<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
  	<title>USGS Newsroom</title>
 	<link>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/</link>
	<description>News Releases   </description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<managingEditor>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing Web Group)</managingEditor>
	
	
			
				
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/usgs/EnergyandMinerals" /><feedburner:info uri="usgs/energyandminerals" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>usgs/EnergyandMinerals</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
				<title><![CDATA[New Insight on Gas Hydrates in Gulf of Mexico]]></title>
				<category>TA</category>
			
				<category>GasHydrate MethaneHydrate Hydrates EnergyandMinerals EnergyResources GulfOfMexico Seismic</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/OWr9Jwy3Goo/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>LA</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MS</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>TX</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;em&gt;Research is Part of a Long-Standing, Interagency Collaboration&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scientists have returned from a 15&amp;#8209;day research expedition in the northern Gulf of Mexico with the best high-resolution seismic data and imagery ever obtained of sediments with high gas hydrate saturations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The expedition and the data and imagery collected resulted from long-standing cooperation between the U.S. Department of the Interior's U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). This collaboration aims to advance scientific understanding of gas hydrates, an important potential future energy resource.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="widows: 2; text-transform: none; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; display: inline !important; font: 12px arial, sans-serif; white-space: normal; orphans: 2; float: none; letter-spacing: normal; color: #222222; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;Gas hydrates are ice-like substances formed when certain gases combine with water at specific pressures and temperatures. Deposits of gas hydrates are widespread in marine sediments beneath the ocean floor and in sediments within and beneath permafrost areas, where pressure-temperature conditions keep the gas trapped in the hydrate structure. Methane is the gas most often trapped in these deposits, making gas hydrates a potentially significant source for natural gas around the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"This expedition represents a significant milestone," said USGS Energy Resources Program Coordinator Brenda Pierce. "The data and imagery provide insight into the entire petroleum system at each location, including the source of gas, the migration pathways for the gas, the distribution of hydrate-bearing sediments, and the traps that hold the hydrate and free gas in place. The USGS has a globally recognized research effort studying gas hydrates in settings around the world, and this project combines our unique expertise with that of other agencies to advance research on this potential future energy resource."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The recently completed expedition was planned jointly by USGS, DOE, and BOEM, and was executed by USGS. &amp;nbsp;Using low-energy seismic sources, USGS scientists collected details about the nature of the gas hydrate reservoirs and about geologic features of the sediment between the reservoirs and the seafloor. The new data also provide information about how much gas hydrate exists in a much broader area than can be determined from using standard industry seismic data, which is typically designed to image much deeper geologic units.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Understanding the nature and setting of deepwater gas hydrates is central to the National Methane Hydrates R&amp;amp;D Program, which is led by DOE and managed by Fossil Energy's National Energy Technology Laboratory," said Christopher Smith, DOE&amp;rsquo;s Acting Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy. "Over the past 8 years, research carried out under this program has resulted in significant advances in our understanding of methane hydrates, their role in nature, and their potential as a future energy resource. This success is largely due to an unprecedented level of cooperation among federal agencies, industry, national laboratories, and academic institutions."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The high-resolution nature of the data acquired through this interagency project will uniquely inform the BOEM effort to assess the resource potential of gas hydrates on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf," said Renee Orr, Chief, Strategic Resources Office, BOEM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The data were collected at two locations in the Gulf of Mexico where the three federal agencies partnered with an industry consortium to conduct &lt;a href="http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/futuresupply/methanehydrates/2009gomjip/"&gt;a drilling expedition in 2009&lt;/a&gt;. That expedition discovered gas hydrate filling between 50&amp;nbsp;and 90&amp;nbsp;percent of the available pore space between sediment grains in sandy layers in the subsurface. These reservoirs are expected to be representative of the &lt;a href="http://www.boem.gov/uploadedFiles/BOEM/Oil_and_Gas_Energy_Program/Resource_Evaluation/Gas_Hydrates/MMS2008-004.pdf"&gt;6,700 trillion cubic feet of gas that BOEM estimates&lt;/a&gt; is housed in gas hydrates in sand-rich reservoirs in the northern Gulf of Mexico.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new data are being used to refine estimates of the nature, distribution, and concentration of gas hydrate in the vicinity of the 2009 drill sites. This will help assess how useful specialized seismic data may be to estimating hydrate saturations in deepwater sediments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In coming years, the three agencies will continue their collaborative investigation of gas hydrates in the northern Gulf of Mexico and other locations across the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Learn more about USGS research on &lt;a href="http://woodshole.er.usgs.gov/project-pages/hydrates/"&gt;gas hydrates&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://energy.usgs.gov/OilGas/UnconventionalOilGas/GasHydrates.aspx"&gt;energy&lt;/a&gt; at locations around the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="605" align="center"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_05_14/map.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_05_14/map_tn.jpg" alt="caption below" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_05_14/hydrate_magery.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_05_14/hydrate_imagery_tn.jpg" alt="caption below" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td valign="top"&gt;&lt;span class="small"&gt;Stars show the locations of seismic surveys conducted to image previously-identified deepwater gas hydrate deposits in the northern Gulf of Mexico on the research ship Pelican during a cruise in April and May 2013. (&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_05_14/map.jpg"&gt;Larger image&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;span class="small"&gt;This high-resolution image was collected during a seismic cruise to study locations with high concentrations of gas hydrate in the northern Gulf of Mexico in April and May 2013. The data were collected at the Walker Ridge location, where 2009 drilling at the site of the well (shown in red revealed) the distribution of gas hydrates and methane gas in the sediments. The water depth at the well is 6562 feet, and the red and blue colors shown within the image correspond to sediment layers, which mostly dip westward. Sand layers with high concentrations of gas hydrate are marked, but hydrate also occurs elsewhere in this sedimentary section. (&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_05_14/hydrate_magery.jpg"&gt;Larger image&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;iframe frameborder="0" height="400" width="600" id="gallery_news" name="NR2013_05_14" scrolling="auto" src="http://gallery.usgs.gov/photo_shares/thumbs/tags/NR2013_05_14/1" title="Image Gallery"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=OWr9Jwy3Goo:E-i5mVNGIfA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=OWr9Jwy3Goo:E-i5mVNGIfA:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=OWr9Jwy3Goo:E-i5mVNGIfA:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=OWr9Jwy3Goo:E-i5mVNGIfA:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/OWr9Jwy3Goo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3588&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[USGS Releases New Oil and Gas Assessment for Bakken and Three Forks Formations]]></title>
				<category>DOI</category>
			
				<category>Bakken BakkenFormation ContinuousOil Energy EnergyAssessments EnergyResourcesProgram EnergyandMinerals HydraulicFracturing HydrofrackingMontana NorthDakota Oil OilandGas USGS WillistonBasin</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/ryTGfp4UAWk/usgs-releases-new-oil-and-gas-assessment-for-bakken-and-three-forks-formations.cfm</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>DC</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MT</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>ND</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>SD</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NAT</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="widows: 2; text-transform: none; background-color: #ffffff; text-indent: 0px; display: inline !important; font: 13px/16px arial, helvetica, sans-serif; white-space: normal; orphans: 2; float: none; letter-spacing: normal; color: #222222; word-spacing: 0px;"&gt;The United States Geological Survey (USGS) today released an updated oil and gas resource assessment for the Bakken Formation and a new assessment for the Three Forks Formation in North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=ryTGfp4UAWk:2f-aFZNQ9L0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=ryTGfp4UAWk:2f-aFZNQ9L0:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=ryTGfp4UAWk:2f-aFZNQ9L0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=ryTGfp4UAWk:2f-aFZNQ9L0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/ryTGfp4UAWk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:59:32 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/usgs-releases-new-oil-and-gas-assessment-for-bakken-and-three-forks-formations.cfm</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[High Arsenic Levels Found in 8 Percent of Groundwater Wells Studied in Pennsylvania]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>Arsenic Groundwater PennsylvaniaGeographicAreasNortheast WaterGroundwaterResources PennsylvaniaGroundwater ArsenicPennsylvaniaGroundwater PennsylvaniaGroundwaterQuality</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/ieRhRknHkBY/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>PA</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5257/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;report and maps&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; are posted online.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa&lt;/strong&gt;. &amp;ndash; Eight percent of more than 5,000 wells tested across Pennsylvania contain groundwater with levels of arsenic at or above federal standards set for public drinking water, while an additional 12 percent &amp;ndash; though not exceeding standards &amp;ndash; show elevated levels of arsenic.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These findings, along with maps depicting areas in the state most likely to have elevated levels of arsenic in groundwater, are part of a recently released U.S. Geological Survey study done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Departments of Health and Environmental Protection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results highlight the importance of private well owners testing and potentially treating their water.&amp;nbsp; While public water supplies are treated to ensure that water reaching the tap of households meets federal drinking water standards, private wells are unregulated in Pennsylvania, and owners are responsible for testing and treating their own water.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For this study, USGS scientists compiled data collected between 1969 and 2007 from industrial, public, and private wells. Arsenic levels, along with other groundwater quality and environmental factors, were used to generate statewide and regional maps that predict the probability of elevated arsenic.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The study examined groundwater from carbonate, crystalline, and shale/sandstone bedrock aquifers, and from shallow glacial sediment aquifers. Similar maps have been produced for other states.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"This research is not intended to predict arsenic levels for individual wells; its purpose is to predict the probability of elevated levels of arsenic in groundwater to help public health efforts in Pennsylvania," said USGS scientist Eliza Gross, who led the study.&amp;nbsp; "The study results and associated probability maps provide water-resource managers and health officials with useful data as they consider management actions in areas where groundwater is most likely to contain elevated levels of arsenic."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Pennsylvania Department of Health plans to use the maps as an educational tool to inform health professionals and citizens of the Commonwealth about the possibility of elevated arsenic in drinking water wells and to help improve the health of residents, particularly in rural communities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arsenic occurs naturally and, in Pennsylvania, is most common in shallow glacial and shale/sandstone type aquifers, particularly those containing pyrite minerals. Arsenic can also result from human activities. Geologic conditions, such as fractures, and chemical factors in groundwater, such as low oxygen, extreme pH, and salinity, can cause arsenic to leach from rocks, become mobile, and contaminate wells distant from the source. &amp;nbsp;Groundwater with elevated arsenic levels &amp;ndash; more than 4 micrograms per liter -- can be found in scattered locations throughout Pennsylvania.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arsenic in drinking water has been linked to several types of cancer, reproductive problems, diabetes, a weakened immune system, and developmental delays in children.&amp;nbsp; Arsenic can be reduced or eliminated in tap water through treatment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Private well owners can find testing and other information on &lt;a href="http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt?open=514&amp;amp;objID=553922&amp;amp;mode=2"&gt;Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Arsenic in Drinking Water website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=ieRhRknHkBY:HU5EptFHAlY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=ieRhRknHkBY:HU5EptFHAlY:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=ieRhRknHkBY:HU5EptFHAlY:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=ieRhRknHkBY:HU5EptFHAlY:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/ieRhRknHkBY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 9:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3564&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[President's 2014 USGS Budget Proposal Strengthens Science]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>2014Budget USGSBudget USGSBudget2014 FY2014Budget FY14Budget Landsat8 ChesapeakeBay CaliforniaBayDelta streamgage Economy Everglades PugetSound AsianCarp ColumbiaRiver ClimateScienceCenters GreatLakes BurmesePython KlamathRiver waterSMART BudgetPlanningandIntegration ClimateandLandUseChangeCarbonSequestration ClimateandLandUseChange ClimateandLandUseChangeLandRemoteSensing ClimateandLandUseChangeNationalClimateChangeandWildlifeScienceCenter ClimateandLandUseChangeEarthResourcesObservationandScienceCenter ClimateandLandUseChangeResearchandDevelopment CoreScienceSystems Ecosystems EcosystemsFisheriesAquaticandEndangeredResources EcosystemsInvasiveSpecies EcosystemsTerrestrialFreshwaterandMarineEnvironments CoastalChange Coasts  WaterResearchInstitutes NorthAmericanDataBuy YouthStewardship EcosystemsWildlifeTerrestrialandEndangeredResources CriticalMinerals RareEarthMinerals BigData EnergyandMinerals EnergyandMineralsEnergyResources EnergyandMineralsMineralResources EnvironmentalHealth NaturalHazards NaturalHazardsCoastalandMarineGeology NaturalHazardsEarthquakeHazards NaturalHazardsLandslideHazards NaturalHazardsVolcanoHazards Water WaterNationalWaterQualityAssessment WaterNationalStreamflowInformation</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/uGxeLueRe1s/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NAT</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;President Obama's fiscal year (FY) 2014 budget request for the U.S. Geological Survey is $1.167 billion, an increase of $98.8 million above the 2012 enacted level, reflecting the Administration's commitment to scientific research and development as the foundation for innovation, socio-economic well-being, environmental sustainability, and sound decisionmaking.&lt;!--introend--&gt; This includes science to support the safe and responsible development of domestic energy, protect critical water resources and ecosystems, respond to natural disasters, and advance our understanding and resilience to the effects of climate change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposed 2014 USGS budget priorities include studying energy resources and environmental issues; advancing water monitoring and availability research; supporting the nationwide streamgage network; improving the capacity to quickly and effectively respond to natural hazards; providing information needed to protect priority ecosystems; and enhancing climate change research that is user-focused to address specific needs of natural resource managers across the landscape.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The USGS prides itself in providing relevant and reliable Earth science, and our range of specialized expertise makes us a leader in supporting the President's focus on research and development," said acting USGS Director Suzette Kimball. "Starting with science is the foundation for making decisions that ensure the safety of our Nation and a robust and resilient economy. The proposed budget supports programs that are unique to the USGS, ultimately enhancing understanding of our land, its resources, and potential hazards that face us."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed USGS key increases are summarized below. For more detailed information on the President's proposed 2014 budget, visit the &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/budget/2014/2014index.asp"&gt;USGS Budget, Planning, and Integration website&lt;/a&gt;&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;New Energy Frontier&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To ensure a robust and secure energy future for the Nation, President Obama emphasizes an "all-of-the-above" strategy, and the USGS has an important contribution in each component of that strategy. Proposed funding increases totaling $4.0 million will support the exploration of &lt;a href="http://energy.usgs.gov/OtherEnergy/Geothermal.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;geothermal resources&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; on Federal lands as well as research to support mitigation of the &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/ecosystems/energy_wildlife/introduction.html"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;impacts of wind energy on wildlife&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. A total of $18.6 million, an increase of $13.0 million, will support interagency science collaboration between the USGS, the Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency to understand and minimize potential adverse environmental, health, and safety impacts of shale gas development through &lt;a href="http://energy.usgs.gov/OilGas/UnconventionalOilGas/HydraulicFracturing.aspx"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;hydraulic fracturing&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Water&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As competition for water resources grows, so does the need for &lt;a href="http://water.usgs.gov/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;better information about water quality and quantity&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;Funding in the 2014 proposed budget includes an increase of $7.2 million to fund more than 400 streamgages that would enhance the ability to monitor high priority sites sensitive to drought, flooding, and potential climate change effects. The budget also includes $22.5 million for WaterSMART, an initiative focused on a sustainable water strategy to address the Nation's water challenges. WaterSMART includes the combined efforts of the USGS and the Bureau of Reclamation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Natural Disasters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the past year, the USGS responded to hurricanes Sandy and Isaac, wildfires ravaging the West, worldwide earthquakes, historical floods, and many other natural disasters. The budget proposes $2.5 million to improve rapid disaster response, allowing the USGS to better provide timely and effective science to &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/natural_hazards/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;minimize hazard risks to populations and infrastructure&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Funding support includes improvements in early warning and scenario products for earthquakes, eruptions of volcanic ash, landslides and debris flows. In addition, an increase of $1.2 million is proposed to expand seismic networks along the Central and Eastern United States and improve the suite of USGS products that provide "situational awareness" for responders to gauge earthquake impacts and plan response activities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Ecosystem Priorities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;USGS scientists conduct research and monitoring to understand how ecosystems are structured and function, helping improve sustainable stewardship of the Nation's natural resources. The 2014 budget request includes increases totaling $16.6 million for &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/ecosystems/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;priority ecosystem science&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. This includes research to control and manage invasive species, such as Asian carp in the Great Lakes and the Burmese python in the Everglades. The proposed budget includes strong support for ecosystem restoration in the California Bay Delta, Chesapeake Bay, Columbia River, Everglades, Great Lakes, Klamath River, Puget Sound, and Upper Mississippi River as well as efforts to better understand and account for ecosystem services in decisionmaking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Climate Change Science&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FY 2014 budget request includes a total of $67.8 million for the Science for Adapting to a Changing Climate initiative that advances understanding and enhances resilience in the face of changing conditions. Funding increases for the &lt;a href="https://nccwsc.usgs.gov/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;USGS National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (NCCWSC) and the eight &lt;a href="http://www.doi.gov/csc/index.cfm"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;DOI Climate Science Centers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (CSCs) will provide applied science and tools to support adaptive and resilient management of natural resources on public and tribal lands, help facilitate coordination of climate change research across Federal agencies, and improve understanding of nationwide challenges such as sea-level rise and drought. Increases in the &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/climate_landuse/clu_rd/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;Climate Research and Development Program&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; will improve understanding of current and future impacts change and needs specific to regional areas. Funding for the Biological Sequestration program in 2014 will advance methodologies and models needed to complete the &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/climate_landuse/land_carbon/default.asp"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;national biological carbon sequestration assessment&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and provide science and tools for land and natural resource management.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Land Imaging Satellites&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;With Landsat 8 successfully launched in February, the USGS is preparing for the handover of operational responsibility from NASA and will continue to operate Landsat ground systems for receiving, processing, and disseminating the valuable imagery. The &lt;a href="http://landsat.usgs.gov/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;USGS will also be working with NASA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to analyze user requirements and develop a successor mission to Landsat 8, with timing and configuration designed to minimize the risk of a gap in the unparalleled 41-year historical record of this data. Funding to begin work on the successor mission is provided in the 2014 budget for NASA, which will be responsible for the operation, building, and launching of Landsat-class land imaging satellites going forward, in partnership with the USGS.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Critical Minerals and Rare Earth Elements&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;Many existing and emerging technologies that are important to our economy and national security are generating unprecedented demand for critical minerals. Ensuring an adequate supply of critical minerals depends on learning how they form and where they are most likely to be found in the Earth's crust. An increase of $1.0 million is proposed specifically for USGS research on rare earth elements, which are a type of critical mineral. An additional $1.1 million is proposed to expand research on other high priority minerals critical to American manufacturing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Additional Science Priorities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;The 2014 budget would expand USGS youth programs and partnerships with a proposed increase for the development of a 21st Century Conservation Service Corps, an element of the Youth Stewardship and America's Great Outdoors Initiatives. The budget request would support studies that address environmental impacts of uranium mining as well as emerging contaminants and pathogens. The &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3152"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;USGS component of the Big Earth Data Initiative&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; will support standardizing and optimizing the management of data from Earth observations systems, such as water and wildlife monitoring networks, operated by the Department of the Interior to support decisionmaking, scientific discovery, and technological innovation. Increased funding will be provided to begin implementation of the &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2012/3089/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;3D Elevation program&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; responding to a growing need for high-quality topographic data and a wide range of other three-dimensional representations of the Nation's natural and constructed features to meet needs such as quantification of flood risk and coastal vulnerability to storms. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Budget Reductions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: %value;"&gt;The proposed USGS budget for 2014 includes reductions based on careful and difficult consideration for balancing national Earth science and technology priorities and needs. Proposed reductions include mineral resources research, the &lt;a href="http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/"&gt;&lt;span style="color: #0000ff;"&gt;Water Resource Research Institutes&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, the National Civil Application Program, North American Data Buy, and internal administrative costs.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=uGxeLueRe1s:QorjdWhfabw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=uGxeLueRe1s:QorjdWhfabw:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=uGxeLueRe1s:QorjdWhfabw:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=uGxeLueRe1s:QorjdWhfabw:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/uGxeLueRe1s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3556&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[USGS Finds No Influence of Oil Platforms on Contaminant Levels in California Fishes]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>EnergyandMineralsEnergyResources Ecosystems EcosystemsTerrestrialFreshwaterandMarineEnvironments water oilrigs oil fish California Missouri ColumbiaEnvironmentalResearchCenter BOEM oilplatforms contaminants ContaminantsBiology energy</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/6vNgOrIEjQ0/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>CA</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MO</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NAT</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;Fishes residing near oil platforms in southern California have similar contaminant levels as fishes in nearby natural sites, according to two recent reports by the U.S. Geological Survey, which were conducted to assist the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) in understanding potential consequences of offshore energy development.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the underwater portion of many offshore oil and gas platforms often provides habitat to a large number of fishes and invertebrates, some stakeholders have called for ocean managers to consider a "rigs-to-reefs" option during the decommissioning phase of a platform. This option would maintain some of the submerged structure to function as an artificial reef after oil and gas production has ended. The findings of this study address questions regarding how the industrial legacy of this kind of artificial reef may affect local fish populations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists analyzed the amount of contaminants from crude oil exposure present in three species of fish residing at oil platforms within the Santa Barbara Channel and the San Pedro Basin in California.&amp;nbsp; The amount of contaminants present in fish tissue samples at seven platform sites was compared to samples at natural nearby sites. The &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1046/"&gt;brand new&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1248/"&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt; USGS reports are available online.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"As part of this study, we developed methods capable of detecting the extremely low levels of contaminants that we anticipated in these ocean fishes, especially since they avoid natural oil seeps," said USGS scientist Robert Gale. "These results will assist decision-makers in helping to protect the environment off the coast of California."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the most important contaminants related to oil operations are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Several PAHs are probable human carcinogens and many are toxic to fish and other aquatic life. Scientists were able to develop a new, more accurate method of sampling small traces of PAHs that may have been ingested and broken down within the fish. Samples were taken from species thought to be most sensitive to PAH contamination. These species, including Pacific sanddab, kelp rockfish, and kelp bass, also tend to be targeted by fishermen. PAH concentrations were either very low or undetectable in all fish sampled for this study.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"These important results suggest two things," said BOEM marine biologist Donna Schroeder. "First, existing offshore oil platforms provide food and shelter to local fishes without increasing their background contaminant loads. Second, since there is no detectable PAH signal from ongoing operations, we would expect that if the State of California wanted to implement a rigs-to-reefs program, there would likely be no change, pollution-wise, in the quality of the offshore environment, which appears to be pretty good."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scientists also looked at industrial chemicals in the Pacific sanddab species, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), flame retardants (polybrominated diphenylethers, PBDEs), and pesticides (OCPs). These contaminants were also found at low levels in all fish sampled, with no observed pattern between natural and platform habitats.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management promotes energy independence, environmental protection and economic development through responsible, science-based management of offshore conventional and renewable energy. While the agency is responsible for analyzing the potential environmental impacts of removing oil and gas platforms in federal waters, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement approves applications for decommissioning and ensures that they are conducted safely and in compliance with federal regulations. For additional information on BOEM activities, visit &lt;a href="http://www.boem.gov/"&gt;http://www.boem.gov/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;iframe frameborder="0" height="400" width="600" id="gallery_news" name="NR2013_04_02" scrolling="auto" src="http://gallery.usgs.gov/photo_shares/thumbs/tags/NR2013_04_02/1" title="Image Gallery"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=6vNgOrIEjQ0:Heq3KcyEjf8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=6vNgOrIEjQ0:Heq3KcyEjf8:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=6vNgOrIEjQ0:Heq3KcyEjf8:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=6vNgOrIEjQ0:Heq3KcyEjf8:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/6vNgOrIEjQ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:09:17 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3546&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Report Shows Potential Groundwater Supplies in Part of New York's Susquehanna River Valley]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>NewYork Susquehanna GroundWater HydraulicFracturing Fracking BroomeCounty  ChenangoCounty Marcellus Utica Water GeographicAreasNortheast</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/x3h9AxdjXCQ/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NY</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5282/"&gt;report, interactive map&lt;/a&gt; and a &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5127/index.html"&gt;companion publication&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5127/index.html"&gt;for an adjacent study area are online.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TROY, N.Y. &amp;ndash;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Three several-mile-long sections&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;of the Susquehanna River Valley aquifer are the most favorable for potential large-scale groundwater supply along the Susquehanna Valley's 32-mile reach in Broome and Chenango counties, according to a recent U.S. Geological Survey study.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The study area includes part of south-central New York that has substantial natural gas potential in the underlying Marcellus and Utica shales, and therefore could be subject to future gas-drilling activities. USGS completed it in cooperation with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. This study area is within the eastern portions of the Marcellus/Utica Shale areas in New York. A companion publication, released in 2012, details water resources in counties to the west.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="250" align="right"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_03_13/susquehanna_river_valley_tn.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_03_13/susquehanna_river_valley_tn.jpg" alt="Location of the study area and extent of stratified drift along the Susquehanna River valley in eastern Broome and southeastern Chenango Counties, New York." /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;span class="small"&gt;Figure 8 from the report showing distribution of aquifer types and settings within the Susquehanna River valley-fill aquifer system,eastern Broome and southeastern Chenango Counties, New York. The most favorable groundwater areas are shown in brown. (&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2013_03_13/susquehanna_river_valley.jpg"&gt;(Higher resolution image&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"This study is intended to put basic facts into the hands of those tasked with making decisions on future groundwater use and protection,' said USGS scientist Paul Heisig, who led the evaluation. 'We have identified and mapped a variety of aquifer types and described their current use and their potential as groundwater sources.'&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The aquifers that have the highest potential to support large-scale municipal or industrial operations, but are most susceptible to pollution from land use are "unconfined' aquifers having thick layers of coarse-grained sediments that readily receive recharge. They are found mostly in Broome County in the following three reaches: from the Pennsylvania border to one mile north of South Windsor; the valley section that rounds the west side of the bedrock hill north of Windsor; and the valley from Nineveh to east of Bettsburg.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other aquifers in the region include valley "confined" aquifers -- those surrounded by rock or sediments that are a barrier to direct recharge from rainfall; thin unconfined aquifers that are recharged but have little capacity to store groundwater; and the fractured bedrock aquifer that is widespread, but only adequate to supply household wells.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current water-resource development in the region is limited. Fractured bedrock serves household wells only. It is the sole water source for household wells in the uplands. Nearby fractured bedrock is also a source of recharge to the aquifers in the Susquehanna Valley. Valley aquifers provide water to household wells and provide public supply to three villages &amp;ndash; Windsor, Bainbridge, and Afton.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;USGS provides science for a changing world. For more information visit the &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov"&gt;USGS website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To receive USGS news releases go to &lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/getournews/"&gt;Get Our News!&lt;/a&gt; to subscribe.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=x3h9AxdjXCQ:8P4sv92_kt4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=x3h9AxdjXCQ:8P4sv92_kt4:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=x3h9AxdjXCQ:8P4sv92_kt4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=x3h9AxdjXCQ:8P4sv92_kt4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/x3h9AxdjXCQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 10:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3524&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Iowa Meteorite Crater Confirmed]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>GeographicAreasMidwest EnergyandMineralsMineralResources</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/-WneyvPWows/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>IA</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>KS</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MO</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NE</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;em&gt;USGS Airborne Surveys Back Up Previous Decorah Research&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;Recent airborne geophysical surveys near Decorah, Iowa are providing an unprecedented look at a 470- million-year-old meteorite crater concealed beneath bedrock and sediments.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;The aerial surveys, a collaboration of the U.S. Geological Survey with the Iowa and Minnesota Geological Surveys, were conducted in the last&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;60 days to map geologic structures and assess the mineral and water resources of the region.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;"Capturing images of an ancient meteorite impact was a huge bonus,"&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;said Dr. Paul Bedrosian, a USGS geophysicist in Denver who is leading the effort to model the recently acquired geophysical data. "These findings highlight the range of applications that these geophysical methods can address."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;In 2008-09, geologists from the Iowa Department of Natural Resources'&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;(Iowa DNR) Iowa Geological and Water Survey hypothesized what has become known as the Decorah Impact Structure. The scientists examined water well drill-cuttings and recognized a unique shale unit preserved only beneath and near the city of Decorah. The extent of the shale, which was deposited after the impact by an ancient seaway, defines a "nice circular basin" of 5.5 km width, according to&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="il"&gt;Robert&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;McKay, a geologist at the Iowa Geological Survey.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;Bevan French, a scientist the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, subsequently identified shocked quartz - considered strong evidence of an extra-terrestrial impact - in samples of sub-shale breccia from within the crater.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;"The recognition of this buried geological structure was possible because of the collaboration of a local geologist, water well drillers, the USGS STATEMAP program, and the support of the Iowa DNR concerning research on fundamental aspects of Iowa geology," said McKay.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;The recent geophysical surveys include an airborne electromagnetic system, which is sensitive to how well rocks conduct electricity, and airborne gravity gradiometry, which measures subtle changes in rock density. The surveys both confirm the earlier work and provide a new view of the Decorah Impact Structure. Models of the electromagnetic data show a crater filled with electrically conductive shale and the underlying breccia, which is rock composed of broken fragments of rock cemented together by a fine-grained matrix.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&amp;nbsp;"The shale is an ideal target and provides the electrical contrast that allows us to clearly image the geometry and internal structure of the crater," Bedrosian said.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;More analysis of the data will provide additional detail. These data show the impact as a nearly circular region distinct from the surrounding area to a depth of several hundred meters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;"These data, when coupled with physical property measurements on drill core samples, will form the basis for modeling efforts to constrain the impact geometry and energy of the meteorite," said Dr. Andy Kass, a USGS geophysicist working on the effort.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;The Iowa and Minnesota airborne geophysical surveys are targeting an igneous intrusion, known as the Northeast Iowa Igneous Intrusive complex, that may be similar to the Duluth layered igneous complex exposed in the Lake Superior region of northern Minnesota. Known copper, nickel, and platinum group metal resources were deposited during the formation of the Duluth complex. Both of these complexes are associated with a large structural feature known as the Midcontinent Rift, which is exposed in the Lake Superior Region but is covered by younger rocks as it extends to the south through Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;This geophysical survey is part of a larger USGS effort to evaluate the concealed mineral resource potential of the greater Midcontinent Rift region that formed about 1.1 billion years ago.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;iframe frameborder="0" height="400" width="600" id="gallery_news" name="NR2013_03_04" scrolling="auto" src="http://gallery.usgs.gov/photo_shares/thumbs/tags/NR2013_03_04/1" title="Image Gallery"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=-WneyvPWows:9K4IzSDDPJ8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=-WneyvPWows:9K4IzSDDPJ8:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=-WneyvPWows:9K4IzSDDPJ8:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=-WneyvPWows:9K4IzSDDPJ8:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/-WneyvPWows" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 5 Mar 2013 9:01:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3521&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[USGS Estimates 162 Billion Short Tons of Recoverable Coal in the Powder River Basin]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>EnergyandMineralsEnergyResources energy coal-bed coal 
PowderRiverBasin coalassessment Wyoming Montana 
GeographicAreasNorthwest</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/LT78L3HC36c/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MT</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>WY</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NAT</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;em&gt;New basin-wide assessment of recoverable resources and reserves&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;The Powder River Basin of Wyoming and Montana contains about 162 billion short tons (BST) of recoverable coal from a total of 1.07 trillion short tons of in-place resources according to a new USGS &lt;a href="http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/fs20123143"&gt;assessment&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;!--introend--&gt; This assessment also estimates that 25 BST of those resources are currently economical to recover, the first such estimate released by the USGS for coal for an entire basin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Powder River Basin&amp;mdash;a large geologic feature located in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana&amp;mdash;contains the largest deposits of low-sulfur subbituminous coal in the world. This study is significant because it illustrates that only a relatively small percentage of in-place coal resources are technically and economically recoverable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style="width: 160px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" align="right"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2012-02-26/prbmap.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2012-02-26/prbmap_thumb.jpg" alt="Powder River Basin Assessment Map" width="150" height="286" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr class="subtitle italics"&gt;
&lt;td&gt;Powder River Basin Assessment Map &amp;mdash; A map showing the four assessment units for the 2013 USGS Powder River Basin coal assessment.&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;The United States is well-known for its rich endowment of coal resources and our in-place estimates bear that out,&amp;rdquo; said USGS Acting Director Suzette Kimball. &amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s important to note, however, the substantial difference between what is in-place and what is technically recoverable, let alone economic. This new basin-wide assessment provides that critical link for government and private managers to make informed decisions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2011, the 16 mines in the PRB produced 462 million short tons (MST), about 42 percent of the Nation&amp;rsquo;s total coal production that year. &amp;nbsp;Subbituminous coal is typically used in electric power generation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The key to this study was taking advantage of the wealth of recently available geologic data from the interpretation of thousands of new drill logs from coalbed methane development in the PRB.&amp;nbsp; More than 8,000 new drill holes were added to the original Gillette coal field database alone. About 30,000 total data points were used in the entire PRB assessment. This geologic information interpreted from well information of the recent drilling provided an unprecedented level of data about the coal resources for the basin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USGS developed the geologic information that formed the basis of this assessment in cooperation with the Wyoming State Geological Survey and the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Basin was divided into four areas for assessment: the &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1113/"&gt;Montana Powder River Basin&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1294/"&gt;Northern Wyoming Powder River Basin&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1202/"&gt;Gillette coal field&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1134/"&gt;Southwestern Wyoming Powder River Basin&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within these four areas, the USGS assessed coal resources for 47 coal beds. The three largest beds by resource are the Canyon coal bed, the Anderson coal bed, and the Smith coal bed. These three coal beds together represent about 38 percent of the total coal resources for the Powder River Basin.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To arrive at the estimate of recoverable coal and 25 BST of reserves, USGS scientists selected portions of those coal beds from the total in-place resources that were deemed both shallow and thick enough to be recoverable using current surface mining technology. Ten conceptual mine models were developed to account for the differences in coal bed geology using proven mining techniques for each the four assessment areas of the PRB. Then, estimated mining costs were calculated for all of the modeled coal resources.&amp;nbsp; Finally, those resources that could be produced at or below the current sales price for PRB coal were designated reserves.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current 25 BST of reserves does not mean that is all that remains mineable. The size of reserves change because mining costs and coal sales prices are subject to fluctuation &amp;nbsp;based on market conditions &amp;ndash; recoverable resources become reserves with favorable changes in costs, demand, and prices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USGS Energy Resources Program research efforts yield modern, digital assessments of the quantity, quality, location, and accessibility of the Nation&amp;rsquo;s coal resources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To learn more about this or other geologic assessments, please visit the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://energy.usgs.gov/"&gt;USGS Energy Resources Program&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;website. Stay up to date with USGS energy science by subscribing to our &lt;a href="http://energy.usgs.gov/GeneralInfo/Newsletter.aspx"&gt;newsletter&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;or by following us on&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/usgsenergy"&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=LT78L3HC36c:l3N9FY-oaqk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=LT78L3HC36c:l3N9FY-oaqk:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=LT78L3HC36c:l3N9FY-oaqk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=LT78L3HC36c:l3N9FY-oaqk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/LT78L3HC36c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3518&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Tool Estimates Streamflow for Pennsylvania Waterways]]></title>
				<category>TA</category>
			
				<category>Water WaterHydrologicNetworksandAnalysis GeographicAreasNortheast BaselineStreamFlow PennsylvaniaStreamFlow BaSE BaselineStreamflowEstimator BaselineStreamFlowPennsylvania</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/dHQ72po0zzM/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>PA</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Editors:&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://pa.water.usgs.gov/projects/surfacewater/flow_estimation/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BaSE tool and supporting documentation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; can be found online. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;NEW CUMBERLAND, Pa. -- &lt;!--introstart--&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;Water resource managers can now estimate daily baseline streamflows in a matter of minutes for any location along Pennsylvania's waterways.&lt;!--introend--&gt; The &lt;strong&gt;Ba&lt;/strong&gt;seline &lt;strong&gt;S&lt;/strong&gt;treamflow &lt;strong&gt;E&lt;/strong&gt;stimator, called "BaSE," provides users with estimated daily mean streamflow, minimally altered by human activities, for locations on Pennsylvania streams that don&amp;rsquo;t have streamgages. Pennsylvania is one of the first states in the nation to have such a tool.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"BaSE provides water-resource managers with nearly 50 years of daily mean streamflow for ungaged sites in a matter of minutes that they can use for their projects. These daily values can then be used to generate a number of streamflow statistics that may be needed for decision making," said Marla Stuckey, USGS hydrologist and project lead in Pennsylvania.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Water-resource managers use daily mean streamflow to evaluate withdrawal, allocation, and wastewater permit applications and to assess the health of the Commonwealth's streams.&amp;nbsp; Historically, it has been difficult, costly, and time intensive to estimate daily mean streamflow for stream locations that were not gaged, or monitored. Now, BaSE allows users to estimate daily mean streamflow values and daily hydrographs by entering a few basic basin characteristics in an easy-to-use tool.&amp;nbsp; The output is a summary spreadsheet, containing information about the location of interest, including daily mean streamflow for every day from 1960 to 2008.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BaSE relies on a methodology that uses flow-duration curves, which illustrate the percentage of time, or probability, that a flow value in a stream will equal or exceed a particular value. Flow-duration curves are generated for reference streamgage locations with monitored streamflow and the curves are transferred to ungaged locations to estimate daily mean streamflow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BaSE chooses the most appropriate reference streamgage for the ungaged location and applies newly developed regression equations to convert the transferred flow duration curve to streamflow at the ungaged location.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A &lt;a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5142/"&gt;USGS Scientific Investigations Report&lt;/a&gt; describing BaSE can be found online.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=dHQ72po0zzM:94uCBpeLzdI:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=dHQ72po0zzM:94uCBpeLzdI:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=dHQ72po0zzM:94uCBpeLzdI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=dHQ72po0zzM:94uCBpeLzdI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/dHQ72po0zzM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 7:51:22 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3514&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Interior Prepares to Conduct Landsat 8 Scientific Programs After Successful Launch of Latest Earth-Observing Satellite]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>ClimateandLandUseChangeEarthResourcesObservationandScienceCenter ClimateandLandUseChangeLandRemoteSensing</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/7oi3Wf6i9gg/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>CA</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>SD</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NAT</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;em&gt;Secretary Salazar Says Interior-NASA Partnership Provides Model for New Strategy to Strengthen Science Education and Careers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;VANDENBERG AFB, CA &amp;ndash; &lt;!--introstart--&gt;Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today joined NASA Administrator Charles F. Bolden, Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Water and Science Anne Castle, United States Geological Survey (USGS) Director Dr. Marcia McNutt and other Interior and NASA officials to &lt;a href="http://landsat.usgs.gov/"&gt;launch the nation's newest Earth-observing satellite into space&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Launched by NASA from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, the satellite is expected to transmit images and data about the Earth within 100 days. &amp;nbsp;Landsat data from more than 3 million current and archived images of Earth &amp;ndash; available free of charge through the Interior Department&amp;rsquo;s USGS &amp;ndash; have spurred extensive research and innovations, ranging from scientific investigations around the globe to the development of applications like Google Earth.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Landsat has been delivering invaluable scientific information about our planet for more than forty years," said Salazar.&amp;nbsp; "It's an honor to be a part of today's launch to ensure that this critical data will continue to help us better understand our natural resources and help people like water managers, farmers, and resource managers make informed decisions."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Landsat is a centerpiece of NASA's Earth Science program, and today's successful launch will extend the longest continuous data record of Earth's surface as seen from space," NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said. "This data is a key tool for monitoring climate change and has led to the improvement of human and biodiversity health, energy and water management, urban planning, disaster recovery and agriculture monitoring &amp;ndash; all resulting in incalculable benefits to the U.S. and world economy."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://landsat.usgs.gov/"&gt;Landsat program&lt;/a&gt; is a joint partnership between NASA and the USGS. NASA develops the remote-sensing instruments and spacecraft, launches satellites, and validates their performance. The USGS then assumes ownership and operation of the satellites, in addition to managing ground-data reception, archiving, product generation, and distribution. The result is a long-term, impartial register of natural and human-induced changes on the global landscape.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Seeing the world from a birds-eye view has been a primal desire since the earliest days of our civilization, in order to gain a better understand of how the world operates," said Interior Assistant Secretary for Water and Science Anne Castle. "In an era of rapid world population growth, climate change, and increased competition for natural resources, we can't afford not to have the long-term, objective perspective that Landsat's eyes on the Earth provide."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a distance of more than 400 miles above the earth surface, a single Landsat scene can record the condition of hundreds of thousands of acres of grassland, agricultural crops, or forests.&amp;nbsp; Each Landsat image gives a view as broad as 12,000 square miles per scene while describing land cover in units the size of a baseball diamond.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Landsat program also offers substantial economic benefits, including an estimated $100 million per year in management of water for irrigated agriculture in western states.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Federal, state and local agencies rely on Landsat as a data source on wildfires, consumptive water use, land cover change, crop conditions, rangeland status and wildlife habitat. &amp;nbsp;Landsat images can show where vegetation is thriving and where it is stressed, where droughts are occurring, where wildland fire is a danger, and where erosion has altered coastlines or river course.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Over the last 40 years, students, land managers, scientists, relief workers, water managers, and ordinary citizens from nearly 200 nations have come to rely on Landsat as the authoritative source of unbiased information on changes in our planet's solid surface," said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. "The launch of Landsat 8, in the nick of time as Landsat 5 is decommissioned and Landsat 7 is experiencing continued hardware failures, allows us to continue to provide this vital information to the world."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Salazar today also released a new strategy to strengthen and inspire education and careers in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM). Interior's STEM strategic plan is designed to provide a five-year framework for engaging the American public&amp;mdash;particularly youth underrepresented in STEM fields&amp;mdash;to become scientifically literate stewards of our natural and cultural resources while building a future workforce that fully represents the diversity of America for the 21&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; century.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We need to make sure that there's a next generation of cutting edge scientists to design and run Landsat 9, 10, 11 and beyond," said Salazar. "This new plan will pave the way for our youth to choose the innovative and technical careers that are increasingly needed in federal service and in managing increasingly complex natural and cultural resource challenges."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;STEM careers can be found at all of Interior's nine agencies including not only USGS&amp;mdash;the nation's premier science agency in various disciplines&amp;mdash;but also the National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interior employs nearly 15,000 scientists and engineers, many of whom will be retiring in the coming decade. By emphasizing fields of study in STEM, the Department is better positioned to fill in these critical gaps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over the next five years, Interior plans to engage more partners in science education, to better coordinate access to the Department's educational resources, to engage students and other citizens in place-based learning and service opportunities, and to strengthen career training and workforce development.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.doi.gov/whatwedo/youth/education.cfm"&gt;five-year STEM plan&lt;/a&gt; is available online.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=7oi3Wf6i9gg:7Qr-2uwqbrQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=7oi3Wf6i9gg:7Qr-2uwqbrQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=7oi3Wf6i9gg:7Qr-2uwqbrQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=7oi3Wf6i9gg:7Qr-2uwqbrQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/7oi3Wf6i9gg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3510&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[U.S. Nonfuel Mineral Production Increases for Third Straight Year]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>EnergyandMineralsMineralResources MineralCommodities MineralCommodities2013 rareearth nonfuelminerals minerals Nevada</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/Jom_xkctrHk/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NAT</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;Nonfuel mineral production values increased in the United States for the third consecutive year, up $1.7 billion since 2011, the U.S. Geological Survey announced today in its Mineral Commodity Summaries 2013.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The estimated value of mineral raw materials produced at mines in the United States in 2012 was $76.5 billion, a slight increase from $74.8 billion in 2011. Net exports of mineral raw materials and old scrap contributed an additional $21 billion to the U.S. economy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The annual report from the USGS National Minerals Information Center is the earliest comprehensive source of 2012 mineral production data for the world. It includes statistics on about 90 mineral commodities essential to the U.S. economy and national security, and addresses events, trends, and issues in the domestic and international minerals industries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Minerals are the raw materials for construction, manufacturing, high technology, new industries, jobs, and ultimately economic expansion," said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. "These summaries are where Geology meets Economics, to create the complex tapestry of variations in mineral production over time and space."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The United States continues to rely on foreign sources for raw and processed mineral materials but, for the first time since 2002, the United States was not 100% import reliant for rare earths as rare earth mining resumed at Mountain Pass, California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minerals remained fundamental to the U.S. economy, contributing to the real gross domestic product (GDP) at several levels, including mining, processing, and manufacturing finished products. Minerals' contribution to the GDP increased for the second consecutive year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Decision makers and policy makers in the private and public sectors rely on the Mineral Commodity Summaries and other USGS minerals information publications as consistent and unbiased sources of information to make business decisions and national policy," said John DeYoung, Director of the USGS National Minerals Information Center.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Production and prices increased for most industrial mineral commodities mined in the United States in 2012, but production and prices for nearly all metals declined. Industrial mineral commodities include things like limestone, silica, sand and gravel, and are used for industrial purposes like building and road construction, plastics, glass, and paper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Domestic raw materials and domestically recycled materials were used to process mineral materials worth $704 billion. These mineral materials, including aluminum, brick, copper, fertilizers, and steel, and net imports of processed materials (worth about $27 billion) were, in turn, consumed by downstream industries with a value added of an estimated $2.4 trillion in 2012.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The construction industry began to show signs of improvement during 2012, with increased production and consumption of cement, construction sand and gravel, and gypsum, mineral commodities that are used almost exclusively in construction. Crushed stone production, however, continued to decline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The nonmetallic mineral products industry was boosted by the rebound in construction activity in 2012, with more than half of its output going to the construction sector. The recovery in the U.S. housing industry is fueling demand for industrial minerals and products.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mine production of 15 mineral commodities was worth more than $1 billion each in the United States in 2012. These were, in decreasing order of value, gold, crushed stone, copper, cement, construction sand and gravel, iron ore (shipped), molybdenum concentrates, phosphate rock, lime, industrial sand and gravel, soda ash, clays (all types), salt, zinc, and silver.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eleven states each produced more than $2 billion worth of nonfuel mineral commodities in 2012. These states include Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Wyoming. Nevada produced the largest value at $11.2 billion. The mineral production of these states accounted for 64 percent of the U.S. total output value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USGS Mineral Resources Program delivers unbiased science and information to understand mineral resource potential, production, consumption, and how minerals interact with the environment. The USGS National Minerals Information Center collects, analyzes, and disseminates current information on the supply of and the demand for minerals and materials in the United States and about 180 other countries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The USGS report "Mineral Commodity Summaries 2013" is available &lt;a href="http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/"&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;. Hardcopies will be available in February from the Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents. For ordering information, please call (202) 512-1800 or (866) 512-1800 or go &lt;a href="http://bookstore.gpo.gov/"&gt;online&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information on this report and individual mineral commodities, please visit the &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/"&gt;USGS National Minerals Information Center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=Jom_xkctrHk:sdEW2Rwn-GY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=Jom_xkctrHk:sdEW2Rwn-GY:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=Jom_xkctrHk:sdEW2Rwn-GY:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=Jom_xkctrHk:sdEW2Rwn-GY:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/Jom_xkctrHk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2013 7:15:09 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3506&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Upcoming Airborne Surveys To Track Potential Mineral and Water Resources in Parts of Iowa and Minnesota]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>EnergyandMineralsMineralResources GeographicAreasMidwest GeographicAreasRockyMountain</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/iixwlm5Hsco/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>IA</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MN</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;U.S. Geological Survey scientists plan to conduct the first comprehensive, high-resolution airborne survey to study the rock layers under a region of northeastern Iowa and southeastern Minnesota, starting December 2012 and lasting through January 2013.&lt;!--introend--&gt; When the data analysis is complete, resulting state-of-the-art, 3-D subsurface maps will help USGS researchers improve an assessment of mineral and water resources of the region.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As part of this research, both a low flying airplane and helicopter with auxiliary instrumentation will be used. Residents and visitors should not be alarmed to witness either of these instruments flying low to the ground near the Decorah, Iowa, and Spring Grove, Minn., region.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Modern society is critically dependent on clean water and a vast array of minerals to maintain and enhance our quality of life," said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. "The USGS uses the latest technology to find new sources of these valuable commodities, even when buried deep beneath the Earth's surface, and places that information in the public domain to benefit all Americans."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The airplane is under contract to the USGS through &lt;a href="http://bellgeospace.com/"&gt;Bell Geospace&lt;/a&gt;; the helicopter through &lt;a href="http://www.geotech.ca/"&gt;Geotech&lt;/a&gt;. The aircrafts will be operated by experienced pilots who are specially trained and approved for low-level flying. All flights are coordinated with the Federal Aviation Administration to ensure flights are in accordance with U.S. law.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The survey area is thought to be part of the 1.1 billion year old Midcontinent Rift, a major structure that stretches across much of the central United States. Rocks of the Midcontinent Rift include large volumes of mafic rocks. In the Lake Superior region, these rocks contain significant resources of nickel, copper and platinum group elements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;USGS scientists plan to use the new geophysical data to help determine if there is potential for similar resources to exist in the survey area. A secondary goal is to evaluate the geologic structure as it relates to water resources. This research is meant to study deep rocks, beneath limestone and sandstone layers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The helicopter will carry large electromagnetic and magnetic instruments from a cable underneath. A DC-3, retrofitted with modern avionics and gas turbine engines, will carry gravity gradient instruments. Because different rock types differ in their content of water, magnetic minerals, and density, the resulting geophysical maps allow visualization of the geologic structure below the surface. None of the instruments carried on the aircraft pose a health risk to people or animals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This survey will be flown in a grid pattern, by both aircraft at different times. East-west lines will be flown &amp;frac14; mile apart at elevations from 100-500 feet above the ground, and 2 &amp;frac12; miles apart in a north-south direction. All survey flights will occur during daylight hours.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Editor:&amp;nbsp; In the public interest and in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, the USGS is announcing this low-level airborne project.&amp;nbsp; Your assistance in informing the local communities is appreciated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Photos of the aircraft available upon request. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=iixwlm5Hsco:E8ElxV-l8Wk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=iixwlm5Hsco:E8ElxV-l8Wk:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=iixwlm5Hsco:E8ElxV-l8Wk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=iixwlm5Hsco:E8ElxV-l8Wk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/iixwlm5Hsco" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:41:04 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3486&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Birds at Sea and Offshore Wind Energy]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>PublicLecture ScienceInAction WindEnergy Birds SeaBirds coastalEcosystems</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/oo18CkcVdCs/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>DE</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>DC</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>ME</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MD</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>MA</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>NH</georss:featurename>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>VA</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;em&gt;Topic of Free Lecture Wednesday&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p dir="ltr"&gt;Reston, Va. &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;Offshore wind energy development and migratory birds is the topic of a free public lecture Wednesday, December 5, at 7 p.m. at the U.S. Geological Survey National Center in Reston, Va.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Titled, "Birds at Sea and Offshore Wind Energy," the lecture takes place in a federal facility and a valid photo ID is required for entry by attendees 18 years of age and older. Attendees should plan to arrive at least 15 to 20 minutes early to process through security.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For this lecture, USGS scientists Alicia Berlin and Allan O'Connell will discuss efforts to determine the potential effects of offshore wind energy development on more than 60 different sea-bird species along the Atlantic coast.&amp;nbsp; USGS collaborative research on the migratory routes and patterns of sea birds is being used to help inform decisions on potential locations of wind farms in Atlantic waters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information and directions visit the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/public_lecture_series/"&gt;Public Lecture Series website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those unable to attend the lecture in person can follow it live on Twitter @USGSLive&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These evening events are free to the public and intended to familiarize a general audience with science issues that are meaningful to their daily lives. USGS speakers are selected for their ability and enthusiasm to share their expertise with an audience that may be unfamiliar with the topic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The series provides the public an opportunity to interact with USGS scientists and ask questions about recent developments in Natural Hazards; Water; Energy Minerals and Environmental Health; Climate and Land Use Change; Ecosystems; and Core Science Systems. Ultimately, the goal is to create a better understanding of the importance and value of USGS science in action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=oo18CkcVdCs:Kwz7_O9pjmQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=oo18CkcVdCs:Kwz7_O9pjmQ:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=oo18CkcVdCs:Kwz7_O9pjmQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=oo18CkcVdCs:Kwz7_O9pjmQ:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/oo18CkcVdCs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 4 Dec 2012 11:59:28 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3472&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[Measuring Landscape Disturbance of Gas Exploration in Greene and Tioga Counties]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>ClimateandLandUseChangePennsylvaniaEnergyandMineralsandEnvironmentalHealthEnergyResources GeographicAreasNortheast</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/_vzj3K_2REg/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>PA</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="206" align="left"&gt;
&lt;tbody&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2012_11_20/new_mckean_county_tn.jpg" alt="Image from the USDA National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) from 2010. &amp;nbsp;It is located in McKean County, in northwest Pennsylvania and the scale is approximately 1:35,000." /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;&lt;span class="small"&gt;Image from the USDA National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) from 2010. &amp;nbsp;It is located in McKean County, in northwest Pennsylvania and the scale is approximately 1:35,000. (&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/images/2012_11_20/new_mckean_county.jpg"&gt;High resolution image)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RESTON, Va. &amp;mdash;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;Landscape change in Pennsylvania's Greene and Tioga counties resulting from construction of well pads, new roads and pipelines for natural gas and coalbed methane exploration is being documented to help determine the potential consequences for ecosystems and wildlife, according to a U.S. Geological Survey report released today.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;USGS researchers, using geospatial data and high resolution aerial imagery from 2004-2010, documented spatially explicit patterns of disturbance, or land use, related to natural gas resource development, such as hydraulic fracturing, particularly disturbance patterns related to well pads, roads and pipeline construction.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Spatially explicit data on the level of landscape disturbance -- which is geographic information systems data, mapped to a high degree of spatial accuracy -- is critically important to the long-term study of the potential impacts of natural gas development on human and ecological health.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The widespread use of hydraulic fracturing to produce natural gas and coalbed methane in these counties has unlocked new sources of energy, but it is also modifying the landscape at an unprecedented rate compared with other forms of energy development," said USGS Director Marcia McNutt. "The value of this study is that it documents emerging issues with a rapidly expanding practice, so that all involved in decision making can make informed choices." &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Through programs such as the National Land Cover Database, and Land Cover Trends, USGS has a long record of studying the consequences of land-use and land-cover changes. The current level of natural gas development in much of the country, and its effects on the landscape, is an important contemporary land-use/land-cover issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Large-scale landscape disturbance can have a significant impact on ecological resources and the services they provide. &amp;nbsp;This study provides a quantitative look at the levels of disturbance, forest loss and other changes to land use and land cover," said Terry Slonecker, lead author of the research.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Data from this report will be used to assess the effects of disturbance and land-cover change on wildlife, water quality, invasive species and socioeconomic impacts, among other investigations. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The study found that in Greene County, 663 natural gas extraction sites resulted in more than 775 hectares of disturbance, including 241 kilometers (149 miles) of new roads and 126 kilometers (78 miles) of new pipelines.&amp;nbsp; Disturbance in Greene County occurs mostly at the eastern side of the county with some activity at the north and south, and minor activity at the west of the county. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Tioga County, 151 natural gas extraction sites resulted in more than 362 hectares of disturbance, including 46 kilometers (28 miles) of new roads and 78 kilometers (48 miles) of new pipelines.&amp;nbsp; Disturbance in Tioga County is concentrated in the eastern half and through the central part of the county, almost in a linear fashion, in an east-west direction. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The study, "&lt;a href="http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr20121220"&gt;Landscape Consequences of Natural Gas Extraction in Greene and Tioga&amp;nbsp; Counties, Pennsylvania, 2004 to 2010&lt;/a&gt;," Open File Report 2012-1220, is the second of a series planned relating to natural gas landscape disturbance and is available online.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=_vzj3K_2REg:0PbfQO2BAVs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=_vzj3K_2REg:0PbfQO2BAVs:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=_vzj3K_2REg:0PbfQO2BAVs:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=_vzj3K_2REg:0PbfQO2BAVs:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/_vzj3K_2REg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:37:42 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3460&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
			
				
			<item>
				<title><![CDATA[The Science of Good Taste - Geology, Wine, and Food]]></title>
				<category>PR</category>
			
				<category>GeologyWine GeologyFood Food Wine agriculture viticulture PublicLectureEnergyandMineralsandEnvironmentalHealthMineralResources GeographicAreasNortheast GeographicAreasNortheast</category>
			
			
				<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~3/r3fnGH1cv7w/article.asp</link>
			
				<georss:featuretypetag>state</georss:featuretypetag>
				<georss:featurename>VA</georss:featurename>
			
						<description>&lt;h3&gt;&lt;em&gt;Topic of Free Lecture Wednesday&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;RESTON, Va.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;&lt;!--introstart--&gt;Why certain lands produce better food and wine than others is the topic of a free public lecture Wednesday, November 7, at 7 p.m. at the U.S. Geological Survey National Center in Reston, Va.&lt;!--introend--&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Titled, "The Science of Good Taste - Geology, Wine, and Food," the lecture takes place in a federal facility and a valid photo ID is required for entry by attendees 18 years of age and older. Attendees should plan to arrive at least 15 to 20 minutes early to process through security.&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For this lecture, USGS scientist Larry Meinert will address how physical factors affect viticulture and food, examining some food and wine producing areas in France, California, and Washington State.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information and directions visit the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.usgs.gov/public_lecture_series/"&gt;Public Lecture Series website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those unable to attend the lecture in person can follow it live on Twitter @USGSLive&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These evening events are free to the public and intended to familiarize a general audience with science issues that are meaningful to their daily lives. USGS speakers are selected for their ability and enthusiasm to share their expertise with an audience that may be unfamiliar with the topic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The series provides the public an opportunity to interact with USGS scientists and ask questions about recent developments in Natural Hazards; Water; Energy Minerals and Environmental Health; Climate and Land Use Change; Ecosystems; and Core Science Systems. Ultimately, the goal is to create a better understanding of the importance and value of USGS science in action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=r3fnGH1cv7w:guSeP_ej8uU:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=r3fnGH1cv7w:guSeP_ej8uU:qj6IDK7rITs"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?a=r3fnGH1cv7w:guSeP_ej8uU:gIN9vFwOqvQ"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/usgs/EnergyandMinerals?i=r3fnGH1cv7w:guSeP_ej8uU:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/usgs/EnergyandMinerals/~4/r3fnGH1cv7w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
				
				
				<pubDate>Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:39:54 EDT</pubDate>
		
				<author>OC_Web@usgs.gov (Office of Communications and Publishing)</author>
			  
			<feedburner:origLink>http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=3449&amp;from=rss</feedburner:origLink></item>
	
  </channel>
</rss>
