As of now.

Ask yourself, how well do you know him ? His advocacies ? What issues are he passionate about ? Like me, I suspect that most people would draw a blank when asked about Noynoy Aquino, apart from the fact that he is the only son of Ninoy and Cory Aquino.

Noynoy himself, and his handlers, have not been shy about playing the Ninoy-Cory card. Says Liberal Party 2010 campaign manager Florencio “Butch” Abad: “Senator Aquino will not turn his back on the legacy of his parents”. In a press conference prior to his going on a weekend retreat do seek divine guidance for his political plans, Noynoy said “yes” when asked if he would carry on the fight started by his parents. What this “fight” is all about in concrete terms, he does not say although he can be rather smug about his legacy. Says he: “We enjoy popular support all these years because we reflect the interest of freedom-loving Filipinos.”

But if his main selling point is his parentage, wouldn’t we be better off with Kris Aquino, who is undoubtedly more popular and has lived a more drama-filled life than her bland and balding brother ? It would certainly make for a more interesting campaign, at the very least.

To be sure, Noynoy can come up with the usual sound bites, throwing around time-worn phrases like “we are all in this together” and calling for “sacrifice”. But behind all these motherhood statements is a cardboard man totally lacking in substance. Worse, he may not be above resorting to cheap political gimmickry ( as alleged by Malacanang but for once I agree with Gary Olivar on this). In Noynoy’s case case, following to the letter a Cory template successfully utilized during the 1986 snap elections. As pointed out by Dr. Winnie Monsod, no friend of this blighted administration:

It was clear to everyone that Noynoy wanted to make the run for the presidency. So why the announcement that Aquino was to go on retreat to help him decide on whether he should make that run?

If the decision is already made—and it must have been—the retreat has to be for the purpose of asking God’s blessing on his candidacy—so why not just so state?

Is it because Noynoy’s handlers want to milk the Cory magic and show that Noynoy is doing the same thing that Cory did—and not only that—but also time his “decision” to be made on the 40th day after Cory’s death? If that is the case, shame on them all. Because that not only reflects the cynicism of the ultimate, exploitative “trapo,” it is also a disservice to Cory’s memory, and all that she stood for, as well. Cory was truly a reluctant candidate, and she agonized and prayed before finally accepting the mantle. What is more, there was not a single, insincere, manipulative bone in her body.

Anyone who wants to assume the mantle of leadership and selflessness similar to that of Ninoy and Cory better make sure that it is deserved, and earned. It is not something that can be claimed merely because the same blood runs in one’s veins. Rather, it is a matter of character.

I believe we have to reserve judgment on Noynoy until he can flesh out a program of government which would meet our people’s aspirations for honest and just governance. And show us that there is something behind that pleasant demeanor other than tired platitudes and promises. As Tony Meloto reminds us yet again, it is our national tragedy that we are “always looking for somebody to pin all our hopes on and also to blame when these hopes are not realized.” We would be doing ourselves and Noynoy a favor if we do not prematurely hoist upon him the burden of being our savior.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Eased out as headline news in most parts of the world, including the Philippines, by the death of Michael Jackson is the battle with colon cancer of former president Cory Aquino. Good thing too. She confounded most participants of the aborted deathwatch by getting well, at least for now. The media had to content itself with covering the many “get-well Tita Cory” activities in the wake of her reported death. Which was of course greatly exaggerated.

Who doesn’t want to wish her well and a speedy recovery ? Everyone it seems wants her to get back on her feet, the icon of feisty political courage, except Cory herself. She just wants to die, and join Ninoy in the Great Rally in the sky. After having given so much of herself to God, country and the cause of democracy, why not give her this one last wish and let her die with dignity and grace ? Instead, there’s a media circus outside the Makati Med and environs, where she was expected to breath her last.

She doesn’t deserve this. She was a good president and she was a bad president, but on the balance she was the most we could hope for at that historical juncture and she did her best. As Raul Pangalangan points out, and which we all know instinctively, the transition from the brutal Marcos dictatorship wouldn’t have been possible without a Cory who ensured a peaceful handover of power at the end of her term and who didn’t ambition to lift term limits. Which is a lot more than can be said of Gloria Arroyo. While the anxiety of the loss of so great a symbol at this critical time is understandable, we should as a nation be able to let her go. There will be opportunity enough for eulogies, weeping and the wearing of sackcloth and ashes after she finally croaks (which won’t be long now, given the course of her illness). In the meantime, give her time and space with her family and some close friends. Like most of us, she just has to tie up a few loose ends before she says good bye.

We should have the decency to allow her the solitude and privacy she has been praying for. And resist the urge to make her the focal point of so much cheap sentimentality, which only plays into the hand of those politicos who want to be associated with Cory to advance their own agendas for 2010.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Butch Dalisay wrote a post a week or so ago about his not being a fan of the rampant social networking on the web. What a relief. I thought I was the only cranky old man around. And while I do have Facebook account, it was only at the insistent prodding of those near and dear to me. I hardly visit my Facebook page and I’m afraid I may come across as cold and distant to my many well-meaning friends who have poked me and keep sending me this and that invitation to join a cause. It seems I don’t respond well to being nudged, whether electronically or physically, and tend to keep my distance.

Don’t get me wrong. I do appreciate what an amazing platform for connectivity Facebook and its ilk are. People I haven’t seen or heard from in decades are now my Facebook buddies. And I know why it’s such a hit for us Pinoys. It’s rooted deep in our national psyche, the need to be part of a community and to interact constantly.

But a good friend has observed that I can be antisocial. He may be right to some extent. I can be misanthropic. Or I may just be a very reserved person. Shy even.

I don’t chat online. There are times when I don’t even answer my email unless they’re work-related. I neglect my blog and don’t respond to comments, which I’m told a good blogger should always do. I log out of the internet for weeks at a time. Which, at this time and age, makes me a rather odd duck.

My problem is the whole idea that we seem to be expected to now establish “relationships” with everyone we come across. Not in the romantic sense but in the marketing sense. We have to sell our online and offline personas and to do this we have to practice “relationship marketing” . But like Butch, my friends are the ones I enjoy libations with, argue passionately about everything and nothing and who I may not be in touch with for months (even years) at a time but who won’t mind and will embrace me just as warmly the next time we meet. Because “ things get too busy or life yanks us in unexpected directions”. And these relationships are built over time. It’s a process that can’t be rushed, like the aging of fine wine.

Or maybe I’m only trying to justify my crabbiness. In any case, I’m not about metamorphose from a worm to a social butterfly anytime soon.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Chances are the last song you would have heard as you read this and which is still going around in your head is “Thriller”. There’s no escaping Michael Jackson’s music everywhere you went this past week, even in elevators and Starbucks.

Tuesday , July 7, will be Michael Jackson’s memorial service at the Staples Center in Los Angeles and more than 1.6 million fans worldwide registered for tickets to the event over the two-day registration period that ended yesterday, not a few from the country. Random names from the registrants will be drawn electronically and the lucky few will know by Sunday evening (Monday morning in Manila). Only 11,000 tickets will be given out for the Tuesday service while another 6,500 tickets will be given away for the Nokia Theater overflow section next door. Anyone from the Philippines lucky enough to be picked will have to fly off to L.A. within a few hours of being informed to make it to Tuesday’s affair. One will have to head for the venue immediately after landing at LAX. My bags are packed and ready.

This is possibly the biggest memorial service for a non-political or religious personage in history. It will be the first truly global event in this age of online streaming and social networking. Every fan who has access to the internet will be a participant.

Nothing is too big or flamboyant for the King of Pop, even in death. And it looks like it’s going to be a long goodbye, as he or at least his image and music, won’t being going away anytime soon. In fact, he’s proving to be a bigger draw in death than during the past decade or so of his life. Swept under the rug for the time being are the charges of pedophilia and other excesses which led to his downward slide. He was a phenomenal talent, and this is what people chose to remember now that he’s gone.

Of course, he can’t escape the lurid and just plain weird as his post-mortem drama unfolds . From Olivia Munn’s blog:

They say the memorial is more of a concert with guest speakers, music, video screens inside and out and Michael Jackson’s body hanging from the rafters like a pinata!…. okay, that last part isn’t happening. But, they never said it wouldn’t happen…. so technically, they could be hanging MJ’s body from the ceiling with an awesome light show. Yeah- that sounds like an awesome rumor- let’s go with that.

Of course it won’t happen. Will it ?

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

People are saying about the sad and sudden passing of Michael Jackson, the King of Pop, the same thing they said about Elvis: good career move. It’s a bit uncharitable but not entirely inaccurate. He was (and is, in death) a global star but his career had been on a downward spiral for years. Now he’s back on top of the charts.

And given the cult-like veneration given him by some, expect “Michael sightings” to happen a lot in the coming years. He didn’t really die, he was abducted by aliens.

In any case, he has joined the pantheon of stars who tragically bid adieu before their time, a line which stretches back to Marilyn Monroe to Rudolph Valentino and beyond.

Some clear lessons we can pick up from his eventful but unhappy life:

1. Pay attention to your finances – You can be the biggest draw in the world, and earn hundreds of millions, even billions of dollars, but if your expenses outstrip your earnings, you’re in trouble. I was again reminded of this universally-known but much ignored truism in a talk by personal financial adviser Randell Tiongson yesterday. Mr. Jackson’s financial woes certainly contributed to his burdens in later years.

2. Confront Your Demons – or they might just kill you. You don’t have to wrestle with them on a daily basis but should honestly acknowledge them at some point. They have a nasty way of biting you in the butt when you’re not looking, like a pack of rabid dogs. Michael Jackson had big issues. About childhood abuse at the hands of his father, his obvious ambivalence about his race and sexuality and God knows what else. But he didn’t seem to want to undertake the hard legwork of bringing them to light and possibly forging an uneasy truce. Instead he went on Oprah. Which is not the same thing. If necessary, seek professional help.

3. Lighten Up – and I don’t mean dermatologically. Despite his much ballyhooed child-like character, I think he took himself and his public persona much too seriously. Which may have led to the cosmetic surgery. And the drugs. A little humor at the expense of his so-called showbiz image would have lifted the fog somewhat and given him a wider view of his horizons. As economist John Maynard Keynes famously said, in the long run we are all dead. No need to rush the process.

Of course, I can easily spew out such advice, not having known the pain of being Michael Jackson. But I sincerely pray that he finds in death the peace that eluded him in life.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Inevitably billed as a “David vs. Goliath” fight by the media, the announcement of sociology professor Randy David that he would run against Gloria Arroyo should she decide to grab the congressional seat for the 2nd district of Pampanga did not come as a complete surprise to those who know him. This David is no pushover. Soft-spoken, intellectual and unassuming, but definitely not low profile, Prof. David had been a television personality for seventeen years, as a host of a number of well-received public affairs talk shows. He is also a long-time columnist of the Inquirer. Thus, he is comfortable being in the public eye. Neither is he a stranger to controversy, having been active in progressive political circles for decades. He was arrested in 2006 during the series of demonstrations against President Arroyo at the time of the 20th anniversary of the people power revolt when GMA declared a state of national emergency in the face of rising protests against her corrupt government.

I have known him for more than three decades, since my freshman year in college when we were fortunate enough to have him as our Sociology 11 prof. He has a knack for bringing home lessons about Philippine society using methods beyond the classroom. I remember his taking us to the National Mental Hospital, as a way of exposing his young and mostly sheltered wards to another aspect of Philippine reality which we could confront and change in a positive way, if we chose to. He was an intense teacher, but he never forced his views on us. It was the height of martial law, but his passion for ideas and political exchange was palpable and contagious. We’ve had a few opportunities to interact since then. And while I am not one of his many intimates, we are close enough to be on a first-name basis when we occasionally bump into each other. I was therefore elated when I heard on the radio that he would enter the realm of traditional politics for the first , and possibly last, time if GMA runs for Congress as a way of holding on to power. By a twist of fate, both she and Randy come from the same congressional district.

Randy David will have more than an even chance of trumping Arroyo on what she believes is her home turf. Consider the following:

1. Randy David is the Anti-Arroyo- Randy David is the perfect foil for the discredited GMA. An academic all his life, even while he had a busy second career as a talk-show host, he is perceived, rightfully, as an honest and right-minded man who only wants to do his duty as a citizen, which is to do everything he can to arrest the destruction of our democratic institutions. He has none of the political baggage of the traditional politician, although ironically Randy’s late father was a close friend and political party-mate of GMA’s father. Should he run, David will personify the principled new politics which has found fertile ground in Pampanga. He is everything Arroyo is not: moral, upright and untainted by the brand of patronage politics practiced by Arroyo.

2. Randy David has (or will soon have) the network and resources to win – The David clan is widely respected and known throughout Pampanga. Family counts for a lot in local politics. More importantly, should GMA adopt the tactic of being the congressional candidate prior to the predicted shift to a parliamentary system (and from there to the prime ministership) the focus of next year’s national election would be the 2nd district of Pampanga. Civil society and all other forces opposed to Arroyo’s politics as usual would find it easier to pool their resources and bring them to bear on a much smaller political arena. Already, the Liberal Party of presidential candidate Mar Roxas has offered to make Randy their official candidate in the district. The LP was the party of the fathers of both GMA and David. The United Opposition (UNO) has also expressed support for him. The David campaign will be flooded with funds and volunteers while the congressional tussle itself be closely monitored by local and international election watchdogs. This will make it all the harder, although not impossible, for GMA to cheat.

3. The voters of Pampanga are unpredictable – as shown by their election of cleric-on-leave Gov. Ed Panlilio, who defied the money and muscle of the Arroyo-anointed candidate to sweep the 2007 Pampanga gubernatorial polls.

David is a reluctant candidate and is the first to admit that this undertaking is quixotic. But he has all the qualities of a man who, in the words of sociologist Max Weber, can “put his hand on the wheel of history”. As enumerated by Weber, Randy David reveals the three pre-eminent qualities that are decisive for the politician: passion, responsibility and sense of proportion. The ideal politician approaches politics not as a playground for his ego, but as a field in which he seeks to achieve a cause much larger than himself. He takes responsibility for actions. And he always maintains a objective perspective, of his ultimately minor role in the larger scheme of things.

Prof. David wrote about this many years ago and said:

This notion of the political vocation restores to politics the dignity it has lost in many societies. At the same time, it is a reminder of the arduous tasks that await those who are “called” to it. Because of my exposure in media, people often ask me if I have any plans of entering (traditional) politics. My answer has always been, following Weber’s criteria, that I feel I do not have the passion for it.

But times have changed, and Randy apparently now realizes that passion, that overwrought and overrated word, is not absolutely necessary for the effective exercise of leadership. And for heroism. One merely needs to have a clear sense of duty and honor.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Cartoon from The New Yorker.
———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Two sides of the same coin. There are some people who can grieve calmly and with equanimity. Unfortunately, I am not such a person. I lash out. I turn my rage inward. I isolate.

I look for answers when I know there are none. It’s like banging one’s head against a concrete wall. Again and again and again.

I know it sounds melodramatic but there it is.

It’s somewhat comforting to know that I’m not alone and that this is a fairly common experience. Anger is one of the stages of grieving, per Kubler-Ross. But sometimes I can’t get beyond it. Like today. And the past few days.

Megan O’Rourke’s series of articles on the grieving process in Slate has been a great help. Like her, I sometimes feel like biting people’s heads off.

I came across an unusual and really wonderful short story in the New Yorker, “A Tiny Feast” by Chris Adrian which made me cry.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

Senators Enrile and Pimentel threw vicious personal barbs at each other yesterday at the Senate floor, getting one another’s goat by unseemly name-calling. I think Pimentel got the better of the mud-slinging as he touched a raw nerve by calling Enrile the principal administrator of Marcos’ martial law. Enrile admitted to faking his own ambush in order to provide an additional excuse for the imposition of dictatorial rule. He also had Pimentel arrested four times during his incumbency as Marcos’ right-hand man. Mere statements of fact, to be sure, but which cut deep as Mr. Enrile has tried hard to live down his past as a Marcos’ main enforcer.

Enrile could not respond in kind, and resorted to lame personal insults, calling Pimentel a “hypocrite” and a “spoiled brat” and said that he “will not waste a bullet on him”, thus reinforcing Enrile’s deserved reputation as a trigger-happy hothead. Na-pikon si JPE. In response to Enrile’s calling him a coward, Pimentel replied:

As Mr. Enrile knows –he ordered my arrest four times — did I run away?

The fracas stemmed from Pimentel’s having filed a petition before the Supreme Court last week to stop the investigation of the ethics complaint against Senator Manny Villar.

Enrile resigned the chairmanship of the Senate Committee of the Whole in a snit but his resignation was refused by his colleagues.

Why are parliamentary insults more challenging and intense than mere accusations and criticism ? Because they allow for the emotional force of the message to exceed its rational force and seriously undermine the addressee’s image, position and authority, according to the book Language and Ideology.

And distasteful as it may seem to observers, such conduct among parliamentarians has a long and revered history. Winston Churchill was a master of the genre. He once said of three-time British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin: “I wish Stanley Baldwin no ill, but it would have been much better if he had never lived”. Again of Baldwin: “He occasionally stumbled over the truth, but hastily picked himself up and hurried on as if nothing had happened.”

Enrile and Pimentel are in good company, even if they are light years away from matching Churchill’s wit.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?

To extricate oneself from a sticky situation, suicide is literally the last resort. A person in full possession of all his faculties would naturally hesitate to resort to what has been called a permanent solution to a temporary problem. But there are people and cultures who look upon self-annihilation as a viable option in order to save some vestige of one’s honor. The Japanese are of course well-known for this. Seppuku or ritual suicide is a means not only of recovering some terminal self-respect and atoning for one’s misdeeds. It can also be aimed at shaming a morally bankrupt system to change. This is what spurred Buddhist monks to immolate themselves publicly and dramatically during the Vietnam war. Japanese novelist and ultra-nationalist Yukio Mishima thought he could do this too but only succeeded in killing himself.

Not that the Japanese are exceptional in this. The custom of falling on one’s sword dates back to ancient times. Plutarch records such a death in The Life of Brutus:

Then giving each of them his right hand, with a countenance full of pleasure, he said, that he found an infinite satisfaction in this, that none of his friends had been false to him; that as for fortune, he was angry with that only for his country’s sake; xxx and, taking hold of the hilt of his sword and directing it with both his hands, he fell upon it, and killed himself.

Thus, the suicide of former South Korean President and blogger Roh Moo Hyun, who leapt to his death from a hill behind his house was, although shocking, not totally unexpected. And perfectly understandable. He was a man of principle and was shamed that he should be under investigation for a bribery allegation involving U.S.$ 6 million. Roh’s suicide note said his health was poor and that “nothing is left in my life but to be a burden to others.” He faced death with equanimity and class, writing:

Don’t be too sad. Aren’t life and death both a piece of nature? Don’t be sorry. Don’t blame anyone. It is fate.

Nothing had yet been proven and it was likely he could have cleared himself, the money having been received by relatives and subalterns. Yet the fact that he was under suspicion caused him intolerable humiliation.

And he killed himself for a sum which is paltry by the standards of the Arroyo administration. In one deal alone for example, like the fertilizer fund scam, the Arroyo government squandered three times that amount. Yet no one shows any mortification within the Philippine government, least of all President Arroyo. It’s simply business as usual at the Palace. It’s a shame we don’t have a tradition of honorable self-destruction, one more remnant of the religious beliefs foisted on us by our colonial past . By a simple act like that of Roh, our country could be saved from further suffering and grief.

———

Have you read my other popular articles like Libel on the Internet under Philippine Laws (Part 1), Libel on the Internet under Philippine Law (Part 2) or on Freedom of Expression?