<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Three:Twenty Interactive</title>
	
	<link>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/threetwenty" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>threetwenty</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>META Tags are Dead. Long Live META Tags!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/R-ztOaraBLk/meta-tags-are-dead-long-live-meta-tags.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/meta-tags-are-dead-long-live-meta-tags.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/meta-tags-are-dead-long-live-meta-tags.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Possibly the number one thing that will get you laughed out of search engine circles is claiming that META tags (specifically the Description and Keywords tags) are still important for ranking well.
Here are just a few examples:

Just yesterday Rand criticized horrible information in the Kansas City Star&#8217;s Steps to Build Web Traffic, including &#8220;You need [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly the number one thing that will get you laughed out of search engine circles is claiming that META tags (specifically the Description and Keywords tags) are still important for ranking well.</p>
<p>Here are just a few examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>Just yesterday <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blogdetail.php?ID=1588">Rand criticized</a> horrible information in the Kansas City Star&#8217;s <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/business/16217248.htm">Steps to Build Web Traffic</a>, including <i>&#8220;You need to have key words or meta tags on every page of the site. Meta tags are the key phrases that search engines look for.&#8221;</i></li>
<li>Tony at Xeal Inc. says that the META Description <i>&#8220;can actually be a detriment for the user.&#8221;</i></li>
<li>Heck, even <em>I&#8217;m</em> on record calling a search marketer &#8220;borderline criminal&#8221; who claimed in a proposal, among other things, that META tags are key to ranking well.</li>
</ul>
<p>However, I have now built a steady stream of evidence to the contrary &#8212; namely that the META Description <i>can</i> be vital to ranking well.</p>
<p>Hear me out.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;ve seen specifically is that Google leans heavily on the Description tag to determine if a page is unique or not.  If you have a site where the vast majority of pages all have the same Description, or no Description at all, you might encounter a couple of problems:</p>
<ol>
<li>The pages may not get indexed at all.</li>
<li>The pages may get indexed, but only in the Supplemental index.</li>
</ol>
<p>My evidence for this?</p>
<blockquote class="indent"><p>
<strong><a href="http://www.thecompanyofwomen.com/">WFG&#8217;s, The Company of Women</a></strong>: This site has seven pages.  Every page had the exact same Description and Keywords, and every page (except for the homepage) was in the Supplemental index.  We changed both METAs, and the pages came out of Supplemental within days.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.creditorweb.com/">CreditorWeb.com</a></strong>: Same situation here, but with <em>vastly</em> more pages, and virtually all of them were Supplemental.  When we changed the duplicate Descriptions to be unique to each page, however, the pages came right out.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.nursinghomes.com/">Nursing Homes.com</a></strong>: Similar situation here, but with a twist.  We launched thousands of new pages back in September and just like clockwork, Google began to crawl them all and add them to the index.  Flash forward a few months, however, and the crawling had stopped almost entirely and nothing but the homepage was indexed.  Turns out, only the homepage had a Description.  Adding a unique Description for every page has had the unique effect (so far) of restoring to the Supplemental index pages that Google crawled back in September.  Although it&#8217;s crawling thousands of pages a day, it&#8217;s still showing the old pages in Supplemental.  Waiting to see if all the pages now have Descriptions maybe?
</p></blockquote>
<p>So if you&#8217;re having problems getting into the full index, or if you just want to avoid problems in the future, <em>be sure</em> that all your pages have a unique Description.  It can be short, but just make sure it&#8217;s applicable and unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/meta-tags-are-dead-long-live-meta-tags.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/meta-tags-are-dead-long-live-meta-tags.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Emergiblog Makes FOXNews.com &#x201c;Best Blogs&#x201d; List</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/dhkRVrT5JlQ/emergiblog-makes-foxnewscom-best-blogs-list.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/emergiblog-makes-foxnewscom-best-blogs-list.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/emergiblog-makes-foxnewscom-best-blogs-list.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A big congratulations to Kim, whose blog, Emergiblog, was just named in FOXNews.com&#8217;s list of 10 Best Health Blogs.
Emergiblog is the world&#8217;s number one nursing blog and has been honored a number of times.  Although we help Kim manage it, the honors go 100% to her outstanding writing and wit.
Congratulations, Kim!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="clientlogo"><img src="/wp-content/themes/default/images/clients/emergiblog-s.gif" alt="Emergiblog" /></div>
<p>A big congratulations to Kim, whose blog, <a href="http://www.emergiblog.com/">Emergiblog</a>, was just named in <strong>FOXNews.com</strong>&#8217;s list of <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,234280,00.html">10 Best Health Blogs</a>.</p>
<p>Emergiblog is the world&#8217;s number one nursing blog and has been honored a number of times.  Although <a href="http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/clients/emergiblog/">we help Kim manage it</a>, the honors go 100% to her outstanding writing and wit.</p>
<p>Congratulations, Kim!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/emergiblog-makes-foxnewscom-best-blogs-list.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/12/emergiblog-makes-foxnewscom-best-blogs-list.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Low Clickthrough Rate is Bad, Right?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/STTBY87dM0k/a-low-clickthrough-rate-is-bad-right.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/a-low-clickthrough-rate-is-bad-right.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 16:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/a-low-clickthrough-rate-is-bad-right.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When managing your pay-per-click (PPC) advertising campaign, your goal is to get the highest clickthrough rate possible, right?
Not necessarily.
That&#8217;s usually your goal, but there are some instances where you actually don&#8217;t mind a low clickthrough rate (CTR).  Let&#8217;s take Nursing Jobs.org for example.
They have a section of their site dedicated to nursing jobs with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When managing your pay-per-click (PPC) advertising campaign, your goal is to get the highest clickthrough rate possible, right?</p>
<p>Not necessarily.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s usually your goal, but there are some instances where you actually don&#8217;t mind a low clickthrough rate (CTR).  Let&#8217;s take <a href="http://www.nursingjobs.org/">Nursing Jobs.org</a> for example.</p>
<p>They have a section of their site dedicated to <a href="http://www.nursingjobs.org/bonus/">nursing jobs with signing bonuses</a>, and they have some PPC advertising driving traffic to that page.  Currently, they only have a few jobs there, so the percentage of the general nursing population who would be interested in any of them is very small.</p>
<p>So, they <em>could</em> have a PPC ad that looks like this:</p>
<p style="margin:0 21px">
<b><a href="http://www.nursingjobs.org/bonus/">Nursing Jobs with Bonuses</a></b><br />
Find nursing jobs with signing bonuses<br />
at the web&#8217;s #1 site for nursing jobs!
</p>
<p>That one will definitely get a good CTR, but the vast majority of the clicks will be from nurses who won&#8217;t find anything they&#8217;re looking for &#8212; money down the drain.</p>
<p>Consider this alternative:</p>
<p style="margin:0 21px">
<b><a href="http://www.nursingjobs.org/bonus/">OR and ER RNs Needed</a></b><br />
$1,000 Signing Bonuses for RNs in<br />
Hartford, CT. Apply Online Today!
</p>
<p>The CTR for that one will really stink, <em>but</em> the ad tells those nurses exactly what to expect when they click through.  As a result, you&#8217;re going to get very few clicking through who won&#8217;t find a job applicable to them &#8212; you get way less clicks, but each click is way more valuable because you&#8217;ve prequalified them.</p>
<p>Having your visitors filter themselves before they every click on the ad is a great strategy because it not only saves you money, it also allows you to bid <em>much</em> higher per click.  Keep that in mind the next time you&#8217;re writing your creative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/a-low-clickthrough-rate-is-bad-right.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/a-low-clickthrough-rate-is-bad-right.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Announces New Clickriver PPC System</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/ErFd0UfNZoQ/amazon-announces-new-clickriver-ppc-system.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/amazon-announces-new-clickriver-ppc-system.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/amazon-announces-new-clickriver-ppc-system.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt over at full : 1511 points today to the unveiling of the new Clickriver PPC system by Amazon&#8217;s A9 subsidiary.  (That probably goes a long way toward explaining their recent announcement of a cutback in their search plans.)  The service will allow advertisers to place PPC ads directly on Amazon.com.
The program is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt over at <a href="http://www.full1511.com/">full : 1511</a> <a href="http://www.full1511.com/2006/11/03/amazon-uses-a9-to-unveil-a-new-ad-system/">points</a> today to the unveiling of the new Clickriver PPC system by Amazon&#8217;s A9 subsidiary.  (That probably goes a long way toward explaining their <a href="http://www.ineedhits.com/free-tools/blog/2006/10/amazon-a9-search-cutback.aspx">recent announcement</a> of a cutback in their search plans.)  The service will allow advertisers to place PPC ads directly on Amazon.com.</p>
<p>The program is in restricted beta right now, but they are <a href="http://www.clickriver.com/">accepting requests for invitations</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/amazon-announces-new-clickriver-ppc-system.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/amazon-announces-new-clickriver-ppc-system.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What Should You Pay for Search Marketing Services?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/r0c6aRe1a1k/what-should-you-pay-for-search-marketing-services.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/what-should-you-pay-for-search-marketing-services.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 13:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/what-should-you-pay-for-search-marketing-services.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand has a great post today on search marketing salary ranges.  If you&#8217;re looking to hire someone full-time, or if you&#8217;re only looking to contract someone temporarily, this is a great list.  In my experience both working as an employee and working independently, these numbers seem very accurate.
Rand&#8217;s SEOmoz blog is hands-down the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand has a great post today on <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blogdetail.php?ID=1510">search marketing salary ranges</a>.  If you&#8217;re looking to hire someone full-time, or if you&#8217;re only looking to contract someone temporarily, this is a great list.  In my experience both working as an employee and working independently, these numbers seem very accurate.</p>
<p>Rand&#8217;s <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog.php">SEOmoz blog</a> is hands-down the best search engine marketing blog that I&#8217;ve found.  No one else comes close.  I say that because he constantly details an absolutely unbelievable amount of behind-the-scenes details on how his company does what they do.  Many people wouldn&#8217;t <em>dream</em> of ever giving away even half of what he does.  Is it any wonder that SEOmoz has skyrocketed in popularity like it has?  <a href="http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/the-secret-to-great-rankings-karma.htm">Good karma</a> at work again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/what-should-you-pay-for-search-marketing-services.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/what-should-you-pay-for-search-marketing-services.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Link Building: Seven Great Steps</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/l8p_XtRRg1A/link-building-seven-great-steps.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/link-building-seven-great-steps.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/link-building-seven-great-steps.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Griffin has a great set of seven tips for successful link building on his Submitawebsite blog today.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Griffin has a great set of <a href="http://www.submitawebsite.com/blog/2006/11/always-get-new-links-agnl-_116248758442218687.html">seven tips for successful link building</a> on his <a href="http://www.submitawebsite.com/blog/">Submitawebsite blog</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/link-building-seven-great-steps.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/link-building-seven-great-steps.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Capturing the User&#x2019;s Email Address</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/n1n4_T0CPE4/capturing-the-users-email-address.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/capturing-the-users-email-address.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Growth Basics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/capturing-the-users-email-address.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite often on your site, you&#8217;ll want to capture the user&#8217;s email address.  With spam and phishing attempts increasing daily, though, that&#8217;s getting harder and harder.  People are just rightfully much more protective of their email address.
Strategies for loosening their grip abound, but I&#8217;ve never seen one better than this one.  I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite often on your site, you&#8217;ll want to capture the user&#8217;s email address.  With spam and phishing attempts increasing daily, though, that&#8217;s getting harder and harder.  People are just rightfully much more protective of their email address.</p>
<p>Strategies for loosening their grip abound, but I&#8217;ve never seen one better than <a href="http://www.premiumdomain.com/">this one</a>.  I instantly wanted to see they said some of my domains were worth, so I didn&#8217;t hesitate to enter them.  On the next page, though, they prompted me for my name and email address so that they could email the report.  That would seem perfectly legitimate to most people, and so I bet their conversion percentage is <em>well</em> over 50%.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the key: users will give up their contact information if they feel compelled enough.  You can do that by offering something of exceptional value, as most people advocate, but this way seems much more effective.  Just get creative as to how you can make it a reasonable step in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/capturing-the-users-email-address.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/11/capturing-the-users-email-address.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Secret to Great Rankings? Karma.</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/rTD6j45bKpY/the-secret-to-great-rankings-karma.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/the-secret-to-great-rankings-karma.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Running a Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/the-secret-to-great-rankings-karma.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want the secret to great rankings?  According to Steven Bradley, it&#8217;s karma. Not the spiritual “Law of Karma” central to Eastern Philosophy, but the Americanized version of karma practiced by Earl Hickey every Thursday night.
He&#8217;s right.  And not only does karma work great for getting better rankings, it also leads to more business. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want the secret to great rankings?  <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2006/10/seo-is-nothing-but-karma.html">According to Steven Bradley</a>, it&#8217;s karma. <em>Not the spiritual “Law of Karma” central to Eastern Philosophy, but the Americanized version of karma practiced by Earl Hickey every Thursday night.</em></p>
<p>He&#8217;s right.  And not only does karma work great for getting better rankings, it also leads to more business.  Be wary of any company who promises to increase your rankings or improve your site without telling you exactly what they&#8217;re doing.  Best case, they&#8217;re likely not somebody you want to be working with.  Worst case, they&#8217;re doing something underhanded that will cause your site to lose its rankings altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/the-secret-to-great-rankings-karma.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/the-secret-to-great-rankings-karma.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Who We&#x2019;re Recommending for Web Hosting These Days</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/WAaNSZcY5m0/who-were-recommending-for-web-hosting-these-days.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/who-were-recommending-for-web-hosting-these-days.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Running a Business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/who-were-recommending-for-web-hosting-these-days.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in March, I documented my frustrating search for a good web host.  I had tried GoDaddy, pair Networks, Media Temple, Yahoo and MidPhase, all to no avail.  Each had their good points but ultimately didn&#8217;t work for me for one reason or another.  (See that original post for more details.)
Well back [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in March, I documented <a href="http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/03/finding-a-good-web-host.htm">my frustrating search for a good web host</a>.  I had tried <a href="http://www.dpbolvw.net/click-1893521-10388358">GoDaddy</a>, <a href="http://www.pair.com/">pair Networks</a>, <a href="http://www.mediatemple.com/">Media Temple</a>, Yahoo and <a href="http://www.midphase.com/">MidPhase</a>, all to no avail.  Each had their good points but ultimately didn&#8217;t work for me for one reason or another.  (See that original post for more details.)<img src="http://www.ftjcfx.com/image-1893521-10388358" width="1" height="1" border="0"/></p>
<p><img src="http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/mosso_logo.png" alt="Mosso" class="floatright" style="margin:0 0 13px 13px" />Well back in July we switched over to a new hosting service called <a href="http://www.mosso.com/">Mosso</a> (an innovative &#8220;hosting system&#8221; from the guys at <a href="http://www.rackspace.com/">Rackspace</a>), and we would definitely recommend them.  As with any new service they have definitely had their bumps in the road, but for us the good definitely outweighs the bad.</p>
<p>The downside is that they only have a single product: $100/month for 80 GB of dsik space and 2,000 GB of bandwidth.  If you need that much, or you&#8217;re looking to be a reseller, then this a great deal.  Otherwise you might have to team up with someone.</p>
<p>The really cool thing for us is that we can run ASPs on a true Linux system.  As longtime Windows guys, that has made the switch to a Linux/Apache/MySQL/PHP setup very, very easy for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/who-were-recommending-for-web-hosting-these-days.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/who-were-recommending-for-web-hosting-these-days.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo&#x2019;s New &#x201c;Panama&#x201d; Release</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/threetwenty/~3/4bL7xlf_zTM/yahoos-new-panama-release.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/yahoos-new-panama-release.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 19:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shane</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Generating Traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/yahoos-new-panama-release.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned Wednesday in Google Pulls Away that Yahoo had a new version of their PPC program in the works.  Well, first impressions are starting to creep out, and while it sounds impressive, I can&#8217;t get past the fact that Panama just sounds like AdWords circa 2003.  I mean look at this list [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned Wednesday in <i><a href="http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/google-pulls-away.htm">Google Pulls Away</a></i> that Yahoo had a new version of their PPC program in the works.  Well, <a href="http://www.jensense.com/archives/2006/10/attending_the_y.html">first</a> <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/blog/archives/2006/10/resident_ppc_pr.html">impressions</a> are starting to creep out, and while it sounds impressive, I can&#8217;t get past the fact that Panama just sounds like AdWords circa 2003.  I mean look at this list of &#8220;new features&#8221; (as compiled by Nick Guastella of <a href="http://www.bruceclay.com/">Bruce Clay, Inc.</a>):</p>
<ol>
<li>Faster ad approvals: Ads will go live within minutes instead of the old 3-5 day turnaround. In fact, we&#8217;ve already noticed faster ad approvals even without being migrated to the new system. Multiple A/B ad testing will also now be available to determine best performance.</li>
<li>Geo-Targeting: Previously advertisers had to use either local search or geo-specific search terms. Under the new system advertisers will be able to do this in one account. The new geo-targeting will allow distribution down to specific cities. They now provide a map of the area which then shows a highlighted radius of coverage based on advertiser’s choices.</li>
<li>Ad Groups: Keywords in Ad groups can now use multiple ads where as before a keyword had to be linked to just one ad and advertisers had to wait up to 5 days to change.</li>
<li>Keyword Insertion feature: Keywords will be able to be automatically inserted into titles and descriptions improving focus of ads and click through rates, and will also save advertisers time having to write specific ads including each keyword. Though that doesn&#8217;t mean you can slack off on writing good ad copy.</li>
<li>Quality Index: Similar to the old Google quality index made up of click through rate, keywords related to ad copy, display URL, landing page and other factors.</li>
</ol>
<p>Can you spot the one that Google <em>didn&#8217;t</em> have in 2003?</p>
<p>If you said #2, you&#8217;re right.  It&#8217;s only been out since the beginning of 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/yahoos-new-panama-release.htm/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.threetwentyinteractive.com/2006/10/yahoos-new-panama-release.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
