<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Trademark and Copyright Law</title>
	
	<link>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:31:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<feedburner:info uri="trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsug" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/index.xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/index.xml" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.plusmo.com/add?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://plusmo.com/res/graphics/fbplusmo.gif">Subscribe with Plusmo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/_/hp/AddRSS.aspx?http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://img.tfd.com/hp/addToTheFreeDictionary.gif">Subscribe with The Free Dictionary</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bitty.com/manual/?contenttype=rssfeed&amp;contentvalue=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.bitty.com/img/bittychicklet_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Bitty Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.live.com/?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://tkfiles.storage.msn.com/x1piYkpqHC_35nIp1gLE68-wvzLZO8iXl_JMledmJQXP-XTBOLfmQv4zhj4MhcWEJh_GtoBIiAl1Mjh-ndp9k47If7hTaFno0mxW9_i3p_5qQw">Subscribe with Live.com</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://mix.excite.eu/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://image.excite.co.uk/mix/addtomix.gif">Subscribe with Excite MIX</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.webwag.com/wwgthis.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.webwag.com/images/wwgthis.gif">Subscribe with Webwag</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.podcastready.com/oneclick_bookmark.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.podcastready.com/images/podcastready_button.gif">Subscribe with Podcast Ready</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.wikio.com/subscribe?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.wikio.com/shared/img/add2wikio.gif">Subscribe with Wikio</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.dailyrotation.com/index.php?feed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com%2Findex.xml" src="http://www.dailyrotation.com/rss-dr2.gif">Subscribe with Daily Rotation</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Another Blow Is Struck Against Monetization of Copyright Enforcement Claims</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/eh7eQzH645w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/another-blow-is-struck-against-monetization-of-copyright-enforcement-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Boudett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1303</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[In a decision issued earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit held that the right to bring copyright claims cannot be transferred without an accompanying transfer of copyright ownership itself. The ruling came in consolidated cases which had been brought in the District of Nevada by Righthaven, LLC, an entity which had been founded for the purpose of [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/eh7eQzH645w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/another-blow-is-struck-against-monetization-of-copyright-enforcement-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/another-blow-is-struck-against-monetization-of-copyright-enforcement-claims/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=another-blow-is-struck-against-monetization-of-copyright-enforcement-claims</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Law Reform Engages Both Courts and Congress</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/aHuoyPmIn4I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/copyright-law-reform-engages-both-courts-and-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jenevieve Maerker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Law Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1284</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Big changes may be afoot in copyright law these days, via both litigation and legislation.  Courts are considering sweeping infringement claims with potentially far-reaching implications, and Congress is beginning the process of a massive overhaul of copyright statutes.  We provide here a brief rundown of some recent developments. Authors Guild v. Google As we have [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/aHuoyPmIn4I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/copyright-law-reform-engages-both-courts-and-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/copyright-law-reform-engages-both-courts-and-congress/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=copyright-law-reform-engages-both-courts-and-congress</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga:  She’s No (Copyright) Monster</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/Y172apWTnKc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/lady-gaga-shes-no-copyright-monster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Rufo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1268</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The federal district court in New Jersey has dismissed Stefani Germanotta, a.k.a. Lady Gaga, from a copyright lawsuit filed by composer and record producer Calvin Gaines.  Mr. Gaines alleged in his complaint that his writing and producing partner, Rob Fusari, proved to be something of a Judas by betraying their longstanding collaborative relationship.  According to [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/Y172apWTnKc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/lady-gaga-shes-no-copyright-monster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/lady-gaga-shes-no-copyright-monster/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=lady-gaga-shes-no-copyright-monster</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FiberCore Case Illustrates Ownership and Transferability of “Shop Rights” to Patented Inventions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/yDG0q2L5Jpw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/fibercore-case-illustrates-ownership-and-transferability-of-shop-rights-to-patented-inventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 14:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shop Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1253</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An employer may have rights in a patent on its employee’s invention in three situations: (1)  if there is an express agreement to assign or license the patent to the employer, (2)  if the employee was “hired to invent” and the employer can show an implied contract to assign the patent rights in the invention, [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/yDG0q2L5Jpw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/fibercore-case-illustrates-ownership-and-transferability-of-shop-rights-to-patented-inventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/fibercore-case-illustrates-ownership-and-transferability-of-shop-rights-to-patented-inventions/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=fibercore-case-illustrates-ownership-and-transferability-of-shop-rights-to-patented-inventions</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Spider-Man Lives to Web-Sling (and Sing) Another Day Following Settlement of Copyright Suit</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/vgw9AaXvWe8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/spider-man-lives-to-web-sling-and-sing-another-day-following-settlement-of-copyright-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 16:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Rufo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1238</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[After infamously departing (i.e., being fired) from the nascent production of the Broadway musical Spider-Man: Turn Off the Dark, acclaimed stage and screen director Julie Taymor filed suit against the show’s producers.  As discussed previously on this blog, Taymor brought claims for breach of contract as well as copyright infringement.  The stakes were high.  Had [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/vgw9AaXvWe8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/spider-man-lives-to-web-sling-and-sing-another-day-following-settlement-of-copyright-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/05/spider-man-lives-to-web-sling-and-sing-another-day-following-settlement-of-copyright-suit/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=spider-man-lives-to-web-sling-and-sing-another-day-following-settlement-of-copyright-suit</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Admissions of “Appropriation Artist” Not Fatal to Copyright Fair Use Defense</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/JHNiyv5W9Os/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/admissions-of-appropriation-artist-not-fatal-to-copyright-fair-use-defense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Kluft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1164</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The first prong of the fair use defense in copyright infringement cases, the “purpose and character of the use,” is often described as an inquiry into whether the allegedly infringing work is “transformative.” In other words, does the allegedly infringing work add something new, thus altering the message of the original, or does it essentially just [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/JHNiyv5W9Os" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/admissions-of-appropriation-artist-not-fatal-to-copyright-fair-use-defense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/admissions-of-appropriation-artist-not-fatal-to-copyright-fair-use-defense/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=admissions-of-appropriation-artist-not-fatal-to-copyright-fair-use-defense</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Viacom’s Copyright Suit against YouTube Again Faces DMCA Roadblocks in the District Court</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/duJ_h1ewI7s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/viacoms-copyright-suit-against-youtube-again-faces-dmca-roadblocks-in-the-district-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jenevieve Maerker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1153</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[            Following the Second Circuit’s remand order last year on appeal of an initial grant of summary judgment for YouTube, the Southern District of New York has revisited the issues in Viacom’s copyright infringement suit and again found that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) shields YouTube from liability for infringing video clips posted by [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/duJ_h1ewI7s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/viacoms-copyright-suit-against-youtube-again-faces-dmca-roadblocks-in-the-district-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/viacoms-copyright-suit-against-youtube-again-faces-dmca-roadblocks-in-the-district-court/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=viacoms-copyright-suit-against-youtube-again-faces-dmca-roadblocks-in-the-district-court</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Madrid Protocol:  A Passage to Indian Trademark Registration</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/wFWgzxgKN3o/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/the-madrid-protocol-a-passage-to-indian-trademark-registration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Weinstein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1140</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Madrid Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Trademarks (the “Protocol”) provides a simple, unified, cost-effective means for citizens of member countries (including the United States) to register their marks in other member countries.  By using the Protocol, trademark owners can obtain a single “International Registration” designating some or all of the member countries, instead [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/wFWgzxgKN3o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/the-madrid-protocol-a-passage-to-indian-trademark-registration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/the-madrid-protocol-a-passage-to-indian-trademark-registration/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-madrid-protocol-a-passage-to-indian-trademark-registration</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Private Matter:  Second Circuit Rules that Aereo’s TV Streaming Service is Not an Infringing Public Performance</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/tEz332fdw-o/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/a-private-matter-second-circuit-rules-that-aereos-tv-streaming-service-is-not-an-infringing-public-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 19:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Madeleine Rodriguez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Perfformance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1112</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[In an industry where technology is constantly evolving and racing to keep up with consumer habits, a recent court ruling came down to one basic component: antennas. Last Monday the Second Circuit ruled in favor of Aereo, Inc., a television streaming service, in a lawsuit filed by a consortium of network broadcasters who argued that [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/tEz332fdw-o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/a-private-matter-second-circuit-rules-that-aereos-tv-streaming-service-is-not-an-infringing-public-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/a-private-matter-second-circuit-rules-that-aereos-tv-streaming-service-is-not-an-infringing-public-performance/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-private-matter-second-circuit-rules-that-aereos-tv-streaming-service-is-not-an-infringing-public-performance</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Copyright Fair Use Defense Not Available to Aggregator of AP News Clips</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~3/XDm2dXfsvmQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/copyright-fair-use-defense-not-available-to-aggregator-of-ap-news-clips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hudson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Organizations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/?p=1050</guid>
		
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[  A U.S. federal court has held that the publication by a media monitoring service of excerpts from Associated Press news articles is copyright infringement for which the fair use defense is not available.  The Associated Press v. Meltwater U.S. Holdings, Inc. et al., 12 Civ. 1087 (March 21, 2013).  The case provides a victory [...]<br/>
<br/>
[Please click on the blog title to continue reading this post, share your comments and browse other articles.]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trademarkandcopyrightlawblog/wsUG/~4/XDm2dXfsvmQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/copyright-fair-use-defense-not-available-to-aggregator-of-ap-news-clips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com/2013/04/copyright-fair-use-defense-not-available-to-aggregator-of-ap-news-clips/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=copyright-fair-use-defense-not-available-to-aggregator-of-ap-news-clips</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.trademarkandcopyrightlawblog.com @ 2013-05-24 14:32:10 by W3 Total Cache -->
