<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Aerospace (DO-178B) Software</title>
    
    <link rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-1260618</id>
    <updated>2009-12-21T18:59:36+00:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Explore the world of Aerospace Software </subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/typepad/amitabhmukherjee/aerospace_software" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
        <title>Verification Effort</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/amitabhmukherjee/aerospace_software/~3/vv4Fb_0_cSs/verification-effort.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/verification-effort.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341e1f8c53ef0128767189e5970c</id>
        <published>2009-12-21T18:59:36+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-21T18:59:36+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Verification has a place in the software scheme of things. That is undeniable. But the effort one needs to put into verification is not emphasised enough. The problem with verification is that if an error goes undetected in one of...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Amitabh Mukherjee</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="DO-178B" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Verification and Validation" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/verification-effort.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>How to reduce (at least) one DO-178B Document</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/amitabhmukherjee/aerospace_software/~3/GvFKa1A5mK0/how-to-reduce-at-least-one-do178b-document.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/how-to-reduce-at-least-one-do178b-document.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341e1f8c53ef0120a74f6176970b</id>
        <published>2009-12-14T16:27:25+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-14T16:28:30+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Quiz time!! Which of the following SW Plans are not required to be produced? a) Plan for Software Aspects of Certification (PSAC) b) Software Development Plan (SDP) c) Software Verification Plan (SVP) d) Software Configuration Management Plan (SCMP) e) Software...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Amitabh Mukherjee</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="DO-178B" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/how-to-reduce-at-least-one-do178b-document.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Verification Tool Qualification</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/amitabhmukherjee/aerospace_software/~3/bOIipNaNVq4/verification-tool-qualification.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/verification-tool-qualification.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341e1f8c53ef0120a73d7047970b</id>
        <published>2009-12-10T14:53:26+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-10T15:00:28+00:00</updated>
        <summary>This post is in response to a request by Pradeep. The issue is important enough to deserve a separate post. I will only touch upon the important aspects of verification tool qualification here. For more details you obviously will need...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Amitabh Mukherjee</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="DO-178B" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Verification and Validation" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/verification-tool-qualification.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Systems and Hardware Standards</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/amitabhmukherjee/aerospace_software/~3/_ghDR-wgyDM/systems-and-hardware-standards.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/systems-and-hardware-standards.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341e1f8c53ef01287604140a970c</id>
        <published>2009-12-03T00:38:18+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-03T00:38:18+00:00</updated>
        <summary>This information might be trivial for most of you, but I thought it is worth putting them together somewhere. Even if it is just for my reference. But first a small preamble: DO-178B records that “At the time of publication...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Amitabh Mukherjee</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="DO-178B" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/12/systems-and-hardware-standards.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Estimating Verification Effort</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/typepad/amitabhmukherjee/aerospace_software/~3/E188_cstsww/estimating-verification-effort.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/11/estimating-verification-effort.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341e1f8c53ef0120a6ef064e970b</id>
        <published>2009-11-30T14:49:02+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-30T14:49:02+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Continuing on estimation techniques ... Have you estimated the time and effort it will require to complete verification for your project? Sure? Now go ahead and double the effort. Most of the DO-178B projects fail as the effort of verification...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Amitabh Mukherjee</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="DO-178B" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Project Management" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Verification and Validation" />
        
        


    <feedburner:origLink>http://aerospacesoftware.typepad.com/aerospace_software/2009/11/estimating-verification-effort.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
