<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</title><link>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language /><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20917.1142)</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/trivadis/ursmeier" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>Service wlansvc failed to start</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/A-y3613mNbc/service-wlansvc-failed-to-start.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 15:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:1787</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=1787</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/10/03/service-wlansvc-failed-to-start.aspx#comments</comments><description>Trying to install my mobile card on a new Windows Server 2008 ended with the message &amp;quot;service wlansvc failed to start. Check if you have the privilege...&amp;quot;. The point is, that the service was not installed. Solution: Administrative Tools &amp;gt;...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/10/03/service-wlansvc-failed-to-start.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1787" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/A-y3613mNbc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/10/03/service-wlansvc-failed-to-start.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Using Oracle 11g client result_cache with ODP.NET</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/CsHtAQidwNI/using-oracle-11g-client-result-cache-with-odp-net.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:594</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=594</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/04/24/using-oracle-11g-client-result-cache-with-odp-net.aspx#comments</comments><description>With Oracle 11g OCI clients can store result sets on the client. I was wondering how ODP.NET will use this feature and if there are any coding constraints. Required setup: The feature must be enabled server side by setting the init.ora parameter client_result_cache_size...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/04/24/using-oracle-11g-client-result-cache-with-odp-net.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=594" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/CsHtAQidwNI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/04/24/using-oracle-11g-client-result-cache-with-odp-net.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Oracle Query Notification revisited</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/BAb7PfKz6Lo/oracle-query-notification-revisited.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:593</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=593</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/04/23/oracle-query-notification-revisited.aspx#comments</comments><description>A few month ago I compared the .NET query notification possibilites between SQL Server and Oracle. At that time Oracle could only dectect changes at table level; not at row level. With the new release of ODP.NET 11.1 and Oracle 11g Oracle enhances the...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/04/23/oracle-query-notification-revisited.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=593" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/BAb7PfKz6Lo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2008/04/23/oracle-query-notification-revisited.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>HA Events vs. TAF with RAC and ODP.NET</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/Jv9uCOsBG6Q/ha-events-vs-taf-with-rac-and-odp-net.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:412</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=412</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/12/05/ha-events-vs-taf-with-rac-and-odp-net.aspx#comments</comments><description>Lately I had a question in this Blog about an ORA-25408. My first thought was, that TAF and HA events should not be mixed. In order to confirm this, I wrote a small application with 3 connection possibilites 1. Normal connection 2. TAF connection with...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/12/05/ha-events-vs-taf-with-rac-and-odp-net.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=412" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/Jv9uCOsBG6Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/RAC/default.aspx">RAC</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/12/05/ha-events-vs-taf-with-rac-and-odp-net.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Bulk Copy with SQL Server</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/GAkpMP8OdbI/bulk-copy-with-sql-server.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:398</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=398</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/11/19/bulk-copy-with-sql-server.aspx#comments</comments><description>SQL Server also offers an &amp;quot;array insert&amp;quot; possibility via .NET, which is called bulk copy . I wrote a similiar application as with the Oracle ODP.NET array insert. The point was not to compare Oracle vs. SQL Server, but to verify if the bulk...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/11/19/bulk-copy-with-sql-server.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=398" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/GAkpMP8OdbI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/SQLServer/default.aspx">SQLServer</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/11/19/bulk-copy-with-sql-server.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Array Insert with ODP.NET</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/rIpuEWtbwd8/array-insert-with-odp-net.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:396</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=396</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/11/18/array-insert-with-odp-net.aspx#comments</comments><description>ODP.NET supports array insert in two ways: 1. Binding arrays using ArrayBindCount cmd.Parameters.Add(&amp;quot;firstname&amp;quot;, OracleDbType.Varchar2, firstNames, ParameterDirection.Input); where firstNames is string[] 2. Binding to PL/SQL associative Arrays...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/11/18/array-insert-with-odp-net.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=396" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/rIpuEWtbwd8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/11/18/array-insert-with-odp-net.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Barrier free web design</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/8ieHTVm34eM/barrier-free-web-design.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:274</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=274</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/08/22/barrier-free-web-design.aspx#comments</comments><description>Excellent presentation, but in German, about barrier free Web Design. Direct Google-Link Weiter lesen......(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/08/22/barrier-free-web-design.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=274" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/8ieHTVm34eM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/08/22/barrier-free-web-design.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>RAC FAN and FCF</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/Gq7Kw72K7Pc/rac-fan-and-fcf.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:275</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=275</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/05/15/rac-fan-and-fcf.aspx#comments</comments><description>After the successfull RLB tests with RAC FAN events we re-tested the FCF with both Java and ODP.NET Startup As soon as the DBA puts an additional instance into a RAC service the client receives a FAN / FCF event. Both Java and .NET use the additional...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/05/15/rac-fan-and-fcf.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=275" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/Gq7Kw72K7Pc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/RAC/default.aspx">RAC</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Java/default.aspx">Java</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/05/15/rac-fan-and-fcf.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>More on RAC and RLB</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/F2ouJLrEgcw/more-on-rac-and-rlb.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:276</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=276</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/05/15/more-on-rac-and-rlb.aspx#comments</comments><description>My last RAC tests with runtime load balancing and .NET were not successful. ODP.NET always distributed the workload in a round robin manner. Now I know why: It is a AQ bug. I had more than one IP address defined (my real one and one for my vmWare). Since...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/05/15/more-on-rac-and-rlb.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=276" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/F2ouJLrEgcw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/RAC/default.aspx">RAC</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Java/default.aspx">Java</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/.Net/default.aspx">.Net</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/05/15/more-on-rac-and-rlb.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Linked Server Performance</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/2-OIhzS507s/linked-server-performance.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:277</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=277</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/03/07/linked-server-performance.aspx#comments</comments><description>Stefan Frutiger from Trivadis has extended my performance tests with linked server between SQL Server 2005 and Oracle 10g. First the hardware setup was enhanced: - 2 IBM laptops (T41 and T42) with W2003 and 1GB RAM - crossed cable as dedicated network...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/03/07/linked-server-performance.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=277" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/2-OIhzS507s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/SQLServer/default.aspx">SQLServer</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2007/03/07/linked-server-performance.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Linked Server to Oracle</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/gnBTlpYz9j4/linked-server-to-oracle.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 14:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:278</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=278</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/12/24/linked-server-to-oracle.aspx#comments</comments><description>Because of some performance problems with Linked Severs between SQL Server and Oracle, I did some additional tests. I tested Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.1399.06 (Intel X86) Oct 14 2005 00:33:37 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/12/24/linked-server-to-oracle.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=278" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/gnBTlpYz9j4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/SQLServer/default.aspx">SQLServer</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/12/24/linked-server-to-oracle.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Refactoring Databases</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/FD-mADaBDao/refactoring-databases.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 14:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:279</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=279</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/21/refactoring-databases.aspx#comments</comments><description>&amp;quot; Refactoring Databases&amp;quot; is a new book from Scott W. Ambler and Pramod J. Sadalage . They basically promote the agile development principles of software development into databases. The difficulty with databases is the fact, that we must manage...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/21/refactoring-databases.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=279" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/FD-mADaBDao" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Agile/default.aspx">Agile</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/21/refactoring-databases.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>citizendium</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/dAaz3M7oBfg/citizendium.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 10:19:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:280</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=280</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/18/citizendium.aspx#comments</comments><description>The &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; wikipedia starts under citizendium . I really admire and support people who are willing to put so much effort into public know-how or software, such as open source. But as as user of these open products, it is hard to understand...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/18/citizendium.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=280" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/dAaz3M7oBfg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/18/citizendium.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Agile Software Development</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/KjKOACRwDxw/agile-software-development.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:41:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:281</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=281</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/05/agile-software-development.aspx#comments</comments><description>Agile Development puts people over processes. In my opinion this is a good trend, even though not completely new. Lately I was reading a very interesting blog about Agile Software Development at Google . I agree with the comments of many readers: Steve...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/05/agile-software-development.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=281" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/KjKOACRwDxw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Agile/default.aspx">Agile</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/05/agile-software-development.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>CLB_GOAL LONG or SHORT?</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~3/mfgX6Fv7JRI/clb-goal-long-or-short.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">7f420732-9615-472e-9723-d9bd9f35b01c:282</guid><dc:creator>Urs Meier - Blog on IT</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=282</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/04/clb-goal-long-or-short.aspx#comments</comments><description>With Oracle 10g R2 FAN and FCF we can load balance connections and requests over a &amp;quot;service&amp;quot;. The service is defined to be run on one or more instances on the RAC. Services take a CLB_GOAL LONG or SHORT and are created with DBMS_SERVICE.CREATE_SERVICE...(&lt;a href="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/04/clb-goal-long-or-short.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blog.trivadis.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=282" width="1" height="1"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/trivadis/ursmeier/~4/mfgX6Fv7JRI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/TrivadisContent/default.aspx">TrivadisContent</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/RAC/default.aspx">RAC</category><category domain="http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/tags/Oracle/default.aspx">Oracle</category><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.trivadis.com/blogs/ursmeierblog/archive/2006/10/04/clb-goal-long-or-short.aspx</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
