Canadians trying to recover from the post-G20 blur have yet another worry on the horizon: the aftershock of the G20 leaders’ austerity plan.

Two years ago this fall, the G20 nations responded to the global financial meltdown with aggressive monetary stimulus and massive bank bailouts to quarantine the contagion; and a $5 trillion fiscal stimulus program to stem the economic free fall. Without this unprecedented collective action, the world would have plunged into a 1930s-style depression.

Even as the European debt crisis — the latest fault line in the financial crisis — continues to send shock waves through the global markets, powerful forces are aligning to flick the world back into its previous ideological default position.

Now that the depression bullet has supposedly been dodged, the G20 political leaders, despite paying lip service to the still fragile and uneven state of global economic recovery, are planning to rapidly eliminate their deficits — the very mistake governments made during the 1930s.

Contagion (a medical term referring to a highly transmittable disease) has become the metaphor for a world of highly interconnected and deregulated financial markets; where a financial crisis in one country quickly spreads to others infecting their real economies as well.

Collateral damage is what happens when contagion hits people who live and work in the real economy, and who pay the price of the financial market excess that caused the contagion.

Global unemployment has already risen by 34 million since the crisis began, with millions more workers unable to find regular employment.

Prodded by the financial markets’ whipping up of deficit hysteria, a new government consensus in favour of fiscal austerity is emerging. It is led in Europe by Germany and the U.K., and in North America by the Harper government. It contends that only swift and deep spending cuts will restore confidence among the bond market vigilantes.

This, its proponents argue, is necessary to prompt the private sector to spring into action, invest and spur the recovery. Although there is not a shred of evidence that this tough love approach will work, one thing is certain: It will deepen the suffering of the unemployed.

Draconian austerity measures are now being imposed in Europe and elsewhere: pension rollbacks and wage cuts for public servants, savage spending cuts. Millions are losing their jobs, their homes and their businesses.

These measures are guaranteed to deepen and prolong recession and, paradoxically, weaken governments’ ability to manage their debt.

The wealthy will suffer no similar fate. On the contrary, the latest Merrill Lynch world wealth report found that ranks of millionaires climbed 17 per cent in 2009 while their collective wealth surged 19 per cent to $39 trillion.

Stephen Harper boasted about getting G20 countries to agree to cut their deficits by one-half by 2013. If they follow through, the risk of backslide into global recession will grow. (Nothing about job creation targets in the summit communique.)

Harper also lobbied hard to kill an international bank tax that would help rein in the speculators that put the global economy in crisis in the first place, and provide a major new source of revenue for governments.

At home, egged on by business economists and its own ideological instincts, the Harper government is preparing to shrink its own moderate deficit and debt via major public services cuts, layoffs and asset sell-offs, even as more than 2 million Canadian workers (11.5 per cent) remain unemployed or underemployed.

The news of recent days makes the G20 decision all the more troubling. The U.S. economy is faltering, unable to create enough jobs as record numbers drop out of the workforce. Europe is struggling. The Japanese economy is anemic. Even China’s economy is showing signs of slowing. There is growing talk a double dip global recession.

In Canada, the economy stalled in April and today Statistics Canada will tell us how this has affected unemployment.

So, here and abroad the poor and the middle class pay the price of deficit reduction via social program cuts and continued high unemployment. They are collateral damage while the perpetrators get back to business as usual.

The destructive free market mindset — the real source of the contagion here — was not (as it should have been) extinguished months ago; and proponents such as Harper and other G20 leaders have worked hard to put it back on the front burner.

Clearly, they have not yet learned the lesson of the 2008 collapse. Until they do, the cycle of contagion and crisis will recur. And people — the collateral damage in this dangerous high stakes game — will continue to pay a heavy price.

Bruce Campbell is Executive Director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.

I’ve often thought about public attitudes towards government and politics, and how recent events in Ottawa have further brought the public faith of government into disrepute.
It strikes me this government, more than most others, has treated our democratic and parliamentary institutions with disrespect, if not outright contempt.
I’m not surprised, because they showed the same contempt for government before they were elected.
In a word, Harper’s government treats government like it is the problem. In other words, he’s his own worst enemy.
It was an article of faith of both the Reform party and the hard-right Conservatives that government is bad, small government is not quite as bad, and democracy is best fine-tuned with a sledgehammer.
Not to sound like a Grade 9 civics class, but since the 1600s, Parliament has been the government.
Not the prime minister, not his cabinet, not his political party — Parliament, which includes Opposition MPs.
When allowed to function, it guarantees responsibility, accountability and transparency.

Read the full article here….

The pattern is set: someone says something critical about the policies of Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government and the Conservative mud-slinging machine goes into attack mode. On the receiving end have been Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff (“unCanadian”), NDP Leader Jack Layton (“Taliban Jack”), Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty (“the small man of Confederation”), whistle-blowing diplomat Richard Colvin (“hearsay”), and any critics of Israeli policies (“anti-Semites”).

Now added to the list is Ed Clark, CEO of TD Bank and one of Canada’s pre-eminent business leaders.

Read the full article here

Harper said the move would bring Iran “considerably closer” to possessing weapons-grade material.
Utter nonsense! 20% enriched uranium isn’t even close to weapons grade.

“It is time for Iran to end its defiance of the international community,

What ‘defiance’? They are perfectly within their legal rights.

suspend its enrichment activity and take immediate steps toward transparency and compliance

Iran has been in full compliance with the IAEA

by halting the construction of new enrichment sites,
and fully co-operating with the International Atomic Energy Agency,”
Iran have co-operated, consistently with the IAEA knowing full well that many of the so-called inspectors in the IAEA’s teams were CIA agents

Iran has agreed to ship out it’s 3% to Russia or France, IF, they can be guaranteed that the upgraded material will be returned to them.
Feb 9, 2010 The Star

Harper said in a statement.
…
“Canada will continue to work with our allies to find strong and viable solutions, including sanctions, to hold Iran to account,…”

Now he’s threatening Iran! Hasn’t he heard of diplomacy???

Remember when Harper warned us about Saddam, and said that attacking Iraq was necessary … ?

“These allies did not seek a military conflict today any more than they sought it 12 years ago. The world has tried other means for years but to no avail. We cannot walk away from the threat that Iraq’s continued possession of weapons of mass destruction constitutes to its region and to the wider world.” Stephen Harper, 2003
He was wrong then, and he’s wrong now

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/02/10/iran-stephen-harper-uranium-nuclear.html#socialcomments#ixzz0fLgQcJBu

From a March 2003 speech by Harper

The full report of Harpers statements are here

Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s government should do its best over the coming year (2007) to dig up embarrassing information on the former Liberal administration and portray it as corrupt, a prominent Republican pollster counselled an influential group of Conservatives Saturday.

By CanWest News ServiceMay 7, 2006

…Frank Luntz described the Conservatives as allies of the Republicans…

…

Full article as published online in 2006 click here

05/02/2008

So who is Frank Luntz?  Here’s one description:

Ever wonder where Steve and his merry band of **** get some of their creepier ideas and methods? Just how could a Canadian political party sound and act so downright American, besides being one third of the Tres Diablos and learning at the knee of the least popular and possibly most reviled president in modern US history? Enter Frank Luntz, the communications equivalent of an arms dealer. Link

Luntz has earned the reputation of a man who not only reads the political tea leaves, but transforms that reading into a winning message. “Frank Luntz is the Republican Party’s undisputed master of right-wing propaganda, conservative spin-meistering, political-deception, diversion, redirection and focusing the imagination of an unsuspecting audience in ways that bring about specific outcomes or foster public support for anti-environmental, anti-democratic or pro-business positions,” Scott Silver, the executive director of the Bend, Oregon-based environmental group, Wild Wilderness, explained in a recent email.

How does Frank Luntz fit into the Canadian Conservative scene? For starters, he grew a playoffs beard. He’s been connected with Preston Manning from back in the day. Manning introduced Luntz to the “low-key, yet influential Conservative group” the Civitas Society (of whom Harper’s chief of staff Ian Brodie is a director and Tom Flanagan is a founder)

The Civitas Society is a low-key, yet influential Conservative group with close ties to Harper. In its last annual report filed with the government, Harper’s chief of staff Ian Brodie is listed as a director and Brodie attended the group’s conference Saturday. Tom Flanagan, a longtime friend of Harper’s and his campaign manager for the leadership, is a founder of the group and was also there.

Canada has now had 4 years of a minority government under Steven Harper.  Looking back (not so far) is there any evidence that Harper has followed the advice of the American spin-master?

The consistent use of attack ads.
The misuse of 10%ers targeting specific groups.
“Talking points” for all MP’s directly from the PMO.
Attack, discredit (regardless of truth) and remove, if possible, dissenting voices.
Attack the messenger – do not address the issue.
Accuse opposition of being ‘unpatriotic’, not supporting ‘the troops’.
etc….

Is this really what Canada is all about? Is this really what Canadians want in the way of a Federal Government?  For the love of Canada, the answer must be NO!

The issue is NOT about using the parliamentary tool to prorogue, but rather how and why it has been used by the Federal Government twice in the past 13 months.

Take a look at the conversation, click here

BTW, do you know where your MP is today?

Ottawa Sun, 10 February, 2010

OTTAWA – A warning letter to all federal cabinet ministers from the Prime Minister’s Office has produced a welcome moment of levity at a time when the national capital clown chamber is closed for prorogies.

The dire memo, that has left politicians and bureaucrats rolling in the aisles, reminds all ministerial staff to respect the country’s access to information laws.

Specifically, the missive from the PM’s chief of staff, Guy Giorno, warns that processing requests for government documents and other information is not the play-toy of politicians or their staffers.

Coming from the office of a secrecy-obsessed prime minister heading a government that has gagged its own ministers, censors anything that looks good in black, and has so far caused two federal information commissioners to leave their jobs in disgust — well, you can see why the Hill is alive with the sound of hilarity.

…

When the Conservatives first came to office in 2006, then information commissioner John Reid sounded the alarm bells at what he called retrograde steps towards secrecy — and was promptly run out of town.

His successor, Robert Marleau, recommended 12 fundamental changes needed to strengthen the access-to-information laws, and quit after his advice was ignored.

Finally last fall, Justice Minister Rob Nicholson clarified the Conservatives’ commitment to openness and accountability.

The government, he said, really isn’t the least bit interested in reforming federal information laws.

…

Click here to read the full article

OTTAWA—The tentative Buy American deal fails to gain a meaningful exemption for Canadian suppliers from provisions in the U.S. stimulus package while permanently curtailing provincial and municipal procurement sovereignty, says a new analysis of the deal from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA).

“The agreement is highly unbalanced and provides significantly better access for U.S. suppliers to the Canadian procurement market than for Canadian suppliers to U.S. stimulus projects,” says senior CCPA trade researcher Scott Sinclair.

According to the analysis, Canadian suppliers have a brief opportunity to compete for an estimated $4 to 5 billion US of federally funded stimulus projects, representing less than 2% of the approximately $275 billion US of procurement funded under the Recovery Act. In return, Canada has guaranteed U.S. suppliers access to a range of provincial and municipal infrastructure spending projects until September 2011, estimated to be valued at more than $25 billion Cdn.

“Most significantly, Canada has bowed to U.S. pressure to permanently bind purchasing by Canadian provincial and municipal governments under the WTO agreement on Government Procurement,” says Sinclair. “This proposed deal will prevent Canadian provincial and municipal governments from preferring local goods or suppliers while leaving Buy American policies almost fully intact.”

“The Harper government has taken advantage of the economic crisis to justify what it has wanted for a long time—more private access to public sector resources and further restrictions on the ability of all levels of governments in Canada to negotiate local benefits when the procure goods and services.”

February 4, 2010

The Hon. Rob Nicholson, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Justice

Dear Minister Nicholson,

I am writing concerning several statements made by you on Friday, January 29 when defending Prime Minister Harper’s appointment of an additional five Conservative Senators. In the past 12 months, Prime Minister Harper has made an unprecedented 32 appointments to the Senate – the most Senate appointments made by any Canadian Prime Minister in a 12-month period since Confederation.

I was puzzled to read press reports in which you defended the latest Senate appointments as necessary to allow your Government “to move forward on [y]our tackling-crime agenda.” You accused the Liberal opposition of having “obstructed that agenda in the Senate.” According to a transcript of your press conference, you said:

“The Ignatieff Liberals have abused their majority in the Senate by obstructing law and order bills that are urgently needed and strongly supported by Canadians.”

I can only assume that you have been misinformed as to the progress of anti-crime legislation. In fact, as I am sure your Cabinet colleague, Senator Marjory LeBreton, would tell you, the overwhelming majority of your Government’s anti-crime bills had not even reached the Senate when Prime Minister Stephen Harper chose to prorogue Parliament. Indeed, an honest examination of the record compels one to acknowledge that the greatest delays to implementation of your justice agenda have resulted from your own Government’s actions – sitting on bills and not bringing them forward for debate, delaying bringing legislation into force, and ultimately, of course, proroguing Parliament. That action alone caused some 18 of your justice-related bills to die on the Order Paper.

As a Canadian Press report described, “Indeed, [Prime Minister] Harper himself has done far more to delay his own crime legislation, by proroguing Parliament and other stalling tactics, than Liberal senators have ever done.”

Your Government introduced 19 justice-related bills in the House of Commons. Of these, 14 were still in the House of Commons at prorogation. Of the five justice bills that passed the House of Commons and came to the Senate:

two passed the Senate without amendment;

one (the so-called Serious Time for the Most Serious Crime bill) was tabled by your Government in November in the Senate but not brought forward for further action after that;

one was passed with four amendments and returned to the House of Commons which did not deal with it before Parliament was prorogued; and

one was being studied in committee when Parliament was prorogued and all committee work shut down.

There were a further two justice bills that your Government chose to initiate in the Senate. One was passed by the Senate after 14 days, sent to the House of Commons, passed and given Royal Assent. The other was tabled in the Senate on April 1, but has not been brought forward by your Government for any further action since then.

In terms of the status of the 14 law-and-order bills in the House of Commons, that had not yet reached the Senate when Parliament was prorogued:

Four of these bills have been sitting in the House of Commons at first reading, three in that state since October, and one since November – your Government chose not to bring any of these bills forward for second reading debate.

Another bill, Bill C-19, was tabled in the House of Commons by your Government in March, 2009, brought forward for two days of second reading debate in June, and not brought forward for any further action since then.

Similarly, Bill C-35 was tabled in June, brought forward for one day of second reading debate in October, and no further action taken since then.

Seven justice-related bills were being studied in Committee in the House of Commons as of prorogation. That work, of course, was required to stop immediately upon prorogation.

One bill – Bill C-34, the Protecting Victims from Sex Offenders bill – got as far as to be reported back from the House of Commons Committee on December 7, before dying on the Order Paper with the Government’s prorogation of Parliament.

I fail to understand how this factual record could lead you to say, as you did in your press conference that, “the record also shows that the Liberals are soft on crime” or that the Liberals in the Senate “obstructed” law and order bills. In fact, as I am sure you will now recognize, it is your Government that has failed to move forward a number of your own anti-crime bills. And, of course, by choosing to prorogue Parliament, Prime Minister Harper chose to let 18 of his Government’s 21 “tough-on-crime” bills die on the Order Paper. Comparing the numbers, Canadians would have to conclude that it is the Harper Conservatives who have chosen to obstruct law and order bills – while shamelessly trying to smear the Liberals and the Senate with the blame.

It is difficult to take a law-and-order agenda seriously when it is argued with so little respect for facts. Justice above all depends upon truth. As our country’s Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of Canada, your first allegiance must always be to the truth, far beyond any political or partisan gamesmanship. Our system of justice depends upon it. How can Canadians have any confidence in their justice system, if the person responsible for that system – the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada – is prepared to play fast and loose with the truth?

In your press conference, you pointed to three bills as evidence of Liberal Senators’ supposed “obstruction” of your Government’s agenda: Bills C-15, C-25 and C-26.

Bill C-15 was passed by the Senate with four amendments. These amendments represented our advice to the House of Commons, reflecting what we heard and concluded after listening to testimony from Canadians about the bill. That is our job as members of the second legislative House of Canada’s Parliament. We fully expected to hear back from the House of Commons with that House’s considered response to our advice. Unfortunately, that was not to be: instead, Prime Minister Harper chose to prorogue Parliament. The Senate’s work – done in the best tradition of Canadian parliamentary democracy – was lost.

While we may disagree as to whether the Senate’s amendments improved the bill (as I would say) or weakened it (as you would say) what cannot be truthfully said is that the Senate either delayed or obstructed the passage of the bill.

What “killed” the bill in the end, was not the Senate but the Prime Minister in shutting down Parliament before the House of Commons had a chance to consider the amendments proposed by the Senate.

I was particularly surprised that you referred to Bill C-25 during your press conference. That bill, which dealt with limiting credit for time spent in pre-sentencing custody, passed the Senate without any amendments on October 21, 2009, yet as of this writing, according to the Library of Parliament and the Privy Council Office, the bill has still not been brought into force by your Government – more than three months later. One is left to wonder whether you simply forgot to bring it into force? Or was the bill more about the appearance of being “tough on crime” than actually taking action? Certainly we now know that bill was not as urgent a priority for the Harper Government as was initially represented.

Finally, Bill C-26 was being studied by the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee when Parliament prorogued. As of prorogation, that bill had been in the Senate for 38 days. By comparison, the bill spent 42 days in the House of Commons. Committee study of proposed legislation is what many observers say is among the best work of the Senate. I am sure you want Canada’s criminal legislation to be the best and most effective it can be, and would agree that the proposed changes to the Criminal Code regarding auto theft require careful study consistent with our parliamentary system. Unfortunately, that work had to cease because of prorogation.

As Minister of Justice, and as a personal proponent of a strong law-and-order agenda, you have a duty, which I am sure you recognize, to uphold the truth and not mislead Canadians. Accordingly, I am confident that you will wish to quickly correct the record, and agree that the Liberal opposition in the Senate has not in fact “obstructed” your Government’s anti-crime agenda. To the contrary, the greatest delays to the implementation of your agenda have been due to your own Government’s actions in failing to bring bills forward for debate, dragging your feet in bringing legislation into force, and most significantly, proroguing Parliament.

I look forward to your clarification of these issues for Canadians.

Yours very truly,

James S. Cowan

Cc: The Right Honourable Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada
Cc: The Honourable Marjory LeBreton, Leader of the Government in the Senate

Source: David Akin, On The Hill

OPINION

Harper’s communications strategy and some principles of propaganda

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is a ‘control freak,’ who prides himself on being a top-flight political strategist, and central to his strategy is tight control over his government’s messages. But let the pundits wail, thrash about, and pontificate.  They are irrelevant to the PM’s strategy.

By W. T. Stanbury

On Nov. 16, The Hill Times published a feature column on the effectiveness of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s “iron message control.”  The column noted that the PM “has become legend for the iron control he exerts not only over the messages his government sends out over the heads of the Parliamentary Press Gallery, but also the messages his staff and MPs project.”  Harper has sought “to manage the government information flow to the media as well as the public appearances and statements of his own MPs and Cabinet ministers.”  Critics have said that “the wall of selective silence and control that shrouds the entire government undermines the free flow of information citizens could normally expect in a western democracy.”

Continued here at Google docs

– Encourage Conservative MPs to spend as much as possible on the “ten percenters” mailed at taxpayers’ expense to persons outside the MP’s constituency.  “Le Devoir found that MPs with the minority Conservatives spent $6.3-million on the mailers, while opposition MPs spent $3.8-million,” (The Globe and Mail, Nov. 16, 2009).

10.1 million.  Could have been a big help to the depleted unemployment insurance fund.