[mobile site, backup mobile]
[Calitics en espanol]
Menu & About Calitics

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

- About Calitics
- The Rules (Legal Stuff)
- Event Calendar
- Calitics' ActBlue Page
- Calitics RSS Feed
- Additional Advertisers
Daily Email Summary


View All Calitics Tags Or Search with Google:
 
Web Calitics
The Calitics Show:
Event Calendar
October 2008
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* * * 01 02 03 04
05 06 07 08 09 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 *
<< (add event) >>

Wire Services

ProgressiveCA Blogs

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Listen to Calitics Podcast on internet talk radioAdvertise Liberally Blue CA Ad Network

Ideas Hatched In A Bar Are The Best Ideas

by: David Dayen

Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 13:39:23 PM PDT


I guess this was in the Huffington Post a couple months ago, but I had missed it.  Today the New York Times brings the news about a group of satirists in San Francisco with an inspired idea and a dream:

From the Department of Damned-With-Faint-Praise, a group going by the regal-sounding name of the Presidential Memorial Commission of San Francisco is planning to ask voters here to change the name of a prize-winning water treatment plant on the shoreline to the George W. Bush Sewage Plant.

The plan, naturally hatched in a bar, would place a vote on the November ballot to provide "an appropriate honor for a truly unique president."

Supporters say that they have plenty of signatures to qualify the initiative and that the renaming would fit in a long and proud American tradition of poking political figures in the eye.

There's really no more fitting honor for America's worst President.  I would fund this initiative.

David Dayen :: Ideas Hatched In A Bar Are The Best Ideas
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I actually think this is unfair (8.00 / 1)
Sewage treatment plants are essential parts of a city's infrastructure, and serve a useful purpose, making dirty water clean.  And this plant is a particularly good exemplar of the class of facility.

By contrast, George Bush serves almost no useful purpose, except as the national Goofus object lesson.


Something to consider (0.00 / 0)
A sewage plant that doesn't work is not a good thing at all. If the plant in question ends up anything like its proposed namesake, the citizens of SF would be in deep doodoo before too long.

I might suggest an oil tanker being named after him, but when it ran agroud and spilled all of its contents into our oceans, well that wouldn't be good either.


As I've told the signature gatherers ... (0.00 / 0)
I vehemently oppose this Proposition, because it is horribly unfair to sewage treatment plants.  Even naming a garbage dump after George Bush would be unfair to garbage dumps.

I have a better idea: on January 20, 2009, the City and County of San Francisco should re-name Bush Street ... to Obama Street.  I've written about this idea: http://www.beyondchron.org/new...


Puppet Street (0.00 / 0)
Were you there on the morning of January 20, 2001, when all the "Bush Street" signs had been renamed "Puppet Street"? It was great.

I always thought Bush Street should be renamed, and Obama Street would be an excellent choice.

You can check out any time you like but you can never leave


[ Parent ]
Right now, I'd prefer (8.00 / 1)
Feingold Street.

[ Parent ]
For San Francisco, I'd say Harvey Milk Street (0.00 / 0)
Personally, I'd actually rather just keep the name as it is. Changing a street name like Bush would be costly for the City and the business owners along the street. But, if we did change it, I'd go with Harvey Milk St. I think it's more appropriate for the City.

Shouldn't 3 strikes apply to Arnold? Strike 1, Strike 2, Strike 3. Life Sentence!

[ Parent ]
the oceanside plant is too good to be named after GWBush (0.00 / 0)
i like bars and many of the ideas hatched in them. still, a mark of good satire is that it actually underlying fallacies of our political culture.  this thing doesn't get out of the mentality of laughing about shit.  

the plant in question is an EPA award winning plant completed in the 80's.  I've been working on reforming and rebuilding SF's wastewater infrastructure for a decade now and frankly this place is too good to be named after W.

the last thing we ought to be doing is naming anything that keeps our water clean after the man who has done more to undo environmental regulations than anyone in recent memory.  i mean, this guy actually vetoed a clean water infrastructure bill this past year.

this thing looks like its going to get on the ballot.  don't degrade the name of the plant and vote against it.


Calitics Premium Ads

Advertisers

California Friends
Shared Communities
Resources
California News
Progressive Organizations
The Big BlogRoll

Referrals
Technorati
Google Blogsearch
Blog Network:

Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Powered by: SoapBlox