<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>WWR Subrogation</title>
	
	<link>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com</link>
	<description>Your Subrogation News &amp; Information Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/wwrsubrogation" /><feedburner:info uri="wwrsubrogation" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Subrogation Claim Under Ohio’s Worker’s Compensation Act Has Six Year Statute of Limitations</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/1D5tlaam1KE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/11/29/subrogation-claim-under-ohio%e2%80%99s-worker%e2%80%99s-compensation-act-has-six-year-statute-of-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Worker's Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statute of Limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worker's Comp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Ohio Supreme Court has recently ruled that a statutory subrogee’s claim under the Ohio’s Worker’s Compensation Act was not derivative of the claimant’s tort claim and therefore, not barred by the two year statute of limitations.  See Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation v. McKinley, et al. (2011) 130 Ohio St. 3d 156.  In this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/11/29/subrogation-claim-under-ohio%e2%80%99s-worker%e2%80%99s-compensation-act-has-six-year-statute-of-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/11/29/subrogation-claim-under-ohio%e2%80%99s-worker%e2%80%99s-compensation-act-has-six-year-statute-of-limitations/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Louisiana Senate Bill 169, Section 1881</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/iCpB0asUh-s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/07/12/louisiana-senate-bill-169-section-1881/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lousiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUBRO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Louisiana Bill was recently signed by Governor Bobby Jindal and enacted into law. The original bill has been modified, but still lacks clarity. The law states that no health insurer shall seek reimbursement from an automobile medical payment coverage without first obtaining the written consent of the insured or his/her legal representative. Once nine [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/07/12/louisiana-senate-bill-169-section-1881/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/07/12/louisiana-senate-bill-169-section-1881/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATE – Recent Bills Affecting Subrogation!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/jX29Amk31K8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/07/06/update-recent-bills-affecting-subrogation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIP/MedPay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UM/UIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subro Bills Proposed Enacted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[H.R  2205 The United States House of Representatives introduced a bill on June 16, 2011 aimed at tort reform.  The stated intent of the bill is to improve the medical justice system and the short title is “Ending Defensive Medicine and Encouraging Innovative Reforms Act of 2011.”  This bill has the potential to bar subrogation [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/07/06/update-recent-bills-affecting-subrogation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/07/06/update-recent-bills-affecting-subrogation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>NASP – Litigation Skills Conference</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/_UZTwGN5xwg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/03/24/nasp-litigation-skills-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIP/MedPay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UM/UIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEGLIGENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUBRO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Dougherty and A.J. Ober are in San Diego, CA this week attending the National Association of Subrogation Professionals - Litigation Skills Conference.  We have met many great attorneys and insurance professionals, while attending courses to improve our litigaton techniques and better represent our clients.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/03/24/nasp-litigation-skills-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/03/24/nasp-litigation-skills-conference/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Excess Insurance Clauses – OHIO</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/Q35cb_bxQFI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/03/11/excess-insurance-clauses-ohio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 22:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liability Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUBRO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  WHEN CLAUSES CONFLICT By: Jason A. Mosbaugh, Esq. - Cincinnati Office             Often, one of the largest obstacles to the recovery of a client’s subrogation claim is a lack of liability insurance by the tortfeasors.  On the opposite side of the spectrum however if the tortfeasor is covered by multiple policies of insurance other issues [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/03/11/excess-insurance-clauses-ohio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/03/11/excess-insurance-clauses-ohio/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Amicus Briefs filed in PA Subro cases</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/hXD5uW0D04s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/07/amicus-briefs-filed-in-pa-subro-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIP/MedPay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deductible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Association of  Subrogation Professionals (NASP) has filed Amicus Briefs on the issues of Pro-Rata Reimbursement of Insured&#8217;s Deductibles and PIP Subrogation.  WWR has long been a member of NASP.  The following information has been provided by NASP. The NASP Amicus Committee has been extremely busy and filed two briefs in January 2011.  Both [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/07/amicus-briefs-filed-in-pa-subro-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/07/amicus-briefs-filed-in-pa-subro-cases/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Senate Bill 191/Assembly Bill 793</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/eA7VqTAsjnE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/07/new-jersey-senate-bill-191assembly-bill-793/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Made Whole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Association of Subrogation Professionals (NASP) reported the following information below.  WWR has long been a member of NASP. NASP Opposes New Jersey Senate Bill 191/Assembly Bill 793 An anti-subrogation bill recently swept through New Jersey’s Assembly and Senate, receiving the requisite number of votes.  The bill was presented to the Governor for his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/07/new-jersey-senate-bill-191assembly-bill-793/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/07/new-jersey-senate-bill-191assembly-bill-793/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Change to PA Comparative Negligence Law</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/h7t4U34RcFs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/02/proposed-change-in-pa-comparative-negligence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UM/UIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPARATIVE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEGLIGENCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUBRO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TORT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 27, 2011, changes to the PA Comparative Negligence law (42 Pa.C.S. § 7102) were proposed to the PA General Assembly under House Bill No. 1. As the law currently stands, when liability is apportioned among multiple Defendants, all Defendants are deemed jointly and severally liable, regardless of their percentage of apportioned fault.  This has long been [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/02/proposed-change-in-pa-comparative-negligence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2011/02/02/proposed-change-in-pa-comparative-negligence/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Supreme Court Limits the Application of the Doctrine of Equitable Subrogation</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/0UBqRL-Wpf8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2010/08/24/ohio-supreme-court-limits-the-application-of-the-doctrine-of-equitable-subrogation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subro Mortgage Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  In Ohio, mortgages are generally entitled to priority based on the dates they are filed for record. In other words, a properly recorded mortgage is entitled to priority over a subsequently recorded mortgage.  However, there are exceptions to this rule.  The common law doctrine of equitable subrogation is one such exception.  It has often [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2010/08/24/ohio-supreme-court-limits-the-application-of-the-doctrine-of-equitable-subrogation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2010/08/24/ohio-supreme-court-limits-the-application-of-the-doctrine-of-equitable-subrogation/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>CLASS ACTION FOR DEDUCTIBLE, Brenda Jones v. Nationwide, 2010 PA Super 90</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wwrsubrogation/~3/aacmY3NXWY8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2010/08/23/class-action-for-deductible-brenda-jones-v-nationwide-2010-pa-super-90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>August Ober</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bad Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deductible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This matter was a Class Action filed in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County by Insured Brenda Jones (and those similarly situated) against her Insurer, Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company.   The basis of the claim was the Insurer did not reimburse the full $500.00 deductible, and instead reimbursed the Insured a pro-rata amount [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2010/08/23/class-action-for-deductible-brenda-jones-v-nationwide-2010-pa-super-90/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.wwrsubrogation.com/2010/08/23/class-action-for-deductible-brenda-jones-v-nationwide-2010-pa-super-90/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
