The Hardin Library will be closed for all home Iowa football games. The 24-hour study will be available to University of Iowa affiliates with an Iowa OneCard or UIHC badge.

Closed:

• Aug. 30 
• Sept.13
• Sept. 27
• Oct. 18
• Oct. 25
• Nov. 15
• Nov. 22

Hardin Library hours

The University of Iowa Libraries offers a range of mobile apps for clinical care affiliates at no cost. See the full list here.

• UpToDate Mobile is an evidence-based clinical resource that synthesizes multiple sources.
• DynaMed Mobile is similar to UpToDate but rates level of evidence for treatments (and it’s a Hardin staff favorite).
• Access Mobile (medicine, pharmacy, and surgery) includes Diagnosaurus, Pocket Guide to Diagnostic Tests, and more.
• BMJ Best Practice is for decision support.
• ClinicalKey mobile provides access to Elsevier medical books and journals and more.
• Stat!Ref Mobile provides cross-searching evidence-based and point-of-care resources.
• VisualDx Mobile is a differential diagnosis tool with images and point-of-care information.

If you need help getting started with mobile resources, request a workshop in Mobile Resources or contact your specialist librarian.

EndNote 2025 is now available for University of Iowa faculty, staff, graduate and professional students, residents, and fellows. Below, you can see the new features that we think are relevant to your work and research.

• AI- powered summaries 

• Find a Journal tool helps users find the right journal for their article

• Cite from PDFs 

• Improvements to Find Full Text 

• More integration with Web of Science 

Find more information about these key features from Clarivate. Clarivate also provides online training. The UI Libraries also offers a research guide with EndNote and other citation tools. If you need help getting started with EndNote, or would like help with advanced features, please contact your librarian. We’re here to help you succeed!

It’s July and time for a beloved week in television: Shark Week. These sleek, weird, and beautiful apex predators are mesmerizing and also a little terrifying. But what do sharks have to do with medicine?

Surprisingly, quite a bit—thanks to Elementorum myologiae specimen [A Sample of the Elements of Myology] (1667), a work by 17th-century Danish physician, geologist, and Catholic bishop Niels Steensen (Latinized as Nicolaus Steno). His life and work gave us the anatomical-geological mashup we didn’t know we needed.

Born in Copenhagen in 1638, Steensen’s early life was marked by fragility and curiosity. Surviving a mysterious illness of his own at age three, he grew up during a time of plague. The 1654–1655 outbreak claimed 240 of his schoolmates, a tragedy that likely shaped his deep interest in the natural world.

Educated in the classical sciences, Steensen wasn’t one to accept inherited wisdom. By 1659, he was already challenging long-held beliefs, questioning everything from the origin of tears to the nature of fossils.

Steensen began his medical studies at the University of Copenhagen. Encouraged by his anatomy professor Thomas Bartholin, he set off across Europe to study with the best minds of the time. His journey took him from Rostock to Amsterdam, Leiden, France, and finally Italy.

In Amsterdam he studied under Gerhard Blasius. There, he made his first major discovery: the parotid salivary duct, now known as the Stensen duct. His meticulous dissections of animal heads revealed previously unknown structures, culminating in his 1662 publication Observationes anatomicae, which redefined the anatomy of the salivary glands.

His anatomical work didn’t stop there. While studying cow hearts, Steensen came to a radical conclusion: the heart, long thought to be the seat of the soul and source of innate heat, was simply a muscle. In De musculis et glandulis (1664), building on William Harvey’s De motu cordis (1628), he boldly declared, “The heart…is nothing more than muscle,” challenging centuries of Galenic and Aristotelian doctrine.

It was in Italy in 1666 that Steensen had a fateful encounter with a shark. This moment would deepen his anatomical studies and spark a new scientific passion that helped lay the foundations of modern geology.

A massive shark was caught near Livorno, and its head was sent to Steensen by order of Grand Duke Ferdinando II de’ Medici. During the dissection, Steensen noticed something striking: the shark’s teeth looked exactly like “tongue-stones”—fossilized objects found far inland, long believed to be petrified dragon tongues. This observation sparked a new obsession: geology.

Steensen’s genius lay in his ability to connect disciplines. His insight—that fossils were once-living organisms embedded in rock—led to foundational principles in geology. In De solido intra solidum naturaliter contento (1669), he laid out ideas that remain central to the field today, including the law of superposition and the concept that Earth’s layers tell a readable history.

Despite his scientific achievements, Steensen’s life took a spiritual turn. In 1675, he became a Catholic priest and later a bishop. He served in various cities across northern Germany, embracing a life of poverty and religious devotion. He died in Schwerin in 1686 at just 48 years old. In 1953, during a canonization process, his remains were exhumed, though his cranium was mysteriously missing. In 1998, Pope John Paul II beatified him, honoring both his piety and his scientific legacy.

Our copy of Elementorum myologiae specimen is bound in limp vellum over paper boards. The cover has contracted over time, giving it a pronounced bow. The text block is made of sturdy paper with minimal foxing or staining. A few sections remain unopened at the top, untouched since the 17th century. And the smell? A sweet, cheesy aroma that might sound off-putting, but is oddly pleasant.

∼FIN∼

TENO, NICOLAUS (1638-1686). Elementorum myologiae specimen. Printed in Florence by “the printing house under the sign of the Star“, 1667. 25 cm tall.

Contact the John Martin Rare Book Room curator, Damien Ihrig, to see this book at damien-ihrig@uiowa.edu or 319-335-9154.

Benjamin Bell (1749–1806), a pioneering Scottish surgeon and father of the Edinburgh school of surgery, authored A Treatise on the Hydrocele, on Sarcocele, or Cancer, and Other Diseases of the Testes (1791). Known for his rational, scientific approach to surgery, Bell also wrote the influential A System of Surgery (1783–1788). He was closely connected with leading medical minds of his time, including Alexander Monro secundus, John Hunter, and Percivall Pott.

Born in Dumfries, Scotland, Bell was the eldest of 15 children. Thanks to his father’s modest wealth, he studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh under renowned teachers like Monro, Joseph Black, and John Hope. He later expanded his training in London and Paris, where he was inspired by Joseph Priestley’s scientific lecture at the Royal Society.

Bell’s surgical innovations included his “save skin” principle, which improved healing in procedures like mastectomies and amputations. He also championed the use of opium for post-operative pain relief—an early advocate for patient comfort.

His legacy extended beyond his writings. His great-grandson, Joseph Bell, became a legendary diagnostician whose keen observational skills inspired Arthur Conan Doyle’s creation of Sherlock Holmes.

Bell’s 1791 A Treatise… was written in response to requests for more detail on testicular diseases, a topic he had briefly covered in his earlier work. The book explores the anatomy, pathology, and surgical treatment of testicular conditions, including hydrocele and cancer. Though it lacks procedural illustrations—a common critique—it reflects Bell’s deep engagement with contemporary medical research across Britain, Europe, and America. Written in a clear, accessible style, it includes numerous references to other studies and cases.

Appropriately enough, we have two copies of A Treatise…, both providing a peek into book production at this time. The first has its original paper covers with many of the textblock sections unopened. Although originally covered in brown leather over paper boards, the other copy is in much worse shape. The leather has been removed from a substantial portion of the covers, the spine is almost entirely missing, and the front board has detached. Our Conservation and Collections Care team has stabilized both books with boxes, though, so we should be able to keep using them for centuries to come.

BELL, BENJAMIN (1749–1806). A treatise on the hydrocele, on sarcocele, or cancer, and other diseases of the testes. Printed in Edinburgh by Bell & Bradfute etc., 1794. Two copies: 23 and 22 cm tall.

Contact the John Martin Rare Book Room Curator Damien Ihrig at damien-ihrig@uiowa.edu or 319-335-9154 to see these books in person or virtually.

This month, we highlight a book from the early 19th-century French physician who created the most iconic symbol of healthcare providers around the world. Assessing the condition of a patient in 1816, René Laënnec (1781–1826), rolled up a piece of paper to create a crude cone and proceeded to listen to the patient’s chest sounds. Thus was born the stethoscope (from the Greek, stethos:chest and skopé:examination).

Along with the stethoscope, he advanced the understanding of peritonitis and coined the term “cirrhosis” to describe the liver’s tawny appearance. He was the first to lecture on melanoma, describing its spread to the lungs and naming it “melanose.”

In 1819, he published De l’auscultation médiate, ou Traité du diagnostic des maladies des poumons et du coeur [On mediate auscultation, or a treatise on the diagnosis of diseases of the lungs and heart], a landmark work that identified a range of chest sounds—rales, rhonchi, crepitance, egophony—and distinguished between normal and pathological breath sounds. His work transformed the physical exam from an art of intuition into a science of precision.

After some early opposition to his invention, De l’auscultation médiate and the stethoscope would take off, quickly spreading throughout Europe and the U.S.

Laënnec’s early life was shaped by loss and frailty. At just five years old, he lost his mother to tuberculosis—a disease that would haunt both his family and his future. After the death of his mother, Laënnec’s father sent him to live with his uncle, Dr. Guillaume-François Laënnec, the dean of the medical faculty at the University of Nantes. Despite chronic illness—likely asthma—and frequent fevers, young Laënnec was intellectually gifted and artistically inclined.

While at Nantes, he studied music, carved wooden instruments, and wrote poetry. By age 14, he was already assisting in patient care at the Hôtel-Dieu in Nantes, and by age 18, he was a third-class surgeon at the city’s military hospital.

Encouraged by his uncle and undeterred by his father’s objections to pursuing medicine as a career, Laënnec studied medicine in Paris. There, he trained under some of the era’s most celebrated physicians, including Jean-Nicolas Corvisart-Desmarets, Xavier Bichat, and Guillaume Dupuytren.

Already somewhat frail from his chronic illness, Laënnec further declined after beginning his practice. Medical school and his research had exposed him to numerous tuberculotic patients and cadavers. By 1814, his poor health forced him to return to Brittany to recover in the quiet countryside.

In 1816, Laënnec returned to Paris to take over as the chief of Necker Hospital. It was there that he continued his research into chest diseases and was inspired to create the stethoscope. Prior to his invention, the standard practice for attempting to observe chest sounds was direct auscultation—placing an ear directly on the chest of the patient.

Laënnec appreciated the information that could be assessed through direct auscultation, but not the discomfort and embarrassment it caused both the patient and the physician. It also had its limitations. Laënnec was growing frustrated when inspiration struck. His musical training, woodcarving, and (perhaps apocryphally) recalling a children’s game where someone scratches one end of a tube, sending sounds to another child listening at the other end, combined to create a vision of a listening tube applied to the patient’s chest.

Putting his idea into practice, he quickly rolled up some paper, creating an approximation of a cone. He placed one end of the cone on the patient’s chest and the other to his ear. Voila! A symphony of chest sounds. The musically inclined Laënnec eventually carved a wooden tube with a fluted opening on one end and an earpiece on the other.

As his health continued to fail, in 1824, Laënnec’s nephew examined him, listening to his chest with a stethoscope, and diagnosed him with tuberculosis. In the summer of 1826, Laënnec fell into a coma and died on August 13. His now-famous stethoscope he bequeathed to his nephew.

As mentioned, De l’auscultation médiate is a two-volume set. Our copy is in great shape. Both volumes are covered in blue and black marbled paper, and the fore-edge has a lovely dark blue and black speckling. Although the paper isn’t of the highest quality, it has held up well, with only minor foxing and staining. Not surprisingly, the four folded illustrations in the back of volume one have taken the most abuse and are in the roughest shape (although still sturdy and usable).

LAËNNEC, RENÉ (1781–1826). De l’auscultation médiate, ou Traité du diagnostic des maladies des poumons et du coeur. Printed in Paris by J.-A. Brosson et J.-S. Chaudé, 1819. 23 cm tall.

Contact the John Martin Rare Book Room Curator Damien Ihrig at damien-ihrig@uiowa.edu or 319-335-9154 to see these books in-person or virtually.

We present William Paul Crillon Barton’s (1786–1856) masterwork, Vegetable materia medica of the United States (1817–1818). Barton was a well-known naval surgeon, medical botanist, artist, and professor. He was born on Nov. 17, 1786, in Philadelphia, to a family filled with people who made important contributions to every aspect of the early United States. Barton had both the opportunities and the drive to make his own impact on the new nation.

Growing up, Barton must have heard many stories of his great-uncle, the astronomer, cartographer, inventor, and clockmaker David Rittenhouse (who also became Barton’s grandfather-in-law after Barton married his cousin, Esther). Barton’s father, William, wrote the definitive biography of David Rittenhouse and helped to design the Great Seal of the United States, most famous now for its ubiquity on U.S. dollars and as a plot device in the National Treasure movie.

His uncle, Benjamin Barton, was a well-known physician and botanist whom Barton would eventually study under. And his brother, John Barton, pioneered corrective osteotomy for joint ankylosis and invented the Barton bandage and Barton forceps.

William Barton spent most of his career in the Navy as a surgeon and administrator, eventually working his way up to the head of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, the precursor to the Navy Surgeon General. However, he never lost his love of medicinal plants and eventually published the beautifully illustrated Vegetable Materia Medica, the first U.S. botanical work published with colored plates.

Read below to learn more about the John Martin Rare Book Room’s copy of Vegetable Materia Medica, Barton’s friend (frenemy?) and fellow plant enthusiast Jacob Bigelow, and how Barton played a role in presidential case law.

BARTON, WILLIAM P. C. (1786–1856). Vegetable materia medica of the United States. Two volumes. Printed in Philadelphia by M. Carey & Son, 1817–1818. 28 cm tall.

Barton attended Princeton University and graduated in 1805. While at Princeton, as was customary for all undergrads, he took the name of a celebrated individual—Count Paul Crillon—and kept the initials P. C. for life. [Interestingly, the only Paul Crillon that Damien Ihrigh, curator of the JMRBR, could find information on is the alias for the French spy and con artist, Paul Émile Soubiran, whose scheming helped hasten the start of the War of 1812—and earned him a pile of cash.]

Barton then studied medicine at the University of Pennsylvania under his uncle, Benjamin Barton, who wrote the first American botanical textbook. This sparked Barton’s lifelong interest in botany and desire to publish an illustrated medical botany book devoted to American plant species.

Barton graduated in 1808 with his medical degree. His dissertation on nitrous oxide gas, which included an illustration of a man inhaling “laughing gas,” was influential at a time when such experiments were often mocked.

At age 23, Barton joined the U.S. Navy as a surgeon. He worked to improve medical supplies on ships and pushed for the use of lemons and limes to prevent scurvy, even before the Navy recognized the importance of antiscorbutic (term used in the 18th and 19th centuries for foods known to prevent scurvy) treatments for vitamin C deficiencies developed at sea.

In 1811, Congress established the first naval hospitals, and Barton, ever the stickler for best practices and a properly functioning supply chain, was asked to draft regulations for them. He proposed detailed rules and regulations and was the first to advocate for the hiring of female nurses for the Navy.

He advocated for the U.S. to follow the British model for naval medical facilities, including that all property should be marked with a special designation to prevent theft. From that point forward, all Naval medical supplies were marked “U.S. Naval Hospital.”

After his uncle’s death in 1815, Barton became a professor of botany at the University of Pennsylvania. He also taught at Thomas Jefferson Medical College and served as its dean from 1828 to 1829. He also helped develop the Philadelphia Naval Hospital, the first home for the Naval Academy. By 1824, Barton was appointed to the board that examined Navy surgeon candidates, and in 1830, he became the commanding officer at the Naval Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia.

It was during his time at Penn and the Philadelphia Naval Hospital that Barton became a footnote in the development of U.S. presidential case law, specifically, the Monroe Precedent of 1818. Barton was court-martialed after being accused of two counts of “conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman” in relation to his actions securing a staff position for himself at the hospital.

President James Monroe met with Barton twice to discuss the appointment at the Naval Hospital. Subsequently, Monroe was subpoenaed to appear before the judge advocate to testify about those meetings. Monroe is in select company. Only three other sitting presidents have been subpoenaed: Thomas Jefferson (Aaron Burr trial), Richard Nixon (Watergate tapes), and Bill Clinton (Paula Jones lawsuit).

Monroe eventually submitted a written deposition, although it arrived after the court made its decision. Barton was found guilty on one count of acting improperly, but he was acquitted of outright lying and received a mild reprimand.

In 1842, President John Tyler appointed Barton as the first head of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. He recommended many reforms, including higher standards for Naval physicians and tighter control of medical supplies and alcohol. Not surprisingly, his strict policies on alcohol were unpopular amongst the sailors.

The American physician and botanist, Jacob Bigelow, was Barton’s friend and classmate in medical school. They both trained under Benjamin Barton and developed a passion for medical botany. Bigelow published the first volume of his American Medical Botany in 1817, just after Barton. Barton decided in 1815 to write Vegetable materia medica of the United States to honor his uncle after his death, while Bigelow began his project in the spring of 1816.

Barton’s work, published in an edition of only 500 copies, contained fewer entries than Bigelow’s. This allowed Barton to find enough colorists to hand-color his plates, which were often elegant and preferred by contemporaries.

Bigelow, planning a larger edition, resorted to a color-printing process for some plates. Not all copies of Barton’s work have colored plates; some are partially or entirely uncolored.

Vegetable materia medica was published in eight parts, with the final number issued in March 1819. Some copies contain advertisement leaves indicating the publication details and instructions for binders.

Although a third volume was advertised in 1820, it was never published. Barton’s work depicts 49 different plants, shrubs, and trees in 50 plates, with descriptions of their geographical distribution, appearance, and medical properties.

The JMRBR is lucky enough to have two copies of Vegetable materia medica. The first is covered in one-quarter red leather with marbled paper. It shows some wear and tear with scratched and torn covers and the cover of volume one is partly detached.

The second copy is also covered in one-quarter red leather, but with an accompanying plain brown leather. The paper in both copies is in okay shape, but with quite a bit of foxing throughout.

Contact curator Damien Ihrig to see this book or any others in the collection via email or 319-335-9154.

By Christine Blaumueller, PhD
originally published in the Scientific and Research Communication Core newsletter

Graphical abstracts are used by some publishers such as Lancet and Elsevier, and some journals now request them. Graphical abstracts can help attract audiences to a paper and may be promoted on publisher’s social media or websites.

Sample graphical abstract
Weaver, L., Tran, C. G., Kahl, A. R., Troester, A., Mishra, A., Prakash, A., Brauer, D., Charlton, M. E., Hassan, I., & Goffredo, P. (2025). Patterns of care in patients with asymptomatic stage IV colon cancer: A population-based analysis. Surgery, 184, 109408. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109408

A graphical abstract is a single visual representation that summarizes the most important parts of a study, and it is intended to pique the reader’s interest. As an overview figure for a manuscript, it should be distinct from the other figures and, like a written abstract, it should quickly convey the take-home message. Graphical abstracts are typically designed to accompany journal articles, in which case they provide an opportunity to improve on the abstract by utilizing images. However, graphical abstracts can also serve other purposes. For example, they can be generated to use on a conference poster, enhance a lab website, or share a scientific message on social media.

Below, we briefly summarize some of the key points to consider when generating a graphical abstract. Most of these ideas are illustrated in this video¹ from BioRender, and they are also discussed in greater detail in several resources^2–5. Note that BioRender provides a library of templates for graphical abstracts; these can be a great starting point. Programs other than BioRender that can be used to generate graphical abstracts include Canva, Microsoft PowerPoint, and Adobe Illustrator².

Layout and story flow: focus on the key message

• Keep graphical abstracts simple and concise.
  • Avoid including distracting information. Clutter (visual or textual) can overwhelm a reader.
  • Keep the focus on the main points you wish to convey.
• Present the information in a logical order.
  • Be sure to start at the beginning of your “story” and make the flow intuitive. For example,
    • if the story is about a linear process, follow the order we naturally use to read information on a page, i.e., from left to right and from top to bottom;
    • if multiple outcomes are possible, use branching; and
    • if a circular process is described (e.g., a life cycle), make the path circular and clockwise.
  • Get input on the flow of your graphical abstract early on.
    • Give a colleague a draft and have them mark up the copy to show how they absorb the information.
    • Ask them to show you both where in the image they start and what path their eyes follow; this will help you identify any distractions and other points of confusion as you refine your graphical abstract. 

Color: keep in mind the associations a reader might make

• Use color judiciously and consistently to highlight the important features (e.g., “main characters”) of a story and to create associations that allow for a cohesive and logical flow of information. For example,
  • readers tend to associate warm colors like red with “villains,” so use these to represent dangerous agents (e.g., cancer cells or inflammation);
  • readers tend to associate cool colors like blue with “heroes” so use these to highlight positive agents (e.g., healthy cells or anti-inflammatory agents); and
  • readers will expect green to indicate GFP—be sure not to disappoint them.
• Limit your color palette.
  • Too many colors will distract readers and defeat the purpose of the graphical abstract.
• Use colors that are color-blind safe.
  • Common graphics resources like those available in BioRender and the Adobe suite enable you to test this.

Highlights: make it easy to spot relevant differences

• Format contextual, repeating elements consistently.
  • Make them the same color, height, and shape, and place them in the same relative position wherever they appear.
  • Align repeating elements horizontally or vertically using guidelines or an alignment tool.
• Highlight the elements that change as appropriate for your design.
  • Make sure that contrast is good, using:
    • transparency to dim “background elements,” i.e., the contextual information that needs to be included but isn’t the focus (usually 50% transparency works well); and
    • bright colors for the elements that change, to distinguish them from any dimmed background.
  • If the point is that the shape and/or size of an element changes, depict these differences by using distinct shapes and sizes.
  • If the point is that an element shifts to a new place, depict it in its new position.

Other considerations

• Tailor your graphical abstract to your target audience and to where it will be posted.
  • Know your audience.
  • Consider what this audience will need to know.
• Be sure to comply with your publisher’s requirements.
  • These may vary depending on where the graphical abstract will be posted.
  • See example of guidelines from Elsevier³.
• Get feedback not only early in the process of designing your graphic abstract, but at multiple stages.

It may feel daunting to design a graphical abstract but don’t be afraid to get started. Once you do, you might have fun—and you might even come up with new ideas for your project in the process!

If you need help with graphical abstracts, you can contact your Hardin Library for the Health Sciences librarian or the SERCC team.

Resources:

1. Top 4 design tips: Designing Graphical Abstracts, Shiz Aoki, video in the bioRender Learning Hub
2. What is a Graphical Abstract and Why Do I Need One for My Paper? Kerry Stricker, from Springer Nature Research Solutions, May 26, 2023
3. Graphical Abstract, from the Elsevier Author Tools & Resources Pages
4. 5 Tips for Creating a Graphical Abstract, Catherine Zettel Nalan, from Springer Nature Research Solutions, December 12, 2023
5. Points of View: The Overview Figure, Bang Wong, Nature Methods 8, 365 (2011).

by Riley Samuelson

Now is a great time to back up your EndNote libraries and keep those citations safe!

There are a couple of options for easy backup, syncing with an online account and creating a compressed library.

To set up an account for syncing (works with only one desktop library):

1. Visit https://access.clarivate.com/register?app=endnote
2. Go through the steps of registering for an account (after setup and syncing, you can use your online library at https://web.endnote.com/login)
3. After your account is created, open up the EndNote desktop application on your computer
4. Navigate to EndNote’s preferences/settings (Windows: Edit>Preferences; Mac: EndNote 21>Settings)
5. Open the ‘Sync’ section
6. Type in the credentials of your EndNote account
7. Click ‘Enable Sync’
8. Click ‘OK,’ let the syncing process, and you’re set!

To create a compressed library file:

1. Open up the EndNote desktop application on your computer
2. Navigate with File>Compress Library
3. Choose your preferences; the default and most comprehensive option is to have ‘Create’, ‘With File Attachments’, and ‘All References in Library’ selected
4. Click ‘Next’
5. Choose where to save the compressed library (.enlx extension). It’s safest to store it in a place that won’t be affected if your computer runs into catastrophic issues, like an online storage folder (OneDrive), a network drive, or an external drive like a flash drive
6. Click ‘Save,’ let it process, and you’re done!

If you need help backing up your EndNote files or even using EndNote, please contact your Hardin Library for the Health Sciences librarian.

If you want to get started using EndNote, you can also attend a workshop or request an individual session.

Hardin Library for the Health Sciences staff want you to succeed with finals, so we have some ways to make spending time at the library easier.

Later Hours 
The library will be open until 9 p.m. on Friday, May 9, and Saturday, May 10. The 24-hour study is available to UI affiliates when the library is closed.

Free coffee and snacks
Free coffee and snacks beginning Friday, May 9, while supplies last!

Find our dinosaur
Be the first person to find our stuffed dinosaur, Little Linda, every day and win a Hardin Library mug. Linda will be hidden from Saturday, May 10, through Thursday, May 14.

Ranch dip taste test
Love ranch dip? Vote for your favorite and register to win a prize snack bag on Sunday, May 11, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. Prizes sponsored by Lynne Church.

Positive affirmations
We have a whiteboard of affirmations to help you stay positive during this busy time. Take one if you need one!

Group study rooms
Need a group study room? We have 12 that you can reserve online.

And remember, you can always visit Hardin Library’s website for more information, including how to contact a health sciences librarian for assistance, during finals week or anytime throughout the year.