<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301</id><updated>2012-02-16T03:31:33.172-08:00</updated><title type="text">Issues</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/" /><author><name>Alexander</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16703036372918652811</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>6</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/wrba-issues" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="wrba-issues" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301.post-6930304034323382000</id><published>2012-02-07T21:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-02-07T21:27:59.075-08:00</updated><title type="text">Redistricting</title><content type="html">The Woodhaven Residents' Block Association firmly believes that whenever possible, the entirety of the neighborhood should be represented by a single representative at each level of government. &amp;nbsp;Woodhaven is a cohesive community, which means that common issues affect the whole neighborhood, not just a fraction of it. &amp;nbsp;Having a single representative at each level of government would help ensure that our collective voice is heard, not diluted. &amp;nbsp;Multiple representatives make it difficult for residents to know who's representing them and whom to ask for help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In January 2012, a legislative task force proposed new lines for New York's Assembly and Senate districts. &amp;nbsp;The proposal placed all of Woodhaven within a single Assembly district, but split the neighborhood among three separate Senate districts. &amp;nbsp;The WRBA supported the Assembly proposal and strongly objected to the Senate proposal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;See the WRBA's &lt;a href="http://news.woodhaven-nyc.org/2012/01/wrba-opposes-gerrymander-that-would_30.html"&gt;press release on the proposed district lines&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The WRBA also submitted written testimony to the task force, making its case for unified Senate representation. &amp;nbsp;View the testimony &lt;a href="http://content.woodhaven-nyc.org/LATFORTestimony.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our views on the redistricting proposal have received some attention:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/queens-lawmakers-civic-leaders-rail-proposed-legislative-districts-article-1.1018730"&gt;New York Daily News&lt;/a&gt;, "Queens lawmakers and civic leaders rail against proposed legislative districts," by Joseph Parziale and Lisa L. Colangelo, 2/7/2012&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://queens-politics.com/2012/01/block-association-says-no-to-new-gerrymandered-lines/"&gt;Queens Politics&lt;/a&gt;, "Block Association Says NO to New Lines," 1/31/2012&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.qchron.com/news/queenswide/proposed-district-lines-enrage-queens-leaders/article_c8837436-95cd-51a0-b8dc-d8c7b73b93fc.html"&gt;Queens Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;, "Proposed district lines enrage Queens leaders," by Anna Gustafson, 2/2/2012&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.timesledger.com/stories/2012/5/wrapuponredistricting_all_2012_02_02_q.html"&gt;Times Ledger&lt;/a&gt;, "Qns. residents slam Albany's plan," by Howard Koplowitz, 2/2/2012&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.queenstribune.com/feature/Feature_020212_NewDistrictMaps.html"&gt;Queens Tribune&lt;/a&gt;, "New District Maps Raise Concerns On All Sides," by Domenick Rafter, 2/2/2012&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://queenscourier.com/2012/senate-redistricting-plan-is-divisive/"&gt;Queens Courier&lt;/a&gt;, "Senate Redistricting plan is divisive," by&amp;nbsp;Michael Pantelidis, 1/31/2012&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6156959536854310301-6930304034323382000?l=issues.woodhaven-nyc.org' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/6930304034323382000" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/6930304034323382000" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/2012/02/redistricting.html" title="Redistricting" /><author><name>Woodhaven Residents Block Association</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09085838521856589485</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="27" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S4dFcw8xNJI/AAAAAAAAAQg/zoiwlli7h5M/S220/house.gif" /></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301.post-5073063953937201511</id><published>2011-11-28T12:03:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2011-11-28T12:43:29.465-08:00</updated><title type="text">Illegally Posted Signs</title><content type="html">The Woodhaven Residents' Block Association has worked hard to rid our neighborhood of signs and advertisements illegally posted on telephone poles, lampposts, and other public property. &amp;nbsp;These signs are eyesores and break the law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our efforts to combat illegal signs have received some attention:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.projectwoodhaven.com/2010/June/sign-warriors.html"&gt;Project Woodhaven&lt;/a&gt;, "Sign Warriors," by Ed Wendell, June 2010&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.timesnewsweekly.com/news/2010-06-24/Local_News/WRBA_GOES_ON__A_HUGE_TEAR.html"&gt;Times Newsweekly&lt;/a&gt;, "WRBA Goes on a Huge 'Tear,'" by Ralph Mancini, 6/24/2010&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.queenstribune.com/news/News_060310_Signs.html"&gt;Queens Tribune&lt;/a&gt;, "There Is Relief For Annoying Signs," by Domenick Rafter, 6/3/2010&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;Our message to elected officials about illegally posted signs&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our latest effort has been a message we sent to our Assemblyman Mike Miller and Council Member Eric Ulrich, urging changes to the law. &amp;nbsp;Our entire message is below.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;b&gt;From:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Woodhaven Residents' Block Association &lt;info@woodhaven-nyc.org&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt; Date:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:18 AM&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt; Subject:&lt;/b&gt;&amp;nbsp; A longer-term solution to the problem of illegal signs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt; To:&lt;/b&gt; &amp;nbsp;Miller, Mike; Ulrich, Eric&lt;/info@woodhaven-nyc.org&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;info@woodhaven-nyc.org&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cc:&lt;/b&gt; &amp;nbsp;[...]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dear Assemblyman Miller and Councilman Ulrich,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Woodhaven Residents' Block Association (WRBA) appreciates the event you held yesterday to call attention to the issue of illegally posted signs, especially in Woodhaven.  As you know, this is a real problem on which the WRBA has focused for over a year (see coverage &lt;a href="http://www.queenstribune.com/news/News_060310_Signs.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.timesnewsweekly.com/news/2010-06-24/Local_News/WRBA_GOES_ON__A_HUGE_TEAR.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tearing down illegally posted signs is only a short-term solution, however, because new ones soon go up in their place.  We would like to use this opportunity to encourage you to explore longer-term solutions to the problem.  In particular, we believe it is a shortcoming that Department of Sanitation personnel -- rather than private citizens -- must observe the illegally posted signs in order for the offense to be prosecuted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every hour that an illegal sign remains posted provides an incentive for businesses to flout the law with their eyesore advertisements.  The best way to combat the problem is to remove the signs as quickly as possible and to prosecute those responsible for them.  Unfortunately, we have been informed by Mr. Iggy Terranova, community affairs officer at the Department of Sanitation, that if a private citizen removes an illegal sign (and private citizens, such as the WRBA, are often the best-situated to remove signs swiftly), the Department of Sanitation is unable to prosecute those responsible for the signs.  According to Mr. Terranova, only a sworn statement by a trained officer of the law, such as a Department of Sanitation officer, would serve as adequate evidence in the proceedings against someone accused of illegally posting signs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the relevant laws for illegal signs (NYC Administrative Code §10-119 and §10-121) are silent on the evidentiary adequacy of affidavits or testimony by private citizens, it is worth noting that another section of the New York City Administrative Code specifically states that sworn statements or testimony by private citizens might be useful in prosecuting illegal dumping (see NYC Administrative Code §16-119(f)).  The WRBA believes that the Environmental Control Board and the Department of Sanitation should make any changes that would permit private citizens' sworn statements, testimony, and photographs to serve as useful evidence in prosecuting illegal posting, too.  In addition, the WRBA welcomes any changes to New York State law (and in particular, New York Penal Law §145.30) that would facilitate such changes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please join the WRBA in pursuing these modifications.  It is a win-win policy to allow citizens to remove illegal signs without invalidating any potential prosecution of the lawbreaking companies.  It empowers citizens, relieves the Department of Sanitation of some of the burden of enforcement, diminishes the incentives companies have to break the law, and leaves intact the chance to pursue legal recourse against law-breakers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Alexander J. Blenkinsopp&lt;br /&gt;Second Vice President&lt;br /&gt;On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Woodhaven Residents' Block Association&lt;/info@woodhaven-nyc.org&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6156959536854310301-5073063953937201511?l=issues.woodhaven-nyc.org' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/5073063953937201511" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/5073063953937201511" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/2011/11/illegally-posted-signs.html" title="Illegally Posted Signs" /><author><name>Woodhaven Residents Block Association</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09085838521856589485</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="27" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S4dFcw8xNJI/AAAAAAAAAQg/zoiwlli7h5M/S220/house.gif" /></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301.post-2732191615461326858</id><published>2010-03-24T14:04:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-03-25T22:45:11.307-07:00</updated><title type="text">Illegal Conversions</title><content type="html">&lt;strong&gt;What is an illegal conversion?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An illegal conversion is an alteration or modification of an existing building to create an additional housing unit without first obtaining the approval of the NYC Department of Buildings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Examples of illegal conversions include:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Using for residential occupancy&amp;nbsp;a property zoned for manufacturing or industrial use.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Creating a housing unit in a building designated for manufacturing or industrial use.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Adding an apartment in the basement, attic, or garage without obtaining the approval or permits from the Department of Buildings.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Creating a rooming house (single-room occupancy) or dividing an apartment into single-room occupancies.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Why are illegal conversions harmful?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Illegal conversions reduce the quality of life by bringing more people to live in a neighborhood than it can support.&amp;nbsp; This unplanned growth can strain the capacity of the buses and subways, as well as&amp;nbsp;the sanitation and sewer systems.&amp;nbsp; It can cause overcrowding in schools and create parking shortages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most important, if the construction does not meet the Building Code standards, the building may not be safe to occupy.&amp;nbsp; The lives of the occupants, as well as those of the City's emergency responders, could be at risk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Building owners who receive violations for illegal conversions face court hearings, fines, and daily penalties for the use of each illegal unit.&amp;nbsp; These penalties can amount to thousands of dollars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What to do if you suspect an illegal conversion?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you suspect an illegal conversion, &lt;a href="http://contact.woodhaven-nyc.org/"&gt;contact&lt;/a&gt; the Woodhaven Residents' Block Association.&amp;nbsp; We will anonymously log the complaint with the Buildings Department and request that a Buildings Inspector be routed to the site to inspect the property.&amp;nbsp; We will also check the legal use of a building.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition, we will monitor the Buildings Department website to see what actions have been taken and contact you to confirm these actions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S6p-zj-PA9I/AAAAAAAAAfA/rhlmYjYppJQ/s1600/Penalties.bmp" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="285" nt="true" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S6p-zj-PA9I/AAAAAAAAAfA/rhlmYjYppJQ/s400/Penalties.bmp" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: x-small;"&gt;Source: New York City Department of Buildings.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To view&amp;nbsp;a PDF of our&amp;nbsp;original leaflet containing all the&amp;nbsp;information above, click &lt;a href="http://content.woodhaven-nyc.org/Illegal%20Conversions%2012-18-09.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6156959536854310301-2732191615461326858?l=issues.woodhaven-nyc.org' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/2732191615461326858" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/2732191615461326858" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/2010/03/illegal-conversions.html" title="Illegal Conversions" /><author><name>Woodhaven Residents Block Association</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09085838521856589485</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="27" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S4dFcw8xNJI/AAAAAAAAAQg/zoiwlli7h5M/S220/house.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S6p-zj-PA9I/AAAAAAAAAfA/rhlmYjYppJQ/s72-c/Penalties.bmp" height="72" width="72" /></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301.post-2495950058613540872</id><published>2010-03-20T09:24:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-06-26T21:41:03.739-07:00</updated><title type="text">Noise</title><content type="html">As sometimes happens in any urban environment where people live in proximity to each other, noisy neighbors&amp;nbsp;can be a problem.&amp;nbsp; We hope that all residents of Woodhaven would be considerate of their neighbors, but since reality sometimes falls short of our hopes, the WRBA has&amp;nbsp;published a leaflet to help residents&amp;nbsp;deal with noise problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Click &lt;a href="http://www.projectwoodhaven.com/2009/August/WRBA%20Noise%20Brochure%2007-31-09.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; to view a PDF of the leaflet. &amp;nbsp;A&amp;nbsp;plain-text version of the leaflet is available at the bottom of this webpage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In June 2011, the WRBA submitted written testimony to a New York City Council committee, supporting proposed legislation that would increase fines for residential noise while also urging the City Council to consider other options for tackling this problem. &amp;nbsp;A PDF of the full testimony is available&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://content.woodhaven-nyc.org/WoodhavenNoiseTestimony.pdf"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, and the press release about the testimony can be seen&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://news.woodhaven-nyc.org/2011/06/woodhaven-sounds-off-about-noise-in.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is the plain-text version of the leaflet mentioned above:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Noise&amp;nbsp;is a problem that typically gets worse during the Summer months, but it could be an issue at any time of the year.&amp;nbsp; Here are a few things you need to know about noise – what your rights are, and how you should go about resolving a noise complaint.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First of all, there is &lt;b&gt;no curfew or time limit&lt;/b&gt; on noise.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In other words, if there is a noise disturbance, don’t feel that it won’t be taken seriously just because it’s 4 in the afternoon, not 4 in the morning!&amp;nbsp; Noise is noise, and you have a right not to be disturbed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here’s the best way for you to handle a noise issue:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Step 1.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Call 311. While 311 may not always resolve your issue, it’s important to get your issue logged and into the system. Make sure you ask for, and receive, a Service Request Number.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This number will have the format:&amp;nbsp; C1-1-XXXXXXXXX &lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Step 2.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Give 311 a chance to work.&amp;nbsp; Hopefully, this will take care of the issue. However, after an hour, if they have not responded to your complaint – and the noise issue persists – then you should call the 102nd Precinct directly at: 718-805-3200&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Step 3.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take down as much information as you can when calling the precinct.&amp;nbsp; Write down what time you called and the name of the Police Officer that you spoke to. Hopefully, the 102nd Precinct will dispatch a unit and your problem will taken care of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Step 4.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If your problem does not get resolved, then you need to report this issue to the Block Association. You can call us directly at our 24-hour phone line (718-296-3735) , or via email.&amp;nbsp; We will need all of the information you collected above – the 311 Service Request Number, details of your call to the 102nd Precinct, the location and exact address of the offender, etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Other Things You Should Know&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Car Radio Noise&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It’s easy enough to file a noise complaint when it’s at a static location. But if you are complaining about noise from passing cars, it’s a lot harder for the police to stop.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or if you have a specific consistent offender, it would help if you could pinpoint a location (e.g. intersection and a time where the noise is common.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Barking Dogs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Police Department and the 102nd Precinct are not responsible for handling barking dogs. While you can try reporting barking dogs to 311, these types of complaints should be directed to Animal Control: 1-800-714-8727.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6156959536854310301-2495950058613540872?l=issues.woodhaven-nyc.org' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/2495950058613540872" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/2495950058613540872" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/2010/03/noise.html" title="Noise" /><author><name>Woodhaven Residents Block Association</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09085838521856589485</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="27" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S4dFcw8xNJI/AAAAAAAAAQg/zoiwlli7h5M/S220/house.gif" /></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301.post-2807518071552662524</id><published>2010-03-19T13:41:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-08-05T22:41:47.163-07:00</updated><title type="text">Out-of-State Vehicles</title><content type="html">The Woodhaven Residents' Block Association has a program to report out-of-state vehicles that have remained parked on a Woodhaven street for extended periods of time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Woodhaven residents should &lt;a href="http://contact.woodhaven-nyc.org/"&gt;contact&lt;/a&gt; the WRBA if an automobile with license plates from outside New York has been parked on their street for more than a month. After gathering information from the caller, the WRBA will contact the appropriate agency from the vehicle's state to inform them of the vehicle's whereabouts and to ask them to investigate whether the vehicle is appropriately registered.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“Parking has historically been hard to find in Woodhaven," said WRBA Director Vance Barbour. "If these vehicles' owners are dodging local state regulations, and skipping out on paying fees to New York State like the rest of the community pays, we owe it to our residents to call it to the attention of the proper authorities.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The program is a response to many Woodhaven residents' complaints about out-of-state vehicles taking up parking spaces and potentially evading the law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Many residents have already contacted the WRBA to make use of this program, which has received significant media attention:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/queens/2010/01/14/2010-01-14_fighting_parking_spot_pigs.html"&gt;New York Daily News&lt;/a&gt;, "Woodhaven residents track cars with non-New York license plates parked for extended periods," by Lisa L. Colangelo, 1/15/2010&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wpix.com/news/local/wpix-woodhaven-parking-spaces,0,3690014.story"&gt;WPIX&lt;/a&gt;, "Woodhaven Residents Battle Over Parking Spaces," by Jackie Hyland, 1/14/2010&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.queenscourier.com/articles/2010/01/19/news/regional/courier_sun/south/doc4b56354cbb915456617234.txt"&gt;Queens Courier&lt;/a&gt;, "WRBA tackles out-of-state parkers," by Michael Fiacco, 1/19/2010&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.findlaw.com/legally_weird/2010/01/new-yorkers-start-tracking-license-plate-numbers.html"&gt;FindLaw&lt;/a&gt;, "New Yorkers Start Tracking License Plate Numbers," by &lt;span class="vcard author"&gt;Minara El-Rahman, 1/22/2010&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6156959536854310301-2807518071552662524?l=issues.woodhaven-nyc.org' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/2807518071552662524" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/2807518071552662524" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/2010/03/out-of-state-vehicles.html" title="Out-of-State Vehicles" /><author><name>Woodhaven Residents Block Association</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09085838521856589485</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="27" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_5bojnaJWK8E/S4dFcw8xNJI/AAAAAAAAAQg/zoiwlli7h5M/S220/house.gif" /></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6156959536854310301.post-8971205603869509888</id><published>2010-03-18T22:29:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-08-05T23:44:17.092-07:00</updated><title type="text">Real Estate Solicitations, and Cease-and-Desist</title><content type="html">After prolonged efforts by the Woodhaven Residents' Block Association and the  Greater Woodhaven Development Corporation, Woodhaven has been named one of only  seven Queens neighborhoods in which homeowners can choose to prevent  solicitations from real estate agents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New York's Secretary of State  renewed Woodhaven's status as a "cease-and-desist zone," meaning that Woodhaven  homeowners can be placed on a list to ensure that they receive no real estate  solicitations -- including phone calls, mailings, and door-to-door visits -- to  sell their properties. To be placed on the list, the required form can be  submitted electronically at &lt;a href="http://www.dos.state.ny.us/lcns/cdform.asp" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.dos.state.ny.us/&lt;wbr&gt;lcns/cdform.asp&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The WRBA urges all homeowners to fill out the  very simple form, so that they can enjoy the benefits of Woodhaven's  cease-and-desist coverage. Woodhaven residents who would like a paper copy of  the form mailed to them should call the WRBA office at (718) 296-3735.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Woodhaven's cease-and-desist coverage has received substantial news coverage:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="http://queens.ny1.com/content/top_stories/123314/homeowners-laud-cease-and-desist-renewal-in-woodhaven"&gt;NY1 News&lt;/a&gt;, "&lt;span id="ctl00_contPlace1_ShowArticleControl_lblArHeadline"&gt;Homeowners Laud Cease  And Desist Renewal In Woodhaven," by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_contPlace1_ShowArticleControl_lblArByLine"&gt;Tammy Mutasa, 8/5/2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_contPlace1_ShowArticleControl_lblArByLine"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20442772&amp;amp;BRD=2731&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=574908&amp;amp;rfi=8"&gt;Queens Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;, "Woodhaven is C&amp;amp;D Zone," 7/29/2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span id="ctl00_contPlace1_ShowArticleControl_lblArByLine"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.queenscourier.com/articles/2010/07/26/news/regional/courier_sun/south/doc4c4dd3a860626517735001.txt"&gt;Queens Courier&lt;/a&gt;, "&lt;/span&gt;Cease and desist renewed for Woodhaven," 7/26/2010&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/6156959536854310301-8971205603869509888?l=issues.woodhaven-nyc.org' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/8971205603869509888" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/6156959536854310301/posts/default/8971205603869509888" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://issues.woodhaven-nyc.org/2010/08/real-estate-solicitations.html" title="Real Estate Solicitations, and Cease-and-Desist" /><author><name>Alexander</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16703036372918652811</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author></entry></feed>

