category term="jewellery" /><category term="WTD" /><category term="bikes" /><category term="green clean" /><category term="packaging" /><category term="NYC" /><category term="headlight" /><category term="Lens" /><category term="Matthew" /><category term="7" /><category term="advertising" /><category term="10" /><category term="Canon" /><category term="comparison" /><category term="monitor" /><category term="batteries" /><category term="computer" /><category term="flashlight" /><category term="background" /><category term="Honeywell" /><category term="KeithAlanK" /><category term="review sample" /><category term="Strobist" /><category term="0" /><category term="ramble" /><category term="2" /><category term="tool" /><category term="Kalt" /><category term="photography" /><category term="culture" /><category term="TV/DVD" /><category term="unrated" /><category term="remote" /><category term="wii" /><category term="music" /><category term="games" /><category term="website" /><category term="Carl Zeiss" /><category term="kleen kanteen" /><category term="9" /><category term="toys" /><category term="Olympus" /><category term="electronics" /><category term="cameras" /><category term="Joby" /><category term="Twelve South" /><category term="1" /><category term="food" /><category term="administration" /><category term="8" /><category term="household" /><category term="preamp" /><category term="Samsung" /><category term="film" /><category term="manfrotto" /><category term="automotive" /><category term="vermin" /><category term="tripod" /><category term="camera bags" /><category term="transportation" /><title>`thew's reviews</title><subtitle type="html">Matthew's Reviews: Your source for diverse and varied reviews of dubious accuracy. Cameras, lenses, transportation, current events, design, electronics and technology, books, TV, music, movies, and more.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>341</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thewsReviews" /><feedburner:info uri="thewsreviews" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0EMR3Y7fCp7ImA9WhRaGU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-2306895005602172462</id><published>2012-02-22T12:27:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-22T12:28:06.804-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-22T12:28:06.804-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="5" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cameras" /><title>Hasselblad 500c/m</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/2306895005602172462/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/hasselblad-500.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/2306895005602172462?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/2306895005602172462?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/UR_Av4paFo0/hasselblad-500.html" title="Hasselblad 500c/m" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  4 out of 5 
Execution:  1 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    As if it matters what I think.

The Long Version:  The Hasselblad 500 is a legend. Immediately recognized and viewed with respect even by non-photographers, it screams 'serious' in a way that few other cameras do. Manufactured for decades, there's a huge base of compatible equipment in use and on the resale market. Some of it is 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PgyyHVNy_kcGG3mtaamP9nAxzVs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PgyyHVNy_kcGG3mtaamP9nAxzVs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PgyyHVNy_kcGG3mtaamP9nAxzVs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/PgyyHVNy_kcGG3mtaamP9nAxzVs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/UR_Av4paFo0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/hasselblad-500.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0ECRXg_fSp7ImA9WhRaF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-9094663909750230055</id><published>2012-02-20T20:54:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-20T21:01:04.645-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-20T21:01:04.645-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="shopping" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="9" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toronto" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="First Impressions" /><title>Opticianado</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/9094663909750230055/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/opticianado.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/9094663909750230055?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/9094663909750230055?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/fqk0EYLAlTc/opticianado.html" title="Opticianado" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept: 4 out of 5 
Execution: 5 out of 5 
Yeah, but:   I'm not that easy to impress.

The Long Version: Okay, I have to admit that I have a good reason to be biased. That doesn't change the fact that Opticianado, at 2919 Dundas West, is my new favourite place to buy glasses. 

Opticianado's location puts it solidly in Toronto's west end, which is a slightly surreal place where the street 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RhFdx4Gge1nYjRsYKb-xPxDQ-HM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RhFdx4Gge1nYjRsYKb-xPxDQ-HM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RhFdx4Gge1nYjRsYKb-xPxDQ-HM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RhFdx4Gge1nYjRsYKb-xPxDQ-HM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/fqk0EYLAlTc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/opticianado.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkcCRng_eyp7ImA9WhRaFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-1420092916004721342</id><published>2012-02-19T14:00:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-19T14:01:07.643-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-19T14:01:07.643-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="linkage" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="7" /><title>Elsewhere on the Internet: Shuttertalk</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/1420092916004721342/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/shuttertalk.html#comment-form" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/1420092916004721342?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/1420092916004721342?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/Xdbyeydskl8/shuttertalk.html" title="Elsewhere on the Internet: Shuttertalk" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  3 out of 5 
Execution:  4 out of 5 
Yeah, but:   I've always preferred small communities.

The Long Version: I've been around on web photography forums for nearly ten years, including several of the big ones and many small ones. I wouldn't be able to count how many it's been, but it doesn't matter because Shuttertalk is the only one I still visit.

"ST" is certainly one of the smaller 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wvR6QSKf5RJ84imGO_qr-3RvG-U/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wvR6QSKf5RJ84imGO_qr-3RvG-U/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wvR6QSKf5RJ84imGO_qr-3RvG-U/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wvR6QSKf5RJ84imGO_qr-3RvG-U/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/Xdbyeydskl8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/shuttertalk.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcDSX49fCp7ImA9WhRbGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-2066704979356115500</id><published>2012-02-10T20:17:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-10T20:17:58.064-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-10T20:17:58.064-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="4" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="camera accessories" /><title>Canon E2 Hand Strap</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/2066704979356115500/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/canon-e2.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/2066704979356115500?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/2066704979356115500?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/LB71Ni8XDXc/canon-e2.html" title="Canon E2 Hand Strap" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  2 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    It's a lateral move.

The Long Version: Camera hand straps are an odd thing. I looked at the Canon E1 strap three years ago, which requires a battery grip with an available strap lug to work. The Canon E2 is different in that it attaches to the tripod socket, so it will work on any camera with or without a battery grip attached. That's 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/abzpgj9P60RT19EnFP6KnWYKjsI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/abzpgj9P60RT19EnFP6KnWYKjsI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/abzpgj9P60RT19EnFP6KnWYKjsI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/abzpgj9P60RT19EnFP6KnWYKjsI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/LB71Ni8XDXc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/canon-e2.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUICRHg9fSp7ImA9WhRbFks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-5176992809131352289</id><published>2012-02-07T21:13:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-07T21:19:25.665-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-07T21:19:25.665-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="6" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPhone" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toys" /><title>Speck "Candyshell Grip" iPhone 4/4S Case</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/5176992809131352289/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/speck-grip.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/5176992809131352289?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/5176992809131352289?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/uB_of8YoiIg/speck-grip.html" title="Speck &quot;Candyshell Grip&quot; iPhone 4/4S Case" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  4 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    I really like their logo.

The Long Version: The worst thing about the Speck Candyshell Grip is the name, and that's the last time I will ever type it in full. I must not be their target market, because that middle wordlike sequence of letters was almost enough to stop me from buying this thing. But careful inspection of the product 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VLGbSP40Ory7OW-h65EZOPHVGxE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VLGbSP40Ory7OW-h65EZOPHVGxE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VLGbSP40Ory7OW-h65EZOPHVGxE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VLGbSP40Ory7OW-h65EZOPHVGxE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/uB_of8YoiIg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/speck-grip.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8DSHc9fCp7ImA9WhRbFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-395342205661612087</id><published>2012-02-05T21:01:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-05T21:04:39.964-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-05T21:04:39.964-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bottle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="4" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="kleen kanteen" /><title>Kleen Kanteen Flip D-Ring Cap</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/395342205661612087/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/d-ring-flip-cap.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/395342205661612087?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/395342205661612087?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/tF3WIkBQ_Vg/d-ring-flip-cap.html" title="Kleen Kanteen Flip D-Ring Cap" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  2 out of 5 
Yeah, but:   Who doesn't love carabiners?

The Long Version: While my household has a growing collection of Kleen Kanteen bottles – seven and counting – the D-Ring Flip is the first extra cap I've bought. It fits their wide-mouth bottles, of which I own two, and it changes them to have a boxier profile. Like the other wide-mouth caps, the interior is
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HAtHZ6PsDwdVgMkyAkEURlYjVZg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HAtHZ6PsDwdVgMkyAkEURlYjVZg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HAtHZ6PsDwdVgMkyAkEURlYjVZg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/HAtHZ6PsDwdVgMkyAkEURlYjVZg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/tF3WIkBQ_Vg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/d-ring-flip-cap.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cASHg4eSp7ImA9WhRbEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-6178429910155562999</id><published>2012-02-01T21:47:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-01T21:50:49.631-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-01T21:50:49.631-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="rant" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="2" /><title>Zoom With Your Feet</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/6178429910155562999/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/zwyf.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6178429910155562999?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6178429910155562999?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/6jx9B136Is4/zwyf.html" title="Zoom With Your Feet" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  1 out of 5 
Execution:  1 out of 5 
Yeah, but: "'Not the same thing a bit!' said the Hatter."

The Long Version: There's a lot of truly bad photographic advice out there, but I can't think of anything worse than these four simple words: Zoom With Your Feet.

The idea behind it is that moving the camera forward or backwards is equivalent to changing the focal length of a lens. It looks 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BoaeAXhcNrfH-aqHk9gfBxGR61M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BoaeAXhcNrfH-aqHk9gfBxGR61M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BoaeAXhcNrfH-aqHk9gfBxGR61M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BoaeAXhcNrfH-aqHk9gfBxGR61M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/6jx9B136Is4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/02/zwyf.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEcDRH84cSp7ImA9WhRUGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-4187187580012833648</id><published>2012-01-29T22:50:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-30T07:21:15.139-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-30T07:21:15.139-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lens" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Olympus" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BillBeebe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="micro 4/3" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Panasonic" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cameras" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="7" /><title>Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH.</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/4187187580012833648/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/panasonic-lumix-g-20mm-f17-asph.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4187187580012833648?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4187187580012833648?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/qBLAiRrM6bA/panasonic-lumix-g-20mm-f17-asph.html" title="Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH." /><author><name>Bill Beebe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06749942763035029635</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="24" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_cfeRiRRanuk/TSfsyQP1QlI/AAAAAAAABlM/YZWuDKwCkMg/S220/EP077199.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept: 4 out of 5 
Execution: 3 out of 5 
Yeah, but: So what took me so long?

The Long Version:

This is the second review of this lens. Matthew wrote the first, an excellent review when he purchased his copy over a year and a half ago. Rather than repeat what he wrote, I'll refer you to his review. I'll wait here while you go and read it.

I first considered the 20mm when Matthew wrote his 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-OjQfeJ7WzUtqbfBqsAG-y6AKw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-OjQfeJ7WzUtqbfBqsAG-y6AKw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-OjQfeJ7WzUtqbfBqsAG-y6AKw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b-OjQfeJ7WzUtqbfBqsAG-y6AKw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/qBLAiRrM6bA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/panasonic-lumix-g-20mm-f17-asph.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkcNQXc8fCp7ImA9WhRUGUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-529346916716047432</id><published>2012-01-27T20:35:00.017-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-30T13:28:10.974-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-30T13:28:10.974-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="6" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lens" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Olympus" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BillBeebe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="micro 4/3" /><title>M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/529346916716047432/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/mzuiko-digital-ed-40-150mm-f40-56-r.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/529346916716047432?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/529346916716047432?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/lkuGUemufMU/mzuiko-digital-ed-40-150mm-f40-56-r.html" title="M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f4.0-5.6 R" /><author><name>Bill Beebe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/06749942763035029635</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="24" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_cfeRiRRanuk/TSfsyQP1QlI/AAAAAAAABlM/YZWuDKwCkMg/S220/EP077199.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept: 3 out of 5 
Execution: 3 out of 5 
Yeah, but: It's just dandy for what it sells for.

Background:
Olympus has a habit of re-introducing two zoom lenses repeatedly. One lens is the 14-42mm 1:4-5.6 kit lens. The other zoom lens that Olympus has released repeatedly is the 40-150mm zoom. It first appeared along with the 14-45mm when the Olympus E-300 was introduced. It was a rather large 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0uk3076SV4-MaC73X9Wdn4ukyV4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0uk3076SV4-MaC73X9Wdn4ukyV4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0uk3076SV4-MaC73X9Wdn4ukyV4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0uk3076SV4-MaC73X9Wdn4ukyV4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/lkuGUemufMU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/mzuiko-digital-ed-40-150mm-f40-56-r.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkENRX84fyp7ImA9WhRUFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-6052098426854548574</id><published>2012-01-26T23:31:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-26T23:31:34.137-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-26T23:31:34.137-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="6" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toronto" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="food" /><title>Panera Bread, Yonge Street Location</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/6052098426854548574/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/panera-bread.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6052098426854548574?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6052098426854548574?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/qPKFkEdCpcM/panera-bread.html" title="Panera Bread, Yonge Street Location" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  4 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    My very first Review By Proxy.

The Long Version: I've never eaten at the new Panera Bread location on Yonge street at Edward, and based on what I've heard from other people, I never will. Despite only being open for one week, I've had four of my co-workers spontaneously start to rave about it, and I hear people talking excitedly about 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CzfTPhUqLss2DHwTknL1VkbFZzs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CzfTPhUqLss2DHwTknL1VkbFZzs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CzfTPhUqLss2DHwTknL1VkbFZzs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/CzfTPhUqLss2DHwTknL1VkbFZzs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/qPKFkEdCpcM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/panera-bread.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0cASHczeip7ImA9WhRbGUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-2518896773947710106</id><published>2012-01-21T15:12:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2012-02-11T14:37:29.982-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-02-11T14:37:29.982-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="8" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tool" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toys" /><title>TT Pocket Tools: Chopper, Keeper, and Simple</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/2518896773947710106/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/tt-pocket-tools.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/2518896773947710106?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/2518896773947710106?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/iNnqF1WjbJE/tt-pocket-tools.html" title="TT Pocket Tools: Chopper, Keeper, and Simple" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  4 out of 5 
Execution:  4 out of 5 
Yeah, but:   Who doesn't love little bits of metal? 

The Long Version: To give credit where it's due, I learned about TT Pockettools because of a review on the excellent Every Day Commentary blog. The author of that site is phenomenally hard-working, and there's a fair bit of overlap in our interests. If he starts getting into cameras, I may have to
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3qS01fB3QQEYwkZJAJtD7RwIyv4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3qS01fB3QQEYwkZJAJtD7RwIyv4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3qS01fB3QQEYwkZJAJtD7RwIyv4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/3qS01fB3QQEYwkZJAJtD7RwIyv4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/iNnqF1WjbJE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/tt-pocket-tools.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0UHRnY_cSp7ImA9WhRVGEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-4821398475567662024</id><published>2012-01-17T21:48:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-17T23:33:57.849-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-17T23:33:57.849-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="culture" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="website" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="0" /><title>SOPA/PIPA</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/4821398475567662024/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/sopapipa.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4821398475567662024?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4821398475567662024?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/HYtsxfZwG4I/sopapipa.html" title="SOPA/PIPA" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  0 out of 5 
Execution:  0 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    If it's pro-business and the Globe And Mail still hates it, it's really bad.

The Long Version: I have an odd relationship with American copyright law. I'm affected by it without being subject to it, but Canadian copyright law – at least under the Conservative government – will eventually aspire to match it. So I've only been paying 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9wKnwvXbpnALQ_Ke6QWnLX7Eh7c/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9wKnwvXbpnALQ_Ke6QWnLX7Eh7c/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9wKnwvXbpnALQ_Ke6QWnLX7Eh7c/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/9wKnwvXbpnALQ_Ke6QWnLX7Eh7c/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/HYtsxfZwG4I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/sopapipa.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEMRnkyfip7ImA9WhRVGEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-4423112619940917168</id><published>2012-01-16T20:46:00.010-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-17T22:51:27.796-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-17T22:51:27.796-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="6" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fujifilm" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="film" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cameras" /><title>Fujifilm GA645Zi</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/4423112619940917168/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/fujifilm-ga645zi.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4423112619940917168?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4423112619940917168?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/Jx_Gaq0BhH8/fujifilm-ga645zi.html" title="Fujifilm GA645Zi" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  3 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Despite its large size, it's a very small camera.

The Long Version: Fujifilm makes good cameras, and always have. While their most recent renaissance has surprised everyone, including Fuji, they have a long tradition of making quirky cameras that are genuinely designed for photographers. That must be why they also release more cheap 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cxU9brf_K_Lr-IsTZ9cPBzFKJQY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cxU9brf_K_Lr-IsTZ9cPBzFKJQY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cxU9brf_K_Lr-IsTZ9cPBzFKJQY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/cxU9brf_K_Lr-IsTZ9cPBzFKJQY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/Jx_Gaq0BhH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/fujifilm-ga645zi.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEAMQ388eSp7ImA9WhRVFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-5484032200434580861</id><published>2012-01-11T21:51:00.017-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-12T21:46:22.171-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-12T21:46:22.171-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="8" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canon" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cameras" /><title>Canon Powershot S100</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/5484032200434580861/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/canon-s100.html#comment-form" title="10 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/5484032200434580861?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/5484032200434580861?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/0G125nLrBBk/canon-s100.html" title="Canon Powershot S100" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>10</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  4 out of 5 
Execution:  4 out of 5 
Yeah, but:  I never say "Highly Recommended"…

The Long Version: I've never been a stickler for image quality from a compact camera. I simply categorize them as acceptable or unacceptable, and to a large extent that also takes their other abilities into consideration. Everything in photography is a compromise. It's normally enough that a little 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VPj7PFfXtQn2lu_K_LP6jFejg6w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VPj7PFfXtQn2lu_K_LP6jFejg6w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VPj7PFfXtQn2lu_K_LP6jFejg6w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VPj7PFfXtQn2lu_K_LP6jFejg6w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/0G125nLrBBk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/canon-s100.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEFQHY8eSp7ImA9WhRVEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-6389962407577034716</id><published>2012-01-06T20:34:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-09T20:23:31.871-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-09T20:23:31.871-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="household" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="4" /><title>Fred Cutting Board</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/6389962407577034716/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/fred-cutting-board.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6389962407577034716?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6389962407577034716?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/vn6dwejh0DI/fred-cutting-board.html" title="Fred Cutting Board" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  3 out of 5 
Execution:  1 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Funny, yes.

The Long Version: Sometimes you might as well just write my name on something. Penny bought me this after she caught me measuring the carrot sticks – I wanted to ensure that I cut the celery to the same size. After all, I don't want one settling to the bottom of the container when I'm packing my lunch. This cutting board 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/idFeAupYc4WwSiNr7W3gokV4bgs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/idFeAupYc4WwSiNr7W3gokV4bgs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/idFeAupYc4WwSiNr7W3gokV4bgs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/idFeAupYc4WwSiNr7W3gokV4bgs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/vn6dwejh0DI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2012/01/fred-cutting-board.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkINQnkzeyp7ImA9WhRVEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-4151670818495607747</id><published>2011-12-30T20:30:00.017-05:00</published><updated>2012-01-09T20:23:13.783-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-09T20:23:13.783-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="4" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ttc" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toronto" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="transportation" /><title>"Toronto Rocket" LED Subway Maps</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/4151670818495607747/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/led-subway-maps.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4151670818495607747?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4151670818495607747?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/3YwAob1NdO8/led-subway-maps.html" title="&quot;Toronto Rocket&quot; LED Subway Maps" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  3 out of 5 
Execution:  1 out of 5 
Yeah, but:  Just look at how shiny it is!

The Long Version: Toronto has been working hard on its transit system recently. Just this year the city has decided that transit is so essential that the workers who run it lost their right to strike, but not so essential that the system should actually be properly funded or given priority in transportation 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DO_KZG2-qTtJp8KxdiUBMD6x8uY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DO_KZG2-qTtJp8KxdiUBMD6x8uY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DO_KZG2-qTtJp8KxdiUBMD6x8uY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DO_KZG2-qTtJp8KxdiUBMD6x8uY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/3YwAob1NdO8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/led-subway-maps.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0EBSHs5eip7ImA9WhRXF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-5427118320990861289</id><published>2011-12-24T19:07:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-24T19:07:39.522-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-24T19:07:39.522-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="drinks" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Canadian" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toys" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="7" /><title>Drink Toque</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/5427118320990861289/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/drink-toque.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/5427118320990861289?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/5427118320990861289?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/tOGNC9oG3jM/drink-toque.html" title="Drink Toque" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  4 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Quick, guess which country it's from.

The Long Version: Humour counts for a lot, and The Drink Toque makes the most of it. It's really just a can cozy, but it's knitted instead of being made out of the ubiquitous neoprene and foam rubber. It's perfect for lounging around in our typical Canadian weather.


To compliment this fairly 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k8ohQ-rZhW89oD-Yy7o0AMGkrSE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k8ohQ-rZhW89oD-Yy7o0AMGkrSE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k8ohQ-rZhW89oD-Yy7o0AMGkrSE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/k8ohQ-rZhW89oD-Yy7o0AMGkrSE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/tOGNC9oG3jM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/drink-toque.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUENRnk_eSp7ImA9WhRXFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-4863011799249127954</id><published>2011-12-20T21:14:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-20T21:14:57.741-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-20T21:14:57.741-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="5" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="camera accessories" /><title>Domke Camera Straps</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/4863011799249127954/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/domke-camera-straps.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4863011799249127954?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4863011799249127954?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/bv-8dskKkaI/domke-camera-straps.html" title="Domke Camera Straps" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Yeah, they're hard to be excited about.

The Long Version: Domke Camera straps come in two main varieties: swivel and non-swivel. Me being me, I own both, which has given me a good opportunity to compare them.

While there's also a model that's 1.5" wide, I prefer the 1" wide strap. The centre of the strap is just like the ones on Domke
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pplglNbi66YOCjQBwPHEeUR1JPI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pplglNbi66YOCjQBwPHEeUR1JPI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pplglNbi66YOCjQBwPHEeUR1JPI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pplglNbi66YOCjQBwPHEeUR1JPI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/bv-8dskKkaI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/domke-camera-straps.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAGQXk8fCp7ImA9WhRQF0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-8120324157909279319</id><published>2011-12-12T21:12:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-12T22:42:00.774-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-12T22:42:00.774-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="6" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="tool" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="knife" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toys" /><title>Helle Viking</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/8120324157909279319/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/helle-viking.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/8120324157909279319?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/8120324157909279319?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/w0eJIEFZNis/helle-viking.html" title="Helle Viking" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  3 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:  I'm admiring its vintage feel.

The Long Version: Certain things are so ugly that they're attractive. This is an understandable evolutionary advantage, as anyone who has seen a newborn baby can attest, but product designers and pug-dog breeders also put it to good use. And since I try to acknowledge good design, Helle deserves my 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JjYoG6jgpnFD9Kyq_Nu9NtmL8K8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JjYoG6jgpnFD9Kyq_Nu9NtmL8K8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JjYoG6jgpnFD9Kyq_Nu9NtmL8K8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/JjYoG6jgpnFD9Kyq_Nu9NtmL8K8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/w0eJIEFZNis" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/helle-viking.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUADQH88cSp7ImA9WhRQFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-23868832377435650</id><published>2011-12-09T10:15:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-09T10:16:11.179-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-09T10:16:11.179-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="4" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="computer" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="First Impressions" /><title>One Weekend with the Epson 3880</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/23868832377435650/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/epson-3880.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/23868832377435650?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/23868832377435650?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/5kkQAvuepDs/epson-3880.html" title="One Weekend with the Epson 3880" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  2 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    How interesting can setting up a printer be?

The Long Version: There's not a lot that I can add to the existing reviews of the Epson Stylus Pro 3880; over the past two years it's been in solid use by people who are better printmakers than I'll ever be. All I can really report on is the experience of upgrading to it. After all, as my 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QiEEk23AMcda-gxJ2AOrlmRvNzM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QiEEk23AMcda-gxJ2AOrlmRvNzM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QiEEk23AMcda-gxJ2AOrlmRvNzM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QiEEk23AMcda-gxJ2AOrlmRvNzM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/5kkQAvuepDs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/epson-3880.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcFQHY6fyp7ImA9WhRQEEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-6630332880413241581</id><published>2011-12-04T20:46:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-04T20:53:31.817-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-04T20:53:31.817-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="colour" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="5" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="computer" /><title>X-rite ColorMunki Display</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/6630332880413241581/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/x-rite-colormunki-display.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6630332880413241581?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/6630332880413241581?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/Vi_7zocs2yY/x-rite-colormunki-display.html" title="X-rite ColorMunki Display" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    It's better than the Huey…

The Long Version: It's been three years since I reviewed the Pantone Huey, and boy does that ever make me feel old. The Huey was a seriously first-generation device, while the X-rite Colormunki Display – a bad combination of words if I ever heard one – is so much more capable that there's absolutely no 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8hoHeEFscIDmU41EHLeF0P-COx0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8hoHeEFscIDmU41EHLeF0P-COx0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8hoHeEFscIDmU41EHLeF0P-COx0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/8hoHeEFscIDmU41EHLeF0P-COx0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/Vi_7zocs2yY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/x-rite-colormunki-display.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAFSHY5fSp7ImA9WhRRGEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-4140697704511297004</id><published>2011-12-02T23:46:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2011-12-02T23:48:39.825-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-02T23:48:39.825-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="5" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="plastics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="camera accessories" /><title>Generic Lens Caps</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/4140697704511297004/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/generic-lens-caps.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4140697704511297004?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/4140697704511297004?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/2jaQZQH7YHI/generic-lens-caps.html" title="Generic Lens Caps" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Name-brand pharmaceuticals are next.

The Long Version:  After my Zeiss C-Sonnar review I promised Bill that I'd try to avoid inspirational photography products for a while. Reviewing lens caps seems to fit the requirement, since they're one of those little usability design things that can either go unnoticed or be an ongoing irritation
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g8ouKnWd6-pxlpXvkLsuQ_Viqi4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g8ouKnWd6-pxlpXvkLsuQ_Viqi4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g8ouKnWd6-pxlpXvkLsuQ_Viqi4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/g8ouKnWd6-pxlpXvkLsuQ_Viqi4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/2jaQZQH7YHI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/12/generic-lens-caps.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0UMR38-fSp7ImA9WhRRFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-703337043108372578</id><published>2011-11-27T20:48:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2011-11-27T22:01:26.155-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-11-27T22:01:26.155-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lens" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="photography" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="4" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Nikon" /><title>Nikon 35mm f/2 AF-D</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/703337043108372578/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/11/nikkor-352d.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/703337043108372578?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/703337043108372578?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/3UnUwpwsoYc/nikkor-352d.html" title="Nikon 35mm f/2 AF-D" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  2 out of 5 
Execution:  2 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    No, I didn't inadvertently use one photo twice.

The Long Version: I've never really liked the Nikkor 35/2 AF-D lens, but I bought it anyway. Simply for the sake of versatility I wanted something wider than my 50/1.8D for my F-mount cameras. As always with SLR lenses, price ramps up very quickly as the focal length and apertures 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b_mcJhugVZ5tLgM0MTnqGvj16UI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b_mcJhugVZ5tLgM0MTnqGvj16UI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b_mcJhugVZ5tLgM0MTnqGvj16UI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b_mcJhugVZ5tLgM0MTnqGvj16UI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/3UnUwpwsoYc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/11/nikkor-352d.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C08DRn0zeyp7ImA9WhRREUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-9123854403685897137</id><published>2011-11-24T00:16:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2011-11-24T00:17:57.383-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-11-24T00:17:57.383-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPhone" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="toys" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="7" /><title>Rain Alarm (Extended) for iPhone</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/9123854403685897137/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/11/rain-alarm.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/9123854403685897137?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/9123854403685897137?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/sKunH5iN0SM/rain-alarm.html" title="Rain Alarm (Extended) for iPhone" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  4 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Chicken Little eat your heart out.

The Long Version: I enjoy planning. I like to know what to expect, and I like to have some idea what to do if that's not what happens. One manifestation of this is that I really want to know if it's likely to rain.

Rain Alarm is a useful little application for iOS. It taps into publicly-available 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfzc01nz8Ey1ynHRvuFV4wgnLIA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfzc01nz8Ey1ynHRvuFV4wgnLIA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfzc01nz8Ey1ynHRvuFV4wgnLIA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bfzc01nz8Ey1ynHRvuFV4wgnLIA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/sKunH5iN0SM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/11/rain-alarm.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck8DSHszfSp7ImA9WhRSF0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-754037359690107642.post-868755206819672948</id><published>2011-11-19T16:50:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2011-11-19T17:14:39.585-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-11-19T17:14:39.585-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="8" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Matthew" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="games" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="computer" /><title>RoboSport</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/feeds/868755206819672948/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/11/robosport.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/868755206819672948?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/754037359690107642/posts/default/868755206819672948?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thewsReviews/~3/63LFtWMq27g/robosport.html" title="RoboSport" /><author><name>Matthew Robertson</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04134787874718415563</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_PiPn1cq8DSI/S8z4d0zMaYI/AAAAAAAAAEo/zUd2jhA1wHA/S220/matthewpiers100130-_DSC0128-avatar.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">
Concept:  5 out of 5 
Execution:  3 out of 5 
Yeah, but:    Mario, schmario.

The Long Version: I don't usually review things that I haven't used for almost twenty years, but one of the lingering injustices of electronic gaming is that the 1991 Mac/PC/Amiga classic RoboSport has never been reissued for a modern platform.

I started to play Robosport on a friend's Mac SE, long before I had a 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rX5HcTftVLPkUe3SpIemGv-Nkgw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rX5HcTftVLPkUe3SpIemGv-Nkgw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rX5HcTftVLPkUe3SpIemGv-Nkgw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rX5HcTftVLPkUe3SpIemGv-Nkgw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thewsReviews/~4/63LFtWMq27g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://www.thewsreviews.com/2011/11/robosport.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

