[mobile site, backup mobile]
[Calitics en espanol]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
October 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services

ProgressiveCA Blogs

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

History by Jeff Denham

by: Lucas O'Connor

Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 14:46:25 PM PDT


Disclosure: I work for the Courage Campaign

Cross posted at Courage Campaign

Jeff Denham's first tv ad is up and running, and it's striking a familiar "how dare you" tone, but mixing in a new bit of "you want me on that wall, you NEED me on that wall."  Via Capitol Alert, is the transcript as delivered by former Secretary of State Bill Jones:

The recall was launched against Sen. Jeff Denham for one reason only.

He refused to vote for a budget billions out of balance. But then the non-partisan Legislative Analyst proved him right, forecasting an additional $10 billion in red ink.

Local newspapers label this recall an "Abuse of the ballot box." (The Monterey County Herald 2/17/2008)

-- a "sham." (The Madera Tribune, 3/21/2008)

"Petty politics" (Hollister Freelance 2/19/2008)

And "Unjustified" (Fresno Bee 3/20/2008)

Saying this recall is "Just plain wrong." (Merced Sun-Star 2/11/2008)

I agree. Vote No on the Recall.

At some point between last fall and now, Denham and Republicans forcing their budgetary priorities on the Democratic majority has turned into Republicans standing strong in the face of fiscal irresponsibility. At least in Jeff Denham's head.  If Denham really wants to hold himself up as a paragon of budgetary virtue, he might need to answer a few questions.  Like why he keeps accepting pay raises even though he proudly/loudly opposes them.  He also better start coming up with an actual defense for why he stood in lockstep with his GOP brethren in sacrifice of his (supposed) legislative priorities:

Lucas O'Connor :: History by Jeff Denham
As proposed, this budget contains much of what Denham wants, including full funding of education. He has been a strong advocate for schools, a position that has found favor with the powerful teachers union and with parents. It also has contributed to his reputation as a reasonable moderate and helped him win easy re-election last fall.

The Assembly and Senate Democrats have agreed to the spending plan, as has Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican. The holdup - and holdouts - are the Senate Republicans, including Denham.

That's right- once upon a time Jeff Denham was a champion of education.  Then somewhere along the way he gave up serving the people of his district in favor of party loyalty.  And since the revenue cuts forced last year by Republicans have turned into pink slips for teachers this year, it's a pretty stark contrast of priorities.  What could have inspired such a swing? The same article has a theory:

Because of term limits, he cannot run again for the Senate. He has filed the paperwork to run for lieutenant governor in 2010. It appears he is sticking with his hard-line GOP colleagues in order to curry favor with stalwart Republicans whose approval would be essential in his quest to win his party's nomination for statewide office.

Party over the people.  It's not surprising news from the same folks that birthed the Yacht Party of course, but somehow it's still mindboggling.  Granted it's delusional, but at least the new ad is a half-step away from hollow righteous indignation.  Unfortunately, Denham still can't seem to shake this lame and worthless "I don't deserve it" crap.  If Senator Denham doesn't like being held up as the poster child for Republican legislative failures, he might have wanted to consider not personifying them.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
History by Jeff Denham | 4 comments
yes (0.00 / 0)
this is the same kind of up-is-down-ism associated with this Bush Dog Mayor of Turlock who appeared with Denham today:

Turlock Mayor John Lazaar announced his staunch support of Senator Denham, expressing the sentiments of many other supporters:

 "As a Valley Democrat I've always looked for qualities in my state leaders that reflect our community's interests and values," Lazaar said.  "Jeff Denham is this kind of individual.  I do not support a recall of our state senator.  Jeff has done nothing wrong other than to vote no on a flawed state budget last year.  In fact, as a former Stanislaus County Democratic Party Chair I resent the fact that outside interests are trying to tell us who we can or cannot have as our representative in the legislature.

Yes, the budget was flawed, in that it did not reflect the structural imbalance that will always bring needed revenue up short.  And Denham SUPPORTED that.  And that's why we're where we are today.


The strength of contrarianism (0.00 / 0)
As long as Denham can keep saying he opposed the budget, it'll give him false but somewhat effective cover as it all hits the fan now.

"We need men who can dream of things that never were." -JFK

[ Parent ]
Schwarzenegger changed everything (0.00 / 0)
For most of my voting life, I have opposed recall elections except for cases of criminal activity, gross incompetence or something pretty outragous.

Gray Davis was none of that, but he got recalled and we got an action hero Governor who knows how to read polls and nothing else.

I think Jeff Denham is horrible, but not criminal or outragous. There is far more reason to recall him than there was Gray Davis.

My only problem with the recall is that beating a recall gives a politician strength that he/she would not normally have.

Feinstein was an average politician until she beat a recall and then she became unstoppable.  I trust this won't happen with Denham, but I am a little concerned.  Now that we have the recall we need to follow through and remove him from office.


Denham is termed out in 2010 (0.00 / 0)
It's a district we can win when there's an open seat. But because of the need for 2/3 this year, with this budget, it's worth a shot now with the recall.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave

[ Parent ]
History by Jeff Denham | 4 comments
Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Blog Network:

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Powered by: SoapBlox