<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>U.S. Law Watch » Privacy</title>
	
	<link>http://www.uslawwatch.com</link>
	<description>U.S. Legal &amp; Regulatory Headlines</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:55:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/UsLawWatch/Privacy" /><feedburner:info uri="uslawwatch/privacy" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>UsLawWatch/Privacy</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Supreme Court to Review Second Circuit Decision to Find Standing in Foreign Wiretapping Challenge</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/_jOf3jYVusY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/28/privacy/supreme-court-review-circuit-decision-find-standing-foreign-wiretapping-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4433</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court agreed May 21 to review a federal circuit court's decision that plaintiffs who reasonably feared the monitoring of sensitive...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/_jOf3jYVusY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/28/privacy/supreme-court-review-circuit-decision-find-standing-foreign-wiretapping-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/28/privacy/supreme-court-review-circuit-decision-find-standing-foreign-wiretapping-challenge/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BNA INSIGHTS: Should You Ask Job Applicants or Employees for Their Social Media Passwords?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/wI3ijjQuY4k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/21/privacy/bna-insights-job-applicants-employees-social-media-passwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 08:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4413</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Many employers currently look at job applicants' public profiles on social media sites, such as Facebook, to gain insight into their character and...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/wI3ijjQuY4k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/21/privacy/bna-insights-job-applicants-employees-social-media-passwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/21/privacy/bna-insights-job-applicants-employees-social-media-passwords/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed MySpace, FTC Settlement Alleges Safe Harbor, Privacy Policy Misrepresentations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/lxZAelFb3MA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/14/privacy/proposed-myspace-ftc-settlement-alleges-safe-harbor-privacy-policy-misrepresentations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4390</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Social networking service Myspace LLC agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission claims that it misled millions of users about its privacy policies...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/lxZAelFb3MA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/14/privacy/proposed-myspace-ftc-settlement-alleges-safe-harbor-privacy-policy-misrepresentations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/14/privacy/proposed-myspace-ftc-settlement-alleges-safe-harbor-privacy-policy-misrepresentations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>States, Congress Weigh Bills to Bar Employer Demands for Passwords; Maryland Law Is Nation’s First</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/pqheHYrDAnA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/08/privacy/states-congress-weigh-bills-bar-employer-demands-passwords-maryland-law-nations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4375</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From Capitol Hill to statehouses across the country, federal and state lawmakers are scrambling to introduce legislation to bar employers, and...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/pqheHYrDAnA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/08/privacy/states-congress-weigh-bills-bar-employer-demands-passwords-maryland-law-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/05/08/privacy/states-congress-weigh-bills-bar-employer-demands-passwords-maryland-law-nations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Updates Enforcement Guidance On Employers’ Use of Criminal Histories</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/kk2A6ozb77M/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/30/privacy/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-updates-enforcement-guidance-employers-criminal-histories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Background Checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4361</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission April 25 approved updated enforcement guidance on potential discrimination resulting from employers' use...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/kk2A6ozb77M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/30/privacy/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-updates-enforcement-guidance-employers-criminal-histories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/30/privacy/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-updates-enforcement-guidance-employers-criminal-histories/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>House Passes Bill to Promote Cyber-Threat Data Sharing for Government, Private Sector</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/qqt1GR6KQZ8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/30/privacy/house-passes-bill-promote-cyberthreat-data-sharing-government-private-sector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4359</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the shadow of a veto threat, the House April 26 approved cybersecurity legislation (H.R. 3523) authored by leaders of the House Intelligence...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/qqt1GR6KQZ8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/30/privacy/house-passes-bill-promote-cyberthreat-data-sharing-government-private-sector/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/30/privacy/house-passes-bill-promote-cyberthreat-data-sharing-government-private-sector/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BNA INSIGHTS: The Federal Trade Commission’s Privacy Report: Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid Change—Five Key Takeaways</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/rvsVZzmETcs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/23/privacy/bna-insights-federal-trade-commissions-privacy-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-changefive-key-takeaways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 11:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4334</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[On March 26, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or Commission) published a landmark privacy report, Protecting Consumer Privacy in an Era of Rapid...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/rvsVZzmETcs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/23/privacy/bna-insights-federal-trade-commissions-privacy-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-changefive-key-takeaways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/23/privacy/bna-insights-federal-trade-commissions-privacy-report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-changefive-key-takeaways/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>BNA INSIGHTS: Is the Tide Turning for Plaintiffs in Privacy Class Actions?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/NBSUS58-DDI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/16/privacy/bna-insights-tide-turning-plaintiffs-privacy-class-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Breaches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4327</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The last several years have witnessed an unprecedented number of high profile data security breaches and other privacy-related mishaps, garnering...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/NBSUS58-DDI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/16/privacy/bna-insights-tide-turning-plaintiffs-privacy-class-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/16/privacy/bna-insights-tide-turning-plaintiffs-privacy-class-actions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Orders Robocallers in FTC Action To Pay Record $30 Million in Civil Penalties</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/vKiWqhFGv5s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/10/privacy/court-orders-robocallers-ftc-action-pay-record-30-million-civil-penalties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telemarketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4311</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A federal court has ordered two defendants who operated a robocall scheme to pay $30 million in civil penalties for more than 2.7 million calls...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/vKiWqhFGv5s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/10/privacy/court-orders-robocallers-ftc-action-pay-record-30-million-civil-penalties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/10/privacy/court-orders-robocallers-ftc-action-pay-record-30-million-civil-penalties/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC’s Final Report on Consumer Privacy Calls for Federal Legislation, Industry Codes</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~3/KxQxIpH5dpM/</link>
		<comments>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/02/privacy/ftcs-final-report-consumer-privacy-calls-federal-legislation-industry-codes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uslawwatch.com/?p=4293</guid>
		
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Federal Trade Commission's long-awaited final report on consumer privacy, released March 26, revealed several consequential changes in the FTC's...<br/>
<br/>
[[ Click Headline to Read Full Article ]]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UsLawWatch/Privacy/~4/KxQxIpH5dpM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/02/privacy/ftcs-final-report-consumer-privacy-calls-federal-legislation-industry-codes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.uslawwatch.com/2012/04/02/privacy/ftcs-final-report-consumer-privacy-calls-federal-legislation-industry-codes/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 73/90 queries in 0.040 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 0/0 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.uslawwatch.com @ 2012-05-28 12:58:09 -->

