Red Stars Over Hollywood – Download mp3

In the mid 1940s Myron C. Fagan launched an assault on what he believed to be a communist (ie, Jewish Bolshevik) infiltration of America via Hollywood and Broadway.  Fagan’s efforts were marked by a spoken word album called Red Stars Over Hollywood, in which he exaustively documented the repeated efforts of individuals and groups that he claimed were involved in subversive activity within the United States. Fagan’s expose led to the The Committee on Un-American Activities investigated communist infiltration of the motion picture industry in 1947. Most will remember this often debated time in as the McCarthy, “2nd Red Scare” era of American history.

From Wikipedia -
Myron Coureval Fagan (31 October 1887 – 12 May 1972) was a Jewish American writer, producer and director for film and theatre. He arrived on Broadway in 1907, where he quickly became one of the youngest playwrights in American Theater. Over the years, he worked in the theater with such luminaries as Alla Nazimova, Douglas Fairbanks, and John Barrymore. He also directed plays for the top producers of the era such as Charles Frohman, David Belasco and others. Fagan also became the dramatic editor of The Associated Newspapers. Many of the actors including Humphrey Bogart, Brian Donlevy and Robert Ryan whom Fagin directed or who appeared in his plays or screen adaptions later became stars in Hollywood.

Well, it seems that  these days nothing has changed other than the Jews who run Hollywood and the Jews behind all major anti-gun legislation since 1968 are more assure of their control over their perspective industries. They can now can openly push for un-American activities such as preventing American citizens from protecting themselves using today popular actors like Beyonce and Jamie Fox as mouthpieces for anti-2nd Amendment front organizations.

Luckily, there has been a growing backlash against these hypocritical clowns and the Hollywood industry. I do recommend boycotting Hollywood altogether, but if you feel the need to contribute to an industry dedicated to the degeneration of society, then at the very least consider boycotting and the works of the following Hollywood Gun-Grabbers For Zion:

Jamie Foxx, Jason Bateman, Paul Rudd, Beyonce Knowles, Amy Poehler, Jeremy Renner, Amanda Pete, Jon Hamm, Carla Gugino, Jessica Alba, Reese Witherspoon, Rashida Jones, Will Ferrell, Sarah Silverman, Aziz Ansari, John Legend, Olivia Munn, Kathryn Hahn, Julianne Moore, Busy Phillips, Jennifer Garner, John Slattery, Nick Offermann, Chris Rock, Cameron Diaz, Courtney Cox, Christina Applegate, Zooey Deschanel, Steve Carrell, Adam Scott, Ellen Degeneres, Mark Ruffalo, Kate Hudson, Peter Dinklage, Jennifer Aniston, Elizabeth Banks, Max Greenfeld,Gwyneth Paltrow, Conan Obrien, Aubrey Plaza, Debra Messing, Megan Mullaly, Jennifer Westfeldt, Selena Gomez, Michelle Williams, Chris Paul, Victor Cruz

Burn Hollywood burn!

Popular actor and TIME Magazine’s “Man of the Year” delivers a noteworthy performance while exploiting victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting

President Obama and his hypocritical Hollywood anti-gun coalition are attacking the rights of law abiding citizens to protect themselves. Watch the video below exposing these clowns acting out an endless stream of horrific gun violence in their movies and teevee shows as they call for regular citizen’s rights to be curtailed. Aside the fact that these “stars” are probably all gun owners themselves, I believe that the armed body guards and the private security services that they employ will likely be exempt from all of the new regulations that they are calling for.

All it takes is just two minutes of basic research to figure out that the tiny elite that run Hollywood are part of the same tiny elite that are behind all of the major gun control legislation since 1968.

I recommend boycotting Hollywood altogether, but if you feel the need to contribute to an industry dedicated to the degeneration of society, then at the very least consider boycotting the works of the following Hollywood Gun-Grabbers For Zion:

Jamie Foxx, Jason Bateman, Paul Rudd, Beyonce Knowles, Amy Poehler, Jeremy Renner, Amanda Pete, Jon Hamm, Carla Gugino, Jessica Alba, Reese Witherspoon, Rashida Jones, Will Ferrell, Sarah Silverman, Aziz Ansari, John Legend, Olivia Munn, Kathryn Hahn, Julianne Moore, Busy Phillips, Jennifer Garner, John Slattery, Nick Offermann, Chris Rock, Cameron Diaz, Courtney Cox, Christina Applegate, Zooey Deschanel, Steve Carrell, Adam Scott, Ellen Degeneres, Mark Ruffalo, Kate Hudson, Peter Dinklage, Jennifer Aniston, Elizabeth Banks, Max Greenfeld,Gwyneth Paltrow, Conan Obrien, Aubrey Plaza, Debra Messing, Megan Mullaly, Jennifer Westfeldt, Selena Gomez, Michelle Williams, Chris Paul, Victor Cruz

Burn Hollywood burn!

An Evening Art Discussion Part 1-Mainstream Media Cesspool Redux

Former Oracle Broadcasting hosts Kyle Hunt of Star Theory Radio, and Mike Sledge of Deconstructions Live (now on Renegade Broadcasting) revisit a 2006 art and photography controversy.

An Evening Art Discussion Part 2-The Origins of Subversion and Decline of Western Society

Kyle Hunt and Mike Sledge continue their discussion on art and social degeneration of the United States and Western society. They trace the origins of post-modern art to the Weimar Republic and pre-WWII Germany, the Frankfurt School (Institute for Social Research) and the Office of Inter-American Affairs. Featuring the art of Alfred Flechtheim, Louise Fishman, Otto Dix, MTV, Sharif Hamza and others.

 Israel Apologist Bingo is a fun game that you can play during Operation Pillar of Cloud, the latest  military campaign against the people of Gaza by Israeli Defense Force (IDF). Try it with your family, friends and co-workers today!

Download mp3

This audio file, documenting the mainstream media news coverage from Election Night 2008, is critical listening. Consider this information as you sit glued to your TeeVee set Tuesday waiting for the results from Election Night 2012.

Under The Radar Media

We are but days away from Election Day 2012. Now that all of the ridiculous election pageantry is over, Americans will finally get to choose whether to re-elect President Barack Obama, or vote him out and choose to elect Mitt Romney as President of the United States of America.

Tensions are running high among the populace. There seems to a growing unease as politics seems to be on the lips of eveyone, and people who are normally better versed in NFL and Dancing With The Stars are suddenly armchair political experts.

A growing number of Americans are aware that there are very serious problems with the American political establishment but are  either unable, or  unwilling to accept even the most basic, fundamental problem of the system. The interesting thing is that the problem is a very simple, easily identifiable one,  however the solution has proven to be an extremely elusive one.

Speaking on internet radio back in September of 2010, independent Argentinian researcher, essayist and lecturer, Adrian Salbuchi made a short but poignant analysis on the fundamental problem of the American political system.

I think that we are reaching the point where are a series of acid tests, and one of those acid tests is that you cannot be discreet, nice, lukewarm, ahh…diplomat, about…for example, certain key questions. One of which is the Jewish question.

I know it’s going to bring whoever does that a whole lot of trouble, I know that you’re going to be fired at. They’re gonna really say everything; that you’re an anti-semite, that you’re a monster, that you’re Nazi, etc, etc, etc, etc. But if do not squarely address the Jewish Zionist problem, you cannot understand modern history, and you cannot understand modern politics.

So if you are missing such a key element like that, it’s like trying to buy a car with no engine. It might look like a car, it might be very shiny, it might have very pretty lights, but it’s not going to take you anywhere.

Whether you agree or disagree with this analysis, the fact remains that Salbuchi’s assessment of the fundamental issue just also happens one of the most taboo subjects in not only the US, but throughout all of Western Society.

If one were to perform even a cursory examination of the two presidential candidates, one could come to the conclusion that Romney and Obama appear to represent two factions within the ruling establishments in America: Wall Street and Hollywood.  Wall Street and Hollywood are, without question, the two epicenters of Jewish power in America.

The top operators of  Wall Street and Hollywood appear to be engaged in a power struggle of sorts over who they want to “act” as President of the United States.

In the 2008 Presidential Elections, Wall Street appeared to have backed both then Senator Barack Obama and Mitt Romney, however, Wall Street now appears to have ditched President Obama in favor of Mitt Romney. Why is that?

The Wall Street crowd behind Mitt Romney also includes longtime business associate and friend, Benjamin Netanyahu and the  warmongering, Jewish supremacist Likud Party of Israel .

The Hollywood crowd, which includes industry bigwigs, the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender establishment (LGBT), various civil rights and minority groups, influential, iconic celebrities such Madonna,  Jewish comedienne Sara Silverman and Oprah Winfrey, along with a host of  other celebrities and the ever-important Holocaust® Orthodoxy establishment are firmly entrenched in the camp of President Obama.

It should go without saying that Wall Street and the American political establishment have extremely close ties, and even a revolving door relationship of sorts. It is however, worth noting that Hollywood has also had a close relationship with the American political establishment as well; going back to the governorship of California and presidency of Ronald Reagan, and even as far back as The Holocaust®.

Another overlapping interest between the opposing parties/factions that both Wall Street and Hollywood share, along with the Republican and Democrat parties is the unquestioning, unwavering support for the Jewish state of Israel. On the issue of support for Israel (ie; billions of dollars of free money provided by taxpayers), both Obama and Romney are in complete agreement.  This fact is displayed in the diagram below. Feel free to click on the image for an interactive map to explore even more connections and overlapping relationships.

Click image for interactive map to explore even more connections

Haim Saban and Sheldon Adelson, with Adelson being the more mentioned of the two by the mainstream media, are but two Jewish billionaires that are active in within the American political establishment. Even more Jewish billionaire connections to the American political establishment can be found at the article “Jewish Money Tabs Romney & Obama.”

The 2012 Presidential Election Debate (Part 1)

Under The Radar Media

So what did you think of tonight’s first presidential debate/reality show? The two candidates sure did come across as awful convincing and quite caring about the concerns of the average American citizen didn’t they?

It’s obvious that the economy is the most important issue on the table at this time, so it goes without saying that this key domestic issue will dominate the first debate, if not all three of them. The candidates and the media-sponsored talking heads are perfectly comfortable in discussing taxes, tax cuts, job creation,  Medicare/Medicaid etc, but there is no point in debating the current state of the economy  if none of the key fundamental causes of the problems aren’t going to be addressed.

Another issue that won’t be discussed is a topic that the majority of Americans simply will not face;  the issue of Jewish/Zionist dominance of the American political system. In fact, on December 4, 2009, the Israeli news service Ha’aretz reported that “every appointee to the American government must endure a thorough background check by the American Jewish community.”

This stipulation is not limited to just US-Israeli policy; it has enumerable effects on both US domestic as well as US foreign policy issues. Perhaps some of the effects of those issue will be addressed over the next few posts.

What’s also most interesting is that the debate moderator Jim Lehrer, had to try to create and present a contrast between Obama and Romney. The not-so-dirty-secret is how similar these two clowns are on most if not all of the key issues that are likely to be addressed during the debates.

“In American politics we have several parties included under the blanket words “Democratic” and “Republican.” In oversimplified terms, as I have said, were the party of the middle class, and the Democrats were the party of the fringes. Both of these were subdivided, each with a Congressional and a National Party wing.

The Republican Congressional Party (representing localism) was much further to the right than the National Republican Party, and as such was closer to the petty-bourgeois than to the upper-middle class outlook. The Democratic Congressional party was much more clearly of the fringes and minorities (and thus often further to the Left) than the Democrat National Party.

The party machinery in each case was in Congressional party control during the intervals between the quadrennial presidential elections, but, in order to win these elections, each had to call into existence, in presidential election years, its shadowy National Party. This meant that the Republicans had to appear to move to the Left, closer to the Center, usually moving to the Right.

As a result, the National parties and their presidential candidates, with the Eastern Establishment assiduously fostering the process being the scenes, moved closer together and nearly met in the center with almost identical candidates and platforms, although the process was concealed, as much as possible, by the revival of obsolescent or meaningless war cries and slogans (often going back to the Civil War).

As soon as the presidential election was over, the two National parties vanished, and party controls fell back into the hands of the two Congressional parties, leaving the President in a precarious position between the two Congressional parties, neither of which was very close to the brief National coalition that had elected him.

The chief problem of American political life for a long time had been to make the two Congressional parties more national and international.

The argument of two parties should represent opposed ideas and policies, one perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinate and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. The policies that are vital and necessary for America are no longer subjects of significant disagreement, but are disputable only in details of procedure, priority, or method.”

Carroll Quigely - “Tragedy and Hope” pp. 1247-1248

Click for full size image

From Wikipedia:

Quigley was born in Boston, and attended Harvard University, where he studied history and earned B.A, M.A., and Ph.D. degrees. He taught at Princeton University, and then at Harvard, and then at the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University from 1941 to 1976.

From 1941 until 1969, he taught a two-semester course at Georgetown on the development of civilizations. According to the obituary in the Washington Star, many alumni of Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service asserted that this was “the most influential course in their undergraduate careers”

In addition to his academic work, Quigley served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Defense, the U.S. Navy, the Smithsonian Institution, and the House Select Committee on Astronautics and Space Exploration in the 1950s.

In his freshman year in the School of Foreign Service at Georgetown, future U.S. President Bill Clinton took Quigley’s course, receiving a ‘B’ as his final grade in both semesters. Clinton named Quigley as an important influence on his aspirations and political philosophy in 1991, when launching his presidential campaign in a speech at Georgetown.

Click here to read “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time”

Times of Israel’s Manny Friedman is Elad Nehorai

 Under The Radar Media

Blogging for the ultra-nationalist Times of Israel, a new online publication based in Jerusalem, Jewish writer Elad Nehorai wrote an opinion piece boldly declaring that Jews DO indeed control the media!

Nehorai, who also writes for the Huffington Post, is a member of the supremacist religious order, the Chabad Lubbavitch which according to Wikipedia is the largest Jewish organization in the world. The Chabad Lubbavitch is notorious for the racist rantings of it’s former leader Menachem Mendel Schneerson.

Nehorai’s bio from the Chabad.org is as follows:

Elad Nehorai is an alumnus of Arizona State University and Mayanot yeshiva. You can find Elad wandering around America, gallivanting around Israel, or getting lost in the clouds. His favorite things to do include reading, writing and conversing with G-d.

Nehorai’s bio from the Huffington Post is as follows:

Elad Nehorai is a writer living in Crown Heights, Brooklyn. Five years ago, he became a religious Jew in the Chabad Hassidic community and has since written about his experience extensively, most recently in his blog Pop Chassid. You can find him on Twitter as @PopChassid and Facebook.

Click here to read how one writer can PROVE that Arabs own Hollywood
Inmage courtesy of Incogman

 Long-Held Beliefs Are Validated Once Again

Nehorai’s braggadocios musings on Jewish media power reference Jewish journalist Joel Stein’s article carried in the December 19, 2008  edition of the LA Times. The article entitled “How Jewish is Hollywood,” carried the tagline: “A poll finds more Americans disagree with the statement that ‘Jews control Hollywood.’ But here’s one Jew who doesn’t.”

Like Stein, it appears that Nehorai wishes to either break the taboo of Jewish influence in the media, or to simply take the opportunity to boast of this remarkable Jewish achievement amongst his fellow Jews. Take your pick. Here are some of Nehorai’s proclamations that validate long-held beliefs held among the silent majority:

[The] funny part is when any anti-Semite or anti-Israel person starts to spout stuff like, “The Jews control the media!” and “The Jews control Washington!”

Suddenly we’re up in arms. We create huge campaigns to take these people down. We do what we can to put them out of work. We publish articles. We’ve created entire organizations that exist just to tell everyone that the Jews don’t control nothin’. No, we don’t control the media, we don’t have any more sway in DC than anyone else. No, no, no, we swear: We’re just like everybody else!

Does anyone else (who’s not a bigot) see the irony of this?

Let’s be honest with ourselves, here, fellow Jews. We do control the media. We’ve got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies it’s almost obscene. Just about every movie or TV show, whether it be “Tropic Thunder” or “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” is rife with actors, directors, and writers who are Jewish. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews?

Imagine if all of these media presenters, journalists, pundits and talking heads were Arab Muslims
Inmage courtesy of Incogman

 Decades of training Americans to deny reality

The suggestion that “Jews control the media,” or rather Jews maintain an over-representation in the media, has long been a taboo in the United States and Western nations. So strong is this taboo that the mere suggestion of Jewish ownership of the media is usually met with strong denouncement from Jews and non-Jews alike. The ideological sledgehammer known as “antisemitism” is often hurled about in a desperate effort to silence the offender and quickly end the discussion.

As Nehorai admits, there are dozens writers, educators, and even entire organizations dedicated to convincing Americans that there is no such thing as Jewish control of the media. Consider the work of Tim Wise and Mark Crispin Miller; two writers who have written essays denying Jewish power in the media. Wise and Miller, along with the Jewish run Anti-Defamation League and their affiliates seemed to have no comments on Nehorai’s article. Upon inspection ofWise and Miller’s work, their denials seem almost comical when compared to Elad Nehorai’s bold declaration of Jewish media control.

Nehorai is right to question is why Jews and their defenders feign outrage and continue to deny their stunning acheivements in the media. The rest of us can only question silently amonst ourselves “why are we forced to accept the false reality that Jews don’t dominate American media?”

Names have been changed to protect the arrogant

 Loose lips sink ships

Although Nehorai’s article was circulated fairly widely on the usual alternative and anti-Zionist news sites such as What Really Happened, it was pretty much ignored by the larger mainstream online news outlets such as the Drudge Report and the aforementioned Huffington Post. And of course it was ignored by all of the alphabet soup media outlets. There were, however some interesting discussions that arose in light of this recent revelation.

One such discussion would be from the comment section of the Times of Israel article itself, and another discussion is from the Something Awful forum. While the the comment section of the article offers some serious and insightful debate, the Something Awful discussion is full of philo-semitic denial and sarcastic downplaying of the idea that Jews are over-represented in American media.

Strangely, about a week after Nehorai’s boastful article was posted on The Times of Israel, the page was updated, Elad’s profile photo was removed and the the article was no longer attributed to “Elad Nehorai,” but rather to a “Manny Friedman.” At the end of the article, the following Orwellian disclaimer now reads: “This article was written under an assumed name.”

Could be that some of Nehorai’s more level-headed contemporaries and media associates may have thought that he was letting the cat out of the bag and wished to distance themselves from the issue of Jewish control of the media? One can only speculate, although it would make sense that at a time of financial uncertainty,  some Jews in prominent positions of power would be concerned about drawing too much attention to themselves from those who would otherwise remain ignorant.

Click here for a truly stomach-turning critique of modern media

How the media is used is the issue

The whole idea of Jewish control, over-representation or whatever you want to call it is only part of the issue.  Aside from who controls the media, the real issue is what is being done with the media and why. The day to day blatant degeneracy, subversion and perception management of the media are far more explosive issues than who controls it.

Nehorai himself seems to gingerly address the issue of this degeneracy and subversion. When he writes about “dirty TV shows that sully the spiritual atmosphere of the world,”  was Nehorai referring to the Curb Your Enthusiasm  episode where producer, writer and actor Larry David instructs a Girl Scout on tampon insertion? Or perhaps was he referring to David’s episode where the running gag involved an eight year-old girl and her vagina?

Are we to assume that Nahorai is unaware of this degeneracy and blatant subversion of the media, or are we to assume that despite his religious beliefs, that he simply approves of it?

This article may warrant a follow up, in either written or video form (or both), particularly on the issue media subversion and how this subversion affects us all. In the meantime, if you’ve found this article useful and agree with the sentiments here, don’t be afraid to speak out! Forward this article on to friends and family, share it on Facebook and other social networks.

Further Research:

Who Controls Television?

Who Controls Hollywood?

Who Controls the News? (Part 1)

Who Controls the News? (Part 2)

Who Controls Big Media?