<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Valuecruncher</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/valuecruncher/blog" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>New Interactive Valuation Tools From Valuecruncher</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/07/new-interactive-valuation-tools-from-valuecruncher/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/07/new-interactive-valuation-tools-from-valuecruncher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Valuecruncher]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[GOOG]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have added some new major new functionality to the Valuecruncher site.
The first thing you will notice is that we have added a lot more companies to our dataset.  We now have 8,000+ companies on the site.
The second thing you will notice is that we have added an interactive comparator (or multiple) based valuation tool [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have added some new major new functionality to the Valuecruncher site.</p>
<p>The first thing you will notice is that we have added a lot more companies to our dataset.  We now have 8,000+ companies on the site.</p>
<p>The second thing you will notice is that we have added an interactive comparator (or multiple) based valuation tool to the site.  This new interactive comparator tool allows you to complete valuation analysis of a company against a peer group across a range of changeable metrics.</p>
<p>As an example here is the <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/514">Interactive Comparator Valuation Tool for Google ($GOOG)</a>.</p>
<p>We have <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2007/05/valuecruncher-newsletter-4-comparable-company-valuations/">previously written about using comparator company valuations</a> - also called comparable company valuations. We will complete a step-by-step guide to using the tools shortly - but the <a href="http://209.20.69.22/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/valuecruncher-newsletter-31-may-2007.pdf">Valuecruncher newsletter</a> noted above gives a good overview to the broad concepts.</p>
<p>We will soon be adding the capability to change the peer group of companies. Currently the peer group is set by an algorithm and can not be changed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">Discounted cash flow  (DCF)</a> valuations are not available for all the companies in the dataset. This is because of data limitations and the relevance of the three-year DCF format for certain industries. Where they are available they are on a tab on the company page.</p>
<p>We are excited to bring you this new interactive comparator valuation tool.  We are still working through the kinks - so there are still some rough edges. We are working through those.  But we hope this tool makes more valuation analysis accessible to a wider group of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/07/new-interactive-valuation-tools-from-valuecruncher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuing The New Zealand Stock Market (NZSX) $$</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuing-the-new-zealand-stock-market-nzsx-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuing-the-new-zealand-stock-market-nzsx-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NZX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the spirit of The Economist’s “Big Mac Index“.  Here at Valuecruncher we decided to repeat an exercise we did earlier in the year - to assess the overall  current valuation of the New Zealand stock exchange (NZSX) - the market as a whole.  Our objective was to assess whether the overall market might be over- [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the spirit of <a href="http://www.economist.com/">The Economist’s</a> “<a href="http://www.economist.com/markets/bigmac/index.cfm">Big Mac Index</a>“.  Here at Valuecruncher we decided to repeat an exercise <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/03/valuing-the-new-zealand-stock-market-nzsx/">we did earlier in the year</a> - to assess the overall  current valuation of the New Zealand stock exchange (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzsx">NZSX</a>) - the market as a whole.  Our objective was to assess whether the overall market might be over- or undervalued.</p>
<p>To do this we took a simplified approach.  At Valuecruncher we have <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies?indice=5">completed valuations for 36 of the NZX50 companies</a>.  Four of these companies are not NZ-based so we eliminated them and we have a crazy number coming out of Nuplex ($NPX.NZ) so we also eliminated them.  That leaves us with 31 companies.  These 31 companies have a market capitalisation of NZ$31.8 billion - this represents just over 70% of the <a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzsx">NZSX total market capitalisation of NZ$44.5 billion</a>.  We took these 31 companies and compared our valuations to the current share price - determining a percentage under- or overvalued.  We then weighted these percentages by the market capitalisation of the 31 companies.  By summing these weighted averages we came up with an estimate of the valuation of the New Zealand market.</p>
<p>Based on our sample of 31 companies - representing just over 70% of the total NZSX market capitalisation.  Valuecruncher estimates that the New Zealand stock exchange is undervalued by just under 3%.  Valuecruncher is saying that overall the market looks slightly cheap.  Our numbers are included in the table below.</p>
<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-770" href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuing-the-new-zealand-stock-market-nzsx-2/vc_market/"></a><a rel="attachment wp-att-770" href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuing-the-new-zealand-stock-market-nzsx-2/vc_market/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-770" title="vc_market" src="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/vc_market.gif" alt="vc_market" width="564" height="627" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuing-the-new-zealand-stock-market-nzsx-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What To Buy On The NZX - New Zealand Stock Exchange $$</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/what-to-buy-on-the-nzx-new-zealand-stock-exchange-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/what-to-buy-on-the-nzx-new-zealand-stock-exchange-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Methven]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NZX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rakon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sky City]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sky TV]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steel & Tube]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MVN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[RAK]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SKC.NZ]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SKT.NZ]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[STU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Valuecruncher we have just completed our most recent review of NZX companies in our dataset.  This involves a review of the assumptions we are using in the valuations. We use consensus analyst estimates as the basis of our assumptions.  For example - consensus analyst estimates of revenues for New Zealand’s largest listed company Telecom [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Valuecruncher we have just completed our most recent review of <a href="http://www.nzx.com/">NZX</a> companies in our dataset.  This involves a review of the assumptions we are using in the valuations. We use consensus analyst estimates as the basis of our assumptions.  For example - <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/estimates?symbol=TEL.NZ#consensus">consensus analyst estimates of revenues for New Zealand’s largest listed company Telecom New Zealand</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/TEL">$TEL.NZ</a>).  Valuecruncher uses these numbers and our own assessments of other valuation assumptions such as the <a href="../2008/06/discount-rates-a-combination-of-science-and-art/">discount rate</a> and <a href="../2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/">terminal growth rate</a>.</p>
<p>At Valuecruncher we then pull all of these variables together and place a valuation on the shares of the companies in our data-set and provide a recommendation.  You can either simply look at our valuations - or for all the experts out there, you can change the assumptions we have used and modify the valuation.  Modified valuations can be saved and shared.</p>
<p>With the completion of our monthly review of the companies on the <a href="http://www.nzx.com/">NZX</a> (New Zealand stock exchange) we decided to outline what we at Valuecruncher see as the most undervalued (the best buys).</p>
<p>We should note that you can always find <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/buy?indice=5">a list of the Valuecruncher buy recommendations for the NZX</a> from the most undervalued using our filters.  The following list highlights the top five buys based on the latest review of the valuation assumptions.</p>
<p><strong>Valuecruncher’s Top Five Buys On The NZX - June 2009</strong></p>
<p><strong>Number 1<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.rakon.com/">Rakon</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzsx/RAK">$RAK.NZ</a>) is a New Zealand-based designer and manufacturer of high-performance frequency control technology. Valuecruncher currently values $RAK.NZ at NZ$1.87 - 24% above the current share price.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/940">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $RAK.NZ</a></p>
<p><strong>Number 2</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.skytv.co.nz/">Sky Network Television</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/SKT">$SKT.NZ</a>) is a provider of pay and free-to-air television services in New Zealand.  Valuecruncher currently values $SKT.NZ at NZ$5.156 - 22% above the current share price.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1031">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $SKT.NZ</a></p>
<p><strong>Number 3</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.skycityentertainmentgroup.com/">Sky City</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/SKC">$SKC.NZ</a>) is a New Zealand-listed gaming, hotel and entertainment company.  Valuecruncher currently values $SKC.NZ at NZ$3.19 - 20% above the current share price.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1030">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $SKC.NZ</a></p>
<p><strong>Number 4</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.methven.biz/">Methven</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzsx/MVN">$MVN.NZ</a>) is a New Zealand company that designs and supplies taps and shower-ware.  Valuecruncher currently values $MVN.NZ at NZ$1.65 - 20% above the current share price.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/757">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $MVN.NZ</a></p>
<p><strong>Number 5</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.steelandtube.co.nz/page/home.aspx">Steel &amp; Tube</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/STU">$STU.NZ</a>) is a New Zealand-based steel and industrial products company.  Valuecruncher currently values $STU.NZ at NZ$3.29 - 13% above the current share price.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/1066">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $STU.NZ</a></p>
<p>Those are our top five buys for June 2009.  You can also always find <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/sell?indice=5">a list of the Valuecruncher <span style="text-decoration: underline;">sell</span> recommendations for the NZX</a> from most overvalued up using our filters.</p>
<p>Disclosure: None</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/what-to-buy-on-the-nzx-new-zealand-stock-exchange-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running The Numbers - Where is Apple ($AAPL) At?</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-where-is-apple-aapl-at/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-where-is-apple-aapl-at/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AAPL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At Valuecruncher we have not looked at Apple ($AAPL) since late last year. $AAPL is now trading at US$136.09. We felt it was time to revisit the valuation of $AAPL from an intrinsic value perspective - and most importantly the assumptions that we are using in our valuation.
Valuecruncher interactive analyst report for $AAPL
Valuecruncher produces a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Valuecruncher we have not looked at Apple ($AAPL) since <a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2008/12/running-the-numbers-apple-aapl/">late last year</a>. $AAPL is now trading at US$136.09. We felt it was time to revisit the valuation of $AAPL from an intrinsic value perspective - and most importantly the assumptions that we are using in our valuation.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">Valuecruncher interactive analyst report for $AAPL</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Valuecruncher produces a valuation of US$140.57 for $AAPL. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 3.3% above the current share price of US$136.09.  $AAPL appears reasonably valued at the moment.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Assumptions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Revenue</strong>: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/estimates?symbol=AAPL.O#consensus">Reuters aggregates 32 analysts covering $AAPL</a> and the mean estimates of 2009 and 2010 revenues are US$35.5 billion and US$41.4 billion respectively. For our analysis we have used US$35.5 billion in 2009, US$41.25 billion in 2010 and US$47.0 billion in 2011.</li>
<li><strong>Profitability</strong>: We have used an EBITDA margin of 20.5% to 2011.  <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/ratios?symbol=AAPL.O#profitability">Reuters has $AAPL‘s EBITD margin</a> at 21.4% last year and an average of 16.8% over the last five-years.</li>
<li><strong>Capital Expenditure</strong>: We have assumed capital expenditures of US$1.0 billion in 2009, US$1.15 billion in 2010 then US$1.25 billion per annum moving forward.</li>
<li><a href="../2008/12/2008/10/2008/06/discount-rates-a-combination-of-science-and-art/">Discount Rate</a>: 10.0%.</li>
<li><a href="../2008/12/2008/10/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/">Terminal Growth Rate</a>: 4.5%. In our assumptions we have 2010/11 revenue growth at 13.9% - we have assumed that growth eventually slows to a 3.5% long-term stable growth rate.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our analysis incorporates the cash on the $AAPL balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/82">Play with our assumptions</a> – what does your analysis say?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Disclosure: None<a href="http://www.findata.co.nz/Markets/StockQuote/NASDAQ/AAPL.htm"><br />
<img style="border: 0px solid black; width: 560px; height: 500px;" src="http://chart.findata.co.nz/?e=NASDAQ&amp;s=AAPL&amp;p=D&amp;n=365&amp;w=560&amp;h=500&amp;vol=1&amp;bs=Close&amp;v=0" alt="" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-where-is-apple-aapl-at/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running The Numbers - Air New Zealand ($AIR.NZ)</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-air-new-zealand-airnz-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-air-new-zealand-airnz-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Air New Zealand]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NZX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[AIR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Air New Zealand ($AIR.NZ) is an international and domestic airline based in New Zealand.  $AIR.NZ is currently trading at NZ$1.03.  How is this in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?
Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report for $AIR.NZ
Valuecruncher produces a valuation of NZ$1.15 for $AIR.NZ. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/aboutus/default.htm">Air New Zealand</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/AIR">$AIR.NZ</a>) is an international and domestic airline based in New Zealand.  $AIR.NZ is currently trading at NZ$1.03.  How is this in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/33">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report for $AIR.NZ</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Valuecruncher produces a valuation of NZ$1.15 for $AIR.NZ. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 11.7% above the current share price of NZ$1.03.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our analysis incorporates the cash and debt on the $AIR.NZ balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/33">Play with our assumptions</a> – what does your analysis say?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Disclosure: None<a href="http://www.findata.co.nz/Markets/StockQuote/NZX/AIR.htm"><br />
<img style="border: 0px solid black; width: 560px; height: 500px;" src="http://chart.findata.co.nz/?e=NZX&amp;s=AIR&amp;p=D&amp;n=365&amp;w=560&amp;h=500&amp;vol=1&amp;bs=Close&amp;v=0" alt="" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-air-new-zealand-airnz-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running The Numbers - Fisher &amp; Paykel Appliances ($FPA.NZ)</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-fisher-paykel-appliances-fpanz-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-fisher-paykel-appliances-fpanz-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[FP Appliances]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NZX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[FPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fisher &#38; Paykel Appliances ($FPA.NZ) is a New Zealand-based designer, manufacturer and marketer of household appliances.  The company has just completed a major recapitalisation. The current share price is NZ$0.69.   How is this in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?
Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $FPA.NZ
Valuecruncher produces a valuation of NZ$0.67 for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fisherpaykel.com/global/about-us/who-we-are.cfm">Fisher &amp; Paykel Appliances</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/FPA">$FPA.NZ</a>) is a New Zealand-based designer, manufacturer and marketer of household appliances.  The company has <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&amp;objectid=10575836">just completed a major recapitalisation</a>. The current share price is NZ$0.69.   How is this in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/453">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $FPA.NZ</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Valuecruncher produces a valuation of NZ$0.67 for $FPA.NZ. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 2.9% below the current share price of NZ$0.69.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Assumptions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Revenue</strong>: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/estimates?symbol=FPA.NZ#consensus">Reuters aggregates seven analysts</a> covering $FPA.NZ and this produces mean estimates of 2010 and 2011 revenues of NZ$1.355 billion and NZ$1.356 billion respectively. For our analysis we have used NZ$1.350 billion in 2010, NZ$1.350 billion in 2011 and NZ$1.375 billion in 2012.</li>
<li><strong>Profitability</strong>: We have used a flat EBITDA margin of 10.5% in 2010 then 12.0% for 2011 and beyond. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/ratios?symbol=FPA.NZ#profitability">Reuters has $FPA.NZ‘s EBITD margin</a> at an average of 9.88% over the last five-years.</li>
<li><strong>Capital Expenditure</strong>: We have assumed capital expenditures of NZ$50.0 million per annum moving forward.</li>
<li><a href="../category/category/2008/06/discount-rates-a-combination-of-science-and-art/">Discount Rate</a>: 8.5%.<span> </span>The <a href="http://www.pwc.com/Extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/748F5814D61CC2618525693A007EC870">PwC New Zealand cost of capital report</a> has $FPA.NZ at a WACC of 7.5% with the wider NZ market at 8.3%.</li>
<li><a href="../category/category/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/">Terminal Growth Rate</a>: 3.0%.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our analysis incorporates the cash and debt the $FPH.NZ balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/453">Play with our assumptions</a> – what does your analysis say?</p>
<p>Disclosure: None<a href="http://www.findata.co.nz/Markets/StockQuote/NZX/FPA.htm"><br />
<img style="border: 0px solid black; width: 560px; height: 500px;" src="http://chart.findata.co.nz/?e=NZX&amp;s=FPA&amp;p=D&amp;n=365&amp;w=560&amp;h=500&amp;vol=1&amp;bs=Close&amp;v=0" alt="" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-fisher-paykel-appliances-fpanz-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuecruncher at Finovate (Video)</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuecruncher-at-finovate-video/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuecruncher-at-finovate-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Valuecruncher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In late April Valuecruncher was one of the companies that presented at the FinovateStartup09 conference in San Francisco. It was a great event and showcased some interesting companies in the finance space.
There are videos of all the presenting companies up on the Finovate site. This includes one for Valuecruncher.
Enjoy.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In late April Valuecruncher was one of the companies that presented at the <a href="http://finovate.com/startup09/index.html">FinovateStartup09</a> conference in San Francisco. It was a great event and showcased some interesting companies in the finance space.</p>
<p>There are <a href="http://finovate.com/startup09/presenters.html">videos of all the presenting companies</a> up on the Finovate site. This includes one for <a href="http://finovate.com/startup09vid/valuecruncher.html">Valuecruncher</a>.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/valuecruncher-at-finovate-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running The Numbers - Methven ($MVN.NZ)</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-methven-mvnnz-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-methven-mvnnz-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 08:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Methven]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NZX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MVN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Methven ($MVN.NZ) is a New Zealand company that designs and supplies taps and shower-ware.  $MVN.NZ has risen over 30% since hitting a low of NZ$0.97 in March. $MVN.NZ is currently trading at NZ$1.30.  How is this in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?
Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report for $MVN.NZ
Valuecruncher produces a valuation of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.methven.biz/">Methven</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/nzsx/MVN">$MVN.NZ</a>) is a New Zealand company that designs and supplies taps and shower-ware.  $MVN.NZ has risen over 30% since hitting a low of NZ$0.97 in March. $MVN.NZ is currently trading at NZ$1.30.  How is this in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/757">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report for $MVN.NZ</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Valuecruncher produces a valuation of NZ$1.67 for $MVN.NZ. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 28.5% above the current share price of NZ$1.30.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Assumptions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Revenue</strong>: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/estimates?symbol=MVN.NZ#consensus">Reuters aggregates four analysts covering $MVN.NZ</a> and the mean estimates of 2010 and 2011 revenues are NZ$141.6 million and NZ$146.1 million respectively. For our analysis we have used NZ$145.0 million in 2010, NZ$150.0 million in 2011 and NZ$155.0 million in 2012.</li>
<li><strong>Profitability</strong>: We have used a flat EBITDA margin of 14.0% to 2012. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/ratios?symbol=MVN.NZ#profitability">Reuters don’t list an EBITD margin</a> for $MVN.NZ.</li>
<li><strong>Capital Expenditure</strong>: We have assumed capital expenditures of NZ$3.0 million per annum moving forward.</li>
<li><a href="../2008/10/2008/06/discount-rates-a-combination-of-science-and-art/">Discount Rate</a>: 11.0%.<span> </span>The <a href="http://www.pwc.com/Extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/748F5814D61CC2618525693A007EC870">PwC New Zealand cost of capital report</a> does not list $MVN.NZ but has the wider market at 8.3%. We believe a discount rate in the 10-12% range is appropriate. We have chosen the middle of this range.</li>
<li><a href="../2008/10/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/">Terminal Growth Rate</a>: 2.0%.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our analysis incorporates the cash and debt on the $MVN.NZ balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/757">Play with our assumptions</a> – what does your analysis say?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Disclosure: None<a href="http://www.findata.co.nz/Markets/StockQuote/NZX/MVN.htm"><br />
<img style="border: 0px solid black; width: 560px; height: 500px;" src="http://chart.findata.co.nz/?e=NZX&amp;s=MVN&amp;p=D&amp;n=365&amp;w=560&amp;h=500&amp;vol=1&amp;bs=Close&amp;v=0" alt="" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/06/running-the-numbers-methven-mvnnz-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running The Numbers - NZX Limited ($NZX.NZ)</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/05/running-the-numbers-nzx-limited-nzxnz/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/05/running-the-numbers-nzx-limited-nzxnz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 05:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NZX]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NZX Limited]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been a busy few months for the operator of the New Zealand share market - NZX Limited ($NZX.NZ).  We have seen the sale of the TZ1 registry business.  A good financial result.  Three separate acquisitions.  And finally details of a capital raise to fund the acquisitions.   $NZX.NZ is trading at NZ$8.30.  This is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a busy few months for the operator of the New Zealand share market - <a href="http://www.nzx.com/">NZX Limited</a> (<a href="http://www.nzx.com/markets/NZSX/NZX">$NZX.NZ</a>).  We have seen <a href="http://www.tz1market.com/newspress.php?id=62">the sale of the TZ1 registry business</a>.  A good <a href="http://www.nzx.com/about_nzx/nzx_updates/4906755">financial result</a>.  <a href="http://www.nzx.com/about_nzx/nzx_updates/4893429">Three</a> <a href="http://www.nzx.com/about_nzx/nzx_updates/4907542">separate</a> <a href="http://www.nzx.com/about_nzx/nzx_updates/4914057">acquisitions</a>.  And finally details of <a href="http://www.nzx.com/about_nzx/nzx_updates/4914088">a capital raise</a> to fund the acquisitions.   $NZX.NZ is trading at NZ$8.30.  This is just below the 52-week high for $NZX.NZ of NZ$8.40.  We decided to have a look at the current share price in relation to the intrinsic value of the company’s shares?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/804">Valuecruncher Interactive Analyst Report For $NZX.NZ</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Valuecruncher produces a valuation of NZ$9.33 for $NZX.NZ. This is a current valuation (an estimate of intrinsic value using a <a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/static/dcf">discounted cash flow</a> model) not a target price. This valuation is 12.4% above the current share price of NZ$8.30.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Assumptions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Revenue</strong>: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/estimates?symbol=NZX.NZ#consensus">Reuters aggregates four analysts covering $NZX.NZ</a> and these produce mean estimates of 2009 and 2010 revenues of NZ$36.3 million and NZ$42.6 million respectively. For our analysis we have used NZ$36.0 million in 2009, NZ$42.0 million in 2010 and NZ$46.0 million in 2011.</li>
<li><strong>Profitability</strong>: We have used an EBITDA margin of 52.0% in 2009 dropping to 50.0% in 2010 and beyond. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/ratios?symbol=NZX.NZ#profitability">Reuters has $NZX.NZ‘s EBITD margin</a> at 51.8% last year and an average of 42.3% over the last five-years.</li>
<li><strong>Capital Expenditure</strong>: We have assumed capital expenditures of NZ$2.0 million per annum moving forward.</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/04/category/2008/06/discount-rates-a-combination-of-science-and-art/">Discount Rate</a>: 10.5%.<span> </span>The <a href="http://www.pwc.com/Extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/748F5814D61CC2618525693A007EC870">PwC New Zealand cost of capital report</a> has $NZX.NZ at a WACC of 11.1% with the wider NZ market at 8.3%.</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/04/category/2008/06/estimating-terminal-growth-rates/">Terminal Growth Rate</a>: 3.8%.  We have assumed our 9.5% growth between 2010 and 2011 gradually decreases to a stable long-term growth rate of 3%.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our analysis incorporates the cash on the $NZX.NZ balance sheet – Valuecruncher calculates a net debt number.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.valuecruncher.com/companies/804">Play with our assumptions</a> – what does your analysis say?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Disclosure: None</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.findata.co.nz/Markets/StockQuote/NZX/NZX.htm"> <img style="border: 0px solid black; width: 560px; height: 500px;" src="http://chart.findata.co.nz/?e=NZX&amp;s=NZX&amp;p=D&amp;n=365&amp;w=560&amp;h=500&amp;vol=1&amp;bs=Close&amp;v=0" alt="" /><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/05/running-the-numbers-nzx-limited-nzxnz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valuecruncher at FinovateStarup09</title>
		<link>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/05/valuecruncher-at-finovatestarup09/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/05/valuecruncher-at-finovatestarup09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Crunch</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Valuecruncher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.valuecruncher.com/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Valuecruncher was at FinovateStartup09 this week in San Francisco.
It was a great event for Valuecruncher.  We met some really interesting people and got to show off what we are doing to a smart connected crowd. We recorded a formal video there which we will link to when it is up on the Finovate site.  But [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valuecruncher was at <a href="http://www.finovate.com/startup09/presenters.html">FinovateStartup09</a> this week in San Francisco.</p>
<p>It was a great event for Valuecruncher.  We met some really interesting people and got to show off what we are doing to a smart connected crowd. We recorded a formal video there which we will link to when it is up on the Finovate site.  But here are some other links and thoughts for now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.banktastic.com/">Banktastic</a> were providing coverage of the conference and they <a href="http://www.banktastic.com/">captured Mark Clare giving a demo of the Valuecruncher service</a> to an attendee.</p>
<p>Mark Clare spent some time talking to <a href="http://www.mbablogs.businessweek.com/WhatTheyDontTeachYouAtBusinessSchool">Larry Chiang from BusinessWeek</a>.  Larry asked what were the three things he learned at Finovate that he did not learn at business school (the name of his column).  Here is his three - enjoy:</p>
<ol>
<li>To be a successful personal finance management (PFM in the lingo) site you need to have grass on your home page – examples <a href="http://www.mint.com/">Mint</a> and <a href="http://rudder.com/">Rudder</a> (HT: <a href="http://www.lendingkarma.com/">LendingKarma</a>).</li>
<li>Speaking of <a href="http://www.lendingkarma.com/">LendingKarma</a>. Even without the MBA I know that <a href="http://www.lendingkarma.com/">LendingKarma</a> and <a href="http://www.creditkarma.com/">CreditKarma</a> (both participants at <a href="http://www.finovate.com/startup09/presenters.html">FinovateStartup09</a>) should merge for the name synergies alone.</li>
<li>That there are sure are a lot of you “English” guys around.  I am from New Zealand.  Literally <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/">the other side</a> of <a href="http://maps.google.co.nz/">the world</a>.</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.valuecruncher.com/2009/05/valuecruncher-at-finovatestarup09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
