<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>ThoughtsOnThinking</title>
    
    <link rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-232224</id>
    <updated>2009-07-28T22:54:31-07:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Thoughts about Thinking, Thinking Tools and Software... with occasional bonus Business Musings...</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/thoughtsonthinking/TOT" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
        <title>Healthcare Problem in a Nutshell</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/hbypT9ZmHpI/healthcare-problem-in-a-nutshell.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/07/healthcare-problem-in-a-nutshell.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-08-17T16:19:20-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341d134c53ef0115724448c6970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-28T22:54:31-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-29T09:04:47-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A brilliant summary by Jacob Pollack re: what drives healthcare costs, as a comment on a WSJ article about China's concerns about US debt: Healthcare costs in the U.S. are driven by the following: (1) Workers being given very extensive...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>A brilliant summary by Jacob Pollack re: what drives healthcare costs, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124878817147386753.html#articleTabs=comments#comment331658">as a comment</a> on a WSJ article about <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124878817147386753.html#articleTabs%3Darticle">China's concerns about US debt</a>:</p><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">Healthcare costs in the U.S. are driven by the following:<br /><br />(1)
Workers being given very extensive healthcare insurance that give them
easy access to all manner of healthcare at little marginal cost to
them. The richness of these benefits is boosted by exemption of these
benefits from tax.<br /><br />(2) Without a price inhibitor, lack of other
restriction to prevent overuse of the system, which naturally results
when the price of use is artificially low.<br /><br />Nationalized
healthcare systems suffer from problem #1 (since the marginal cost of
using the system is 0), but resolve it by putting in place restrictions
on overuse of system. Usually these take the form of some sort of panel
of experts which decides what care people can have and what care they
can't have and deliberate under investment in capital equipment which
means people have to line up and wait (for example, by buying only 2
MRI machines to service an entire city). This is the so-called
"rationing" which Americans fear.<br /><br />To stem increases in
healthcare cost, the U.S. must either put in rationing, like in other
national healthcare systems, to restrain overuse of the system (which
results from not exposing patients to prices) or it must scale back the
richness of the benefits afforded under insurance policies so that
average citizens have to pay out of pocket for a lot more of the care
they receive. The latter could be accomplished by shifting to insurance
which looks a lot more like true insurance and only insures
"catastrophic" care costs. Such policies would have high annual
deductibles, requiring people to bear most of the cost of their
ordinary day-to-day care. Although they would offer much less benefits,
such insurance would be far cheaper and by exposing people to the costs
of the services they use, they would not overuse the system (and
providers would be encouraged through competition to offer good prices
to attract clients). By accepting less expensive insurance, Americans
would receive higher salaries or other forms of compensation.
Healthcare for the true poor can be resolved through direct government
subsidies to provide basic insurance or provide direct services in
public clinics, or similar solutions. This latter approach would be a
more American free-market solution.<br /></div><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/hbypT9ZmHpI" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/07/healthcare-problem-in-a-nutshell.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Mass Delete Twitter Cleanup Utility - TweetDelete</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/dd5kgSx6Dnw/mass-delete-twitter-cleanup-utility-tweetdelete.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/mass-delete-twitter-cleanup-utility-tweetdelete.html" thr:count="7" thr:updated="2009-11-03T22:37:27-08:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-66133037</id>
        <published>2009-04-28T18:05:55-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-21T11:23:12-07:00</updated>
        <summary>If you are looking to clean up a clogged up Twitter account, like the people asking questions here and here, this utility might be just what you are looking for (make sure you note the deletion caveats mentioned in those...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>If you are looking to clean up a clogged up Twitter account, like the people asking questions <a href="http://getsatisfaction.com/twitter/topics/deleting_mass_messages">here</a> and <a href="http://getsatisfaction.com/twitter/topics/phished_800_updates_mass_delete_feature">here</a>, this utility might be just what you are looking for (make sure you note the deletion caveats mentioned in those links though):</p><p><strong>Announcing TweetDelete</strong>, the Twitter Mass Delete / Cleanup Utility that helps you mass-delete Outgoing Tweets, and Incoming and Outgoing DMs.</p><p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://thoughtsonthinking.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341d134c53ef01156f655596970c-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="TweetDelete" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d8341d134c53ef01156f655596970c " src="http://thoughtsonthinking.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341d134c53ef01156f655596970c-800wi" title="TweetDelete" /></a> </span></p><p>This is a very-much-beta version, and donationware.  Use the feedback form if you find any problems (which I'm sure there are plenty), and if it proves valuable to you, feel free to donate to the cause. </p><p>Download TweetDelete <a href="http://www.tuleriversoftware.com/downloads/updates/tweetdelete/tweetdelete.exe">here</a>. No install required -- just download and run. : )</p><br /><p>* * *</p><p>(Later Update: Having some issues with the update server; if you get in an endless loop of "checking for updates" clicking "Next" on the welcome tab, you can skip to the login section directly via the numbered tabs at the top.  Should be squared away tomorrow if it's still a problem).</p><br /><p>* * *</p><p>Update: New release (minor edits, modified expiration date) released today 07/20/2009.  Apologies to the folks who got caught by the expiration period.</p><br /><p>* * * </p><p>Update: 08/18/2009 Users have recently begun reporting "mo Messages found to to delete" as the result they are getting, and I now get the same result here. Looks like Twitter has changed their API, blocked this app in some way, or something along those lines.</p><p>Given the minimal support/contributions this app has received thus far, it's not high on my priority list, but I do plan to look into it eventually.  <strong>Currently this app appears to no longer work, due to changes in the Twitter service.</strong></p><p>* * * <strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>Update: 09/21/2009 A number of daring souls have tried the app in its current form anyway, and feedback comments (built into the app) seem to indicate positive result.  Your mileage may vary, but feel free to try it out, and let me know how it works for you. <br /></strong></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/dd5kgSx6Dnw" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/mass-delete-twitter-cleanup-utility-tweetdelete.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Non-Adaptation</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/aQK2IG4dXQg/nonadaptation-1.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/nonadaptation-1.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-65899041</id>
        <published>2009-04-23T08:55:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-23T08:55:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>"The strategy has also splintered the file sharing space into many, many different players, many of them way underground, unlike in the early days when there were a manageable number of players who could be worked with proactively." (...more...)</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><em>"The strategy has also splintered the file sharing space into many, many
different players, many of them way underground, unlike in the early
days when there were a manageable number of players who could be worked
with proactively."  (...<a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081219/0225073172.shtml">more</a>...)<br /></em></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/aQK2IG4dXQg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/nonadaptation-1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Time Perception</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/wzbYCJUZSLA/nonadaptation.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/nonadaptation.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-65898971</id>
        <published>2009-04-22T15:52:26-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-22T15:52:26-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Layers of Time: "Civilization is revving itself into a pathologically short attention span." * * * When Brian first moved to New York City he found that in New York here and now meant this room and this five minutes,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Layers of Time:</p><p><a href="http://thoughtsonthinking.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341d134c53ef0115703b7036970b-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Layers of Time - speed-layers-sm" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d8341d134c53ef0115703b7036970b " src="http://thoughtsonthinking.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341d134c53ef0115703b7036970b-800wi" title="Layers of Time - speed-layers-sm" /></a> </p><p>"Civilization is revving itself into a pathologically short attention span."</p><p>* * *</p><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;"><em><br />When Brian first moved to New York City he found that in New York <span class="italic">here</span> and <span class="italic">now</span> meant <span class="italic">this room</span> and <span class="italic">this five minutes</span>, as opposed to the larger <span class="italic">here</span> and longer <span class="italic">now</span>
that he was used to in England. We have since adopted the term as the
title of our foundation as we are trying to stretch out what people
consider as <span class="italic">now</span>.<br /><br /></em></div><p><a href="http://longnow.org/about/">The Long Now</a></p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/wzbYCJUZSLA" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/nonadaptation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bailout Nation</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/8Wi6dkJaYSo/bailout-nation.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/bailout-nation.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-64936053</id>
        <published>2009-04-01T06:55:58-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-01T06:55:58-07:00</updated>
        <summary>10.5 Trillion dollars allocated and counting, in case you lost track.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>10.5 Trillion dollars allocated and counting, in case you <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/storysupplement/bailout_scorecard/index.html">lost track</a>.  </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/8Wi6dkJaYSo" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/04/bailout-nation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>eBay Stock Devaluation, 101</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/a5Dkt2l0xSg/ebay-stock-devaluation-101.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/ebay-stock-devaluation-101.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-08-10T08:54:54-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-63269861</id>
        <published>2009-02-24T00:30:43-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-01T13:11:14-08:00</updated>
        <summary>Bingo: But in an attempt to give users a more consistent and professional experience—professional as in free shipping, 24-hour customer service and instant purchases—is eBay abandoning everything that made it work, everything that made it the world’s largest and best...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/e-commerce/will-ebay-survive-its-professionalization/">Bingo</a>:<em><br /></em></p><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><em>But in an attempt to give users a more consistent and professional
experience—professional as in free shipping, 24-hour customer service
and instant purchases—is eBay abandoning everything that made it work,
everything that made it the world’s largest and best garage sale?</em><em>  Sure, garage sales might be more efficient if they had self-checkout
and kiosks that listed all of the merchandise and networked POS units
ringing up orders while they update your POS card, but that’s not
likely what you went to a garage sale for.<br /><br /></em></div><p style="margin-left: 40px;"><em>This comment is not to
suggest that free shipping and 24-hour customer service are not good
services, but that understanding why customers come to you is much more
important. If eBay becomes just like Amazon, why would this be good
news for eBay fans?</em></p><p><a href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2008/05/gradual-but-increasing-ebay-seller-exodus.html">It's</a> <a href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2008/05/ebay-tremers.html">obvious</a> to the <a href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2008/08/ebay-must-be-smoking-crack-aka-the-amazonification-project-phase-2.html">point now</a>, that someone has even written a book about it.  <a href="http://www.buildaskill.com/blog/2009/01/04/analysts-downgrade-ebay-donahoe-plans-questioned/">Analysts are even finally catching on</a> to the real issues behind this:</p><p style="margin-left: 40px;">Oct 12, 2007: <strong>$39.90</strong> per share<br />Feb 23, 2009:<strong> $11.53</strong> per share</p><p><br />=========<br />Update: Four days later, eBay shares hit <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/123404-shares-of-ebay-hit-seven-year-low">their lowest price in seven years</a>.  </p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/a5Dkt2l0xSg" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/ebay-stock-devaluation-101.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Entrepreneurial DNA</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/BywMUP0WF2k/entrepreneurial-dna.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/entrepreneurial-dna.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-63245411</id>
        <published>2009-02-23T12:45:48-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-23T12:56:21-08:00</updated>
        <summary>I found this comment from Michael Olenick on this WSJ article (title: "So, You Want to Ben an Entrepreneur") funny, mostly true, and telling: If you should start your own business you've probably already tried a few times by now:...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I found this <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123498006564714189.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments" title="WSJ article comments">comment</a> from 
						 							 Michael Olenick on <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123498006564714189.html#articleTabs%3Darticle" title="&quot;So, You Want to Ben an Entrepreneur&quot; article">this WSJ article</a> (title: "So, You Want to Ben an Entrepreneur") funny, mostly true, and telling:</p><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><em>If you should start your own business you've probably already tried a
few times by now: you can't help yourself. People cut out to make
businesses do just that, and there's no stopping them. They sometimes
end up at larger organizations -- especially if a prior business was
acquired -- but there they'll naturally either fall into the new
business group or find they're a bad cultural fit. It's just one of
those things baked into people.<br /><br />I have two dogs, brother and
sister. One is a fanatical fetcher: she's not doing you a favor by
bringing the ball back, you're doing her a favor by throwing it. She'll
play fetch anywhere, anytime and for anybody -- if you woke her up in
the middle of the night to play fetch she'd be happy. The other has no
interest in fetching and just ignores all the fetch toys. Despite that
they're together constantly he just doesn't show any interest. <br /><br />Entrepreneurs
are basically the same way: you either have it or you don't. I remember
reading somewhere that Ben &amp; Jerry started something like seven
businesses before coming up with their ice-cream stores: that's the
spirit you'd need. If you don't, you may want to be careful investing
your life savings starting a business because you'll be competing with
those that do, and they're (we're) basically workaholic maniacs who
will blow through any obstacle the world -- or our competitors -- might
throw at us. And with that rant, I'm finished lunch and back to
coding/selling/bookkeeping/managing ... just after I take a moment to
empty my own trash bin.</em><br /><br /></div><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/BywMUP0WF2k" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/entrepreneurial-dna.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>The 2000-Year Advance Payment </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/pRIjFE_kr5M/the-2000-year-advance-payment-.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/the-2000-year-advance-payment-.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-02-14T13:10:01-08:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-62859447</id>
        <published>2009-02-14T12:07:32-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-14T12:20:05-08:00</updated>
        <summary>Let's just say, at this price tag, I sure hope it works: If nothing else, the plan is a striking return of big government. It also symbolizes continuing partisanship, despite Mr. Obama’s promise of new cooperation. No House Republican voted...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Let's just say, at this price tag, I sure hope it works:</p><p style="margin-left: 40px;"><strong>If nothing else, the plan is a striking return of big government.</strong> It
also symbolizes continuing partisanship, despite Mr. Obama’s promise of
new cooperation. No House Republican voted for the measure, and the
three in the Senate who did are viewed as renegades by their party’s
leadership.</p><p style="margin-left: 40px;">Whatever the result, future generations will get the bill. </p><div style="margin-left: 40px;">“<strong>This
is so much money that if someone had begun spending $1 million a day —
$1 million every day — when Christ was born,</strong>” said Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, “<strong>we would not yet be in 2009 to the full cost of this bill.</strong>”<br /><br /></div><p>(emphasis added)</p><p>...and this, from the  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/us/politics/14stimintro.ready.html">"smaller, faster" version of the bill</a>.</p><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/pRIjFE_kr5M" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/the-2000-year-advance-payment-.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Essentials Of "Economic Stimulus"</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/VmAZaVTB96E/essentials-of-economic-stimulus.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/essentials-of-economic-stimulus.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-62602871</id>
        <published>2009-02-09T12:15:31-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-09T12:15:31-08:00</updated>
        <summary>My basic economic/political belief is that the government is and will never be as efficient a means to "creating wealth" as private enterprise. I would even go so far as to say that "creating wealth" and "creating jobs" isn't even...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>My basic economic/political belief is that the government is and will never be as efficient a means to "creating wealth" as private enterprise.  I would even go so far as to say that "creating wealth" and "creating jobs" isn't even in the purview of what the government is here for.  It's here to provide services that can't or shouldn't be privatized (military and police being two good example), and to reasonably ensure that people "play by the rules" that are required for a healthy, functioning society.</p><p>That said, I"m skeptical at best, of the ability of government to "rescue" our economy, especially by bailing out capital markets which have gotten where they are primarily by behaving badly.</p><p>I'm no economist though, and as such, I appreciated the WSJ's nice summary (via an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123396623933859023.html">opinion piece</a>) of some of these dynamics here:<br /><em><br /></em></p><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><em> A dollar doled out in jobless benefits may well be spent by the
worker who receives it. That $1 of spending will count as economic
activity and add to GDP.</em></div>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;"><em>But that same dollar can't be conjured out of thin air. The
government has to take that dollar away from someone else -- either in
higher taxes, or by issuing new debt in the form of a bond. The person
who is taxed or buys the bond will have $1 less to spend. If the
beneficiary of that $1 spends it on something less productive than the
taxed American or the lender would have, then the net impact on growth
will be negative.</em></p><br /> <br /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/VmAZaVTB96E" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2009/02/essentials-of-economic-stimulus.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Internal Server Error</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~3/AXkrMImyB-c/internal-server-error.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2008/12/internal-server-error.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-01-23T11:05:55-08:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-60562028</id>
        <published>2008-12-29T10:42:11-08:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-29T10:42:11-08:00</updated>
        <summary>On those days when I'm struggling to get my brain in gear, I'm thinking maybe I could pretend I'm a web server and just wear this as a placard around my neck: Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>ThoughtsOnThinking</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>On those days when I'm struggling to get my brain in gear, I'm thinking maybe I could pretend I'm a web server and just wear this as a placard around my neck:</p><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br /></div><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><span style="font-size: 22px; font-family: Trebuchet MS;">Internal Server Error</span></div>
<p style="margin-left: 40px;">The server encountered an internal error or
misconfiguration and was unable to complete
your request.</p><br /><p><br />"Sorry, can't help you," and then just point to the sign...  ; )</p><br /><p /><xhtml:img xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/thoughtsonthinking/TOT/~4/AXkrMImyB-c" height="1" width="1" /></div></content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thoughtsonthinking.com/2008/12/internal-server-error.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
