<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Truden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mnogo.truden.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 21:57:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Relativity of simultaneity and length contraction debunked</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2017/08/relativity-of-simultaneity-debunked/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2017/08/relativity-of-simultaneity-debunked/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2017 11:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles and Forum postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[length contraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simultaneity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/?p=376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>To question the length contraction and the relativity of simultaneity I introduce a third simultaneous event in the ladder paradox problem. How?  Simply, by attaching a rod to each door, which is welded perpendicularly on the inside of the doors, in a way that the rod tips touch when both the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2017/08/relativity-of-simultaneity-debunked/">Relativity of simultaneity and length contraction debunked</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2017/08/relativity-of-simultaneity-debunked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time, Motion and Mind</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/04/about-time-motion-and-mind/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/04/about-time-motion-and-mind/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles and Forum postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/188.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Time! What is Time? The widely accepted definition of time which we know from school is: &#8220;Non spatial continuum in which the events occur.&#8221; My definition is: Time is the relation between two or more events Time is relevant and limited to the events. In philosophical discussions I always introduce [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/04/about-time-motion-and-mind/">Time, Motion and Mind</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/04/about-time-motion-and-mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>God for scientists</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/03/god-for-scientists/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/03/god-for-scientists/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles and Forum postings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God for scientists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science and God]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/187.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We had an interesting discussion in the already closed Orkut.com and I&#8217;d like to put here the spark which put the atheist forum in fire. Here it is with small changes and additions: So let&#8217;s see whether there is such a thing as &#8220;God for scientists&#8221;. I&#8217;ll start with the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/03/god-for-scientists/">God for scientists</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2009/03/god-for-scientists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bertrand Russell &#8211; how knowledge is created, who creates it, and where logic stays in it</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/bertrand-russell-knowledge-logic/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/bertrand-russell-knowledge-logic/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bertrand Russell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/185.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can human beings know anything, and if so, what and how? This question is really the most essentially philosophical of all questions.&#8221; &#8211; Bertrand Russell Not being offensive to Bertrand Russell&#8217;s logic I&#8217;d like to mark his question as illogical. Such question should not be uttered if it puts in doubt [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/bertrand-russell-knowledge-logic/">Bertrand Russell &#8211; how knowledge is created, who creates it, and where logic stays in it</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/bertrand-russell-knowledge-logic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awareness beforehand</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/awareness-beforehand/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/awareness-beforehand/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awareness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[existence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/184.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Concept An existence is claimed only after observation. Contrary to all philosophical claims and dictionary definitions, Existence is state of presence in an observation. The mind changes the concept by applying &#8220;existence&#8221; to the object, forgetting that the &#8220;existence&#8221; derived from (and actually is) awareness about presence. Awareness is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/awareness-beforehand/">Awareness beforehand</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/awareness-beforehand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 (Clarification for Dummies)</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/5050-clarification-for-dummies/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/5050-clarification-for-dummies/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/183.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The main problem in understanding the concept &#8220;Awareness beforehand&#8221; is: the mind do not pay attention to the fact that it works with meanings and concepts created after the observation. Once an existence was registered in observation the &#8220;existence&#8221; concept was created and from then on the mind applies the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/5050-clarification-for-dummies/">50/50 (Clarification for Dummies)</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/02/5050-clarification-for-dummies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 (Point of Exit)</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-point-of-exit/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-point-of-exit/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/182.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The closing of topic 50/50 in Rational Responders &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; POINT OF EXIT We are at the point of exit which comes with the end of the arguments. I can expect more discussions on my statement, but there is no way to refute it. Until you prove me wrong [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-point-of-exit/">50/50 (Point of Exit)</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-point-of-exit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 (Part Three)</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-three/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-three/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/181.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember what I said? &#8211; The Spirit has one only property, the capability to observe. Of course it has self-awareness (I Am). Through observation the spirit creates knowledge: &#8220;I observe one object, and there is one more and they are moving closer to each other&#8221;. The knowledge &#8220;there is other [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-three/">50/50 (Part Three)</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 (Part Two)</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-two/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-two/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/180.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In my opening of this topic I did not want to mention the &#8220;God&#8221; word and to set you on that track. I simply wanted to talk about the Universe which discussion and existence is only possible for us trough conscious observation and conscious discussion. I&#8217;m quite sure that a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-two/">50/50 (Part Two)</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>50/50 (Part One)</title>
		<link>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-one/</link>
					<comments>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-one/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Truden]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy and God]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mnogo.truden.com/archives/179.html</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A week ago I had interesting conversation with the atheists on Facebook until the topic was deleted. Fine, I said, it is not first time to delete my topic or comment. Just a week before that they deleted my comment from the first page of Mr. Dawkins web site. A [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-one/">50/50 (Part One)</a> appeared first on <a href="http://mnogo.truden.com">Truden</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>http://mnogo.truden.com/2008/01/5050-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
