<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Value Stock Guide</title>
	
	<link>http://valuestockguide.com</link>
	<description>Value Investing Advice, Research and Stock Picks Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ValueStockGuide" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="valuestockguide" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>7 Potentially Undervalued Stocks With Low P/E</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/7-potentially-undervalued-stocks-with-low-pe/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/7-potentially-undervalued-stocks-with-low-pe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oplk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rbcn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Price to Earnings ratio provides a useful indicator of valuation. While one should never rely on just one indicator to make investment decisions, this is a good starting point to find stocks to buy, specially when it is paired with other filters. In this screen, in addition to a Price to Earnings multiple below 15, [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Price to Earnings ratio provides a useful indicator of valuation. While one should never rely on just one indicator to make investment decisions, this is a good starting point to find <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stocks-to-buy/">stocks to buy</a>, specially when it is paired with other filters.</p>
<p>In this screen, in addition to a Price to Earnings multiple below 15, I have also considered the earnings growth rate, both past and projected, profitability and kept the screening to stocks with market caps greater than $50 million but less than $1 Billion. This gives us a list of companies that are potentially undervalued with good earnings growth. As is normally the case at Value Stock Guide, I prefer to focus on small cap stocks.</p>
<p>This is a Level 1 screen, which means further diligence is needed before any of these stocks can really be considered a candidate for investment.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Rubicon Technologies (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=RBCN">RBCN</a>)</strong> – Rubicon Technologies is a semiconductor company that manufactures crystalline products for opto-electronic applications (LEDS, RFICs, Laser diodes, etc). The Illinois based company stock trades at 4.53 P/E ratio and 1.19 Price to Book. The stock commands a $227 market value, and is down over 17% today as it reported an earnings miss and a weak outlook next quarter due to excess inventory in the LED supply chain. This may be a great time to get in the stock on weakness and wait for the inventory glut to work itself out.</p>
<p>2. <strong>BRT Realty Trust (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BRT">BRT</a>)</strong> – BRT Realty Trust is a REIT that invests in mortgage loans secured by commercial and multifamily real estate properties. The company is based out of Great Neck, NY. The stock trades at a PE ratio of 8.49 and a P/B ratio of 0.66. The dividend history is spotty, but the trust is profitable and a lot of the investment thesis depends on your assessment of the risk in the mortgage loan portfolio the trust holds.</p>
<p>3. <strong>Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ISSI">ISSI</a></strong>) – ISSI is a fabless semiconductor company that designs and markets memory chips for various consumer applications. The stock currently trades at a PE ratio of 5.89 and a P/B ratio of 1.23, which is quite good. The stock is currently weak as the semiconductor industry stays weak. The $295 million market value is supported by $95 million in cash on the books. With no debt, the company has a balance sheet to weather the current storm and should be a good investment at current prices.</p>
<p>4. <strong>Perion Network Ltd (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PERI">PERI</a>)</strong> – Formerly known as IncrediMail, the company is based out of Israel and provides email software products and other various social expression products for home and consumer markets. The company is profitable, with a P/E ratio of 7.44. The company expects a revenue growth of more than 30% in 2012 so it is worth to keep an eye on the stock.</p>
<p>5. <strong>Oplink Communication (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=OPLK">OPLK</a>)</strong> – The $340 million market value semiconductor company makes and sells optical networking components worldwide. The trailing P/E ratio of 10.55 and the forward P/E ratio of 18.83 should be adjusted with the excess cash the company has on the books in the amount of $174 million. In a soft market for its products, it is wise to gravitate towards companies that sport a strong balance sheet.</p>
<p>6. <strong>Transglobe Energy Corp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TGA">TGA</a></strong>) – TGA is an oil exploration and production company from Calgary, Canada with interests in Egypt and Yemen. The stock is priced at 14.82 P/E giving it a market value of $812 million. This could be an interesting stock for investors looking for energy exposure.</p>
<p>7. <strong>Fairpoint Communications (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FRP">FRA</a>)</strong> &#8211; FairPoint Communications, Inc. provides communication services to residential and business customers in rural and small urban communities primarily in northern New England. Its services include local and long distance telephone, broadband access, and television. The company is currently valued at $114 million at a PE ratio on 1.1 and a Price to Book multiple of 0.67. The company does have high debt load and has been unprofitable for years but had significant tangible assets so it can make for an interesting value investing study.</p>
<p>Many of these companies are undergoing issues that have depressed their stock. In some cases, these problems may be temporary, in which case these prices may just yield some terrific <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stock-picks/">stock picks</a>. In some other cases, there may be a fundamental problem with the business in which case a greater deep dive is required. Even a distressed company may be a good investment if the liquidation value exceeds the current market value, so it is always a good idea to investigate these stocks further.</p>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=bYL0fcSsnaw:MOVbCBlf0Lk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/7-potentially-undervalued-stocks-with-low-pe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Nature of Risk in Value Investing – Not the Same as Volatility</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/the-nature-of-risk-in-value-investing-not-the-same-as-volatility/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/the-nature-of-risk-in-value-investing-not-the-same-as-volatility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 20:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Held long enough, the price of a security approximates its value. Buying overvalued stocks in most cases deliver lackluster performance as the value struggles to catch up with the price. The price may decline, or if the business is growing value at a rapid pace, than perhaps there may be some price appreciation. Regardless, there [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Held long enough, the price of a security approximates its value.</p>
<ul>
<li>Buying <strong>overvalued stocks</strong> in most cases deliver lackluster performance as the value struggles to catch up with the price. The price may decline, or if the business is growing value at a rapid pace, than perhaps there may be some price appreciation. Regardless, there is a better way to invest with less risk and more rewards</li>
<li>Buying <strong>undervalued stocks</strong>, in most cases deliver outstanding performance over time as the price rises to catch up with the value – as long as the business continues to create value over time</li>
</ul>
<p>The critical phrase here is “held long enough”. We will discuss “risk” with this as a backdrop. For investors who are essentially short term investors, looking for a quick profit, the value in the business does not matter much. When investing is not based on the underlying business fundamentals, it quickly becomes speculation. And speculation is notoriously hard way to create long term wealth on any sustained basis.</p>
<h3>So What is Risk?</h3>
<p>Quite simply, risk is the possibility that the investment does not work out well. In some cases, you might have to wait longer than expected for the value to be realized. In other cases, you may even experience a loss of capital.</p>
<p>This can happen for a number of reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>You make a mistake in building the investment thesis for the stock</strong> – Value investing is more art than science. Mistakes can happen. You might over estimate the value of an asset, or under estimate the level of distress on the business. Or you just might have a misplaced decimal point in your spreadsheet. While it is essential to be as thorough as possible during the due diligence period, and lean on the conservative side, it is fool hardy to believe that the possibility of a mistake does not exist.</li>
<li><strong>The market continues to stay irrational on the security</strong> – Ever <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stocks-to-buy/">buy a stock</a> that you think is a terrific value, and two years later, the stock is still a terrific value? I have. Although the stock has returned a quite respectable gain in these 2 years, the undervaluation persists. Some of the other stocks may be even less fortunate and the price might barely budge for years, even as the company fundamentals continue to improve.</li>
<li><strong>Future may turn out to be different when you reach there</strong> – Value investors try to protect against the uncertain future by paying more attention to the assets and asset quality and less credence to the earnings projections. There are still other ways your investment thesis may trip up. Economic conditions may change. Competition may intensify. FDA approvals may be withheld. Management may turn out to be corrupt. </li>
</ul>
<h3>How do you Protect Against these Risks?</h3>
<p>The simplest way to protect against the risks that you may not even know exist, is to demand a healthy discount to value of the security you are buying. Also called “margin of safety”, a typical 30%-40% discount to the intrinsic value is a good protection against unknowns and your own mistakes in your analysis. In cases where the business has significant risks that are KNOWN, it may still be a terrific investment if you can buy the stock at a greater margin of safety. There are very few sure things in investing and the goal is to maximize your returns adjusted for risk. Sometimes, you may have to take some calculated risks when the potential rewards justify it. To protect your downside, a margin of safety approaching 80% or more may be required <em>(subscribe to my stock newsletter and I will email you an example).</em></p>
<p>All this assumes that you are researching and analyzing the business of the company and its fundamentals before you make the buy decision. Not knowing the business you are investing in exposes you to another type of risk. The stock may indeed be a great investment, but you may not be able to realize the profits if you miss the red flags that might appear in the future.</p>
<h3>Risk is Not the Same as Volatility</h3>
<p>If you have done your homework on your stock picks and are very confident in your research, and the company continues to execute in a way that affirms your thesis, why should you care if the stock price continues to go up or down on a daily basis. Daily stock fluctuations merely reflect the daily demand and supply of the shares, which for small cap stocks that are less liquid may be extreme. Have the patience to wait for the market to catch up with the value, which it will over time.</p>
<p>That being said, volatility does create opportunities to increase your stake in the company. If the business is truly undervalued, any opportunity to increase ownership should be welcome.</p>
<p>On the flip side, it is quite possible that a stock may hit your valuation target on a short term upswing. In cases like this, there is no reason to not liquidate your position if you can. Taking profits early is always better. You can redeploy your capital in other more undervalued assets. I always go in a new investment with a target sell price and put in a GTC limit order to sell at that price. Sometimes, I may revise the target price up or down depending on how the company performs in the future. This is not the same as a short term speculation strategy. The difference is that you know what you are doing.</p>
<p>A disciplined buy and sell strategy and the commitment to stick with it is essential to manage your risk. It is altogether too easy to get carried away with “momentum” and “hype” when the stock price is on the rise. Emotions and sentiments should play no role in your investing.</p>
<p>With this being said, you should get in the habit of reading Wall Street’s reports and ignoring their recommendations. More on this later!</p>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=RR8IFQOefas:r_OKEP375Tk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/the-nature-of-risk-in-value-investing-not-the-same-as-volatility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 Small Cap Stocks Undervalued by the Balance Sheet</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/8-small-cap-stocks-undervalued-by-the-balance-sheet/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/8-small-cap-stocks-undervalued-by-the-balance-sheet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ahc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bncn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kbalb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kcli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plfe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sbx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Often small cap companies see their stock price languishing in the bargain bin. These stocks may be under followed, or perhaps investors have given up on the stock waiting for the market to realize their value. These can be great stocks for a patient investor to buy into at the right price and wait for [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Often small cap companies see their stock price languishing in the bargain bin. These stocks may be under followed, or perhaps investors have given up on the stock waiting for the market to realize their value. These can be great stocks for a patient investor to buy into at the right price and wait for the valuation to improve.</p>
<p>The following 8 small cap stocks are potentially undervalued based on their balance sheet strength. They have been picked for low Price/Book value, low levels of debt and a dividend. Some of these may be having temporary profitability issues, or there may be other reasons why the stock price may be distressed. It is always a good idea to dig deeper and review the business before deciding to commit any funds to the stock. Existence of a dividend does imply a certain confidence by the management of the future prospects of the company and its cash flow.</p>
<p><strong>1. The Street, Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TST">TST</a>):</strong> The Street, Inc is a digital financial media company and owns sites such as thestreet.com, stockpickr, mainstreet and bankingmyway. The company monetizes its content through advertisements and subscription services. It also syndicates its content through other online news sources. The company has a market value of $59 million and a P/B ratio of 0.66. It has $62 million in cash and no debt. It pays a 5.40% dividend.</p>
<p><strong>2. A. H. Belo (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AHC">AHC</a>):</strong> Newspaper publishers have not fared well with the advent of internet. AH Belo owns Dallas Morning News and other papers. But it also owns sites such as cars.com, apartments.com and homegain.com. Additionally, it owns real estate through its Belo Investments subsidiary. The company sports a market value of $123 million, and trades at 0.68 times book value. Zero debt, a 4.1% dividend yield and $46 million in cash on hand makes AHC a stock that you should look at.</p>
<p><strong>3. Kansas City Life Insurance (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KCLI">KCLI</a>):</strong> Kansas City Life Insurance company provides various life and healthy insurance products and annuities in 48 US states and District of Columbia. The stock yields 3.1% in dividends. It has a P/E ratio of 14.4 and a P/B ratio of 0.54 and is sitting on $47 million in cash, which is nice for a $390 million market cap company.</p>
<p><strong>4. BNC Bancorp (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BNCN">BNCN</a>):</strong> This $70 million market cap company operates Bank of North Carolina out of High Point, NC with banking centers in North and South Carolina. The stock appears cheap at 60% of the book value. It also offers a 2.7% dividend.</p>
<p><strong>5. Gaiam Inc (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GAIA">GAIA</a>):</strong> Gaiam is a lifestyle media company that offers personal development, ecological and wellness information and products through catalogs, internet, retain and direct response television. It also offers design, consultation and installation of solar energy systems. The company is valued at 0.55 times book value and has $24 million in cash (net of debt). Its market value is about $80 million.</p>
<p><strong>6. Presidential Life Corporation (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PLFE">PLFE</a>):</strong> President Life offers various life, accident and health insurance products and annuities. At 8.9 P/E and 0.43 P/B, the stock appears to be significantly undervalued. The stock has a $347 million market cap and kicks out a 2.1% dividend. The company also has $149 million in cash on the books. Definitely worth a look.</p>
<p><strong>7. Kimball International (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KBALB">KBALB</a>):</strong> The $243 million market cap company, Kimball operates in two unrelated segments. It manufactures and sells electronic assemblies (circuit boards, wire harnesses, etc) and Furniture. The stock has a 3.2% dividend yield and trades at 0.64 times the book value.</p>
<p><strong>8. SeaBright Holdings (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SBX">SBX</a>):</strong> SeaBright Holdings provides workers compensation insurance to maritime, state act and construction industry employers. The stock can be bought at 50% of the book value and yields a 2.4% dividend.</p>
<p>Key data for these stock picks are summarized below. Please note that this is just a preliminary screen, and further due diligence on these companies is advised before making any transaction decisions. </p>
<table id="portfolio">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>#</th>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>Company Name</th>
<th>Industry</th>
<th>Market Cap</th>
<th>P/E (ttm earnings)</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>Debt/Capital</th>
<th>Div. Yield</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TST">TST</a></td>
<td>The Street Inc</td>
<td>Internet Software and Services</td>
<td>$59.9M</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>0.00%</td>
<td>5.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>2</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AHC">AHC</a></td>
<td>A. H. Belo</td>
<td>Newspapers &#8211; Publishing</td>
<td>$125.4M</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>0.68</td>
<td>0%</td>
<td>4.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KCLI">KCLI</a></td>
<td>Kansas City Life Insurance</td>
<td>Life Insurance</td>
<td>$392M</td>
<td>14.4</td>
<td>0.54</td>
<td>0.00%</td>
<td>3.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>4</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=BNCN">BNCN</a></td>
<td>BNC Bancorp</td>
<td>Regional Banks</td>
<td>$69.3M</td>
<td>17.1</td>
<td>0.6</td>
<td>0.00%</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>5</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GAIA">GAIA</a></td>
<td>Gaiam Inc</td>
<td>Internet and Catalog Retail</td>
<td>$79.4M</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>0.55</td>
<td>2.37%</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>6</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=PLFE">PLFE</a></td>
<td>Presidential Life</td>
<td>Life Insurance</td>
<td>$346.9M</td>
<td>8.9</td>
<td>0.43</td>
<td>0.00%</td>
<td>2.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>7</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=KBALB">KBALB</a></td>
<td>Kimball</td>
<td>Printed Circuit Boards</td>
<td>$240.3M</td>
<td>35.3</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>0.08%</td>
<td>3.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>8</td>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SBX">SBX</a></td>
<td>SeaBright</td>
<td>Property and Casualty Insurance</td>
<td>$189.4M</td>
<td>&#8211;</td>
<td>0.54</td>
<td>3.31%</td>
<td>2.36%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=KLU-6_lybKw:9653dKRstCg:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/8-small-cap-stocks-undervalued-by-the-balance-sheet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portfolio Update: Value Stock Guide Portfolio Up 12.90% vs 4.41% for S&amp;P500 in January 2012</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/portfolio-update-value-stock-guide-portfolio-up-12-90-vs-4-41-for-sp500-in-january-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/portfolio-update-value-stock-guide-portfolio-up-12-90-vs-4-41-for-sp500-in-january-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January completes a remarkable month for the Value Stock Guide portfolio, and this is a great time to update my readers with certain highlights. To recap, as of Jan 31, 2012, the Value Stock Guide portfolio performance compared to S&#38;P 500 are as follows: As of Jan 31, 2012 VSG Portfolio S&#38;P500 Jan 2012 12.90% [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>January completes a remarkable month for the Value Stock Guide portfolio, and this is a great time to update my readers with certain highlights. To recap, as of Jan 31, 2012, the Value Stock Guide portfolio performance compared to S&amp;P 500 are as follows:</p>
<table id="portfolio">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th><em>As of Jan 31, 2012</em></th>
<th>VSG Portfolio</th>
<th>S&amp;P500</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jan 2012</td>
<td>12.90%</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>Last 3 months</td>
<td>16.06%</td>
<td>4.76%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Since Inception, Annualized (Jul 23, 2009)</td>
<td>29.27%</td>
<td>0.68%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>You can review the <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/member-dashboard/portfolio/">current portfolio in detail</a> as well. If you are a premium member, you can sign in to view the restricted data fields. The performance table is always viewable on the sidebar from any page on the site.</p>
<h3>Quick Highlights</h3>
<ul>
<li>The best performing stock in the portfolio is up 97% in 5 months since purchase</li>
<li>The next best performing stock in the portfolio is up 78% in 2.5 months since purchase</li>
<li>The worst performing stock is down 7.24% since purchase a little less than 4 months ago</li>
<li><a href="http://valuestockguide.com/all/sales/exited-xrtx-at-16-10-30-gain-in-7-months/">I sold XRTX in January</a> for a gain of 29.94%, which does not include dividends. The stock was initially purchased in Jun for a holding period of 7 months.</li>
<li>I purchased 2 new stocks in January. Both these stocks are down marginally or almost flat. Together, they make up about 15% of the total portfolio</li>
</ul>
<h3>Expectations for February</h3>
<p>While it is tough to forecast for the future, I do expect to harvest gains in at least 1 stock and reduce my exposure to another. This will generate additional capital to start positions in 2-3 new stocks that I am contemplating. I will be posting my recommendations for these stocks for the members shortly, so stay tuned.</p>
<p>The economic situation is improving at a rapid pace domestically in US and the solution to the Greece problem is within sight as well. This will mean that investors will return back to the stock market in large numbers due to increased confidence as well as increased investment capital as the job market continues to improve. Now is the time to invest and stay invested to maximize your gains in the coming months.</p>
<p>If you are not a member, you can quickly sign up to receive my <strong>Premium </strong><a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stock-picks/">stock picks</a> and other benefits of the membership, either as a monthly member or with an annual membership that will give you 4 months of membership for free.</p>
<p><em><strong>Update</strong>: A 7 day trial membership is now available</em><br />
This is a great time to become a member and find some of the <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stocks-to-buy/">best value stocks to buy now</a> in this market!</p>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=xdTO_bR8haU:6rKUJq2qWTM:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/portfolio-update-value-stock-guide-portfolio-up-12-90-vs-4-41-for-sp500-in-january-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vishay Intertechnology Inc (VSH) – A Good Value But Be Cautious</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/vishay-intertechnology-inc-vsh-a-good-value-but-be-cautious/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/vishay-intertechnology-inc-vsh-a-good-value-but-be-cautious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VSH]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vishay Intertechnology (VSH) designs, manufactures and sells passive electronic components and discrete semiconductors. The company has grown over the last 5 decades by pursuing a strategy of growth through acquisitions. The current valuation of the company shares may be attractive to a value investor looking to get an exposure in the semiconductor sector. The Value [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Vishay Intertechnology (VSH) designs, manufactures and sells passive electronic components and discrete semiconductors. The company has grown over the last 5 decades by pursuing a strategy of growth through acquisitions. The current valuation of the company shares may be attractive to a value investor looking to get an exposure in the semiconductor sector.</p>
<h3>The Value Thesis for Vishay</h3>
<p>The company shares trade at a Price to Book ratio of 1.21 (using the share price of $12.65 as of Feb 1, 2012 closing). This number may not seem too tempting at the first glance. A part of the reason is the $1.73 B in goodwill impairment the company took in 2008 which cut its equity down in half. This is a problem I see with companies that try to grow with acquisitions. When the times are good, they inflate their balance sheets with intangibles and goodwill, that buffers the earnings. When the industry cycles down, as was the case in 2008, the previous years of “great earnings” are neutralized with an asset write down (impairment of the goodwill asset is a charge on the income statement)</p>
<p>The positive side of this is that Vishay has already taken the impairment charge so its financials are relatively clean now. In the last 4 quarters, the company has grown its book value from $1.49 B to $1.65 B, or about 10% in a little over a year.</p>
<p>It makes sense to judge the valuation based on the earnings, rather than the book, and we will take note of the following:</p>
<p>As of Feb 1, 2012, the company had</p>
<ul>
<li>Stock Price: $12.65</li>
<li>Market Value: $1.99 B</li>
<li>Cash on hand: $1.035 B (mrq, Sep 2011 quarter)</li>
<li>Debt: $423 million</li>
</ul>
<p>After adjusting for the $59.5 million in one time tax benefit Vishay took in the Dec 2012 quarter (or $0.31/share), the company earned $1.7/share in the trailing 12 months giving it a trailing P/E of 7.44. However, most of the $1.035 B in cash on its books is non essential and can be distributed to the shareholders without any material impact on the company’s future operations (Vishay intends to use the cash for future acquisitions as part of its growth strategy). I adjusted the P/E calculation further by discounting the price by the distributable cash, which I estimate to be around $5.73/share. This leads us to a trailing P/E of 4.07. If the operations continue to generate 11% in net profit margin as they have averaged for the previous 5 quarters, than the stock can potentially find its true value to be around a (ex cash) P/E ratio of 9, which gives it a target price of $21/share. However, this is not a given as the historical profit margins are much closer to 5%-6% range, which reflects the competitive nature of the industry as well as the fact that the customers have greater buying power than the suppliers like Vishay due to their size and concentration.</p>
<h3>There are Other Risks</h3>
<p>Vishay’s Class B shares control almost half the voting power (1 Class B share has 10 votes compared to 1 Class A shares with 1 vote). Since substantially all Class B shares are in private hands and not traded on the market, the possibility of Vishay being an acquisition target is remote. It is also difficult for an activist investor to get on the board and initiate changes to unlock the value. This can keep the share price depressed below its intrinsic value for a long period of time.</p>
<p>Vishay is also more susceptible to currency fluctuations and political events as over 70% of its production and revenues are overseas, with a significant presence in mid-east (Israel). It can work for or against the share price and introduces a level of uncertainty.</p>
<h3>Bottom Line</h3>
<p>While the value is there, whether you chose to buy the stock at the current prices will depend on your assessment of these external risks. If you do chose to initiate a position, it may be wise to keep it a small portion of your portfolio and increase your position if the gap between value and price increases.</p>
<p></p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://valuestockguide.com/member-dashboard/forum/stocks-general/vishay-intertechnology-inc-vsh-a-good-value-but-be-cautious/"><img src="http://valuestockguide.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a></span><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=f4D5zic4Dbo:3LOXoWtAHp0:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/vishay-intertechnology-inc-vsh-a-good-value-but-be-cautious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street’s Achilles’ Heel – Efficient Market Hypothesis Doesn’t Always Work</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/wall-streets-achilles-heel-efficient-market-hypothesis-doesnt-always-work/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/wall-streets-achilles-heel-efficient-market-hypothesis-doesnt-always-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value investing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Investors are constantly reminded that the markets are efficient and there is no use trying to beat the market as it cannot be done on a consistent basis. In fact, we are told, that over 70% of the mutual funds fail to beat the market, presenting this as an evidence to somehow imply, in some [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Investors are constantly reminded that the markets are efficient and there is no use trying to beat the market as it cannot be done on a consistent basis. In fact, we are told, that over 70% of the mutual funds fail to beat the market, presenting this as an evidence to somehow imply, in some convoluted logic, that we are better off handing over our money to the same mutual funds and invest passively, rather than take control of our own portfolio. I find this argument even more vacuous, considering that the best investors and stock pickers, who also happen to manage significant sums of money, do not usually run mutual funds.</p>
<h3>But Is the Market Truly Efficient?</h3>
<p>The Efficient Market Hypothesis states that the securities prices reflect all publicly available information. Trading based on insider knowledge is illegal, and even if it were possible, not enough investors would be privy to such non public information to make any significant impact on the overall returns of any stock. If Efficient Market Hypothesis were true, wouldn’t it imply that no investor has any particular advantage over any other when it comes to investing in stocks? If security prices immediately adjust to reflect any new public information than perhaps the only predictor to stock performance is the amount of risk an investor is willing to take.</p>
<p>Indeed, most financial products available to the investors today tacitly assume the sanctity of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. Passive investing, diversification and overall market index as a benchmark for performance are all a result of a blind faith in the EMH. Or to put it another way, if what you know about the past of the company doesn’t matter (since the stock price already reflects it), and there is no way of reliably knowing the future of the company, you might as well invest in a basket of stocks to cancel out individual stock risk and let your portfolio ride on the market risk alone.</p>
<p>No wonder index funds and passive investing are such easy sells. The financial industry has all the incentive to continue to promote the EMH and use it as an excuse for their own incompetence.</p>
<h3>History Paints a Different Picture</h3>
<p>Many studies on historical performance of stocks classified by asset classes have shown that over a reasonably long periods of time small cap stocks tend to out perform large cap stocks and value stocks out perform growth stocks. Traditionally, this has been brushed aside by asserting that small cap stocks and value stocks are riskier than the market so it is not surprising that the returns are higher. However, a study by Ibbotson Associates (now part of Morningstar) goes even further and shows that <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/all/small-cap-stocks-undervalued-stocks/">small cap value stocks outperform</a> all other asset classes on <strong><em>risk-adjusted basis</em></strong>.</p>
<p>Professor Greenwald in his seminal book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0471463396/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=arohasinvesli-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=0471463396">Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond (Wiley Finance)</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=arohasinvesli-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=0471463396" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></em> shows that if investors had blindly bought a portfolio of the lowest Price to Book ratio stocks they would have done better than the market. Even a slight introduction of a value bias improves portfolio performance.</p>
<h3>So if the Markets are Efficient, How can this be?</h3>
<p>Markets are efficient in aggregate and they are also reasonably efficient for well understood companies with highly liquid stock. For a large company that has a good number of Wall Street analysts following it, it is understandable that almost everything that is known is reflected in the stock price. Liquidity in the stock ensures that complex computer generated trades continuously work to exploit any inefficiency that may occur from time to time and quickly erase it.</p>
<p>However, there are quite a few situations where the markets are not as efficient and one can find stocks that are truly undervalued if one is alert. Here are a few cases where this is true</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Small cap stocks that are not well followed </strong>– Large institutions such as mutual funds and pension funds tend to avoid these stocks. Typically these funds avoid buying meaningful stakes in any company as that comes with additional filing requirements and the responsibilities of being a large shareholder. A smaller stake may not make sense for a large fund as any performance advantage of these stocks will just be a blip on their overall portfolio. They are also not covered adequately by the Wall Street as some of these companies are too small to be a investment banking prospect. </li>
<li><strong>Industry, sector or stock specific bull or bear market</strong> – In short term, the market overdoes its exuberance or pessimism for certain sectors or even individual companies. Eventually, the market does settle at the correct valuation but the discrepancy may persist for a long time. For example, the real estate bubble lasted much longer than expected. Even after it was plainly clear to most market observers that a bubble exists, most institutions could not simply unwind their positions quickly as that would cause an immediate market collapse. A retail investor can move much more quickly than an institution in these situations and take advantage of the gap between price and value.       <br />Certain cyclical industries go through a boom to bust cycle regularly. Metals, commodities, shipping, etc are a few examples. If an investor can determine that the demand of the product is not eroding, but rather the sector is doing badly due to excess capacity and over supply issues, than it is just a matter of waiting out until the capacity/supply imbalances are corrected for the stocks to recover. If you do your research right, these can be potentially phenomenal <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stocks-to-buy/">stocks to buy</a> and wait for the cycle to repeat. </li>
<li><strong>Unwanted stocks, special situation stocks</strong> – A stock is sold off by funds when they no longer fit the charter of the fund. This is generally done regardless of the investment merit of the stock. When this happens, a small window of undervaluation is created, that can reward investors handsomely. The following are some of the few common situations where this happens:
<ul>
<li>A stock leaves a popular index causing all the funds that invest in this index to sell the stock </li>
<li>A large company spins off a small division and the funds holding the parent company are not interested in the smaller spun off company </li>
<li>Mergers and acquisitions involving part or all of the acquired company where the market is not clear about the fundamentals of the business being acquired </li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Aggressively marketed stocks</strong> – If there is one example of a situation where sellers are privy to more information about the company than the buyers are, it is the IPO market. This is one case where insider selling is legal and it is not a surprise that the buyers in the IPO markets generally lose. Perhaps if a sector is witnessing a lot of IPO activity, an investor might take it as a sign of an overheated market and sell any holdings in that sector (or avoid it like a plague). </li>
</ul>
<p>Market inefficiencies create undervaluation that an investor can buy into. In some other cases, it can also create overvaluation that an investor can sell into or avoid. It is beneficial for a self managed investor to be alert for these situations as the difference in performance between a value biased portfolio and a market neutral portfolio can be very significant over the life of the portfolio. Make sure you look for investments outside of the typical Wall Street research and research the company deeply to understand its business and prospects. If the stock has been left for dead, but the business is humming along, it can be a terrific investment. These are the hidden corners of the market where the <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stock-picks/">best stock picks</a> lie and if you do not look for them yourself, you will never find them</p>
<p>And this is why Warren Buffett and other investors believe that the small investors have great advantage over the Wall Street. We are largely unconcerned with such things as stock liquidity, float, market caps, etc which often stymie the large institutions. We can focus solely on the business fundamentals for our investment decisions.</p>
<p><em><strong>Note</strong>: A version of this article appeared at </em><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/theres-an-advantage-to-being-a-small-fish-on-wall-street-2012-1"><em>Business Insider</em></a><em> on Jan 7, 2012</em></p>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=_-0dPN_iXFc:cKaff2onDuo:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/wall-streets-achilles-heel-efficient-market-hypothesis-doesnt-always-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exited XRTX at $16.10, 30% Gain in 7 Months</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/sales/exited-xrtx-at-16-10-30-gain-in-7-months/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/sales/exited-xrtx-at-16-10-30-gain-in-7-months/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XRTX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I closed out my stake in Xyratex, (XRTX) today for a 29.94 % gain (excluding dividends). The stock was initially purchased on June 30, 2011. Average cost for this and subsequent purchases was $12.39/share. The position in this stock in the Value Stock Guide portfolio was closed as the stock hit the target price today. [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>I closed out my stake in Xyratex, (<a href="http://valuestockguide.com/tag/xrtx/">XRTX</a>) today for a 29.94 % gain (excluding dividends). The stock was initially purchased on June 30, 2011. Average cost for this and subsequent purchases was $12.39/share.</p>
<p>The position in this stock in the Value Stock Guide portfolio was closed as the stock hit the target price today. Currently I believe the stock to be fairly valued given all the information available. Interestingly, Brean Murray recently <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/price-target/12/01/2266957/update-brean-murray-carret-maintains-buy-raises-pt-to-18-?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+benzinga%2Fmarkets+(Channels+-+Markets)">reiterated</a> their Buy rating on Xyratex&#160; and raised their price target to $18. I mostly agree that the future of the company is looking better every day, however, I think the stock is fairly valued now and there are other better undervalued opportunities available elsewhere.</p>
<p><strong>View the <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/member-dashboard/portfolio/">Value Stock Guide portfolio</a> here</strong> (login may be required)</p>
<p><em>Check out the membership area for more stock picks.</em></p>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=RrjKjmpWVg0:EBB_6w9WrVI:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/sales/exited-xrtx-at-16-10-30-gain-in-7-months/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Zix Corporation Stock (ZIXI) Undervalued?</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/is-zix-corporation-stock-zixi-undervalued/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/is-zix-corporation-stock-zixi-undervalued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zixi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=3007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ZIXI stock has shown up on many of my screens before and every time it did not make it to the Value Stock Guide Watch List. At a first glance, the stock indeed looks undervalued on many levels but a deeper look reveals a different picture. I want to outline my reasons on why I [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>ZIXI stock has shown up on many of my screens before and every time it did not make it to the Value Stock Guide Watch List. At a first glance, the stock indeed looks undervalued on many levels but a deeper look reveals a different picture. I want to outline my reasons on why I do not consider this stock undervalued below.</p>
<h3>Zix Corporation Background</h3>
<p>Zix Corporation provides secure email and encryption services to law offices, government agencies, health care provides and insurance companies, financial services industry and SEC. This service is provided using Software as a Service (SaaS) model. The company is based out of Dallas, Texas.</p>
<p>There are many other competing service providers for secure email including the open source PGP encryption technology, Cisco Systems, McAfee and Trend Micro.&#160; The barriers to entry in this industry is relatively low, patents notwithstanding. Some of the competitors are large enough to materially erode Zix’s market share if they wish. Zix however looks appealing at the first blush due to its reported PE ratio of 4.49 and what appears to be a trailing 12 month EPS of 0.66. This EPS though translates to a total net income of $42.49 million. Zix’s ttm revenues only amounted to $37 million. So what explains this abnormality?</p>
<h3>Tax Benefits</h3>
<p>Zix has accumulated $75.35 million in accumulated US deferred tax assets. These are a result of its historical losses. These deferred tax assets are recognized if it is more likely than not that they can be used to offset future earnings. In Dec 2010, Zix chose to recognize a large portion of these assets. $35.5 million was applied right away as a benefit on the income statement, and another $34.3 million was moved to the balance sheet as deferred tax assets. As a result, this has added $0.53/share in EPS to its ttm earnings.</p>
<p>Without the use of these tax assets, Zix’s EPS for the trailing 12 month is $0.12/share which gives it an adjusted PE ratio of 23.82.</p>
<p>This of course, is a far cry from the reported <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/all/deconstructing-value-investing-income-statement-part-ii/">PE ratio</a> of 4.49 at popular financial sites.</p>
<h3>Balance Sheet Strength</h3>
<p>Currently Zix sports a Price to Book ratio of 4.46. It has $22 million in cash out of the total assets of $63.66 million. With a market value of $191 million, Zix shares are terribly over priced based on its <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/all/deconstructing-value-investing-a-short-guide-to-identifying-best-value-stocks-part-i-balance-sheet/">balance sheet</a> strength. One can argue, that for a software company that relies much more on its intellectual capital to generate revenues (rather than factories and equipment), it is to be expected that P/B ratio will be high. I will accept this argument but we should also consider the following.</p>
<p>Zix reported negative shareholders equity until Mar 2010 quarter. Subsequent to that the equity turned positive due to improving business conditions. However, the equity got a quantum boost in Dec 2010 quarter when $34.3 million in deferred and unapplied tax assets were moved to the balance sheet. Excluding this asset, the P/B ratio is 22.</p>
<table id="portfolio">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>(in millions)</th>
<th>Sep-30-2011</th>
<th>Dec-31-2010</th>
<th>Dec-31-2009</th>
<th>Dec-31-2008</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cash</td>
<td>22.03</td>
<td>24.62</td>
<td>13.31</td>
<td>13.24</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>Total Assets</td>
<td>63.66</td>
<td>66.85</td>
<td>19.75</td>
<td>19.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total Liability</td>
<td>20.73</td>
<td>19.96</td>
<td>21.74</td>
<td>20.66</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>Equity</td>
<td>42.92</td>
<td>46.89</td>
<td>-1.99</td>
<td>-1.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>But then, an asset is an asset and if business continues to improve this asset will retain value. This is just a cautionary insight to illustrate the fact that one must look beyond the numbers to understand what is really going on in the business.</p>
<h3>Earnings are Rising</h3>
<table id="portfolio">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>(in millions)</th>
<th>ttm</th>
<th>Dec-31-2010</th>
<th>Dec-31-2009</th>
<th>Dec-31-2008</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Revenues</td>
<td>37.11</td>
<td>33.07</td>
<td>26.41</td>
<td>22.6</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>Gross Margin</td>
<td>81%</td>
<td>80%</td>
<td>83%</td>
<td>82%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Operating Margin</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>16%</td>
<td>9%</td>
<td>7%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>Adjusted EPS</td>
<td>0.12 </td>
<td>0.08 </td>
<td>0.04 </td>
<td>0.03 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SGA</td>
<td>42%</td>
<td>49%</td>
<td>60%</td>
<td>63%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>R&amp;D</td>
<td>14%</td>
<td>15%</td>
<td>14%</td>
<td>12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rev Increase (over prior period)</td>
<td>12.22%</td>
<td>25.22%</td>
<td>16.9%</td>
<td>&#160;</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td>EPS increase (over prior period)</td>
<td>50%</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>33%</td>
<td>&#160;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>The table above is adjusted to net out the deferred tax income from the Dec, 2010 and ttm columns. As you can see, the company has been consistently improving its operating margin over the years as its SG&amp;A costs are spread over an increasing revenue base. The R&amp;D expense has been consistent as a percent of sales. Whether the company is able to increase its net income depends on whether it is able to keep its sales growing as well as how much SG&amp;A leverage it still has left. </p>
<p>As a value investor, I tend to be a bit skeptical of a company’s future growth. In this case, next 5 year growth is estimated to be at 20.83% which still gives the shares a PEG ratio of 23.82/20.83 = 1.14. This shows that the stock is fairly valued based on the expected growth rate. However, as the table above shows, the EPS is fairly sensitive to the revenue growth and even a slight decline in revenue will have a disproportionate effect on the EPS. This is largely due to the fact that in a highly competitive market like this, Zix has to continue investing in R&amp;D to keep its market share.</p>
<h3>Share Repurchase</h3>
<p>Improvement in the balance sheet and the outlook for future business has given the management confidence to announce a $15 million share repurchase program that expires in Jul 2012. For a $191 million market value company that is NOT undervalued by most measures, I believe that this share repurchase program is ill advised and will have very little to no effect on the stock price when completed.</p>
<h3>Bottom Line</h3>
<p>The stock is fairly valued to over valued and therefore I have no interest and cannot recommend a purchase of <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/tag/zixi/">ZIXI</a> stock. The future may be rosy, but the historical losses do not inspire much confidence in the management’s ability to keep executing. Neither does the level of competition in the industry.</p>
<p><strong>Avoid at current levels. Purchase when the stock falls to $1.5 or below.</strong></p>
<p></p>
<span class="sfforumlink"><a href="http://valuestockguide.com/member-dashboard/forum/stocks-general/is-zix-corporation-stock-zixi-undervalued/"><img src="http://valuestockguide.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-forum/styles/icons/default/bloglink.png" alt="" /> Join the forum discussion on this post</a></span><div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=zaGBcv-dojk:rfQhZjr_mQ4:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/is-zix-corporation-stock-zixi-undervalued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monthly Membership Option is Now Available</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/monthly-membership-option-is-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/monthly-membership-option-is-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 07:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=2987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick update about the Premium membership program. I am pleased to offer a monthly membership option in addition to the annual membership. Both of these choices are equivalent in terms of benefits and access, except for the cost. Annual membership works out to be about 33% cheaper than the monthly option over a [...]<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Just a quick update about the Premium membership program. I am pleased to offer a monthly membership option in addition to the annual membership. Both of these choices are equivalent in terms of benefits and access, except for the cost. Annual membership works out to be about 33% cheaper than the monthly option over a 12 month period. Or you can say, with annual membership, you get 4 months free! </p>
<p>Choice&#160; is always better than no choice, and it is a crying shame I did not offer this earlier.</p>
<p>To make this possible, I did have to re-work the guarantee (existing subscribers, guarantee you signed up under will be honored). So while annual subscribers still have 90 day satisfaction guarantee, monthly subscribers only get 30 days. No, I will not work less hard for monthly subscribers <img src='http://valuestockguide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  It just means that if you are a monthly subscriber and you renew for the next month there is a tacit implication that you want to continue. Remember, guarantee starts from the day you sign up for the first time.</p>
<p>If you have considered becoming  a member in the past (or even if it just occurred to you), a monthly membership is a good way to test things out.</p>
<p>(Hint: When you decide you like the Premium service and want to continue, just cancel your monthly subscription and sign up for the annual subscription and you save 33%)</p>
<p><a href="http://valuestockguide.com/stock-picks/">Sign Up for the membership here</a> and before clicking on the Subscribe button, choose which payment option you prefer – Monthly or Annual. Everything from there on should be auto-magic. If you do encounter any problems at all, <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/about/contact/">let me know</a> and I will take care of you.</p>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=39ubWSsqkzo:-1eYa2rjEVk:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/monthly-membership-option-is-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11 Worst Stocks for 2011 – Finding Value in the Scrap Heap</title>
		<link>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/11-worst-stocks-for-2011-finding-value-in-the-scrap-heap/</link>
		<comments>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/11-worst-stocks-for-2011-finding-value-in-the-scrap-heap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shailesh Kumar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dht]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thqi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valuestockguide.com/?p=2654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can be very profitable to screen for the "worst stocks" for value opportunities. Includes downloadable data.<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><div style="float:right; width: 30%; padding: 0px 0px 5px 5px; margin: 2px 2px 2px 2px; background-color:#E6EAFA; font-size:80%">
<img src="http://valuestockguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/page-excel-icon.png" alt="Excel" style="padding:8px 3px 0px 0px"/> <strong><big><a href="http://valuestockguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011BottomScrapers.xlsx" onClick="javascript: _gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/downloads/worst2011']);">Download Excel Data</a></big></strong>
</div>
<p>Often stocks fall to prices so low it becomes a compelling value based on assets or book value even when the operations and profitability are a mess. Understanding this, it can be very profitable to find the worst stocks in any time period – perhaps stocks hitting 52 week lows, and then looking to see if there is enough value in them to justify a purchase.</p>
<p>In this screen, I list 11 stocks for 2011 that have destroyed most value for its shareholders this year. The stock price declines are justifiable to a large degree, but one also needs to consider the tangible value in the business to determine if the declines are over done. </p>
<p>There is also an Excel data sheet attached to this list with additional valuation columns that will help you filter for your own valuation criteria. Please note that I have not included stocks that are trading on the pink sheets and have only included companies with market capitalization greater than $30 million.</p>
<table id="portfolio">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Symbol</th>
<th>Company Name</th>
<th>Market Capitalization</th>
<th>Price Performance (This Yr)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=MOTR">MOTR</a></td>
<td>MOTRICITY INC</td>
<td>$42.1M</td>
<td>-95.10%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMR">AMR</a> *</td>
<td>AMR CORP.</td>
<td>$182.4M</td>
<td>-93.02%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SMSI">SMSI</a></td>
<td>SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE INC</td>
<td>$39.3M</td>
<td>-93.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=THQI">THQI</a></td>
<td>THQ INC</td>
<td>$48.6M</td>
<td>-88.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=TRID">TRID</a></td>
<td>TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS INC</td>
<td>$38.4M</td>
<td>-88.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ALIM">ALIM</a></td>
<td>ALIMERA SCIENCES INC</td>
<td>$39.3M</td>
<td>-87.96%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=EK">EK</a></td>
<td>EASTMAN KODAK CO</td>
<td>$176.9M</td>
<td>-87.77%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SATC">SATC</a></td>
<td>SATCON TECHNOLOGY CORP</td>
<td>$69.5M</td>
<td>-87.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMSC">AMSC</a></td>
<td>AMERICAN SUPERCONDUCTOR CORP</td>
<td>$191.3M</td>
<td>-86.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="alt">
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=LEDS">LEDS</a></td>
<td>SEMILEDS CORP</td>
<td>$104.6M</td>
<td>-86.82%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=DHT">DHT</a></td>
<td>DHT HOLDINGS INC</td>
<td>$44.7M</td>
<td>-85.08%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p><em>*American Airlines (AMR) has received notice that it is being delisted from NYSE.</em></p>
<h3>How to Analyze These Stocks?</h3>
<p>Traditional profitability and earnings metrics are generally not very useful to analyze these stocks, except in situations where the business is profitable and the market has been totally irrational. Such situations might exist but are generally very rare. More likely you will find that the sales/profits have declined significantly and the market is assuming the worst. In situations like this, investors are in a hurry to sell their positions and the price declines may be over done.</p>
<p>It is important to focus on the following 3 things:</p>
<ol>
<li>Whether the book value, tangible book value and liquidation values all exceed the current market valuation? </li>
<li>Is the company likely to destroy more value in the future eroding some of the value in its assets? </li>
<li>Is there a possible catalyst – a turnaround plan, a potential suitor, a very valuable asset that can be sold, etc to unlock some value in the future </li>
</ol>
<p>The ideal answers to this question should be yes, no and yes. As can be expected, this analysis goes deeper than a normal stock valuation but the rewards can be astounding so it is worth while to do. In the attached Excel data sheet, I have included the Price/Book, Cash/Price and Debt/Asset values for these companies to quickly get you started on which stocks you may want to analyze further and determine if some of these are real value stock picks meriting a purchase.</p>
<p><strong><u>Download</u></strong>: <a href="http://valuestockguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011BottomScrapers.xlsx" onClick="javascript: _gaq.push(['_trackPageview', '/downloads/worst2011']);">Excel List</a></p>
<p><br/><strong><em>If You Find the Article Useful, Please Share Below</em></strong><br/></p>
<div class="social">
<div class="social_button tm"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/11-worst-stocks-for-2011-finding-value-in-the-scrap-heap/" data-text="11 Worst Stocks for 2012" data-count="horizontal" data-via="arohan" data-related="arohan">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<div class="social_button fb">
<div id="fb-root"></div>
<p><script src="http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#appId=135909286486915&amp;xfbml=1"></script><fb:like href="http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/11-worst-stocks-for-2011-finding-value-in-the-scrap-heap/" send="false" width="450" show_faces="false" action="recommend" font=""></fb:like></div>
<p><br/></p>
<div class="social_button tm"><script src="http://platform.linkedin.com/in.js" type="text/javascript"></script><script type="IN/Share" data-counter="right"></script></div>
<div class="social_button fb"><g:plusone size="medium" annotation="inline"></g:plusone></div>
</div>
<div class="clear"></div>
<p></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:F7zBnMyn0Lo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:qj6IDK7rITs"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?d=qj6IDK7rITs" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?a=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/ValueStockGuide?i=CkmohoESDxU:c3vSEzsEACU:gIN9vFwOqvQ" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://valuestockguide.com/all/screens/11-worst-stocks-for-2011-finding-value-in-the-scrap-heap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 21/82 queries in 0.041 seconds using apc
Object Caching 1607/1716 objects using apc

Served from: valuestockguide.com @ 2012-02-27 18:06:57 -->

