[mobile site, backup mobile]
[Calitics en espanol]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
August 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * * 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services

ProgressiveCA Blogs

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Rep. Adam Schiff (CA-29) Introduces Gonzo No-Confidence Resolution In The House

by: Todd Beeton

Mon May 21, 2007 at 11:39:22 AM PDT


I wanted to take this opportunity to praise my congressman, Adam Schiff. He's technically a blue dog and if I have one complaint about him it's that he plays it way too safe for no apparent reason -- he won 64% of the vote last year. So, lately, it's been nice to see him step up (with votes in support of withdrawal from Iraq and an amendment to the Intelligence Authorization Bill to strengthen FISA) and step out into the spotlight on USAGate.

As a former assistant US Attorney in Los Angeles and a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Schiff has brought his expertise and credibility to bear in the Gonzalez hearings (notably telling Gonzalez he felt he should resign to his face.) Today, Congressman Schiff has introduced the House version of the no-confidence resolution against Gonzalez.

More over the flip.

Todd Beeton :: Rep. Adam Schiff (CA-29) Introduces Gonzo No-Confidence Resolution In The House
According to Raw Story, the resolution reads:

Resolved: That the House of Representatives and the American people have lost confidence in Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and urge the President to request his resignation and to nominate a new candidate more capable of serving as head of the Department of Justice.

In a statement, Schiff said:

"I have been deeply disappointed in Mr. Gonzales's mismanagement of the Justice Department, his conflicting statements and testimony, and the low regard he seems to have for the professionals in his charge."

As you can see from this blog entry from his website, Schiff takes this matter very personally.

I told the Attorney General that I spent six years in the Justice Department, that I loved my time in that department and the department itself, and that I was ill over what the Justice Department had become under his tenure. I also told him that to claim, as he did, that there was nothing improper in firing a U.S. Attorney - in firing a good prosecutor - for no other reason than to make way to put someone else there and pad their resume, for the Attorney General to say that reflected a level of disrespect towards his own staff that I found deeply disturbing. I told the Attorney General that I thought the department was broken, that I did not think that he was the one to fix it. I also told him that I thought he should resign. I have never called for a Cabinet official to resign in their presence, but by setting the bar for the department so low, I think the Attorney General left me no choice.

Conventional wisdom is that a vote of no-confidence is much more likely to pass in the Senate than in the House but if Sen. Specter is correct, the mere prospect of a no-confidence vote may be enough to incite Gonzo's resignation.

Thanks, Rep. Schiff for keeping the pressure on this sorry excuse for an Attorney General.

And in a related story, you can help call for Gonzalez's impeachment HERE.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
So what's the over/under? (0.00 / 0)
I say Friday.  Holiday weekend and all. Over or under?

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK

I'm thinking earlier in the week (0.00 / 0)
I'll take Weds.

[ Parent ]
Friday is just too perfect (0.00 / 0)
I'd say late afternoon, D.C. time, just before everybody goes off for Memorial Day vacation. It's a perfect time for the White House. And I'm guessing that they will nominate somebody at the same time.

Shouldn't 3 strikes apply to Arnold? Strike 1, Strike 2, Strike 3. Life Sentence!

[ Parent ]
I don't know (0.00 / 0)
Bush dug in his heels more today.

Gonzales is a) a firewall for Rove, and b) not someone who will be replaced easily, because it requires Senate confirmation.  They can't even replace McNulty.  One candidate said "I'd rather trade places with Jose Padilla."

They'd WELCOME an impeachment battle over Abu G, because it would set up a confrontational "us-vs.-them" thing that they think would rally the base.  I don't think Bush will be so quick to cut him loose, even though he obviously should.


[ Parent ]
can he be disbarred? (0.00 / 0)
Seems like trying to get a signature from someone not in possession of their faculties is the kind of thing that could get you disbarred.

Mr. Brian esq., any input on that?

I'm NOT saying that's all he deserves, but just looking at all our options for getting rid of this guy.


Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Blog Network:

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Powered by: SoapBlox