<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss1full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">

<channel rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/">
<title>Patent Law Blog (Patently-O)</title>
<link>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/</link>
<description>Patent Law Analysis by Dennis Crouch</description>
<dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
<dc:creator />
<dc:date>2009-12-22T13:11:16-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.typepad.com/" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/appellate-court-enforces-permanent-injunction-against-microsoft-word.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patentable-subject-matter-of-a-machine-that-uses-a-mathematical-algorithm.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/play-the-patent-office-director-game.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/pto-asks-for-comments-on-improving-patent-quality.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/information-on-the-public-patent-advisory-committee.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/when-have-novelty-rights-been-important.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-presumption-of-irreparable-harm.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-interplay-between-reexaminations-preliminary-injunctions-and-stays-of-litigation.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-role-of-the-patentees-expert-in-proving-infringement.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/judge-versus-jury-again-who-should-decide-the-question-of-obviousness.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/cases-where-written-description-is-satisfied-but-enablement-is-lacking.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/best-mode-at-the-bpai.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/predicted-2009-patent-application-filings.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/first-to-file-versus-first-inventor-to-file.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-matrix-for-first-inventor-to-file-an-experimental-investigation-into-proposed-changes-in-us-patent-law.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-requirement-that-the-written-description-be-concise.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-305.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/nicholas-cage-patent.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/europe-moves-toward-european-patents-and-european-patent-court.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-lowers-bar-for-declaratory-judgment-jurisdiction-when-patentee-is-a-holding-company.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/david-kappos-and-the-impact-of-ksr-a-unique-opportunity-for-our-profession.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/disclosing-related-cases-at-the-federal-circuit-eli-lillys-written-description-secret.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-304.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/design-law-protecting-copyrighted-designs.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-affirms-summary-judgment-of-obviousness-for-bulk-email-patent.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-orders-another-case-transferred-out-of-texas.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/aba-journals-top-100-legal-blogs.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/blocking-attorneys-from-both-litigating-and-prosecuting-patents.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/in-defense-of-software-patents-1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-2.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/ecuadors-compulsory-licensing-of-pharmaceutical-patent-rights.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/federal-circuit-chief-judge-paul-michel-announces-that-he-is-leaving-the-bench.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/federal-circuit-affirms-edtex-ruling-that-iovates-muscle-building-patents-are-invalid.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/nil-the-value-of-patents-in-a-major-crisis-such-as-an-influenza-pandemic.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/vacatur-judge-posner-agrees-to-vacate-inequitable-conduct-holding-based-on-settlement-agreement.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patent-on-tax-refund-system-deemed-invalid-under-section-101.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/post-ebay-injunctive-relief.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/design-patents-mueller-brean.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-new-job-openings.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/design-patents-functionality-and-trade-dress.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/a-brief-defense-of-the-written-description-requirement.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/my-entry.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/tafas-v-kappos-cleaning-up.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/survey-of-the-disruptive-impact-of-a-firsttofile-switch.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/precedential-bpai-opinion-rejects-functional-claim-elements-as-indefinite-and-not-enabled.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/red-hat-on-patents-video.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/kappos-blog-first-to-file.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rdf+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/typepad/ANlN" /><image rdf:resource="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/fb_pwrd.gif" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /></channel>

<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/appellate-court-enforces-permanent-injunction-against-microsoft-word.html">
<title>Appellate Court Enforces Permanent Injunction against Microsoft Word</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/lhipPUQn4_I/appellate-court-enforces-permanent-injunction-against-microsoft-word.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[By Dennis Crouch i4i Limited Partnership v. Microsoft Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2009) (Judges Schall, Prost, & Moore; opinion by Judge Prost) The i4i district court decision created some turmoil this past...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/lhipPUQn4_I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-22T13:11:16-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/appellate-court-enforces-permanent-injunction-against-microsoft-word.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patentable-subject-matter-of-a-machine-that-uses-a-mathematical-algorithm.html">
<title>Patentable Subject Matter of a Machine that Uses a Mathematical Algorithm </title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/0tHgOSzyFLE/patentable-subject-matter-of-a-machine-that-uses-a-mathematical-algorithm.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ex Parte Gutta (BPAI 2009)(Precedential) In its fourth precedential opinion of 2009, an enlarged panel of the BPAI has created a new test for judging whether a claimed machine (or article of...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/0tHgOSzyFLE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-21T17:16:51-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patentable-subject-matter-of-a-machine-that-uses-a-mathematical-algorithm.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes NO. 306</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/iVduFXViG-Y/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[A University of Missouri student and entrepreneur was recently sued by the North Face for trademark infringement. The student’s company is called “the South Butt.” On the issue of confusion, the...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/iVduFXViG-Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-20T07:46:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/play-the-patent-office-director-game.html">
<title>Gifts for a Patent Attorney: The Patent Office Director Game!</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/3zf7gmaaZXE/play-the-patent-office-director-game.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[The USPTO has released its patent pendency simulator so that you can play at home. The Patent Pendency Model (PPM) is a Simulation Tool that predicts patent production output based on actual...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/3zf7gmaaZXE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-19T07:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/play-the-patent-office-director-game.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/pto-asks-for-comments-on-improving-patent-quality.html">
<title>PTO Asks for Comments on Improving Patent Quality</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/u6MwopxyamA/pto-asks-for-comments-on-improving-patent-quality.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[The PTO is on a mission to “improve the quality of the overall patent examination and prosecution process, to reduce patent application pendency, and to ensure that granted patents are valid and...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/u6MwopxyamA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-18T10:37:49-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/pto-asks-for-comments-on-improving-patent-quality.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/information-on-the-public-patent-advisory-committee.html">
<title>Information on the Public Patent Advisory Committee</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/-42W2pJRrLs/information-on-the-public-patent-advisory-committee.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[The USPTO’s Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC) is charged with reviewing the “policies, goals, performance, budget, and fees” of the USPTO. The PPAC tends to work closely with USPTO upper...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/-42W2pJRrLs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-18T10:11:48-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/information-on-the-public-patent-advisory-committee.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/when-have-novelty-rights-been-important.html">
<title>When have Novelty Rights Been Important?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/QuZcI5035vI/when-have-novelty-rights-been-important.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the next few days, I’ll be distributing a draft of my working paper on the role the invention date in ex parte prosecution. I’m looking for citations for the following proposition: Supporters of...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/QuZcI5035vI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-17T10:50:17-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/when-have-novelty-rights-been-important.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-presumption-of-irreparable-harm.html">
<title>The Presumption of Irreparable Harm?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/Ulz557iebUU/the-presumption-of-irreparable-harm.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[By Dennis Crouch In a non-precedential opinion, the Federal Circuit recently decided the important and open question of whether the Supreme Court’s decision 2006 in eBay v. MercExchange eliminated...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/Ulz557iebUU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Injunctions</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patent Cases 2009</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-16T16:34:56-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-presumption-of-irreparable-harm.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-interplay-between-reexaminations-preliminary-injunctions-and-stays-of-litigation.html">
<title>The Interplay between Reexaminations, Preliminary Injunctions and Stays of Litigation</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/Die209Z3yds/the-interplay-between-reexaminations-preliminary-injunctions-and-stays-of-litigation.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[by Dennis Crouch Automated Merchandising Systems (AMS) v. Crane Co. (Fed. Cir. 2009)(nonprecedential) We are approaching the point that most patents being litigated are also undergoing a parallel...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/Die209Z3yds" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-16T12:37:22-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-interplay-between-reexaminations-preliminary-injunctions-and-stays-of-litigation.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-role-of-the-patentees-expert-in-proving-infringement.html">
<title>The Role of the Patentee's Expert in Proving Infringement  </title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/1B0A_sL_rnM/the-role-of-the-patentees-expert-in-proving-infringement.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Intellectual Science and Technology v. Sony Electronics (Fed. Cir. 2009). This decision follows a long line of cases warning against the use of means-plus-function claim language. The decision should...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/1B0A_sL_rnM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-16T00:43:16-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-role-of-the-patentees-expert-in-proving-infringement.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/judge-versus-jury-again-who-should-decide-the-question-of-obviousness.html">
<title>Judge versus Jury (Again): Who Should Decide the Question of Obviousness?</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/tdbG4e_4L4g/judge-versus-jury-again-who-should-decide-the-question-of-obviousness.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Acushnet Co. v. Callaway Golf Co . (on petition for certiorari 2009) The Supreme Court recently rejected Medela's petition for certiorari arguing that the conclusion of obviousness should be made by...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/tdbG4e_4L4g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-15T02:48:10-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/judge-versus-jury-again-who-should-decide-the-question-of-obviousness.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/cases-where-written-description-is-satisfied-but-enablement-is-lacking.html">
<title>Cases where Written Description is Satisfied, but Enablement is Lacking</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/T9bSCXp1fko/cases-where-written-description-is-satisfied-but-enablement-is-lacking.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[In Ariad, an en banc Federal Circuit is set to determine whether (and how) the written description requirement is separate and distinct from enablement. The questions presented read as follows: 1....<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/T9bSCXp1fko" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-14T17:02:12-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/cases-where-written-description-is-satisfied-but-enablement-is-lacking.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/best-mode-at-the-bpai.html">
<title>Best Mode at the BPAI</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/VGGZB7qGV3I/best-mode-at-the-bpai.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ex parte Lin, Appeal No. 2009-4275, Application No. 10/255,216 (BPAI October 30, 2009) The Examiner rejected Lin's patent application for failure to comply with the best mode requirement of 35 USC §...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/VGGZB7qGV3I" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-13T22:38:27-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/best-mode-at-the-bpai.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/predicted-2009-patent-application-filings.html">
<title>Predicted 2009 Patent Application Filings</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/TyrYTUnP2vA/predicted-2009-patent-application-filings.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[via CNN in an article titled: "Recession's latest victim: U.S. innovation." Dennis Crouch's Comment: Patent filings are clearly down, but I don't know that I agree with the reporter's conclusion that...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/TyrYTUnP2vA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-11T11:32:01-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/predicted-2009-patent-application-filings.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/first-to-file-versus-first-inventor-to-file.html">
<title>First-to-File versus First-Inventor-to-File</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/ynNDqqFFJGI/first-to-file-versus-first-inventor-to-file.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the US, an inventor's evidence of pre-filing conception, diligence, and reduction-to-practice can help win a priority contest against a competing inventor and can also negate would-be prior art....<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/ynNDqqFFJGI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-11T10:53:25-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/first-to-file-versus-first-inventor-to-file.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-matrix-for-first-inventor-to-file-an-experimental-investigation-into-proposed-changes-in-us-patent-law.html">
<title>The "Matrix" for First-Inventor-To-File: An Experimental Investigation into Proposed Changes in US Patent Law</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/JZSmt6IplOg/the-matrix-for-first-inventor-to-file-an-experimental-investigation-into-proposed-changes-in-us-patent-law.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guest Post by Brad Pedersen and Justin Woo (Read their Full Article at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1518660) The Patent Reform Act of 2009 would replace the current “first-to-invent” (FTI) system with a...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/JZSmt6IplOg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-10T15:46:14-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-matrix-for-first-inventor-to-file-an-experimental-investigation-into-proposed-changes-in-us-patent-law.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-requirement-that-the-written-description-be-concise.html">
<title>The Requirement that the Written Description be Concise</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/vdFgucEWkTg/the-requirement-that-the-written-description-be-concise.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[By Dennis Crouch The Patent Act requires that the written description of an invention be “concise.” 35 U.S.C. 112p1. The meaning of that requirement is unclear, but but the language of Section 112 at...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/vdFgucEWkTg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-09T16:56:04-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/the-requirement-that-the-written-description-be-concise.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-305.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 305</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/NT2QfbolS94/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-305.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Worksharing: Website of the five IP Offices: http://www.fiveipoffices.org. GoogleNexis?: Google Scholar now includes judicial opinions and law review articles. [Link] The site does a nice job of...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/NT2QfbolS94" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-09T10:04:14-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-305.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/nicholas-cage-patent.html">
<title>Patents and the Movie Industry: Stopping Nicholas Cage</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/4ba4NBbjU7w/nicholas-cage-patent.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[By Dennis Crouch Global Findability v. Summit Entertainment (D.D.C. 2009) In an earlier post, I reported on an odd complaint that charges Summit Entertainment with patent infringement based on that...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/4ba4NBbjU7w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-08T07:52:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/nicholas-cage-patent.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/europe-moves-toward-european-patents-and-european-patent-court.html">
<title>Europe Moves Toward European Patents and European Patent Court</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/_qTQJ-yfZt8/europe-moves-toward-european-patents-and-european-patent-court.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[The European Union (EU) is working toward a major reform of its patent laws that would create a European Patent and a European Patent Court for handling patent infringement litigation. Although the...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/_qTQJ-yfZt8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-07T12:36:16-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/europe-moves-toward-european-patents-and-european-patent-court.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-lowers-bar-for-declaratory-judgment-jurisdiction-when-patentee-is-a-holding-company.html">
<title>Federal Circuit Lowers Bar for Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction When Patentee is a Holding Company</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/lfYquO84VW8/federal-circuit-lowers-bar-for-declaratory-judgment-jurisdiction-when-patentee-is-a-holding-company.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hewlett-Packard v. Acceleron 09-1283.pdf (Fed. Cir. 2009) Acceleron's patent No. 6,948,021 covers a hot-swappable server blade. In September 2007, Acceleron wrote to "call [HP's] attention to the...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/lfYquO84VW8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Declaratory Judgment</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patent Cases 2009</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-07T11:35:26-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-lowers-bar-for-declaratory-judgment-jurisdiction-when-patentee-is-a-holding-company.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/david-kappos-and-the-impact-of-ksr-a-unique-opportunity-for-our-profession.html">
<title>David Kappos and The Impact of KSR – a unique opportunity for our profession</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/kp8G5Pj-vL4/david-kappos-and-the-impact-of-ksr-a-unique-opportunity-for-our-profession.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guest Post by Paul Cole, Visiting Professor, Intellectual Property Law, Bournemouth University, UK On Tuesday 24 November, David Kappos made a posting on the Director’s Forum including the following...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/kp8G5Pj-vL4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-05T20:42:44-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/david-kappos-and-the-impact-of-ksr-a-unique-opportunity-for-our-profession.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/disclosing-related-cases-at-the-federal-circuit-eli-lillys-written-description-secret.html">
<title>Disclosing “Related Cases” at the Federal Circuit: Eli Lilly’s Written Description “Secret”</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/Wp4ySmhdK58/disclosing-related-cases-at-the-federal-circuit-eli-lillys-written-description-secret.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guest Post by Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego School of Law As any diligent reader of Patently-O would know, the Federal Circuit is considering en banc whether to retain the written...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/Wp4ySmhdK58" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-03T23:59:20-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/disclosing-related-cases-at-the-federal-circuit-eli-lillys-written-description-secret.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-304.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 304</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/ZyN1d9636oE/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-304.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Next Monday (December 7, 2009) at 2:00 P.M. in Room 201, the Federal Circuit will hear en banc arguments in the case of Ariad Pharmaceutical v. Eli Lilly. The case questions whether Section 112 of...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/ZyN1d9636oE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-03T12:39:43-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-no-304.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/design-law-protecting-copyrighted-designs.html">
<title>Design Law: Protecting Copyrighted Designs</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/Mu9YiCB4pzk/design-law-protecting-copyrighted-designs.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Design Ideas v. Things Remembered, 3:07-cv-03077 (C.D. Ill. Filed March 16, 2007) Perry Saidman is a frequent contributory to Patently-O -- especially when the topic turns to design patent law. In a...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/Mu9YiCB4pzk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Design Patent</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patent Cases 2009</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-02T15:07:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/design-law-protecting-copyrighted-designs.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-affirms-summary-judgment-of-obviousness-for-bulk-email-patent.html">
<title>Federal Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment of Obviousness for Bulk EMail Patent</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/QxCSpL304UE/federal-circuit-affirms-summary-judgment-of-obviousness-for-bulk-email-patent.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Perfect Web Technologies v. InfoUSA (Fed. Cir. 2009) Perfect Web's asserted patent covers a method of managing bulk e-mail distribution. Claim 1 of the application (filed in 2000) reads as follows:...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/QxCSpL304UE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Anticipation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Obviousness</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patent Cases 2009</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Patentable Subject Matter</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-02T14:11:28-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-affirms-summary-judgment-of-obviousness-for-bulk-email-patent.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-orders-another-case-transferred-out-of-texas.html">
<title>Federal Circuit Orders Another Case Transferred Out of Texas</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/3YeaI5j7I9E/federal-circuit-orders-another-case-transferred-out-of-texas.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[In re Hoffamann-La Roche (Fed. Cir. 2009)(on writ of mandamus) Novartis sued Roche and its partners in the Eastern District of Texas for infringement of its HIV treatment patent. After being denied...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/3YeaI5j7I9E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Patent Cases 2009</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Pharma</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-02T12:16:42-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/federal-circuit-orders-another-case-transferred-out-of-texas.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 303</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/EioWYyjWmfI/patently-o-bits-and-bytes.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor Lichtman and his students at UCLA reenact Bilski v. Kappos. [Download the MP3] Jeremy Grushcow discusses “three need-to-know Canadian patent decisions that impact pharma, biotech and...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/EioWYyjWmfI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-02T06:51:54-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/patently-o-bits-and-bytes.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/aba-journals-top-100-legal-blogs.html">
<title>ABA Journal's Top 100 Legal Blogs</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/g9QBXz1D85U/aba-journals-top-100-legal-blogs.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[For the third-year running, the ABA Journal has selected Patently-O as one of the top 100 legal weblogs — “the best legal blogs as selected by the Journal's editors.” Last year, readers also voted...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/g9QBXz1D85U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-01T08:49:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/aba-journals-top-100-legal-blogs.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/blocking-attorneys-from-both-litigating-and-prosecuting-patents.html">
<title>Blocking Attorneys from Simultaneously Litigating and Prosecuting Patents</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/sTsoDcYwKgY/blocking-attorneys-from-both-litigating-and-prosecuting-patents.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[In re Deutsche Bank Trust (Fed. Cir. 2009) (on motion for stay of order) Island IP and its corporate parent Double Rock sued Deutsche Bank and others for infringement of their patent covering a bank...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/sTsoDcYwKgY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-12-01T06:13:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/12/blocking-attorneys-from-both-litigating-and-prosecuting-patents.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/in-defense-of-software-patents-1.html">
<title>In Defense of Software Patents</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/VGZLTMzaD70/in-defense-of-software-patents-1.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Guest Post by Martin Goetz This article is in response to the editorial “Abandoning Software Patents” by the Ciaran O’Riordan, Director of End Software Patents (posted on PatentlyO on November 6,...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/VGZLTMzaD70" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-30T05:44:04-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/in-defense-of-software-patents-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-2.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 302</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/XS2O2Nu4hfg/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-2.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Texas Juries: Michael Smith reviews E.D. Texas patent trial verdicts for 2009 (thus far). Depending upon how you count, the score ranges "from 8-3-1 to 6-6-1 (depend[ing] on whether you count a...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/XS2O2Nu4hfg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-24T09:04:26-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-2.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/ecuadors-compulsory-licensing-of-pharmaceutical-patent-rights.html">
<title>Ecuador's Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patent Rights</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/wlyMQulE_PA/ecuadors-compulsory-licensing-of-pharmaceutical-patent-rights.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Under the TRIPS agreement member Nations can force compulsory patent licenses at their discretion. The 2001 Doha declaration clarifies this point: "Each member has the right to grant compulsory...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/wlyMQulE_PA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-23T21:23:16-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/ecuadors-compulsory-licensing-of-pharmaceutical-patent-rights.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 301</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/BbAQvaJsoOU/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Jobs Postings from the Past Week: Patent Portfolio Manager - Small Corporation - Mississauga, Ontario IP Attorney - Large Corporation - Holmdel, N.J. (Updated Link) Patent Agent - Large Corporation -...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/BbAQvaJsoOU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-23T00:40:39-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-1.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/federal-circuit-chief-judge-paul-michel-announces-that-he-is-leaving-the-bench.html">
<title>Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel Announces that he is Leaving the Bench</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/4_cf7XsFtLI/federal-circuit-chief-judge-paul-michel-announces-that-he-is-leaving-the-bench.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul Michel was the featured speaker at the November 20, 2009 Federal Circuit Bar Association Annual Dinner. At that dinner, Chief Judge Michel took that opportunity to...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/4_cf7XsFtLI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-21T09:52:40-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/federal-circuit-chief-judge-paul-michel-announces-that-he-is-leaving-the-bench.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/federal-circuit-affirms-edtex-ruling-that-iovates-muscle-building-patents-are-invalid.html">
<title>Federal Circuit Affirms EDTex Ruling that Iovate's Muscle Building Patents are Invalid </title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/8yyclna5-sA/federal-circuit-affirms-edtex-ruling-that-iovates-muscle-building-patents-are-invalid.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Iovate & University of Florida Research Foundation v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition (BSN) (Fed. Cir. 2009) (Download 09-1018) Iovate is the exclusive licensee of UF's patented method for...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/8yyclna5-sA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-20T12:13:32-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/federal-circuit-affirms-edtex-ruling-that-iovates-muscle-building-patents-are-invalid.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/nil-the-value-of-patents-in-a-major-crisis-such-as-an-influenza-pandemic.html">
<title>Nil: The Value of Patents in a Major Crisis Such as an Influenza Pandemic</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/p-VYiA3-6b4/nil-the-value-of-patents-in-a-major-crisis-such-as-an-influenza-pandemic.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have posted a short draft essay to SSRN that is being published in the Seton Hall Law Review as part of their annual Health Law Symposium. The overall topic of the symposium is Preparing for a...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/p-VYiA3-6b4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-19T09:00:29-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/nil-the-value-of-patents-in-a-major-crisis-such-as-an-influenza-pandemic.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/vacatur-judge-posner-agrees-to-vacate-inequitable-conduct-holding-based-on-settlement-agreement.html">
<title>Vacatur: Judge Posner Agrees to Vacate Inequitable Conduct Holding Based on Settlement Agreement</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/dg319Krqvvg/vacatur-judge-posner-agrees-to-vacate-inequitable-conduct-holding-based-on-settlement-agreement.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[New Medium v. Barco (N.D. Ill. 2009) Seventh Circuit Appellate Judge Richard Posner heard this case sitting by designation in the Northern District of Illinois. The final judgment is interesting in...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/dg319Krqvvg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-18T20:20:02-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/vacatur-judge-posner-agrees-to-vacate-inequitable-conduct-holding-based-on-settlement-agreement.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patent-on-tax-refund-system-deemed-invalid-under-section-101.html">
<title>Patent on Tax Refund System Deemed Invalid under Section 101</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/W13wJu8t6aE/patent-on-tax-refund-system-deemed-invalid-under-section-101.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[H&R Block v. Jackson Hewitt (E.D. Tex. 2009) E.D. Texas Magistrate Judge Love has recommended that H&R Block's advance-tax-refund patents be held invalid for failing to claim patentable subject...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/W13wJu8t6aE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-17T12:42:17-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patent-on-tax-refund-system-deemed-invalid-under-section-101.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/post-ebay-injunctive-relief.html">
<title>Post EBay Injunctive Relief</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/O2l0OLSN8DA/post-ebay-injunctive-relief.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[IP Today has published an interesting report on permanent injunction decisions since the Supreme Court's 2006 decision in eBay v. MercExchange. The authors found 67 district court injunction...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/O2l0OLSN8DA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-17T12:12:01-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/post-ebay-injunctive-relief.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/design-patents-mueller-brean.html">
<title>Design Patents: Mueller &amp; Brean</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/w84hf_BU5HQ/design-patents-mueller-brean.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Professor Janice Mueller & Daniel Brean have posted a new working-draft article on design patent protection. The article argues "that courts and the USPTO have previously unrecognized flexibility in...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/w84hf_BU5HQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Academic Studies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Articles and Publications</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Design Patent</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-17T07:10:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/design-patents-mueller-brean.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-new-job-openings.html">
<title>Patently-O Bits and Bytes No. 138: New Job Openings</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/sSPPtZnC6hQ/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-new-job-openings.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Patent Prosecutor - Law Firm - Woodbridge, N.J. Patent Counsel - Small Corporation - Cambridge, Mass. Patent Attorney (Prosecution) - Law Firm - Alexandria, Va. Sr. Intellectual Property Counsel -...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/sSPPtZnC6hQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Bits and Bytes</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-16T16:59:54-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/patently-o-bits-and-bytes-new-job-openings.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/design-patents-functionality-and-trade-dress.html">
<title>Design Patents: Functionality and a Trade Dress Gap Filler</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/Rqz2tCrJ44o/design-patents-functionality-and-trade-dress.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bissell Homecare v. Wildwood Industries (W.D. Mich. 2009) This case is not likely to move much beyond the pleadings because the accused infringer (Wildwood) has declared bankruptcy. Wildwood sells...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/Rqz2tCrJ44o" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>


<dc:subject>Design Patent</dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-16T15:25:50-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/design-patents-functionality-and-trade-dress.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/a-brief-defense-of-the-written-description-requirement.html">
<title>A Brief Defense of the Written Description Requirement</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/FOKAIxcTypI/a-brief-defense-of-the-written-description-requirement.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[by Michael Risch The Federal Circuit’s upcoming consideration of Ariad v. Lilly has generated a fair amount of buzz among those who follow patent policy. The dispute arises from the interpretation of...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/FOKAIxcTypI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-15T21:57:16-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/a-brief-defense-of-the-written-description-requirement.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/my-entry.html">
<title />
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/LO7AGCgIU5c/my-entry.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/LO7AGCgIU5c" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-13T14:32:53-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/my-entry.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/tafas-v-kappos-cleaning-up.html">
<title>Tafas v. Kappos: Cleaning Up</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/uIlkl1Vn75s/tafas-v-kappos-cleaning-up.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Tafas & GSK v. Kappos (Fed. Cir. 2009) (En banc order) After a two-year battle and under the new leadership of David Kappos, the PTO recently withdrew its proposed rules package that would limit the...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/uIlkl1Vn75s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-13T14:31:53-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/tafas-v-kappos-cleaning-up.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/survey-of-the-disruptive-impact-of-a-firsttofile-switch.html">
<title>Survey of the Disruptive Impact of a First-to-File Switch</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/EkdSUHKE89A/survey-of-the-disruptive-impact-of-a-firsttofile-switch.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Take the survey on a separate page: Click Here to take survey Take the survey on a separate page: Click Here to take survey<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/EkdSUHKE89A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-11T16:02:02-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/survey-of-the-disruptive-impact-of-a-firsttofile-switch.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/precedential-bpai-opinion-rejects-functional-claim-elements-as-indefinite-and-not-enabled.html">
<title>Precedential BPAI Opinion Rejects Functional Claim Elements as Indefinite and Not Enabled</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/YVza21V_qgk/precedential-bpai-opinion-rejects-functional-claim-elements-as-indefinite-and-not-enabled.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ex parte Rodriguez, 08-0693 (BPAI 2009) (Precedential) fd080693.pdf In its first precedential decision since February 2009, an expanded BPAI panel has applied the Federal Circuit's 2008 Aristocrat...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/YVza21V_qgk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-11T14:29:00-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/precedential-bpai-opinion-rejects-functional-claim-elements-as-indefinite-and-not-enabled.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/red-hat-on-patents-video.html">
<title>Red Hat on Patents (VIDEO)</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/KTwsWHJnLaQ/red-hat-on-patents-video.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[The video prominently features BU law professor and economist Michael Meurer whose book Patent Failure (with Jim Bessen) uses economic analysis to make the case that patents (particularly software...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/KTwsWHJnLaQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T17:55:34-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/red-hat-on-patents-video.html</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/kappos-blog-first-to-file.html">
<title>Kappos Blog &amp; First-to-File</title>
<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~3/1pnC-KIXAh8/kappos-blog-first-to-file.html</link>

<content:encoded><![CDATA[Director Kappos has created a new blog that is available via the PTO website. The blog (titled the "Director's Forum") looks to be an excellent avenue for the Director to stay in-touch with patent...<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/typepad/ANlN/~4/1pnC-KIXAh8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>



<dc:creator>Dennis Crouch</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T15:17:40-05:00</dc:date>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2009/11/kappos-blog-first-to-file.html</feedburner:origLink></item>


<image rdf:about="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/fb_pwrd.gif"><url>http://www.feedburner.com/fb/images/pub/fb_pwrd.gif</url><link>http://www.patentlyo.com/patently_blog.gif</link><title>Patently-O</title></image></rdf:RDF><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:from_kauri -->
