Redskins Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//242007-12-05T19:43:56ZMovable Type 3.33Redskins Chat today at 2 p.m.tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.30252007-12-05T18:22:01Z2007-12-05T19:43:56ZHey everybody. I'm back for our first chat since we did one at midseason when the Redskins were 5-3 and in position to claim an NFC wild card spot. Obviously, a lot has happened since, including Sean Taylor's killing and...twtsports
From Larry in Silver Spring:
Will tomorrow night's game be as emotional as Sunday's, or do you think everyone's ready to move on and focus on football?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I do think the focus will be on football for the Redskins. The vibe around the team yesterday was competely different than it was last week after Taylor's death. When you mention emotion, it's surprising that the Redskins didn't come out with more fire or passion -- they were completing flat. Maybe attending the funeral will give some guys a sense of closure and they can be focused on the current task -- saving their season with a win over the equally desperate 5-7 Bears.
From Jeff G. in Arlington:
I know how close Clinton Portis was with Sean Taylor, and you can see how hard he's taken Sean's death. Do you think it will have any lasting effect on his on-field performance? Clinton obviously struggled against the Bills -- was that an aberration, or cause for concern?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I think Portis bounces back with a good game tomorrow night. He had 25 carries for just 50 yards against the Bills but that was a product of Buffalo playing both safeties near the line of scrimmage and having a solid run defense. Portis didn't exactly have a lot of running room.
From Shalin:
I was wondering if Clinton Portis is going to play tomorrow? There was mention that he hurt his ankle / knee on Sunday against the Bills? Just wondering if Betts will get a look since it is a short healing week for CP?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I expect Portis to play. He told me in the locker room yesterday that he felt pretty good for a Tuesday. Betts is a possiblity to get some more work if Portis' injuries give him trouble early in the game.
From Barry in Reston:
How concerning was Joe Gibbs' performance on Sunday with the timeouts and 10-men-on-the-field?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Very concerning. On the 10-men tribute, Gibbs should have been kept in the loop on that and said as much yesterday. I can't really blame Joe on that one. On the rule deal -- can't call consecutive timeouts to freeze the kicker -- that's a big-time issue. It probably didn't alter the game, Rian Lindell had just connected from 51 yards before the first timeout was called. But there has to be somebody on that staff to get in Joe's ear and tell him/remind him of the rules. In his current game-day role, Gibbs has few duties: Timeouts, replay challenges and fourth-down decisions. He has to be sharper.
From Paul in Arlington:
Is this it for Coach Joe? I'm torn between loyalty to the guy, seeing
him in an obviously tough situation and also wanting him kicked out
to the curb? What are your thoughts?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Tough to say. He won't be kicked to the curb, that's for sure. The decision undoubtedly will be his and his alone. The Danny won't fire him or even send him upstairs to the front office for a year. Last Sunday's game and the timeout fiasco should force Joe to ask himself this question; How much have some of my game-day decisions hurt the cause this year? There is plenty of evidence to suggest it has.
From Bill in Raleigh, N.C.:
So if Joe Gibbs is gone after the year, who's up for that spot? Does
Gregg Williams have any competition?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I think Williams is the leader right now for the post unless The Danny wants to make some noise and blow up the entire operation (save for the front office and VInny, of course). If Williams gets the job, the questions are then: A) Does Al Saunders stay? B) How does Williams co-exist with a front office that likes to get older players?
Ryan O'Halloran:
That's all the questions for today. I'll be back later in the month to wrap things up with a chat.
]]>
Redskins Midseason Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.25802007-11-06T18:20:24Z2007-11-06T19:47:24ZGreetings from Redskin Park. The team returns to work tomorrow to get ready for Sunday's key NFC East game against the Philadelphia Eagles. Our midseason package -- grades, five plays of the first half -- will run in Wednesday's paper....twtsports
From SkinsLover in D.C.:
Why do we not spread teams out inside the 5-yard line and then run the ball instead of always going into a jumbo package?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Sounds like somebody listened to Doc Walker's radio interview with Redskins QB Jason Campbell this morning at SportsTalk 980. Walker's contention, I believe, is that the Redskins should spread the field near the goal-line and then run up the middle, particularly on draw plays. That worked a few times outside the 20-yard line on Sunday. According to my chart, the Redskins had five plays inside the Jets' 10-yard line. They did 2-WR/2-RB on the first three plays. They had 1-WR/2-RB on a first-and-goal play from the 9. And on first-and-goal from the 1, they had their 'Jumbo' -- 2 RB-3 TE. In that situation, first down from the 1, 'Jumbo' is the best option and Portis scored a touchdown. But the spreading-it-out theory has validity anywhere else on the field.
From Donald in Falls Church:
How many wins do you think it's going to take to make the playoffs out of the NFC? Right now, I see the Redskins finishing 9-7. Are they going to need to get to 10-6 to make it?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I, too, have the Redskins projecting to finish 9-7 -- wins over Philadelphia, Buffalo, Chicago and Minnesota. But 10 wins will be needed to grab the last wild card spot. The Redskins are currently seventh in the conference. The Redskins' remaining opponents are 38-27 (counting Dallas' 7-1 record twice). The best chances to steal a 10th win will be in Tampa Bay -- the Bucs are only 5-4 and the season finale against Dallas. If the Cowboys have home-field wrapped up or even a first-round bye secured, I wouldn't expect several front-line players to see a lot of action.
From Chris in Odenton, Md.:
What's the latest on Randy Thomas? Is he still on track to come back in December?
Ryan O'Halloran:
As far as we've been told, Thomas has experienced no set backs since tearing his triceps against Philadelphia in Week 2 and having surgery a few days later. At the time, we were told it was a 10-12 week injury and this is Week 8 of the recovery time. The training staff has been vague when asked about Thomas' return. The Redskins won't know for sure until Thomas gets on the practice field and has the arm wrenched.
From Thad in Annapolis:
Coach Gibbs repeatedly states in his press conferences that all the games are going to be close and it is a real war. Like many Skins fans I am tired of hearing this. The only reason the games are close is because of Gibbs and his conservative nature and lack of imaginative game plan. When are Gibbs and Co. going to dust off the 700-page playbook and let Al call the games? It is very obvious that Gibbs sets the game plans or even overrides plays that AL calls! (This is what I envisioned Redskin Football to be. This is not the NFL of 1980's. QB's are aloud to pass to Wideouts down the field to set up the run) Why did Gibbs bring in AL in the first place then?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Nice rant, Thad. Responding to some of your points. 1. I, too, am tired of hearing Gibbs use the 'war' reference to every game. The reason they'll be close is the Redskins are the same as just about every other team in the NFL -- average.; 2. The Giants and Arizona games in particular stick out as examples of Gibbs' being too close to the vest and wanting to sit on a lead.; 3. I definitely agree that Joe should leave Al alone and let him call whatever he wants for a period of time. If at that point, things aren't working, Gibbs should get re-involved with the game-plan process.; 4. Except for the Arizona game, I'm not sure Gibbs is that involved during the game. But he definitely has his paws on the game plan during the week; 5. Gibbs brought in Saunders because he knew his play-calling ways weren't going to change. Plus, I have to guess that The Danny was involved as well.
From Susan in Silver Spring:
I was interested to see that your colleague Dan Daly skipped Sunday's Skins game in favor of Colts-Pats. What gives? Has Dan jumped off the D.C. bandwagon?
Ryan O'Halloran:
DD was smart -- he went where the "real" football was being played. He got to see a great game in-person instead of DVR'ing it and having to endure Phil Simms as the commentator. Hey, Phil, we get it -- you have meetings with coaches and players leading into the game. There's no need to mention it, oh, 562 times. Dan will be back at FedEx Field this Sunday ... probably because the Patriots are off.
From SkinsLover in D.C.:
Who is Taylor? And what did Coach Gibbs have to go through with him doing the offseason? If reference to the question yesterday about Andy Reid. I thought Gibbs only had two kids?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Taylor is Joe Gibbs' grandson. Last off-season, he was diagnosed with leukemia. Last time I checked, Joe said Taylor is doing OK becuase it was caught so early. And yes, Joe, has the two sons -- J.D. and Coy.
From Peter:
Isn’t it true that the Skins fundamental problem is lack of talent? On both sides of the ball, they have a few very good players, but that’s it. If that is indeed the cause of their lackluster performance, then the answer would appear to be that the organization is unable to figure out how to get and keep the players they need to make it to the big time, but the owner has yet to figure this out, and for reasons of his own, e.g. unwillingness to let go of control, refuses to bring in a GM and take personnel decisions out of the hands of his creature, Vinny Cerrato.
Ryan O'Halloran:
I don't think the problem this year is lack of talent. They've had some injuries and some players (receivers) simply aren't performing. When it comes to personnel, all of the criticism should be directed at team president Gibbs, The Danny and of course, Vinny. My big problem with them is their trading of draft picks but in the case of Pete Kendall, their hand was forced because of their gamble during the off-season that Todd Wade would work out. There still should be a GM in place to be accountable for the personnel decisions and be the face of the organization. That will need to be the case once Gibbs retires.
From Barry in Reston:
At last Clinton Portis broke through with the kind of game we expected on a weekly basis when we traded for him three years ago. So can we expect more 140+-yard games out of CP or was this a one-time breakout?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Yeah, that was a vintage Portis game. About time for that. As for expectations, probably not 140-yard games but if this is the start of something, expect No. 26 to be around 100 yards, assuming he gets 20-plus carries and stays healthy. That's a big assumption, though.
Ryan O'Halloran
The mailbag is empty. I'll have another chat in a few weeks but will be answering questions if you send emails to skinsmailbag@washingtontimes.com.
]]>
Rogers not in the neighborhood [David Elfin]tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.24582007-10-29T20:34:12Z2007-10-29T20:34:40ZThe Redskins are still waiting for the result of cornerback Carlos Rogers' MRI exam, but it's almost certain that he'll be out at least a month. That would be if Rogers only injured the MCL in his right knee against...twtsports
The Redskins are still waiting for the result of cornerback Carlos Rogers' MRI exam, but it's almost certain that he'll be out at least a month. That would be if Rogers only injured the MCL in his right knee against New England. If it's the ACL, Rogers is done for the year.
Redskins Chat -- Oct. 17tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.22952007-10-17T18:52:02Z2007-10-17T19:45:37ZHey everybody from Redskin Park. Welcome to another live chat, reviewing Green Bay and previewing Arizona. Open locker room was from 12:30-1:30 today. Joe Bugel said he expects Casey Rabach and Todd Wade to play against Arizona. Lorenzo Alexander has...twtsports
From Henry in Virginia Beach:
Don't you think a big problem with this team is Al Saunders? We have a good Defense and a good QB now but Al is messing it up with his play calling and lack of feel for the game. First, when was the last time one of those reverses actually gained more then 5 yards, so why must we run some version of them 3 times a game? In GB it was raining and guys were dropping and fumbling balls all over the place but lets have 9 guys handle the ball on a rainy day when nobody can hang onto.good play! Second, 3 and 1 Saunders calls a pass to Sellarsguess what Al another drop. Another 3 and 1 and Al pitches the ball back 4 yards to CP and he doesnt even get back to the line of scrimmage.
Ryan O'Halloran:
No, Al Saunders isn't a big problem. Dropped catches are the problem. Portis fumbling is the problem. A creaky offensive is the problem. The reverse has been a successful play for the Redskins since 2004, especially with Moss and Randle El. Before Moss slipped, remember, he fumbled. On third-and-1, that's not an automatic run down against the Packers because Green Bay knew any important run would be going to the left side. Granted, there are always going to be nit picks within any game as it relates to play calling but I think Saunders has called some good games.
Barry in Reston:
What's the latest with the offensvie line?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Center Casey Rabach is expected to play. ... Right tackle Todd Wade hopes to play but will be replaced by current right guard Jason Fabini if he can't go. ... If Fabini moves to tackle, Rick DeMulling or Mike Pucillo will play right guard. ... The big deal is Rabach. If he was unable to play that would require a lot of juggling -- Pucillo to center, DeMulling to right guard, Fabini to right tackle and who knows what kind of chemistry that group would have.
From Pete in Arlington:
How surprised are you by the way the defense is playing?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I thought the defense would be improved but their play has been surprising. I thought they would move up to around 15th or 16th in the league (up from 31st). Instead, they're in the top five (don't have the statistics in front of me). It's already drawing comparisions to the 2004 team but there's a different, I think: Even though they didn't give up yards in '04, they didn't exactly create a ton of turnovers or sacks. This team is on their way to doing that.
From Thad in Annapolis:
After a big win it seems that skins have a let down, with the coaching staff that they have in place this should not happen but it does why?
Ryan O'Halloran:
You're right -- this team has been prone to letdowns ever since Gibbs came back in 2004. Three years ago -- beat Tampa in opener, lose next four; Two years ago -- start 3-0, lose two straight; start 5-3, lose three straight; Last year -- get back to 2-2, lose three straight. This year -- start 2-0, lose to Giants. ... As to why it's happened this year, the Giants loss was a complete letdown. The Redskins for sure thought they would be 3-0 heading into their bye. As for Green Bay, circumstances (injuries) have to be considered but if you're a road underdog, I'm not sure if a loss can be classified as a letdown. As for the coaching staff, I'm sure they're trying to push some buttons this week.
From John in Fairfax:
Do the Cardinals have a chance in you-know-what of winning Sunday?
Ryan O'Halloran:
There's always a chance but in the Cardinals' case, it's not much of a shot, especially if Tim Rattay has to start at quarterback. He's been with the team less than two weeks. The Redskins will win 24-6.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Practice update: Not practicing today are Stephon Heyer, Casey Rabach, Todd Wade, Shawn Springs (in Texas with his ill father) and Pete Kendall (rest). Fabini was at RT, Pucillo at C, DeMulling at RG and Lorenzo Alexander at LG.
Ryan O'Halloran:
That's it for this week. I'll be back Tuesday to talk about the Cardinals and Patriots.]]>
Today's Redskins Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.21822007-10-09T17:58:54Z2007-10-09T19:37:59ZI'm back here at Redskin Park. The typical day-off stuff means not a lot is going on today. The players have to report at 7 a.m. Wednesday for film review and then they'll get into the Green Bay game plan....twtsports
From Skinslover in Atlanta:
I'm looking ahead. I think the Cowgirls will lose their next two games first to the Pats, and then to Your Vikes. Will Jackson be back by then for the Vikes and what do you think there chances are to win with or without him?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Glad to start with a question regarding my Vikings, who stink like all get out. Dallas will lose to New England on Sunday in the Game of the Year So Far. But the Cowboys will throttle the Vikings in two weeks. The Cowboys could be 8-1 (although that means they've won at Philly and the Giants) when they host the Redskins in November. If the Vikings have Jackson at QB, they have ZERO chance. Dallas got big-time lucky last night, though.
From Gary in Reston:
Was it me or was Mike Martz out to lunch on Sunday?
Ryan O'Halloran:
No, it wasn't you. It was befuddling how Martz called the Lions' plays. He didn't adjust whatsoever once the Redskins showed they weren't going to be blitzing at all. And for some reason, he didn't use Kevin Jones until the second half. Granted, the Lions had some success with draw plays but the Redskins were giving that up -- sacrifice the 5-yard carry to defend the 15-yard crossing route. And the Lions defensive coaching staff -- they should return their paychecks. They made no effort to pressure Jason Campbell -- he was put on the ground only twice in more than 30 dropbacks.
From Barry in Centerville:
With four games played, how would you grade the following players: Jason Campbell, Clinton Portis, Sean Taylor, Chris Cooley and Shawn Springs?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Jason Campbell -- B: He has four touchdowns, three interceptions, 869 yards passing and an 84.3 rating. He's had some bumps in the road, but that's to be expected. There's no question he's the guy to lead this team.
Clinton Portis -- B: Portis has 66 rushes for 299 yards and three touchdowns. He has also caught 9 passes. He gets a good grade because he didn't have a training camp and yet stepped in right away with 17 carries against Miami. And the guy plays his butt off.
Chris Cooley -- C: He has three touchdowns but only 10 catches for 80 yards in four games. He's been an average player but mostly because of what defenses are doing to cover him.
Sean Taylor -- B: Has two interceptions and isn't missing nearly as many tackles as last year.
Shawn Springs -- Incomplete. I still think they're working him into the lineup.
From Tom in D.C.:
You mentioned the five road games coming up in today's story. What's your prediction on how they come out of his seven-game stretch?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Here goes (subject to change): lose at Green Bay, win over Arizona, lose at NE, win at NYJ, win vs. Philly, lose at Dallas, win at Tampa Bay. ... That would leave the Redskins at 7-4. In the dreadful NFC that would leave them in great position for a wild card berth since Dallas remains the NFC East favorite. The worst case is they go 2-5 during the stretch.
From Bill in Bethesda:
What's surprised you so far in the NFL this season?
Ryan O'Halloran:
In the NFC, New Orleans falling apart (0-4) tops the list. The Saints were bad defensively last year but the offense covered their butts. Now the OL is a turnstile, McAllister is out for the year and the Saints are finished. What this year will show is that Reggie Bush isn't an every-down, between-the-tackles NFL running back.
In the AFC, San Diego's struggles are interesting. But at 2-3, they're only a half-game out of the division lead so I think they might be OK although I said last week they were finished.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Well, that's it for this week. No more questions in the Inbox. See ya next week.]]>
Today's Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.20622007-10-02T18:39:30Z2007-10-02T19:34:01ZTime to get started. I think this is the ninth Redskins chat of the season. The team returned to practice yesterday after six days off. They're off today before starting preparation for the Detroit Lions tomorrow. But there was a...twtsports
From Tim:
Let's review -- the Redskins have played 3 games and we have two players on offensive line who perhaps couldn't start for most teams and they are not young plus we have brought in 2 receivers because one we gave 2 draft picks for doesn't play during the game. WE NEED A GENERAL MANAGER. Joe is fine as coach and team organizer, but is not gifted in picking players.
Ryan O'Halloran:
I disagree and agree with Tim on some of his points. Compared to the last few years, playing Wade and Fabini in place of Jansen and Thomas is an upgrade over the depth issues. Those two players aren't Pro Bowlers but they're better than guys like Mark Wilson, Jim Molinaro, Cory Raymer -- guys pressed into service. They're on-par with Ray Brown. ... Where I agree -- the trading of draft picks for Brandon Lloyd may go down as a worse decision than signing Adam Archuleta. At least ol' Archie started for a half a season. Gibbs' strength isn't picking players (that was Bobby Beathard's job in Gibbs Version 1.0). A GM isn't coming anytime soon, though.
From Kevin in Fort Lauderdale:
You wrote that Brandon Lloyd did not participate in post practice drills w/ the other receivers and QB's. What is the deal with Lloyd? Is he a malcontent? Was his talent in S.F. fleeting? Is he buried in the coaches' doghouse?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Glad you picked up on that -- it was pretty noticeable to a couple of us. Lloyd doesn't come out to the field 90 minutes before the game to work with Cambpell, either -- that's Cooley, Randle El, Thrash and now Caldwell. I don't think he showed a lot of talent in SF. As for being a malcontent/in the doghouse, that's a tough thing to speculate on but let's assume they're not happy with him.
From SkinsLover:
Is Lloyd not showing effort in practice? And what's up with signing all these receivers?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Lloyd's lack of playing time is generating more questions this year than Archuleta's awful play did last year. Anyway, we don't see enough of practice to form an opinion on whether a guy is working hard. What's up with the signing of McCardell specifically is that Moss' groin thing may be a season-long concern and after Randle El, the Redskins don't exactly have a lot of proven play-makers on the roster. Thrash is a great special teams player but a possession receiver at best.
From CNYSkinFan in Syracuse:
With a 13 game grind coming up -- how worried should we be that Portis is still hurting after coming off a week of rest during the bye week? Is this gamesmanship by Gibbs or is Portis really hurt? Is this why Portis was not at the end of the game against the Giants?
Ryan O'Halloran:
There should be mild concern about Portis' new right knee injury. The best thing about Clinton is that he plays hard -- every play. The worst thing about Clinton is that he never takes plays off. That means he'll get banged up. Trainer Bubba Tyer said about an hour ago that Portis' knee injury did not prevent him from being available on the final plays against the Giants.
From Gary in Reston:
How brutal could this month be for the Redskins' secondary?
Ryan O'Halloran:
It could be gruesome. The Lions are first in passing yards, the Packers are fourth, the Cardinals are 12th, the Patriots are third. The Redskins rank 13th in pass defense but have to get some turnovers and sacks to slow those teams down.
From Barry in Richmond:
Were the players surprised they got all of last week off?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Not really. But they were definitely thankful. Gibbs had supposedly floated some hints that the team would get the entire week off with a win over the Giants. After the loss, most of us expected him to practice Tuesday and Wednesday. But he said he met with a few of his veterans on Monday and decided it was best to have six days off. We'll see if it works this week.
Ryan O'Halloran:
A bye week evidently means fewer questions so I'm cutting this chat short so I can finish up tomorrow's Insider. I'll be back next week at 2 p.m. to chat about the Lions game and look ahead to the Green Bay game.
]]>
Live Chat -- Sept. 25tag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.19492007-09-25T18:37:24Z2007-09-25T19:56:36ZHey everybody. Instead of chatting from Redskin Park, I'm at Casa O'Halloran in Loudoun County because the team is off until next Monday. A somewhat curious decision by coach Joe Gibbs (he's made a lot of those recently, hasn't he?)...twtsports
From Joe in Sacramento, Calif.
Hello from 3,000 miles away. I do not want to harp on this loss, even though it was a big one to lose (at home, with a lead against a divisional opponent), but to me it seems that this teams lacks direction. Since Gibbs returned, the Skins have moved in a better direction, but they are not all together. Saunders saying he does not know why his best player is not on the field? Gibbs saying Betts and Portis are essentially the same (which it is painfully obvious they are not)? And again, absolutely horrible clock management no matter how the coaches spin it. How come with all 3 of these coaches, who are "geniuses" and among the highest paid seem to be on different pages?
Ryan O'Halloran
First, there's nothing wrong with harping on a loss like that. Come next month when the Patriots throttle the Redskins -- that one isn't worth the time to harp on. Your question about direction has been thrown around ever since Gibbs came back in 2004. Ultimately, he's in charge. I don't totally disagree with him saying Betts/Portis are one in the same but I absolutely think Portis should have been in the game on third and fourth downs Sunday from the 1-yard line. As for Saunders saying he had no idea about Portis not being in there -- Al is very close to the vest when it comes to personnel, including Portis' habits of coming out of the game at his choosing. I didn't have big a problem with clock management down the stretch against the Giants as I did the personnel packages and calling the same play twice.
From CNYSkinFan in Syracuse, N.Y.:
Is there any clarity on who calls the plays for the Redskins? I know that Saunders is the OC and calls the plays most of the time but Gibbs has repeatedly said that he makes the decisions on when to kick FGs and go for it on fourth downs. It seems in crucial situations there are a ton of mistakes and wasted time. Is that because too many people are trying to make the decision?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Saunders calls the offensive plays. Period. Has since he got here. Will likely call the plays until he leaves. Gibbs makes the call on to kick field goals or go for it on fourth down and obviously he and Joe Bugel talk to Saunders a lot in-game about the running plays. But the notion that Saunders is a pass-oriented play-caller isn't correct -- his Kansas City offenses were rushing machines. In crucial situations, the mistakes have been penalties, clock management, iffy play-calling. And yes, there are times where they might be too many cooks in the kitchen.
From Mike in Coral Springs, Fla.:
In Gibbs 1, the Redskins were famous for making key half time adjustments, during Gibbs 2 its the opponent that most often makes the winning adjustments. Any theories as to why this is the case?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Couple stats: First half yards/points against Miami -- 95/3; second half -- 305/13
Philadelphia: 209 yards and 10 points by the Redskins in the first half; 126 yards and 10 points in the second half.
Against the Giants: 179 yards and 17 points in first half; 91 yards and zero points in second half.
Translation: The Redskins did a decent job offensively in the second halves against the Dolphins and Eagles. But a couple factors against the Giants -- they didn't have the ball that much until the last 5 minutes and when they did, I felt they didn't pass enough. Their running game was stalled and they shouldn't have sat on the lead.
From SkinsLover in D.C.:
What's the attitude at the Park today, and how does this lost affect the teams bye week schedule? also Carlos calling out the offense in the post game interview...what's up with that? Did CP talk after the game didn't see any interviews with him?
Ryan O'Halloran:
This question was sent to me on Monday. The mood at the Park yesterday was one of the players saying, 'We let one slip away and it stinks' combined with, 'We're still 2-1.' Several players said the loss stung and they didn't sleep that great, which is surprising considering they've played so many games at so many levels. I didn't see Rogers' comments on Comcast after the game but if he's calling out the offense, he needs a mirror to look at himself. Portis did speak with reporters on Monday.
From Irving:
What do they see in Carlos Rogers?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Well, that's direct. But it warrants a discussion since Rogers hasn't progressed as much as a top draft pick should three games into their third season. I write about Carlos a little bit in tomorrow's paper. He's been thrown at 23 times in three games. He better get better in a hurry -- October brings matchups against high-powered passing offenses: Detroit, Green Bay, New England and Arizona.
From Dale:
Given this last game, especially the second half, do you think the offensive line has got it together yet? There only two starters from last year!
Ryan O'Halloran:
Nope, the offensive line doesn't have it together just yet and that's totally understandable since two months ago, Pete Kendall was with the Jets, Todd Wade was a guard (not a tackle) and Jason Fabini a tackle (not a guard). Chris Samuels and Casey Rabach are the only two holdover starters. It's going to take some time for the group to get on the same page communication-wise. That's true in run blocking and pass protection.
From Barry in Reston:
What was the biggest mistake made during the Redskins final offensive drive in terms of time management/play calling?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Let's this the things that went wrong. That'd be easier
1. After getting a first down at the Giants 18 with 1:22 left, Campbell should have spiked it instead of rushing. The shotgun snap went off his chest when he wasn't ready for it and the Redskins lost 3 yards and 15 seconds when Campbell rushed to kill the clock on second down.
2. After getting a first down at the Giants 1 with 58 seconds left, I wouldn't have spiked it. I would have tried to use Campbell on a quick QB sneak or a quick Sellers hand off up the middle to try and surprise the Giants, who had their nickel package on the field. If the Redskins don't make it, there's still plenty of time.
3. I had no problem with the second-down play-call -- play action pass to Sellers that fell incomplete. Sellers wouldn't have scored even if he would have caught it. But on third and fourth downs, you MUST have Clinton Portis in the game.
4. On third down, I would have tried play action and have Campbell on the move again with a run/pass/throw away option.
5. Now, here's the biggest thing. After Betts gets stopped on third down, the Redskins have the same play call on fourth down. But there's nearly 40 seconds remaining. In hindsight, because New York defended that play so well, I would have sent in a new personnel group with a new play or kept the Jumbo package in the game and call a different play.
From John in Fairfax:
After the bye, can we expect to see Reche Caldwell on the field?
Ryan O'Halloran:
If he's here to play, I would expect him to play against Detroit. That will be nearly a month after he signed and he should have a more-than-just-working knowledge of the offense. That would mean, Brandon Lloyd, it's time to get out of uniform.
From anonymous:
Three questions:
1. Last season, there were questions about wheter Gibbs and Saunders were on the same page with play calling and offensive team identity. It seems like that is happening again when you look at the lack of consistency in what they want to do. Is there something going on there that hasn't gotten public yet?
2. On defense, I noticed that Carlos Rogers was the corner in the game during single corner sets as opposed to Springs. Is Rogers the number 1 guy? Please say he isn't, he's terrible and plays way to far off the receiver.
3. What the hell is the deal with Brandon Lloyd?
Ryan O'Halloran:
1. As for the Gibbs/Saunders relationship, I think it's fine and they're on the same page. Saunders has embraced Campbell as a play maker and Saunders' run-game philosophy is in-line. But if the head coach asks the play-caller to be conservative and sit on a lead, the play-caller has to listen.
2. Sorry to disappoint you, but Rogers is your No. 1 corner. Springs is No. 2 and Smoot will be No. 2A when he gets back to full health.
3. Brandon Lloyd's deal? If I had a good answer for that one, I'd be in line to receive an honorary degree in psychology. A different dude, for sure.
From Sidney in Virginia Beach:
Is it just me or does it seem like whenever the Skins have a lead, the coach would go into a conservation mode to "protect the lead" instead of continuing to attack the defense and score? If the offense approaches every possession like they are down by 10 points, that sense of urgency will always be present.
Ryan O'Halloran:
It's not just you. That's been the case since Gibbs came back to the Redskins. In those rare occasions where they've had a double-digit halftime lead, he likes to sit on it and let the defense finish out the game. It cost the Redskins on Sunday. It did cost them last year, I think against Tennessee. The time to sit on a lead is in the last 10 minutes.
From William:
If Joe Nobody (myself) can tell what the Redskins are looking to do when I see how they line up, I wonder what a highly paid Defensive Coordinator, or a 5 million a year Middle Linebacker are able to see from the field. Is it just me?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I just checked the replay of the final snap and Antonio Pierce and Kawika Mitchell are shifting to their right right before the play. They recognized the formation (same as on third down) and knew what coming. It was easy pickings.
From John:
1. Why haven't we seen Brandon Lloyd on the field and involved in the outcome of the game, it seems as if he's being overlooked. Is this because of us quality of play?
2. Is Caldwell a better option than Lloyd?
Ryan O'Halloran:
1. Lloyd is no longer part of the Redskins' short-range offensive plans. He's their fourth receiver and when the team does play four-wide, it's usually Chris Cooley in the slot. And it's ALL because of his quality of play.
2. Caldwell will be a better option once given the chance.
From Doug in Lovell, Maine:
Would you explain why a defensive line gets worn down more than the offensive line by a running attack? I am afraid it is not intuitive since presumably each uses maximum exertion on evey play.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Yeah, that was a topic last week when the Redskins were running it effectively. It's probably more of a mental thing -- giving up 5,6,7 yards a rush can wear down a defensive line mentally as well as physically because getting pounded on might effect their pass rushing abilities.
From Michael:
I have been noticing since the Redskins let Antonio Pierce go to the Giants
three years ago, our defense has been getting "torched" by their offense.
Pierce was the "QB" of Gregg Williams defense and Williams even said he is
the smartest at that position other than Fletcher in his systems. Thus this
begs me to wonder is he giving Eli and the offense "keys" on the Skins
defense against the run and the pass? Sure seems like it.
Ryan O'Halloran:
I think there's some truth to that. The Giants and Redskins play twice a year so that Pierce probably helped the Giants' offense more in 2005 when he was new to the team. The Redskins generally change up their defensive signals often and might go to extra lengths when they face Pierce.
From Brett:
Would it have been legal for Gibbs and/or Al Saunders to tell JC to "huddle up" before getting to the line to run that last play? And, while we're at it, I thought Al and Joe were offensive masterminds. Did we really PLAN to run the same play two times in a row?
Ryan O'Halloran:
It would have been perfectly fine. What I would like to find out next week is whether there was any communication between Bill Lazor into Campbell's helmet radio. If so, the coaches could have told Jason to slow it down or could have sent in a new play. And yes, they planned to run the same play twice.
Ryan O'Halloran:
The mailbox is now empty -- lots of good stuff this week. I'll hang around until 3 p.m. if anybody has questions.
Ryan O'Halloran:
OK, folks, that's all for this week. I'll be back next Tuesday at 2 p.m. where we can discuss Lions-Redskins or the season premiere of Grey's Anatomy or the release of Bruce Springsteen's latest album. Take care.
]]>
Today's Live Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.18512007-09-18T18:18:39Z2007-09-18T19:59:00ZOK, folks, sorry for the delay. Just got done talking to Marcus Washington and Jason Campbell outside Redskin Park. To the questions. From SkinsLover: A couple of questions: First, why did we decide to run another play because Philly called...twtsports
From SkinsLover:
A couple of questions: First, why did we decide to run another play because Philly called a timeout (before halftime)? Also, why does it seem Carlos Rogers is always the one that gets beat on crucial third or fourth downs?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Joe Gibbs was bailed out by Andy Reid late in last night's first half. With 14 seconds left, Gibbs sent out the field goal team. It was a bad decision -- he has to show more confidence in his young quarterback to do the right thing near the goal-line. Reid called the timeout and Gibbs sent the offense back on to the field and Campbell threw a terrific touchdown pass to Chris Cooley. As for Rogers, it seems that way because that's exactly what's happening. I haven't reviewed the game tape or studied my notes yet but your theory will probably be confirmed.
From Irving:
When does the flex scheduling start?
From Ryan O'Halloran:
The question came in before last night's game but it became a lot more interesting once the Redskins won and went to 2-0. The NFL flex scheduling starts in Week 10 (Nov. 18). The only game that can't be moved for the Redskins is their Thursday night game against Chicago on Dec. 6. In Week 10, the Redskins play at the Cowboys. At the very least, that game will be moved to 4 p.m. Fox is sending its A team -- Buck and Aikman -- to FraudEx for Giants-Redskins.
From Dustin in Syracuse, N.Y.:
Reche Caldwell was inactive and Lloyd missed another chance to score a TD this week. Any chance Caldwell will be active for the Giants game? Or are we looking after the bye week?
Ryan O'Halloran:
The Lloyd pass was overthrown and he would have been out of bounds had he caught it, but again, he pulled up on the play only to start running again. He played only a few snaps and has obviously fallen behind James Thrash. I expect Caldwell to be in uniform against NYG. Simple math would suggest Lloyd would be inactive but stranger things have happened.
From Gary Fogel in Reston:
I hate to be the one to rain on the Skins' parade when they're 2-0 and just beat the Eagles on the road, but how much more impressive (and less nervewracking) would last night's win have been had Campbell been able to connect with a wide-open Moss late in the fourth quarter? Over the long haul, Jason's got to be able to make that throw to become a true top-tier QB, right?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Had Campbell and Moss connected for the touchdown, it would have been an emphatic exclamation point on the victory, making it 27-12. Yes, Campbell has to be able to make that throw and I think he will sooner rather than later. The good sign on that play was how easily Moss got open.
From Brent in Arlington:
I am skeptically optimistic about what I've seen so far this season especially considering the injuries on the O-line. I can't believe how well our backups have stood in there for our starters. In regards to Randy Thomas, is a torn triceps an injury that could sideline him for awhile, or is it something that he'll play through, but will likely be a nagging injury to him all season? Also, our bye week appeared to be unfortunately early, but considering Smoot's hamstring and Randy's triceps, maybe it's a blessing in disguise...thoughts?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Thomas hasn't come back to Redskin Park from getting an MRI on the triceps. If the muscle is completely torn, he's probably out for the season; if it's a partial tear, he could be back in a few weeks. As for the replacements, Todd Wade had a solid debut at right tackle, which isn't surprising considering the guy's a good tackle. Jason Fabini is the new right guard with Thomas injured. His play will be something to monitor more closely. Aside from two false start penalties, he appeared to hold his own. The early bye isn't a bad thing. Although it comes in Week 4, it comes in Week 10 of the season (counting training camp).
From John in Fairfax:
What do you make of the defensive backfield so far? I love the way Taylor is hitting and running around like crazy. But what of Landry and the corners? It seems to be a pretty noticeable improvement over last season.
Ryan O'Halloran:
The secondary has been OK. No big plays is a plus.The Redskins are 18th in yards, but fourth in yards per reception allowed, which confirms the no-big-play theory. And their first in third down defense. I'm witholding judgement on Taylor until I watch the game from last night. Landry's presence allows Taylor to do some things more suited to his strengths (roam center field).
From Steve in Rockville:
Giants, Lions, Packers and Cardinals ... oh my! Are we going to be 6-0 heading into the Game of the Year at New England?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Obviously, the Gibbs-made Kool Aid has been delivered to Rockville. The home games against the Giants, Lions and Cardinals -- the Redskins should win those games even though Detroit could cause some problems with its passing game. The Packer game in Green Bay could be interesting. The Packers can't really run it yet. I'll predict 5-1 going into New England then ... CRASH! ... back to earth thanks to Tommy Brady.
From Larry D. in College Park:
Obviously the Eagles and Giants have their issues. So who's going to win the NFC East: our Skins or the hated Cowboys?
Ryan O'Halloran:
The Giants stink on defense. The Eagles -- where to begin? Brian Dawkins looked bad in coverage and Donovan McNabb looked really bad moving around the pocket. So, yes, it's a two-team race. But I think Dallas has to be considered the favorite.
Ryan O'Halloran:
That's all for this week. I'll be back next Tuesday at 2 p.m. to review the Giants game and look ahead to the bye weekend.
]]>
Today's Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.17312007-09-11T18:11:07Z2007-09-11T19:56:05ZGreetings from Redskin Park. The team is off today and tomorrow. Today is a regular day off and Joe Gibbs gave them Wednesday off because they beat Miami. The Redskins will practice Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Even though it was...twtsports
From Brent in Arlington:
What are the pros and cons of the Todd Wade vs. Stephon Heyer battle for the right tackle spot? Is one particularly better than the other in run or pass blocking?
Ryan O'Halloran:
(Sorry for the delay on answering this one. We're having a discussion in the media room about Gibbs' appearance on his radio show and did he or didn't he name Todd Wade the starter at RT) ... I think Wade is the best option and is better at run or pass blocking than Heyer. Wade's pros is his experience. Period. He'll get at least two games to do the job. If after the bye, the Redskins think they have a problem at RT, then maybe Heyer gets a shot.
From William:
Can you give an update on the El Gaucho Bowl '06? Jim Ducibella is
claiming that you never paid up. Is this year double or nothing?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I got off to a flying start -- 13-2. Only the Eagles and Rams let me down. Duce went 10-5 so I hold an enormous three-game edge. As for not paying up, guilty. But we didn't go to Seattle last year so I didn't have the chance. He did pay for our lunch at Hooters this spring.
From Donald in Richmond:
It seems to me that, especially now with Jansen down, the O-line isn't optimal this year for "Joe Gibbs football." Do you disagree? If I'm right, what can they do, given the skill position guys they've got, to still move the ball and get points?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I still think the Redskins will be able to play "Gibbs Football" without Jansen in the lineup. Granted, they may run more to the left side and do some more pulling when running to the right side, but I think their big-picture plan remains the same -- run it first, pass it second. They had 41 runs and 22 passes against Miami.
From Brett:
What's the real story behind making Springs the third CB? We need more information on this because it doesn't make any sense.
Ryan O'Halloran:
The real story will probably never be revealed until Springs leaves the Redskins. Here's what we know. On his radio show at noon, Gibbs said Springs' injury was a hamstring but he wasn't on the injury report because he didn't miss any practice time and, we believe, Springs went to the training staff on his own. Plus, they didn't want the Dolphins to know about the injury. But he should be playing more only because he's their best cover corner.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Got delayed there. Was outside talking to Todd Wade, who confirmed that he was is the starter at RT. And that's the right decision.
From SkinsFan in Alexandria:
Suisham's game-winning FG was right down the middle, and he's been pretty reliable since the Skins signed him. Is it possible our long kicking nightmares are finally over?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Have to admit, Suisham has been pretty impressive since he missed his first field goal of the preseason. He's a good kickofff guy and has a lot of FG range. But long-term, that's really tough to predict when it comes to kickers. Look at the Chiefs. They draft a kicker in the fifth round of this year's draft, hand him the job and after one game, they're looking at a veteran kicker.
From Gary Fogel in Reston:
So Clinton Portis takes off all of the preseason, then looks to be in midseason form in the opener. Guess he was right all along. Does that mean other big-name players might take his approach next summer and skip the preseason, too?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Portis (17 carries, 98 yards) certainly looked good against Miami. I'll give Portis and the Redskins the nod for their decision not to do any playing or practicing in the preseason. But we'll see how that carries over for the next few games. As for other big-name players taking the approach, I think it'll become a trend with running backs especially. Tomlinson, S. Jackson, L. Johnson already do this.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Another news update. Reche Caldwell, who started at receiver for New England last year, is in the building. If he's signed, this really would mark the beginning of the end for Brandon Lloyd. I think Caldwell would instantly become the Redskins No. 3 receiver.
From Brett:
So, what's your prediction for Springs this week? Does he play more? Do they match him up with The Eagles best receiver? (I guess that'd be Reggie Brown.)
Ryan O'Halloran:
If his hamstring is fine, I think he'll play more because the Eagles usually run three-receiver sets and they will definitely try to throw it more than Miami did. I don't think they'll match him up with Brown all the time because the Redskins play sides of the field instead of just individual receivers.
From Jason in D.C.:
For all of the talking that Fred Smoot normally does, I haven't heard him say anything about the gift interception that he dropped on Sunday. Has anyone asked him about that? For as good as he thinks that he is, you'd think that he'd have more than 3 interceptions over the last two seasons.
Ryan O'Halloran:
I don't think Jason will joining the Smooter Fan Club anytime soon. On the INT, Smoot said he was thinking about running before he actually caught it or some mumbo jumbo that he tries to spew and the TV folks each up on a daily basis. The reason Smoot is back with the Redskins is that he stunk with Minnesota. And he wasn't any better on Sunday. He allowed completions of 4, 14, 8, 8 and 14 yards and committed a penalty that kept a Miami drive alive.
From Larry D. in L.A.:
Will Jansen's injury be devastating to the Skins, or just a difficult hurdle to overcome?
Ryan O'Halloran:
It's a difficult hurdle to overcome. Wade is more than competent enough to fill in. The Redskins can't afford more season-ending injuries, though. Tackle was the one place they had some depth.
Ryan O'Halloran:
That's it for this week. Appreciate the questions. Next Tuesday at 2 p.m., I'll be bleary-eyed from the Monday night game in Philadelphia but I'll chat about the game. See ya.
]]>
Today's Live Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.16152007-09-04T18:42:46Z2007-09-04T19:53:30ZHello again from Redskins Park. The regular season finally starts on Sunday when the Redskins host the Miami Dolphins. Not much going on out here today -- it's the traditional player's day off although several players -- LaRon Landry, Santana...twtsports
From Skins Lover in PG County:
Who has the team kept on the practice squad? And what do you think of Reed Doughty?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I had a note on the practice squad but had to cut it from today's notebook to make room for the No. 2 quarterback update. The practice squad is FB Brian Bell, DE Alex Buzbee, CB John Eubanks, OL Kili Lefotu, LB Matt Sinclair, WR Burl Toler, LB Anthony Trucks, CB Byron Westbrook. Bell and Westbrook were teammates at DeMatha HS and Buzbee played at Georgetown. ... About Doughty. The fact he's still around means the team thinks he's made progress and has upside. It's unlikely he'll get a ton of time on defense but he'll play special teams again this year.
From John:
Can the left side of the line possibly be ready for the season? Kendall and Samuels are slated to start not having taken a single snap together.
Ryan O'Halloran:
True, new LG Pete Kendall has played eight snaps as a Redskin, none of them with Chris Samuels alongside at LT. Samuels is bound to have some rust and has admitted as much. It might take most of the first game for him to get into football shape and I expect the coaches to give him some help in the form of a TE or FB in blocking Jason Taylor. I expect Kendall and Samuels to get on the same page rather quickly. They have a combined 20 years of NFL experience so this isn't their first rodeo.
From Christopher in Baltimore:
Please help me understand what is REALLY going on with the Skins RB situation. Is Clinton Portis taking all the first team work this week? Coach Joe said he will start - but should we expect to see Betts and Portis alternate? I like Betts but I think he surprised some people last year - he is solid backup - but he is not a premier franchise back like CP. Can I expect CP to go for 1200+ yards this season?
Ryan O'Halloran:
What REALLY is going on with the Redskins RB situation really unclear. We won't know for sure what Joe Gibbs has in mind and what his marching orders to Al Saunders are until Sunday's game. Gibbs did say Portis will start, which is pretty interesting considering the guy hasn't played since last November. In the early going this month, I fully expect Portis and Betts to rotate and Betts could get more carries while Portis gets into football shape. I do think Betts can be a No. 1A-type back -- he was a surprise last year but hasn't done it for 16 games. As for Portis, 1,200 yards would be a stretch.
From Joe in Sacramento:
Hello from 3,000 miles away. When the Skins cut Wynn, Marshall and Salave'a it was described as cutting three good locker room guys. There are times when other players are discussed, most notably Lloyd and maybe Taylor, that they are not good locker room guys. Can you give any specific examples of what gives these aforementioned (and other) players these reputations.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Yes, all three guys were good in the locker room and Wynn especially was a respected team leader and go-to guy for the media. Speaking for all the beat writers, we'll miss No. 97, whose locker was just inside the room's main entrance. I would not classify Taylor as a bad locker room guy. Some might because he doesn't talk to the media, but that's sour grapes. Taylor was aloof his first year, opened up a little bit in Year 2 but has been pretty tight-lipped ever sinice. He's a lead-by-my-actions guy. As for Lloyd, when your behavior gets you invited to Joe Gibbs' office twice in a few days (last December), then there is a problem, especially when Gibbs proceeds to tell the media about the meetings. One veteran told me last year that Lloyd is a little too sarcastic, but maybe he's changed this year.
From Steve in Rockville:
Considering they didn't play at all during the preseason, do you expect Portis and/or Samuels to show any signs of rust on Sunday?
From Ryan O'Halloran:
I think they'll show some rust. Samuels I mentioned earlier. Portis' rust will be in how he picks the holes, how he follows his blocks, how he bounces off tacklers. If I'm Saunders, I try to give Clinton about 10 carries and then Betts 20 carries for starters.
From Brett in Wyncote, Pa.:
We all heard that Cooley's deal was six more years at $30 million and that he's happy because now he can possibly "retire a Redskin.” But we hear that all the time and then two years later, the player is a salary cap casualty. What is the deal really worth? How many times will they renegotiate and convert salary into guaranteed money before they cut him and I have to retire yet another jersey to my closet?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Cooley's deal is 6 years, $30 million, including $14 million in guaranteed money. A lot of players use that retirement line and then, as you point out, they're gone a few years later. I think I ran that quote, though, because Cooley is one of those guys that will be here a long time. If a player like Shawn Springs had said earlier in camp he wants to retire here, I probably wouldn't have used it since it probably won't happen. For Cooley, you could foresee him playing the first three years of the deal -- which would make him 29 years old -- and then ripping up the final three years and giving him another 5-year deal, which would carry him until he's 34.
From Gary in Reston:
The Redskins first six games: Dolphins, Eagles, Giants, Lions, Packers, Cardinals ... am I crazy for thinking they could actually open up 5-1?
Ryan O'Halloran:
You're not too crazy. I think the Redskins will go 4-2, losing to the Eagles and Packers. If they go anything less than 4-2, they have no shot at the playoffs. But 5-1? First, they have to hold serve at home, which they haven't been able to do with any consistency since Coach Joe's return. They were 3-5 at FraudEx last year, 6-2 in 2005 and 3-5 in 2004. The game they could steal is Green Bay if the defense is able to pressure Brett Favre into some interceptions. Check out the schedule following the first six games: At Pats, at Jets, vs. Eagles, at Dallas, at Tampa Bay. Yikes.
From Joe in Centerville:
What’s your prediction for Sunday’s game?
Ryan O'Halloran:
It's going to be close, but I think the Redskins win 20-16. The Dolphins are in transition with a new coach and new quarterback and their offense might sputter a little bit. Miami is pretty good defensively so yards may be hard to come by early in the game.
From Donald in Falls Church:
So Coach Joe doesn't want to reveal who his No. 2 QB is. Isn't it a slam-dunk that it's Collins?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I think it will be Collins. Joe didn't want to say what his decision was because he hadn't talked to either player. C'mon Joe. That takes 5 seconds. He knew he would be asked about it after practice yesterday and could have told Collins and Brunell his decision and say he would talk to them more about it later. I hope this thing can be settled on Wednesday.
From Larry in Brooklyn:
All I keep hearing is how the D line will be the major reason this team struggles to win 8 games. Did you pay attention to our D line in 2004 and 2005? Those teams had top 10 defenses. This d-line is just as good if not better. Our back 7 is much better now then it was then. I wish you journalists would do your homework before you make asinine predictions based on your anti-Redskin bias.
Ryan O'Halloran:
How do you really feel Larry? The DL was just part of the reason the defense was bad last year. They didn't create a consistent pass rush and didn't do a solid job against the run. But there were far other problems that contributed to the demise. I did pay attention to the DL in 2004 and 2005. The reason they were effective was because they were healthy and the reason they had some sacks is that Gregg Williams trusted his corners in man coverage so he blitzed safeties and linebackers. If Andre Carter plays the run better and Cornelius Griffin stays healthy, this could be an OK defensive line but for the time being, expect Williams to blitz LBs and DBs to create more pressure. The back 7 is better than last year so I'll give you that point. As for making asinine predictions, it's fun to go out on a limb to create some conversation. As for not doing my homework, I won't touch that one but rest assured I spend several hours each Monday and Tuesday watching that week's Redskins game.
Ryan O'Halloran:
The mailbag is empty but I'll hang out until 3 p.m. if anybody has questions. Send them to skinsmailbag@washingtontimes.com
Ryan O'Halloran:
All right folks. That's all for today. I'll be back next Tuesday at 2 p.m. to rehash the Dolphins game and look ahead to the Monday nighter in Philadelphia. Take care.
]]>
Today's Live Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.15272007-08-28T18:12:01Z2007-08-28T19:46:16ZOK, it's almost 2 p.m. so let's get started. The Redskins, thank goodness, close the preseason Thursday night in Jacksonville. They're 2-1 but who really cares about the record? There are still a bunch of unresolved issues -- most of...
OK, it's almost 2 p.m. so let's get started. The Redskins, thank goodness, close the preseason Thursday night in Jacksonville. They're 2-1 but who really cares about the record? There are still a bunch of unresolved issues -- most of them injury-related -- that need to be settled before the Sept. 9 opener against Miami. E-mail any questions to skinsmailbag@washingtontimes.com.
We start with some breaking news -- veteran defensive tackle Joe Salave'a has been released. The Redskins got down to 75 players by also waiving fullback Pete Schmitt and placing OL Ross Tucker and WR Jason McAddley on injured reserve. I expect both Tucker and McAddley to have injury settlement/releases. Salave'a was one of the players us media thought could be on his way out, but this was before he appeared to have a solid camp. Salave'a played 44 games in the last three seasons.
From Donald in Richmond:
What's the minimum Gibbs has to do this year to keep his job? Am I totally alone among Skins fans in thinking "the Eighties were fine and all, but what have you done for me lately?," etc.?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Coach Joe will be on the Redskins sidelines until he decides he wants to retire to North Carolina to spend time with the grand-babies. I would be shocked if he's pushed out, be it this year or next year. As for thinking about the glory days, you probably aren't alone. The 1980s doesn't buy you anything in 2007 and Joe would be the first to tell you that. But I also believe the natives are getting more restless with The Danny than they are with Gibbs.
From Donald Sanger in Falls Church:
Seems to me like the Skins have seen just about everything they need to see in the preseason. Shouldn't the NFL just cut it down from four games to three?
Ryan O'Halloran:
They should absolutely cut the preseason from four games to three games. The final game is meaningless for the front-line players. The NFL should then add a 17th regular season game and have each team play one international game, be it Europe, Canada, Mexico or in a U.S. city like Honolulu (my choice for a Redskins game). The fact the owners fleece fans in preseason games charging regular-season ticket and parking prices is absurd.
From Steve Koren in Rockville:
Were you surprised by any of this week's roster cuts, particularly Tucker and Butler?
Ryan O'Halloran:
A little surprised by Butler since I think he's a better cover cornerback than Ade Jimoh but the Redskins obviously have a soft spot for Jimoh and his special teams talent. Tucker went on IR with a neck problem but he wouldn't have made it anyway. As I said a few moments ago, Salave'a was a surprise because he was playing well in the games. That leaves Cornelius Griffin, Kedric Golston, Anthony Montgomery and Lorenzo Alexander as the top four defensive tackles. Ryan Boschetti's time may run out this week as well. If Griffin goes down, that position is in trouble.
From Kristen in Fairfax:
How do players get paid for training camp/preseason? Do they make more money on top of their big contracts?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Players get a stipend during the month of August but it's not part of their salary. The first "game checks" will be received Monday, Sept. 10. The envelopes are at the front desk of Redskin Park and I've never seen a player forget to pick up his envelope.
From Judson in Gaithersburg:
Isn't a no brainer to dump Shaun Suisham for Dave Rayner?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I had to look up Rayner because I didn't know much about him. He kicked last year for Green Bay and made 25 of 36 field goals. Supposedly, he's a good kickoff guy. His job may be in jeopardy if the Packers stick with rookie draft pick Mason Crosby of Colorado. But the Redskins are sticking with Suisham. He's had a solid preseason in field goals and kickoffs.
From Gary Fogel in Reston:
Should Jason Campbell play Thursday night against the Jaguars so he at least gets a little bit of work in before the opener, or is that just risking an even more serious injury?
Ryan O'Halloran:
This has been one of the big issues at the Park. My view: No way Campbell should play, even if he proves to be 100 percent. He played seven games last year. He played nearly 50 snaps against Tennessee and Pittsburgh earlier this month. LT Chris Samuels still isn't playing. The risk of losing Campbell to a blind-side hit is too great. Hall of Famer Sonny Jurgensen had the opposite view yesterday when talking to myself and another reporter. Sonny said Campbell should play and play a lot. Not just two three-and-outs. If the Redskins' o-line was intact, then I would agree with Sonny. But I wouldn't play Campbell.
From Irving in Georgia:
Now that camp is over how does the teams day to day schedule change chronologically?
Ryan O'Halloran:
This week is wacky with the Thursday game so I'll talk about next week. Monday -- practice/film (if the Redskins win the previous day, Gibbs usually gives them the day off; if the Redskins lose, they come in for film review and weight lifting); Tuesday -- day off (although a lot of players come to work out or watch film on their own); Wednesday -- start of the new work week (meetings most of the morning and practice from 2-4); Thursday -- practice from 12-2 with meetings before and after; Friday -- practice 12-1:30 with meetings; Saturday -- walk-through at Redskin Park before going to their team hotel near FedEx or flying to a road game.
From Gary Fogel:
Who are your picks going into the season as the Redskins best offensive and defensive players?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I'll stick with WR Santana Moss as the Redskins' top offensive player, followed by TE Chris Cooley. On defense, I'll go out on a limb -- S LaRon Landry.
From Tom in D.C.:
How optimistic should I be that the Redskins get off to a good start?
Ryan O'Halloran:
If most of their systems are go, the Redskins should get off to a solid start during the first six games. Anything less than 4-2 would be a disappointment. They should win home games against Miami (Week 1), the Giants (Week 3), Detroit (Week 5) and Arizona (Week 7). Their road games at Philadelphia (Week 2) and Green Bay (Week 6). ... After the Arizona game, things get tough -- at New England, at Jets, Philadelphia, at Dallas, at Tampa Bay.
That looks like all of the questions for this week. Our next chat will be Tuesday at 2 p.m.
]]>
Today's Live Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.13452007-08-14T18:23:12Z2007-08-14T19:51:53ZHey everybody. This is our third chat of the preseason and first since the Redskins actually played a game. They defeated the Titans 14-6 in a snoozer Saturday night in Nashville and have Pittsburgh at home this Saturday. A bunch...
SkinsLover:
Why is Ade Jimoh still on this team? I know they say because of his special teams play, but if that's all then he needs to be cut, and Mason kept, because Mason can play teams and RB . Where as Jimoh can't cover a bed.
Ryan O'Halloran:
Jimoh is a topic debated occasionally amongst the writers. Yes, he's a fine special teams player. But he absolutely, positively can't help the defense in any way. He showed that against the Giants in last year's season finale and was picked on by Tennessee Saturday night. A 53-man roster can afford a player or two who is only a special teams performer. If they think Jimoh is one of those guys, he'll be on the team despite his faults as a cornerback.
Donald Sanger, Falls Church
Given Gregg (the extra G is for Genius) Williams' history of making rookies prove themselves worthy of playing time, are you surprised LaRon Landry has already cracked the starting lineup?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I was surprised that Williams basically named Landry a starter way back in mini camp. But after watching Landry play last weekend, he is deserving of a starting spot right away and there's no need to transition him from reserve to starter in the first month, like the team did with Sean Taylor and Carlos Rogers. The coaches think that Landry is more developed than the aforementioned defensive players when they were rookies.
Irving in Georgia:
When does the team break camp? Are they still in the hotels now?
Ryan O'Halloran:
The team is still staying at the National Conference Center in Leesburg. I can't recall for sure but last year, they might have "broke" camp the Thursday before the second or third preseason game. Judging by the parking lot at the Park yesterday, it looks like a lot of veterans are driving themselves to and from NCC instead of riding the buses like the first week of camp.
John in Delaware
I'd like to know the real reason why the Skins cut Darnerien McCants from Delaware State a
couple years ago. He seemed to be in the right place to score TDs. I also, noticed that he
wasn't afraid to run over people if necessary. He had good size and
could separate behind the goal line even if he didn't run the perfect
route. He always found away to get open. That’s something they need
now. If it was because he didn't play special teams was not a good
enough reason to be released. Now, they are looking for height and
size and can't find what they need. What’s up?
Ryan O'Halloran:
The last topic I expected to be asked about is McCants. He was cut early in training camp two years ago and caught on with the Eagles. According to NFL.com, he's not currently on any team's roster. The reason McCants didn't stick with the Redskins is that he didn't play special teams and, frankly, wasn't that good. Yes, he has the kind of size the Redskins lack at that position but there might have also been some personality differences between him and the coaching staff.
Steve Koren, Rockville:
Is Todd Wade really the best answer at left guard?
Ryan O'Halloran:
As of right now, the Redskins think he's the answer and there isn't really a "best" answer on the roster. Wade has a pretty long leash and he's played exactly one half of live-action football this year at guard. The benefit of doubt suggests he gets at least two more games. If it's a failure, the Redskins' next option is Mike Pucillo. The key for Wade is leverage. Not to get too X-and-Oish on you guys, but Wade is a giant and he played a certain way against Tennessee that allowed Albert Haynesworth to get leverage and throw him to the ground. Wade needs to play more compact.
Trent:
It is well documented that Jason Campbell and Rocky Macintosh practically lived at Redskin Park in the offseason (kudos) and it appears to be paying off. They recognized that they are young and that with dedication they will find it easier to adjust to the pro level.
Why is it that we have not heard such reports about Carlos Rogers? He was drafted higher than both of those guys (more $$$), and his role on the defense is critical. Point blank, is Rogers a SLACKER?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Interesting point about Rogers. I saw him a lot at the Park this offseason and there weren't any whispers about him not being a dedicated worker. He did get more money than Campbell or McIntosh and he knows his role on the defense is vital to helping a pass defense that was stinky from September-December last year. I hesitate to call him a slacker, though. He just needs to play better. I don't think Jerry Gray will allow a guy to slack and then put him on the field.
Craig:
Are the Redskins coaches happy with the progress of Campbell?
Ryan O'Halloran:
They're pleased with Campbell's improvement, specifically in the technique areas. They can count on him to take the proper drops and think he's mechanically sound with his throwing motion. Campbell said yesterday he thought his decision making in the passing game was "on point." The constant third-and-long situations that came from a bad running game didn't help the offense or Campbell.
SkinsFan:
It looks like the injuries are starting to pile up across the league. Which team(s) has suffered the biggest loss(es) through the first couple weeks of camp?
Ryan O'Halloran:
The biggest injury loss was Anthony McFarland to the Colts defense. McFarland is out for the season and his big body will be missed because he clogged things up in the middle of the run defense, allowing Indianapolis' linebackers to make plays.
Tom:
Which team is your pick to be the NFL's worst team?
Ryan O'Halloran:
The Falcons are the favorites to get the No. 1 pick. I thought Atlanta would be bad even with Michael Vick playing quarterback. Now with Joey Harrington and Co. manning the position, the Birds might be beyond wretched. I think the Raiders will win a couple of games.
Gary Fogel, Reston
In a stunning development, I was actually able to find the Skins on the radio the other night. Then I spent a few quarters listening to Larry Michael do play-by-play. Yikes! Maybe that's why the radio signal is so weak. Any chance they'd bring back Frank Herzog and reunite the old gang again, or is that just wishful thinking?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I wonder if you're the same guy who started the same kind of discussion on the Redskins' chat board last week. Full disclosure: I haven't listened to Larry do one Redskins game since I've been at every Redskins game he's done and don't put the headphones on. I can imagine, though, his job is more difficult because he has to officiate between Sonny and Sam while trying to tell the listeners about the game.
Trent:
We saw Sean Taylor get involved on offense a few times in the past. Has there been anything like that at camp? Considerring the lack of WR depth, and the results Devin Hester is showing with the Bears, maybe Sean could add something to a sluggish passing game?
Ryan O'Halloran:
I haven't seen Taylor take any snaps on offense during training camp. Although Taylor is probably the team's best athlete and could help the offense in spot duty, my guess is that the coaches want him to concentrate on one thing (improving as a safety) than spending practice time on the offensive side. What would be very cool is using Taylor on kickoff returns. That would be a sight. It won't happen, though.
Andrew, Indianapolis
Is there a consideration for a #2 WR to emerge from a third of fourth stringer as a reward? Mike Espy continues to look good on second and third string...will that be enough to earn a shot at starting for a preseason game?
Ryan O'Halloran:
Right now, Antwaan Randle El is the No. 2 receiver, but to adjust your question a little bit, I think the opportunity is there for a James Thrash or Mike Espy to move ahead of Brandon Lloyd if No. 85's poor shin splints don't heal and/or he again doesn't produce. Lloyd might be practicing later today. It would behoove him to suck it up and get on the field.
Ryan O'Halloran:
The 'In' box is officially 'Out' of questions. Thanks for the questions. I'll be back next Tuesday at 2 p.m.
]]>
Today's Live Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.12502007-08-07T18:49:31Z2007-08-07T19:44:24ZRyan O'Halloran Hey folks. We're in between practices at Redskin Park. This is my fourth training camp and it is probably the second hottest day since 2004 -- the only one that felt worse was the opening day last year....
Ryan O'Halloran
Hey folks. We're in between practices at Redskin Park. This is my fourth training camp and it is probably the second hottest day since 2004 -- the only one that felt worse was the opening day last year. The Redskins went for 65 minutes this morning and might go for only an hour this afternoon. We'll get started at 2 p.m.
Ryan O'Halloran
OK, let's get started. The Redskins are in Day 12 of training camp and they start the preseason schedule Saturday night in Nashville against the Tennessee Titans. I'll be answering questions for the next hour and I have several already ready in the mailbag. But if you want to have a question about the Redskins or the NFL, shoot me an email at skinsmailbag@washingtontimes.com
Ryan: How's Clinton Portis going to be in game condition if he doesn't play? Also I heard Earnest Byner on the Doc Walker show, and it sounds like he's frustrated with CP. Is that the feel at the Park? I also heard Clinton say that he's tired of all the long faces around there about him not playing.
Ryan O'Halloran
That's a good point about Portis. We have to give him the benefit of the doubt and think he came to camp in good condition. He has been limited to riding the stationary bike and standing around during practice. I'm sure he's doing plenty of work behind closed doors. As for Byner, I think the entire offensive staff is probably frustrated because Al Saunders wants to use Portis has a workhorse back and right now, it doesn't appear as if he'll be up to the task. As for Clinton, take anything and everything he says with a big grain of salt.
Ryan: What your thoughts on the length of the preseason? Should it be shorter with an additional regular season game? Does it come down to economics for the teams?
Ryan O'Halloran The preseason is way too long in terms of time before the first preseason game and number of preseason games. The only sports that do the preseason right are the NBA and NHL -- a half-dozen games and then into the regular season. I think eventually the preseason will be three games with 17 regular season games (8 home, 8 road, 1 international). The economics now are two home preseason gates, which feature the same prices as a real game. The league would have to make sure teams had two preseason home games every other year.
Ryan: Any early word on the prospects and performance of Alex Buzbee
(Georgetown) Chris Wilson (from Canada) or Anthony Montgomery the big
tackle?
Artis JonesRyan O'Halloran Defensive boss Gregg Williams said Buzbee is coming along nicely after a rough start to camp when he discovered quickly that training camp is different than mini camp. I still expect Buzbee to be a practice squad candidate. Wilson is a part of the defensive line group that faces long odds. Finally, Montgomery also earned Williams' praise this morning -- he'll definitely be a part of the DT rotation if he keeps up his solid play.
Ryan: I was wondering if you knew why Jason Campbell did not play any of the 11 on 11 portion of the scrimmage. I would think he good use as many reps as he could get. No fear of injury because you couldn’t hit the QB. Didn’t need to see Brunell that much. We know what he can do. Also, I didn’t enjoy watching Demetrius Evans, our supposed quality backup end, get blown off the ball ten yards on a sweep by a rookie left tackle. Wilson, RichmondRyan O'Halloran: The company line from the Redskins on Campbell not playing the Ravens in an 11-vs.-11 situation is that they wanted to get the other quarterbacks work with the other reserves. I don't think his not playing is that big a deal -- he needs reps against live competition so it will be interesting to see how much he plays against Tennessee. On Demetric Evans, I didn't see the play you're referring to -- sorry.
Ryan: Is Sean Taylor going to demand Ed Reed, type of money when the skins, negotiate with Drew Rosenhaus, afterwards are the skins going to have enough cap room to extend JC's contract because simple fact is they can't afford to lose him to free agency. Armen, AnnandaleRyan O'Halloran:Reed signed a seven-year, $40 million extension with $15 million guaranteed last year with Baltimore. It's safe to assume that contract will be the starting point when Rosenhaus sits down with the Redskins -- probably after this season. The Campbell situation is interesting. If he has a good 2007 season, they will probably extend him to keep him off the market for foreseeable future. But I doubt they have the cap room to extend both players in one off-season.
RyanI was thinking about trying to catch a Redskins road game at some point this year, get a taste of what the scene is like at another NFL stadium. Based on your experience covering games around the league, which one would you recommend I try to get to?
Steve Koren, RockvilleRyan O'Halloran:I'll be making my first trip to Lambeau Field in October so that would be the one to recommend although I think tickets to a Packers game could be costly. Among the stadiums I've been to, my favorites (in no order) are Philadelphia, Chicago, Kansas City, Seattle and Tampa Bay.
Ryan: We haven't heard too much about the Skins D-Line this year; do you think the old vets will get most of the playing time this season or will the young players get more of a look? Are there any young players on the defensive line who has caught your eye so far? AlexRyan O'Halloran:I haven't explored the defensive line issue just yet because I want to see some preseason games before making an early judgement. Watching practice, though, I've been impressed by Cornelius Griffin and Joe Salave'a and think the young guys are making some progress. Ideally, the Redskins would like Griffin and Kedric Golston to start at tackle, Phil Daniels and Andre Carter to start at end. Buzbee does have a pretty good motor and might be in the future plans. If the DL struggles in September, you'll be hearing a lot about it.
Ryan: Do you think some of the injuries in the preseason can be attributed to the new offseason programs that substantially limit the ability for players to fully recover from one season to another? Isn’t it more of a year-round season now with OTAs and mini-camps?
Ryan O'Halloran:That would start an interesting discussion in any NFL locker room. Last year, some Redskins veterans thought the team's intense off-season program sapped them heading into the season. Joe Gibbs adjusted the program, letting players work out on their own. Football is definitely year-round and I think there is something to be said that too much is required of the players when a guy like Portis develops tendonitis less than a week into camp.
Ryan: Do we have to listen to Bryant Gumbel for another year on the NFL Network? One word, awful!
Ryan O'Halloran: Unfortunately, Gumbel is back for another season. I didn't watch the Saints-Steelers game the other night but I'm told Gumbel was more tolerable because he let Cris Collinsworth do most of the heavy lifting. Good news for Redskins fans, though -- Gumbel isn't doing Saturday's game against the Titans. Some guy named Spero Dedes is doing play by play and Marshall Faulk is the analyst.
Ryan Was it really 140 degrees on the field in Baltimore the other day for the Skins-Ravens scrimmage? I know NFL teams take precautions to prevent dehydration, but aren't they just asking for a Korey Stringer-like catastrophe when they insist on playing meaningless scrimmages in the middle of the afternoon in August? Gary Fogel, RestonRyan O'Halloran: Yep, it was 141 on the FieldTurf according to the Ravens public relations staff. When the heat becomes that excessive, my first reaction is that they are asking for trouble. But since the Stringer death six years ago, the NFL has gone great lengths to make sure there isn't a repeat. The Redskins cut short their first practice this morning and their practice this afternoon and the St. Louis Rams have moved several practices to their indoor facility because of the heat.
RyanTake your pick: Which knee injury should the Redskins be most concerned about: Clinton Portis, Chris Samuels or Randy Thomas? Donald Sanger, Falls ChurchRyan O'Halloran: Samuels without a doubt. If Portis is shelved for a long period of time, the Redskins' coaches trust that Ladell Betts can fill the void. If Thomas goes down at right guard, Mike Pucillo can be serviceable if pressed into starting for 2-3 games. But without Samuels protecting Campbell's blind-side? Yikes. Rookie Stephon Heyer is running with the first team now and veteran Jason Fabini has a groin problem. My guess is if Samuels develops a long-term problem, the Redskins would move Todd Wade from left guard to left tackle.
The mailbag is officially empty. Appreciate the questions sent in. I'll be back next Tuesday at 2 p.m. to review the Tennessee game and look ahead to the Pittsburgh game.
]]>
Today's Live Chattag:video1.washingtontimes.com,2007:/redskinschat//24.11562007-07-31T18:39:41Z2007-07-31T19:59:09ZGreetings folks for our first Redskins Live Chat. I have several questions ready to be answered but there's room for more so fire me an email at skinsmailbag@washingtontimes.com. We'll get started at 2 p.m. Hey everybody. It's time to get...twtsports
We've been hearing a lot about the rookie free agent DE from G'town, Alex Buzbee. I'm just curious about how he's faring in training camp and if there is any feedback about him from his teammates and the coaching staff. If he doesn't make it to the active roster, is he a lock for the practice squad?
Hussam
Hussam: Buzbee has looked good in the early days of training camp. The way he moves through the tackling dummies during individual drills shows he's got quickness. Gregg Williams was asked about yesterday and said like all rookies, he's going through the transition of working against veterans with the pads on. The best-case scenario because Buzbee is an end is practice squad.
Ryan: OK, so this is a *Redskins* live chat... but what do you think of the Vikings?
Robert, Springfield
Robert: Ah, the Vikings. My boyhood team and a team I still follow. It's not going to be a pretty season in Minnesota, chiefly because of the quarterback situation. The decision to trade Daunte Culpepper will really haunt Brad "Mr. Football" Childress this year. Tarvaris Jackson is a second-year player who played I-AA football and the transition is even greater for a player like that. He simply isn't ready to start. The Vikings' lone hope is that they create a lot of turnovers and that running backs Adrian Peterson and Chester Taylor gobble up the yards.
Ryan: Can you comment on the impact Fred Smoot will have returning to the Redskins? Why do you think it didn’t work in Minnesota?
I think Smoot, back with the Redskins after two forgettable (on the field) and memorable (off the field) seasons with the Vikings will have an impact with the Redskins because he's an upgrade over Kenny "Toast" Wright, the team's sometimes No. 2/sometimes No. 3 corner last year. As for what happened in Minnesota, Smoot couldn't stay healthy and didn't really fit into the Vikings' style of soft coverage. He's more of a jam-you-at-the-line and aggressive corner.
Ryan: Joe Gibbs' coaching comeback is now in its fourth year. How much more of this does he have left in him, especially if the Redskins don't make the playoffs this season?
-- Gary Fogel, Reston
Gary: I might in the minority here but I think Gibbs will coach the duration of his contract (2007 and 2008). He committed to this for five years and five years only and I don't think he wants to leave the team until they're headed in the right direction. Granted, they may still stink after the 2008 season but at least Joe can tell himself he's tried for five years. If they go 7-9 or 8-8 this year, Joe will come back because he thinks the team is close to making the playoffs.
$17 million guaranteed? That's a lot for a rookie who's not even guaranteed of a starting job! There's no way LaRon Landry isn't one of Gregg Williams' starting 11, is there?
-- Donald Sanger, Falls Church
That's a lot of money for a guy who hasn't played a down in the NFL yet but that's the going rate for the No. 6 pick. But unlike past rookies, I think Landry is semi-guaranteed of starting the opener if he makes up for the four days of camp he missed. Gregg Williams intimated as much during rookie camp that he expects Landry's transition to be quicker than Sean Taylor and Carlos Rogers.
What changes do Gregg Williams and the Redskins defense have to make this year to be a more effective unit?
Williams said yesterday what the players have said the entire off-season -- the Redskins are banking on the simple is better. He has scaled back some of the vaunted "packages" that confused opponents in 2004 and 2005 but only confused the Redskins defense last year when they were terrible. We won't know for sure what this entails until the first regular season game but I expect more blitzing once the corners prove they can shut down receivers in man coverage.
What team will be the biggest disappointment this year (playoff team last year) and the biggest surprise this year (sub-.500 last year)?
Biggest disappointment: It probably be classified as such because they were 8-8 last year, but the Giants are in for a steep decline. Strahan's hold out is just another thing going wrong for Big Blue and the list includes Tiki Barber's retirement and Eli Manning's inconsistency. Among the other 2006 playoff teams, expect New England, the Jets, Indianapolis, San Diego, Philadelphia, Dallas, Chicago, New Orleans and Seattle to all be there.
Biggest surprise: I think Arizona could make some noise because the Cardinals will be able to score. Now if they can just make some defensive stops.
Ryan: How do you think Cris Samuels being injured will affect the chemistry being created along the line? If he is out for four weeks, can he be ready for the season?
Andrew, Silver Spring
Andrew: Specifically, Samuels' injury could hurt the chemistry development with new left guard Todd Wade. Wade's new to the position and was just four days into working with Samuels in full uniform and almost-full contact. If he comes back four weeks from today, that will be two days before the preseason finale against Jacksonville (Aug. 30). I doubt he plays in that game. The season opener is in 40 days (Sept. 9) so they have some time to play with. I think he'll be ready for the opener.
Who do you think will have the biggest impact on their new team this year….McGahee in Baltimore, Green in Miami or Lewis in Cleveland?
Trent Green in Miami will have the biggest impact on his team because he is a big-time upgrade from the cast of characters the Dolphins started last year. That probably won't translate into a lot more wins, though. Same goes for Jamal Lewis in Cleveland. Willis McGahee will have a big chance in Baltimore to improve the offense. But come playoff time, the Ravens will still need to use the forward pass occasionally.
Hey Ryan, Even though the Nats are pathetic, baseball is still dominating the news these days (Barry Bonds, Cal's HOF induction, today's trade deadline)... Are there any die-hard baseball fans on the Skins, and what teams do they like? I seem to remember hearing Renaldo Wynn is a big White Sox fan.
-- Steve Koren, Rockville
Steve: Wynn is probably the most outspoken baseball fan on the team -- the one who shows his allegiance by wearing hats and jerseys. A majority of the team are more into their college teams and the NBA. Speaking of the Nationals, it will be interesting to see down the line when -- or if -- they're in contention in the new ballpark how much coverage that will take away from Redskins training camp.
Who from this year’s draft will have an immediate impact?
For the Redskins: Aside from Landry, I wouldn't expect any of the drafted players to play a big role, except on special teams. I thought TE Tyler Ecker was a solid choice to make the team as a blocker but his groin injury might hurt his chances. LBs Dallas Sartz and H.B. Blades have missed time because of injury. QB Jordan Palmer seems ticketed for the practice squad unless his brother Carson has some pull and Cincinnati claims him off waivers in September.
For the NFL: Buffalo's Marshawn Lynch is replacing Willis McGahee as the Bills' workhorse running back and will get every chance to win Rookie of the Year. Chicago TE Greg Olsen could become an instant target for Rex Grossman.
I saw Gregg Williams say yesterday he thinks Sean Taylor is the "best" athlete he's seen. Does he break out this year?
If Sean Taylor ever ran for political office, he should hire Williams as his PR director. I asked Williams point-blank yesterday whether Taylor needs to become a better tackler and he naturally spun his answer by saying his tackle totals have increased every year. But thankfully for Taylor, the league doesn't keep "missed tackles." The next step for Taylor -- the best way to get his next contract -- is by creating turnovers and scoring touchdowns.
OK, that's look like all of the questions and I have to run out to the Park for another practice. Appreciate the questions and talk to everybody next Tuesday -- Ryan
]]>