Carlton Pearson: The closest to God you’ll probably ever get
The Carlton Pearson curiosity continues.
Over the last few weeks I’ve noticed the amount of search engine queries landing on this site have shot heavenward for Carlton Pearson. The searchers have typed:
- carlton pearson goes bad
- carlton pearson has cancer
- carlton pearson has lost his mind
- is carlton pearson gay?
- did carlton pearson get a divorce?
As far as I can tell, Carlton Pearson’s “badness” quotient has gotten no worse than when I wrote my semi-definitive exploration of his doctrine of inclusion back in early 2006: “Carlton D. Pearson: The Charismatic Bishop of Heresy.” I’ve read that around 2005 Pearson had been diagnosed with prostate cancer but, according to last night’s 20/20 program (read the segment: ‘Nobody Goes to Hell’: Minister Labeled a Heretic), it is now in remission. Pearson appears to enjoy full possession of his faculties, as far as the TV demonstrates (though he did once hear revelatory voices from God), he has not publicly admitted to any homosexual inclinations that I know of (or can find), and nobody anywhere has reported a divorce.
But Pearson did publish a book recently, and I figure that caused some of the alarm. God Is Not a Christian defends his views, answers his critics, and, according to the sole reviewer “he also throws in a lot of ideas about God, the divinity of man, and why he views Scripture as flawed in places. This will bother some of his conservative Christian readers.”
Indeed.
If there are any.
Pearson’s book currently ranks #829,524 on Amazon.com (as of Saturday, July 14, 2007). It’s no Mere Christianity-style instant classic to be sure (which ranks at #405), and Wayne Grudem’s Systematic Theology (ranked at #1,432) must have a marketing genius pushing the tome when compared to Pearson’s sales rate.
But the media love Pearson and I’m sure his sales will pick up well before Hell freezes over. Not that Pearson wants to profit off of Hell. No, he’s done getting paid for Heck-Fire:
“If I say everybody’s going to heaven, then I can’t raise money from you to get me to keep people out of hell.” (20/20, “‘Nobody Goes to Hell’: Minister Labeled a Heretic“)
Problem is, once you’ve done away with Hell, why stop there? Since, in Pearson’s view, the doctrine of Hell rests on man-made documents about a man-made myth, then the doctrine of Heaven itself is on shaky grounds.
The flipside of Pearson’s hell-doubting theology, however, is that he sounds awfully skeptical about the existence of heaven. “We don’t know what happens after this life,” he says. “But we presume something good happens. So we’ve come up with these thrones and gates and virgins … But the closest to God you’ll probably ever get is you.” (Reuters, “Checking in with Carlton Pearson - who doesn’t believe in hell - in Tulsa“)
Not a quote I’d want to enter Eternity with, for sure.
I watched Bill Weir’s 20/20 documentary on Hell last night, but after Tivoing the program, I must have run out of disk space. I only captured 33 minutes of the program. Sadly, the show cut off before the commercial break leading into Pearson’s segment. Otherwise, I would have shown you a clip. But if you hurry, you might be able to catch it streaming off of the ABC.com website.
![]()
(Pearson photo by Scott Griessel via Flickr.)
Suspiciously Similar Posts
The machine does this. Your mileage may vary
- Del.icio.us links for August 26, 2006 (0 comments)
- Cheap Grace: Pimp my gospel! (10 comments)
- Do Heaven and Hell exist? (1 comments)
- Carlton D. Pearson: The Charismatic Bishop of Heresy (129 comments)
- Fatal Sincerity: Our complicit silence when heresy speaks (23 comments)
- Heaven and Hell: September 21, 2005, class #2 (0 comments)
- Heaven & Hell: Open House (0 comments)





Posted: Saturday, July 14, 2007 @ 11:58 am
Hmmm… looks like there’s more than one version of his book on Amazon. This one ( http://www.amazon.com/dp/0979168902 ) is ranked #6,960. Still not a top seller by any means, but selling more respectably (unfortunately) than the version you had referenced.
Clay.
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2007 @ 6:57 am
Rich, Is this blatant linkbait?
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2007 @ 11:59 am
@Clay,
Thanks, good catch, Clay!
@Carl,
Dude, everything I do on BlogRodent is link-bait. According to that all-knowing source of information on pop-culture, here are some typical forms of link-bait:
Seriously, I try to add something of interest and value to everything I post here. If it generates enough interest for folks to link to the post, I’m happy for them.
As for my motivation to write this particular post: it’s news. People are searching for the latest on Carlton Pearson, I help by providing at least a few answers.
I use my powers for good, not evil.
Rich
BlogRodent
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2007 @ 1:02 pm
I was only (partially) kidding. Its your blog. Post on!
But seriously, i think it is only a matter of time before the news on Pearson is more on a personal rather than doctrinal note. Everything points in that direction, but at this point, who would care?
If you create a religion where you can do no wrong, there is no one to judge your actions when you publicly fall.
Posted: Monday, July 16, 2007 @ 2:47 pm
For once I agree with Carl :: Rolls eyes:: but not for the reason he thinks. A few months back I called Pearson a heretic for his “All Are Saved” point of belief and dismissing Hell, I’m sticking with that. If I remember the debate right the last time, the only ones sticking up for Mr. Pearson where heterosexual Christians.
Posted: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 @ 7:29 pm
Rich, I do not know if it is available streaming via ABC’s website, but it did come through on 20/20’s video podcast, along with other episodes in their series on hell.
Posted: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 @ 10:55 am
The Bishop had some interesting things to say after the whole Larry Craig debacle - he sent in a written piece to Orato, the first person citizen journalism website shortly after the whole thing went public. I’ll leave the link to the original story (The Shame And Sham Of Senator Larry E. Craig, and a reaction piece that followed (All Hell Breaks Loose And A “Heretic” Stands His Ground).
Hope someone finds them interesting …
Robyn
Posted: Sunday, September 23, 2007 @ 3:42 pm
Interesting read Robyn. I’m just sorry it took Pearson falling into heresy for him to see gays as God’s creations too.
Posted: Monday, September 24, 2007 @ 11:58 pm
Hmm… C Pearson heresy. I was intrigued by the definition and its exclusionary thrust. It is either denial of years of conventional wisdom or just a position that does not sufficiently meet current standards. Once there were religious beliefs and doctrinal ideas that kept society in check. These beliefs existed for centuries prior to a certain birth. Then, seemingly a single man taught a view of life, faith and redemption that can only be described as heresy- an idea in conflict with conventionally, long established beliefs. This man was ostracized by his own, cast out by friends and associates, denied by religious peers and eventually punished by community leaders. Is Carlton Pearson on par with Jesus, no, not to the best of my knowledge but his torturers are very much similar to those persecutors from thousands of years ago.
How is it that one religious strand that found its beginnings in a teaching not meant for it come to dominate the thinking of a vast majority of people from around the world? It was itself a heresy by its own definition. A little religious tolerance rather than fear and ruination might go a long way in allowing all of Gods children to have enough faith to enter the pearly gates.
A core problem with Carlton Pearson’s excommunication is that Jesus died for of our sins and we are therefore cleansed at birth. To imply that thousands of years later, Jesus died for some sins, only those commited by those of certain faiths seems problematic. GOD created man, all men, all animals, all things of earth that we use use to create continual life. He did not allow another to create the bad. Mankind creates the bad through its actions not through some travel to and commitment to hell. GOD could only create things that are good and therefore could not create bad, evil, deestructive behavior. Biologically, man was created with the capacity to do both good and bad. And without the ability to fully understand why we can kill, covet and destroy; the creation of Hell and satan was required from a human point of view. Again GOD is absolute and perfect and did not create the imperfect. Man’s limited understanding of its abilties, good and bad, had to create the type of world where we spiritually confine the evils of life- Hell.
The Basic Instruction Before Leaving Earth-
Oh, by the way, those who want to ruin anyone with contrarian view may want to do some reading. Is there there a possibilty that the Bible was a compilation from the Council of Nicea?
Because we want, no, need to, understand our world, having views that may challenge conventional wisdom is not in and of itself bad. Punishing a man who goes from preacher to teacher is only following in steps of another man called a “rabbi” (teacher). Are we ready to continue the persecutions?
Posted: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 @ 12:20 am
Cincinnati,
Please know when I use the term “Heresy” it is not said lightly, on the contrary, it is said with fear and trepidation, knowing consequences, if I am wrong.
Jesus was not seen creating something “new” that was labeled a heresy, He came to extend what was already known to “the Jew first.” He fulfilled, with his life and death, the “law” that was pre-given to his chosen people with the end result (Salvation) benefiting Gentiles also. The Man, who’s birth of which you speak, got into trouble because being the Son of God, He exposed man-made hypocrisies contrary to His Father’s will, not because He taught something radical from His own volition. How you see Pearson in this equation is beyond me.
One of the loveliest attributes of the very Maker of the heavens and earth is His patience, willingness, to wait for our love in respect to our free will, loving us enough to let us choose him if we will. You on the other hand you see that as exactly with what’s wrong with Salvation I believe in.
I don’t believe in your premise of “good people” because our root core is evil as fallen beings. I believe we did not invent Hell because man is much too proud, too arrogant, to make something he cannot be reprieved from. Mankind has made enough Hell here for himself to take it any further. Jesus spoke more on hell than He did heaven and I have nothing to add.
P.S. If your going to try to use that “The Council of Nicea changed the Bible” line, your knowledge of history is on par with laughable religious conspiracy’s long debunked.
Skip ahead to the comment form …