[mobile site, backup mobile]
[Calitics en espanol]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
October 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services

ProgressiveCA Blogs

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

On Blogging under a nom de pixel

by: Brian Leubitz

Thu Jul 19, 2007 at 15:26:03 PM PDT


First, I think it is obvious that we allow anonymous, well, actually pseudonymous, blogging here. There are a number of bloggers at varying levels of anonymity here.  For my own part, I began this site as sfbriancl, a derivative of my name (The C standing for Charles, the SF for...uh...SF). And jsw, well, those are Jeremy's initials. Juls seems pretty easy to link to Julia Rosen, same with dday. Lucas was Lucas from the get-go.  And we also gave you most of that information in the About Page. But, I guess there was still enough to attack on the basis of anonymity.

Flip it over, please...

Brian Leubitz :: On Blogging under a nom de pixel
Most, if not all, of the "A-list" Bloggers (I don't want to get into that, but just read this Republic of T post for more on that) are in fact open about their identity at this point. Heck, even Digby came out of the closet. And here at Calitics, that is now the case as well, as we have had a big shift in the past week towards using real names.  I think that's cool. You see, it's not that there isn't value in using the pseudonym, it just gives people a bit more trust if they see that real name.

That being said, there is a very real place for pseudonymous blogging. Heck, even Jon Fleischman understands that there is a place for non-attributed blogging.  It could be because a paying job doesn't want you taking political stances, or it could be shielding grassroots friends. Whatever, if you have a reason, and you can still get your point of view across to an audience, I wish you the best.  But one thing that should not be tolerated is the "outing" of a pseudonymous blogger by somebody who was supposed to be on the same team.

I won't get into the details, other than the fact that here in California, a really cool person was outed by somebody that had no business doing so.  That incident hurt both sides, and little was gained, other than showing that old school politics aren't dead.  Leaders should know who their friends are, but it's painfully clear that some demand perfect loyalty and drones to the cause (ie themselves).  Folks, it's not going to happen. You will sooner tame a zebra (look it up...you can't do it) than you will the blogosphere.  You have friends, but sometimes those friends will *gasp* disagree with you.  Get over it and move on.

So, I guess what I'm saying is that if you can be out front about who you are, you should do so. But if you can't, well, your "friends" should respect that.  And hey, if anybody wants to change their username, shoot me an email.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I would change my username (8.00 / 1)
But Be_Devine is so much cooler than Brian Devine.  That and I don't want Carole's people to track me down at my workplace.  Oops, did I just give away my real name.  Damn!

I'm one of the few (0.00 / 0)
whose pseudonym isn't connected to my real name.  And since I'm getting increasingly involved in state politics, I wanted to identify myself.

Way I see it (8.00 / 1)
If pseudonymity was good enough for the Founding Fathers it's good enough for us, should we choose it.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave

You wacky traditionalist, you. (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
I'm more public now (0.00 / 0)
Sure, a front-page story in the San Francisco Chronicle made it clear who I am, but I had our fearless leader update my account to just use my name (which in my case, isn't even my real name as I'm documented as a Robert, but none theless). Also, I posted a diary on my username, which I'll miss.

- John McCain

Always used my real name (0.00 / 0)
on whatever site I'm on: my own blog, here, Liberal OC, MySpace, LiveJournal, etc.

The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves - Plato, philosopher (427-347 BCE)

I've always felt the need (0.00 / 0)
to not exactly hide behind my pseudonym but to make sure any weirdos have to at least do a little work to find me if they're going to stalk me. I'm tface or terry just about everywhere, but I'll tell anyone that asks nice or with a need to know who I am.

Yeah (0.00 / 0)
But really, it's ok to admit it. Everyone was just tired of me getting all the credit.

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK

Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Blog Network:

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Powered by: SoapBlox