Request a Free Claim Review by a SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

0%

Email

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. How long ago was the Spinal Cord Stimulator implanted?*

---0-5 years ago6-10 years agoOver 10 years agoUnsure when implantedDid not have spinal cord stimulator, but have questions

2. Which best describes the complications experienced after the Spinal Cord Stimulator?*

---Burns or shocksDevice migrationLead wires problemsOther malfunction or injuryNo complications, but I have questions

3. Did the complications require medical treatment or surgery (including removal of the device)?*

---Yes, Medical Evaluation or TreatmentYes, Removal SurgeryNo, but I plan to seek treatmentNo treatment or surgery

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Although spinal cord stimulation systems are marketed to manage chronic back and nerve pain, serious risks can arise when lead wires inside the body fracture or malfunction. These thin insulated wires deliver the electrical impulses that interrupt pain signals, and when they break or shift out of position, patients may experience sudden loss of relief, painful shocks, or worsening neurological symptoms.

Despite reports of lead instability, therapy interruption, and device malfunction involving certain systems manufactured by companies such as Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Nevro and others, these devices have remained widely used in chronic pain treatment.

As a result, our spinal cord stimulator lawyers are now pursuing claims for individuals who suffered serious injuries such as:

• Lead wire fracture or migration
• Electrical shocks or overstimulation
• Sudden loss of pain relief
• Worsening chronic back or nerve pain
• Revision surgery or device removal
• Permanent nerve damage
• Long-term spinal cord complications

If you or a loved one experienced complications after one of these pain management devices was implanted, financial compensation may be available through a spinal cord stimulator injury lawsuit. Request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today to speak with a spinal cord stimulator lawyer.

Request a Free Claim Review by a HEATED INSOLE LAWYER

Δ

• Comments
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
• FIRST NAME:*
• LAST NAME:*
• PRIMARY PHONE:
• ALT. PHONE:
• EMAIL:
• DETAILS ABOUT CASE:

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Although heated insoles, electric foot warmers, and heated socks are often marketed as safe and convenient solutions for cold weather, circulation issues, or medical comfort, they can pose serious risks when they malfunction or lack proper safety features. Many of these products rely on lithium-ion batteries and internal heating elements that sit directly against the foot inside enclosed footwear, creating conditions where dangerous heat buildup can occur.

When overheating occurs, users may not feel warning signs in time to prevent serious injury, resulting in severe burns that can worsen before the product is removed.

Despite a growing number of injury reports and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) warnings involving heated insoles sold through Amazon, these products were widely sold for years without adequate safety warnings or design safeguards.

As a result, our burn injury lawyers are now pursuing compensation for individuals who suffered serious injuries such as:

• Second- and third-degree burns to the feet or toes
• Permanent scarring or disfigurement
• Nerve damage or loss of sensation
• Reduced mobility or difficulty walking

To find out if you qualify for a heated insole or foot warmer lawsuit, request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today.

Women across the U.S. are now coming forward after suffering devastating injuries from these widely used mesh devices, which have been sold to plastic surgeons for use as “internal bra” supports, despite never being approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use during breast surgery.

Request a Free Claim Review by a BREAST MESH LAWYER

Δ

• Name
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
• FIRST NAME:*
• LAST NAME:*
• PRIMARY PHONE:
• ALT. PHONE:
• EMAIL:
• DETAILS ABOUT CASE:

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

⚖️ Who May Qualify for a Breast Mesh Lawsuit?

Our breast mesh injury lawyers are pursuing claims alleging that manufacturers sold these products to surgeons for off-label breast augmentation and reconstruction, while failing to warn that the material could degrade, migrate, or cause chronic inflammation.

Women may qualify for an internal bra lawsuit if they suffered any of the following side effects from breast mesh used during augmentation, lift, or reconstruction surgery:

• Infection or abscess formation
• Chronic pain or nerve injury
• Implant loss or reconstruction failure
• Seroma or fluid buildup
• Skin erosion or tissue necrosis
• Breast asymmetry, deformity, or scarring

To find out if you or a loved one qualify for a breast mesh settlement, call 1-800-522-0102 today or complete the form on this page to request a free case evaluation.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

After a three-day trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a jury awarded the seven-figure verdict to two HVAC technicians represented by Saiontz & Kirk, who fell approximately 20 feet when a wooden box used to lift them to a rooftop by forklift suddenly collapsed.

Maryland Forklift Fall Accident Case

The incident occurred on June 2, 2020, when the plaintiffs were dispatched to Caribbean Crescent’s DeSoto Road facility to repair a rooftop refrigeration unit. Upon arrival, they found no safe access to the roof.

Employees of Caribbean Crescent instructed them to use a wooden box attached to a forklift to reach the elevated work area, assuring the technicians that this lift method was safe and that it had been “regularly used by other technicians” .

After completing the repair, the plaintiffs re-entered the box, which split apart mid-air and collapsed. Both men fell approximately 20 feet, suffering serious and life-altering injuries.

The Verdict

After deliberation, the jury found Caribbean Crescent negligent and awarded :

• Client 1: $577,497.60
• Client 2: $649,760.70
• Total Award: $1,227,258.30

The jury rejected the defendants’ primary defense of assumption of risk, which alleged that the plaintiffs knowingly accepted a dangerous method of access. Instead, the jury found that Caribbean Crescent created and controlled the unsafe conditions and that the plaintiffs reasonably relied on the company’s assurances.

A Significant Victory for Worker Safety

This verdict underscores the responsibility of property owners and businesses to provide safe access methods for contractors and service technicians. The plaintiffs were placed in a position where Caribbean Crescent employees directed them to use a defective system, with no reasonable alternative for safe roof access.

Nichols’ preparation, including extensive review of engineering reports, deposition testimony, safety regulations, and trial strategy, was instrumental in defeating the assumption-of-risk defense and securing a seven-figure award for the plaintiffs.

While the defendants have filed an appeal, Saiontz & Kirk remains confident that the verdict will withstand further review. The firm continues to represent the plaintiffs in all post-trial and appellate proceedings.

Trusted Representation for Workplace Injuries and Serious Accidents

At Saiontz & Kirk, our attorneys have represented injury victims for more than 50 years, recovering over $1.3 billion in settlements for clients nationwide. Our personal injury lawyers have the experience and resources to represent individuals across a wide range of personal injury matters, including:

• Car Accidents
• Truck Accidents
• Motorcycle Accidents
• Worker Injuries
• Slip and Fall Injuries
• Dog Bite Injuries
• Traumatic Brain Injuries
• Nursing Home Neglect
• Medical Malpractice
• Wrongful Death

If you or a loved one has been injured due to someone else’s negligence, contact our injury law firm today to request a free consultation and claim evaluation.

While Sanofi and Regeneron have promoted their drug as a breakthrough treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases, studies now suggest Dupixent side effects may increase the risk of serious blood cancers.

Request a Free Claim Review by a DUPIXENT LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

Instagram

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Are you inquiring about yourself or a loved one?*

---MyselfOn behalf of a living family memberOn behalf of a deceased loved one

2. How long did you or a loved one take Dupixent®?*

---Less than 30 Days1 - 6 Months6 - 12 MonthsOver a YearDid not take Dupixent, but I have questions

3. What type of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) was diagnosed?*

---Mycosis Fungoides (CTLC)Sézary Syndrome (CTLC)Another Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTLC) subtypeDiagnosed with another type of cancer or lymphomaNo cancer diagnosis, but I have other questions

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Families who turned to Dupixent for relief from skin or breathing problems are instead confronting unexpected lymphoma diagnoses that were never included in the drug’s warnings.

⚖️ Who May Qualify for a Dupixent Cancer Lawsuit?

Our Dupixent cancer lawyers are investigating claims that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to disclose these risks and deprived patients of the ability to make fully informed decisions about their care.

As a result, we are reviewing cases for individuals who were diagnosed with the following after using Dupixent:

• Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL)
• Mycosis fungoides
• Sézary syndrome
• Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL)
• Other rare T-cell lymphoma subtypes
• Wrongful death linked to Dupixent-related lymphoma

To find out if you qualify for a Dupixent injury settlement, call 1-800-522-0102 today or complete the form on this page to request a free case evaluation.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

Although Roblox is marketed as a safe and creative space for kids, lawsuits and police investigations reveal that the platform has become a hunting ground for predators.

Request a Free Claim Review by a ROBLOX LAWYER

Δ

• Email
  This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
• FIRST NAME:*
• LAST NAME:*
• PRIMARY PHONE:
• ALT. PHONE:
• EMAIL:
• DETAILS ABOUT CASE:

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Weak age verification, open chat systems, and Roblox’s in-game currency Robux have been repeatedly used to exploit and lure children into harmful interactions.

Despite years of warnings from advocacy groups, law enforcement, and families, Roblox has failed to implement meaningful safeguards. As a result, our Roblox lawyers are now pursuing compensation for families of children who experienced:

• Grooming and sextortion involving threats, bribes, or Robux
• Sexual assault, abuse, or trafficking after contact on Roblox
• Coercion to send or exchange explicit images and videos
• Severe psychological harm including PTSD, depression, and suicidal thoughts
• Wrongful death in tragic cases involving suicide linked to abuse.

To find out if your family may qualify for a Roblox lawsuit settlement, request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

Request a Free Claim Review by a TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

Facebook

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Where was the tabletop fire pit purchased?*

---AmazonWalmartWayfairOther storeDon't know

2. How long ago did problems with the fire pit occur?*

---Within the past MonthWithin the past Year1-2 Years AgoMore than 2 Years agoNo Problems yet, but I have questions

3. Which of the following best describes the injuries or damages caused by the fire pit*

---Minor burns/injuries, but no medical treatmentBurn injury resulting in doctor or ER visitHospitalized, surgery, or skin grafts for burnsProperty damage only (furniture, home, etc.)No injuries or damage, but I’d like more information

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Although these tabletop fire pits are often marketed as stylish and safe home accessories, they can become deadly when missing key safety features. Many models burn liquid ethanol or alcohol-based gels, which are highly volatile and nearly invisible in daylight. When users attempt to refill a fire pit that appears extinguished but is still hot, the fuel can instantly ignite, causing explosions, flame jetting, and catastrophic burns.

Despite a growing number of injury reports and U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recalls, these products were widely sold for years without adequate safety warnings or design safeguards.

As a result, our burn injury lawyers are now pursuing compensation for individuals who experienced serious burn-related injuries such as:

• Second- and third-degree burns
• Permanent scarring and disfigurement
• Nerve damage and loss of mobility
• Inhalation injuries
• Fatal burn injuries

To find out if you qualify for a tabletop fire pit lawsuit settlement, request a free case evaluation or call 1-800-522-0102 today.

Although nitrous oxide canisters were once limited to dental and culinary uses, the products are now flooding vape shops, smoke stores, and online marketplaces in brightly colored packages that are clearly intended to target young people for recreational inhalation to get a quick and cheap high.

Request a Free Claim Review by an NITROUS OXIDE LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

Comments

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. At what age was Galaxy Gas or other nitrous oxide products first used?*

---Under 18 Years Old18-21 Years Old22-30 Years OldOver 30 Years OldDid not inhale nitrous oxide, but have other questions

2. Did nitrous oxide use result in injuries requiring hospitalization?*

---YesNoUnsure

3. Was paralysis experienced after using nitrous oxide?*

---Yes, I experienced temporary paralysis, but it has resolvedYes, I am currently experiencing temporary or partial paralysisYes, I have permanent paralysisNo, I have not experienced any paralysis

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

Despite FDA warnings and a growing number of injury reports, these gas canisters are often packaged with flavored scents, flashy branding, and social media campaigns glamorizing “whippet” use at parties. What starts as a curiosity can quickly lead to addiction, severe nerve damage, and even death.

Our nitrous oxide injury lawyers are investigating lawsuits against manufacturers and distributors that marketed these products in a way that encouraged misuse while failing to warn about the serious risks involved.

Individuals and families may be entitled to pursue a nitrous oxide lawsuit if they or a loved one:

• Used or inhaled nitrous oxide recreationally
• Suffered death from asphyxiation or blood clots
• Experienced permanent paralysis or limb dysfunction
• Were diagnosed with a vitamin B12 deficiency requiring lifelong treatment
• Were hospitalized for heart palpitations, loss of consciousness, bowel or bladder dysfunction, or partial paralysis
• Were injured or lost a loved one in an accident caused by someone under the influence of nitrous oxide

If you or someone you love suffered neurological injury, paralysis, or wrongful death linked to nitrous oxide use or intoxication, contact Saiontz & Kirk for a free, confidential case evaluation by calling 1-800-522-0102 or submitting the form on this page.

Mobile sports betting platforms have flooded the market in recent years, aggressively targeting young adults and students through social media, campus promotions, and influencer advertising.

Request a Free Claim Review by an SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWYER

"*" indicates required fields

Step 1 of 2

50%

URL

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

1. Estimated losses from sports betting / gambling apps:*

---Under $10,000$10,000 to $25,000$25,000 to $50,000$50,000 to $100,000Over $100,000No Gambling Losses, but have other questions

2. Age when first started using sports betting / gambling apps:*

---Under 1818 to 21 years old22 to 25 years old26 to 30 years oldOver 30 years old

3. Has there been any medical treatment or counseling related to gambling addiction?:*

---Yes, diagnosed gambling disorderYes, treatment/counseling related to gambling lossesNo, but I intend to get counselingNo, but I have other questions

Provide your contact information below to receive your free consultation and claim evaluation.

First Name:*

Last Name:*

Phone Number:*

Email:*

Details About Case:*

SMS Consent

I agree and consent to the conditions below.

By checking this box and clicking "Submit", you agree to the Terms & Conditions* of this website and expressly consent to receive calls, text messages or other communications to the numbers provided, even if listed on any Do Not Call registry.

Contact may be made by or on behalf of Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. or their co-counsel, regarding this inquiry or marketing for other legal matters. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services, but if you do not consent you must call Saiontz & Kirk, LLC. directly at 1-800-522-0102. Msg/data rates may apply, text HELP for help or STOP to cancel.

*By submitting, you authorize Saiontz & Kirk to send text messages to the numbers provided, including information & offers, possibly using automated technology. Message/data rates apply. Consent is not a condition for acceptance of services.

While these apps claim to support “responsible gaming,” growing evidence suggests they are designed to foster compulsive behavior, pushing users toward repeat deposits, mounting debt, and in some cases, emotional breakdowns or suicidal ideation.

Our sports gambling addiction lawyers are now investigating claims against major sportsbook operators for designing apps that exploit user psychology, blur financial risk, and encourage prolonged gambling among vulnerable populations.

If you or a loved one developed a gambling addiction or experienced financial harm from using online betting apps, a sports gambling lawsuit may help you seek compensation for:

• Gambling losses or debts totaling $10,000 or more
• Credit damage caused by compulsive betting
• Academic setbacks or school withdrawal due to gambling-related stress
• Emotional distress, anxiety, or suicidal thoughts
• Counseling or addiction treatment expenses

To see if you qualify for a settlement, request a free case evaluation with a sports gambling addiction lawyer today or call us toll-free at 1-800-522-0102.

Our lawyers work on a contingency fee basis, which means there are never any fees or expenses unless a recovery is obtained in your case.

A recent court decision threatens to weaken this rule, making it harder for vulnerable road users to hold drivers accountable. Below, we explain what the Boulevard Rule is, how it applies to pedestrian and bicycle crash cases, and why it matters more now than ever.

What Is the Maryland Boulevard Rule?

The Boulevard Rule is a longstanding legal doctrine in Maryland that governs who has the right-of-way at certain types of intersections, specifically, where one road is designated as a “through highway” or boulevard. The rule is codified in Maryland Transportation Articles §§ 21-403, 21-404, and 21-705(c).

Under the Boulevard Rule:

• Drivers entering or crossing a boulevard must come to a complete stop and yield to all traffic already on the through road.
• Drivers already on the boulevard, this including pedestrians and cyclists lawfully in crosswalks, have the right-of-way and are not expected to anticipate others violating traffic laws.
• If an unfavored driver causes a crash by failing to yield, they are generally considered negligent as a matter of law.

This rule has been a cornerstone of Maryland traffic law for decades. It helps ensure clarity at intersections and provides protection to road users who follow the rules, especially those at greatest physical risk in a crash.

What’s Changing, and Why It Matters?

In a recent case, the Appellate Court of Maryland signaled a potential departure from this long-standing precedent. The court opened the door for favored drivers, particularly pedestrians and cyclists using designated crossings or while traveling on the Boulevard, to be found contributorily negligent under less extraordinary circumstances.

This shift is alarming. Vulnerable road users already face disproportionate risks on streets designed primarily for motor vehicles. If courts begin to erode the protections afforded under the Boulevard Rule, these users may find themselves unfairly blamed in crashes where they had the right-of-way.

The Stakes for Pedestrians and Cyclists

Maryland has taken legislative steps to protect VRUs through initiatives like the Strategic Highway Safety Plan and proposed legislation such as House Bill 594, which introduces comparative negligence in certain motor vehicle accidents involving vulnerable individuals.

But if judicial decisions do not align with these efforts, such protections may prove hollow. Cyclists and pedestrians are already navigating a transportation system not built with their safety in mind. When the law shifts to blame them, even when they are following the rules, it compounds an already dangerous situation.

An amicus brief (PDF) that I recently filed on behalf of Bikemore, a Baltimore-based nonprofit that advocates for safer biking and walking infrastructure, highlights the impact of eroding the Maryland boulevard rule for pedestrians, cyclists and other injury victims:

“The disparity in physical protection and safety technology between VRUs and modern motor vehicles leaves little margin for error and few, if any, second chances.”

Why the Boulevard Rule Should Be Strengthened, Not Weakened

When VRUs are lawfully using Maryland’s roads and have the right-of-way, the legal system must continue to hold motorists to a high standard. The Boulevard Rule has historically served that function. Weakening it sends the wrong message at a time when our state is encouraging more sustainable, pedestrian- and cyclist-friendly modes of transportation.

Clarifying and reinforcing the Boulevard Rule is not just a matter of legal consistency, it’s a public safety imperative.

Why It Matters for Injury Claims

If you’re hit while walking or biking, whether you can recover damages may depend in part on how the courts interpret the Boulevard Rule. Historically, Maryland courts have rarely allowed contributory negligence claims against favored drivers. But if that changes, so does your ability to hold a driver accountable, even if you were lawfully using the road.

This makes it critical to work with a law firm that understands the nuances of Maryland traffic law and how rules like the Boulevard Rule can impact your case.

Moving Forward

Our team of Maryland personal injury lawyers represent individuals who are often at a disadvantage when navigating the aftermath of a crash. As this issue evolves in Maryland’s courts, we remain committed to advocating for legal protections that reflect the realities of our roads, especially for those without the protection of a vehicle.

If you or someone you love has been involved in a crash as a pedestrian, cyclist, or other vulnerable road user, and you believe your rights were not respected, our experienced legal team is here to help.

Contact us today at 1-800-522-0102 to discuss your options and understand how Maryland law, including the Boulevard Rule, may affect your case.