The lawsuits involve allegations that Olympus designed and sold unreasonably dangerous scopes, which contain design defects that make them nearly impossible to properly clean, disinfect or sterilize between procedures.

While many individuals contacting our law firm are just now learning about the Olympus scope infection problems, in this post we will outline the long history of FDA warnings, recalls and hospital infection outbreak reports that have been reported, highlighting the serious risks associated with these devices.

Request a Free Claim Review by a SCOPE INFECTION LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

0%

Comments

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Did you or a loved one develop an infection resulting in hospitalization after a scope procedure?*

---YesNoUnsure

2. Which type of scope procedure did you have*

---Colonoscopy (colon exam)Upper Endoscopy (stomach scope through the mouth)ERCP (bile duct or pancreas procedure)Cystoscopy (bladder or prostate scope)Ureteroscopy (kidney stone scope)Bronchoscopy (lung scope)Sinus Endoscopy (sinus scope)Hysteroscopy (uterine scope)Laparoscopic surgeryNot sure / Other scope procedureNo scope procedure

3. How long after the procedure did the infection start?*

---Within 1 week1 to 4 weeks1 to 6 months6 to 12 monthsMore than 12 monthsNot sureNo infection, but I have questions

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

⚖️ Olympus Scope Infection Lawsuits

Despite these repeated warnings and safety issues, Olympus has failed to fix the known design and manufacturing problems that allowed bacteria, tissue or biological material to survive the recommended cleaning and reprocessing steps outlined when these devices were distributed to hospitals and medical clinics.

As a result, our scope infection lawyers are pursuing financial compensation for individuals who have been left with devastating infections and complications, such as:

• Sepsis
• Bloodstream infections
• Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
• E. coli infections
• Exposure to blood-borne infections, including HIV or tuberculosis
• Wrongful death

If you or a loved one experienced problems, find out if you qualify for a colonoscopy infection lawsuit, endoscopy infection lawsuit or ERCP infection lawsuits by calling our law firm toll free at 1-800-522-0102, or completing the form on this page.

All cases are reviewed by our scope infection lawyers on a contingency fee basis, which means that there are no fees or expenses charged unless a settlement or recovery is obtained.

While it is easy for outsiders to look at these sports gambling losses and chalk it up to a lack of self-discipline, in this post we will take a closer look at how the platforms were intentionally developed and designed with sports gambling “features”, which played a critical role in causing these DraftKings and FanDuel addiction problems.

For many users, the harm developed gradually after mobile sportsbook apps made betting feel like a normal part of watching sports. What may have started as a small wager during a game often grew into repeated deposits, live bets, parlays and attempts to win back losses, while app notifications and bonus offers kept pulling users back.

Request a Free Claim Review by an SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

Facebook

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Estimated losses from sports betting / gambling apps:*

---Under $10,000$10,000 to $25,000$25,000 to $50,000$50,000 to $100,000Over $100,000No Gambling Losses, but have other questions

2. Age when first started using sports betting / gambling apps:*

---Under 1818 to 21 years old22 to 25 years old26 to 30 years oldOver 30 years old

3. Has there been any medical treatment or counseling related to gambling addiction?:*

---Yes, diagnosed gambling disorderYes, treatment/counseling related to gambling lossesNo, but I intend to get counselingNo, but I have other questions

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

DraftKings, FanDuel and other sportsbook platforms have placed online betting in the middle of sports fandom, social media, college life and everyday phone use, creating a gambling environment that can be constant, personalized and difficult to escape.

While these companies all claim they promote “responsible gaming,” lawsuits point out how the apps were actually designed to encourage repeat betting, collect user data and push vulnerable users toward more deposits, more wagers and deeper financial harm.

Saiontz & Kirk is investigating both DraftKings lawsuits and FanDuel lawsuits involving allegations that sportsbook operators used addictive app features, targeted promotions and data driven marketing practices that allowed gambling addiction to overcome restraint among young users.

As a result of these reckless actions, financial compensation may be available for individuals or families dealing with:

• Sports betting losses or gambling app debt totaling $10,000 or more
• Credit damage caused by compulsive betting
• Repeated deposits, bonus offers or VIP incentives
• Academic problems, job loss or missed financial obligations
• Anxiety, depression, emotional distress or suicidal thoughts
• Counseling, therapy or gambling addiction treatment

To see if you qualify for a settlement, request a free case evaluation with a sports gambling addiction lawyer today or call us toll-free at 1-800-522-0102.

The complaints describe dangerous defects associated with the surgical mesh products, which may result in the need for additional procedures to drain fluid or blood, repair damaged tissue or attempt to revise the breast implant due to complications from GalaFLEX, Phasix or other similar products. In many cases, women have required breast mesh explant surgery, leaving them with permanent and disfiguring injuries.

Request a Free Claim Review by a BREAST MESH LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

0%

Instagram

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Did you or a loved one undergo breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra?*

---Yes, breast reconstructionYes, cosmetic breast surgeryUnsureNo, but i have questions

2. How long after the breast surgery did complications first develop?*

---Within first yearMore than 1 yearNo complications, but I have questions

3. Did you require additional surgery to remove the breast mesh or internal bra?*

---Yes, Breast Mesh was surgically removedNo, Breast mesh is too dangerous to removeNo, but I am continuing to treat for problemsNo, removal is not neededUnsure

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

The breast mesh lawyers at Saiontz & Kirk are actively reviewing claims for women who received a GalaFLEX or Phasix breast mesh, and experienced a number of different problems, including:

• Nerve damage
• Infection or abscess
• Seroma
• Hematomas
• Implant rupture
• Skin necrosis
• Mesh migration or displacement
• Reconstructive failure
• Explant or revision surgery

In this post, we explain why explant surgery is involved in so many cases being investigated by our law firm, the symptoms that may indicate breast mesh removal is needed and the impact failed breast mesh may have on a woman’s overall quality of life.

If you or a loved one have experienced problems from GalaFLEX or another internal bra system, do not hesitate to contact our office today for a free consulation and claim evaluation. Find out whether financial compensation may be available through a breast mesh settlement by calling 1-800-522-0102 or complete the form on this page.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

Request a Free Claim Review by a SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

0%

Instagram

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. How long ago was the Spinal Cord Stimulator implanted?*

---0-5 years ago6-10 years agoOver 10 years agoUnsure when implantedDid not have spinal cord stimulator, but have questions

2. Which best describes the complications experienced after the Spinal Cord Stimulator?*

---Burns or shocksDevice migrationLead wires problemsOther malfunction or injuryNo complications, but I have questions

3. Did the complications require medical treatment or surgery (including removal of the device)?*

---Yes, Medical Evaluation or TreatmentYes, Removal SurgeryNo, but I plan to seek treatmentNo treatment or surgery

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Although spinal cord stimulation systems are marketed to manage chronic back and nerve pain, serious risks can arise when lead wires inside the body fracture or malfunction. These thin insulated wires deliver the electrical impulses that interrupt pain signals, and when they break or shift out of position, patients may experience sudden loss of relief, painful shocks, or worsening neurological symptoms.

Despite reports of lead instability, therapy interruption, and device malfunction involving certain systems manufactured by companies such as Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Nevro and others, these devices have remained widely used in chronic pain treatment.

As a result, our spinal cord stimulator lawyers are now pursuing claims for individuals who suffered serious injuries such as:

• Lead wire fracture or migration
• Electrical shocks or overstimulation
• Sudden loss of pain relief
• Worsening chronic back or nerve pain
• Revision surgery or device removal
• Permanent nerve damage
• Long-term spinal cord complications

If you or a loved one experienced complications after one of these pain management devices was implanted, financial compensation may be available through a spinal cord stimulator injury lawsuit. Request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today to speak with a spinal cord stimulator lawyer.

Request a Free Claim Review by a HEATED INSOLE LAWYER

Δ

• Email
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
• FIRST NAME:*
• LAST NAME:*
• PRIMARY PHONE:
• ALT. PHONE:
• EMAIL:
• DETAILS ABOUT CASE:

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Although heated insoles, electric foot warmers, and heated socks are often marketed as safe and convenient solutions for cold weather, circulation issues, or medical comfort, they can pose serious risks when they malfunction or lack proper safety features. Many of these products rely on lithium-ion batteries and internal heating elements that sit directly against the foot inside enclosed footwear, creating conditions where dangerous heat buildup can occur.

When overheating occurs, users may not feel warning signs in time to prevent serious injury, resulting in severe burns that can worsen before the product is removed.

Despite a growing number of injury reports and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) warnings involving heated insoles sold through Amazon, these products were widely sold for years without adequate safety warnings or design safeguards.

As a result, our burn injury lawyers are now pursuing compensation for individuals who suffered serious injuries such as:

• Second- and third-degree burns to the feet or toes
• Permanent scarring or disfigurement
• Nerve damage or loss of sensation
• Reduced mobility or difficulty walking

To find out if you qualify for a heated insole or foot warmer lawsuit, request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today.

Women across the U.S. are now coming forward after suffering devastating injuries from these widely used mesh devices, which have been sold to plastic surgeons for use as “internal bra” supports, despite never being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use during breast surgery.

Request a Free Claim Review by a BREAST MESH LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

0%

URL

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Did you or a loved one undergo breast surgery involving mesh or an internal bra?*

---Yes, breast reconstructionYes, cosmetic breast surgeryUnsureNo, but i have questions

2. How long after the breast surgery did complications first develop?*

---Within first yearMore than 1 yearNo complications, but I have questions

3. Did you require additional surgery to remove the breast mesh or internal bra?*

---Yes, Breast Mesh was surgically removedNo, Breast mesh is too dangerous to removeNo, but I am continuing to treat for problemsNo, removal is not neededUnsure

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

⚖️ Who May Qualify for a Breast Mesh Lawsuit?

Our breast mesh injury lawyers are pursuing claims alleging that manufacturers sold these products to surgeons for off-label breast augmentation and reconstruction, while failing to warn that the material could degrade, migrate, or cause chronic inflammation.

Women may qualify for an internal bra lawsuit if they suffered any of the following side effects from breast mesh used during augmentation, lift, or reconstruction surgery:

• Infection or abscess formation
• Chronic pain or nerve injury
• Implant loss or reconstruction failure
• Seroma or fluid buildup
• Skin erosion or tissue necrosis
• Breast asymmetry, deformity, or scarring

To find out if you or a loved one qualify for a breast mesh settlement, call 1-800-522-0102 today or complete the form on this page to request a free case evaluation.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

After a three-day trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a jury awarded the seven-figure verdict to two HVAC technicians represented by Saiontz & Kirk, who fell approximately 20 feet when a wooden box used to lift them to a rooftop by forklift suddenly collapsed.

Maryland Forklift Fall Accident Case

The incident occurred on June 2, 2020, when the plaintiffs were dispatched to Caribbean Crescent’s DeSoto Road facility to repair a rooftop refrigeration unit. Upon arrival, they found no safe access to the roof.

Employees of Caribbean Crescent instructed them to use a wooden box attached to a forklift to reach the elevated work area, assuring the technicians that this lift method was safe and that it had been “regularly used by other technicians” .

After completing the repair, the plaintiffs re-entered the box, which split apart mid-air and collapsed. Both men fell approximately 20 feet, suffering serious and life-altering injuries.

The Verdict

After deliberation, the jury found Caribbean Crescent negligent and awarded :

• Client 1: $577,497.60
• Client 2: $649,760.70
• Total Award: $1,227,258.30

The jury rejected the defendants’ primary defense of assumption of risk, which alleged that the plaintiffs knowingly accepted a dangerous method of access. Instead, the jury found that Caribbean Crescent created and controlled the unsafe conditions and that the plaintiffs reasonably relied on the company’s assurances.

A Significant Victory for Worker Safety

This verdict underscores the responsibility of property owners and businesses to provide safe access methods for contractors and service technicians. The plaintiffs were placed in a position where Caribbean Crescent employees directed them to use a defective system, with no reasonable alternative for safe roof access.

Nichols’ preparation, including extensive review of engineering reports, deposition testimony, safety regulations, and trial strategy, was instrumental in defeating the assumption-of-risk defense and securing a seven-figure award for the plaintiffs.

While the defendants have filed an appeal, Saiontz & Kirk remains confident that the verdict will withstand further review. The firm continues to represent the plaintiffs in all post-trial and appellate proceedings.

Trusted Representation for Workplace Injuries and Serious Accidents

At Saiontz & Kirk, our attorneys have represented injury victims for more than 50 years, recovering over $1.3 billion in settlements for clients nationwide. Our personal injury lawyers have the experience and resources to represent individuals across a wide range of personal injury matters, including:

• Car Accidents
• Truck Accidents
• Motorcycle Accidents
• Worker Injuries
• Slip and Fall Injuries
• Dog Bite Injuries
• Traumatic Brain Injuries
• Nursing Home Neglect
• Medical Malpractice
• Wrongful Death

If you or a loved one has been injured due to someone else’s negligence, contact our injury law firm today to request a free consultation and claim evaluation.

While Sanofi and Regeneron have promoted their drug as a breakthrough treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases, studies now suggest Dupixent side effects may increase the risk of serious blood cancers.

Request a Free Claim Review by a DUPIXENT LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

LinkedIn

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Are you inquiring about yourself or a loved one?*

---MyselfOn behalf of a living family memberOn behalf of a deceased loved one

2. How long did you or a loved one take Dupixent®?*

---Less than 30 Days1 - 6 Months6 - 12 MonthsOver a YearDid not take Dupixent, but I have questions

3. What type of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) was diagnosed?*

---Mycosis Fungoides (CTLC)Sézary Syndrome (CTLC)Another Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTLC) subtypeDiagnosed with another type of cancer or lymphomaNo cancer diagnosis, but I have other questions

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Families who turned to Dupixent for relief from skin or breathing problems are instead confronting unexpected lymphoma diagnoses that were never included in the drug’s warnings.

⚖️ Who May Qualify for a Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit?

Our Dupixent cancer lawyers are investigating claims that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to disclose these risks and deprived patients of the ability to make fully informed decisions about their care.

As a result, we are reviewing cases for individuals who were diagnosed with the following after using Dupixent:

• Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
• Mycosis fungoides
• Sézary syndrome
• Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL)
• Other rare T-cell lymphoma subtypes
• Wrongful death linked to Dupixent-related lymphoma

To find out if you qualify for a Dupixent injury settlement, call 1-800-522-0102 today or complete the form on this page to request a free case evaluation.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

Although Roblox is marketed as a safe and creative space for kids, lawsuits and police investigations reveal that the platform has become a hunting ground for predators.

Request a Free Claim Review by a ROBLOX LAWYER

Δ

• Phone
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
• FIRST NAME:*
• LAST NAME:*
• PRIMARY PHONE:
• ALT. PHONE:
• EMAIL:
• DETAILS ABOUT CASE:

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Weak age verification, open chat systems, and Roblox’s in-game currency Robux have been repeatedly used to exploit and lure children into harmful interactions.

Despite years of warnings from advocacy groups, law enforcement, and families, Roblox has failed to implement meaningful safeguards. As a result, our Roblox lawyers are now pursuing compensation for families of children who experienced:

• Grooming and sextortion involving threats, bribes, or Robux
• Sexual assault, abuse, or trafficking after contact on Roblox
• Coercion to send or exchange explicit images and videos
• Severe psychological harm including PTSD, depression, and suicidal thoughts
• Wrongful death in tragic cases involving suicide linked to abuse.

To find out if your family may qualify for a Roblox lawsuit settlement, request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

Request a Free Claim Review by a TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

Phone

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Where was the tabletop fire pit purchased?*

---AmazonWalmartWayfairOther storeDon't know

2. How long ago did problems with the fire pit occur?*

---Within the past MonthWithin the past Year1-2 Years AgoMore than 2 Years agoNo Problems yet, but I have questions

3. Which of the following best describes the injuries or damages caused by the fire pit*

---Minor burns/injuries, but no medical treatmentBurn injury resulting in doctor or ER visitHospitalized, surgery, or skin grafts for burnsProperty damage only (furniture, home, etc.)No injuries or damage, but I’d like more information

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Although these tabletop fire pits are often marketed as stylish and safe home accessories, they can become deadly when missing key safety features. Many models burn liquid ethanol or alcohol-based gels, which are highly volatile and nearly invisible in daylight. When users attempt to refill a fire pit that appears extinguished but is still hot, the fuel can instantly ignite, causing explosions, flame jetting, and catastrophic burns.

Despite a growing number of injury reports and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recalls, these products were widely sold for years without adequate safety warnings or design safeguards.

As a result, our burn injury lawyers are now pursuing compensation for individuals who experienced serious burn-related injuries such as:

• Second- and third-degree burns
• Permanent scarring and disfigurement
• Nerve damage and loss of mobility
• Inhalation injuries
• Fatal burn injuries

To find out if you qualify for a tabletop fire pit lawsuit settlement, request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today.