<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Legal Humour</title><link>http://www.legalhumour.com/</link><description>Legal Humour.com is a site for anyone who enjoys funny stories about lawyers, the law and legal practice. No lawyer jokes. Just well written and witty articles, satire and news.</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 03:01:43 -0500</lastBuildDate><generator>CX CMS</generator><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LegalHumourBlawg" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.rojo.com/add-subscription?resource=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://blog.rojo.com/RojoWideRed.gif">Subscribe with Rojo</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/LegalHumourBlawg" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FLegalHumourBlawg" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item><title>Martha Stewart - No Tea For You</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/322858010/Martha_Stewart.html</link><category>Legal Humour Corner</category><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 02:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Martha_Stewart.html</guid><description>British immigration authorities have denied design and culinary guru Martha Stewart entry into England for a business trip. The reason cited for their decision is her American criminal record, wherein she was convicted a couple of years ago for some stock related activities and sentence to jail for 6 months. A UK Border Agency spokesperson commented, &amp;quot;We continue to oppose the entry to the UK of individuals where we believe their presence in the United Kingdom is not conducive to the public good or where they have been found guilty of serious criminal offences abroad.&amp;quot;Now how in the world is&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=tGrxXI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=tGrxXI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=BAcMuI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=BAcMuI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=cq9U5i"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=cq9U5i" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=5iN8BI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=5iN8BI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/322858010" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Martha_Stewart.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Legal Humour News - June 30, 2008</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/322870966/LHN_080630.html</link><category>Legal Humour News</category><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:55:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080630.html</guid><description>Hi and welcome to this week&amp;#39;s newsletter. If it&amp;#39;s in the news and it&amp;#39;s got a legal slant, we&amp;#39;ll do a blawg on it.British authorities have denied Martha Stewart entry into the UK for a business trip.&amp;nbsp; As expected the authorities are most concerned about the best interest of the public.&amp;nbsp; Enjoy Marcel&amp;#39;s blawg, Martha Stewart - No Tea For You, where you read about how banning Martha Stewart will protect England.&amp;nbsp;And on the topic of honesty, have you ever noticed how many expressions there are for the term, &amp;quot;honesty.&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp; And how many of these find their way into our&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=BqFPEI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=BqFPEI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=LIQNdI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=LIQNdI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=VeqvCi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=VeqvCi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=wIdfcI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=wIdfcI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/322870966" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080630.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Class Donuts</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/312745036/Class_Donuts.html</link><category>Legal Humour Corner</category><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 03:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Class_Donuts.html</guid><description>Tim Hortons was in the news recently when a story surfaced about an employee getting fired for giving a toddler a freebie Timbit. Another story followed about a week plus long trial wherein an employee was suing for wrongful dismissal for allegedly stealing a toonie. &amp;nbsp;And now here comes the big one.&amp;nbsp; Franchisees are staring a class action for 1.95 billion dollars claiming that a couple of years ago, Tim Hortons made them switch from freshly oven baked donuts to frozen donuts which the franchisees heat up in expensive microwaves they were forced to buy. They claim their profit margins&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=EY1JcI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=EY1JcI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=zKxrAI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=zKxrAI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=n7ZtNi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=n7ZtNi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=smUaJI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=smUaJI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/312745036" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Class_Donuts.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Legal Humour News - June 16, 2008</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/312745037/LHN_080616.html</link><category>Legal Humour News</category><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:05:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080616.html</guid><description>Hi and welcome to this week&amp;#39;s newsletter. If it&amp;#39;s in the news and it&amp;#39;s got a legal slant, we&amp;#39;ll do a blawg on it.Tim Hortons is in trouble again. Franchisees are suing the donut giant seeking class action certification claiming they are losing profits big time since TH made them switch from freshly baked donuts to frozen and microwave heated donuts.&amp;nbsp; Marcel sees a fresh class action about to happen, by consumers who suffer nervous shock on hearing the news about their favourite donuts being micro zapped.&amp;nbsp; Read all about it in his blawg, Class Donuts.Speaking of round objects, is&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=KGycOI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=KGycOI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=Ub6VcI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=Ub6VcI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=DNbwMi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=DNbwMi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=dWx1qI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=dWx1qI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/312745037" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080616.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Airline Service?  Call Iron Justiceman</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/302556306/Airline_Service.html</link><category>Legal Humour Corner</category><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:30:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Airline_Service.html</guid><description>New York lawyer Richard Roth is suing Delta Air Lines for $1 million for damages for his family&amp;rsquo;s ruined vacation last Christmas. Due to delays in leaving New York, they missed the connecting flight in Atlanta to Buenos Aires and Delta would not readily put them on another flight. Roth had to wait three days in Atlanta before rebooking with another airline to Argentina. On top of that his luggage got delayed for five days and he lost about $21k for unused hotel bookings. &amp;nbsp;Bravo Richard Roth. No doubt we all are finding airlines&amp;rsquo; service and attitude getting increasingly atrocious.&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=2GU5qI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=2GU5qI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=5VVE6I"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=5VVE6I" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=M7VKZi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=M7VKZi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=ggRmdI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=ggRmdI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/302556306" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Airline_Service.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Legal Humour News - June 2, 2008</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/302556307/LHN_080602.html</link><category>Legal Humour News</category><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:55:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080602.html</guid><description>Hi and welcome to this week&amp;#39;s newsletter. If it&amp;#39;s in the news and it&amp;#39;s got a legal slant, we&amp;#39;ll do a blawg on it.Richard Roth is suing Delta Air Lines for ruining his family&amp;#39;s vacation.&amp;nbsp; Roth says Delta had dealt with him arrogantly and rudely.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Although juires are fine, we miss that champion of the underdog,&amp;nbsp; the late Lord Denning, in dealing with cases like this.&amp;nbsp; Please enjoy Airline service? Call Iron Justiceman, where Marcel resurrects His Lordship to judge this case.&amp;nbsp;As well develop more instant rapport with your clients by becoming multilingual.&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s not as hard as you may&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=Z28oCI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=Z28oCI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=xSIjbI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=xSIjbI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=ewBRzi"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=ewBRzi" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=WImZaI"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=WImZaI" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/302556307" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080602.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Mustapha v Culligan - Is the Case as Dead as the Fly?</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/298083545/Mustapha.html</link><category>Legal Humour Corner</category><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 03:15:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Mustapha.html</guid><description>The Supreme Court of Canada recently tossed out Martin Mustapha&amp;rsquo;s fly in the Culligan water tank case. Mr. M, an Ottawa hairdresser, used to order Culligan spring water for his home use. One day in 2001 he noticed a dead fly floating around aimlessly in his water cooler. He apparently freaked out and suffered major psychological trauma including depression. He developed an aversion to water, avoiding drinking and showering. Mustapha sued Culligan and was successful. The trial judge awarded him over $300,000 in damages. Culligan appealed and the Ontario Court of Appeal said, &amp;ldquo;uh uh&amp;rdquo;, (not an uncommon legal maxim).&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=9kRXcH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=9kRXcH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=FlrEqH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=FlrEqH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=6w8d3h"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=6w8d3h" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=OZJXbH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=OZJXbH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/298083545" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Mustapha.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Due to Turbulence, Please Return to Your Toilet Seat</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/298083546/Due_to_Turbulence.html</link><category>Legal Humour Corner</category><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 02:00:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Due_to_Turbulence.html</guid><description>Gokhan Mutlu has little love for Jet Blue Airways. He is suing them. It seems he had a complimentary ticket on a flight from San Diego to New York. Due to a seat shortage, an hour and a half into the flight, the pilot demanded that Gokhan Mutlu relinquish his seat to a stewardess. Both had been flying complementary but the stewardess had been sitting on a swing seat reserved for fight attendants which seat she did not like. As seats were in such short supply, the pilot asked Gokhan to sit out the flight on the toilet. This seating&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=lDopjH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=lDopjH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=SIUJJH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=SIUJJH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=E1wXxh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=E1wXxh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=wyV9qH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=wyV9qH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/298083546" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Due_to_Turbulence.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Legal Humour News - May 26, 2008</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/298106564/LHN_080526.html</link><category>Legal Humour News</category><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:45:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080526.html</guid><description>Hi and welcome to this week&amp;#39;s newsletter. If it&amp;#39;s in the news and it&amp;#39;s got a legal slant, we&amp;#39;ll do a blawg on it.Last week was not a good week for Martin Mustapha. The Supreme Court of Canada tossed out his nervous shock case arising out of his seeing a dead fly floating around in his kitchen water cooler.&amp;nbsp; Marcel however has ideas how future claimants in similar circumstances could successfully pursue such claims.&amp;nbsp; Read his blawg, Mustapha v Culligan - Is the case as dead as the fly?&amp;nbsp;And keeping on the topic of emotional damage,&amp;nbsp; have you noticed that&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=psswYH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=psswYH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=kxQAyH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=kxQAyH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=vg7bTh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=vg7bTh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=uHvyRH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=uHvyRH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/298106564" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Humour_News/LHN_080526.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Timbit Ouster</title><link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~3/288335232/Timbit_Ouster.html</link><category>Legal Humour Corner</category><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 02:40:00 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Timbit_Ouster.html</guid><description>Tim Hortons in London, Ontario, fired a three-year employee for cause. The reason? She gave a free Timbit to a baby sitting in a stroller. Give me a break. Timbits sell for about 16 cents (plus 5% GST). The employee Nicole Lilliman saw the toddler pointing to those tiny donut balls and she decided to give the kid one. Suddenly all hell broke loose and the outlet&amp;rsquo;s manager, no doubt following company rule # 432, ie., &amp;quot;causing the team to compromise its profit&amp;quot;, promptly fired Nicole. The good news is that after an uproar in the media, 27 year old&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=V0vFWH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=V0vFWH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=0QjXEH"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=0QjXEH" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=tGMjbh"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=tGMjbh" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?a=Tf7o5H"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/LegalHumourBlawg?i=Tf7o5H" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LegalHumourBlawg/~4/288335232" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://www.legalhumour.com/Blog/Legal_Commentaries/Timbit_Ouster.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
