Wag The Gonzo

Dandeweed

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:03:00 +0000

Deep in the heart of a secluded forest, nestled among towering trees and hidden from prying eyes, lived two unlikely companions, Jake and Earl. They were both well into their twilight years, having led lives filled with colorful adventures and questionable choices. These old stoners had made a pact to venture deep into the woods, far away from society, to pursue their clandestine passion: growing marijuana.

For over a decade, Jake and Earl had cultivated their secret garden, tending to the plants with care and devotion. They had become masters of their craft, using their accumulated wisdom and experience to produce some of the finest buds nature had ever known. They embraced the peaceful solitude of their forest sanctuary, where the only sounds that reached their ears were the rustling leaves and the occasional chirping of birds.

Their humble existence was supported by the occasional visits from a mysterious buyer. Every few months, the buyer, whose identity remained unknown, would trek through the dense woods to collect the carefully harvested marijuana. The exchanges were swift and wordless, conducted with an air of secrecy that added an extra thrill to Jake and Earl's lives.

However, as harvest time approached one fateful year, a sense of unease began to settle over the aging stoners. Days turned into weeks, and still, their buyer failed to make an appearance. Jake and Earl grew increasingly restless, their worry mixing with the intoxicating scent of their maturing crops.

After waiting patiently for weeks, the old stoners reluctantly accepted the reality that their mysterious buyer would not be coming. With a heavy sigh, Jake looked at Earl, his eyes reflecting both disappointment and determination. It was clear that they had no other choice but to take matters into their own hands.

They carefully uprooted their beloved marijuana plants, wrapping them in damp burlap sacks to preserve their potency. Jake and Earl loaded their meager belongings onto their creaking cart and began the long journey back to civilization. The once-vibrant forest reluctantly released its guardians, bidding them farewell with a whispering breeze.

Navigating their way through thick undergrowth, across treacherous terrain, and up steep hills, the old stoners persevered. Their aging bodies strained under the weight of the burden they carried, but their spirits remained unyielding. Determination and the allure of a reward fueled their tired limbs.

Finally, after what felt like an eternity, Jake and Earl emerged from the woods, their weathered faces greeted by the sight of a bustling town. People moved about in a flurry of activity, their lives consumed by concerns far removed from the tranquility of the forest.

With their bounty concealed in the cart, the old stoners cautiously made their way through the streets, guided by instinct and the faint memory of the world they had left behind. It was a different place now, but they were determined to adapt, to find a way to make their presence known without drawing unwanted attention.

Through whispers and careful inquiries, Jake and Earl managed to find a community of like-minded individuals who shared their passion for marijuana. These new acquaintances, part of a growing movement for legalization, embraced the knowledge and experience the old stoners brought with them.

Together, they crafted a plan to establish a legal and reputable cannabis business, leveraging the expertise and the sought-after strains Jake and Earl had cultivated over the years. The duo became icons in the cannabis industry, their legacy spanning from the hidden forests to the mainstream market.

And so, Jake and Earl's story evolved from one of hidden secrets and isolation to a tale of redemption and success. They had come out of the shadows, adapting to a changing world and leaving their mark on an industry they had loved for so long. Their journey through the woods had been a transformative one, leading them to a new chapter in their lives, where their buds would bring joy and relaxation to countless individuals.

In the end, Jake and Earl discovered that sometimes, life's unexpected twists can lead us to opportunities we never imagined. As the sun set over the horizon, casting a warm glow on their new venture, the old stoners took a moment to reflect on their journey, grateful for the chance to share their passion with the world.

Excited by the possibilities that their newfound wealth and technology had brought them, Jake and Earl sat together, their smartphones in hand, exploring the vastness of the digital world. As they scrolled through various websites and stumbled upon an article, Jake's eyes widened with intrigue. It was an announcement about a prestigious global competition that sought to determine the best marijuana strain in the world.

Jake nudged Earl and pointed at the screen. "Hey, Earl, look at this! There's a contest for the best marijuana, and the winner gets worldwide recognition."

Earl leaned closer, his curiosity piqued. "Well, we do have the best buds in town, don't we? Why not give it a shot?"

With a newfound sense of purpose, Jake and Earl embarked on a journey to refine and showcase their exceptional strain of marijuana. They devoted countless hours to further perfecting their cultivation techniques, experimenting with innovative growing methods and meticulously monitoring their plants' growth. They spared no effort, treating their plants with the same love and care that had guided them throughout their years in the forest.

Finally, the day of the competition arrived, and Jake and Earl stood before a panel of expert judges, their nerves tingling with a mix of excitement and anticipation. The judges carefully inspected the buds, evaluating their aroma, appearance, and overall quality. The room was filled with the unmistakable fragrance of their strain, enticing and captivating all who were present.

As the judges deliberated, the tension in the air grew palpable. And then, the moment arrived—a triumphant announcement that Jake and Earl's strain had won first place, earning them the coveted title of having the best marijuana in the world.

News of their victory spread like wildfire throughout the cannabis community, igniting a frenzy of interest in their strain. Cannabis enthusiasts, connoisseurs, and entrepreneurs from all corners of the globe clamored to get their hands on the legendary buds grown by the enigmatic duo known as Jake and Earl.

Their strain became an instant sensation, celebrated for its unique characteristics, potent effects, and unparalleled quality. Dispensaries across the world eagerly stocked their shelves with Jake and Earl's signature strain, which soon became a household name among cannabis enthusiasts.

As their strain gained popularity, Jake and Earl found themselves at the forefront of the cannabis industry. They were invited to speak at conferences, consult with experts, and collaborate with other growers. Their expertise and experience became invaluable as they shared their knowledge with fellow cultivators, further elevating the quality of cannabis worldwide.

With their strain's success, Jake and Earl's influence expanded beyond the confines of the competition. They became advocates for responsible cannabis use, supporting legalization efforts, and working to break down stereotypes associated with marijuana culture. Through their journey, they became ambassadors for the power of passion, dedication, and the healing potential of their beloved plant.

In the end, Jake and Earl's strain of marijuana became more than just a winner in a competition; it became a symbol of their lifelong devotion to the craft, a testament to the incredible journey they had undertaken from hidden growers in the woods to respected pioneers of the industry. And as their strain flourished and their reputation grew, they continued to embrace their success with humility, always remembering the humble roots from which they had come.

As news of the scientific discovery spread, the revelation that Jake and Earl's renowned marijuana strain was a transgenic mutation between marijuana and dandelions sent shockwaves throughout the world. People's imaginations ran wild with images of "Frankenweed," and the reactions varied from intrigue to apprehension.

The scientific community was abuzz with debates and discussions about the implications of this unexpected discovery. Researchers and experts delved into the intricacies of the genetic makeup, analyzing the hybridization process and its potential effects. The revelation sparked a newfound interest in the field of genetic engineering, raising questions about the boundaries of scientific experimentation and the potential consequences of altering nature.

As the debates raged on, one undeniable fact emerged—the strain created by Jake and Earl possessed extraordinary qualities. Not only was it deliciously enticing, but its unique genetic composition also seemed to enhance its addictive properties. Users found themselves drawn to the strain, unable to resist its potent allure.

Despite concerns over the transgenic nature of the strain, its addictive nature, and the ethical questions raised, the demand for Jake and Earl's marijuana skyrocketed. Consumers, captivated by its extraordinary taste and undeniable allure, couldn't resist indulging in the controversial strain.

Governments and regulatory bodies struggled to address the situation, torn between the desire to regulate a potentially addictive substance and the overwhelming demand from the public. Laws and regulations were hastily drafted, attempting to strike a delicate balance between controlling the distribution of the strain and acknowledging the consumers' rights to make their own choices.

The strain, now famously known as "Dandeweed," gained a massive following worldwide. People lined up outside dispensaries, eagerly awaiting the chance to experience its unique effects. The addictive properties of Dandeweed sparked debates about responsible consumption and addiction treatment, leading to an increased focus on educating users about its potential risks.

As time went on, scientific research continued to explore the complexities of Dandeweed's genetic makeup and its addictive properties. Researchers aimed to understand the underlying mechanisms that made it so irresistible, hoping to find ways to mitigate its addictive nature or develop alternative treatments.

While the world grappled with the implications of Dandeweed, Jake and Earl found themselves thrust into the center of attention once again. This time, however, their journey took an unexpected turn. They became advocates for responsible consumption, emphasizing the importance of education and informed decision-making. They used their newfound influence to support addiction treatment programs and raise awareness about the potential risks associated with Dandeweed.

Through their advocacy efforts, Jake and Earl sought to shift the focus from controversy to responsible use, encouraging open discussions about addiction, substance abuse, and the complex relationship between humans and altered plant species.

The tale of Jake and Earl's journey, from humble growers to global icons, took an unforeseen twist. Their strain, born from an accidental transgenic mutation, became a symbol of both delight and concern, sparking a global conversation about the consequences of tampering with nature and the power of addiction. And in the midst of it all, the old stoners-turned-pioneers continued to advocate for responsible consumption, reminding the world that even the most delicious temptations require moderation and self-awareness.

As the demand for Dandeweed soared, it didn't take long for entrepreneurial individuals and enthusiasts to attempt to cultivate the strain on their own. Drawn by its addictive allure and potential for profit, people began growing Dandeweed in their homes, backyards, and even in secret outdoor locations.

Unbeknownst to many, the dandelion genes within the strain allowed it to thrive and spread like a true weed. Its adaptability and resilience proved to be formidable traits, enabling it to flourish in various climates and terrains. As word spread about the ease of cultivation and the strain's remarkable growth capabilities, Dandeweed began popping up in unexpected places.

Fields that were once adorned with native flora now found themselves blanketed in a sea of vibrant green as Dandeweed overtook the landscape. It spread across vacant lots, abandoned spaces, and even found its way into cracks in urban pavements. The sight of the dandelion-like leaves and the unmistakable scent of the strain became a common occurrence, much to the surprise and chagrin of many.

Governments and environmental organizations soon faced an unprecedented challenge. The rapid proliferation of Dandeweed raised concerns about its impact on native plant species, ecosystems, and agricultural lands. Efforts were made to contain its spread and prevent it from becoming an invasive species that could disrupt local flora and fauna.

Researchers and environmentalists worked diligently to assess the potential ecological consequences of the rampant growth of Dandeweed. They conducted studies to understand its interactions with native plants, wildlife, and pollinators, striving to find a balance between managing the spread of the strain and preserving the delicate equilibrium of ecosystems.

While some viewed Dandeweed as an ecological threat, others saw an opportunity for innovation and sustainability. The hardiness and resilience of the strain made it an attractive option for alternative farming practices and biomass production. Researchers explored the potential for utilizing Dandeweed in biofuel production, bioremediation, and other eco-friendly applications, seeking to transform what was initially perceived as a problem into a solution.

As Dandeweed continued to proliferate, its status as a cultural phenomenon remained intact. The strain became deeply intertwined with the social fabric, inspiring art, music, and even culinary creations. Its presence in everyday life became a symbol of the complex relationship between humanity and the natural world, prompting introspection and conversations about our responsibility as stewards of the environment.

Throughout it all, Jake and Earl found themselves at the center of this unfolding saga once again. Recognizing the potential consequences of uncontrolled growth, they became advocates for responsible cultivation and environmental stewardship. They joined forces with scientists, environmental organizations, and policymakers to develop guidelines and educational programs that emphasized the importance of sustainable practices and mitigating the strain's impact on native ecosystems.

In the end, the proliferation of Dandeweed served as a sobering reminder of the delicate balance between human ambition, the pursuit of pleasure, and the consequences of tampering with nature. It forced society to confront the challenges posed by our actions and to find innovative ways to address the unintended consequences of our endeavors.

As the world learned from the lessons of Dandeweed's widespread growth, efforts were made to strike a harmonious coexistence with the strain, embracing its potential benefits while mitigating its ecological impact. And in this ever-evolving dance between humans and nature, Jake and Earl's journey continued, guiding the way toward a more sustainable and responsible future.

As Dandeweed's proliferation continued and its impact on the marijuana industry became increasingly apparent, big marijuana companies indeed found themselves facing a significant challenge. The rapid spread of the strain threatened their market dominance and posed a threat to their profits. Frustrated by the unforeseen consequences, these companies sought to marginalize Jake and Earl, viewing them as catalysts for the disruption of the industry.

Attempts were made to discredit the duo and tarnish their reputation. The companies launched smear campaigns, attempting to paint Jake and Earl as irresponsible cultivators and promoters of an uncontrollable weed. They sought to create fear and skepticism around Dandeweed, emphasizing its potential risks and ecological impact in order to dissuade consumers and regulators alike.

However, despite the efforts to ostracize them, Jake and Earl found support from a diverse range of individuals and organizations who recognized the complexities of the situation. They formed alliances with environmental activists, cannabis advocates, and independent growers who saw the potential of Dandeweed as a symbol of resilience and a catalyst for change.

The federal government, still grappling with the legal status of marijuana, faced an unexpected dilemma. The widespread proliferation of Dandeweed made enforcement of anti-marijuana laws increasingly difficult. The strain had become so ubiquitous that attempting to eradicate it would require an overwhelming amount of resources, both financial and human.

The government was forced to reconsider its stance on marijuana and evaluate the potential benefits of regulation and legalization. The conversation around cannabis shifted from a criminal issue to one centered on harm reduction, public health, and taxation. The persistence of Dandeweed effectively altered the discourse and accelerated the push for nationwide legalization.

Recognizing the futility of attempting to control Dandeweed's spread, the government shifted its priorities toward establishing regulatory frameworks that would ensure consumer safety, quality control, and responsible cultivation practices. The cultivation of Dandeweed itself was brought within the bounds of these regulations, allowing independent growers, including Jake and Earl, to contribute to the legal market while adhering to the established guidelines.

The industry landscape transformed as a result of Dandeweed's pervasive growth. The once-dominant big marijuana companies were forced to adapt or face irrelevance. Many shifted their focus toward quality control, branding, and value-added products, recognizing that the market demanded more than just a standardized marijuana strain.

With the legalization and regulation of marijuana, new opportunities arose for a more diverse and inclusive market. Small-scale growers, including Jake and Earl, flourished as consumers embraced the variety and uniqueness offered by independent cultivators. The cannabis industry became a blend of established corporations and passionate growers, fostering a more dynamic and competitive marketplace.

In this evolving landscape, Jake and Earl's journey took on a new significance. They became advocates for fair and inclusive practices within the industry, championing the rights of independent cultivators and pushing for ethical and sustainable cultivation methods. Their experiences with Dandeweed's unintended consequences fueled their commitment to responsible stewardship and shaped the way they navigated the evolving marijuana landscape.

As society adapted to the transformative effects of Dandeweed's spread and the resulting paradigm shift in marijuana regulations, the ongoing dialogue surrounding responsible cannabis use, environmental impact, and fair market practices continued. And within this ever-changing tapestry, Jake and Earl found themselves as catalysts for change, guiding the industry toward a more balanced and sustainable future.

"Prop Weed 2.0" Fan fictional story based on the adventures of Cheech and Chong

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Sun, 09 Oct 2022 22:32:00 +0000

Prop Weed 2.0

One day, just after doing another funny show in San Francisco, Cheech and Chong were sent an apparent gift from a fan.

The packaging had markings indicating that it had come from Oaxaca, Mexico.

The screeners opened the package for them, and showed them the contents inside.

Inside the package were 3 items. A joint, a note, and a skeleton key with a plastic motel room key.

Chong picks up the note and reads it to Cheech. "This is the best joint in the world." "If you want more, you know where to find me." Signed "Professor Elizardo Stendanko Jr."

Cheech picks up the joint. He scrutinizes it a little bit. He was highly skeptical that this would be the best joint in the world, but was in a good enough mood to roll with it, and lighting it up. The fact that it was free weed made it even better.

It was a delicious, lemony flavored sativa. Cheech took a couple more hits, and offered it to Chong. Chong was already smoking some Maui Wowie, and declined.

Cheech found himself taking bigger and bigger hits, and before he knew it it was just gone.

"Damn Tommy, that was some goood sh.....it...." Cheech says, and as he is saying it he starts slurring his words, and sits down in a catatonic haze with a shit eating grin on his face.

Chong looks up and see's Cheech all fucked up.

"Yo, Cheech, you alright?

Cheech is still sitting there grinning.

"Ill check back on you in a little bit." "I promised Willie Nelson I'd hang with him at a drag show close by."

Chong gets back a couple hours later and finds Cheech still sitting in the chair. Cheech's eyes were completely dilated, and he was still grinning. Occasionally he would just start laughing to himself. A joke that only he knew, and apparently it was very funny.

A straight dude in a suit walks up to Chong.

"I am sorry Mr. Chong, but you guys can't be backstage anymore." The theater has been closed for a couple of hours now, and the security staff are ready to go home."

Tommy says to the manager. "Cheech is apparently to fucked up to walk right now, could we borrow one of those electric scooters?"

The manager would of agreed to anything at this point and got Cheech a scooter from the admission lobby.

Tommy gets Cheech into the electric scooter, and sits on Cheech's lap driving it to the hotel close by.

They get into Cheech's hotel room. Chong realizes it's his turn at baby sitting detail for Cheech, and makes himself comfortable in the room.

Chong grabs a rolling tray, and twists one up. He lights it, sitting back on the couch looking at Cheech.

Another couple hours go by, and Cheech is still tripping.

By this time Tommy, is both amazed, and pretty high himself.

Tommy had time to think of evil pranks.

Tommy grabs a pair of VR Googles, he puts them on and the first thing he sees is the last porno Cheech was watching where it left off.

Tommy watches that for a few minutes approvingly, but changes it to a 10 hour video of Electric Sheep, and a loop of the song "Four Cornered Room" by War.

He puts the VR googles on Cheech, and takes him for a ride around the streets of San Francisco in the electric scooter.

Tommy and Cheech end up on the top of Hippy Hill. The sun is rising, and Cheech finally starts to regain "normal" consciousness only to awaken into a psychedelic VR reality with the sound of the band War singing "Zoom zoom zoom!" in his ears.

Cheech starts freaking out, "Where am I? Where am I!"

Tommy hearing Cheech awaken, chuckles, and decides to leave the VR goggles on a few more minutes before taking them off.

Cheech, seeing Chong felt a sense of relief overcomes him.

"Dude!. That was incredible!" "That really was the best joint I ever smoked in my life!"

Chong laughs "Haha, I bet, man."

Cheech gets up, and they walk back to the hotel room.

When they get to the room, Cheech sees the package on the table. He reads the note again, and picks up the skeleton key.

"If you want more, you know where to find me"

On the skeleton key was a plastic motel room key that said "Hotel California, Oaxaca, Mexico, Room 13.

Cheech stares at the key, and starts romancing in his mind the taste of the sweet lemony sativa.

"We got to go there! I never tasted such delicious weed!" "Let's go down there, and see if they will sell us some seeds, so we can grow this at home!"

They were under obligation to do one more show that week, and decided to fly down to Oaxaca, Mexico, as soon as it was done.

After the flight, and eventual arrival to the Hotel California they approached the check in clerk, and told them that they had reservations for room 13.

The clerk hands them an electronic key card for their room.

"What, no spooky skeleton key?"

The clerk looks at him slightly confused.

They approach the door to room 13. The electronic key card receiver was attached to the door knob. They swiped the key, and entered the room.

The room looked like a traditional Mexican hotel room. Albeit having a certain pop culture reference to it, and being popular to it's many guests it wasn't really anything special. Except for the mural. A red satanic looking Chupacabra surrounded by magic mushrooms, and marijuana plants.

Suspecting the key might lead to some sort of secret passage since it was not used to open the door, they searched the room for a place for the skeleton key to fit.

Fortunately Cheech's love of Mexican folk art helped him find the key hole in a relatively short amount of time.

In the mural, inside the middle of the satanic Chupacabra's butt hole, he saw they key hole.

Cheech places the key inside, and a secret door reveals itself from the mural.

When the door opens a warm air rises out from it, and the smell of fresh marijuana wafted with it.

Cheech looks at Tommy, and says "I think we're in the right place!"

Tommy inhales the odor from inside. "Hell yeah, let's do this man!"

They walk down the stairs illuminated with multicolored led lights into a giant grow room.

Professor Elizardo Stedanko Jr is standing in front of a bunch of marijuana plants growing alongside magic mushrooms.

He sees Cheech and Chong walking up to him.

"Welcome to our humble abode!" Waving his arms in a sweeping welcoming gesture.

A petite older Mexican Senora waved to them and motioned for them to make themselves comfortable.

A giant old wrinkled lizard about the size of a medium alligator sat in a chair. It was wearing a Mexican sombrero, and it's tongue was flicking in and out over a plate of beans.

"I am sure you probably remember my father." He was a detective, who got hooked on some weird strain you guys were growing, and turned into a lizard."

Cheech and Chong look at each other. They both have blank expressions, shaking their heads. Chong says "Sorry man, I don't even remember what I had for lunch."

The lizard looks at them with it's black mirrored dilated eyes, and shakes his head in disbelief.

Professor Elizardo introduces his mother. "This is my mama, you can call her Mama too!"

"We have been living down here for 35 years in exile from our village in Catemaco. "Our family tried to be supportive of mothers beastiality fetish. Letting her support the family performing donkey shows to perverted tourists. That's where she met my Papa. Unfortunately, falling in love with a giant lizard crossed a line to far for her family. They chased my parents out off town. It was only for the generosity of her Tio Chapo, that we ended up here, when he gave them the same skeleton key, I sent to you."

Elizardo Jr points to a bassinet against the wall. Inside it is a nest made of hay. "I was the only egg that ever hatched." "It's a nice place really, if you can get past the noises of people screwing in room 13 all the time."

Cheech says "Wow , that's some crazy family story, but we came down here to see if you would sell us some seeds to that strain that you sent us."

Professor Elizardo shakes his head no. "I'm sorry these are not for sale, the world is not ready yet for this strain"

Cheech thinks back to when he smoked the joint. "Yeah, that was one hell of a trip." I never had a joint hit me like that, and Chong can vouch for me I have smoked a lot of joints in my time"

Professor Elizardo Jr smiles proudly. "It is a strain I have been working on for years." "It is a transgenic mutation between Santa Marta Gold, and Mexican magic mushrooms!" "I managed to genetically combine the mushroom mycelium with marijuana!" "Originally my plan was to make a transgenic mutation between marijuana, and dandelions." "Hoping they would of sprung up like weeds across every lawn overgrowing the United States!" "Instead, I created the ultimate trip by combing two of the most popular recreational drugs known to mankind." "I call it Prop Weed 2.0!"

"I knew this strain would be successful when I tested it on Joaquin Phoenix while he was filming The Joker. The strain elevated his method acting to another level, and he won an Academy Award for Best Actor!"

Cheech was in awe of what Professor Elizardo had created. "Professor, is there any way we can make a deal for some of those seeds? We came a long way to get them."

Professor Elizardo Stedanko Jr pauses to consider his options. "All right here is the deal. I will give you both enough seeds to grow your own, but you have to do something you might find a bit inconvenient." He laughs a little evilly afterwards.

"These are my terms if you want them." "You each have to carry the seeds in your butt, and you have to walk back to the United States with a migrant caravan."

Cheech was unhesitant "Deal!"

Chong had his reservations. "The only thing I have stuck up my ass lately is lubricated CBD suppositories." "I kind of had an issue down there if you follow my drift."

Cheech realizes what Chong was referring to, and offered to stick Chong's share of seeds up his bum as well.

Professor Elizardo says "Then we have a deal!" He hands Cheech a couple of lubricated rubbers packed with seeds.

Cheech goes into a bathroom for privacy. You could hear him grunting, and complaining as he puts the rubber filled seeds up his butt.

Cheech walks out of the bathroom walking like he had ridden a trotting horse bare back for a couple of hours.

Chong looks at Cheech as he walks out. "Man, you must really want those seeds bad if you're willing to go all Broke Back Mountain for them."

Cheech shakes his head in agreement still walking in an awkward swagger.

Professor Elizardo Jr escorts them back to the hotel room, taking the skeleton key out from the satanic Chupacabra's butt hole, and shutting the door behind him leaving the room with just Cheech and Chong inside it.

Cheech and Chong kept their word. Their adventure continued as they joined up with a migrant caravan heading north. Along the way Cheech was not able to take a crap for over ten days. He ended up bloating like a tick, and Chong used him as a raft to cross the Rio Grande. There were coyotes, and drug lords along the way. They bonded with other mules carrying popular recreational drugs up their butts. They even got detained by La Migra and almost got deported back to Mexico because Cheech had a hard time trying to run away from them because he had stomach cramps. Eventually, they made it home, Prop Weed 2.0 became a world wide sensation, and they both were blazed forever after.

Cannabis vs Trump 2016 Election Results

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:47:00 +0000

Cannabis vs Trump 2016 Election Results

This is a make shift spreadsheet that shows the states that had cannabis on the ballots this year, and a comparison total of how many people voted for cannabis and Donald Trump.

Cannabis came out ahead in votes over Donald Trump in all but 3 states: Arizona, Arkansas, and North Dakota.

Arizona was the only state that voted against cannabis reform, and Donald Trump had the majority.

Arkansas Issue No. 6: Medical marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	53.0%	(582,076) Donald Trump (677,904)
No	46.9%	(514,363)

Arkansas has 6 electoral votes for Donald Trump

Arizona Proposition 205: Recreational marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
No	51.9%	(1,061,378) Donald Trump (1,021,154)
Yes	48.0%	(981,509)

Arizona has 11 electoral votes for Donald Trump

California Proposition 64: Recreational marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	56.0%	(5,059,136) Donald Trump (3,916,209)
No	43.9%	(3,964,378)

California has 55 electoral votes for Cannabis

Florida Amendment No. 2: Medical marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	71.2%	(6,498,859) Donald Trump (4,605,515)
No	28.7%	(2,616,916)

Florida has 29 electoral votes for Cannabis

Massachusetts Question 4: Recreational marijuana

Yes

53.5%

(1,745,945) Donald Trump (1,083,069)

46.4%

(1,513,304)

Massachusetts has 11 electoral votes for Cannabis

Maine Question 1: Recreational marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	50.1%	(378,288) Donald Trump (334,838)
No	49.8%	(375,668)

Maine has 4 electoral votes for Cannabis

Montana Initiative No. 182: Medical marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	57.6%	(284,530) Donald Trump (274,120)
No	42.3%	(209,137)

Montana has 3 electoral votes for Cannabis

North Dakota Initiated Statutory Measure No. 5: Medical marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	63.7%	(215,420) Donald Trump (216,133)
No	36.2%	(122,233)

North Dakota has 3 electoral votes for Donald Trump

Nevada State Question No. 2: Recreational marijuana

Candidate or Ballot-Vote	Vote percentage	Vote count
Yes	54.4%	(602,400) Donald Trump (511,319)
No	45.5%	(503,615)

Nevada has 6 electoral votes for Cannabis

According to the electoral map, Donald Trump receives 20 electoral votes, and cannabis received 108 electoral votes!

Cannabis wins!

Sources for this article provided by:

http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president

http://www.thecannabist.co/2016/11/08/election-2016-marijuana-results-states-recreational-medical/66994/

Examples of why you question the evidence used against you in a drug charge

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:55:00 +0000

First off I am happy to see that the word is getting out about questioning the evidence used against you for drug charges! Over the last few years I have been using my blog, website, and social media to reach millions of people, and putting out the word that the police have been using junk science to convict people for drugs.

Recently, a crime lab in New Jersey has been busted for providing fraudulent testimony regarding proper testing and proof that a substance is/was cannabis.

http://www.muni-mail.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Fallonmemo.pdf This is a PDF of allegations of wrong doing by State Lab Technician Kamalkant Shah.

"Mr. Shah was employed with the lab from 2005 to 2015; obviously all his “results” have been called into question. In Passaic County alone, the universe of cases possibly implicated in this conduct is 2,100."

Since this initial report it has ballooned to over 7,800.

Over 7,800 Prosecutions Questioned After NJ Lab Tech Caught Faking Drug Test Results

Judy Fallon, D.P.D., the author of the PDF, also notably stated:

"Jon Iannaccone and I attended a meeting this afternoon with the management of the Passaic County Prosecutor’s Office, the criminal bench, and representatives of the private bar where it was disclosed that Laboratory Technician II Kamalkant Shah of the New Jersey State Police Laboratory (in Little Falls) has been found to have “dry labbed” suspected CDS specimens. Basically, he was observed writing “test results” for suspected marijuana that was never tested."

The other gem the link provided was the possible ramifications of having to retest thousands of cases.

"The larger, and unanswered, question is how this impacts already resolved cases, especially those where the specimens may have been destroyed."

The memo also mentioned implications that the testing was not just for cases in that particular region. The lab received shipments for places out of their jurisdiction for testing as well.

"The Prosecutor’s Office has not formulated a policy or protocol yet to deal with these cases; they are still in the process of identifying them. I was told that the Little Falls laboratory is used by many other law enforcement agencies besides those in Passaic County."

Now, here is further proof that it is not just "one bad apple" Crime labs all over the country have been getting busted for providing false evidence to get prosecutions.

Michigan:

https://tribwxmi.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/nichols-nij-complaint.pdf This PDF is a formal complaint against Michigan crime labs falsifying evidence to get convictions. The formal complaint was written by Attorney Michael Nichols.

MICHIGAN PROSECUTORS PRESSURED LAB ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA RESULTS

Oregon:

"A forensic analyst at a state police crime lab in Bend, Oregon, is under investigation for allegedly “skimming drugs” from controlled substance tests that were tied to nearly 1,000 drug-related cases going back to 2007."

Crime Lab Tech Tampers With Evidence in Oregon—but It’s a Nationwide Problem

Montana:

Former Montana State Crime Lab employee accused of stealing pills, could impact Billings defendants

"BILLINGS - A former Montana Crime Lab employee is suspected of stealing drugs in as many as 50 cases, the Attorney General’s Office confirmed Friday.Steve Brester, a former Missoula Police Lieutenant, is under investigation by the state Department of Justice’s Criminal Investigation Division.Brester was employed with the crime lab as an evidence technician in September of 2014 and was terminated in June of 2015.Over the period of nine months that Brester worked for the crime lab, he’s accused of stealing pills that were submitted for evidence in a number of cases across the state."

Massachusetts:

The Cost of Lying: For One Lab Scientist Who Fabricated Evidence, Just Two Years in Prison

"Annie Dookhan was recently paroled after serving just two years of a 3-5 year sentence.Her crime?Routinely and brazenly fabricating evidence that potentially tainted 40,000 convictions in Massachusetts.Dookhan was a chemist who worked in a Massachusetts crime lab. Bright and ambitious, Dookhan was the equivalent of a drug testing rockstar. In 2004, her first full year in the crime lab, Dookhan conducted 9,239 drug tests, or triple the number of tests conducted by the other chemists in the lab. In 2005, her second year in the lab, Dookhan performed more than double the number of tests conducted by the lab’s next-most productive chemist, and outpaced the other chemists by nearly four times their mean testing results.The staggering numbers should have raised multiple red flags. But they didn’t. Not for almost a decade.In the years between 2003-2012, Dookhan was involved in tens of thousands of cases. In some cases, she did not perform drug tests but fabricated results. In others, she tampered with drug samples so they would test positive for illegal drugs when there were no illegal substances at all. And sometimes she would change the weight of tested drugs so that they would trigger more serious penalties.After several miscarriages of justice were revealed, Dookhan was arrested and, in 2013, pled guilty to a variety of charges, including tampering with evidence and filing false reports."
So, you see, it is not isolated to just one area. It is a problem all over the country. State crime labs are becoming overwhelmed with having to back log cases to properly test them before a prosecution.

North Carolina:

ATTACKING THE STATE’S SCIENCE

Backlog At The NC State Crime Lab

The North Carolina Crime Lab Scandal

----------------------------------------------

Why does this matter?

Because the police use junk science to arrest you, and they do not have the capacity to properly test every drug case out there, so they still have to cheat to get the conviction. That is unless you question the evidence, and have it properly tested before you make a plea deal.

The more that people do this the harder it will be for them to get convictions.

----------------------------------------------

Here is what Attorney Dr Fred Whitehurst has to say about drug testing in crime labs.

Research in the subject of laboratory analysis and how it takes more than a simple field test to determine if a substance is actually marijuana. Surprisingly lawyers and judges rarely question the integrity of lab results and many people end up with criminal records

Instead of settling out of court, maybe these strategies will empower you to question the validity of how they go about testing marijuana and enforcing the law. If enough people are successful they will have no choice but to re-evaluate their stance on prohibition. Especially if they start losing more and more cases due to this strategy.

Take them to the task of proving what they have is actually marijuana. A sheriff with a field kit is not a botanist and just because it looks and smells like marijuana does not mean that it is. The burden of proof is on the prosecutor to prove it in fact actually is. If you can learn the facts behind their research and use it against them due to being unsatisfactory you got a shot at having your case dismissed.

Just because it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, does not mean you are a duck in the court of law. There are a lot of different ducks out there! Are you a mallard? How about a Muskogee?

If you take the time to read the Texas Tech PDF you will be amazed at the shortcomings of the research that was actually done to prove inconclusively that a substance is marijuana and no other type of "green, leafy, vegetable like substance that looks and smells like marijuana.

The laboratory protocols used to determine the forensic analysis of marijuana is not logical or valid. So take the time to read these PDF's and find out for yourselves why. Once you see the research I guarantee it will blow your mind.

Here is a good example of how the Texas Tech Law Review can help you.

According to North Carolina General Statutes 8-58.20 Forensic analysis admissible as evidence(My home state)

Sections B and C say:

(B) A forensic analysis, to be admissible under this section, shall be performed in accordance with rules or procedures adopted by the State Bureau of Investigation, or by another laboratory accredited by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB) for the submission, identification, analysis, and storage of forensic analyses. The analyses of DNA samples and typing results of DNA samples shall be performed in accordance with the rules or procedures of the State Bureau of Investigation or other ASCLD/LAB‑accredited laboratory.

(C) The analyst who analyzes the forensic sample and signs the report shall complete an affidavit on a form developed by the State Bureau of Investigation. In the affidavit, the analyst shall state (i) that the person is qualified by education, training, and experience to perform the analysis, (ii) the name and location of the laboratory where the analysis was performed, and (iii) that performing the analysis is part of that person's regular duties. The analyst shall also aver in the affidavit that the tests were performed pursuant to the ASCLD/LAB standards for that discipline and that the evidence was handled in accordance with established and accepted procedures while in the custody of the laboratory. The affidavit shall be sufficient to constitute prima facie evidence regarding the person's qualifications. The analyst shall attach the affidavit to the laboratory report and shall provide the affidavit to the investigating officer and the district attorney in the prosecutorial district in which the criminal charges are pending. An affidavit by a forensic analyst sworn to and properly executed before an official authorized to administer oaths is admissible in evidence without further authentication in any criminal proceeding with respect to the forensic analysis administered and the procedures followed.

Now also, since North Carolina is my state of residence I learned about corruption in the State Board of Investigations stated here in this article:

SBI veterans wrote and approved bad blood policy

Here are a few excerpts that are relative to where I am going with this.
For nearly two decades, the State Bureau of Investigation's habit of not reporting results of critical blood tests was unwritten and unofficial. Agent Duane Deaver, operating under unwritten orders, withheld test results that would have helped defendants such as Greg Taylor, who spent 17 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit.

Then, in 1997, the SBI put the practice in writing, and it didn't change.The task of writing the policy fell to Mark Nelson, a 25-year veteran agent who supervised and trained the agents who analyzed blood and DNA evidence. Nelson penned the policy that now is at the center of a controversy roiling the North Carolina criminal justice system.
That policy, approved by his superiors and then-SBI Director Jim Coman, embraced the practice of reporting positive results and withholding negative results, which favored the prosecution at the expense of defendants.

An outside audit of the unit Nelson trained and supervised found 229 cases where the bureau omitted or obscured critical test results from 1987 to 2003.

Nelson considered the primary consumer of the lab reports to be law enforcement, according to the audit. Current lab managers and analysts told the auditors they had a different view - their scientific analysis is for the criminal justice system as a whole, not just police and prosecutors.Nelson's view also conflicts with the landmark 2009 study on forensic sciences by the National Academies, the nation's top advisory board on science and medicine. The report said forensic scientists should operate independently of law enforcement.

A recent News & Observer series reported that SBI lab analysts pushed past the accepted bounds of science to deliver results pleasing to prosecutors. They are out of step with the larger scientific community and have fought defense attorneys' requests for information needed to review the SBI's work.

So basically what you have here is shoddy unethical practices in the states investigative forensic laboratories putting out supposedly validated forensics work and helping get convictions favoring law enforcement.

It's out there that North Carolina' State Bureau of Investigation (SBI) has a record of unscrupulous practices in order to obtain convictions for many years. So basically it is not beyond a stretch of the imagination to honestly question the integrity of their forensic lab results.

The law NC General Statute 8-58.20 paragraphs b and c say that before you issue a forensic report you have to follow the requirements of the American Society of Crime Lab Directors-Lab Accreditation Group. And you have to sign an affidavit that you ha

ve done just that. In other words you have to swear under oath that you have done that and if you lie then you have committed perjury.

I wonder how many affidavits were signed off by the SBI and caused people to go to jail...

Now take the Texas Tech Law Review, if you take the time to read it and check its references you will find that it is up to the prosecution to validate their protocol.

The bitch of it is though is that they actually cant! THERE ARE TOO MANY PLANTS TO CHECK OUT TO DETERMINE IF YOU HAVE IDENTIFIED MARIJUANA TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHER PLANTS! Out of the hundreds of thousands of plants out there on this planet, they have only tested 600 of them to see if they show up as positive for their field tests they use.
Its like filling up a 5 gallon bucket with only a drop of water and claiming that they can scientifically prove the bucket is full.
Defense attorneys need to learn how to start questioning lab results and not taking them as the gospel when they can easily be proven to be invalidated.

Reefer Madness II

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Sat, 12 Mar 2016 21:38:00 +0000

REEFER MADNESS II

Written by: John Kelly

Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act

The DEA has ‘’identified” more than identified over 400 new designer drugs in the United States” while admitting that ”many of the designer drugs being marketed today that were seized as part of Project Synergy are not specifically prohibited in the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), the Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 (AEA) allows many of these drugs to be treated as controlled substances if they are proven to be chemically and/or pharmacologically similar to a Schedule I or Schedule II controlled substance.”

The DEA has never provided or published any proof that designer synthetic drugs are chemically or pharmacologically similar to illegal controlled substances. In a recent court case, the DEA refused to provide such proof even when ordered to do so by the court. Heather Harris, who was the defense expert in the case and is one of the top forensic chemists in the country, specializing in controlled substances, has written that: ”DEA can add whatever it wants to the controlled substance schedules as long as they follow the rulemaking process. Are they deeming non-controlled substances as analogues without proof? Sure, but this information is not available to the public. It is not even really available to defendants.”

I did have a case recently plea that was an analog prosecution and the

> gov't never revealed which scheduled compound they were using for the

> analog comparison. I told the attorney repeatedly that this should be

> challenged b/c it is ludicrous to charge and prosecute someone and never

> reveal the elements of the offense. However, this was a juvenile and he

> needed finality more than justice I guess.

> It was a really sad case for this kid. He worked as a clerk in the head

> shop that was selling massive amounts of bath salts. He got swept up in

> the sting, charged with conspiracy and branded a felonious drug offender

> for the rest of his life. All for a minimum wage job. HEATHER HARRIS

According to the DEA: ” Synthetic cannabinoids represent the most significant class of designer synthetic drugs. According to the National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS), substances identified as synthetic cannabinoids by federal, state, and local forensic laboratories increased from 23 reports in 2009 to 32,784 reports in 2013; to 37,500 reports in 2014.”

In other words, thanks to a DEA ipse dixit, replete with anectdotal horror stories, reminiscent of Reefer Madness, there are now an additional 30,000+ marijuana convictions a year in the U.S., and the DEA’s sky’s the limit.

On April 26, 2012, Mahir Silmi and Mohammed Salem were indicted for trafficking and possession of Controlled Substances Analogues in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, and their attorney sought to exclude the lab reports as based purely on subjective observations.

Judge John Russo agreed and excluded the lab reports. He ruled that: ”Looking at the theory, this Court finds no objective, reliable test in the current testing of potential analogs by the CCRFSL (Cuyahoga County Regional Forensic Science Laboratory). The vague and undefined term of ‘substantially similar’ left the CCRFSL to devise an unguided subjective testing procedure. . . .

”Both of the State’s witnesses, Mr. Boggs and Mr. Sran, admit the CCRFSL test is a subjective test. Paul Boggs explained the subjective nature of their lab’s testing of potential analogs, describing ‘[I]t is based on something. I t is just not based on something the way we would like it to be based on.’ There is no statewide or nationwide resource or protocol for this lab to draw from and no formal organization or guidance regarding the testing of potential analogs. This leads the Court to the conclusion the current testing of the CCRFSL is not objective or derived from well-known facts and principles. It has never been formally peer-reviewed and no error rate has ever been determined. . .

”The theory of ‘substantially similar’ is too vague to be properly implemented. The lab has been left guessing if it is doing the right thing because there is no definition provide to it by any Federal or local government agency as to what ‘substantially similar’ means. CCRFSL was left to develop a test they hoped met this vague standard with no definition. .

”. . . it is hard to determine what would be an accurate result when there has been no peer review, no error rates determined, and no real comparison or common protocol even between counties in Ohio. This Court has no way to determine if there is general acceptance to this methodology because it has never been compared to any other lab’s methodology.”

Regarding the acceptability of controlled substance analogs evidence, the DEA is worse than the Cuyahoga County Regional Forensic Science Laboratory The DEA maintains no database, protocols, or any formal organization or mechanism of standardization regarding the testing of potential analogs. The DEA has not tested or validated its method; published no peer-review studies or error rates; and, has not shown general acceptance of its method in the scientific community. The DEA does not even have protocols, the bread-and-butter of any lab.

According to DEA lab director, James V. Malone:”The Mid-Atlantic Laboratory does not allow non-law enforcement visitors and has no established protocols, security personnel, or escort procedures in place. The Mid-Atlantic Laboratory also does not have observation rooms where outside personnel can view analysis. . .

”DEA's Standard Operating Procedures do not provide substantial information regarding what procedures a. chemist must follow in order to test a particular controlled substance. The DEA does not have such guidance set forth in one particular document type or "protocol" that would provide instruction on how one is to test cocaine or marijuana.”

==========================================

John Kelly, is a drug testing expert witness. He was nominated for a Pulitzer alongside Peter Wearne for a book titled. Tainting Evidence

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Killer Bud - Thanks John Kelly, for keeping folks posted about keeping the science real.

The test most commonly used by law enforcement is called the Duquenis - Levine test. If a substance is what it is supposed to be. the liquid inside the test turns blue.

It has been scientifically proven to give false positives from a long list of things. It has shown positive for chocolate, Tylenol, sage, powdered sugar, to name a few.

Considering there are millions of species of plants, it is suspect that a drug field test can determine a certain plant among-st all the other plant species out there, That was never done, they tested around 6000, but this is our governments assertion.

The government claims that their test is infallible, because they claim that the field test have been right 100% of the time when they do further analysis.

One one hand it gives false positives, yet they claim infallibility in courts. It seems unfair and biased to say it works every time, when it was basically a shot in the dark.

For more information, please check out John' Kelly's latest ebook

Amazon: Prevent your wrongful conviction with simple evidence

$2.99

Stop using law enforcement as a weapon of war against drugs!

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Sat, 05 Mar 2016 22:29:00 +0000

Lawfare: the use of the law as a weapon of war.

–– “Law and Military Interventions: Preserving Humanitarian Values in 21st -Century Conflicts” by Brigadier General (S) Charles J. Dunlap, Jr., USAF. In Humanitarian Challenges for Military Intervention, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, The Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, November 2001.

When it comes to the war on drugs, we have created a giant tiger, and now the tiger has to be fed. Unless we kill the fucking tiger... I assure you world, when the war on drugs ends, their will be no ticker taped parade. History will look back upon the war on drugs with condemnation, and contempt.

A war against drugs, is a war against people. Taking away the criminality, and refocusing on the healthcare aspect of drugs is going to eventually be the social norm one day, I hope. Until then, we have to sit back and see lives destroyed everyday because of the current state of our world's drug policies.

Anecdotal evidence from me personally, I have smoked cannabis for decades, but I could not hypothetically image me saying to myself one day. "Oh wow, all drugs are legal now, I think I'll go shoot up some heroin!"

Misinformation and fear mongering against drugs are the tools used against us to proliferate drug prohibition. The most pathetic excuse the government has used is "What about the children?" It has gotten to the point that the governments rhetoric to defend their failed prohibitionists policies, is to hide behind children and use them as a human meat shields.

Albuquerque baby receives hemp oil for epilepsy at Children's Hospital Colorado

What about the children? Maybe in a few years you can ask this child that question.

Take a look of these recent news articles illustrating the contrasts in current events of consequences that occur because of the war on drugs. By being aware, we can see the injustice. We can see progress to change things. There is hope.

Legal Marijuana Doing What The Drug War Couldn't
Proof that a regulatory market on cannabis has had negative economic effects on profits of drug cartels.

DC’s Legalized Weed Is One-Year Old, And Crime Has Cratered
Even though there is no regulated market, crime still went down exponentially.

Why billionaire drug warlords in Latin America owe their power to white-collar crooks from the US
Drug prohibition creates the drug cartels

Saudi Arabia; beheads three convicted drug traffickers
Why are people being legally executed for drugs in this day and age? It is barbaric.

Why harm reduction and drug policy reform need each other
More insight into making the case for harm reduction instead of fighting the war on drugs.

War on Drugs Takes Center Stage at UN as Global Leaders and International Activists Assemble in NY

"In April, the world will come together to talk about drugs. The United Nations will host a General Assembly Special Session on Drugs (UNGASS), the most significant high-level international drug policy event in almost two decades. At the last UNGASS in 1998, the international community met under the slogan "A drug free world - We can do it!" and committed itself to this unrealistic goal. Fortunately, we've come a long way since then. This time, when global leaders meet at the UN to discuss drugs once again, the farce of a drug free world will be far away. Influential voices from around the world are calling for new approaches to drug policy, countries and cities are experimenting with innovative reforms, and a global movement has emerged calling for an end to the failed prohibitionist policies of the past. From April 18 to 21, people from all over the world will be descending upon New York City to demand change."

When it really comes right down to it, the US government most likely will not change it's federal polices on drugs until something is amended by the United Nations.

In the mean time, if you realize that drug prohibition laws are unjust, and if you become a juror, you do not have to find someone guilty. Research Jury Nullification.

Jury Nullification: Why Every American Needs to Learn This Taboo Verdict

Will Cannabis Consumers Flock To Alaska? We Find Out In November.

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Mon, 21 Jul 2014 02:03:00 +0000

November is possibly going to be very historic once again in the cannabis reform movement. Alaska has officially put their hat in the ring for full on cannabis legalization. I can imagine their are a lot of happy Alaskans up there, just getting it on the ballot. Congratulations Alaskans! Now vote it in! California tried unsuccessfully to legalize cannabis during a midterm election. Maybe Alaska will break the midterm cycle of bad luck.

I remember years ago when I lived up there, I was listening to the radio one day and a guy called into the radio station complaining about cannabis being illegal. The DJ quickly retorted "If you stoners hadn't of gotten high and forgot to vote, it would be legal right now!" It kinda stuck in my mind that if we want change we are going to have to vote it in. Because we cannot count on our politicians it seems like to do anything.

The cannabis economy will flourish up there since they would have direct access to another cannabis friendly state, Washington. I can already see the ferry's bringing down some Alaskan Thunder Fuck. Which happens to be a nice uplifting sativa by the way. They probably prefer something uplifting up there, especially on those long nights.

There are a lot of things to see and do in Alaska, with cannabis it would be so much better.

Here are a few good suggestions if you are lucky enough to get up that way.

First off, I would strongly recommend Chena Hot Springs. It is about 60 miles NE of Fairbanks, AK. Just imagine what it would be like smoking a joint in a hot springs bordering the arctic circle. Surrounded by mountains, and clear starry skies dancing with the aurora borealis!

Chena Hot Springs Website

I wouldn't recommend getting high before you attempt this, but if you can manage to stash something and keep it dry, you might be ready to burn one after the ride!

White water rafting, Denali National Park

Getting high and fishing is always one of my favorite activities. If you like fishing, well up in Alaska, you might end up with lots of folks who like to fish just as much as you do. Ever heard of combat fishing? It's where you have a bunch of fisherman in the same area fishing over each other. If you had a doobie you might not mind it so bad when your line gets tangled from some overzealous fisherman next to you.

Hopefully our Alaskan brothers and sisters will vote for legalizing cannabis in November. Until then keep having those green dreams!

"Beat Marijuana Charges Without Plea Bargaining" Update

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Tue, 20 May 2014 23:09:00 +0000

"Beat Marijuana Charges Without Plea Bargaining" has been hijacked from the author on Amazon.com.

Since the books release last August, the author John Kelly has not received one dime from his book. Also he has been unable to monitor/edit the account, or to even see how many books he has sold.

John Kelly is an expert on the forensic identification of cannabis and the drug testing procedures used to determine if a substance is cannabis. He was nominated a Pulitzer alongside Peter Wearne for the book "Tainting Evidence" He also co-published an article with the Marijuana Policy Project called "False Positives Equals False Justice"

The book goes into great detail about junk science and poor practices in federal/state forensic crime labs. Using current cases in the news about how drug tests were manipulated to falsely get convictions. How Lab Techs are being swayed by prosecutors to get convictions.

It seems like people would want to learn more about this book, but unfortunately any promotion of the book right now is being held back.

A supposed friend of John Kelly who lives on the other side of the country was entrusted to help him publish it through Amazon. Several months after the book was published I was notified by John Kelly that he was getting the run around from the guy who published his book.

John gave me the persons name and number and I personally called him to get some clarification of his intent with the account. He explained to me that he was currently homeless and he had no access to a computer. Shortly afterwards he mentioned having a smartphone... The person promised he would get in touch with me or John Kelly as soon as possible to straighten up the account.

Since then several months have passed and no commitments were ever followed through.

I consulted a bit about the subject in Amazon support forum. They alluded to hiring lawyers and courts if the person doesn't comply.

Compliance would simply be handing John Kelly the account name and password from Amazon and Kindle.

As a personal friend of John Kelly, I know firsthand that he has gone through. He has had ill health and severe depression. He spent over 5 years of his life doing research for this book. John has been helping people fight convictions. Sometimes for free, or maybe by reading one his articles on the internet. He really wants a chance to show you the evidence, but right now, his hands are tied.

In the meantime I am leaving my Amazon link on the side of my blog. I still want people to be aware of it. Check it out, it is relevant, but please don't buy it from my account link. I will not be promoting this book any further until John Kelly has been returned possession of the account.

Don't take Pictures of Your Marijuana Crop With A Cell Phone!

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Tue, 13 Aug 2013 18:52:00 +0000

Imagine, if you will. You worked hard all summer long toting water to your cannabis plants. Traveling way into the woods, you know, OPP (other peoples property.) One day you look at one of your plants, and you decide to take a picture of it. A little time goes by. Hell, you probably done smoked it by now, and you decide to share the picture online.

Next year comes, everything seems cool, you're getting ready to harvest your plants, and Bam! Out of nowhere you got a SWAT team surrounding you with guns in your face!

How did they figure out where to find your cannabis plants and bust you? You might be pondering. Well, that picture of that sweet cannabis plant you took a picture of a year before, it had a location code written into the picture, and all the police had to do is read it and find out where your crop was using global positioning.

This scenario can happen. So, be warned, and be careful what pictures you take with a smartphone. When you're heading to the crop, just don't take your phone with you.

Why Do Prosecutors Try To "Weed Out" Potential Jurors Aware Of Jury Nullification?

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:40:00 +0000

I never heard of someone utilizing a Jury Nullification Defense until I started writing to Ed Forchion aka The New Jersey Weedman a few years ago. I have been following his case and was very proud to see him follow through on his endeavor to actually try and persuade at least one jury member that the law was wrong, not him. Not only did he follow through, but he got an intent to distribute charge dismissed by unanimous decision.

Photograph of NJ Weedman courtesy of James Babb.

He also defended himself! Nowadays, lawyers are looking at cannabis arrests as easy money. Most folks just plea out. Attorneys don't have to do anything but show up in court, have you sign a piece of paper for a plea deal, and pick up their check at the end of the day. So right off, if you're busted this is what the lawyer is pretty much expecting to do.

Most people who have something to gain from cannabis prohibition are the one's that are most likely opposed to legalization. I suspect most attorneys would not like to see cannabis cases disappearing from the courts. I put most attorneys in the same category of other people who profit from cannabis being illegal such as Private Prisons, Correctional Officer Unions, Police Departments depending on financial assistance for Federal Subsidy's for cannabis arrests quotas, to the Pharmaceutical Industry.

They're so many variables out there now that make the case to defend yourself more possible than ever before. Maybe if someone went into a court armed with this knowledge, they might seriously consider opting out of a plea deal and considering Jury Nullification.

- First, changing public opinion on cannabis has increased exponentially over the past few years. To the point now where 18 states plus Washington DC have legalized medicinal use of cannabis. 2 States Washington and Colorado have completely legalized it. Odds are at least one person on a jury can be cannabis friendly. Now if they are aware of jury nullificatiojn, you could most likely go home a free person.

- More and more people are less interested in our government spending money to enforce cannabis laws. It has gotten to the point where it is more expensive to incarcerate someone for a year than a year in college!

After 40 years, $1 trillion, US War on Drugs has failed to meet any of its goals

- People are becoming more and more aware how racially based the arrests for cannabis is and was. In 48 states, the arrest rate between blacks and whites is disproportionately higher for blacks. In Iowa for example, the population of blacks in their state is 3%, yet they make up 79% of the arrests for cannabis.

United States Marijuana Possession Arrest Rates by State and Race (2006)

-This is a big one: Government Credibility enforcing cannabis prohibition. If you were to Google "Is the government lying about marijuana?" The first thing that pops up and many more after are many documented referrals stating that this is the case.

A good example of this was recently when the Mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomburg said that Medicinal Cannabis was "The greatest hoaxes of all time"

Mayor Bloomberg Medical Cannabis "One of gratest hoxes of all time"

While he was saying this, the New England Journal of Medicine is releasing a survey from doctors saying that 76% would prescribe cannabis to their patients if they were allowed.

New England Journal of Medicine survey 76% of doctors would prescribe cannabis"

Considering New York City is known worldwide for it's racial profiling stop and frisk policy. Spiking cannabis arrests by making people put personal cannabis in public view for a more egregious penalty. I would believe doctors over politicians and law enforcement any day regarding the medicinal benefits of cannabis... It truly is a healthcare issue, not a criminal issue.

NYPD Narcotics Detective Admits Cops Regularly Plant Drugs On Perps

- DEA being dishonest and refusing to admit that cannabis is less dangerous than heroin or that it has no medicinal use is another example. Considering the government has a patent on medicinal cannabis, it really shows just how schizophrenic our government is on this policy.

U.S. Government Licenses Patent for Medical Marijuana

Last year Congressman Jared Polis from Colorado questioned the head of the DEA, Michelle Leonhart. She repeatedly refused to give the congressman an clear honest answer. The congressman was trying to have a straight open debate and all he got was the run around.

The governments lack of credibility enforcing cannabis prohibition is out there for everyone to see, but unfortunately when a defendant goes to trial they'll most likely be unable to effectively attack the government's credibility, and prosecutors are hoping a potential juror is uneducated to these facts. In a nutshell a perfect juror for the prosecution is an ignorant juror... For a defense lawyer that's the last thing they would want.

All these things are out there for one to discover for a potential juror. If they can realize how unjust this law is, maybe we can finally change cannabis laws once and for all.

- Junk Science

All over the country there have been multitudes of cases where drug testing labs have tainted evidence to support the prosecution. Most folks do not realize that the drug testing procedures used to determine if a substance is cannabis is supposed to be a subjective test not a definitive one, yet although it is admissible as evidence in court, it commonly gives false positives for cannabis with a multitude of other substances.

A miscarriage of justice on marijuana US police are using a flawed scientific test in drugs busts that gives 'false positives' to strongarm citizens into plea bargaining

A few years ago, I was on a Grand Jury for several months. I helped several people have cannabis cases dismissed, from possession to intent to distribute. To the chagrin of visibly irate police officers, because they could not sway my vote to have them prosecuted. I kind of rocked the boat when they realized they had a cannabis friendly juror and they were not able to do anything about it.

Part of being on that Grand Jury was they give you a tour of the jail, and the sheriff gives the tour. I still remember how he had a gleeful tone in his voice and a twinkle in his eye when he invited us to his next big asset forfeiture auction. He was telling us about all the cars he had acquired and hoped that the folks would stop on by and support their sheriffs department.

So I believe the reason why prosecutors don't want a juror to know about jury nullification are because they know that if people were to be aware of this that they would lose. The big bad tiger called government does not like losing. They will intentionally screen out potential jurors who they think will impose jury nullification, or are aware of it. If you contest a cannabis charge, they feel impelled to stack the deck against you to use the jurors to support their weak law.

When it comes down to it, if that's what they have to do to win, then we are truly winning. More and more folks need to be educated about jury nullification to the point where prosecutors will have no choice but to accept them on jury pools..

In the meantime if you're selected for jury duty and you support cannabis legalization , Do your duty, be professional, and keep your mouth shut until it is time to deliberate. You don't have to explain to the other jurors why you think a person is not guilty. You just have to say to yourself "The law is wrong, not them"

If you want to become more educated on Jury Nullification, this is a good place to start.

http://fija.org/

Drug Testing: A Flawed Forensic Science Causing Wrongful Convictions

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:24:00 +0000

Written by: John Kelly

The VIP unspoken part of this article (see below) is that forensic science from its inception up until and continuing now has been systemically flawed, including of course all drug testing, resulting in untold numbers of wrongful convictions. My point is poignantly illustrated by the quoting of the new president of the American Academy of Sciences, Barry Logan, who has been implicated in extensive fraud in 2010 by massive evidence and the opinions of no fewer than 7 judges, inter alia. And He the new president!

U.S. to commit scientists and new commission to fix forensic science

Attached is a recent decision in Ohio rejecting drug test result evidence as well governmental expert testimony.
The decision is scientifically and legally rock solid and applies equally to marijuana testing and is something
I've been saying for five years.

Excluded of drug analog evidence, Ohio

Attached also are excerpts from my forthcoming book: Beat Marijuana Charges Without Plea Bargaining.

DEA Claims Scientific Impossibility

Lindsay's Correspondence

MA Police Marijuana Protocols

Killer Bud Update: Just today after posting this article for John Kelly I found this article:

Speed Bump On The Rocket Docket

Speed Bump on the Rocket Docket

False-positive field tests derail drug prosecutions

By Jordan Smith, Fri., Feb. 22, 2013

Rosemary Lehmberg

Photo by John Anderson

For the time being at least, Travis County's "rocket docket" has been grounded.
The docket was designed in 2002 to ease jail overcrowding by expediting lower-level drug possession cases – which account for roughly a third of the criminal case docket – by allowing defendants to waive indictment and plead guilty based in part on the results of police-administered field testing of suspected drugs.

And so it went, and well, for more than a decade, with very few cases overturned or dismissed based on false-positive field drug tests. At least that's how it was until January, said District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg, when prosecutors realized that since August 2012 there had been an unprecedented string of 12 false-positive field tests in rocket-docket cases. Since then, she's conferred with the courts and with Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo before ultimately deciding to slow the docket and not accept any pleas until after a final drug test has been reported back from the APD's lab. And because the lab is short-staffed and backlogged, that means the docket's speediness will, for now, be reduced to a crawl.

In fact, the APD lab hasn't been keeping up with the county's criminal justice system, as that system's reliance on scientific evidence – including chemical drug analysis – has grown. The rocket docket used to move as swiftly as its name implies – in 2009, cases on that docket took an average of just 11 days to close. But as the general backlog at the crime lab has increased, so too has the amount of time taken to return to prosecutors the final lab reports in these otherwise expedited cases. Lehmberg said the average turnaround time for a final lab report had been roughly 14 days; by last summer, that had stretched to nearly two months. (City Council last week voted to give APD an additional $180,000 this year to hire three forensic chemists to help reduce the lab's general backlog; see "Budget Games.")

Despite that growing lag time, that delay isn't ultimately what has slowed the rocket docket. Rather, it's the number of false-positive field tests for drugs that prompted Lehmberg to put on the brakes. Essentially, the field tests help move the docket; for example, if cops find what they believe is a small baggie of cocaine on a person they've stopped, they'll employ a field test – essentially a chemical reaction test – to check their assumptions. If the substance reacts positively, they'll pop the person for possession of cocaine and send the baggie off to the lab for a final, conclusive test. In the meantime, however, the defendant, now slated for the rocket docket, is given an opportunity to plead guilty before indictment and before that final test is performed – a process that reduces jail time and helps unclog the criminal dockets. But in 12 recent cases, the final lab results have come back with a finding of no "controlled substances detected," even though a field test came back positive.

Exactly why the tests have come back false-positive isn't clear. Lehmberg says she's been told that it's a recent problem, not just in Travis County, but "everywhere." She and Acevedo said the issue in part is that the field tests aren't precise enough to detect what sort of "–caine" suffixed drug they're detecting. Indeed, it may not be cocaine that the person has been sold, but may be an adulterated drug with an anesthetic base, like lidocaine or benzocaine – both dangerous drugs (possession of either is a Class A misdemeanor, Lehmberg said), but neither as tightly controlled as cocaine, classified as a narcotic.

Whether the field tests are truly false, or whether they're simply not precise enough, is something that Lehmberg is currently trying to determine. She said she's requested the lab notes for each of the 12 cases that have come to her attention, to see if there was actually no drug detected by APD chemists or if there is some other drug there, but not cocaine. If the latter, those cases might need to be reconsidered for misdemeanor prosecution, she said. For now, however, she's not "willing to let people plead [guilty] without a lab report," she said. "Right this minute, until we figure this out, we're not pleading any more cases."

Election Results: Cannabis Versus President Obama 2012

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:56:00 +0000

I started doing a statistical tally of how President Obama did in comparison to all the cannabis initiatives that were also going on around the country.

I'll start off with legalization measures, then do states that had medical cannabis measures.

Colorado:

Good job!

Amendment 64 got 1,291,771 (54.8%) votes for it, and 1,064,342 (45.1%) voted against it.
In contrast President Obama received 1,238,490 (51%) votes.
That means that cannabis legalization was more popular than President Obama by 53,281 voters in the state of Colorado.

Washington:

Good job!

Initiative 502 got 1,056,355 (55.44%) for it, and 848,919 (44.56%) against it.
President Obama got 1,187,256 (55.25%) of the states vote.
In Washington, President Obama got only 131,101 more votes than cannabis legalization.

Oregon:

Nice try!

State Ballot Measure No: 80 got 753,952 (46.29%) votes for it, and 874,945 (53.71%) voted against it.
President Obama received 907,351 votes. That's 153,399 more votes than cannabis

Massachusetts:

Good job!

Yes Medical Marijuana got 1,895,340 (63%) for it, and 1,097,797 (37%) against it.
President Obama got 1,900,575 (60.88%) He only got 5,235 votes more than medicinal cannabis.

Arkansas:

Damn close!

Issue 5 got 502,419 (49%) for it, and 532,419 (51%) against it. It was defeated by exactly 30,000 votes.
President Obama got 390,339 (39%) of the states votes. In Arkansas, medicinal cannabis was more popular than the President by a whooping 112,080 voters.

Summary:

In total, there were 5,529,837 voters for cannabis reform, and 4,418,422 voters against cannabis reform.

The total amount of voters who voted for cannabis reform outnumbered those against it by 1,111,415 votes.

Cannabis reform got 5,529,837 total votes, and President Obama got 5,624,011 total votes in Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Massachusetts, & Arkansas .

President Obama barely beat cannabis reform by 94,174 votes

--------------------------------------------

The Drug War's Forgotten Children

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:22:00 +0000

One of the most common counterpoints to cannabis prohibition is the argument "What about the children?"

Suburban parents with teenagers can understandably overcompensate by being overly protective when it comes to their children and drugs. In no way do I begrudge a parent for wanting to protect their children. In fact, I'd do the same. However, I don't believe our country's current drug policies are the best way to protect them.

If the people who support cannabis prohibition want to use the argument "what about the children?" it is imperative to take into consideration all children ... not just the children in the United States. My argument is what is the best policy for ALL of the children? For one moment put yourself in the position of a parent in Mexico, where the drug policies of another nation affect your own children negatively, yet you have no recourse ... no way to vote, or establish means to correct the problem.

How has the United States' drug war negatively affected children in Mexico and Latin America? I have compiled some research that demonstrates how cannabis prohibition hurts children in other countries, as well as the United States. References and quotes are based off websites that report news:

Shootout at Mexican hospital (Youtube video, embedding is disabled)

This video shows parents with small children fleeing a hospital because two victims of drug cartel violence were being treated there, so the attackers went there to finish off the job. Doctors and nurses lives are threatened if they treat gunshot patients. Ambulance drivers and first responders take a chance every time they attempt to save someones life.

You never hear about drug cartels shooting up a hospital and assassinating people in the U.S.

Border Patrol agent fires at rock-throwers in Mexico, killing teen

In this article, a Border Patrol agent shot and killed a Mexican teen throwing rocks at him from across the border. The Border Patrol agent was there responding to a call to investigate alleged drug smuggling activity.

Another teen died the same way just 2 years ago. According to this article, the family tried to sue the United States government for the unlawful death of their child and failed. Here is why.

"Border agents are generally allowed to use lethal force against rock throwers.
In 2010, a 15-year-old boy was shot and killed by a Border Patrol agent firing his weapon from El Paso, Texas, into Juarez, Mexico. Some witnesses said people on the Mexican side of the river, including the teen, were throwing rocks at the agent as he tried to arrest an illegal immigrant crossing the Rio Grande.

A federal judge in El Paso last year dismissed a lawsuit by the family of the boy because the teen was on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande when he was shot. U.S. law gives the government immunity when such claims arise in a foreign country, the judge noted."

Mexico Teen Assassin Arrested, Suspected Of 50 Killings

"Mexican prosecutors said Thursday they were investigating a 16-year-old suspected hitman who was believed to have participated in at least 50 murders while working for a drug gang.

A spokesman for prosecutors in the northeastern state of Sinaloa said the teenager, identified as Francisco Miguel N., was part of a gang known as Los Mazatlecos, a criminal group attached to the Beltran Leyva drugs cartel.

Police arrested the teen for carrying a loaded gun and drugs. He later confessed to working as a hitman for the group, local prosecutors said in a statement.

The teenager said he had taken part in executions of police, farmers and even a musician since February.

The 16-year-old, one of whose nicknames was "El Nino" or "The Boy," said he was given an AK-47 rifle and a pistol to carry out the various attacks in Sinaloa, a violent coastal state with a long tradition of drug trafficking.

Sinaloa is home to the powerful drug cartel of the same name, led by Mexico's most wanted man, Joaquin "Shorty" Guzman. Once allied to Guzman, the Beltran Leyva gang has fought with him since breaking from the Sinaloa cartel in 2008.

A number of teenagers have been captured working for drug gangs, lured by the prospect of quick money. In June 2011, a group of six teenage drug gang members were captured after a shootout with police in central Mexico."

U.S. teen admits to beheading 4 for Mexico drug gang

"MEXICO CITY — Mexican troops captured a 14-year-old U.S. citizen said to have specialized in beheadings as an assassin for one of Mexico's most vicious drug gangs. His pay: $2,500 a killing.

Soldiers detained Edgar Jimenez late Thursday at an airport outside Cuernavaca, 50 miles south of Mexico City, as he prepared to board a flight to Tijuana."

"I didn't know what I was doing," Jimenez said, according to media accounts, but added that he was paid $2,500 per killing. Army officials accused Jimenez's sister, identified as 19-year-old Elizabeth, of also working for the gang. Neither has been formerly charged.

Jimenez said he was sorry to have gotten involved both with Mexican gangsters and with killing people. If he beats the charges, he said, he'll change his ways.

"I didn't join," he said of his gangland career, which reportedly began when he was 12. "They pulled me in."

Mexicans Pay in Blood for America's War on Drugs

"Molly Molloy, a researcher at New Mexico State University, tallies more than 100,000 Mexicans killed to wage a war financed and mandated by American authorities and led by Mexican president Felipe Calderón.

The carnage has been so remarkable — mass executions, beheadings, mutilations, men, women, children — that the outgoing Calderón has announced he may leave the country lest he become a statistic.

And yet on July 4, the New York Times declared the War on Drugs a cruel failure, claiming that the price of cocaine, for example, is 74 percent cheaper now than it was 30 years ago. America has spent $20 billion to $25 billion a year to stem the flow of narcotics, to no good end."

Mexico's growing legion of narco orphans

"Decapitated bodies. Murder victims hanging from bridges. Blood crusted on street curbs where an assassin has struck. These are the gruesome images the world has come to associate with Mexico's drug war. But, out of view, the plight of so-called narco orphans like Bryan is just as haunting. It may also foretell more mayhem in the years to come.

With shoddy education standards and poor career prospects already holding back Mexico's youth, people like Casas worry about the impact on society of tens of thousands of kids growing up emotionally traumatized and with their prospects for building a better life for themselves in tatters.
"There is an enormous cost because these kids aren't children as they should be. They are future criminals. What other aspirations are they going to have? What kind of future awaits them?" Casas said over an uncomfortably early supper in a brightly lit mall in Ciudad Juarez, where these days people avoid side streets and don't stay out after dark.

Neither Mexico's government nor the various independent groups studying organized crime keep track of the number of narco orphans who have lost fathers, and sometimes mothers too, to the drug war."

Gunmen kill 13 at birthday party in Mexico

"I threw myself down on the floor and then a lot of other people piled on top of me," a young man who survived the shooting late on Friday told Reuters, declining to give his name out of fear of reprisals."

The celebration was for a boy's 15th birthday, he said.

At least four of the people killed at the house party were teenagers and a 9-year-old boy was among the wounded, officials said.

"A group of heavily armed men arrived in two minivans. At least 10 men burst into the party," Carlos Gonzalez, a spokesman for state prosecutors, told the Reforma newspaper.

Mexican President Felipe Calderon condemned the shooting, saying it caused "deep outrage."

Teen survives being shot, dangled from bridge

MONTERREY, Mexico —

A kicking, screaming teenager with a gunshot wound was found dangling from a rope over a busy highway Wednesday in the northern Mexican city of Monterrey. Police said another man alongside him was dead by the time rescuers arrived and a third was found dead below.

Witnesses told police that a group of gunmen descended from a vehicle and hanged the men off a bridge around 10 a.m., stopping traffic along one of the busiest routes in Mexico's third-largest city, which has been plagued by drug-gang violence.

All three of the men had been shot and tortured, and their hands were bound with duct tape, said a Nuevo Leon state police investigator who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the case.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The evidence I have presented should be compelling enough for anyone to see. The United States needs to make a huge step in the right direction, by ending cannabis prohibition. This act alone would cut drug cartel finances by 70%, and it would make law enforcement easier there to protect it's people.

If you support cannabis prohibition then you also support this kind of activity here in the United States:

The skateboarding 17-year-old drug kingpin who earned $20,000 a month from marijuana trade

"On the surface, he was a small-town high school student, but cops say an Ohio teen was cleaning up as the kingpin of a major marijuana operation - and even his mother was in the dark about it.

The teen, who has not been identified, had six lieutenants, selling as much as $20,000 of high-grade homegrown marijuana every month to high school students in Mason, Ohio.

Investigators said those who participated in the sophisticated operation were careful not to do business on school grounds where they knew it was riskier.

And all this before he graduated.

The 17-year-old high school student was the center of a high-grade marijuana distribution ring that operated in two Cincinnati-area schools, the Warren County Drug Task Force said Monday.

A yearlong investigation culminated in the arrest of the teen and seven adults, as well as the seizure of more than 600 hydroponically grown marijuana plants with a street value of around $3million, the agency said."

Outside America, the "What about the children?" argument is nothing but rhetoric and rings a hollow tone.

Ending cannabis prohibition is the best policy for ALL children.

Alternatives for cannabis reform during an election cycle that ignores it

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:14:00 +0000

I read this article today. It concerned the war on drugs in Mexico, and the new president elect's participatory strategy to fight it.

Since 2006 War on drugs has caused 100,000 deaths in Mexico.

About 4 paragraphs into the article, I read this:

"Recently released government figures place Mexico's total homicide tally from 2007 to 2011 at 99,632, a number that will easily surpass 100,000 by the time President Felipe Calderón ends his term."

Back in the 1990's, I lived in El Paso for several years. I spent many trips across the border and never once felt uneasy walking around Juarez with my family or by myself. I even got to spend a lot of time in Mexico when I was a kid back in the 1970's with my mom and step dad. It was quite a wake up call to be introduced to a completely different culture compared to suburban America with my Luke Skywalker hover pod action set.

I saw children begging for money, old ladies that would superstitiously turn away from a passing glance in fear of getting the evil eye. People living in homes made out of palm fronds and dirt floors.
I remember seeing a solstice festival at some Aztec ruins with people spinning around upside down hang by a rope tied to their feet way up in the air. I met really nice people in Mexico, and it has always been a positive experience that I have fondly looked back upon. So, I have had in interest in watching what has been going on in Mexico for many years.

Nowadays, I wouldn't go to Mexico if you paid me.

What is often neglected (Especially in our current elections) is the big picture of the America's war on drug policies in one country adversely affecting surrounding countries.

I am worried about what our next President of the United States will do to fix cannabis policies.

Considering Mitt Romney has roots in Mexico as well, you would think he would be enlightened enough that he would realize how our policies in the United states have negatively affected Mexico. 100,000 deaths in less than 6 years is not insignificant.

I wonder what Mitt Romney would tell the next President of Mexico if he got elected? " I'm sorry President Enrique Peña Nieto, don't waste my time with that silly insignificant drug war issue." His current foreign policy to our neighboring country is execrable.

Mitt Romney is not even altruistic towards the disabled either. Check out his contemptuous reaction to being questioned by a man in a wheelchair about his policy towards medicinal cannabis. He is totally against cannabis reform even medical.

So in a nutshell Mitt Romney does not care about our peoples health issues. I bet if alcohol was still prohibited, he would not end alcohol prohibition under his watch either.

As far as president Obama goes, he has been the Hypocrite in Chief regarding cannabis reform.

- Between giving executive privilege to Eric Holder over the whistle-blowing incident called Fast and Furious, and over 300 people dying because the guns were intended for drug cartels.

- The constant attempts of ignoring cannabis policies when Americans speak out to discuss the issue in his public town-hall forums online.

- The closings and raids of legal medical cannabis dispensaries. While promising as a candidate to honor states rights concerning cannabis.

- Denying in an interview in Rolling Stone magazine, that he did not have the ability to change cannabis laws on his own. Which is completely untrue!
President Obama can reschedule cannabis with a stroke of a pen using executive privilege. He only uses that card when his main guy in the Dept of Justice gets his ass in a sling over selling guns to drug cartels.

- By the time President Obama finishes his first term as President of the United States, 3.2 million people will of been arrested for cannabis prohibition.

-During this election so far President Obama has not gone on the record regarding anything about the war on drugs. It has seemed like it has been purposely avoided by him. I guess 100,000 deaths, and 3.2 million cannabis arrests must seem insignificant to him as well.

The other option we have is the third party candidate. Libertarian candidate for President Gary Johnson has a more worldly view on the war on drugs and has a good record as Governor of New Mexico.

I recently got a chance to listen to him speak at the demonstration area at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, NC this past week.

uu

Gary Johnson is on the right track, and hopefully other politicians will come around to his way of thinking regarding cannabis policy. Gary Johnson is on the ballot on all 50 states. Unfortunately he does not have a very good chance at all of being elected.

In the end, it is my hope that Gary Johnson succeeds in bringing cannabis reform into the light much the same way Ron Paul did when it came to bringing attention to the Federal Reserve and having it audited.

The world is walking away from America's policies on the war on drugs. A global commission on drug policy, backed many many world leaders, was recently shunned by the United States. We are no longer looking like a legitimate freedom caring nation in the eyes of the world.

Sure there are other important matters to the country that should come first. Everyone wants more jobs and a stable economy, but cannabis reform shouldn't be ignored. It is not an insignificant issue.

In summary, I do not see any change in the right direction in this Presidential election. People will succumb to being force fed the lesser of two evils and the status quot will endeavor to persevere.

More and more states will become cannabis friendly, but our Federal Government will not.

That leads me to this. Until we can change cannabis laws we can legally challenge them.

Cannabis arrests don't have to mean easy money for the government if more and more people challenge the law in court.

Do like NJ Weedman did, and encourage your friends and other activists to stand outside a courthouse with signs explaining Jury Nullification. He utilized the internet and social media to gain support to help contest his marijuana possession charges.

Or consider this before you take a plea deal...

How about contesting the evidence?

When one is arrested for marijuana charges, regardless of the circumstances or what the person believes he/she possesses, the prosecution has to subsequently scientifically prove the presence of marijuana in any seized substance. The most commonly used test is the Duquenois-Levine. But studies have showed, the Duquenois-Levine test does not prove the presence of marijuana. Theoretically then, if the defense attorney working with an expert, challenges the “proof,” the case should be dismissed.

Consider contesting the evidence before a plea deal, and if the judge admits the evidence. then try to utilize jury nullification in the court.

If you would like more information on locating a drug test expert witness to contest cannabis charges, fill out the contact form on the link below.

BEAT MARIJUANA CHARGES.COM

Kottonmouth Kings - Mr Cali Man feat (feat. Ceekay Jones

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 19:13:00 +0000

Kottonmouth Kings - Mr Cali Man feat (feat. Ceekay Jones

President Obama's Message of "Don't get caught"

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Mon, 18 Jun 2012 00:08:00 +0000

Recently I found this meme on Facebook, and it got a reaction out of me. I got to thinking just how true and profound it really was. All it would of taken is one arrest, and our present time would be completely different.

I sat in front of my computer, smoking a joint, and watched the smoke dispersing into the room as I exhale. I starting thinking deeper into it, wondering what would have happened if a young Barack Obama/Barry Sotero was hanging out with his friends, having a good time, and ended up getting busted with an ounce of cannabis. .

I took another hit off my pipe, looking around the room, bothering nobody, and wondered why almost a million people a year were going to get arrested for cannabis. A million dreamers aspirations of lifetime goals and possibilities thrown aside. The day after a drug bust they wake up to a new life, with a new label, a criminal.

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting to get a different result. The war on cannabis has proven to be the epitome of insanity.

------------------------------------

I had an idea for a meme, and it went viral. Within a few hours it had gotten shared to tens of thousands of people on Facebook! The icing on the cake though, was when I started seeing people I don't even know, tweeting it directly to Barack Obama. I have had a great time time reading peoples perspectives on it, and I can tell that it kind of touched a nerve.

Anyways I think I had made a pretty good point with it. That being the blatant hypocrisy our President has committed by continuing to ignore the peoples desire to end the war on cannabis. It was good enough for him to do it, flippantly bragging about it to look all hip and shit. Why can't he do the right thing and just put his pen on a piece of paper and reschedule cannabis. Why should more and more people be busted for what he is guilty of doing himself?

Considering the ratio of blacks getting arrested compared to whites is staggering. He is so frigging lucky he had never gotten arrested. In every single state in the United States, except for one, (Hawaii) more blacks are arrested than whites.

Marijuana Possession Arrest Rates by State and Race (2006)

So what kind of choice is a person supposed to have come November? A hypocrite, or the 250 million dollar man? I don't care for republicans at all. For one reason the Republicans have traditionally opposed cannabis reform, the majority of them view it as being soft on criminals.

I read in The New York Times, that Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., said that half of the 6,200 people who were charged with low-level marijuana possession last year in Manhattan had never been arrested before.

No one wants our politicians, or our police to be soft on criminals. Instead of considering someone who is arrested for the first time in their life because of cannabis a criminal....Why not consider them just a person? We already incarcerate more people than any other country in the world, so why should we just exasperate the problem further?

......................................................................................

On another note, I read today where a local law enforcement have gone so far out of their way to get a cannabis arrest.They used constant surveillance of a hydroponic shop to go after people who purchased there. Taking tag numbers and looking up addresses, then fabricating tips to search homes.

"Narcotics detectives pursuing indoor pot farmers have been put on leave, accused of breaking the law and lying to judges. Prosecutors have had to drop charges."

Pinellas Sheriff's Race Clouded By Marijuana Busts

The question I have to ask is. What motivated these police officers to lie to a judge, just to set someone up for a cannabis charge? What is motivating the police to go so far to violate someone's civil liberties by invading their privacy, and profiling people based simply by where they shopped?

I can only guess it is by pressure from their commanders to specifically target cannabis users so they can acquire Federal Subsidies set aside for quotas of cannabis arrests. How much is it up to now for a local police department? A million bucks?...More?

Maybe our police are getting a sick thrill out of taking a persons home and assets away from them in a seizure, and selling them at police auctions.

Cannabis has never killed anyone, but law enforcement treats cannabis users like criminals, and somehow they should be public enemy number one, and they have no problem lying to a judge to convict someone.

The tired excuse of we don't make the laws we just enforce them, rings hollow to someone when police go out of their way to oppose cannabis reform. Mainly for financial reasons instead of what would be best for our communities.

Look at the bigger picture, our countries DEA, ILLEGALLY sold guns to drug cartels. The guns have been linked to over 200 murders in Mexico, and an American Border Patrol Agent.

Of course the head of the DEA, Eric Holder, denies any accountability. He has gone so far as to lying to congress about medical marijuana raids. Denying any prior knowledge of the organization he runs of selling guns to drug cartels. Eric Holder is more slippery than a greased pig at a fair. What really is funny is his response to these allegations. Basically discounting congressional concerns and saying it is nothing but partisan politics. I'm not a republican or a democrat, I'm just a concerned citizen wanting to know just how far a government agency will go just to keep getting a blank check every year.

The DEA lying with a straight face over their assertion that cannabis has no medicinal value, over the past 40 years has made them feel invulnerable to any other lie they wish to fabricate. Yet they are the government so they automatically get a free pass. So from the top down, from the DEA to local law enforcement, Americans are having its enforcers of justice lie to congress, lie to judges, and imprisoning people everyday.

How are we supposed to trust the police, when it seems like they will do anything to imprison us, and make us criminals over a plant? Like I said, cannabis has never killed anyone, or ruined anyone's life. Only the results of cannabis prohibition has caused that.

Look at the big picture. Our own DEA, ILLEGALLY sold guns to drug cartels. The guns have been linked to over 200 murders. Including a Border Patrol Agent.

Our local law enforcement goes so far as to lying to judges, incarcerating people over a plant.

How are we supposed to be reassured by our police that they are not just out to put us in jail?

Like I said cannabis never killed anyone, it never ruined lives, only the results of it's prohibition has caused that.

can only guess it is over pressure from your bosses to specifically target cannabis users so they can receive Federal Subsidies set aside for local law enforcement for quotas on cannabis arrests. How much is it up to now? A million bucks,... more?

Was it the thrill of taking someones home away from them, and all their other personal possessions so you can turn a quick buck on a sheriff's auction?

Cannabis has never killed anyone, but our law enforcement would have us believe that cannabis users are public enemy number one. Why else would they spend the majority of their time focusing on cannabis arrests?

Look at the big picture. Our own DEA, ILLEGALLY sold guns to drug cartels. The guns have been linked to over 200 murders. Including a Border Patrol Agent.

Our local law enforcement goes so far as to lying to judges, incarcerating people over a plant.

How are we supposed to be reassured by our police that they are not just out to put us in jail?

Like I said cannabis never killed anyone, it never ruined lives, only the results of it's prohibition has caused that.

The question I have to ask is what motivated these Police Officers to lie to a judge, just to set someone up for a cannabis charge? What is motivating them to go so far to violating peoples civil liberties by invading their privacy, based simply on where they shopped?

I can only guess it is over pressure from your bosses to specifically target cannabis users so they can receive Federal Subsidies set aside for local law enforcement for quotas on cannabis arrests. How much is it up to now? A million bucks,... more?

Was it the thrill of taking someones home away from them, and all their other personal possessions so you can turn a quick buck on a sheriff's auction?

Cannabis has never killed anyone, but our law enforcement would have us believe that cannabis users are public enemy number one. Why else would they spend the majority of their time focusing on cannabis arrests?

Look at the big picture. Our own DEA, ILLEGALLY sold guns to drug cartels. The guns have been linked to over 200 murders. Including a Border Patrol Agent.

Our local law enforcement goes so far as to lying to judges, incarcerating people over a plant.

How are we supposed to be reassured by our police that they are not just out to put us in jail?

Like I said cannabis never killed anyone, it never ruined lives, only the results of it's prohibition has caused that.

How cannabis prohibitionist Rep. Frank Wolf, was bought by lobbyist

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:05:00 +0000

Back on May 9th, congress sent a bill to stop the DEA from spending tax money on enforcing federal laws against states who have medical marijuana. The bill was debated heatedly, and was voted against by a majority in congress.

During the debating process, one particular congressman really stood out to me in particular. That was Republican Representative Frank Wolf, of Virgina's 10th District.

Representative Frank Wolf basically stuck to parroting all the talking points of cannabis prohibitionist for the past 70 years, interjecting miscellaneous straw man arguments along the way. He questioned the boundaries of states rights, stating, "If a state said that sex trafficking is okay, would we honor that and say that we are not gonna protect? I would hope not. States in the past have done things that were not good for this country." He also touched on the pill mill problems in Florida, stating "We talk about doctors, the number of doctors that were ripping off people with oxycontin - the number of doctors [that would be] devasting. You could go down to Broward County, in Florida, and go into some of these pain clinics -- There are buses coming down, and planes coming down, to buy it, and doctors are writing prescriptions. So we are going to hide behind it and just say doctors are? The number of doctors that ruin young people on oxycontin. .. that whereby they died, they died! Instead they hide behind a "doctor says" [and] that that means it's okay .."

We might be able to agree that the pain management policies are being abused, but the fact remains that people with legitimate pain are roped into the mix and are being treated like criminals. Many of the people who are traveling by buses and planes to Florida are going there because they are unable to get proper pain management alternatives in their home states, so they are forced to be scrutinized unfairly just to be able to receive treatment.

The comparison of states rights to use cannabis, and the problem with Florida's pill mills only exemplifies the need for states to have other alternatives for treatment.

I personally experienced a close friend go through quite an ordeal with pain management in Florida. She got into a car accident and sought a legal way to help cope with their pain. At first the doctors had trouble locating her injury and they did not want to prescribe pain killers, even though her pain was very real and excruciating. Eventually the doctors were able to pinpoint the problem and finally starting her on a precription of oxycodone.
One of the procedures utilized to locate her pain, in turn, elevated her pain and her prescription was increased. She became fearful of building up a tolerance against the medication - or worse, she feared she may become addicted. Her doctor placated her fears with a proverbial "pat on the head". Within several months, despite addressing these concerns with her doctor, she did end up addicted, and eventually had to find an alternative to the oxycodone. After spending time in drug rehabilitation she is now on methadone - probably for the rest of her life. To this day, her health has been seriously affected as a result of using the only legal way to find relief from her injuries.

Perhaps it's time we search for alternatives?

Medication errors harming millions

As a modern nation we have the responsibility to provide access to the best treatment available. There needs to be more than just highly addictive and expensive pills to provide needed relief for pain. By not giving people the legal choice for an alternative to pain pills when something else is available is wrong.

17 states recognize the medical efficacy of cannabis and they do not suffer the same problems Florida does with it's addiction to pill mills. Why? They have an legal alternative. An alternative that is extremely less addictive, and with substantially less lethal side effects.

Unfortunately, our government put a red X over those 17 states and targeted attacks against the people who voted for the right to be able to use medicinal cannabis, spending billions of dollars, arresting, and seizing assets, of the people providing access to medicinal cannabis.

After watching this debate in congress, I started wondering whether Representative Frank Wolf was influenced by lobbyists, and started doing some in depth research into who has invested in his campaigns since he was elected. What I found honestly was not surprising.

Here is my evidence that Representative Frank Wolf is nothing more than a bought out talking head for cannabis prohibitionist.

5 special interest groups that help keep cannabis illegal

The 5 special interest groups that keep cannabis illegal are: Police Unions, Private Prisons Corporations, Alcohol and Beer Companies, Pharmaceutical Corporations, and Prison Guard Unions.

Representative Frank Wolf has received campaign contributions from at least 6 contributors on the list.

Representative Frank Wolf's full list of donors.

Corporate Prisons:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

Pharmaceutical:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB CO. EMPLOYEE PAC
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION - PAC
PFIZER INC. PAC

Drug Testing:
QUEST DIAGNOSTICS INCORPORATED POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

So you see, this is a prime example of how lobbyists have bought and paid for Representative Frank Wolf. The good news is, he is running for re-election this year.

Running against Representative Frank Wolf is Jeff Barnett. Unfortunately, I have been unable to determine if he is worth endorsing due to the fact I couldn't find any information on his stand regarding current drug policies.

How we won the moral majority over cannabis reform

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Wed, 30 May 2012 19:05:00 +0000

Over the past few years, Americans have increasingly grown in numbers supporting cannabis reform. For the last couple of years it has finally gotten to the point in which the moral majority of Americans approve of cannabis reform.

How did we finally get past Reefer Madness? Our country has spent over a trillion dollars fighting the war on drugs. Much of it spent on propaganda, telling us how bad cannabis is, and yet we are looking past that now.

Seeing a majority of Americans finally speaking out fearlessly against cannabis reform gives me hope. Politically, it is the elephant always in the room. It is a civil rights issue, and a human rights issue complexly combined. It's time has finally come to fruition.

I appreciate all the hard work cannabis activists are doing. They have worked together networking and helping folks understand that cannabis reform is not about just getting high. (Albeit, I'm okay with that too) It is making a difference.

Politicians are no longer afraid to admit they used cannabis. Nowadays, it makes them look hip or something to the younger voters. Politicians who were serious cannabis prohibitionists are starting to get voted out of office.

Take Texas Representative Sylvester Reyes for example, he sat in office representing west Texas for 16 years. He had twice as much campaign money as his challenger, and an endorsement from our President. Yesterday, he got knocked off the November ballot for reelection. (cya!)

His challenger, former El Paso city councilman Beto O'Rourke won the Democratic nomination for Texas' 16th congressional district with just over 50 percent of the vote. Beto O'Rourke ran his campaign primarily focused on drug reform. Unlike Representative Sylvester Reyes, who has cast a blind eye on whatever has been happening on our border, by uncompromisingly supporting the status quo regarding cannabis prohibition.

The votes are starting to come our way.

The moral majority of Americans are seeing first hand the consequences of our war on drugs. They are becoming more educated on all the real benefits that ending cannabis prohibition would bring to our country.

We are tired of seeing our veterans coming home from fighting wars, and not getting all the support they deserve to help them with disabilities and ptsd, by denying veterans access to medicinal cannabis.

We are reaching out to seniors who are a force to be reckoned with in the voting booth, People like Robert Platshorn are making a difference by promoting The Silver Tour. Robert Platshorn is the longest serving inmate in our countries history for a cannabis charge. When he finally got released he became an influential activist who has been working hard to get petitions signed to get medicinal cannabis on the ballot. He is also touring the state of Florida educating seniors who never considered cannabis as an alternative to expensive prescriptions.

How many veterans are going to go out and risk going to jail because they deal with their issues better with the aid of cannabis? Americans who have served their country are wanting alternatives to pharmaceuticals.

Considering the exponential rate of veterans filing for disability and the high rate of suicides, I would only hope our leaders would utilize good science over ideology and rhetoric. Our veterans deserve it, and so do all the other American citizens.

Veterans for Medical Cannabis Access Reply To Response from the Obama Administration

Americans are disappointed in our president, who had he been caught using cannabis when he was younger, he wouldn't be president today. Sure he straightened up, and quit smoking pot. I guess he realized being a black male smoking cannabis, that the odds were he would get busted eventually. Especially since the majority of the people arrested for cannabis are black males.

Since President Obama has been in office almost 3 million people have been arrested for cannabis related crimes. Mostly simple possession.

"The president, when asked why he doesn’t do something positive about medical marijuana, is quoted in Rolling Stone magazine as saying “I can’t nullify congressional law. I can’t ask the Justice Department to say, ‘Ignore completely a federal law that’s on the books."

I hate to say it, but either the President is flat out lying or he is completely ignorant of what he can do with his executive powers. Why is it that a high school drop out with a GED, understands that the president has the power to reschedule cannabis without congressional approval, but my president who is a lawyer who graduated from Harvard does not?
I'm leaning towards lying to the American people...

It becomes blatantly obvious that the people who are against cannabis reform are the ones who stand to lose the most money. We see our elected officials constantly taking money from lobbyist representing, beer and alcohol companies, law enforcement, private prisons, pharmaceutical companies, just to keep cannabis illegal.

Americans are seeing the DEA's self serving desire to protect their jobs by cock blocking earnest attempts to have cannabis rescheduled so medicinal research can be done, and the tons of anecdotal evidence can finally be tested utilizing peer reviewed science.

Americans are disgusted by seeing the DEA selling guns to drug cartels, screwing whores in Bogota, Colombia, to shooting pregnant women fishing in a boat from a helicopter in the Honduras.

So we are becoming more educated. We are seeing past all the misinformation put out there. We are starting to elect politicians who are ready to change our nations drug policies.

We are in the right, and we will prevail!

We are done with this stupid war on drugs.

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Mon, 28 May 2012 21:50:00 +0000

Reason Rally: Politics and Ideology Takes A Backseat For The Advocation Of Science!

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:05:00 +0000

I recently got the chance to go to Washington, DC. for the Reason Rally. The largest secular gathering in the world. It was estimated by the National Park Service during the event that there were approximately over 20,000 non believers in attendance.

The Reason Rally organizers had set up special rates for the event. My wife and I stayed in comfort at the Hilton. The tram to downtown Washington, D.C. was conveniently located across the street.

I went to this event primarily to support the atheist community, and secondly to speak out for the advancement of scientific research, free from politics and ideology.

When President Obama signed the executive order to allow stem cell research, he boldly made this assertion. Now, 3 years later, other than stem cell research, politics and ideology are a side note to scientific openness, and rings as nothing more than hollow political rhetoric.

Why cant our country get serious about utilizing real science by allowing peer reviewed, scientific research, to determine if cannabis has medicinal properties, and quit making criminals out of the people who want to use it for their own personal needs?

It was an honor and a privilege to be in the attendance of so many like minded people, and getting a chance to listen to a line up of such influential speakers.

I made this video, and PZ Myers put it on his net-famous blog Pharyngula!

There were some unforgettable moments that stood out. Such as the young lady, Jessica Ahlquist. She won a lawsuit against the state of Rhode Island, and managed to have a prayer banner taken down in her high school. The end result was, she was threatened and harassed, to the point of needing police protection. Rhode Island state representative Peter G. Palumbo, jumped on the christian bandwagon and dubbed this young high school girl an "evil little thing"
She received a scholarship check from the American Humanist Association for $62,000.00

Jessica Ahlquist Speech

It was a lot of fun watching Tim Minchin drop almost 100 F-bombs in like 20 minutes across the loudspeakers on the National Mall. Supposedly it was a new record!

Fuckin -A

Here are a few more random pictures I took during the event:

James Randi

Tim Minchin

A vision of secular Americans.

Nate Phelps gave up religion when he became an adult. His father ironically is Fred Phelps, pastor/figurehead of the much loathed Westboro Baptist Church.

Cristina Rad aka: ZOMGitsCriss! An infamous Youtube Celeb came all the way from Romania. My wife Tricia, watches her all the time.

Professor Richard Dawkins

Professor PZ Myers

US Drug Policy Is Killing People Every Half Hour In Mexico

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:58:00 +0000

This past week, Mexico's President Philipe Calderon, begrudgingly released details on it's national death toll caused by the United State's war on drugs.
Mexico releases drug war death toll estimate: One killing every half hour

Inexplicably, this has not even been a footnote on the televised news programs. Why is that? Why must so many lives be ignored as this ghoulish statistic grows every day? Why are the governments not avidly discussing different proposals on their policies to turn this around?

I don't think that many people who are smoking cannabis imported from Mexico realize that they are contributing to the deaths of so many people. I kind of equate it to the meat industry. If people actually saw what the process entailed, or had to take some part of the slaughter process, their would probably be less people eating meat. We have plausible deny ability once it is grilled and presented nicely on our plates. The same goes for Mexican cannabis. We only see it in a plastic bag, all fluffed up and smelling good.

We have no empathy for the cows and chickens no more than we have for the people who die in the war on drugs. So, we blindly consume to satiate our voracious appetites.

A serious debate needs to happen on our countries drug policies. How many more people need to die or go to prison over the cannabis plant? Unfortunately most people who go to prison in the United States for cannabis possession are non violent offenders, compared to what is happening in Mexico.

The United States policy of focusing on it's domestic growers, and simple consumers may be good for law enforcement financially, but it does not have any far reaching affect on the people who kill to import cannabis into the United States.

How much safer is our country for arresting Willy Nelson and Snoop Dog? All that managed to do is bring more awareness to the simple fact that our nation's drug policies are not working, and that people are wanting a change in direction. Willie Nelson's Tea Pot Party is a good example of this. Because of his arrest a national movement was created focusing on only electing political candidates who were more inclined to be cannabis friendly.

Our current policies on the war on drugs are not harm reduction policies. They are doing more harm, and we need to take a serious look at how our country should be leading the way in actually creating a real harm reduction policy.

Things like this need to be put on our national agenda and discussed:

Ending Federal subsidies to law enforcement for primarily focusing on cannabis convictions, instead of focusing on more violent crimes affecting our neighborhoods.
Making drug addiction a health care issue instead of a criminal issue.
Rescheduling cannabis so legitimate research can be conducted on it's medicinal properties, and ending conflicts between the Federal Government and states rights.
Taking away 70% of drug cartels income by ending demand for illegally imported cannabis.
Looking at the big financial picture and discussing all the jobs that could potentially be created by allowing farmers to grow hemp for ethanol, hempcrete, hemp resins, nutritional supplements, clothing, etc.

A serious discussion is needed now. How many more people have to die needlessly to support a failed policy?

A good step in the right direction is by convincing our politicians to endorse the call of the Global Commission on Drug Policy to recognize the failure of current policy and to embark on a study of evidence based alternatives.

http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/Report

Why are harm reduction policies against marijuana doing more harm than good

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:35:00 +0000

The war on drugs is a failure. President Obama even stated this when he was campaigning to be president. In the past year the Federal Government has accelerated their agenda against medical marijuana, despite assurances 3 years ago that medical marijuana policies would be considered a states rights issue.

Even dispensaries who have complied with state laws have been attacked by the Federal Government by utilizing the IRS, going after banks who work with marijuana dispensaries, to sending letters to landlords of property in which a dispensary is located threatening to seize their property if they continue to rent out their property to dispensary operators.

The goal of the dispensaries in the 15 states that medical marijuana is legal is to provide a safe clean location where someone can purchase medical marijuana without having to deal with the black market. That is harm reduction.

Somewhere along the way in the name of harm reduction, we have seen a trend which has taken it hostage by the Dept. of Justice.

For example when you have a paramilitary supplied SWAT Team busting down your door and shooting unarmed civilians suspected of possessing marijuana. The balance of harm reduction is thrown out the window, and it causes resentment against the police.

Pablo Escobar is not going to be behind 99% of the doors that deals marijuana in suburban America. It is most likely going to be someone who sells a little bit to their friends so they can afford to have some for themselves.

Pulling up to houses in armored vehicles with semi automatic assault weapons and flash bang grenades is a good way to induce fear in the American public who do decide they are going to use marijuana, but it is not doing anything towards harm reduction because people are still going to use it no matter how afraid they want the people to be.

More harm is done by over zealous prohibitionist than has ever been done by a marijuana plant.
American's are tired of seeing dirty cops planting marijuana on innocent civilians, selling guns to drug cartels, receiving billions of dollars to incarcerate more people than any other country, getting kick backs for seizing property, and using fear as a tool to make us stop using a plant.

If harm reduction was the main priority for law enforcement they would be doing the right thing by making marijuana a health issue instead of a crime issue. If they would divert the billions of dollars they receive every year and give it to health professionals there would be substantially less harm for American citizens.

To accomplish harm reduction the Dept. of Justice needs to rethink their strategy and realize that fear is not the way to go. They tried it and it has not worked, people will continue to use marijuana despite their questionable motivations which comes across as fascist and constitutionally challenging.

Unlike a lot of the younger generation, I still remember what it was like during the cold war against the Soviet Union. I remember all the propaganda against the communist's trying to control every facet of a persons life and I even volunteered in the Navy to stand up against that type of oppression from spreading across the globe and affecting other countries. It seems like nowadays I have to fight the same oppressive ideology in my own backyard.

People who use cannabis in the U.S. is in the millions, and they are being treated similarly to some of the same Gestapo tactics used to round up the Jews in WWII. We are being treated like second class citizens over the use of a plant.

The majority of American citizens who use cannabis want to be law abiding citizens. We want to see our streets safer, we want to see violent crime go down, but we are not the problem, and we do not deserve to have the brunt of police policies pushing us into oppression over a marijuana plant. This is not in any way "harm reduction."

Why The Dept. of Justice Needs To Clean House and Reverse it's Policy On Marijuana

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:56:00 +0000

The Department of Justice (DoJ) has become an entity unto itself, and when I finally saw the big picture and realized this, I have to be honest, I actually felt frightened momentarily. (I even took a break from writing for a month to sort things out.) It was a realization that their hunger for power supersedes integrity and true lawfulness.

I do not understand the logic that it is ok to sell guns to cartels, and then turn around and say that medical marijuana patients do not have the same rights as everyone else who owns a gun to protect their family.

How responsible is it for the (DoJ) to arm cartels, when tens of thousands of people a year are dying violent deaths on our borders? Without even getting consent from the Mexican government? Is their going to be accountability from within the (DoJ) and our government now to compensate any death on the border if it is found out that it was by one of the guns our government illegally sold the to cartels?

How about all the money that was made selling those guns to drug cartels in Mexico, go to the victims of the families who end up dying from them? I am sure they could use the blood money the (DoJ) got paid for them.

I wanted to understand how the (DoJ) can decidedly proliferate a justification to treating millions of Americans like second class citizens over a plant. By maintaining the position that marijuana has no medicinal benefits. Despite the fact that 16 states (so far) have recognized it's medicinal benefits, doctors, accredited scientific organizations, and thousands of years of it being used medicinally, the (DoJ) refuses to acknowledge that marijuana has any medicinal benefits.

They are standing in the way of rescheduling a plant that has so much potential, for the sake of power and greed. Most people don't know it but we are paying them billions of dollars a year to fuck us in the ass instead of doing the right thing.

Selling guns illegally to drug cartels, only proves that they are proliferating the problem instead of truly trying to fix it.

I hope others realize the potential problems we have in this side of our government. The side that is supposed to be protecting us being compromised by keeping cannabis illegal. $$$$$$$/POWER
Our own Department of Justice.

The world will not end if marijuana prohibition ended tomorrow. I would like to think if that happened they're would be new jobs, less people in prison, and many cures that can potentially be discovered for people who need it.

Whatever is motivating the (DoJ) to oppress the people they are paid to protect, I hope they realize that no matter how much we want to respect them for doing a good job, it is hard to trust them when they have such a tarnished image.

In closing my final thought is this.
If the (DoJ) is holding back on rescheduling marijuana for money and power, they should be held accountable for committing treason against the American people. What good reason do they have to stand in the way of cancer research, and new jobs in our shitty economy?

Realizing that the (DoJ) is so big and powerful an entity unto itself backed by billions of dollars, and is supposed to protect me is potentially committing treason against the American people has really gotten me fearful.

I hope the (DoJ) would just do the right thing and just reschedule marijuana, but they sure don't have a good track record for doing the right thing lately.

Marijuana Legalization "It's the economy stupid"

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:54:00 +0000

Quick wiki reference of the origination of the term:

"It's the economy, stupid" was a phrase in American politics widely used during Bill Clinton's successful 1992 presidential campaign against George H. W. Bush. For a time, Bush was considered unbeatable because of foreign policy developments such as the end of the Cold War and the Persian Gulf War. The phrase, made popular by Clinton campaign strategist James Carville, refers to the notion that Clinton was a better choice because Bush had not adequately addressed the economy, which had recently undergone a recession.

Marijuana Legalization "It's the economy stupid" Should be what politicians need to be hearing during these tough financial times. I am not saying it would fix the problem completely, but considering cannabis/hemp is such a valuable commodity, it should finally get its proper respect and be treated like it is, only legally.

How much money could our country generate by cannabis/hemp being legal is beyond my pay grade. I can just imagine if farmers were left alone to grow in peace, patients could get what they want for their body. There would be new companies making oils, fabrics, food, construction, fabrication, pharmaceuticals, etc. Gee that kinda sounds like a lot of new jobs to me. (Looks around).....

What is it going to take to get the people in office to realize they are hurting our country by ignoring cannabis/hemp during these tough times. I can almost hear our first president, George Washington, screaming from within his sacred tomb. It was there for us when we needed it in the past, and our country would be better off if we did it again.

I have given up on politicians empty promises. The Democrats have basically maintained the status quo on marijuana prohibition, I'm a liberal, so I would rather chew off my fingers than vote for a Republican. So my vote is essentially useless in the distant future. I think the only way to finally get this resolved once and for all is in the courts.

That's why I am working so hard to make a difference. Once I learned how science can be utilized in a court of law to potentially get marijuana possession charges dismissed instead of taking a plea deal, I made it a personal mission to educate as many people who are willing to listen as I possibly can, and not only that provide the resources, expert witnesses, and lawyers, to back it up.

I was fortunate in the fact that I have had the opportunity to learn about the science aspect more indepth than a couple of the best people in the field of forensic identification, and testing procedures. Dr. Fred Whitehurst, and John Kelly.

Without their input and insight I would of never made Beat Marijuana Charges.com

Once people quit taking the plea deal, and the court costs start going up, because people take them to task of proving the evidence. It no longer becomes such an easy mark for money, for coffers in the law enforcement/prison industry.

I'd rather my money went to Joe the Farmer.

Marijuana Legalization, It's the economy stupid.

North Carolina Residents Look To 2013 Now For Medical Cannabis Reform

noreply@blogger.com (Guy Petersen Jr aka Killer Bud) — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:15:00 +0000

In North Carolina, the deadline has come and passed officially for any hope of residents of the state to be able to legally use cannabis medicinally. North Carolina's House Bill 577 was not given any priority, and did not get approved.

It is no mystery that the reason why so many refuse to take the time and speak out again, and again, on this important issue is because of fear. It is illegal, and to speak out against it makes you a target for scrutiny. Regardless of that, even if it is just a few of us that are speaking out, our voices are not alone, we will never give up hope that one day we can use our medicine without fearing persecution.

It was affirming to hear an open minded politician (on this subject) stating publicly.

"I don't care whether you are a Democrat or a Republican this is not a partisan issue, it's a bipartisan issue, it's a human rights issue, it is a compassionate treatment issue, it is something that all of us regardless of our political party or registration, can embrace, work together on, and change the policy. Not only in North Carolina, but in this country."
(Rep. D) Kelly Alexander (Mecklenburg District, NC)

It is kind of nice hearing that type of attitude, and we just need to get more people who are thinking like him in office.

For example, Mitt Romney.... He stopped to talk to a young man in a wheelchair, and by listening to the dialogue and watching the video, you will see someone who wants to maintain the status quo.

According to recent polls by CNN Mitt Romney At Top of GOP Field.

I really want to see our country get past this compassionate use issue, and reschedule cannabis on the Federal level, so states can take care of it's residents. Why are so many people so quick to get behind someone who fundamentally goes against what you agree with?

As an Independent voter, I get the luxury of simply voting for who I think would be the best man for the job, (or do the least damage) I could never simply vote along a certain political parties line. I know we could find someone more open minded, and qualified, other than someone like.... Mitt Romney?

As an Independent, I am considered a swing vote, and since there are a lot of us out there, our swing vote can make or break an election for a candidate.

We, are the swing voters who use cannabis to help with our pain, our stress,.. are a huge part of the population, and we are always at risk of facing imprisonment. In our own country we are treated like second class citizens, fortunately the world is coming around to a different way of thinking regarding whether drugs should be a health and rehabilitative issue, instead of a law enforcement issue.

The Global Commission On Drug Policy was released this month. In it's opening statement it declares: "The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world. Fifty years after the initiation of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, and 40 years after President Nixon launched the US government’s war on drugs, fundamental reforms in national and global drug control policies are urgently needed."

But for some reason our Federal Government disagrees...

So next years budget proposal for fighting the war on drugs is estimated to be around 26 billion we have already spent over a trillion dollars, and then unconvincingly stating that drug use has gone down, and the war should continue.

193 Billion usd cost on war on drugs 2007

I hope people realize that if they are not paying attention to the policies of the politicians they are voting for to represent them, then this cycle of being ignored will continue. When they want your vote the most, put them to the task and call them out on this issue, and if they are against it, find out why they are. Then turn around and ask yourself why you would support them on election day.

The activists that show up, and openly speak out on the bills that matter to us, are being ignored. More support is needed to change public opinion, especially in the South East of the country. Not one state in the South East has budged.

In North Carolina, the next chance for reform will be in 2013. There is a big election between now and then, and by the time they even remotely consider it again, billions of dollars will of been wasted, and millions of lives will be affected. That sure is a big elephant in the room to just ignore