<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Finn Porter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://finnporter.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://finnporter.com</link>
	<description>Easily amused, hard to impress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Getting back time</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/getting-back-time/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/getting-back-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finnporter.com/?p=531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Time is one of our most precious resources and yet we don&#8217;t treat it like that. We are stressed, we don&#8217;t have enough time, time is running away from us, all we want is a little more time. Just a tiny bit, so we can sit down and read a few pages but, sadly, we ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time is one of our most precious resources and yet we don&#8217;t treat it like that. We are stressed, we don&#8217;t have enough time, time is running away from us, all we want is a little more time. Just a tiny bit, so we can sit down and read a few pages but, sadly, we can&#8217;t.<br />
Having no time for one&#8217;s own physical and mental health or one&#8217;s family and friends has become a sign of success. We celebrate those that work hard to achieve a heart attack at 31 and those who wouldn&#8217;t recognise their kids because they have grown so much since the last time they spent time with them.</p>
<p>Okay, okay, that&#8217;s a bit overdramatic but, if we&#8217;re honest, it&#8217;s not so far off. The prestige of stress is so high, it&#8217;s become a currency.<br />
So what do we do to get back the time we seem to lose so fast? We build things that automate and outsource our tasks, to free up more time. But for what exactly? More work.</p>
<p>Looking at it from an evolutional point of view it makes sense. Humans are such a successful species because we adapt, improve and get better. It&#8217;s basically against our nature to scale back and accept the status quo as good enough. We look for solutions that take us further and help us overcome our shortcomings. Historically, we had butlers and other staff that took care of things for us, now we have iPhones that we treat like people but in the end they&#8217;re all the same thing: Time savers. If we could save time like money we&#8217;d all be millionaires.</p>
<p>There are tons of productivity tools out there that will do things for us, so we don&#8217;t have to.<br />
But let&#8217;s have a closer look at those so-called time savers. I&#8217;m a great fan of them. I have lots of help to speed up my life. It starts with my documents auto-saving (who still remembers automatically pressing Ctrl+S every ten seconds) and ends with Hazel automatically sorting my automatically uploaded photos automatically.<br />
Wow, we save so much time but if we save so much of it, why do we never seem to have enough?</p>
<p>We have invented all sorts of things to become faster and, thus, saving time. We have succeeded in finding a solution for our time problem but we fail miserably when it comes to celebrating that success.<br />
Instead of enjoying a four day work week, we still work as much as the yuppies in the 80ies. We have become so much faster at our tasks that we should be done with everything we have to do by Wednesday evening. In an ideal world, we would earn the same, have the same workload, but do it in less time and then go home to enjoy the rest of the week with our family and taking care of ourselves. A reward for being so clever to invent productivity tools.</p>
<p>Instead, we work three jobs, earn less and have no time for what is actually important in life.<br />
All those productivity tools that I love so much only work if we stop using them to shift around time and start using them to spend our time better.</p>
<p>So next time you notice that you have saved 30 minutes by having photoshop do all the batch processing of your photos, use those 30 minutes to sit down and read a few pages. We have to start demanding back our time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/feb/01/top-five-regrets-of-the-dying" target="_blank">Guardian article on the regrets of the dying</a><br />
<a href="headspace.com" target="_blank">Headspace</a><br />
<a href="https://www.google.com/maps/search/nearest+park/" target="_blank">Take a walk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/getting-back-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Gender Gap at the World Economic Forum 2015</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/wef15/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/wef15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#WEF15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Davos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender parity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finnporter.com/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Estimated reading time: </p> <p>In a recent <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jan/24/davos-2015-women-female-diversity-gender-equality-boards" target="_blank">Guardian article</a> I read that this year at the World Economic Forum in Davos female participation rose from a devastating 15% to intensely unacceptable 17%. Please keep in mind this year&#8217;s focus was on equality and integration.</p> <p>After I was done being appalled, I thought about what ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estimated reading time: 1 minute
<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/jan/24/davos-2015-women-female-diversity-gender-equality-boards" target="_blank">Guardian article</a> I read that this year at the World Economic Forum in Davos female participation rose from a devastating 15% to intensely unacceptable 17%. Please keep in mind this year&#8217;s focus was on equality and integration.</p>
<p>After I was done being appalled, I thought about what the public actually sees from such events. We don&#8217;t see all the participants moving about, talking about the weather, the latest austerity package or whatever the cool kids talk about at such events. What the public gets to see are live streams of panel discussions and press conferences, and we see things like the <a href="http://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2015/speakers" target="_blank">list of speakers</a> that is made available on the <a href="http://www.weforum.org/" target="_blank">WEF website</a>.<br />
I&#8217;m not sure if this list is actually exhaustive but it is what is shown to us lowly internet users.</p>
<p>I wanted to know how serious the organisers were about ‘equality and inclusion’ and started to play around with the numbers. The list of things one could do with them is endless but I tried to focus on a few central ideas and made a flowchart to illustrate the depressing truth.</p>
<p>The total number of speakers was 355 at the time I started my research, 19% of those were women.<br />
Now, take some time and let these number sink in for a while&#8230;</p>
<p>(click to enlarge)</p>
<p><a href="http://finnporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/WEF15_flowchart_fem.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-465" src="http://finnporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/WEF15_flowchart_fem.png" alt="WEF15_flowchart_fem" width="770" height="1085" /></a></p>
<p>While it may be absolutely true that I have miscounted some numbers but I really don&#8217;t think that it would make a grave difference.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not yet done the same for the men of the event but from what I could see, equality and inclusion seems to be a pipe dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/wef15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effective Academic Reading</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/effective-academic-reading/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/effective-academic-reading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[academic reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://finnporter.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Estimated reading time: </p> <p>Have you ever tried finding a website that properly explains how to read and understand academic texts? There are three kinds: a) Those that discredit themselves visually and belong in the internet-museum. b) Those that are written like academic texts and therefore render themselves completely redundant from the start. c) Those ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Estimated reading time: 7 minutes
<p>Have you ever tried finding a website that properly explains how to read and understand academic texts? There are three kinds:<br />
a) Those that discredit themselves visually and belong in the internet-museum.<br />
b) Those that are written like academic texts and therefore render themselves completely redundant from the start.<br />
c) Those that put you to sleep before you… ZZZZZ.</p>
<p>There is no shame in not knowing how to read academically, even though the lack of online information on this topic might make it seem like that. Effective academic reading is a skill, and no one is born with it. I’d like to bring some light into this neglected corner of the internet for the sake of everyone who struggles with it, in a way that everyone can understand, because I believe that knowledge should be accessible for everyone, and not just for the elite. This is actually why we all struggle with academic texts in the first place; because people write like they don’t want anyone to read or understand it. There are exceptions, of course, and I do hope you will become one of those.</p>
<p>Now let’s get to it. When you’re first confronted with any type of academic text, you might feel overwhelmed. Don’t worry, that’s normal. We all know that feeling all too well.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #1: Don’t panic!</span></strong></p>
<figure id="attachment_252" style="width: 250px;" class="wp-caption alignright"><a title="(c) Death to Stock" href="http://join.deathtothestockphoto.com/" target="_blank"><img class="size-full wp-image-252 " style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://finnporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/DSCF3572-e1397289589409.jpg" alt="Take a breath. Everything will be fine." width="250" height="167" /></a><figcaption class="wp-caption-text">Take a breath. Everything will be fine.</figcaption></figure>
<p>No, really. Panic turns your brain into this big solid block of wood, and how many trees have you seen read an academic paper lately? Instead, just take a breath and think about that tub of ice cream that waits as a reward if you get through this*.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #2: Notice the cover</span></strong><br />
Don’t just jump into the text without taking note of the title and the author’s name. Know what, and especially whom you’re reading. This is a much-overlooked step, but taking the time to do this now will help you a lot later on.<br />
You&#8217;ll read other books and articles that mention a theory or movement and you’ll be all, “Hey cool, I’ve heard of this&#8221;. Remembering the title and the author will help you piece together the big picture in the long run and it will make future research easier. It’s worth it.<br />
Reading the title has another advantage. It tells you what the whole thing is about in the shortest possible way. It will have at least a keyword by which to remember the article or book.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #3: At first, just skim</span></strong><br />
Skim over the text once. I know, it’s tedious to read anything more than once, but it’s better than realising in class that you have no idea what it’s about and having to read it again.<br />
In the beginning skimming will probably make you feel like you’re trying to hypnotise yourself. No worries. It takes some practise but you’ll be able to do it soon enough. Look for keywords, things that pop up a couple of times in a paragraph, or words in capitals. Look at graphs and illustrations too.<br />
It helps if you split up the text into digestible chunks. This way you don’t make your brain flatline after page 4. Go for a couple of paragraphs, until the next headline etc. Then take a short break and look away from the paper or screen. It helps if you just look into the distance for a few seconds to relax your eyes and then go back to skimming over the next few paragraphs.<br />
While skimming mark those keywords. Over time you’ll develop your own system, but until then you’ll have to experiment a bit. Use colours and different kinds of pens to work out what works best for you. I’m not a fan of neon markers, but that’s another blog post right there.</p>
<p><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #4: Remember what you already know</span><br />
Now that you have a bit of an idea what the text in front of you deals with think about what you already know about the topic. Most likely that won’t be a lot at first. But maybe some of the keywords already ring a bell, and you can take a moment to remind yourself where you’ve heard it before and what it meant back then (it might have a different meaning in the context of your current reading material). This will help you with associations while reading. The more you know about a topic, the easier it will be to piece together all the little things you’ve read to one big picture.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #4a: Wikipedia is your friend</span></strong><br />
Yes, I mentioned the unmentionable. While I don’t encourage you to use Wikipedia as a source, it can be a great study help. Sometimes, when I start out on a new topic, I look up the most prominent or important keywords. Chances are they will be defined in the text, but if you have an idea about what those words generally mean, it will be easier for you to form your own opinion on the topic. Critical thinking is important. Don’t be afraid of using Wikipedia. You’re not using it as a credible source, just to form a general idea. Keeping that in mind just read the overview or the first paragraph and then force yourself to move on to the next keyword. It’s easy to get lost otherwise.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #5: Useless advice is being useless</span></strong><br />
Most guides will tell you right about now to have a goal, some type of question that you want to find an answer to while reading. Don’t do that. Just ignore them all. I will explain why this is bullshit in another blog post some time later. For now, just please trust me that it only makes sense for people writing their thesis. Sometimes. Maybe. So don’t do it.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #6: Go slow and have fun</span></strong><br />
Now this is the hard part. This is where you’ll need all the brains you have. But you can make it fun, and afterwards it’s ice cream time. Promised.<br />
Compared to the hypnotisingly fast reading in step 3, this will feel like you’re crawling a marathon on your knees. Keep in mind, it is not a race and everyone else’s knees are bleeding too. Go as slow as you need to.<br />
Again, split up the text, don’t read it all at once. I like to go from headline to headline or from argument to argument. Most articles and books will make it easy to find a stopping point. Just read. And after you’re done with one part, go back and make your annotations. This way, you’ll actually go over it one more time (and with a bit of practice you’ll even be able to do it in one go). Again, use colours and different kinds of pens. I like coloured pencils and the classic Stabilo fineliners. Underline, circle, draw, mark, write on the edges – whatever works for you. Sometimes crossing out a sentence can be immensely satisfying. There are NO rules. Whatever works for you is best.<br />
We learn best when we’re having fun doing it. I like meeting new people, and to me reading is just that. I’m getting to know the author. It’s a conversation, not a monologue. Interrupt him by writing things on the side. Ask her questions, and let them know when you agree and when you disagree. Explain why.<br />
You’ll find that you will have much more fun this way and you won’t fall asleep by page eight.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #6a: The road is paved</span></strong><br />
While reading you’ll want to keep an eye out for things that will help you understand arguments more easily.<br />
Try looking for structure. You don’t have to forge your own way through the jungle. Usually, authors will tell you what is going to happen, then go into detail, and sometimes even summarise it.<br />
Look for specific phrasing<br />
• indicating opposites: on the one hand/on the other hand, but, however,…<br />
• indicating structure: firstly, secondly etc., most importantly, to summarise, furthermore,…<br />
• indicating the arc of an argument: the main point, reasons, examples,…<br />
All of this will help you tell the important things from the filler stuff.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #0b8185;">Rule #7: Reward time!<a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/" target="_blank" rel="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-256" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="(c) Ian Britton FreeFoto.com" src="http://finnporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/icecream-e1397290347760.jpg" alt="icecream" width="250" height="167" /></a></span></strong><br />
As promised, now it’s ice cream time. You’ve managed to get through it and you deserve a reward, so don’t skimp on it. Remember to take regular 5-Minute-breaks while reading too, and keep hydrated. Nobody can study with a prune for a brain.</p>
<p>I hope this will help you get through your required reading lists from now on. I’m always curious about feedback. Was I able to help you? Do you want to add something or share your own tips? Don’t hesitate to contact me if you’re struggling with something else I can give you advice on.</p>
<p>*It can be vegan if you’re into that sort of thing. I love vegan maple pecan ice cream, but it’s ok if you want to reward yourself with a decent burger.</p>
<h6>Photo Credit:<br />
Title photo: (c) 2007 Hashir Milhan<br />
Trees: (c) Death to the Stock Photos<br />
Ice Cream: (c) Ian Britton FreeFoto.com</h6>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/effective-academic-reading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kelly McGonigal: How to make stress your friend</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/kelly-mcgonigal-how-to-make-stress-your-friend/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/kelly-mcgonigal-how-to-make-stress-your-friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyowlproductions.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve watched this talk and I couldn&#8217;t believe it: We as human beings have forgotten that physical reactions to stress are something positive. We used to see fear and stress as a survival mechanism and now we automatically fight it because we&#8217;ve become creatures of comfort. Everything that disturbs our comfort needs to be removed. ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve watched this talk and I couldn&#8217;t believe it: We as human beings have forgotten that physical reactions to stress are something positive. We used to see fear and stress as a survival mechanism and now we automatically fight it because we&#8217;ve become creatures of comfort. Everything that disturbs our comfort needs to be removed. By resisting those sources of discomfort we can live a healthier life. We do yoga and we meditate to learn to listen to our bodies and to live healthy lives, but we never do anything to accept that stress is part of our lives and that it is not necessarily a bad thing.<br />
Watch this talk and understand how to properly cope with stress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/kelly-mcgonigal-how-to-make-stress-your-friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will McAvoy on snark</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/will-mcavoy-snark/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/will-mcavoy-snark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 09:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron sorkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will mcavoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyowlproductions.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In &#8216;The Newsroom&#8217;s&#8217; Episode 3 of Season 2 Will McAvoy and Charlie Skinner have a little chat in Charlie&#8217;s office. Amongst other insightful things, Will states that <strong>&#8216;Snark is the idiot&#8217;s version of wit&#8217;</strong>. <a href="http://www.grumpygirlfilms.com/?load=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.grumpygirlfilms.com%2Fthe-newsroom-2x3-willie-pete-review%2F" target="_blank">Andie Katschthaler</a> has a valid point in arguing his statement is moot, because of what is said earlier, but ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In &#8216;The Newsroom&#8217;s&#8217; Episode 3 of Season 2 Will McAvoy and Charlie Skinner have a little chat in Charlie&#8217;s office. Amongst other insightful things, Will states that <strong>&#8216;Snark is the idiot&#8217;s version of wit&#8217;</strong>. <a href="http://www.grumpygirlfilms.com/?load=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.grumpygirlfilms.com%2Fthe-newsroom-2x3-willie-pete-review%2F" target="_blank">Andie Katschthaler</a> has a valid point in arguing his statement is moot, because of what is said earlier, but I like the quote nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/will-mcavoy-snark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Education</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/on-education/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/on-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyowlproductions.com/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/on-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popculture Feminism or the Story of how Irene Adler got sent back in time</title>
		<link>http://finnporter.com/popculture-feminism-or-the-story-of-how-irene-adler-got-sent-back-in-time/</link>
		<comments>http://finnporter.com/popculture-feminism-or-the-story-of-how-irene-adler-got-sent-back-in-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 15:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finnporter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film & TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moffatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sherlock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinyowlproductions.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know the site is still partially broken, but I didn&#8217;t get around to fixing it for various reasons. I thought I wasn&#8217;t going to write another blog post until I finished the repairs but it so happens that something came up. <p>This week Sherlock (the BBC series) premiered its season 2 with A Scandal ...]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<address>I know the site is still partially broken, but I didn&#8217;t get around to fixing it for various reasons. I thought I wasn&#8217;t going to write another blog post until I finished the repairs but it so happens that something came up.</address>
<p>This week Sherlock (the BBC series) premiered its season 2 with A Scandal in Belgravia. I have been watching series 1 and have thoroughly enjoyed it, except for the minor hiccup which is that Steven Moffat (and his team, but since he is the big shot he has final say on stuff) does not know how to write women that don&#8217;t succumb to the well known clichés used for depicting women in TV and Film.</p>
<p>I already knew that going in or to be fair I assumed that his writing women on Sherlock wouldn&#8217;t much differ from his writing women on Doctor Who, especially since the <a href="http://www.amazon.de/Adventures-Sherlock-Holmes-ebook/dp/B000JQU1VS/ref=sr_1_1?s=books-intl-de&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1325788212&amp;sr=1-1">source material </a>stems from times in which <a href="http://www.amazon.de/Suffer-Be-Still-Victorian-Midland/dp/0253201683/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1325788124&amp;sr=8-1">women</a> didn&#8217;t even have the right to own property, or study something that they wanted. I suggest you read &#8220;A Scandal in Bohemia&#8221;. It&#8217;s short, entertaining and even if you&#8217;ve seen the TV episode you won&#8217;t be spoiled about the ending, because it&#8217;s nothing like that. <em>Warning: Spoilers ahead.</em></p>
<p>Moffat&#8217;s writing has been discussed ad infinitum online. Just <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=steven+moffat+feminism">google</a> it. I enjoy his shows as much as the next fangirl but I cringe whenever the woman (and it&#8217;s mostly just one) gets to fulfill her plot point in his brilliant storylines. People have called Sherlock sexist, misogynist and many other things. I&#8217;ll try to go the other way. I&#8217;ll say Moffat&#8217;s writing is very <a href="http://www.amazon.de/Our-Androcentric-Culture-Man-Made-ebook/dp/B000FC20YM/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1325789944&amp;sr=8-10">androcentric</a>. It focuses on the male point of view and reaffirms the existing status of men in society. He recreates existing power structures by employing <a href="feministfrequency.com">TV tropes</a> and by gloriously failing the <a href="http://bechdeltest.com/">Bechdel test</a>, which I&#8217;m very critical of (Yes, I just ended that sentence with a preposition, deal with it).</p>
<p>I was looking forward to the TV version of &#8220;A Scandal in Bohemia&#8221;, because finally there would be a big female character that would show Sherlock that he is not invincible. But what they did with her was a gross distortion of her Victorian self.</p>
<p>Adler had to be gay because apparently only a lesbian dominatrix would be a good equivalent to a Victorian prostitute. But then again, we all know that lesbians are ugly hags who couldn&#8217;t get a man and since Adler is presented as a beautiful woman she can&#8217;t be serious about her gayness and falls for the irresistable Sherlock; who apparently failed biology. Dilated pupils and an elevated pulse can be symptoms of arousal, excitement, fear, drug use, poisoning, strokes and brain tumors amongst other things.<br />
It seems to me that Adler being gay was to satisfy teen boy fantasies. But I will gladly refute that argument if you show me the stuff that was left on the cutting room floor. You know, the material that proves that they were indeed trying to point out that sexuality is fluid while hunting for photographs of what can only be Kate Middleton chained to Adler&#8217;s bed by pink fluffy cuffs.</p>
<p>But as it turns out our modern Adler has lost much of her wit. She went and asked the big bad man, Moriarty, for help on how to play Sherlock, because god forbid she would be clever enough to do that on her own. While her Victorian self was able to outsmart Holmes, modern Adler needs him to rescue her. Well, I guess that&#8217;s what you get for being a clever, independent woman playing with the big boys.</p>
<p>Now, of course, one could start arguing that the men on the show get treated disrespectfully by Sherlock too and that some of them even need his rescuing capabilities. But this is beside the point, because they also get to be the hero. I would not be writing this if the scales weren&#8217;t so horribly tilted.</p>
<p>The importance of entertainment media in our societal evolution grows steadily. What we see on TV we try to copy. To make it painfully simple, if <em>malestream</em> media shows you a rich, good looking guy in a Ferrari you will want to be that guy. If the guy became what he is by suppressing others we will think that this is just what we have to do to get there. And please refrain from telling me it&#8217;s not true. If it weren&#8217;t, commercials wouldn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>So seeing the same stereotypes of women on TV will eventually lead us to a place where we forget that things can be different. Damsels in distress, the sexual predator, the chaste little girl, the asexual caretaker. Those are roles that in their various disguises women are allowed to fill. On and off screen. (For more on the role of women as virgin/whore read<a href="http://www.amazon.de/Tori-Amos-Piece-ebook/dp/B001NJUP8O/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1325792878&amp;sr=1-1"> this</a>)</p>
<p>Feminists pointing out that popular shows like Sherlock could easily nudge the status quo to change are not angry man-haters, who couldn&#8217;t get laid. They don&#8217;t project their fears on others, they are not trying to overpower anyone. They are asking for fairness and equality. I find it sad that young, intelligent women and men don&#8217;t seem to get that.</p>
<p>It is about equality, not about taking away someone&#8217;s rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://finnporter.com/popculture-feminism-or-the-story-of-how-irene-adler-got-sent-back-in-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
