911 Truth and Loose Change
I can't help but to keep coming back to the 911 story. There is so much material now on line challenging the official stories and every so often I take the time to have a look at some new videos. Two have come to my attention this weekend, both about an hour and a half long, that are quite disturbing. I am not going to claim that everything in them is correct - but there are so many unanswered questions and facts that simply don't add up.
The first video is called 911 Press for Truth and details in part the story of 4 New Jersey Widows of men killed in the World Trade Centre, who, unable to get their questions answered pressed for and got a Commission of enquiry - only to see that whole process whitewashed and the questions remain unanswered.
911 - Press for Truth
The second part of this video details the work undertaken by Paul Thompson in creating the 911 Timeline - a Collaborative Web project that has compiled an amazingly detailed time Line of the lead up to 911 - the events of that day , and the post 911 cover up.
The Complete 911 Timeline Project
Finally the most recent video is Loose Change, a fascinating documentary complied of official news items, audio reports and video footage of all the major events of 911 and the lead up to it and challenging the official stories. It is difficult I believe to watch this video and not question the official story.
Loose Change (Second Edition)
3 comments:
I haven't watched all of this but the material is familiar and is all over the Internet as you say. Read this though:
http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,2007519,00.html
and this
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2017005,00.html
also available via
http://www.monbiot.com/
Not read his articles before - but I have read many supporters of the official conspiracy theory - and that is the issue - There is no real evidence to support the official story so it in itself becomes another conspiracy theory - that 19 terrorists successfully conspired to attack the USA using hijacked planes.
I don't support any particular conspiracy theory - I just find that the official conspiracy theory is less believable than most of the others.
I find it really difficult to understand how it was possible for a hijacked plane, flown by an amateur pilot, to reach the pentagon over an hour after the first of four planes was known to be hijacked and half an hour after the second WTC building was hit - in the most defended piece of airspace on the planet, make an almost impossible high speed manoeuvre taking it close enough to the White House to alert anti aircraft missiles, and then crash into the second floor of a low level building. Why would they not have just pointed it into a dive and ploughed it into the middle of the Pentagon. Instead they manage to hit the one side of the building that has just been fully reinforced against attack. How lucky!!!
This is just one of the far fetched official stories people are asking me to believe - sorry - I just don't buy it - I am not that stupid or gullible.
"Press for Truth" is the video to see. Its evidentiary base is superb and so is its production values.
Post a Comment