[mobile site, backup mobile]
[Calitics en espanol]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
October 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services

ProgressiveCA Blogs

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Parties for "Party A" and "Party B"

by: Julia Rosen

Thu May 29, 2008 at 12:02:14 PM PDT


The California wedding industry is about to see a major influx of dollars.  Starting June 17, "Party A" and "Party B" will fill out the new forms from the state Office of Vital Records.  This is of course leads to another party, a wedding reception.  Companies are already starting to gear up their advertising, hoping to get a healthy share of all of that cash.  Macy's put a huge ad in the LAT.  WashBlade has the image:

The Los Angeles Times ran a Macy's ad today showing two mingling wedding rings with the following message: "First comes love. Then comes marriage. And now it's a milestone every couple in California can celebrate."

I imagine the wingnuts are firing up their boycott machine.

Thanks to the new governor in New York, we are likely to see a decent amount of wedding tourism.  NYT:

Gov. David A. Paterson has directed all state agencies to begin to revise their policies and regulations to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions, like Massachusetts, California and Canada.

In a directive issued on May 14, the governor's legal counsel, David Nocenti, instructed the agencies that gay couples married elsewhere "should be afforded the same recognition as any other legally performed union."

The directive was issued prior to the court ruling and it is interesting that it took so long for this to be made public.  Nevertheless, this does mean that many a gay New Yorker will make a trip to California to fill out their Party A and Party B forms and then return home to get the 1,300 rights that the Republican controlled NY State Senate refuses to give them.  Sure they could drive over to Massachusetts, but I have to say there are many prettier places to get married out here than in MA.  No offense to the Bay Staters.

Julia Rosen :: Parties for "Party A" and "Party B"
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Awesome (0.00 / 0)
Props to NY and David Paterson on this. Hopefully it will lead NY State to allow equal marriages to be performed there - especially as CA gets a huge wave of wedding tourism.

And I wasn't intending to register at Macy's for our wedding this July (REI is where I really want my family to go) but my fiancee said we should anyway, and I'm glad we did - that's an excellent ad.  

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


i think macy's is the bon marche up in WA (0.00 / 0)
but REI is a great idea. especially at the huge seattle store.

surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat

[ Parent ]
Heh, not any more (0.00 / 0)
Macy's rebranded all their regional stores like the Bon as Macy's - angering lots of folks who liked the older, traditional names.

REI opened an outlet in Marina last year, but it's about 1/4 the size of the Seattle flagship store, which I'd grown so used to. That place is awesome.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Just among my friends (0.00 / 0)
there are something like 3 gay couples getting married in the next 3 months.  It's awesome.

Mass (0.00 / 0)
Actually, Massachusetts has a law that says that they won't grant licenses to out-of-state couples where their home state wouldn't recognize the marriage. Or some such hooey.  I know under Romney, they vigorously enforced that law. I'm not sure how it's working under Patrick.

But either way, as you mentioned, California has some beautiful locations for weddings!

Shouldn't 3 strikes apply to Arnold? Strike 1, Strike 2, Strike 3. Life Sentence!


Right (0.00 / 0)
but now the state is saying they will accept it, so they can go to MA and get married.

[ Parent ]
Do you have information on that? (0.00 / 0)
As far as I knew, the law is still valid in Massachusetts where there is a residency requirement for marriage, whereby if you are not a resident of MA, the laws of your resident state apply, which in NY do not allow for marriage equality.

I'd love to hear that the "state is saying they will accept it" - I'd just like to read where that's been stated from the state of Massachusetts.

KELL


[ Parent ]
I am not totally sure (0.00 / 0)
though the folks over at Blue Mass Group are celebrating it and already saying that they will be losing the tourist dollars to CA.

[ Parent ]
Brian L is going to be "Party B" (0.00 / 0)
I am so going to be "Party A"!

Now that that's settled . . .  


Damn (0.00 / 0)
that just adds one more things for couples to argue over when it comes to weddings.

:)


[ Parent ]
Oh Snap! (0.00 / 0)
We'll just see about that. I'm pretty quick with my cat-like reflexes. I'm betting that I'll nab the form first!

Shouldn't 3 strikes apply to Arnold? Strike 1, Strike 2, Strike 3. Life Sentence!

[ Parent ]
Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Blog Network:

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Powered by: SoapBlox