[mobile site, backup mobile]
[SoapBlox Help]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
November 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * * * * 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services
Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Vote November 4!

Progressive Punch: Jerry McNerney ranks 195th of 232

by: Brian Leubitz

Tue Oct 02, 2007 at 15:43:59 PM PDT


Woohoo! Jerry did it! Jerry McNerney has managed to become the most un-progressive Democrat of the entire California congressional delegation. For those keeping score at home, Jerry's 82.45 was about a half point lower than the next CA Dem, Jim Costa, that progressive stalwart, at 82.97. And for all the talk of Harman changing her ways, she's still worse than even Joe Baca, almost 7 points worse from a very safe Dem seat.

For all of you CA-45 fans, "moderate" Mary Bono came in with a stellar 4.42 Chips are Down score. So, for all the bluster of the SCHIP vote, she's still dancing the same jig as the rest of her party.

On thing must be said, the Speaker has done an excellent job at preserving unity amongst the caucus. Whether that means she's being too incremental and/or ineffective, or just laying down the law is the big question. The reason her approval rating, and the Congress in general, is down has a whole lot to do with the fact that little has changed on the Iraq front. So, would it be better to have a speaker who is more willing to take risks? Perhaps, but the impediment of the president always lingers over her head, veto pen in hand. So, whether the unity is really there, is an open question. Full data over the flip.

Brian Leubitz :: Progressive Punch: Jerry McNerney ranks 195th of 232
Rank Name 07-08 All-time ChipsAreDown Party State
1 Pelosi, Nancy 100.00 93.58 100.00 D CA
3 Sánchez, Linda T. 98.97 96.45 98.43 D CA
6 Lee, Barbara 98.45 96.99 97.18 D CA
9 Capps, Lois 98.28 88.95 97.49 D CA
13 Solis, Hilda L. 97.94 95.77 96.24 D CA
18 Richardson, Laura 97.83 97.83 96.43 D CA
23 Woolsey, Lynn C. 97.57 94.69 95.92 D CA
24 Filner, Bob 97.55 94.02 95.91 D CA
25 Matsui, Doris O. 97.42 94.46 95.30 D CA
26 Becerra, Xavier 97.33 92.41 95.19 D CA
37 Farr, Sam 96.72 90.66 94.98 D CA
39 Honda, Michael M. 96.63 94.39 94.67 D CA
51 Roybal-Allard, Lucille 96.39 92.79 94.03 D CA
55 Lofgren, Zoe 96.34 87.42 94.65 D CA
56 Tauscher, Ellen O. 96.23 83.14 93.10 D CA
58 Napolitano, Grace F. 96.17 90.68 93.42 D CA
63 Schiff, Adam B. 95.88 86.79 92.45 D CA
68 Waters, Maxine 95.77 93.38 93.31 D CA
71 Miller, George 95.72 93.67 93.20 D CA
73 Davis, Susan A. 95.70 87.53 93.10 D CA
77 Eshoo, Anna G. 95.64 88.63 93.38 D CA
82 Sherman, Brad 95.52 84.99 92.79 D CA
88 Berman, Howard L. 95.28 87.56 92.38 D CA
88 Watson, Diane E. 95.28 92.71 91.80 D CA
97 Thompson, Mike 95.01 85.33 93.42 D CA
102 Lantos, Tom 94.74 87.73 90.51 D CA
104 Sanchez, Loretta 94.49 84.58 90.19 D CA
114 Baca, Joe 94.16 82.91 90.28 D CA
127 Waxman, Henry A. 93.63 91.96 89.49 D CA
153 Stark, Fortney Pete 92.02 93.12 87.74 D CA
178 Cardoza, Dennis A. 90.09 77.80 84.86 D CA
179 Harman, Jane 89.82 76.91 83.86 D CA
187 Costa, Jim 89.22 78.46 82.97 D CA
195 McNerney, Jerry 87.63 87.63 82.45 D CA
274 Lewis, Jerry 18.40 10.68 4.73 R CA
283 Bono, Mary 16.01 11.32 4.42 R CA
295 Doolittle, John T. 12.72 4.44 1.57 R CA
313 Calvert, Ken 10.39 5.41 0.95 R CA
322 Hunter, Duncan 8.85 5.38 1.32 R CA
330 Gallegly, Elton 7.60 5.89 1.89 R CA
342 Rohrabacher, Dana 6.67 7.73 4.08 R CA
346 Dreier, David 6.38 5.19 2.51 R CA
352 Bilbray, Brian P. 6.07 13.85 3.77 R CA
356 McKeon, Howard P. ``Buck'' 5.91 3.87 1.27 R CA
370 Herger, Wally 4.92 3.30 0.95 R CA
373 Lungren, Daniel E. 4.81 4.43 1.25 R CA
376 Radanovich, George 4.60 3.65 1.27 R CA
378 Issa, Darrell E. 4.36 4.52 1.27 R CA
380 Miller, Gary G. 4.18 2.45 1.25 R CA
384 Nunes, Devin 4.01 3.30 0.31 R CA
385 McCarthy, Kevin 3.97 3.97 0.63 R CA
388 Royce, Edward R. 3.49 6.55 1.26 R CA
394 Campbell, John 3.12 3.77 2.85 R CA
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Has Tauscher gotten religion? (0.00 / 0)
Did Ellen feel a primary scare or what.  She is voting better than many our so-called progressive heroes.

most improved (0.00 / 0)
The spread of her lifetime to this congress scores is the best.

- John McCain

[ Parent ]
Ah, but (0.00 / 0)
Percentage wise, most improved is...

John Doolittle?

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK


[ Parent ]
And hey, while we're at it (0.00 / 0)
Number 352 there is a pretty stark change.

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK

I gotta say... (8.00 / 1)
it's pretty scary that Jerry is just 2 Congress Members away from John Doolittle...

This thing isn't over yet!!! Charlie Brown for Congress!!!

FYI: You read the list incorrectly (0.00 / 0)
Jerry is 100 positions away from Doolittle. Let's not beat up on him here needlessly please.

[ Parent ]
Um (0.00 / 0)
Since it's a list of the california delegation only, not so incorrect.

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK

[ Parent ]
Please it's a manipulation... (2.00 / 1)
Even the author of this thread agreed she misinterpreted it. 100 positions away is quite a gap!

[ Parent ]
Well it's not a manipulation (5.00 / 1)
for a California-focused blog to put up a post about California representatives.  The accusation of such is uncalled for.

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK

[ Parent ]
Apologies... (0.00 / 0)
you're right, I read the chart wrong, he is 100 away from Doolittle...I didn't realize that it was just the CA delegation.

I would never needlessly beat him up, I still respect him, but even if it is just the CA delegation, that's still too close for comfort.

This thing isn't over yet!!! Charlie Brown for Congress!!!


[ Parent ]
Jerry Failed to make the Progressive Patriots 20 Freshmen list (5.00 / 1)
Russ Feingold's Progressive Patriots Fund, which helped tremendously in the victory over Pombo, has not selected Jerry McNerney to its list of 20 Freshmen who stood with Russ to end the Iraq War. List here.

Brian Leubitz for California Democratic Party Vice-Chair.

Now that is sad... (5.00 / 1)
we fought hard to get a contribution from Feingold and they even had a Progressive Patriot Corps staffer working on the ground for the state party last cycle in CA-11.

He also represents the most... (5.00 / 1)
Republican Democratic-held seat in the State, at PVI R+3.  And in 2008, he won't be running against Dick Pombo.  Say what you will about McNerney but there isn't much gained (either for him or progressives) by being a progressive all-star one-term Congressman.  And 82.45 is a lot better than what Republican representation would bring this district.

Exactly... (0.00 / 0)
I never thought I'd agree with you on something, but I do on this

The Silent Consensus

[ Parent ]
How do we know it'd hurt him in his district? (6.50 / 2)
Is Tracy not against this war? Do voters in Pleasanton insist he condemn MoveOn? Voters in CA-11 aren't exactly Berkeley radicals, but we have to assume they turned to McNerney for a reason: they wanted change.

The basic belief behind progressive politics is that it DOES appeal to voters in places like CA-11, that it's not just something concocted by the left wing just for other left wingers. It has deep roots in some very old American ideas, traditions that have been around in politics for some time. And so it's reasonable to assume that our ideas, our politics, can gain support in a place like the Central Valley.

With McNerney in particular, the goal wasn't to have a Blue Dog in a R+3 district. It was to have someone who was close to, if not always entirely OF, our politics. It was to take CA-11 and turn it into something like D+3.

The voting behavior of a district is rarely fixed in stone, otherwise SF wouldn't have stopped sending Republicans to Sacramento 30 years ago. A good Congressman who is able to sell Democratic values to his or her district is a tried and true method of making that kind of long-term change.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
All I'm saying... (0.00 / 0)
is that progressives should at least appreciate the bind that McNerney is in.  Being a freshman congressman in a tough district when you scraped by against a is a damn tricky situation.  There are strong reasons to avoid any situation that might make a great attack ad.  Period. 

My goal in getting McNerney elected was getting a Democrat elected.  82 is better than 5.  Hell, a 5 who voted for Nancy Pelosi would be better than 5 who didn't.  Beyond that, I don't think much matters.


[ Parent ]
I concur (0.00 / 0)
And frankly and as I told Jerry, your reelection will be tougher than your '06 race. Clear this hurdle and you'll get some measure of security.

[ Parent ]
I think most do appreciate his vulnerability (8.00 / 2)
But also that McNerney doesn't have to respond to this situation by becoming a Blue Dog. There's nothing that says the only way he can keep his seat is by voting to continue the Iraq War - that's not how he won in 2006.

Further, it's not that anyone here openly wishes for McNerney to lose. He's in office now and can expect other sources of support in his bid for reelection, whereas our resources are finite. Our goal is to not just put any old Democrat into office, but to instead put the right ones into office, to direct what we do have to the people who will vote with us instead of against us. Not endorsing McNerney or taking him off the ActBlue page is not the same as saying "we hope you lose" - it's saying "we would rather direct our resources elsewhere as you haven't earned our support." It's a tactic done all the time by labor unions.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations