<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/"
     version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</title>
      <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R</link>
      <description>Table of Contents for Communication Theory. List of articles from both the latest and EarlyView issues.</description>
      <language>en-US</language>
      <copyright>© International Communication Association</copyright>
      <managingEditor>wileyonlinelibrary@wiley.com (Wiley Online Library)</managingEditor>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 18:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 18:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>Atypon® Literatum™</generator>
      <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
      <ttl>10080</ttl>
      <dc:title>Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</dc:title>
      <dc:publisher>Wiley</dc:publisher>
      <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
      <atom:link href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R"
                 rel="self"
                 type="application/atom+xml"/>
      
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12114?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12114</guid>
         <title>Theorizing the Relationship Between Gender and Health Through a Case Study of Nepalese Street‐Based Female Sex Workers</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 388-406, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description>
The environmental‐structural communication approach attempts to reduce the prevalence of individual health risks to female sex workers' (FSW) through community‐level interventions. However, I argue that this approach narrowly defines health and such communication efforts are focused on changing the work environment to facilitate the reduction of individual risk prevalence. Based on 35 in‐depth interviews, I use lived experiences of FSWs as a case study to discuss the relationships between gender and health. The intersectionality framework allows health communication efforts to incorporate analysis of multiple and simultaneous influences of gender relations, gender identities, and class on the transmission of health risks. These intersections draw our attention to think differently about inequalities and vulnerabilities that shape health and health behaviors of FSWs.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;p&gt;The environmental-structural communication approach attempts to reduce the prevalence of individual health risks to female sex workers' (FSW) through community-level interventions. However, I argue that this approach narrowly defines health and such communication efforts are focused on changing the work environment to facilitate the reduction of individual risk prevalence. Based on 35 in-depth interviews, I use lived experiences of FSWs as a case study to discuss the relationships between gender and health. The intersectionality framework allows health communication efforts to incorporate analysis of multiple and simultaneous influences of gender relations, gender identities, and class on the transmission of health risks. These intersections draw our attention to think differently about inequalities and vulnerabilities that shape health and health behaviors of FSWs.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Iccha Basnyat
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Theorizing the Relationship Between Gender and Health Through a Case Study of Nepalese Street‐Based Female Sex Workers</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12114</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12114</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12114?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12118?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12118</guid>
         <title>Language Mediation as Communication System</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 367-387, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description>
Abstract
Language mediation is employed as a possible solution for problems of migrants' inclusion in institutional services, within multilingual and multicultural societies. Interpreting Studies has highlighted that language mediation is coordination of social interactions and social construction of narratives. This paper explains language mediation using Luhmann's theory of communication systems, in particular the concepts of self‐reference, reflexivity, function, structure, and structural coupling. Language mediation is observed as a self‐referential communication system fulfilling the function of promoting participation and new narratives through reflexive coordination. In particular, the concept of structural coupling explains how language mediation can enhance change within other communication systems, promoting dialogue across difference. Language mediation, however, can also assume a hierarchical structure, which creates marginalization and ethnocentrism.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;h2&gt;Abstract&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Language mediation is employed as a possible solution for problems of migrants' inclusion in institutional services, within multilingual and multicultural societies. Interpreting Studies has highlighted that language mediation is coordination of social interactions and social construction of narratives. This paper explains language mediation using Luhmann's theory of communication systems, in particular the concepts of self-reference, reflexivity, function, structure, and structural coupling. Language mediation is observed as a self-referential communication system fulfilling the function of promoting participation and new narratives through reflexive coordination. In particular, the concept of structural coupling explains how language mediation can enhance change within other communication systems, promoting dialogue across difference. Language mediation, however, can also assume a hierarchical structure, which creates marginalization and ethnocentrism.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Claudio Baraldi
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Language Mediation as Communication System</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12118</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12118</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12118?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12119?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12119</guid>
         <title>Theorizing Provocation Narratives as Communication Strategies</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 329-346, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description>
Despite multiple uses, the concept of provocation is undertheorized and underinvestigated. Theorizing provocation narratives as communication strategies, this article shows that what is at stake in provocations are crucial issues of intentionality, accountability, and blame. While some provocations elicit reactions that are beneficial to the parties involved, others may incite violence. The second part of our study focuses on the latter because of their potential for shifting blame to victims. To deconstruct the mechanism by which provocation introduces this type of bias, we use Labov's method of narrative analysis and apply it to two news items. We conclude on how provocation can serve as a theoretical framework and methodological tool for narrative analysis in many communication contexts and fields.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;p&gt;Despite multiple uses, the concept of provocation is undertheorized and underinvestigated. Theorizing provocation narratives as communication strategies, this article shows that what is at stake in provocations are crucial issues of intentionality, accountability, and blame. While some provocations elicit reactions that are beneficial to the parties involved, others may incite violence. The second part of our study focuses on the latter because of their potential for shifting blame to victims. To deconstruct the mechanism by which provocation introduces this type of bias, we use Labov's method of narrative analysis and apply it to two news items. We conclude on how provocation can serve as a theoretical framework and methodological tool for narrative analysis in many communication contexts and fields.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Sandrine Boudana, 
Elad Segev
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Theorizing Provocation Narratives as Communication Strategies</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12119</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12119</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12119?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12120?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12120</guid>
         <title>Breaking Away From Charisma? The Celebrity Industry's Contradictory Connection to Charismatic Authority</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 347-366, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description>
Some scholars label celebrities as “charismatic,” while others avoid that Weberian term, deeming it inappropriate in the context of celebrity culture. None, however, offers a systematic account of the relationship between Weberian charisma and celebrity. To this task, this article moves beyond the semantics toward a systematic analysis and comparison of the logics guiding charismatic and celebrity dynamics. I argue that charisma and celebrity represent distinct and even partly contradictory logics of social distinction, but that they nonetheless substantially intertwine and coextend in society, which renders their interaction ambiguous, conflictual, and creative of new social forms. This social‐ontological conceptualization provides the now‐lacking theoretical foundation for empirical studies into the many complex interactions between charismatic and celebrity dynamics throughout society.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;p&gt;Some scholars label celebrities as “charismatic,” while others avoid that Weberian term, deeming it inappropriate in the context of celebrity culture. None, however, offers a systematic account of the relationship between Weberian charisma and celebrity. To this task, this article moves beyond the semantics toward a systematic analysis and comparison of the logics guiding charismatic and celebrity dynamics. I argue that charisma and celebrity represent distinct and even partly contradictory logics of social distinction, but that they nonetheless substantially intertwine and coextend in society, which renders their interaction ambiguous, conflictual, and creative of new social forms. This social-ontological conceptualization provides the now-lacking theoretical foundation for empirical studies into the many complex interactions between charismatic and celebrity dynamics throughout society.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Eric Cornelis Hendriks
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>Breaking Away From Charisma? The Celebrity Industry's Contradictory Connection to Charismatic Authority</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12120</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12120</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12120?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12121?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12121</guid>
         <title>Critiquing Utopia, Ubiquity, and Pressure in Fossil Fuel(ed) Rhetoric</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 409-410, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Catalina M. de Onís
</dc:creator>
         <category>BOOK REVIEW</category>
         <dc:title>Critiquing Utopia, Ubiquity, and Pressure in Fossil Fuel(ed) Rhetoric</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12121</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12121</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12121?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12122?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12122</guid>
         <title>French Perspectives on International Language Primacy: The Shifting Prestige and Weight of a Language</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 407-408, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Paolo Sigismondi
</dc:creator>
         <category>BOOK REVIEW</category>
         <dc:title>French Perspectives on International Language Primacy: The Shifting Prestige and Weight of a Language</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12122</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12122</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12122?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12126?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDate>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 -0700</prism:coverDisplayDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12126</guid>
         <title>The Subject of Slavery in Translation: Between Jack Qiu and Simone Browne</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, Volume 27, Issue 4, Page 411-413, November 2017. </description>
         <dc:description/>
         <content:encoded/>
         <dc:creator>
Victoria Netanus Grubbs
</dc:creator>
         <category>BOOK REVIEW</category>
         <dc:title>The Subject of Slavery in Translation: Between Jack Qiu and Simone Browne</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12126</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12126</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12126?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>BOOK REVIEW</prism:section>
         <prism:volume>27</prism:volume>
         <prism:number>4</prism:number>
      </item>
      <item>
         <link>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12123?af=R</link>
         <pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
         <dc:date>2017-09-14T12:00:00-07:00</dc:date>
         <source url="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682885?af=R">Wiley: Communication Theory: Table of Contents</source>
         <prism:coverDate/>
         <prism:coverDisplayDate/>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">10.1111/comt.12123</guid>
         <title>The Value of Questions in Organizing: Reconceptualizing Contributions to Online Public Information Goods</title>
         <description>Communication Theory, EarlyView. </description>
         <dc:description>
In contrast to previous research that treats question‐askers as free‐riders, this article conceptualizes questions and information requests as important forms of contribution to generating online public information goods. By requesting information, individuals make visible an informational need, calling for attention from those who may be able to fulfill that need and alerting those who share that need. Communicating questions can result in groups forming around particular shared interests, giving rise to permeable group boundaries that distinguish the interested from others. Such groups continue or even grow if new information needs are introduced. Once all information needs are fulfilled, the group will eventually dissolve, leaving their informational assets as public goods for the whole community.
</dc:description>
         <content:encoded>
&lt;p&gt;In contrast to previous research that treats question-askers as free-riders, this article conceptualizes questions and information requests as important forms of contribution to generating online public information goods. By requesting information, individuals make visible an informational need, calling for attention from those who may be able to fulfill that need and alerting those who share that need. Communicating questions can result in groups forming around particular shared interests, giving rise to permeable group boundaries that distinguish the interested from others. Such groups continue or even grow if new information needs are introduced. Once all information needs are fulfilled, the group will eventually dissolve, leaving their informational assets as public goods for the whole community.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
         <dc:creator>
Leila Bighash, 
Poong Oh, 
Janet Fulk, 
Peter Monge
</dc:creator>
         <category>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</category>
         <dc:title>The Value of Questions in Organizing: Reconceptualizing Contributions to Online Public Information Goods</dc:title>
         <dc:identifier>10.1111/comt.12123</dc:identifier>
         <prism:publicationName>Communication Theory</prism:publicationName>
         <prism:doi>10.1111/comt.12123</prism:doi>
         <prism:url>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/comt.12123?af=R</prism:url>
         <prism:section>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</prism:section>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
