<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>CGISecurity - Website and Application Security News</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1694854</id>
    <updated>2012-01-07T23:11:50-08:00</updated>
    <subtitle>All things related to website, database, SDL, and application security since 2000.
</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.cgisecurity.com/">CGISecurity</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/typepad/1216429516s8517/news" /><feedburner:info uri="typepad/1216429516s8517/news" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry>
        <title>Security Industry Plagiarism: Finding 3 examples in 5 minutes with Google </title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/f_aZYZncF24/detecting-plagiarism-with-google-and-book-search.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2012/01/detecting-plagiarism-with-google-and-book-search.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a288833015437d07740970c</id>
        <published>2012-01-07T23:11:50-08:00</published>
        <updated>2012-01-08T21:36:59-08:00</updated>
        <summary>I was taught in grade school that if you plan on writing something, never plagiarize. If you want to republish portions of existing content ensure you properly quote/reference them, and never represent this content as your own original work. Unfortunately it seems that this wasn't taught to at least 3 people who...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Books" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Commentary" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Forensics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Funny" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Off Topic" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Rant" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Site News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="XSS" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2012/01/detecting-plagiarism-with-google-and-book-search.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Quick defcon/blackhat preparation list</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/hO6zjrKVsDs/quick-defconblackhat-preperation-list.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/quick-defconblackhat-preperation-list.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2011-08-04T23:43:40-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a288833015434107d2b970c</id>
        <published>2011-07-28T13:25:19-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-07-28T14:32:48-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A couple of people had asked me what are some things that you can do prior to attending hacker cons such as Blackhat and Defcon. Kurt Cobain said it best "Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they're not after you'. Here's a short list (albeit not complete as I don't plan to...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Events" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Funny" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/quick-defconblackhat-preperation-list.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Summary of Google+ browser security protections</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/dApjRCHIpUg/summary-of-google-browser-security-protections.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/summary-of-google-browser-security-protections.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a28883301543409c1d8970c</id>
        <published>2011-07-27T10:03:26-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-07-27T10:03:26-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Ray "Vanhalen" Kelly has written a post describing the security mechanisms used by Google+, as well as compares them to facebook. In particular he reviews each HTTP protection header and provides a good explanation of the purpose of each protection. Link: http://www.barracudalabs.com/wordpress/index.php/2011/07/21/google-gets-a-1-for-browser-security-3/</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Browsers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/summary-of-google-browser-security-protections.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Paper: Web Application finger printing Methods/Techniques and Prevention</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/q7JsWr8VVBs/paper-web-application-finger-printing-methodstechniques-and-prevention.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/paper-web-application-finger-printing-methodstechniques-and-prevention.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a2888330153901404c9970b</id>
        <published>2011-07-21T13:51:40-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-07-21T13:51:40-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Anant Shrivastava has posted a whitepaper providing a rundown of application fingerprinting methodologies, as well as comparisons of various tools such as W3af, BlindElephant, and Wapplyzer. "This Paper discusses about a relatively nascent field of Web Application finger printing, how automated web application fingerprinting is performed in the current scenarios, what are...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Research" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/paper-web-application-finger-printing-methodstechniques-and-prevention.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Oracle website vulnerable to SQL Injection</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/JU4NFEsuhV4/oracle-website-vulnerable-to-sql-injection.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/oracle-website-vulnerable-to-sql-injection.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-07-27T11:41:00-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a288833014e899fad3a970d</id>
        <published>2011-07-05T15:21:44-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-07-05T15:21:44-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Someone has published a SQL Injection in labs.oracle.com at http://www.thehackernews.com/2011/07/oracle-website-vulnerable-to-sql.html . That is all.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Funny" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Incidents" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vulns" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/07/oracle-website-vulnerable-to-sql-injection.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>WASC Announcement: 'Static Analysis Tool Evaluation Criteria' Call For Participants</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/9_T8WuzgHzE/wasc-announcement-static-analysis-tool-evaluation-criteria-call-for-participants.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/06/wasc-announcement-static-analysis-tool-evaluation-criteria-call-for-participants.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a288833014e896db9c3970d</id>
        <published>2011-06-27T12:26:08-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-06-27T12:42:14-07:00</updated>
        <summary>I sent the following out to The Web Security Mailing List (which I moderate) announcing a new WASC Project. "The Web Application Security Consortium is pleased to announce a new project "Static Analysis Tool Evaluation Criteria (SATEC)". Currently WASC is seeking volunteers from various sections of the community including security researchers, academics,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Announcements" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Research" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="SDL" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Security Tools" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="WASC" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/06/wasc-announcement-static-analysis-tool-evaluation-criteria-call-for-participants.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Results of internet SSL usage published by SSL Labs</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/0ywrkLeitbA/results-of-internet-ssl-usage-published-by-ssl-labs.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/05/results-of-internet-ssl-usage-published-by-ssl-labs.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2011-06-22T16:45:57-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a28883301538eb65af4970b</id>
        <published>2011-05-25T09:53:19-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-06-22T16:45:32-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Ivan Ristic (of modsecurity fame) has published the results of an evaluation against over 900,000 websites supporting SSL. The goal of this evaluation was to see how people really use/misuse ssl in the wild, as well as report on the usage of browser protections such as the Secure cookie flag, and Strict-Transport-Security....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Browsers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cryptography" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Research" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vulns" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/05/results-of-internet-ssl-usage-published-by-ssl-labs.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Another use of Clickjacking, Cookiejacking!</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/YZ6PjlKjHY8/another-use-of-clickjacking-cookiejacking.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/05/another-use-of-clickjacking-cookiejacking.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a28883301543289377f970c</id>
        <published>2011-05-25T09:37:38-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-05-25T09:38:17-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Rosario Valotta has published an interesting attack against IE that takes advantage of clickjacking. In a nutshell it combines origin flaws within IE with clickjacking to trick a user into copying/pasting their own cookies from any site! Demonstration below The technical details can be found at https://sites.google.com/site/tentacoloviola/cookiejacking and his slides at https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;pid=sites&amp;srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnx0ZW50YWNvbG92aW9sYXxneDoxMWJlZTI5ZjVhYjdiODQx</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Browsers" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Research" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vendors" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vulns" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/05/another-use-of-clickjacking-cookiejacking.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>NIST publishes 50kish vulnerable code samples in Java/C/C++,  is officially krad</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/VWEjx0hQiCw/nist-publishes-50kish-vulnerable-code-samples-in-javacc-is-officially-krad.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/03/nist-publishes-50kish-vulnerable-code-samples-in-javacc-is-officially-krad.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-04-05T13:31:02-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a2888330147e3a522f6970b</id>
        <published>2011-03-31T10:17:06-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-31T10:17:14-07:00</updated>
        <summary>NIST has published a fantastic project (its been out since late December, but I only just became aware of it) where they've created vulnerable code test cases for much of MITRE's CWE project in Java and c/c++. From the README "This archive contains test cases intended for use by organizations and individuals...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Announcements" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Commentary" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Demo" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Development" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Research" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="SDL" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vulns" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/03/nist-publishes-50kish-vulnerable-code-samples-in-javacc-is-officially-krad.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>How not to publish SCADA security advisories</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/1216429516s8517/news/~3/H2MkYP3PTxk/how-not-to-publish-a-security-advisory.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/03/how-not-to-publish-a-security-advisory.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2011-04-13T16:49:33-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00e553aa1a288833014e6009a5d5970c</id>
        <published>2011-03-22T12:23:50-07:00</published>
        <updated>2011-03-22T12:31:34-07:00</updated>
        <summary>"Luigi Auriemma" has posted an interesting series of SCADA vulnerabilities to the bugtraq security list this morning. From his email "The following are almost all the vulnerabilities I found for a quick experiment some months ago in certain well known server-side SCADA softwares still vulnerable in this moment. In case someone doesn't...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Robert A.</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="IndustryNews" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Rant" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vendors" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Vulns" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Worms" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.cgisecurity.com/2011/03/how-not-to-publish-a-security-advisory.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 -->

