<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Twitchy, Unreliable-Looking</title>
	
	<link>http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com</link>
	<description>Wherein b!X posts more than 140 characters at a time.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/tulcomments" /><feedburner:info uri="tulcomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on b!X Photos Now Sell For Base Price by The One True b!X</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tulcomments/~3/VxsmP8Gy8To/</link>
		<dc:creator>The One True b!X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/?p=1434#comment-339</guid>
		<description>Also, if the customer had spent roughly the same dollar amount under the old model -- say, $111.00 for two 10x15s and one 8x12 -- I would have made $82.21. So, I would have made a bit more money, but in exchange for someone having fewer prints of my photography. And, again, it's very possible, if not likely, that the order never would have been made at the rate of "$111.00 for three prints", &lt;em&gt;in which case I actually would have made nothing at all&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if the customer had spent roughly the same dollar amount under the old model &#8212; say, $111.00 for two 10x15s and one 8&#215;12 &#8212; I would have made $82.21. So, I would have made a bit more money, but in exchange for someone having fewer prints of my photography. And, again, it&#8217;s very possible, if not likely, that the order never would have been made at the rate of &#8220;$111.00 for three prints&#8221;, <em>in which case I actually would have made nothing at all</em>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tulcomments/~4/VxsmP8Gy8To" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/2010/08/20/bix-photos-now-sell-for-base-price/#comment-339</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on b!X Photos Now Sell For Base Price by The One True b!X</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tulcomments/~3/l7-pZoUoP9k/</link>
		<dc:creator>The One True b!X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 22:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/?p=1434#comment-338</guid>
		<description>The first order under the new model came in the day after launching it, which lets me offer up an example comparison.

This customer ordered three 10x15 prints, three 8x12 prints, and four 4x6 prints. Under the old model, this would have cost them $250, which likely accounts for why no one ever made such an order under the old model. Under the new model, all of those prints can be had for $38.95.

If the customer actually placed this order under the old model for the prohibitive price of $250, I would have received $184.59. Under the new model where it priced at $38.95, I receive only $1.47. However, at the time of purchase, this customer also added a donation of $75.00, of which I receive $69.00.

While $70.47 ($1.47 from the prints, plus the $69.00 donation) is a bit under half of $184.59, the latter profit would never have existed at all because the order would never have been placed. So in this example my potential profits aren't $70.47 versus $184.59, &lt;em&gt;but $70.47 versus nothing&lt;/em&gt;.

The customer who likely never would have bought this set of prints for $250 did so for less than half that, at $113.95 (item prices plus donation), resulting in me actually making some money, and them actually receiving a whopping ten prints. (Technically, then, I'm getting paid not just in the donation, but in the knowledge that someone wanted prints of ten of my photographs.)

Not every customer will donate at that high a level, of course. That's neither the point, nor the expectation. This first order under the new model just provides a nice comparative glimpse of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first order under the new model came in the day after launching it, which lets me offer up an example comparison.</p>
<p>This customer ordered three 10&#215;15 prints, three 8&#215;12 prints, and four 4&#215;6 prints. Under the old model, this would have cost them $250, which likely accounts for why no one ever made such an order under the old model. Under the new model, all of those prints can be had for $38.95.</p>
<p>If the customer actually placed this order under the old model for the prohibitive price of $250, I would have received $184.59. Under the new model where it priced at $38.95, I receive only $1.47. However, at the time of purchase, this customer also added a donation of $75.00, of which I receive $69.00.</p>
<p>While $70.47 ($1.47 from the prints, plus the $69.00 donation) is a bit under half of $184.59, the latter profit would never have existed at all because the order would never have been placed. So in this example my potential profits aren&#8217;t $70.47 versus $184.59, <em>but $70.47 versus nothing</em>.</p>
<p>The customer who likely never would have bought this set of prints for $250 did so for less than half that, at $113.95 (item prices plus donation), resulting in me actually making some money, and them actually receiving a whopping ten prints. (Technically, then, I&#8217;m getting paid not just in the donation, but in the knowledge that someone wanted prints of ten of my photographs.)</p>
<p>Not every customer will donate at that high a level, of course. That&#8217;s neither the point, nor the expectation. This first order under the new model just provides a nice comparative glimpse of things.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tulcomments/~4/l7-pZoUoP9k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/2010/08/20/bix-photos-now-sell-for-base-price/#comment-338</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on b!X Photos Now Sell For Base Price by The One True b!X</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tulcomments/~3/nECkpyRj9EI/</link>
		<dc:creator>The One True b!X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/?p=1434#comment-337</guid>
		<description>It'd be $5 more than you might otherwise have spent, which means $5 more than I otherwise would have gotten. $5 is my morning double Americano plus tip with $2 left over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d be $5 more than you might otherwise have spent, which means $5 more than I otherwise would have gotten. $5 is my morning double Americano plus tip with $2 left over.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tulcomments/~4/nECkpyRj9EI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/2010/08/20/bix-photos-now-sell-for-base-price/#comment-337</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on b!X Photos Now Sell For Base Price by Stephanie Stricklen</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tulcomments/~3/4jFfjjJ7os8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Stricklen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 17:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/?p=1434#comment-336</guid>
		<description>...but is it at all insulting if, say, i buy a photo but only donate, like, $5? i suppose that's $5 more than i might have spent otherwise, but i'm curious how you feel about small donations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but is it at all insulting if, say, i buy a photo but only donate, like, $5? i suppose that&#8217;s $5 more than i might have spent otherwise, but i&#8217;m curious how you feel about small donations.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tulcomments/~4/4jFfjjJ7os8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/2010/08/20/bix-photos-now-sell-for-base-price/#comment-336</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Connui Go! by B</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/tulcomments/~3/x-nCtI7IS2o/</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/?p=1304#comment-329</guid>
		<description>It looks and sounds like you had a great SDCC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks and sounds like you had a great SDCC!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/tulcomments/~4/x-nCtI7IS2o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.twitchyunreliablelooking.com/2010/08/10/connui-go/#comment-329</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
