[mobile site, backup mobile]
[Calitics en espanol]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
October 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services

ProgressiveCA Blogs

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Oops! We didn't really balance the budget after all

by: Brian Leubitz

Wed Oct 10, 2007 at 07:35:50 AM PDT


(back up after some minor fixes. - promoted by Brian Leubitz)

You know that extended standoff on the state budget over the summer? That colossal waste of time? Well, it turns out they didn't even get the numbers right. Shocking, I know.

"It's fair to say the revenue situation is not going to be as good as we had hoped," Finance Director Mike Genest said in a recent interview. "It's likely the $6.1 billion (projected operating deficit) will be higher."

Of course, we knew this was coming. When you play games with numbers, you end up losing in the end. While it is clear that what should be happening here is the reinstatement of the Vehicle License Fee (VLF) to overcome much of these deficits, that doesn't seem likely to happen anytime soon.  

Part of this is just fluctuations in income and sales tax receipts. That's going to happen sometimes. The Finance Dept. tends to wear rose colored glasses on its projections. It kinda has to lie to the Legislature/Governor to get things done in some ritualistic dance they've been doing ever since the late 90s when the Davis Administration thought it would be a great idea to cut taxes. But, of course, that's not it. We've bet on winning a bunch of lawsuits and getting a ton of money for basically selling off EdFund, California's student loan program, and the lottery.  Flip it for some of our losing bets... 

Brian Leubitz :: Oops! We didn't really balance the budget after all
[S]everal of the assumptions that went into the current $102 billion spending plan -- such as a $1 billion sale of EdFund -- are considered shaky. A Department of Finance memo listed several "threats" to the budget, including the sale of the state's student loan guarantor, which it acknowledges "could slip" beyond this fiscal year. The sale of EdFund is among over a dozen issues and lawsuits that could easily wipe out the state's $4.1 billion reserve projected when the budget was approved. Already, the state has had to dip into the reserve to repay $500 million for a court judgment over a supplemental fund for 63,000 retired schoolteachers.

* * *

In the fiscal year that closed June 30, the state fell $821 million below what it had anticipated to collect from its three major taxes -- personal income, sales, and corporate -- than it had projected just six weeks earlier. The trend appears to be continuing. During July and August, the state fell $308 million below forecast in those three taxes. If receipts continue to fall below what the state anticipated for the rest of the year, California could come up $2.5 billion below what was projected based on averaging the tax receipts from the last five months available.

We really have nobody to blame but ourselves on this one. We played with fire on the projections and got burned. It happens. When you put yourself in a constant strain to pay for services by tying your hands on revenue, you have to deal with these problems.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
On the notion (0.00 / 0)
that we shouldn't play with fire on projections and need to balance the budget, I completely agree with you. Would you also agree that raising taxes should only be done after looking at the spending side and determining if any waste, fraud, abuse, or inefficiency is present and taking care of that?

The Silent Consensus

May I add (0.00 / 0)
Other losing bets:

1. Ignoring prison guard contract offer: at LEAST $330 million.

2. According to the LAO, $190 million of overstated property tax revenues.

3. According to the LAO, $184 million of overstated tribal gaming revenue

4. Postponing OWED payments to local governments for mandate relief: $300 million

5. Taking $357 million that was scheduled, in 2008-2009, to pay OWED settlement costs and using it for general fund spending.

6. Using $250 million of the Williams School Facility Repair funds for general fund expenditures.

7. EPSDT prior year deficiency deferral: $260 million.

8. Expecting $709 million in escheated property DEFYING THE COURT'S ORDER.

9. The state lost the "Limited Liability" court case on the lower level and will likely lose on the appellate level. The state is ignoring that likelihood and the $200 million liability going with it.

10. Assuming the federal government will renew the Medi-Cal FPACT waiver when significant reason exists that it will not: $300 million

The Silent Consensus


Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Blog Network:

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Powered by: SoapBlox