Saturday April 27, 2024
SNc Channels:

Search
About Salem-News.com

 

Jun-25-2008 17:09printcomments

'Truly-Open Election'
Challenges Our Nation
As Never Possible Before

"Liberal" vs "Conservative" truths at stake, demand honest, open, inevitable comparisons.

Salem-News.com
Salem-News.com

(EUGENE, Ore.) - "A pox on both those failed parties!" may well turn out to be the famous-theme of this 2008 voter-choice struggle. "Failed choices" from both Democratic and GOP sides have dominated the past 50 years, forcing us all into permanent campaign-posture confrontation; precluding progress to what millions keep SAYING they want and, now MUST HAVE, as the 21st Century arrives.

That’s the open-for-action situation confronting the voters in this ostensibly once-democracy, in 2008. It rests firmly on the highly apparent failures of both "liberal" and "conservative" traditions once thought to be essential guiding beacons for the American nation.

With neocon/control of "conservative" governance in demonstrated disaster on every front, over every issue, and at every level, the once-elephant-GOP is now seen reduced to a sad creature, indeed: Not able to tell its once-powerful trunk from its massive far-end.

Now under neocon control, the once-massive party is surely still generating deficiently destructive designs; as in rumored "October Surprise" for Iran; despite all efforts to staunch its bloody path since our ONLY "preemptive war"; clearly provided by its sponsor-use of crassly-manipulated commercial-marketing methods.

Then there’s the testy, defiant Democratic duopoly of elite/and/prosperous and blue-collar/intense; once famed for continuous contention when in the minority, even when furiously split --as over the past 30-year ‘conservative’ ascendancy.

Nixon’s (in)famous "Southern strategy" set the national stage for that. Then Reagan’s "Morning In America" did the rest, equally infamously, now, especially for its killing-off the union-movement attitude and its consequences for our growing Middle Class, and their American Dream.

What’s left of once-predominant Demos --as in FDR’s time-- has been not-so-suddenly reduced to complicit cooperation all too frequently, for whatever reasons leadership now declaims all too constantly.

Perhaps the lowest-blow, despite generally accepted Amercan-right to organize at work, is the near-death struggles forced on union groups by determined, deadly corporate pressures definitely designed to "win at any cost" --a major part of political confrontation/consequences now absolutely obvious.

The infamous outcomes and completely foreseeable consequences now truly haunt each component of these two "political parties"; originated as essential equitable working-process for both these essential equitable basic philosophies.

Both have been growing naturally for many decades, supplying deep foundations for slow maturation of our democracy.

Prescient prognosticators have been predicting precisely this sad, unseemly, and now destructive outcome ever since the Seventies --even long before. That’s when the chaotic Sixties confrontations and coalescing trend-impacts were finally recognized for what/they/were: Growth-spasms unavoidable among emerging new components and constituent groups both joining-and-dividing us-all.

But true consensus doth exist among many millions of Americans today about what is REALLY now essential for our further progress into the 21st Century. That’s WHY the "pox on both of you" attitude is so clearly shaping what HAS already happened.

Those same inescapable forces --now at work with a new generation exercising its own values-- will now, almost inevitably, continue to shape, size, set up and force into inescapable motion what millions of Americans truly seek NOW from their governance system.

That, too, is among the greatest strengths of a democratic system: It provides for continuous change, under the control of more-informed, longer-experienced, better-prepared citizens, relating their youthful strengths, enthusiasms and passionate love for freedoms to what they have learned from those-before.


Millions polled or otherwise questioned, over decade after decade, have tolled off the top-list of simple and sensible developments-demanded: Secure economy; avoidance of war; equal rights under law for all; better access to healthcare; more, better, longer education for all.

The emphasis changes with the decade, but those same basic needs have been there as-listed since before the Civil War --as the new generation plainly knows. That’s WHY they demand CHANGE NOW, because it has been so/long/coming while "the parties" played political snatch-tag with each other’s prizes.

That’s WHY they seek solution, somehow, now, no matter whom it displaces, where or when or how. That’s WHY they are out there fighting for what they believe they MUST HAVE; and readying to vote.

They are --very rightly-- "tired of waiting"; which plain fact rings very loud warning bells for all-us-elders, no matter which failed-group we happened to support.

We are at heart, truly, an emotional people. Our entire history from our Revolution and the closely-following Founders-times on throughout our own inescapable record --and even with most of our costly “wasting wars” -- proves that positively; by what we intended-when-we-began, if not always what followed via "unforeseen consequence", sometimes all too easily "foreseeable" now.

Today’s powers of hindsight offer probing evolution of full-information from unrevealed resources-then. (As on interior details of the so-called "Reagan Revolution" and the Vietnam-vintage Johnson errors.)

For the earlier periods of that peculiarly unique American record among world development of nations-and-their peoples, "progress" depended on so many factors and fixtures and sometimes figments, too. We must accept what the pages of history now tell us about-then, when read with probing attitude.

But that the spirit of freedom-seeking democracy was deeply enmeshed in whatever we-as-a-people tried to do --at ANY point in our checkered history-- there can be little doubt; despite the differences in attitude and outcomes on that record between our two parties supplying that absolutely-essential political/process.

NOW, learning as we slowly mature into the nation we deserve to be, given the essentials of freedom and equality-under-law for all; free to develop to the very height of each one’s own achievable-levels; we are freeing ourselves in this coming election to make basic choices.

We can NOW reach those demanded and essential decisions-for-CHANGE sure to shape our nation --and ourselves!-- for this new Century.

What will we now DO? Retreat is impossible: There is no place to go but forward. How can we escape decisions? We CANNOT; too much is at risk, under threat of "that mushroom cloud." Why doth this fall to US?

Because it IS "our nation, one and indivisible" --and because we are the ONLY Americans --no matter origin, or color, or ancestors, or religion, or class, or dollar-pile status. NOW "we must stand alone --and ready to act". That’s how democracy works --when it does.

--------------------------------------------------------

Reader’s Note:
Quotes are shortened, compiled, condensed for space reasons here; verbatim sources on request with ID to Editor Tim. More than forty references including author’s files, news and columnist clips, and special reports were consulted for this Op Ed.

Books include:
1. Why Americans Hate Politics; E.J. Dionne,Jr.; ISBN: 0-671077877-3. Note: This exquisite analysis was published in 1991, and is noted for its “false choices” findings for both "liberal" and "conservative" groups ‘way back then, setting the stage for developments now.
2. WHAT HAPPENED: Inside the Bush White House and Washington’s Culture of Deception; Scott McClellan; 2008; ISBN: 978-1-58648-556-6
3. THE CREATION OF THE MEDIA: Political Origins of Modern Communications; Paul Starr; 2004; ISBN: 0-465-08193-2.

A list of all documentation used is available on request to Editor Tim, with ID, for direct contact.




Comments Leave a comment on this story.
Name:

All comments and messages are approved by people and self promotional links or unacceptable comments are denied.



Henry Ruark July 2, 2008 1:58 pm (Pacific time)

To all: Please note Dionne ref. was published in 1991 ! -thus is strong contemporary coverage. THAT is why I used it; check now on current Dionne content will show striking parallel he sees with some of strongest forces-then; which is another reason I chose this reference.


Henry Ruark July 2, 2008 12:26 pm (Pacific time)

Myron et al: Yours distorts the complex realities in play-then, now being repeated via "race card" in this campaign. For solid, sensible coverage of this period, see Dionne book listed in R-N on Op Ed. Unless and until you check further, do not embarrass self via more misplaced misinformation; that's not riposte to yours but simple emphasis on need for honest, open, democratic dialog here based on more than b-b feeling from outmoded sources.


Myron June 28, 2008 8:53 am (Pacific time)

I am sure most all of you know, the vast majority of southern democrats (both in the Senate and House) voted against literally all civil rights legislation back in the 1960's. This was a very sad time for our country. Since that time there has been a shift of voting patterns away from national democratic candidates. If this was a strategy on someone's part, then it was precipitated because of the anti-civil rights voting pattern, in my opinion. Note: As Preident Johnson so rightfully acknowledged, if it were not for the "party of Lincoln" the civil rights legislation would not have passed. Please review votes. As per above article: "...What’s left of once-predominant Demos --as in FDR’s time-- has been not-so-suddenly reduced to complicit cooperation all too frequently, for whatever reasons leadership now declaims all too constantly..." Blue-Dog democrats and Sen. Zell.


Henry Clay Ruark June 27, 2008 7:33 am (Pacific time)

Myron E. et al: "See with own eyes" re the complexities involved then, and the "Southern strategy": E.J. Dionne's famed "Why Americans Hate Politics", p. 81; ISBN 0-671-77677-3 Bill Moyers, then-press secretary, hears President Lyndon Johnson state re his Presidential actions-then: "I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time" -- as he signed Civil Rights Act of 1964. It was Presidential candidate Nixon who then perpetrated "the Southern strategy" making that Johnson feeling come true, and thus initiating much-malign "win at any cost" manipulation ever since, setting up party confrontation like never before. (Reviewed Dionne for this Op Ed series, along with classic "Imperial Presidency" by Schlesinger, another famed overall view; mentioned here for those readers serious enough to dig for themselves and re-learn what our real history tells us now.)


Henry Ruark June 26, 2008 6:14 pm (Pacific time)

Myron E. et al: Your error begins with what aticle "referred to". It sums up that entire era, before and since FDR. Re "segregationist" charges, FDR was politician in highly complex times, misunderstood in detail by you as yours reveals. Some of what he did came from that, some from inescapable forces at work then, some from his own free choice. But he was no segregationist as public record of accomplishment fully establishes, and it was his courageous actions, often at political and personal costs, which brought about a whole list of legislation and special efforts, establishing our midddle class, and setting up a run of better times for many still unprecedented in our history. That's why what he did is famed worldwide as the New Deal, despite denegration and attack by those with political purpose clearly evident.


Myron E June 26, 2008 7:39 am (Pacific time)

The above article referred to FDR's time. Besides the racist policy of putting tens of thousands of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps and making unseemly comments about American's of German ("dangerous") and Italian ("opera singers") ancestory, he also helped in developing a southern strategery of racial descrimination which was seen as per the southern congressional voting pattern during the 1960's Civil Rights legislation. Roosevelt also appointed two notorious segregationists to the United States Supreme Court. Roosevelt appointed South Carolina segregationist Democrat Jimmy Byrnes (remember that current Sen. Byrd from West Virginia was a KKK Grand Dragon) to the court. Roosevelt later made Byrnes a top advisor, where the segregationist earned the nickname "assistant president." Byrnes was Roosevelt's second choice behind Harry Truman for the VP nod in his 1944 reelection bid. Roosevelt also appointed segregationist Democrat Senator Hugo Black of Alabama to the court. Black was a former member of the Ku Klux Klan with a notorious record of racism himself.

[Return to Top]
©2024 Salem-News.com. All opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Salem-News.com.


Articles for June 24, 2008 | Articles for June 25, 2008 | Articles for June 26, 2008

Tribute to Palestine and to the incredible courage, determination and struggle of the Palestinian People. ~Dom Martin

Support
Salem-News.com:



Annual Hemp Festival & Event Calendar

Special Section: Truth telling news about marijuana related issues and events.