Lane's Blog

An Announcment About the Videos I Post...

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:01:00 +0000

END OF POST

An Introduction to Reformed Theology(James White)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:26:00 +0000

This sermon along with several others in this series and writings from Spurgeon are what first introduced me to the doctrines of grace (also known as Reformed Theology or Calvinism). Here and in others in the series I may post soon, James White discusses what exactly Reformed Theology is and dispels many of the rumors that are made by opponents to the Reformed faith (or Calvinism). I highly recommend listening to this regardless if you believe you don't need to learn more about the doctrines of grace or if you want to learn more about them.

END OF POST

The Ten Commandments(Thomas Watson)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:54:00 +0000

Here is Thomas Watson's classic work "The Ten Commandments." You can download this file as a pdf by going to the link where this is hosted found at the bottom of the document then following the instructions on the iPaper feeder.

Watson, Thomas - The Ten Commandments - Upload a Document to Scribd

Sovereign Grace and Man's Responsibility(C.H. Spurgeon)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:45:00 +0000

Again, the grace of God is sovereign. By that word we mean that God has an absolute right to give that grace where he chooses, and to withhold it when he pleases. He is not bound to give it to any man, much less to all men; and if he chooses to give it to one man and not to another, his answer is, "Is thine eye evil because mine eye is good? Can I not do as I will with mine own? I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy." Now, I want you to notice the sovereignty of Divine grace as illustrated in the text: "I was found of them that sought me not, I was made manifest to them that asked not after thee." You would imagine that if God gave his grace to any he would wait until he found them earnestly seeking him. You would imagine that God in the highest heavens would say, "I have mercies, but I will leave men alone, and when they feel their need of these mercies and seek me diligently with their whole heart, day and night, with tears, and vows, and supplications, then will I bless them, but not before." But, beloved, God saith no such thing. It is true he doth bless them that cry unto him, but he blesses them before they cry, for their cries are not their own cries, but cries which he has put into their lips; their desires are not of their own growth, but desires which he has cast like good seed into the soil of their hearts. God saves the men that do not seek him. Oh, wonder of wonders! It is mercy indeed when God saves a seeker; but how much greater mercy when he seeks the lost himself! Mark the parable of Jesus Christ concerning the lost sheep; it does not run thus: "A certain man had a hundred sheep, and one of them did go astray. And he tarried at home, and lo, the sheep came back, and he received it joyfully and said to his friends, rejoice, for the sheep that I have lost is come back." No; he went after the sheep: it never would have come after him; it would have wandered farther and farther away. He went after it; over hills of difficulty, down valleys of despondency he pursued its wandering feet, and at last he laid hold of it; he did not drive it before him, he did not lead it, but he carried it himself all the way, and when he brought it home he did not say, the sheep is come back," but, "I have found the sheep which was lost." Men do not seek God first; God seeks them first; and if any of you are seeking him to-day it is because he has first sought you. If you are desiring him he desired you first, and your good desires and earnest seeking will not be the cause of your salvation, but the effects of previous grace given to you. "Well," says another, "I should have thought that although the Saviour might not require an earnest seeking and sighing and groaning, and a continuous searching, after him, yet certainly he would have desired and demanded that every man, before he had grace, should ask for it." That, indeed, beloved, seems natural, and God will give grace to them that ask for it; but mark, the text says that he was manifested "to them that asked not for him." That is to say, before we ask, God gives us grace. The only reason why any man ever begins to pray is because God has put previous grace in his heart which leads him to pray. I remember, when I was converted to God, I was an Arminian thoroughly. I thought I had begun the good work myself, and I used sometimes to sit down and think, "Well, I sought the Lord four years before I found him," and I think I began to compliment myself upon the fact that I had perseveringly entreated of him in the midst of much discouragement. But one day the thought struck me, "How was it you came to seek God?" and in an instant the answer came from my soul, "Why, because he led me to do it; he must first have shown me my need of him, or else I should never have sought him; he must have shown me his preciousness, or I never should have thought him worth seeking;" and at once I saw the doctrines of grace as clear as possible. God must begin. Nature can never rise above itself. You put water into a reservoir, and it will rise as high as that, but no higher if let alone. Now, it is not in human nature to seek the Lord. Human nature is depraved, and therefore, there must be the extraordinary pressure of the Holy Spirit put upon the heart to lead us first to ask for mercy. But mark, we do not know an thing about that, while the Spirit is operating; we find that out afterwards. We ask as much as if we were asking all of ourselves. Our business is to seek the Lord as if there were no Holy Spirit at all. But although we do not know it, there must always be a previous motion of the Spirit in our heart, before there will be a motion of our heart towards him.

END OF POST

Are You Sure that You Like Spurgeon...?

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:56:00 +0000

ARE YOU SURE YOU LIKE SPURGEON?

"The doctrine of justification itself, as preached by an Arminian, is nothing but the doctrine of salvation by works..." -- C.H. Spurgeon

Praised by many evangelicals as a great preacher, Charles H. Spurgeon is considered a successful and "safe" example of a "non-theological" ministry. His works are recommended as a means to lead many aspiring pastors into developing their own successful ministries. His Lectures to My Students are often used for this purpose, emphasizing the "practical" aspects of evangelism. But while the form of Spurgeon's successful preaching is often studied by would-be pastors, the content of this Christian giant's preaching and teaching is often ignored. Rather Spurgeon is popularly thought to have heartily approved of the same theology that is presently dominating American culture: Arminianism.

Many Christian leaders, for instance, like to point out Spurgeon as one who also had no formal college training. They ignore the fact that he had a personal library containing more that 10,000 books.1 It is further argued that the success of his ministry in the mid-to-late 19th century was due to his anti-intellectual piety, "his yieldedness to the Spirit," and his Arminianism. The fact is, Spurgeon was not anti-intellectual, nor did he entertain delusions of being so holy that he could allow God to work only if he was "yielded." Most importantly, he was not an Arminian. He was a staunch Calvinist who opposed the dominant religious view of his day (and of ours), Arminianism.2 Even toward the end of his life he could write, "From this doctrine I have not departed to this day." 3 He was grateful that he never wavered from his Calvinism.4 "There is no soul living who holds more firmly to the doctrine of grace than do I..."5 Reading Spurgeon's beliefs, one will see that this tremendously fruitful ministry was built upon the preaching of the biblical gospel.

In his work, "A Defence of Calvinism," he states unequivocally: [T]here is no such thing as preaching Christ and Him crucified, unless we preach what nowadays is called Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the gospel, and nothing else. I do not believe we can preach the gospel, if we do not preach justification by faith, without works; nor unless we preach the sovereignty of God in His dispensation of grace; nor unless we exalt the electing, unchangeable, eternal, immutable, conquering love of Jehovah; nor do I think we can preach the gospel, unless we base it upon the special and particular redemption of His elect and chosen people which Christ wrought out upon the cross; nor can I comprehend a gospel which lets saints fall away after they are called, and suffers the children of God to be burned in the fires of damnation

Here Spurgeon affirms his agreement with what are usually called "The Five Points of Calvinism." Spurgeon's own summation was much shorter: A Calvinist believes that salvation is of the Lord.7 Selections from his sermons and writings on these subjects make his position clear.

Regarding Total Depravity and Irresistible Grace:
When you say, "Can God make me become a Christian?" I tell you yes, for herein rests the power of the gospel. It does not ask your consent; but it gets it. It does not say, "Will you have it?" but it makes you willing in the day of God's power....The gospel wants not your consent, it gets it. It knocks the enmity out of your heart. You say, I do not want to be saved; Christ says you shall be. He makes our will turn round, and then you cry,"'Lord save, or I perish!"8

Regarding Unconditional Election:
I do not hesitate to say, that next to the doctrine of the crucifixion and the resurrection of our blessed Lord--no doctrine had such prominence in the early Christian Church as the doctrine of the election of grace.9 And when confronted with the discomfort this doctrine would bring, he responded with little sympathy: "'I do not like it [divine election],' saith one. Well, I thought you would not; whoever dreamed you would?"10

Regarding Particular Atonement:
[I]f it was Christ's intention to save all men, how deplorably has he been disappointed, for we have His own testimony that there is a lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, and into that pit of woe have been cast some of the very persons who, according to the theory of universal redemption, were bought with His blood.11 (cont...)

He has punished Christ, why should He punish twice for one offence? Christ has died for all His people's sins, and if thou art in the covenant, thou art one of Christ's people. Damned thou canst not be. Suffer for thy sins thou canst not. Until God can be unjust, and demand two payments for one debt, He cannot destroy the soul for whom Jesus died.12

Regarding the Perseverance of the Saints:
I do not know how some people, who believe that a Christian can fall from grace, manage to be happy. It must be a very commendable thing in them to be able to get through a day without despair. If I did not believe in the doctrine of the final perseverance of the saints, I think I should be of all men most miserable, because I should lack any ground of comfort.13 The selections above indicate that C. H. Spurgeon was without a doubt an affirmed, self-professing Calvinist who made his ministry's success dependent upon truth, unwilling to consider the "Five Points of Calvinism" as separate, sterile categories to be memorized and believed in isolation from each other or Scripture. He often blended the truths represented by the Five Points, because they actually are mutually supportive parts of a whole, and not five little sections of faith added to one's collection of Christian beliefs. Spurgeon never presented them as independent oddities to be believed as the sum of Christianity. Rather, he preached a positive gospel, ever mindful that these beliefs were only part of the whole counsel of God and not the sum total. These points were helpful, defensive summaries, but they did not take the place of the vast theater of redemption within which God's complete and eternal plan was worked out in the Old and New Testaments.

Certain that the Cross was an offense and stumbling block, Spurgeon was unwilling to make the gospel more acceptable to the lost. "The old truth that Calvin preached, that Augustine preached, is the truth that I must preach today, or else be false to my conscience and to God. I cannot shape the truth; I know of no such thing as paring off the rough edges of a doctrine."14 Elsewhere he challenged "I cannot find in Scripture any other doctrine than this. It is the essence of the Bible....Tell me anything contrary to this truth, and it will be heresy..."15 Spurgeon believed that the price of ridicule and rejection was not counted so high that he should refuse to preach this gospel: "[W]e are reckoned the scum of creation; scarcely a minister looks on us or speaks favorable of us, because we hold strong vies upon the divine sovereignty of God, and his divine electings and special love towards His own people."16

Then, as now, the dominant objection to such preaching was that it would lead to licentious living. Since Christ "did it all," there was no need for them to obey the commands of Scripture. Aside from the fact that we should not let sinful people decide what kind of gospel we will preach, Spurgeon had his own rebuttals to this confusion:

[I]t is often said that the doctrines we believe have a tendency to lead us to sin....I ask the man who dares to say that Calvinism is a licentious religion, what he thinks of the character of Augustine, or Calvin, or Whitefield, who in successive ages were the great exponents of the systems of grace; or what will he say of the Puritans, whose works are full of them? Had a man been an Arminian in those days, he would have been accounted the vilest heretic breathing, but now we are looked upon as the heretics, and they as orthodox. We have gone back to the old school; we can trace our descent from the apostles....We can run a golden line up to Jesus Christ Himself, through a holy succession of mighty fathers, who all held these glorious truths; and we can ask concerning them, "Where will you find holier and better men in the world?"17

His attitude toward those who would distort the gospel for their own ideas of "holiness" is clear from the following: No doctrine is so calculated to preserve a man from sin as the doctrine of the grace of God. Those who have called it 'a licentious doctrine' did not know anything at all about it. Poor ignorant things, they little knew that their own vile stuff was the most licentious doctrine under Heaven.18

According to Spurgeon (and Scripture as well), the response of gratitude is the motive for holy living, not the uncertain status of the believer under the influence of Arminianism and its accompanying legalism. "The tendency of Arminianism is towards legality; it is nothing but legality which lays at the root of Arminianism."19 He was very clear on the dangerous relationship of Arminianism to legalism: "Do you not see at once that this is legality--that this is hanging our salvation upon our work--that this is making our eternal life to depend upon something we do? Nay, the doctrine of justification itself, as preached by an Arminianism, is nothing but the doctrine of salvation by works...."20

A status before God based upon how we "use" Christ and the Spirit to feign righteousness was a legalism hated by Spurgeon. As in our day, Spurgeon saw that one of the strongholds of Arminianism included the independent churches.21 Arminianism was a natural, God-rejecting, self-exalting religion and heresy.22 As Spurgeon believed, we are born Arminians by nature.23 He saw this natural aversion to God as encouraged by believing self-centered, self-exalting fancies. "If you believe that everything turns upon the free-will of man, you will naturally have man as its principal figure in your landscape."24 And again he affirms the remedy for this confusion to be true doctrine. "I believe that very much of current Arminianism is simply ignorance of gospel doctrine."25 Further, "I do not serve the god of the Arminians at all; I have nothing to do with him, and I do not bow down before the Baal they have set up; he is not my God, nor shall he ever be; I fear him not, nor tremble at his presence...The God that saith today and denieth tomorrow, that justifieth today and condemns the next...is no relation to my God in the least degree. He may be a relation of Ashtaroth or Baal, but Jehovah never was or can be his name."26 Refusing to compromise the gospel in any way, he soundly refuted and rejected common attempts to unite Calvinism and Arminianism into a synthesized belief. Nor would he downplay the importance of the differences between the two systems:

This may seem to you to be of little consequence, but it really is a matter of life and death. I would plead with every Christian--think it over, my dear brother. When some of us preach Calvinism, and some Arminianism, we cannot both be right; it is of not use trying to think we can be--'Yes,' and 'no,' cannot both be true.Truth does not vacillate like the pendulum which shakes backwards and forwards....One must be right; the other wrong.27

Alan Maben

Notes

1. Walter A. Elwell, ed. Evangelical Dictonary of Theology (Grand Rapids,
Michigan: Baker Book House, 1984), s.v. "Spurgeon, Charles Haddon," by J. E. Johnson. 2. From sermon cited in Iain Murray, The Forgotten Spurgeon, 2d ed., (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1986), 52. 3. "A Defense of Calvinism," by C. H. Spurgeon, in C. H. Spurgeon Autobiography, eds. S. Spurgeon and J. Harrold, Rev ed., vol I, The Early Years 1834-1859 (Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1976: reprint), 165. 4. J. E. Johnson, 1051 5. Spurgeon, "A Defense of Calvinism," 173. 6. Ibid. 168. 7. Ibid., 168. 8. As cited in Murray, 93. 9. From a sermon cited in Murray, Ibid., 44. 10. Ibid., 60. 11. Spurgeon, 172. 12. From a sermon cited in Murray, 245. 13. Spurgeon, 169. 14. Ibid., 162. 15. Ibid., 168. 16. Murray, 168. 17. Spurgeon, 174. 18. Ibid. 19. Murray, 79. 20. Ibid., 81. 21. Murray, 53. 22. spurgeon, 168. 23. Ibid., 164. 24. Murray, 111. 25. Ibid., 68. 26. Spurgeon's Sermons, vol. 6 (Baker, 1989), p.241 27. Murray, op. cit., 57.

Recommended Works:

Murray, Iain. The Forgotten Spurgeon, 2d ed. Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust, 1986; reprint. Spurgeon, Charles H. "A Defence of Calvinism" in C. H. Spurgeon Autobiography. Edited by S. Spurgeon and J. Harrald. Rev. ed. Vol I, The Early Years 1834-1859. Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth Trust, 1976; reprint. Spurgeon, Charles H. New Park Street Pulpit. A collection of his sermons. Spurgeon, Charles H. Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit. A collection of his sermons.

END OF POST

The Utter Depravity of Man

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 14:28:00 +0000

I saw the following clip last night and couldn't help but be enamored with how depraved the human race actually is. People who love their sin become so wicked and complacent that they do things like... watch people die right in front of them without even the first inclination of helping them.

(WARNING: This video is disturbing.)

Does the following video make more sense now?

END OF POST

Since Some Have Asked...

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Tue, 01 Jul 2008 04:44:00 +0000

Since I announced that I got into law school and was selling books on eBay to help with the costs, I've been humbled that people have contacted me about wanting to help with the financial aspect of it. I was hesitant to post this at first, but I realized that this may be the easiest way for those who've been wanting to help with that do so. Please don't feel obligated to help financially because that's not the intention of this post, but if you do, be assured that it is much appreciated and will definitely help with the transition and other expenses. If you'd like to help, but would prefer not to use Paypal, just email me. Thanks again to those who've inquired. I continue to be honored and humbled that people would even consider wanting to do this. If you don't believe God would have you give for this but would rather use those funds in a different area of the Kingdom, please still give prayer for my faith as I partake upon this endeavor for we know that our faith in Christ is far more valuable than the gold which perishes. (1Pet 1:6-7)

Thanks,
Lane

Lane's Law School Fund

END OF POST

The Return of Issues, Etc.

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:54:00 +0000

I just received this email and thought many of you would like to be informed of this if you aren't already:

Dear Friend of Issues, Etc.,

We’re excited about the return of Issues, Etc.! Since the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod canceled the show on March 18, we’ve been working on the show’s return. We’re very happy to announce that Issues, Etc. will be back on the Radio and Internet starting Monday, June 30!

The show will broadcast LIVE from 3-5 p.m. CST weekdays at our website, www.issuesetc.org. Issues, Etc. will also air LIVE from 4-5 p.m. CST on KSIV, 1320 AM in St. Louis. Of course, both hours will be available for on-demand downloads.

As always, Issues, Etc. is listener supported. Lutheran Public Radio is the producer of Issues, Etc. Please consider making a special startup gift to Lutheran Public Radio. You can make a secure online donation at our website or you can also donate by check to:

Lutheran Public Radio
P.O. Box 1046
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92693

If you have any questions, email me or call me at (618) 223-8385.

Thanks for your support!

Wir sind alle Bettler,

Todd Wilken, Host
Issues, Etc.

END OF POST

Augustus Toplady on Arminianism and "Free"-Will

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:00:00 +0000

Augustus Montague Toplady was a preacher who lived from 1740-1778. He wrote numerous hymns including the famous "Rock of Ages" sung here by Chris Rice who I don't know much about so I don't endorse his theology per say:

A while back, I got Toplady's complete works and have been reading them since. His views on Arminianism and "free"-will may be shocking to some, but keep in mind that this is a preacher from just a little over 200 years ago. He understood the problems and self-contradictions these two doctrines demand and commented on them in sometimes a humorous and sometimes direct manner, but he always was explicit about where he stood in regards to these issues which is something that is lacking among many today. Here are several quotes from his complete works:

Arminianism

"I much question whether the man that dies an Arminian can go to heaven. But certainly he will not be an Arminian when he is in heaven. The employ of the blessed is to cast their crowns at the feet of God and the Lamb, and to sing, "Not unto us O Lord."

Should it be thought harsh to question the salvation of one who dies under the blindness of Arminianism; as if a man who only robs God in part might miss of glory; let it be considered that, even on earth, if a person robs me only of my watch, or of a single guinea, he has forfeited his life to the law, as much as if he had robbed me of all I am worth."

"The old Arminians mentioned in Scripture are blamed for thinking wickedly that God was such an one as themselves; but our new Arminians out-sin their predecessors, and actually represent God as a being in many respects considerably inferior to themselves. They suppose him both to form schemes with less wisdom, and to execute them with less power, spirit, and success, than a prime minister of common sense forms and executes his. They dare ascribe to God such impotence, blunders, imperfections, and disappointments, as they would blush to ascribe to a Ximenes, or a Sully."

"Arminians consider the grace that is inspired into a true believer's heart, as a text of Scripture written upon a pane of glass, liable to be demolished by the first hand that flings a stone at it."

"All the disputes between us and the Arminians may be reduced to these two questions:
1. Is God dependent on man, or is man dependent on God?
2. Is man a debtor to God, or God a debtor to man?"

"The Arminians think, that in conversion God does little or nothing for men, but gives them a pull by the elbow, to awake them from their sleep. Rather, he acts as maritime officers do by their sailors; he cuts down the hammock of carnal security in which the elect are; down they fall, and the bruises and surprise they receive awaken them from their death in sin, and bring them to themselves whether they will or no."

"According to Arminianism, grace has the name, but 'free'-will the game."

"Arminians suppose God to give us heaven, as the king grants a brief for building a church. The brief runs, "We have granted our most gracious letters patent." But these same most gracious letters are amply paid for before they are granted. No fee, no brief."

"Arminians will ask, "Where's the use of preaching the doctrines of grace, even supposing them to be true? Since we may go to heaven without a clear knowledge of them." And a man may go to heaven with broken bones; yet it is better to go thither in a whole skin. A man may get to his journey's end, though it rain and thunder all the way; yet it is more comfortable to travel in fair weather. You or I might make a better shift to live upon a scanty allowance of bread and water; yet, surely, an easy fortune, and a decent table are, in themselves, abundantly preferable to poverty and short commons. Who would wish to go upon thorns when his way may be strewed with roses?"

"I can compare some ranting Arminian preachers, who represent salvation as a matter of chance, and press men to help forward their own conversion, upon pain of damnation, to none so well as to auctioneers; who, with the hammer in their hands, are always bawling out, "Now is your time; now is your time: a-going, a-going, a-going."

Such a method is equally inconsistent with the analogy of faith, and subversive of the majesty of the gospel. Shall I order a dead soul to awake, and raise itself to life? Let me rather address the living God, and say, "Awake, and put on thy strength, O arm of the Lord! Breathe on these slain that they may live!" "

"Free"-Will

"A man's 'free'-will cannot cure him even of the tooth-ache, or of a sore finger; and yet he madly thinks it is in its power to cure his soul."

"The greatest judgment which God himself can, in the present life, inflict upon a man is to leave him in the hand of his own boasted 'free'-will."

"Look where you will, and you will generally find that 'free'-willers are very 'free'-livers."

You can purchase Toplady's complete works in the link below. The letters he wrote to John Wesley which are included here are amazing. If what he asserts in these is true, Wesley was not an honest man in all his dealings.

END OF POST

"Can I Lose My Salvation?" [Eternal Security](Doug Eaton)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:51:00 +0000

The issue of whether a Christian can lose their savlation is one of the most debated topics in all of Christendom. Doug Eaton discussed the arguments those opposed to God preserving His saints often make and made a case from Scripture that eternal security is a biblical teaching.

Doug's Youtube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/deaton29

Doug's Blog:
http://godwardthoughts.blogspot.com

Another Website Doug Contributes to:
http://christiantheology.wordpress.com

(Thanks to Ben Davis of Symphony Of Scripture for making the graphics for this presentation.)

END OF POST

Does 1Timothy 2:4 Refute Calvinism?(James White)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 03:56:00 +0000

END OF POST

"Depart From Me; I Never Knew You..."(Doug Eaton)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:55:00 +0000

Wonderful.

END OF POST

Video of Todd Bentley Physically Assaulting Someone

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:10:00 +0000

Here is video of self-proclaimed "revivalist" Todd Bentley physically assaulting someone with stage four colon cancer all in the name of Jesus Christ. I'm not a psychologist, but I believe this is evidence enough to say that anyone who is still considering that this charlatan is legit needs to get their head checked. This is utter blasphemy.

Here is Todd Friel critiquing Bentley's physical assault on Way of the Master Radio:

Video HT: Way of the Master Radio
Here are two more videos exposing this charlatan who, amazingly, is becoming "Rick Warren-esque" in terms of popularity with certain professing evangelicals:

Link 1

Link 2

END OF POST

"I Grew Up a 'Christian'."(Susan Yenser's Story)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:24:00 +0000

This is a testimony of a very close friend of mine, Susan Yenser (denyyourself20 on Youtube). Susan gave this recently at an FCA meeting at the University of Florida. She's one of the few people that I can say with all honesty that I'm a better person for knowing.

You can read more about Susan here.

Her blog is:
http://denyyourselfdaily.blogspot.com

Her Youtube channel is:
http://www.youtube.com/denyyourself20

END OF POST

YouTube :: Videos by LaneCh

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:28:00 +0000

YouTube :: Videos by LaneCh

What to do in Case of an Emergency (Mark Kielar)

Posted: 26 Jun 2008 05:36 PM CDT

(Yes, I'm able to upload videos longer than 10 min and up to 1GB in size now. You can click here to learn more about why: http://www.lanechaplin.com/2008/06/yes-i-know-im-full-of-them-lately.html ) http://www.firstboynton.com

Author: LaneCh
Keywords: todd bentley kgwilso newspringchurch gccwired mark kielar
Added: June 26, 2008

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

That Which Was From the Beginning...

Posted: 26 Jun 2008 12:08 PM CDT

This is a neat little witnessing clip to share with others from CrossTV. http://www.crosstv.com

Author: LaneCh
Keywords: kgwilso newspringchurch gccwired todd bentley rick warren joel osteen mark kielar
Added: June 26, 2008

This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now

The Encouragment of the Lord

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:29:00 +0000

The summary of this blog is shared before the first post is met when a person scrolls down:

(This site was not developed with the intention of drawing a large number of visitors using trivial methods and shallowness. There is rejoicing among the angels of God over even one sinner that repents and believes in Jesus Christ. (Luke 15:10) If, for as long as this site is in existence, only one sinner is lead to repentance and belief with the aid of the material presented here, then the purpose of this site has been served.)

Recently someone contacted me wanting to share a testimony of a brother they have shared with in a forum. After receiving permission from this brother, I am now going to post the message. I don't want to say anything further because I don't think I could do this the justice it should receive from my feeble words except that I wept before I finished this message:

Lane,

I'm a member of a message board that is a secular one, but has a Religion/Philosophy/Christianity forum on it.

I posted the link to your full video message, The True Gospel (Paul Washer @ VCY America Conference). I wanted you to see a message I just received about it.....

----------------

You don't know me, but I just wanted to thank you for posting that Paul Washer "True Gospel" YouTube video. I'm 23-years-old, grew up in a Christian home, and *thought* I knew quite a bit about the Gospel and Christianity in general. In fact, if you had asked me two weeks ago if I was a Christian I probably would have said yes.

Then, thanks in part to you for posting that video here on these forums, I came to know the real Gospel, and on June 14th of this year (only ten days ago) I really, truly came to know Christ. Over the last ten days I've experience a change in my life that's practically unexplainable. Certain sins that used to plague my life and that I KNOW I could have never overcome on my own have suddenly vanished. And the sin that still is in my life is now so detestable and abhorrent to me that I have to repent of it 2-3 times a day.

I've stopped watching television. I've stopped doing and loving the worldly activities that consumed my former life. Now all I seem to want to do is read Scripture, listen to audio sermons on my computer, praise and glorify God through prayer, and live in the footsteps of Christ. In fact, since my conversion I can't even stop thinking about Christ! It's wonderful.

I have Biblical assurance of my salvation; there's no denying the supernatural change that has occurred in my life. I am saved.

Anyway, I've shared all of this with my family and friends, and I thought I should tell you about it as well. It really is amazing what one small action of posting a YouTube video on an internet forum can do in the lives of others. (I've even posted it on a few forums myself in recent days!) The Lord truly does work in mysteries and wonderful ways. So, again, thank you. And thank the Lord.

Keep up the good work, my friend.

Your brother in Christ,

Joel
-------------------------------------

I wanted to share this wonderful news to show you how much of a difference the work that you're doing is making. May the Lamb that was slain receive the reward of His suffering!

In His Service,
Keith

The angels are rejoicing. May the Lord receive the reward of his suffering.

END OF POST

The Reformata Blog Network

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:12:00 +0000

Recently, I was asked by Sam Guzman, Ingrid of SliceofLaodicea's son, to be part of a blogging network that will bring different Christians from around the world to one site and have their posts published all in one feed. Sam gives a better description of the site than I can:

Reformata is a blog network– a combination of several blogs with a unique perspective and a common goal. For more about our purpose, visit our Mission page.

The posts you see on the homepage come from several different blogs, and they are updated automatically at regular intervals. If you would like to subscribe to all of the network blogs at once, you may subscribe to the Reformata RSS feed.

Network Members
Christian Research Network
Slice of Laodicea
Reformed Voices
Lane Chaplin
Always Ready

Here's the mission statement:

Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.-Matthew 7:15-17

In the day in which we live, the true Gospel is constantly under attack, both from inside the church and out. The attacks from the inside come in the form of false teachers who are declaring a false gospel, a false Jesus, and a false Christianity. They deceive many through their twisting of Scripture, undermining of the authority of God’s Word, denial of repentance, and teaching of a god that is tolerant of sin.

In addition to false teachers, the church is also weakened by pastors who treat the church like a business, building huge assemblies through clever marketing schemes, gimmicks, and sinful practices. This is done in the name of relevance, and is often done with good intentions, but it is harmful nonetheless.

In Scripture, however, churches are never commended for their size or their outwardly successful programs; rather, they are commended for their faithfulness, love, and defense of the truth. The Reformata blog network is composed of bloggers who recognize this, and who are passionate about counteracting these trends within the church by reclaiming the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. We recognize that the work of reformation is never finished until Christ returns, and therefore the needs for discernment and revival are constant.

Because the Church must always be reforming, we believe we must ever be analyzing our faith and practice and ajusting it into greater conformity with God’s unchanging Word. This involves defending the truth by addressing and exposing error, false doctrine, and sin within the body, as well as edifying believers through the clear proclamation of biblical Truth. This must always be done circumspectly and humbly, yet boldly and with Scriptural clarity. The cancers of sin and heresy must be condemned for what they are, yet the antidote, God’s grace in the Gospel, must always be presented. It is for these purposes that the Reformata blog network exists. May God be glorified in using weak vessels such as ourselves to proclaim the glorious Gospel of his Son.

Semper Reformata

Click here to visit Reformata:

END OF POST

Faith and Repentance Are Inseparable(C.H. Spurgeon)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:52:00 +0000

The repentance which is here commanded is the result of faith; it is born at the same time with faith—they are twins, and to say which is the elder-born passes my knowledge. It is a great mystery; faith is before repentance in some of its acts, and repentance before faith in another view of it; the fact being that they come into the soul together. Now, a repentance which makes me weep and abhor my past life because of the love of Christ which has pardoned it, is the right repentance. When I can say, "My sin is washed away by Jesu's blood," and then repent because I so sinned as to make it necessary that Christ should die—that dove-eyed repentance which looks at his bleeding wounds, and feels that her heart must bleed because she wounded Christ—that broken heart that breaks because Christ was nailed to the cross for it—that is the repentance which bringeth us salvation.

Again, the repentance which makes us avoid present sin because of the love of God who died for us, this also is saving repentance. If I avoid sin to-day because I am afraid of being lost if I commit it, I have not the repentance of a child of God; but when I avoid it and seek to lead a holy life because Christ loved me and gave himself up for me, and because I am not my own, but am bought with a price, this is the work of the Spirit of God.

- C.H. Spurgeon

END OF POST

Does John 3:16 Debunk Calvinism?(James White)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:40:00 +0000

This is actually a lecture I posted earlier in the "Common Attacks Against Reformed Theology" lectures. Since I'm able to post videos that are as long as I need them to be now, I asked James White if I could start posting these to Youtube for the audience there. Of course, he was happy for me to. If you've already squeezed all you could from the lecture posted on the previous playlist, I suggest moving on because it's the same audio set to a picture slideshow. If you haven't, though, this gives wonderful evidence as to why John 3:16 does not refute Calvinism. I may post the other lectures in the near future, Lord willing.

END OF POST

"Come to Me" (Isaiah 55)(Paul Washer)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:42:00 +0000

END OF POST

James White's Youtube Channel (Subscribe!)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:51:00 +0000

For the three of you out there that might not be aware of this, James White has a Youtube channel that he often posts commentary, rebuttals, etc. on. There's a plethora of great commentary on there about issues that are affecting Christians on a daily basis including issues on confronting homosexuality, Islam, and the King James Only movement. I highly recommend subscribing if you're a user. He doesn't cease to provide wonderful videos consistently. If you're not registered as a user with Youtube, and would like to but don't know how, just let me know. I'll walk you through it. Here's the link:

END OF POST

Todd Bentley's Lakeland "Revival"(Crosstalk VCY America)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:58:00 +0000

Crosstalk VCY America

END OF POST

Yes, I Know. I'm Full of Them Lately...(UPDATE 6/17/08)

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:44:00 +0000

Keeping with the recent tradition of announcements ( Yeah, all of two posts :) ), I learned earlier tonight from Youtube that they've granted me the ability to upload videos that are longer than 10 minutes in length because of my partnership with them. What this means is that entire sermons by Paul Washer, Jeff Noblit, Mark Kielar, etc. that were on revver are now going to be able to be viewed in their entirety on the most popular video outlet on the internet. Lord willing, this will expose even that much more people to sound, Biblical teaching. What's even better is that I will leave the embed option on so you can post these on your own site for others to view in their entirety. I am very excited about this new development because it means that not as much time will be needed to post videos on Youtube for all to see, and productivity should increase as a result. I should have two videos up by tonight and more tomorrow, Lord willing.

Here's an example of what I'm speaking of:

UPDATE 6/17/08:

Some people have been asking me about the Youtube partnership and what it entails so I figured I'd explain that a little more in this post. Several months ago, Youtube contacted me about becoming a partner with them. I thought it would be a great opportunity to get the videos out to people who may not see them otherwise. With the Youtube partnership, I'm able to add a channel banner, have the featured video play automatically when you visit the page, and have video banners along with other little perks. To become a partner, you don't have to be asked by them per say. You can apply for the partnership here.

END OF POST

Two Pretty Big Announcements Regarding Me

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:52:00 +0000

The title of this post may be a little misleading because the first is particularly regarding me and the second will affect a few people, too. The first is...

I got accepted to law school!

Trinity Law School in Santa Ana, CA sent a letter of acceptance last week. I'm not sure if I could be more thankful to God for giving me this opportunity. I've wanted to go into law since I was a child. My parents always said I should because they say that I can argue a point into the ground. (I don't think they meant that favorably all the time, but I've realized in my later years that that's actually a good thing when dealing with such things as post-modernism.) In fact, my senior quote in the yearbook talks about plans for law school after college.

Not only is Trinity a law school, it is a law school in the Augustinian tradition (natural law perspective). I got a recommended reading list with the acceptance letter and have been reading stuff by Plato and Aristotle on the laws and ethics among others since. It was also great that a lot of the books they recommend are books that I already own so accessing them isn't an issue. Here is a promo video for the school.

That's the first announcement, and it needed to be made first because the second kind of derives from it. Because of the move across country (SC to CA) and the costs invovled in getting started in an endeavor like this, I've decided to clean out my library once again on eBay to help with the costs. I'm selling primarily books that I know I won't have a hard time finding again in the future. Most of these books, although easily accessible to one who is looking for them, are wonderful in substance (I can't speak on the Gary North book because I haven't read it). Once again, you have a chance to pick up some great books at possibly low prices at this link:

Again, I'm thankful for being accepted and know the Lord is sovereign in this as in all things. I am excited about getting better acquainted with a few people I know from meeting and conversing with on the internet who live there now but haven't met face to face. I think I've found a place to live that is really close to campus so housing isn't an issue. The next order of business will be to find a job there so if you know of anyone who would like to hire someone attending a law school near Santa Ana, I'm all ears. :) Now that I've learned that I'm accepted, the financial aspect is really the only factor determining whether I'll be in Santa Ana in the fall, Lord willing.

Thanks again to all of you who read my posts and watch the videos I post on Youtube. I've been edified by only knowing some of you via the internet; I can't imagine the positive impact that will be made on me from knowing several of you face to face now, Lord willing. Take care, all.

END OF POST

The Axiom of Calvinism

noreply@blogger.com (Lane Chaplin) — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:50:00 +0000

God's grace is necessary, and no one deserves it.

Many people wonder where to start when sharing the doctrines of grace with someone or learning them themselves. Some think they should start with total depravity; others with predestination. No; get this axiom (starting point), and the rest comes naturally.

You may say, "Hey, even Rome believes that grace is necessary!" They do say that, but what they teach is very different. They view grace as something deserved, but the definition of grace excludes any type of merit to the recipient. They teach that if someone does well with the grace that is given to them, they'll earn more. Excuse me; how does one earn something that by definition is not given by merit? They don't. If you start with this axiom and understand that grace/mercy is something that no one deserves, and it is necessary to salvation, the doctrines of grace logically follow. Even Arminianism leaves room for boasting because it holds that man in his natural, fallen, unregenerate, biblically dead state does something in their natural, fallen, unregenerate, biblically dead will to "initiate salvation." Watch James White explain this in the following clip:

If your definition of grace is honest, well, just look at much of professing evangelicalism, Roman Catholicism, Arminianism, and basically any non-Reformed position, and you'll have little trouble understanding what exactly the problem is. For grace is necessary for salvation, but it is not deserved or merited by definition.

END OF POST