<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Cobb</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-332375</id>
    <updated>2009-07-18T08:50:26-07:00</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/typepad/BWZR" type="application/atom+xml" /><entry>
        <title>Walter Cronkite: Dead</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/xLZzixL50X4/walter-cronkite-dead.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/walter-cronkite-dead.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e20115721630e7970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-18T08:50:26-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-18T08:50:26-07:00</updated>
        <summary>I watched Huntley-Brinkley. Except for his Vietnam body counts, I watched very little of Walter Cronkite and have not had the experience of perceiving him to be anything more than an icon of a distant time and place where men...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Domestic Affairs" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>I watched Huntley-Brinkley. </p><p>Except for his Vietnam body counts, I watched very little of Walter Cronkite and have not had the experience of perceiving him to be anything more than an icon of a distant time and place where men were men and the truth was lassooed like a bulldogged calf, wrestled to the ground and branded with the CBS eye. He was just another old white man who spoke good English to me.</p><p>My inspiration came from the likes of Fred Friendly whose aim was ". . . not to make up anybody's mind, but to open minds and to 
make the agony of decision making so intense that you can escape only by thinking." </p><p>Quite frankly I can't imagine at all, that Cronkite made anybody think. Which is I think entirely the point of his celebrity. You opened your craw and swallowed down whatever fish that the grave and erudite Mr Cronkite tossed you. So now he's dead and people are wondering why when we swallow today's fish it stinks and gives us bellyaches. Well what the hell was he doing in 1968? Forming a news hegemony? I think it didn't work. </p><p>The presumption that we can trust news organizations to present expositorily through one talking head, a narrative that will leave us intellectually satisfied, and satisfactorily intelligent is one that is appropriate to the peasantry of any society. So another Cronkite can and will be manufactured and the peasants will settle down. In the meantime, enjoy the New Media while we still have liberty.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/walter-cronkite-dead.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Seven Pounds</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/OaUpxvmY2cI/seven-pounds.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/seven-pounds.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e201157121bd29970c</id>
        <published>2009-07-18T08:34:28-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-18T08:34:28-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Will Smith has managed to become someone completely other than he has ever been on film. Except that he is still a superman and thusly asking us to suspend disbelief once again. Seven Pounds is a tale of awkward dimensions...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Film" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="film" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="hero" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="seven pounds" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="will smith" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Will Smith has managed to become someone completely other than he has ever been on film. Except that he is still a superman and thusly asking us to suspend disbelief once again. Seven Pounds is a tale of awkward dimensions that is poignant, poignant, poignant. It's the next morning and I'm still all worn out from seeing it.</p><p>It is the tale of no exit. Of a man determined to sacrifice himself in the wake of a tragedy that destroys his will to live except to pay a blood debt. It is a supremely arrogant presumption of a world in which no faith brings succor, where only acts of human charity are the acceptable currency, a world devoid of the grace of God. It makes it compelling as hell, and it makes Will Smith christlike. It works in astonishing ways but here I sit the day after unable to comprehend whether I love that or hate it. </p><p>I have no use for tearjerker films although I have no problem crying at films. I do so more than ever in my life at this stage. And the pace of this movie is so unpredictably delicious that I could not outthink the manipulations and second-guess the mood swings of the audio cues. The solo piano never stood for tragedy, the canny lyric never lingered in the mind too long. Seven Pounds is extraordinary drama delivered expressly for film with expert screenwriting and direction. This takes a powerful and simple story through interwoven and cascading vignettes and brings it into narrative focus through a love affair. And it isn't until the final minutes of the film that you realize that the love was entirely accidental tangential to the intent of the protagonist. The acting is very good, superb even, given the necessity of slow revelation. Nobody is allowed much room to be at cross-purposes or have their own dissonance interfere with the focus on Smith, but he delivers in a hugely successful understated manner. This is a film about a man with an all-consuming purpose, it just happens to be one that smashes us to bits as we realize the personal dimensions of it and the reason for it.</p><p>What makes it work so devastatingly well, is that Smith finally finds hope, and a possible escape from his fate. That escape is the love affair that becomes the center of the film's gravity. It is the most heartbreaking feint I have ever seen in any movie.</p><p>The dimension of human tragedy is always a compelling subject. As Will Smith's career matures it is becoming ever more clear that he is drawn to play uniquely heroic characters. He continually faces tragedy in a way that is transcendent. I compare him to three other actors who play heroic roles and he stands out among them for the quality of his choice. Bruce Willis exemplifies a hang-dog determination, an unstoppable ability to go the extra, if obvious, mile.  Denzel Washington stands up to face evil head on with the moral resolve and discipline that is unwavering. Tom Hanks, when he plays a hero, employs an emotional intelligence that makes his path clear, zenlike. Smith now through Seven Pounds after Hancock and I Am Legend and harkening back to I Robot is the purpose-driven hero. A man with a hidden yet undefeatable capacity who must wrestle with the fact that he must walk in human shoes. It is a tangent that his film career could make extraordinary use of, because it is a new kind of hero amidst a sort we may have become immune to.</p><p>Will Smith doesn't bother to get the girl. Instead he goes for the gut. He is an actor who has had quite enough fun as a person, and I get the feeling that he's living right offstage and that directs his willingness to be the beginning character in Seven Pounds. When we meet Ben Thomas, there are several flashes where I can't help but be reminded that Smith's own humble origins would bring him to deal with charitable excess. I easily imagine him to be the Kung Fu Santa Claus of my own personal dreams - a successful figure who can afford to spend his life tracking down people and delivering personal philanthropy, or an ass-kicking, one. Imposing justice man to man - that's the business of a hero. Smith never plays a little man, he plays a big man in little shoes who knows that eventually he's going to have to stop tiptoeing and throw down. The difference between him now and in the Independence Day and Men in Black days, was that he was being outwardly brash. Now he is inwardly brash, but the heroic ends are just as large.</p><p>How many times can it be done? That's hard to say, and it depends on Smith's willingness to tackle some contemporary madness American audiences are hyped about. He has been a cop, how about a small town mayor? How about a bishop? Why not an aid worker? </p><p>I keep thinking of M. Night Shyamalan's style of film when I think of Smith. The mix of natural and supernatural are unsettled in his his world. The ability to surprise is there, but MNS stays in the realm of storytelling for its own sake. Smith is not satisfied with that. That is why he is just a couple roles from being a great American actor.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/seven-pounds.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Still Awestruck</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/gkPU2plQVE0/still-awestruck.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/still-awestruck.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e2011572155902970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-17T00:29:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-18T00:32:01-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Stalin and Hitler were two, enormously gifted and powerful men who led their people to absolute ruin. It's difficult for me to say how wrong they were, but I know that Benedict XVI would have an answer that would satisfy...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Cobb's Diary" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Critical Theory" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Stalin and Hitler were two, enormously gifted and powerful men who led their people to absolute ruin. It's difficult for me to say how wrong they were, but I know that Benedict XVI would have an answer that would satisfy my exacting curiosity. </p><p>I am still awestruck by the degree of calamity that was heaped upon humanity in the disaster that was WW2. I remain in its wake, and I cannot imagine not learning great moral lessons from it until the end of my life. </p><p>Mostly these days, I stand and wonder how much of our economy is real - how much of it would survive the energy and fission another such charismatic could thrust upon our world. We seem to be lacking anyone as large and so we are weak for such a man. </p><p>I spent the afternoon with my brother Doc. We ogled muscle cars in Santa Monica reminding ourselves of our good fortune to have been raised in a time when we looked up and saw astronauts. Today, youth look up and see posters of Bruno. There is a store on the Promenade called Zara, and none of the clothes are made for men our size. The hat vendor's wares fit too tightly on our heads, and people are schlepping around in Smart cars..</p><p>I told my father today at lunch that if every American in the entire bourgeois used flushless toilents and drove hybrid vehicles for the rest of our lives, we'd never stop the climate change initiated by China burning coal for electricity. </p><p>People go to war to protect their children, not to protect the CETA job program. People go to war for blood revenge, not for affordable healthcare or senior centers. People don't go to war for the sake of green vehicles. There aren't any fatheaded Irish brogues playing police sergeants in any of our movies any longer, but there are still similar roughnecks out in the country. They are men who are not handsome or particularly brainy or charming, but they take pride in their ability with a wrench or a shovel. Like the Muslims so many disturbed Americans believe in at bottom in Iraq, they are illiterate, religious, hard working and complete human beings that don't like being pushed around. They will not conform to your idea of a perfectable world, and when you try to take things from them, they will push back. </p><p>How many of these economies of thought are for real?</p><p>You have got to have 2.1 children to grow. If you fall below 1.6 you never come back. So the DINKs are all fleeting. Marry all the metros and other-sexuals you like. It's a false economy. It's unsustainable. It will get overrun, because ultimately, when it comes down to it, people fight. People go to war. </p><p>How much can you destroy in a war when you have the fundamentally wrong idea? How many people can you motivate with a bad philosophy? When it comes to understanding that children are our wealth - we're behind curve of common sense. </p><p>Two young cute women in matching light blue t-shirts beseeched me to feed hungry children someplace in the big old dirty world. I was told that through my donations to their program, I could raise a child for the price of a Pinkberry. This from women who haven't the faintest notion of what labor pains feel like. I wonder if the sponsored villages would go to war for their donations, if the men would take up arms keep those cards and letters coming. I'm not convinced this charitable economy is real. It depends upon mall strollers who feel guilty about eating frozen yogurt.</p><p>Just before I picked up Doc at Fifth and Wall, a slim man stopped in the crosswalk and demanded money from a woman in minivan. I watched how he jutted his head and pointed his fingers. At first I thought he knew the woman, the way he flagged her down. Then I knew better; she handed over two handfulls. I saw him ten minutes later angrily shouting to himself walking parallel to the police station just off Skid Row. You and I know that there are signs on the outdoor malls reminding us that we are under no obligation to pay panhandlers. That's how stupid we have become. And whatever their angle, the charity cases are demanding, and treat us like sheep. </p><p>Most of the time all they need is a dirty face and a cardboard sign, but why not get aggressive?</p><p>The homeless, jobless, faithless don't drag kids around. They're unsustainable too. But the calamity hasn't hit yet. Oh maybe we need two more points on top of the current unemployment figures for the spillover. It might take more. Doc says he knows 40 year old men signing up for military service. You don't get to play around with your so-called rights in the Army, the sergeants don't let you get away with it. </p><p>The best people I have worked with in the computer industry, yes the computer industry, grew up having either served in the Armed Forces, or worked on a farm. There's still a real IT revolution going on - we're learning how to communicate and collaborate and stretch economies into different shapes. But yeah maybe we could live without it. I'm expecting to be in the proper sector. My customer is using my skills to help them save money and work smarter, not upload pictures of their in-laws or send 140 character messages. So maybe we could live without 40% of the business, just like we're all learning to live with 9 million new cars sold per year, down from 16 million. You just don't upgrade so quickly. </p><p>So what happens when people save money and the economy just doesn't grow? The unsustainable sectors disappear. Like Enron. Like Hitler's Sixth Army under Paulus at Stalingrad. Like other large ideas with bad philosophies underneath them. </p><p>I'm at the end of The Hitler Book. Just for the description of how he died in Berlin with his world unraveling, it was well worth the effort. Hitler's ultimate failure was long and slow and agonizing. I'm still awestruck by how many millions can die in vain. I still can't
get over the fact that so many of us think we're immune.</p><p /></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/still-awestruck.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>It's Official: The No Excuses Era</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/TkLDVFvuePA/its-official-the-no-excuses-era.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/its-official-the-no-excuses-era.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e20115721051fb970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-16T19:28:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-16T19:28:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Barack Obama is nothing if not predictable. What's interesting is that he carries all of the baggage with him up front. You can smell it coming and watch all the people who were destined to be stunned, be stunned. And...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Brain Spew" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Barack Obama is nothing if not predictable. What's interesting is that he carries all of the baggage with him up front. You can smell it coming and watch all the people who were destined to be stunned, be stunned. And of course all the people who were destined to be offended, etc. Obama has proven to be, in my opinion, a great litmus test for American credulity. </p><br /><div>Several months ago, I predicted <a href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2008/07/whats-your-excu.html">the dawn of the No Excuses Era</a>. I suppose it required a trip to the NAACP for people to take notice of the truth, and so it is more obvious than ever. Let's see who grasps the implications:<br /><br /><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">The problem with this and all black role modeling. Only people with racial hangups need black role models. And only people who want to affect people with racial hangups want to be black role models. It is one of the great temptations of my class of folks, those formerly known as the Talented Tenth.<br /><br />See if you were Talented Tenth, then you already know about a litany of black role models, because you study prior role models with a bit of envy and a bit of spite. If you buy into what I call the role monkey circus, then you already know that somehow you have to overcome the same demons you intend to chase out of your followers. So you might start during Black History Month with Carter G. Woodson and get enough inspiration from him for you to be a beacon to others. And basically you need enough self-esteem to assume the task, that plus the initiative taken on Woodson, and an opportunity to play show and tell. Bam, instant role model. Do it enough times for enough media and you become a 'black leader'.  Do it in a calculatedly brilliant way in front of all America in the political arena and you might even become Barack Obama. But the underlying premise never changes, you're a show off in front of people who don't have the courage and demon-shields to do for self.<br /><br />In life, success has many faces and is hard to define, failure is easy to define. It whatever successful people have power to 'empower' and decide you ain't got it. Rights are the gift of the strong, and sometimes the strong aren't generous.<br /><br /></div>So this is pure role monkey circus and Obama is saying what the Talented Tenth has been itching to say for a while. No Excuses. Obama thinks he has nothing to prove to anybody, and to the NAACP crowd he's exactly right. He's not beholden to the Civil Rights Establishment or the Grass Roots. Something that was made very clear when he dissed Uncle Smiley and a host of other wannabe black leaders, including his own minister. Now he's demonstrating that once again big time with some rhetoric from the hip which illustrates exactly how much he has learned since being a community organizer. That stuff is only good for getting votes, but that's just a mediocre hustle. <br /><br />The Big Time is where Obama has a lot to prove - when he deals with the ass end of a standing trillion dollar deficit, and on that scale the struggles of little black boys and little black girls don't add up to a hill of beans in this crazy world. <br /><br />When I get some free time, I'm going to compare Obama's address to GW Bush's. That should be more fun than a barrel of monkeys. In the meantime, read all of Obama's "you're on your own" rhetoric like you should: The well is empty and that fiction y'all call black politics ain't going to deliver squat. <br /></div></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/its-official-the-no-excuses-era.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Thursday Fragments</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/IFkyz0F5YMo/thursday-fragments.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/thursday-fragments.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e20115720d6f1d970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-16T06:55:40-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-16T06:55:25-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Despising the Sensible Well, boy howdy was I wrong. Then again I was just speculating while giving the benefit of the doubt to Congressional Democrats complaining about last week's attempt to jumpstart Bush Derangement Syndrome. My bad. It turns out...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Fragments" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; " /></p><div style="padding-top: 7px; padding-right: 7px; padding-bottom: 7px; padding-left: 7px; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/1.22 arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: small; "><p><strong>Despising the Sensible</strong><br />Well, boy howdy was I wrong. Then again I was just speculating while giving the benefit of the doubt to Congressional Democrats complaining about last week's attempt to jumpstart Bush Derangement Syndrome. My bad.</p><div>It turns out that the big old secret program the CIA supposedly was operating was based on a Presidential finding. And of course all Presidential Findings find their way to Congress and so the appropriate committees were briefed. Not only that, the program never actually did anything. Watch the video about it all <a href="http://www.blackfive.net/main/2009/07/in-the-crosshairs-congressional-assassins.html">here</a>.</div><br /></div><div style="padding-top: 7px; padding-right: 7px; padding-bottom: 7px; padding-left: 7px; background-color: #ffffff; font: normal normal normal 13px/1.22 arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif; font-family: 'Trebuchet MS', Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: small; "><strong>Carlin Explains It All For You (Through David Brooks)</strong><br /><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; "><span style="font-family: 'Trebuchet MS'; font-size: 13px; line-height: 15px; ">Dan Carlin has just expounded on David Brooks and explained to his large audience the basic principle of skepticism that is at the heart of the kind of Republicanism I subscribe to. Don't trust the government to solve your problems. He explains it all <a href="http://www.dancarlin.com/disp.php/csarchive#Show-155---The-Big-Rushed-Show" style="color: blue; text-decoration: underline; cursor: pointer; ">here</a>.</span></span></div><p /></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/thursday-fragments.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Paragraph 56</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/1mrG1Lp7Oew/paragraph-56.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/paragraph-56.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e2011571f94777970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-12T10:20:37-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-12T10:50:31-07:00</updated>
        <summary>56. The Christian religion and other religions can offer their contribution to development only if God has a place in the public realm, specifically in regard to its cultural, social, economic, and particularly its political dimensions. The Church's social doctrine...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Matters of the Spirit" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> 56. The Christian religion and other religions can offer their contribution 
to development <em>only if God has a place in the public realm</em>, specifically 
in regard to its cultural, social, economic, and particularly its political 
dimensions. The Church's social doctrine came into being in order to claim 
“citizenship status” for the Christian religion<a href="http://www.newadvent.org/library/caritas-in-veritate.htm#_edn135" name="_ednref135" />. Denying the right 
to profess one's religion in public and the right to bring the truths of faith 
to bear upon public life has negative consequences for true development. The 
exclusion of religion from the public square — and, at the other extreme, 
religious fundamentalism — hinders an encounter between persons and their 
collaboration for the progress of humanity. Public life is sapped of its 
motivation and politics takes on a domineering and aggressive character. Human 
rights risk being ignored either because they are robbed of their transcendent 
foundation or because personal freedom is not acknowledged. Secularism and 
fundamentalism exclude the possibility of fruitful dialogue and effective 
cooperation between reason and religious faith.<em> Reason always stands in need 
of being purified by faith</em>: this also holds true for political reason, which 
must not consider itself omnipotent. For its part,<em> religion always needs to 
be purified by reason </em>in order to show its authentically human face. Any 
breach in this dialogue comes only at an enormous price to human development.</p><p>-- <a href="http://www.newadvent.org/library/caritas-in-veritate.htm">Benedict XVI</a></p><p><br />This is why I am Catholic. The Church speaks to me and offers me the whole of its knowledge, embracing all of human experience, directed by the unifying voice of the Pope. It works to unite me with God recognizing that as a full human being I require more than blind acceptance and unconsidered submission. The Church intrinsically defends my freedom by recognizing all of my capacities and needs and points my way to human self-realization on it's only path - towards God.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/paragraph-56.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Despising the Unknowable</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/tHpcEiaEj5M/despising-the-unknowable.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/despising-the-unknowable.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e2011571f862f1970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-12T02:40:03-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-12T02:40:03-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Down this way in Miller's Alley, we don't get bent out of shape over things we cannot control. So it goes without saying that it's not bloody likely that we're going to make a big deal over something we can't...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Security and Paranoia" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Down this way in Miller's Alley, we don't get bent out of shape over things we cannot control. So it goes without saying that it's not bloody likely that we're going to make a big deal over something we can't even see. Yet the firestorm heading this way over the fact that Dick Cheney is involved with a still secret CIA anti-terrorist program has got people freaking out left and right.</p><p>It's all a matter of trust.</p><p>I trust Dick Cheney because I read his biography, and I determined that I found his character admirable. I understand very well that the man lost much sleep over concern for American safety from terror. It's true that the government has had a heavy hand in much we might have handled for ourselves. In the same way we tend to discount the effectiveness of color-coded warnings at the airports, we Americans are ready to look after our own safety. We know that we have our own back, but does Cheney have it? For all of us, he did, but only half of us believed him. Those of us that did would still have been fine, for the most part, if he said we were primarily responsible. </p><p>I suspect that the secret CIA program is domestic spying above and beyond the whole FISA envelope. My guess is that the CIA took over or co-opted the infamous Carnivore and ran botnets. But that's just wild speculation. My other guess is that it might have something to do with other secret sites that were built after the first set of secret sites were closed and as such were involved in reditions. But whatever it was that the CIA did, domestically or otherwise, one cannot prove much right now. It means that the Left and Democrats will have to jumpstart an entirely new sort of diatribe. Civil liberties can't be the subtext, nor can international relations. Whatever it is, coming out on Obama's watch, it is fundamentally unproductive to drag Cheney or Congressional oversight through the mud.</p><p>It seems to me that the only way to win is on one extreme or another. Squelch the entire matter, or expose it 100% Of course that would be logical. So long as there is some way to squeeze an emotion out of the American public, there will be an illogical political win inherent in this matter. This undermines the confidence that logical Americans have in their own politics.</p><p>The terrorists win</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/despising-the-unknowable.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Only the Lonely</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/BWZR/~3/IoRRk1svpfA/only-the-lonely.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/only-the-lonely.html" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834515ae969e2011571f4f872970b</id>
        <published>2009-07-11T09:54:19-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-11T10:05:44-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This morning I'm doing a blackness tour in my online reading. Same old stuff. Feeling a pinch odd that I could be hanging with Jimi at The Root if I tried and cared enough. Kind of pissed that I may...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Cobb</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Critical Theory" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This morning I'm doing a blackness tour in my online reading. Same old stuff. Feeling a pinch odd that I could be hanging with Jimi at The Root if I tried and cared enough. Kind of pissed that I may have become perennially difficult to understand and thus always something of an outsider. Wondering how long I can do it all without becoming a caricature of myself. I mean, I don't have to make any excuses about sleeping with little boys or hitting the crack pipe, but then again I'm not Michael Jackson or Marion Barry. If I were to hype up the Cobb personna I could get away with being perverse. The thing is, I'm not perverse, I'm actually just achieving knowledge and some wisdom at an accellerated pace. It makes me move on.</p><p>So <a href="http://www.prometheus6.org/node/24694#comments">the subject at P6 is Martha's Vineyard</a> and which section the Obamas might find most comfy for their summer vacation. The same-old is the same, 'it doesn't matter how rich you get...' observation that their likely choice will be Oak Bluffs, the ink-welliest spot on the isle. </p><p>My favorite parts of the Vineyard are Menemsha Bight, West Chop and the Katama beaches south of Edgartown. I hadn't made it out to Gay Head, but would prefer that because I don't see what the point of living on the water is if you can't see the sunset. To <a href="http://nymag.com/guides/summer/2009/57472/">read the NYMagazine article</a> that spurred all this talk, there is a distinct racial geography to the joint and social and psychological incentives not to buck the trend.</p><p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">The Only Ones deal with glass ceilings at work, unfortunate
misunderstandings in their neighborhoods, condescension from blacks who
think their education or class makes them inauthentic, and identity
crises in their kids. When they get to their Vineyard vacation homes,
they want to escape that casual, institutional, and intra-black racism
and be around people who help them feel less anomalous. Trey Ellis, who
wrote the script for <em>The Inkwell, </em>the notoriously bad film
about the black Vineyard experience (Ellis himself called it terrible),
says, “The black part of the Vineyard is like, I would imagine, being
gay and going to the Castro. It’s this mecca where you can be yourself
and be with people who have so much in common with you. No one has to
feign some street cred when they’re playing tennis.” It’s a source of
communion and of pride. “When you see a beautiful black family with
their kids, it makes you feel really good about being black,” says
Chrisette Hudlin, wife of Reggie and a lifelong Vineyarder who travels
there every summer from L.A. “As a person who’s high-achieving and
striving for the best for their family, you’re looking at these other
black people who have the same goals, and it makes you feel good as a
black person. You don’t feel out of place.” Several Only Ones say
there’s nowhere in America that makes them more proud of black people.</p>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 



 

 
	<p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;" /><p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">This
is particularly true among parents, who talk about the importance of
introducing their children to other black upper-class families so they
can know they’re not as peculiar as they might feel. “Black kids need
to be around successful black families, because other blacks from
humble beginnings want you to apologize for being successful,” says
psychiatrist Carlotta Miles. “On the Vineyard, you don’t need excuses
or self-consciousness or defensiveness.” Drew Dixon Williams grew up in
Washington, D.C., where her mother, Sharon Pratt, served as mayor, and
she spent summers on the island. “It’s sort of embarrassing to say
this, coming from Washington,” she says, “but I used to say with a
straight face—because I was too young to know better—that I would get
my black experience on Martha’s Vineyard. I didn’t have to be defensive
about not being black enough or being black in the first place. We were
all from <em>The Cosby Show.</em>”</p><p>Only Ones. I'm not sure that I don't like that. There have got to be more OOs like me, who tend not to break a sweat over our OO factor. But I hear what Drew Dixon Williams is saying. The thing is that I don't particularly care a great deal about my kids' black experience. I'm not trying to psychologically prepare a racial Maginot Line in their consciousness in defense of <a href="http://www.theroot.com/buzz/some-pools-still-waters-run-deep">The Insult</a>. There is no Black Experience(tm). There used to be one, but an old man died with the recipe, and now everybody thinks they have it right - like the drama over the recipe for the perfect hamburger. Sometimes it's better to just have a hot dog and call it a day.</p><p>But there was a time when I thought I was a Big Mac in my odd situation of being in the black upper middle class all by my lonesome, which was to say 30 and single and trying to pull the perfect babe. The rarefied atmosphere of Oak Bluffs was exactly what I was looking for - a bunch of Cosby kids looking for another bunch. And yet I still needed to play volleyball, because that's what I did. And so when I did that, I ended up at Katama among kids who didn't work. I mean to say white kids who shuttled between the Vineyard and Palm Beach depending on the season. Trust funders, social specimens to us in the real world, or at least that was my assumption at the time. But back in Oak Bluffs, the more urban setting, last whites night (as in post Labor Day dress codes) resulted in more <a href="http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2008/09/party-over-here.html">dancing in suits</a>, the same phenomenon I had grown ill of years before. </p><p>The irony was that when I came to the East Coast originally, having broke up with my progressive girlfriend, there was a great expectation in me that I would find in New York the very equivalent of a dense, upscale black community on whose margins I could dance my New World Afrikan dance. In the advanced bohemian brashness I considered my pose to be, I could speak to the artistic expression doctors, lawyers, stockbrokers and sportos could not approach without being so crass as the lot of entertainers we suffered in the degrading state of hiphop. I wanted the audience of the new black progressive novel, the people who went to BAM and who dug Wynton. I wanted the people who were looking for the creative blacks now unleashed parallel to Spike Lee who would inherit the mantel of August Wilson without caving into what eventually became the Black WB. It was a narrow ledge that needed broad support, and it turned out that there was little such concentration in the Big Apple. Deciding against all that after a couple frustrating years in recognition that ex-gangsta drug dealers and their coteries were bankrolling all the new black cultural production, I was too through with it all. By the time I got to the Vineyard, it John Singleton and Terry McMillan were the king and queen of black highbrow which was all actually just middlebrow, and the likes of George C. Wolfe belonged to... well the same people who made The Blue Man Group rich. What we got was Diddy, Dre &amp; Jay Z. Three new Barry Gordys living three times as large. What we didn't get was one theatre on Broadway or playwrites to replace Jones or Hansberry, no new Paul Robeson or Leontyne Price.</p><p>That little black community simply wasn't wealthy enough, and I think today it probably still is not. And so I predict that it never will be because none of us will survive the inflation of the post-Obama world who aren't already wealthy today. The hamburger will stay hamburger and never move to the black cultural filet mignon of my dreams. Not a raisin in the sun, but a jerky beef that produces hard little turds of frustration no matter how much water you drink it down with. Mine is all shat out, but it took years to comprehend both the size and cost of this failure. In the end I have to live with our history, of having Michael Jackson's death celebrated as if he were our new black shining prince.</p><p>The fool's errand is pumping the old fighter of blackness full of steroids and painkillers to fight another round of the Culture Wars. And you wonder why a people who should have found quite enough in their humanity or even Christianity generations ago are still tied to minding the color line and carving out discursive space around Obama, the Great Black Avatar. As if he could be. </p><p>This morning I read that the NSA is building a new data center just south of Salt Lake City. I think I could retire there in 15 and do some consulting until my fingers become too arthritic, white as that joint might be. Still, I'd prefer Boise, where at least they drink vodka openly. Nevertheless I pause to think of all the undiscovered countries too non-black for the OO taste not to mention that of the average middle class black Americans. I understand the desire to perfect a black aesthetic which stands above the dysfunctional fray of the multifarious legacies of slavery, and racial brownian motion of American society. I understand my generation's deep desire to accomplish the Beloved Community, to have an unassailable elite black vanguard with the social clout of the voice of Thurgood Marshall in the wake of the Brown decision - all black Americans backing him no matter their class status. But nothing is so monolithic and sure. Rather we are black mothers and fathers to Benjamin Buttons whose adventures lie in foreign lands beyond our experience. It's good enough to make home right, a home right with God. </p><p>The Only Ones, those who deign to be that and stay that, would be a lonely bunch. As <a href="http://blog.stevenpressfield.com/ep-1/">Steven Pressfield says</a>, a tribe has no law so much as it has a code of honor.  America and the West are not tribal, but black Americans are perhaps the last tribe here, still trying to get it all together. Looking for unity in all the wrong places, as victims, as leaders, in the meritocracy, in the rarified moral arena of our stentorian politics. Everywhere we are reminded that our code of honor stands for jack in the social marketplace. It's only the head bob on the street, the appropriated high five, pound and now fist bump all forever lost to the leveling heat sink of transparent American culture. Nobody cares enough to learn Swahili and so the heat death of black American culture is inevitable. It can only be sustained by physical proximity and along the same lines of fear and distrust as Jim Crow ever established. </p><p>The distinction of being from the best and brightest of these, the least of my brothers, is being played out now, five steps over my head in Obama's house. His election was the last leverage our black social capital will ever aggregate. We'll go down finally, like the Irish after Kennedy. And no fat headed, thick accented brothers of our sort will remain stock characters in our popular entertainments and consciousness. There will be no future Charlie Rangels just as there are no future Tip ONeils. There will only be the same-old, the dialog that becomes a lonely monologue. <br /> </p><p /></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://cobb.typepad.com/cobb/2009/07/only-the-lonely.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
